Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
City Wide Social Survey Series 5
Dr. Christine S. Diaz
Ms. Mildred M. Estanda
Ms. Ma. Vanessa Amor E. Sobrejuanite
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Methodology
• CWSS 5 was conducted last May 25-30, 2016
• Face to Face interviews
• Random Sampling
±4 margin of error, 95% level of significance
• 630 adults in Davao City
3 Districts
11 Sub-districts
• Some questions of the survey were shared by SWS to Ateneo de Davao
University.
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Geographical Summaries
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
District 2
n=210
District 1
n=210
District 3
n=210
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Sub – District Number of
respondents
Poblacion 68
Talomo 142
Agdao 42
Bunawan 54
Buhangin 106
Paquibato 8
Baguio 20
Calinan 45
Marilog 25
Toril 71
Tugbok 49
Total 630
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Ensuring Integrity
of Data
1. Proper screening of enumerators & training.
2. Training of field supervisors.
3. Feedback mechanisms.
4. GIS-Geographic Information System
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
GIS – Geographic
Information
System
SDAPS
PLOTTING
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Outline of Presentation• Socio-Demographic Characteristics
• Household Facilities/Amenities
• Health
• Environment and Disaster preparednessPart 1
• Labor Force Status and Profile
• Financial Situation
• Self-Rated Poverty and Economic Trend Indicators
Part 2
• ASEAN 2015
• Peace and Order
• Social issues
• Governance and Post elections
• Happiness
Part 3
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
SOCIO DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Age Youngest: 18 years Oldest: 89 yearsMedian: 43 years old
3%
7%
10%
9%
13%
10%
9%
10%
9%
13%
3% 3%
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
18-19 20-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-70 71-75 76+
20%
71%
7%
Single Married Common Law
Civil Status
CLASS OF DWELLING
AB6%
C29%
D45%
E20%
6%
26%
45%
22%
8%
31%
46%
15%
4%
30%
45%
21%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
AB C D E
District 1
District 2
District 3
78%
1%
10% 9%
0% 2%
77%
3%6%
9%
1% 0%
78%
1%
10% 9%
0% 2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
Ownhousehold
Rights Renting Owned byrelatives
Owned byemployer
Owned bygovernment
District 1
District 2
District 3
Home Ownership
Lot Ownership Rental Fee (House and/or lot) per month:Ave: P4, 050Min: P100Max: P8, 000
52%
5%
15%10%
1%
11% 12%
32%
6% 4%7%
1%6% 7%
59%
5%7%
18%
2% 4% 3%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Own household Rights Renting Owned byrelatives
Owned byemployer
Owned bygovernment
Owned byother people
District 1
District 2
District 3
6%
10%
16%
28%
1%
5%
20%18%
7%8%
16%
22%
1%
8%
23%
14%
10%12%
14%
30%
3%
15% 15%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
No FormalEducation
SomeElementary
CompletedElementary
Some HighSchool
CompletedHigh School
SomeVocational
CompletedVocational
SomeCollege
CompletedCollege
PostCollege
District 1
District 2
District 3
Educational Attainment
86.03%
3.81%
3.33%3.17% 3.5%
Bisaya
Tagalog
kalagan
Cebuano
Others
Language Used at Home
37.46%
23.65%
6.83%
7.62%
1.90%
2.54%
1.90% 1.27%
1.59%
1.27%
1.43% 1.27%
11.20%
Dabawenyo
Cebuano
Ilongo
Boholano
Kagan
Bagobo
Bisaya
Waray
Kaulo
Surigaonon
Mandaya
Tagalog
Others
Ethnicity
Others:Bicolano, Aklanon,Batangueno,Dyangan,Klata,Leyteno,Manobo and Zamboangeno
74%
2%
5%
6%
13%
Roman Catholic
Iglesia ni Kristo
Protestant
Islam
others
Religion
