Clarity News - Fall 2012

  • Upload
    raj-tha

  • View
    216

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Clarity News - Fall 2012

    1/2

    Jude M. Werra & Associates, LLC Fall, 2012

    ELECTION VS. SELECTIONWHAT A DIFFERENCE AN S MAKES

    Here we are in the election season in

    the U.S., ruminating about who we

    willelectto vote for among a slate of

    offices. We carefully assess each

    individual, in light of the future paths

    that we have elected to pursue for

    ourselves.

    A person elects a personal path,

    while an organization selects from

    among options.

    Although some candidates run as

    independents, most of those listed on

    a ballot are selected to run by

    political parties. Once in office the

    winners often elect to define

    themselves rather differently than we

    may have expected based upon their

    campaign promises, as they go about

    electing the course they personally

    deem best.

    In careers individuals elect their

    varying paths, while organizations

    and entrepreneurs select the talent

    they deem best suited to advancing

    their future plans. Individuals elect

    favored roles, while organizations

    screen the candidates as they select

    talents they judge as best for their

    organization needs.

    The wise adage: Be careful what

    you ask foryou may get it appliesto both parties when decisions are

    made about joining organizations.

    Whether you are doing the hiring or

    are a candidate who may be hired,the degree of careful discernment, in

    both election and selection, makes all

    the difference.

    For both parties the clear temptation

    is to play the odds, in a seeming

    dance of castanets (bad pun?),

    rather than focusing on spearing their

    very best solution.

    A candidate does not improve

    election odds by placing a bet onevery potential employer that they

    might approach. Our work life is not

    a gambling career, although there

    seem to be far too many employers

    still willing to take a gamble on

    selecting new hires on just that

    premise.

    Applying more due diligence on both

    sides of the hiring equation will offer

    both parties the opportunity to focus

    on the most critical characteristics of

    their ideal catch. Patient exploration,

    spearing the trophy deals, makes

    much better sense than casting a net

    widely and then sorting through less

    suited options.

    Failure is the opportunity to

    begin again more intelligently.

    --HENRY FORD

    And, just in case you needed one

    more reminder:

    Become an informed voter and elect

    to vote for the candidates whom you

    discern can offer the healthiest

    solutions for all of us. Our future

    always depends upon your informed

    participation.

    The candidate needs to apply as

    much (some might say, even more)

    due diligence to the opportunity than

    does the hiring party. Surely, the

    hiring organizations suffer with

    unwise hires at times, but a candidate

    who errs in accepting a poorly fitting

    opportunity not only must deal withthe immediate fallout from the move,

    but career long as well. Departed

    employees find themselves under

    greater scrutiny about their past

    career decisions than do the

    organizations they had left.

    Candidates can frustrate their futures

    by electing to accept a move that is

    more the bird in the hand (shall we

    say: on a wing and a prayer?).

    The careful discernment of a targeted

    advancement move within a well-

    developed career rationale is wiser.

    Far too often, from both perspectives

    the employment engagement is a

    matter of casting a net widely, rather

    than spearing a trophy. Classic job

    search advice suggests that the wise

    candidates widely networking, or

    seeing whats out there, is their

    best way to go. Meanwhile, firms

    also cast a net widely, whether

    through recruiters or job postings,

    with both sides playing the odds that

    plenty of suitable and availablematches are poised for them to move

    on out in the world.

    Employers set their selection criteria

    for the resume screening process.

    Meanwhile, candidates too often are

    not so much electing their choice

    opportunity, but more commonly

    expend their energies far too widely,

    trying to avoid being overlooked.

  • 7/27/2019 Clarity News - Fall 2012

    2/2

    SUCCESSFUL SELECTIONClarity Back Issue Order Form

    Many times readers request previous issues ofClarity. If you are interested in free copies of any of the issues

    listed below related to Successful Selection, or others found on our complete Back Issues list atwww.judewerra.com, please contact us [email protected].

    (# of copies desired)

    Fall, 1994 Look Beyond Responsibilities, Look for Accomplishments! (READING RESUMES)

    Winter, 1996 Getting it in Writing Works Both Ways (MUTUAL

    EXPECTATIONS)

    Spring, 1996 Investment in People Starts With Due Diligence in Hiring (GOOD SELECTION PRACTICES)

    Summer, 1996 Make Sure a Job Offer Sends the Right Signals! (HANDLING JOB OFFERS)

    Fall, 1996 What is a Pilot Hole Hire? (POOR FIT HIRES)

    Winter, 1997 How do You Read a Resume? (READING RESUMES)

    Spring, 1997 The Pros and Cons of Using Multiple Screeners (INTERVIEWING TEAMWORK)

    Summer, 1997 Where Should I Probe in an Interview? (INTERVIEWING TIPS)

    Fall, 1997 You Interview TODAY, But Need a Fit for the FUTURE How do You do it? (INTERVIEWING TIPS)

    Winter, 1998 Rip van Winkle on Executive Selection (TRENDS IN EXECUTIVE HIRING)

    Spring, 1998 What Lies Beyond the Resume? (BACKGROUND CHECKING)

    Summer, 1999 Hiring The Least Worst Limits Future Results (HIRE THE BEST FIT)

    Winter, 1999 Executive Selection: The Next 15 Years (FUTURE TRENDS IN EXECUTIVE HIRING)

    Summer, 2000 There is a Difference Between Answers and Meaning (INTERVIEWING TIPS)

    Fall, 2000 Do You Know Murphys Law of Recruiting? (ACCELERATE SELECTION)

    Winter, 2001 How Stable is Your Center of Gravity? (RETAINING EMPLOYEES)

    Summer, 2001 Credibility Can Make or Break an Interview (INTERVIEWING TIPS)

    Spring, 2003 Why do Great Fits sometimes end in Great Mistakes? (CHOOSING LEADERS)

    Spring, 2004 Tis the Season to Spring Forward (CHOOSING LEADERS)

    Summer, 2005 When did you First Hear: Beggars cant be choosers? (CHOOSING LEADERS)

    Fall, 2005 Is Withholding Facts on a Resume a Sin of Omission? (READING RESUMES)

    Winter, 2006 New Year, New Friends (INTERVIEWING TIPS)

    Spring, 2006 A Good Reason Not to Hire Relatives (INTERVIEWING TIPS)

    Summer, 2006 What if the Electric Fence Isnt Turned On? (INTERVIEWING TIPS)

    Spring, 2007 Consider a Lesson on Hiring (364 Years Old) (CHOOSING LEADERS)

    Summer, 2007 The Talent Wars? A Perfect Storm (TRENDS IN EXECUTIVE HIRING)

    Fall, 2007 New Rules for the Talent Wars (TRENDS IN EXECUTIVE HIRING)

    Fall, 2012 Election vs. SelectionWhat a Difference an S Makes (CHOOSING LEADERS)

    LATEST ISSUE Liars Index News (LATEST DATA & SURVEY RESULTS)

    Jude M. Werra & Associates, LLC

    Bringing Clarity to Executive Selection

    We look forward to hearing from you [email protected]:

    Jude - Please call me, Id like to discuss an issue of concern

    Jude - Call me, I have a speaking engagement opportunity for you I have a colleague who would benefit from reading Clarity Please send me the Back Issues Ive selected

    We would appreciate your feedback on this latest issue ofClarity.

    Please email us [email protected]