Upload
preston-morgan
View
212
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Christina Basin Trends,1995-2010
• Population
• Land Use
• Water Quality
• Water Temperature
• Streamflow
Compiled by A. Homsey, S. Chatterson, E. McVey.
S. Mack, M. Narvaez, and G. Kauffman (University of Delaware)
Christina Basin Clean Water Partnership
Policy CommitteeDRBC, USEPA, Del. DNREC, Pa. DEP
Coordinating CommitteeDel. Co-coordinator: DNS, WRA
Pa. Co-coordinator: CCWRA, CCCD
Task ForceChair: BVA
Interstate• Brandywine Conservancy• Brandywine Valley Association (BVA)• Delaware River Basin Commission (DRBC)• Partnership for the Delaware Estuary• Red Clay Valley Association (RCVA)• United States Department of Agriculture
Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS)
• United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA)
• United States Geological Survey (USGS)• United States National Park Service (NPS)• White Clay Creek Watershed Association• White Clay Creek Wild and Scenic
Watershed Management Committee
Pennsylvania• Chester County Conservation
District (CCCD)• Chester County Health
Department• Chester County Planning
Commission• Chester County Water Resources
Authority (CCWRA)• Pennsylvania Department of
Conservation and Natural Resources (Pa. DCNR)
• Pennsyvlania Department of the Environment (Pa. DEP)
Delaware• Christina Conservancy• City of Newark• City of Wilmington• Delaware Department of
Natural Resources and Environmental Control (DNREC)
• Delaware Nature Society (DNS)• New Castle Conservation
District• New Castle County Dept. of
Special Services• University of Delaware, Institute
for Public Administration, Water Resources Agency (WRA)
Partner Organizations
Ad Hoc Committees (as needed)
Christina Basin Population
Source: U. S. Census
Christina Basin Population, 2010
Brandywine Cr.246,702, 42%
White Clay Cr. 123,506, 21%
Red Clay Cr. 46,893, 8%
Christina R. 174,196, 29%
Christina BasinPopulation Change, 2000-2010
10,723
31,091
4260
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
Delaware Pennsylvania Maryland
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
ang
e
Christina BasinPopulation Change, 2000-2010
25,289
7,7614,263 4,927
42,240
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
BrandywineCreek
ChristinaRiver
Red ClayCreek
White ClayCreek
ChristinaBasin
Po
pu
lati
on
ch
an
ge
Christina BasinPopulation Change, 2000-2010
3,3393,228
5,7827,204
1,035426131
-855
21,950
-5,000
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Whi
te C
lay
(DE)
Chr
istin
a (P
A)
Chr
istin
a (M
D)
Red
Cla
y (D
E)
Red
Cla
y (P
A)
Bra
ndyw
ine
(DE)
Whi
te C
lay
(PA
)
Chr
istin
a (D
E)B
rand
ywin
e (P
A)
-3,500
-2,500
-1,500
-500
500
1,500
2,500
3,500
C6 Tida
l Chr
istina
R.
W5 M
ill Cre
ek
R5 be
low W
oodd
ale
C2 M
uddy
Run
R4 ab
ove W
oodd
ale
W8 a
bove
New
ark
B6 Doe
Run
W10
Tida
l Whi
te C
lay C
r.