Others: Adventist, Born Again, Alliance, Jehovah's Witness
HOUSEHOLD FACILITIES
Running water into the home
89%
80%
68%
11%
19%
31%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
District 1 District 2 District 3
YES
NO
95% Billed5% Not Billed
Water quality
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Better Same Worse Don’t know/cant tell
51%
42%
5%1%
41%
49%
10%
1%
50%
40%
8%
1%
District 1
District 2
District 3
Source of Drinking Water
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Gripo Delivery Spring Ulan Others
68%
20%
11%
5%
Gripo
Delivery
Spring
Ulan
Others
87%
13%
Household with rainwater collector
n=195
Yes
No
31%
69%
Yes No
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
District 1 District 2 District 3
20%27%
46%
80%73%
54%
Yes
No
Use of
Rainwater
12%
88%
Shared
Owned
Toilet
24%
75%
1% 1%
Flush
De-Buhos
Direstso sa kinalotnga Yuta
Diretso sa Tubig
Antipolo
others (Ilog)
Types of Toilet
Household Electricity Connection
Electric consumption:Median: P 925.00
Max: P 16 000
94%
5%
With Electricity
Without Electricity
Billed99%
Not Billed
1%
Light Source (5%):Kerosene, Solar, Genset and Candles
28%
38%
1%
26%
12%
7%3%
39%
45%
2%
17%
6% 5%3%
72%
17%
1%
13%
2%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Firewood Gas/LiquefiedPetroleum Gas
Kerosene Lamp Kahoy na Uling Bagol na Uling Butane Others (Bagaso,
Electricalcooking
apparatus)
District 1
District 2
District 3
Household Energy Sources
21%
79%
Yes No
Awareness on Renewable Energy
9%
91%
Yes No
For those who have telephone connection (n=58)
Telephone Connection
Cellular phone ownership
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
1 to 2 3 to 4 5+ None
73%
2% 1%
24%
16%
43%14%
12%
15%
Network subscription (n=607)
Globe
Smart
TnT
TM
ABS-CBNMobileSun
Number of household
members with cellular phones
n= 630
(%)
Less 5 83
5-8 13
9+ 2
No answer 2
TV and Cable Subscription
12.8%
87.2%
Cable
Without
cable
90%
10%
WithTelevision
WithoutTV
For those with television
n=567
59%
41%
Yes No
Radio Ownership
Television and radio usage
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Daily, 3+ hrs a
day
Daily,1-2 hrs a
day
Daily, less
than 1hr a day
A few days a
week
Never
68.9
19
5.9 5.3
0.9
36.3
26.3
9.9
23.7
3.8
TV
Radio
Vehicle Ownership
44
56
With Vehicle None
26.7
11.6
58.5
1.4
9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
4-wheeledVehicle
3-WheeledVehicle
2-WheeledVehicle
Banca Bicycle
Type of vehicle owned4-wheeled Vehicle 3-Wheeled Vehicle 2-Wheeled Vehicle Banca Bicycle
75%
9%2%
19%22%
8% 10%
2%
69%
10%3%
26%
36%
17%
7%2%
51%
1%
55%
22% 20%
3% 2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
District 1
District 2
District 3
Mode of Transportation
HEALTH
76%
24%
Yes No
Do you consider yourself healthy?
If yes, Reasons n=476
Absence of Illness 86%
Able to sleep well 12%
Absence of Problem 11%
Happy 9%
Has peace of mind 7%Good relationship with
community 6%
Contented with life 5%
Good attitude4%
others 4%
Have Money 1%
If No, Reasons n=152
Has illness 85%
Has problem 5%others (Old age,
unhealthy lifesyle, just recently underwent a
surgery)
5%
Does not have money 3%
Cannot sleep well 1%
No peace of mind 1%
Not contented with life0%
40%
60%
Yes No
Family Members who got sick for the past 6 months
Family member who got sick in the last 6 months
n=254
Mother31%
Son 28%
Daughter25%
Father20%
33%
18%
36%
2%
6%
9%
8%
1%
1%
3%
3%
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40%
Ubo
Sip-on
Kalintura
Diarrhea
Hubak
High Blood
Diabetes
Sakit sa panit
Sakit sa atay
Sakit sa bato
Sakit sa baga Ubo
Sip-on
Kalintura
Diarrhea
Hubak
High Blood
Diabetes
Sakit sapanit
Illness of family members who got sickn=254
