Upload
others
View
9
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Page 1
Chuck Eesley Stanford University
Copyright © 2009 by the Board of Trustees of the Leland Stanford Junior University and Stanford Technology Ventures Program (STVP). This document may be
reproduced for educational purposes only.
Page 2
Introduce Stewart Alsop, David Morgenthaler
OAP Presentations Team exercise Wrap-up WebTV/Partnerships
Page 3
Partner at Alsop Louie Partners was a general partner with New Enterprise
Associates investments in TiVo, Portola Communications
(sold to Netscape), Netcentives, Glu Mobile, and Xfire
wrote a column for Fortune Editor in Chief of InfoWorld, a weekly
newspaper for information-technology professionals.
published PC Letter, a fortnightly newsletter for computer industry insiders,
Executive editor at Inc. magazine
Page 4
Founding Partner at K9 Ventures Founded 2 successful ventures Founder and CEO at SneakerLabs, Inc. CEO iMeet E.piphany Carnegie Mellon, Stanford CS Ph.D.
Page 5
SB and SM from MIT in Mech. Eng. J.H. Whitney Foseco CEO Founder of Morgenthaler Ventures Invested in Apple (just sold Siri to Apple) Founding Director of the NVCA Reformed ERISA law to help grow/establish VC
industry Multiple lifetime achievement awards Sponsor of the MIT 100k and Stanford E-
Challenge
Page 7
1. Chance to improve the productivity and
effectiveness of your team.
2. Reinforces the importance of teamwork in
new ventures.
Page 8
• Purpose and Objectives
• Step #1: Team Process Evaluation Sheet
• Step #2: Preparation for Team Exercise
• Step #3: Team Exercise on Your Own
Page 10
1. Circle the two highest scores (or “I like” …).
2. Circle the two lowest scores (or “I wish” …).
3. Write down one thing that you would do differently or better to improve the functionality of your group.
Page 12
Six distinct states are identified and assigned a color: Questions (White) - considering purely what information
is available, what are the facts? Emotions (Red) - instinctive gut reaction or statements of
emotional feeling (but not any justification) Bad points judgment (Black) - logic applied to identifying
flaws or barriers, seeking mismatch, critical thinking Good points judgment (Yellow) - logic applied to
identifying benefits, seeking harmony Creativity (Green) - statements of provocation and
investigation, seeing where a thought goes Thinking (Blue) - thinking about thinking, process
orientation
Page 13
Perlman – get prior employers to pay for your R&D!
Connections at partner organizations (Bonan)
Beware not understanding your partners’ incentives
– Asymmetric timeframes, approaches to risk (CE)
Understand how VC works (no NDAs) Where are the users/customers? Timing – sequence of decisions
– Financial desperation kicks in – Technological lead vs. competitors