R3 Burro
ughs
Run
B7 Bro
ad C
reek
B1 W
B Hon
ey Bro
ok
B5 Buc
k Run
R2 East
Branc
h
R4 ab
ove W
oodd
ale
W2 M
iddle
Bra
nch
B3 W
B Coa
tesv
ille
B17 th
roug
h W
ilming
ton
W6 P
ike C
reek
W4 E
B below
Avo
ndal
e
R1 W
est B
ranch
C2 M
uddy
Run
B12 B
eave
r Cre
ek
B14 a
bove
Cha
dds
Ford
B13 V
alley
Cre
ek
Christina BasinPopulation Change, 2000-2010
Christina Basin Land Use
Source: NOAA CSC
Christina BasinLand Use, 2005
Urban/Suburban
28%Forest/Wetland
33%
Ag38%
Water1%
Brandywine CreekLand Use 2005
Urban/Suburban
18%
Agriculture
46%
Forest/Wetland
36%
Water1%
Red Clay CreekLand Use 2005
Urban/Suburban
27%
Water1%
Agriculture
39%
Forest/Wetland
33%
White Clay Creek Land Use 2005
Urban/Suburban
34%
Agriculture
36%
Forest/Wetland,
30%
Water0%
Christina RiverLand Use 2005
Urban/Suburban
58%
Agriculture15%
Forest/Wetland
26%
Water1%
Christina BasinLand Use Change, 1996 - 2005
9.61
- 3.06
- 6.7210
8
6
4
2
0
2
4
6
8
10
Are
a (s
q m
i)
Urban/Suburban Agriculture Forest/Wetland
Christina BasinLand Use Change, 1995 - 2010
5
4
3
2
1
0
1
2
3
4
5
Brandywine Christina Red Clay White Clay
Are
a (
sq
mi)
Urban/Suburban Agriculture Forest/Wetland
Christina Basin Land Useby State and Watershed, 2005
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
Brandywine DE
Brandywine PA
Christina DE
Christina MD
Christina PA
Red Clay DE
Red Clay PA
White Clay DE
White Clay PA
Are
a (
sq
mi)
Urban/Suburban Agriculture Forest/Wetland
Christina Basin Water Quality
• Dissolved Oxygen
• Total Suspended Sediment
• Enterococcus Bacteria
• Nitrogen
• Phosphorus
Source: DNREC STORET Monitoring Stations
Brandywine Cr. at Footbridge (104011)Red Clay Cr. at Stanton (103011)White Clay Cr. at Old Rte 7 Br. (105071)Christina R. at Wilmington (106291)
Water Temperature
Streamflow
• Annual Low Flow (Drought)
• Annual Peak Flow (Flood)
Brandywine Creek at Wilmington Annual Low Streamflow
52
121
98
121
52
137
90
119
204
90
124
94 98
198
35
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
200
220
1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Str
ea
mfl
ow
(c
fs)
7Q10
1%
10%
Red Clay Creek at StantonAnnual Low Streamflow
7
39
17
12
8
18
14
7
28
40
18
24
16 17
21
0
10
20
30
40
501
99
5
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
Str
ea
mfl
ow
(c
fs)
7Q10
Red Clay Creek at StantonAnnual Peak Streamflow
1,850
5,330
1,370
8,260
4,200
3,140
864
17,400
10,900
3,780
5,000
3,0502,170
800
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,0001
99
5
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
Str
ea
mfl
ow
(c
fs)
10%
1%
White Clay Creek near NewarkAnnual Low Streamflow
8.5
54
23 22
9.3
30
21
5.4
44
86
2530
18 18
42
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
19
95
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
Str
ea
mfl
ow
(c
fs)
7Q10
White Clay Creek near NewarkAnnual Peak Streamflow
9,150
5,540
2,050
7,130
4,970
1,270
13,900
5,6004,630 4,390
5,090
1,9202,8703,160
19,500
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,0001
99
5
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
Str
ea
mfl
ow
(c
fs) 1%
10%
Christina River at Coochs BridgeAnnual Low Flow
1.6
8.3
3.7
2.4
1.1
3.7
1.41
3.4
12
3.4
5.9
2.12.5
5.9
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Str
ea
mfl
ow
(c
fs)
7Q10
Christina River at Coochs BridgeAnnual Peak Streamflow
1,790 1,910 1,8401,500
7,050
2,1302,350
629
2,340
5,430
1,910 1,9901,770
1,0801,330
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000
6,000
7,000
8,0001
99
5
19
96
19
97
19
98
19
99
20
00
20
01
20
02
20
03
20
04
20
05
20
06
20
07
20
08
20
09
Str
ea
mfl
ow
(c
fs)
1%
10%
Summary
• Water quality improvements are congruent with 15-year contributions of CBCWP.
• Water quality has improved even with 42,000 increase in population (2000-2010) and 9 mi2 increase in urban/suburban land (1996-2005).
• Nitrogen levels are degrading probably due to atmospheric deposition (not good) and/or conversion of ammonia to forms of N with rising DO levels (a good thing!).
• No low flows since drought of 2002.