How was the
sickness cured?n=254
Sought Medical
Help 74%
Self Medicates26%
Albularyo3%
Ignored the Illness2%
Went to the Health
Center 2%
49%
37%40%
5%
10%
5% 2% 1%
5%
52%
42%
40%
2%
13%
6%
61%
30%
46%
4%
8% 7%
5%1%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Ubo Sip-on Kalintura Diarrhea Hubak High Blood Diabetes Sakit sa panit Sakit sa atay Sakit sa bato Sakit sa baga
District 1
District 2
District 3
Common Illnesses in the Community
Air Cleanliness
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Better Same Worse Don’t know/can’t tell
43%40%
16%
1%
39%43%
17%
1%
51%
33%
14%
1%
District 1
District 2
District 3
79%
21%
Yes No
84%
18%
Yes No
Awareness of HIV Prevalence in Davao City(n=498)
Awareness on HIV
51%48% yes
no
Awareness of Testing Facilities
Sources of Informationn= 218
(%)
TV 77
Radio 14
Health Center 12
Neighbors 11
Internet 6
Newspaper 5
DISASTER PREPAREDNESS
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Hazards in the community
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Flood
Drought
Ipo-Ipo
Landslide
none
Fire
typhoon
others
48%
6%
1%
39%
10%
3%
3%
38%
8%
1%
6%
52%
10%
3%
3%
36%
19%
1%
11%
42%
10%
3%
3%
District 3
District 2
District 1
Others:brownout,balod, earthquake, liki sa dalan
25%
75%
Participated in Disaster Training
yes no
Training Provider( multiple response)
n=158
Barangay 61911 15School 8Red cross 9Workplace 7
Others ( church, NGOs)7
Drills given in the community( multiple response)
n=157
Fire drill 57
Earthquake drill 52
Tsunami drill 11
Storm drill 14
flood drill 38
Violence response 6
First Aid 7
Disaster orientation, response, prevention
8
Preparation for disaster (multiple response)
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
Stock foodand water
Stockcandles,
Flashlight
Made houserepairs
Radio tofollow news
Safe place torelocate
Stockmaterials for
flood
46%48%
25%
30%
14%
23%
Stock food and water
Stock candles, Flashlight
Made house repairs
Radio to follow news
Safe place to relocate
Stock materials for flood
Satisfaction with Disaster Services
Very satisfied (%)Somewhat Satisfied(%)
Somewhat dissatisfied (%)
Very Dissatisfied (%)
Church 58.4 18.7 3.2 4.0
PNP58.3 17.0 3.8 3.8
City Govt55.4 23.5 3.2 5.9
DSWD52.9 18.3 6.0 5.6
Brgy Official 42.7 27.8 7.9 10.3
Private organization 30.5 22.1 7.5 8.9
DPWH 22.7 6.2 5.9 5.9
ENVIRONMENT
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Climate change management initiatives
Series1
0%
20%
40%
60% 51%
28%45%
21% 23%19% 19%
Waste segregation
Recycling
Tree Planting
No burn Trash
No burn Plastic
Conserve electricity
Conserve water
Cleanliness of Davao City
76%
20%
2% 1%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
Better Same Worse Don’t know/cant tell
Better
Same
Worse
Don’t know/cant tell
Awareness on Watershed Protection, Conservation and Management Ordinance of Davao City
41%
59%
Yes No
City’s Perceived Compliance on Watershed Protection, Conservation and Management Ordinance of Davao Cityn= 258
59%
41%
Yes
No
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Strongly agree Agree Disagree StronglyDisagree
Don’t Know
30%
41%
21%
4% 4%
42%
49%
5%
1%3%
39%
52%
4%3%
38%
47%
9%
2% 4%
Our water source in Davao City willnot be depleted.
There is a need to rehabilitate ourwatershed .
I have responsibility in rehabilitatingthe water source .
I am willing to pay for therehabilitation of our watershed .
Perception on Watershed Protection
Who has the greatest responsibility to rehabilitate watershed?
n= 630
(%)
Ordinary Citizens 42.4
LGU 32.7
Nat'l Govt 25.2
DCWD 1.6
Others ( Myself, God, DENR) 0.5
Heard about Organic Products?
66%
34%
Yes
No
31%
69%
Buy organicProducts
Do not buyorganic products
Purchase of Organic Products
Organic products
Type of organic productsn=130 Where the product is purchased? n=130
Vegetables 62 Specialty Store 27
Fruits 28 Supermarket 28
Rice 20 Market ( Bankerohan, Calinan, Panabo,
Agdao) 15Pork Meat 5Organic Bazaar 14
Fertilizers10 Neighborhood ( Backyard gardening) 7
Organic beverages and
medicines 5Direct Supplier ( Farm, Farmers
association 3Chicken Meat
4others ( online, friends, delivery) 3Eggs
2
Others2
LABOR FORCE STATUS AND PROFILE
Work Status
40.0%
50.0%
10.0%
47.0% 39.0% 14.0%
40.5%
44.8%
13.3%
Has a job Does not have a jobright now but had a
job before
Never had a job
District 1 District 2 District 3
27%
52%
67%
58%
38%32%
Has a job Does not have ajob right nowbut had a job
before
never had a job
FEMALE MALE
11.50%
5.40% 5.40%
77.70%
0.00%
10.00%
20.00%
30.00%
40.00%
50.00%
60.00%
70.00%
80.00%
90.00%
1-3 months 4-6 months 6-12months
more thana year ago
Last time Davaoeño had job (n=278)
40.23
59.77
yes no
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Not working but looking for work (n=348
1.4
25.5
11.5
1
41.3
7.2
2.4
4.3
1.4
0 10 20 30 40 50
Waiting to be called back for theOLD job
Too young/too old
Retired
Physically handicapped
Busy with Household chores
Schooling
Tired of looking for a job
Problem with Health
Pregnancy
Reason for not looking for Job (n= 208)
12.6
3
3.7
23
6.7
48.1
3
0 10 20 30 40 50
never had a job before
did not voluntarily leave job
Laid off from work
contract ended, not renewed
employer closed operations
voluntarily left old job
waiting for result of application
Classification of looking for work (n=135)
60
40
yes
no
Available to have a job in the next two weeks (n=167)
84
16
yes
no
Willing to start a job in the next two weeks (n=106)
Among those working (n= 270)
53.6
42.7
2.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
29.73
34.45
28.57
39.86
32.77
42.86
30.4132.77 28.57
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
45.00
Hired Self-employed Unpaid family worker
District 1 District 2 District 3
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14%
Construction ( carpenters, mason, welder, machine…
Online and computer servicing
Vending
Service Provider ( Manicure, pedicure, laborer,…
Farming ( farmers, farm laborers, etc)
Government Employees
Licensed ( Engrs. Teachers )
Others
Driver
Security (security guard, military auxiliaries)
Teacher
Proprietor( Business owners, sari-sari store)
Sales ( Agents, sales lady, Bantay Tindahan)
Self-employment ( Photogrpaher, lanscape artists, )
Private employees
8%
2%
4%
8%
11%
6%
6%
2%
13%
5%
2%
9%
8%
8%
8%
MAIN OCCUPATION
Type of Employment n % %
Private Enterprise 100 38.61
REHISTRADO 99
HINDI REHISTRADO 1
Self-Employed 119 45.95
REHISTRADO 20.72
HINDI REHISTRADO 79.27
Government 33 12.74
Unpaid Family Worker 7 2.7
0 10 20 30 40 50
professional/technician
Manager
Community worker
clerical/admin/sales
refused to answer/noanswer
Non Agri/Skilled
Agriculture
Blue Collar
22.3
0.7
7.4
10.1
2.7
6.8
5.4
44.6
If hired, what type of work (n=140)
sari-sari store + Vegetable store
24%
Vending (food,catering, fish)
14%
(Ukay-ukay +online Business)
3%
Farming23%
Driving16%
Service(vulcanizing, manicure, pedicure, painting,
landscaping, dressmaking/tail
oring)13%
Others7%
Type of Business of the self-employed (n=119)
0
20
40
60
80
100
SSS PhilHealth Pag-Ibig
24
32.5
13.3
76
67.5
86.7
YES NO
Whether Davaoeño paid…
Benefit received in the past three months (multiple response)
29.1
31.1
8.8
53.4
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Regular Salary Increase
Productivity Bonus
Additional Benefits
No benefits at all
35.1
64.9
yes
no
Wanted to increase working hours? (n=262)
Min. number of hours of work: 1Maxi. number of hours of work: 168Median: 48
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
yes no
26%
74%
Whether looking for additional Work (n=270)
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60%
Need more income
Numerous loans
Can not buy my NEEDS
Can not spend for liesure
I have maintenance for illness
I have obligation
33%
4%
55%
55%
3%
16%
Reasons for looking additional work (multiple response)
67%
12%
6%
15%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
More No change Fewer Jobs Refused toAnswer
Perceived availability of Jobs next year
25.221.7
47.8
5.2
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Easy to find Neither easynor hard to
find
Hard to find Don't Know
Ease or difficulty in finding a Job today
22.54%
77%
Yes
No
0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Aspiration to live abroadYes
No
14.3%
85.6%
Yes
No
0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% 80.0% 100.0%
Looking for a job abroad YesNo
49%
21%
20%
10%
Easy to find
Neither easy nor hard to find
Hard to find
DK/no answr
Easy to find Job inDavao City in 12 months
OFW Family
20%
78%
2%
Yes No No answer 4
9
22
34
31
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
Father Mother Son Daughter Others
Others: aunt/uncle, in-laws, grand children
20.8%
51.2%
4.0%
16.8%
7.2%
How Hired?n=125
Direct Hiring
Agency
Walk-in
Referral
others (DK, Marriage,Descendants)
Agency Fee: Median: P 30,000Max amount: P 200,000
Singapore and
Malaysia
Japan and
Korea
UAE,
Kuwait and
Saudi
Arabia
USA and
Canada
In what country are they
working?
North America
22%
Europe
5%East Asia
14%
Middle East
50% Southeast Asia 8%
Seafarer
2%
France and
London
41%
25%
10%
23%
Often Sometimes Seldom Never
Frequency of sending remittance (n=125)
Remittance
Allocation
(n=125)
Food 60.2%
Utilities 53.7%
Education 41.5%
Health 22.8%
Transportation 19.5%
Payment for Loans 13%
Savings 10.6%
Entertainment 10.6%
Others 4.1%
Monthly Family Income
Median: P9,100Max: P400, 000
Monthly Individual Income
Median: P5,500Max: P340, 000
Income Allocation (n=148)
Food 93.8
Utilities 77.9
Education 58.3
Transportation 41.9
Payment for Loans 21.4
Health 18.4
Savings 15.9
Entertainment 11.6
Others 4.1
FINANCIAL SITUATION
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70%
Income is not enough
Just enough
With savings
27%
61%
12%
Financial Situation in the past three months
87
13
Yes No
Efforts to reduce Expenditure (n=148)
12%
37%
3%
2%
13%
33%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40%
Past savings
Loans
Government
Private Firms
Relatives
Sideline
Sources of additional funding (n=148)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Income notenough
Just enough With savings
19.5
60
20.5
15.7
50.4
8.7
2.6
17.4
9.6
Past savings Loans Government
Private assist Relatives Sideline
Perceived financial situation in the next three months
Source of funds for next three months (multiple response)
Financial Assistance received
12%6%
16%3%
3%
4%
64%
57%
Money Money (loaned/borrowed)
Food Non- Food
Job Schooling Support
Any Service None
57
43 yes
no
Had loan in the past year
How many loans last year?
Minimum: 1Maximum: 365Median: 2
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Money
Goods / Appliances
Food
Equipment for busness
79%
9%
14%
1%What is loaned? (multiple response)
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25%
Cooperative
Bank
Credit card
SSS/GSIS/PAG-IBIG
Paluwagan
others (Motorcyle shop, sari sari store)
Friends
Five six
Microfinance
20%
5%
1%
4%
5%
5%
24%
24%
12%
Who is the lender (n= 360)
81.5
18.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Yes No
Borrow from cooperative (n=114)
18
82
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Yes No
Member of a cooperative
78.4
24.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Personal Business
Purpose of borrowing (n=114)
8
92
Yes
No
Attempted to loan from the bank
25
75
Yes
No
Refused by the bank (n=52)
4
96
Yes
No
Whether with credit cards
Minimum: 1Maximum: 6
0 20 40 60 80
Personal
Gadget
Travel
Clothes
Food
Business
Equipment
Travel
75
8
17
17
33
46
13
4Use of credit cards (n=24)
34%
66%
Yes No
Whether with savings
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
31%
12%
3%
53%
1%
Where the savings are placed (n=213)
10
9
16
71
1
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
others ( for the future, self, driverslicense, entertainment
For emergency purposes
Investment
Education
Business
Reason for saving (multiple response)
13.9
58.5
27.4
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Can notsave
Not easynor difficult
to save
Difficult tosave
Perception on savings in the next three months (n=213)
10.5
20.8
44.9
23.5
19.7
4.8
6.2
1.7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Arts and crafts
Mech Skills
carpentry
automotive
entreprenurial
computer programming
food technology
computer secretarial
30.6
1.6
31.9
41.1
water mineral land Don't Know
Common skills in the community (multiple response)Resources in the community
35
7
2
10
6
34
3
3
41
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Agricultural
fishery
forestry
industry
manufacturing
construction
communication
finance
small scale business
Usual sources of income in the community
22
78
Yes NO
Whether a training on business was given in the community
11.8
64
5.1
2.9
14.7
9.6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
NGO
Barangay
academe
church
private
Government ( TESDA, DOLE, DTI,Military, DSWD [4Ps])
Who provided the training?
VII- SELF-RATED POVERTY
Perceived poverty status
3 3 3.2 3 5.6
82 8086 84
80.7
15 1711 13
13.7
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS 3 CWSS 4 CWSS 5
Not poor On the line Poor
Perceived poverty status across districts
8.65.7
2.2
82.980.5 78.5
8.613.3
18.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
District 1 District 2 District 3
Not poor On the line Poor
Desired Minimum monthly income: Ave: P12,317
Experience Hunger
17.3
82.7
Yes NO
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
District 1 District 2 District 3
16 14
21.4
84 86
77.6
Yes NO
Experience Hunger across Districts
Past six months there is a widening gap between the rich and poor
33
47.5
13.2
2.24.1
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Stronglyagree
agree disagree Stronglydisagree
DK
Responsibility of Davao City local government to close the gap
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Stronglyagree
moderatelyagree
moderatelydisagree
stronglydisagree
CWSS 3
CWSS 4
CWSS 5
ECONOMIC TREND INDICATOR
Quality of Life
24%22.10%
33%
25.80%
34.0%
51% 50.20%
43%
51.90%
45.1%
23%26.40%
24%
22.30% 20.0%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS3 CWSS 4 CWSS5
Better now than 6 months ago Same as before Worse now than 6 months ago
Quality of Life in three Districts
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
Better now than 6months ago
Same as before Worse now than 6months ago
Don’t know refused toanswer/no answer
33.8
48.1
18.1
4041.4
17.6
1
28.1
44.76
24.29
1.43 0.48
District 1
District 2
District 3
Personal optimism
3632.7
44.8 45.4
50
35
43.3 42
47.1
32
14 12.7 13.2
7.650
10
20
30
40
50
60
CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS 3 CWSS 4 CWSS 5
Will be better Same Will be worse
51%
41.20%
57%54.90%
73%
36%
42.60%
33%
38.50%
14%12%16.20%
9%6.60%
2%0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
CWSS 1 CWSS 2 CWSS3 CWSS 4 CWSS5
Will be better Same Will be worse
Perception on the local economy
ASEAN INTEGRATION 2015
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
ASEAN Integration
ASEAN Integration will have positive effect on Mindanao? n = 119
77.30%
6.70%
16%
Agree
Disagree
Don't know
19%
81%
yes
no
Awareness on ASEAN Integration n = 630
ASEAN Integration
Mindanao is ready for ASEAN Integration
69.70%
12.60%
17.70%
Agree
Disagree
Don't know
Greatest threat to Peace and Order
22%
17%
17%
14%
13%
10%
7%
Drugs
Killings
Poverty
Criminal Incidents
Davao Death Squad
Calamity
Terrorism
Highly complied ordinances
80.50%82.90%
69.00%
83.30%80.50%
76.70%
70.50% 71.00%
62.90%
73.80%76.70%
68.10%
84.30% 85.70%
79.50%
District 1 District 2 District 3
Anti
discrimination
ordinance
Women's
Development
Code Ordinance
Anti-smoking
ordinance
Liquor Ban
Ordinance
Anti-Nuisance
Ordinance
Least Complied Ordinances
Halal Food Certification Ordinance 24.6%
Rainwater Harvesting Ordinance 41.1%
Speed Limit Ordinance 47.6%
Improvement on Infrastructure and Social Services
48.6%43.2% 43.2% 35.6%
30% 34% 32% 29%
53%
32.1%34.8% 31.3%
30.0%32%
34% 36%28%
31%
11.1% 13.7% 13.8%14.0%
15%15% 13%
15%
5%
5.7% 6.3% 8.1% 10.6% 14% 11% 13% 14%7%
Roads,
Bridges,
Drainage
Public
School
Public
Hospital
Public
Parks
Electric
Power
Garbage
Disposal
Transport
services
Traffic
system
911
Services
Huge improvement Somewhat better Same Worsen
GOVERNANCE
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Satisfaction on Performance of Government Officials
42% 45%49% 48.10%
51%
83%
99%91% 90% 87%
58% 55%51% 51% 50%
17%
1%9% 10%
13%
Satisfied Not Satisfied
Satisfaction on Performance of Government Officials
Satisfied%
Not Satisfied%
Net Satisfaction%
Pres. Benigno Aquino 42 58 -16
National Administration 45 55 -10
Senate 49 51 -2
Supreme Court 48 51 -3
House of Representatives 51 50 1
District Representative 83 17 66
Mayor Rodrigo Duterte 99 1 98
Vice Mayor Pulong Duterte 91 9 82
Davao City Council 90 10 80
Barangay Officials 87 13 74
Davao City local government addresses
concerns of ordinary people
90%
5% 5%
Agree
Disagree
No opinion
Is there a fair justice system in the Philippines?
4%
68%
28%
yes no don't know
Opinion about Davao Death Squad
8% 8% 10%
2%
60%
12%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
against humanrights
unjust just immoral will help solvecriminality
others
Opinion about Davao Death Squad
8% 9%10%
2%
58%
13%
7% 7%10%
2%
63%
11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
against human
rights
unjust just immoral can solve
criminality
others
male female
SOCIAL ISSUES
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Important Social Issues Davao City
n=630%
District 1n=210
%
District 2n=210
%
District 3n=210
%
1Corruption 61.0
56.21st
66.7
3rd
59.01st
2Unemployment 60.0
54.82nd
68.6
2nd
56.22nd
3Drugs 59.2
53.33rd
69.5
1st
54.83rd
4 HIV-AIDS 54.9 49.0 62.4 52.9
5
Environmental Protection
54.450.0 61.0 51.9
6 Access to justice 52.1 45.7 60.0 50.0
Common Good
72.4%
57.8%
42.2%
49.4% 51.7%
41.6%
Availability of job Availability offood
no poverty there is peace equal opportunityfor development
there is unity
POST ELECTIONS
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Electoral Participation
74%
26%
Voted last May 2016
n=630
Yes No
42%
34%
62%
44% 44%
7%
Voting is a wayto speak my
mind
One vote reallycounts
Voting caneffect change
Voting is mypublic duty
I want toexercise myright to vote
I'm interestedin politics
Reasons for votingn=468
Reasons for not votingn=162
2%
6%
5%
5%
2%
29%
14%
6%
5%
54%
vote will not make a difference
parties/candidates are the same
not interested in politics
not enough information
candidates do not represent my issues
name is not on the voter's list
no time
lines are too long
don't like the candidates
not registered
Perception on May 2016 Election
Agree96%
Disagree1%
Don’t know
3%
The election in Davao City was peaceful
Agree56%
Disagree39%
Don't know
5%
The election in Mindanao was peaceful
Perception on May 2016 Election
95%
1%
4%Agree
Disagree
Don'tknow
The election in Davao City was orderlyn=468
The election in Mindanao was orderly
56%40%
4%Agree
Disagree
Don'tknow
The election in Mindanao was orderlyn=468
Perception on May 2016 Election
88%
6% 6%
Agree
Disagree
Don't know
The COMELEC in Davao City was credible
88%
6%6%
Agree
Disagree
Don't know
The COMELEC in Davao City was competent
Perception on May 2016 Election
81%
4%15% Agree
Disagree
Don't know
BEIs were very helpful during the election
81%
5% 14%Agree
Disagree
Don't know
Poll watchers were effective in their duty
Perception on May 2016 Election
75%
13%
12%
Agree
Disagree
Don't know
VCM made the voting process efficient
92%
4% 4%
Agree
Disagree
Don't know
Election results were released in a timely manner
Perception on May 2016 Election
92%
4% 4%
Agree Disagree Don't know
Election results truly reflected the will of the Filipinos
86%
2%12%
Agree
Disagree
Don't know
I believe the new administration will value my vote
Perception on May 2016 Election
95.10%
0.20%4.70%
Agree Disagree Don't know
I am more hopeful after the election
Voter’s Choice for President
99%
1%
Rodrigo Duterte others
Whom did you vote as President last May 9, 2016?
n=468
Others: Grace Poe, Mar Roxas, Jejomar Binay, Miriam Santiago
67%
20%
76%
5%
3%
51%
track record
academic qualification
leadership abilities
candidate's political party
endorsement of outgoingPresident
platforms
What made you decide to vote the preferred presidential candidate?
Voter’s Choice for Vice President
9%
29%
60%
0% 0% 2%
Whom did you vote as vice president last May 9, 2016?
Robredo
Marcos
Cayetano
Trillanes
Honasan
Escudero
52%
22%
54%
14%
5%
44%
16%
Reasonsn=465
When in i t ia l and f ina l dec is ion to vote the preferred pres ident was made
Initial decision %
Final decision%
On filing of Candidacy 75 69
3 months before election 5.6 6.9
2 months before election 3.2 3.9
3 weeks before election 5.3 3.9
2 weeks before election 1.5 1.1
1 week before election 0.9 2.4
night before election 3.4 5.4
day of Election , outside precinct 1.7 3.0
day of election, inside precinct 1.3 2.4
NA 0.6 1.5
Refused to answer 19.2 19.1
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Voter’s considerations in making the final decision
53.80%
46.70%
41.90%
22.20%
19.40%
19.40%
7.70%
7.50%
2.20%
1.30%
Candidate’s stand on issues
Perception about the candidate
Leadership abilities
Candidate promotes my priority issues
Candidate’s better chances of winning
My region/province
Others' perception of candidate
Family/peer influence
Church endorsement
Party affiliation
39%
27.30%
24.50%
21.30%
17.90%
16.40%
8.10%
8.10%
7.70%
7%
6.20%
4.70%
3.20%
2.10%
Television
Political debates
Political advertisements
Family
Political Surveys
Social media
Campaign flyers
Local talk/ tsismis
Friends
Miting de avance
Campaign sorties
Church
Voters' education
Celebrity endorsement
What influenced voter’s final decision?
Willingness to support the new President
Yes, 98.9%
no , 0.2% Don't know, 0.5%Refused to answer,
0.5%0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
Yes no Don't know Refused to answer
Type of support committed for the President
62%
38%
25%
40%
63%66%
35%
26%
36%
65%
58%
41%
23%
44%
61%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Participate inintiatives for
common good
Will notencourage
corrupt practice
Pay my taxes Not involve incriminal activities
Will not violateordinances and
laws
Davao City
Female
Male
Political actions of the incoming President that will disappoint supporters
73%
29%
27%
27%
19%
7%
13%
10%
3%
corruption
cannot address peace and order
lack of transparency
cannot generate employment
cannot stop criminality against persons
cannot stop criminality against property
cannot address discrimination
failure to make admin officials accountable
refused to answer
HAPPINESS
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Extent of Happiness
Ateneo de Davao University
E. Jacinto St.
With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
Administered by:
Social Research Training and Development Office (SRTDO)
Not happy at all Not totally happy Moderately happy Extremely happy
Legend:
= 10%
= 1%
1.1%
2.4%
62.7%
33.8%
Reasons for Happiness
relationshipwith friends
relationshipwith
community
relationshipwith family
health position atwork
religion sense of selfworth
71%
15%8% 8% 8% 6%
2%
The City Wide Social Survey Series 5With Funding Support from the
University Research Council (URC)
and
Administered by the
Social Research Training and Development Office
Ateneo de Davao University
Thank You!