View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Lipids in T1D and T2DLipids in T1D and T2D
T1DT1D T2DT2D
TCTC N N
LDL-CLDL-C N N
HDL-CHDL-C N or
TGTG N or
Qualitative Qualitative changeschanges
?Small dense LDL particles
CHD mortality rises in line with total cholesterolCHD mortality rises in line with total cholesterol
1
10
100
3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0
Total cholesterol (mmol/l)
An
nu
al a
ge-
stan
dar
dis
ed C
HD
mo
rtal
ity
(%)
Stamler J, Wentworth D, Neaton JD. Stamler J, Wentworth D, Neaton JD. JAMAJAMA 1986;256(10):2823-2828 1986;256(10):2823-2828.
CHD mortality rises in line with total cholesterolCHD mortality rises in line with total cholesterol
1
10
100
3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0
Total cholesterol (mmol/l)
An
nu
al a
ge-
stan
dar
dis
ed C
HD
mo
rtal
ity
(%)
Stamler J, Wentworth D, Neaton JD. Stamler J, Wentworth D, Neaton JD. JAMAJAMA 1986;256(10):2823-2828 1986;256(10):2823-2828.
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5
Total cholesterol (mmol/l)
An
nu
al C
HD
mo
rtal
ity
rate
Reducing cholesterol reduces CHD mortalityReducing cholesterol reduces CHD mortality
4S
HPSLIPID
CARE
POSCH
Helsinki
WOSCOPS LRC
AFCAPS/TexCAPS
High risk study groups
Low risk study groups
End of studyStart of study
MRC/BHF Heart Protection MRC/BHF Heart Protection StudyStudyMRC/BHF Heart Protection MRC/BHF Heart Protection StudyStudy• 20,000 subjects with Increased CHD risk due to 20,000 subjects with Increased CHD risk due to
prior disease :prior disease :
• Myocardial infarction or other CHD ;Myocardial infarction or other CHD ;• Occlusive disease of non-coronary arteries ; orOcclusive disease of non-coronary arteries ; or• Diabetes mellitus or treated hypertension.Diabetes mellitus or treated hypertension.
• Age 40-80 yearsAge 40-80 years• Total cholesterol >3.5 mmol/l ( >135mg/dl)Total cholesterol >3.5 mmol/l ( >135mg/dl)
• Randomised to simvastatin 40 mg or placeboRandomised to simvastatin 40 mg or placebo
• 20,000 subjects with Increased CHD risk due to 20,000 subjects with Increased CHD risk due to prior disease :prior disease :
• Myocardial infarction or other CHD ;Myocardial infarction or other CHD ;• Occlusive disease of non-coronary arteries ; orOcclusive disease of non-coronary arteries ; or• Diabetes mellitus or treated hypertension.Diabetes mellitus or treated hypertension.
• Age 40-80 yearsAge 40-80 years• Total cholesterol >3.5 mmol/l ( >135mg/dl)Total cholesterol >3.5 mmol/l ( >135mg/dl)
• Randomised to simvastatin 40 mg or placeboRandomised to simvastatin 40 mg or placebo
SIMVASTATIN: VASCULAR EVENT by PRIOR DISEASE
Risk ratio and 95% CISTATIN PLACEBOBaselinefeature (10269) (10267) STATIN better STATIN worse
S T A T IN w o rs e
Previous MI 1007 1255
Other CHD (not MI) 452 597
No prior CHD
CVD 182 215
PVD 332 427
Diabetes 279 369
ALL PATIENTS 2042 2606(19.9%) (25.4%)
24%SE 2.6reduction(2P<0.00001)
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
SIMVASTATIN: VASCULAR EVENT by PRIOR LIPID LEVELS
Risk ratio and 95% CISTATIN PLACEBOBaselinefeature (10269) (10267) STATIN better STATIN worse
LDL (mmol/l)
Hetc2
2 = 3.0
< 3.0 (116 mg/dl) 602 761³ 3.0 < 3.5 483 655³ 3.5 (135 mg/dl) 957 1190
Total cholesterol (mmol/l)
Hetc2
2 = 0.5
<5.0 (193 mg/dl) 361 476³ 5.0 < 6.0 746 965³ 6.0 (232 mg/dl) 935 1165
ALL PATIENTS 2042 2606(19.9%) (25.4%)
24%SE 2.6reduction(2P<0.00001)
0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
CARDSCARDSCollaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study
Helen Colhoun, John Betteridge, Paul Durrington, Graham Hitman, Andrew Neil, Shona Livingstone, Margaret Thomason, Michael Mackness, Valentine Menys, John Fuller on behalf of the CARDS Investigators
Primary prevention diabetes patients with one other risk factor (hypertension, smoker, micro-albuminuria, retinopathy)
Atorvastatin 10mg
Placebo
2838patients
CARDS Design
Placebo
Treatment effect on the primary endpointTreatment effect on the primary endpoint
21 (1.5%)
24 (1.7%)
51 (3.6%)
83 (5.8%)
Atorva*
48% (11- 69)39 (2.8%)Stroke
31% (16- 59)34 (2.4%)Coronary revascularisation
36% (9- 55)77 (5.5%)Acute coronary events
37% (17- 52)
p=0.001127 (9.0%)Primary endpoint**
Hazard Ratio Risk Reduction (CI)
Placebo*Event
.2 .4 .6 .8 1 1.2** Fatal MI, other acute CHD death, non fatal MI, unstable angina, CABG, fatal stroke, non fatal stroke
Subgroup* Placebo** Atorva**Hazard Ratio Risk Reduction
(CI)
LDL-C ≥ 3.06 66 (9.5) 44 (6.1) 38% (9-58)
LDL-C < 3.06 61 (8.5) 39 (5.6) 37% (6-58)
p=0.96
HDL-C ≥ 1.35 62 (8.4) 36 (5.2) 41% (11-61)
HDL-C < 1.35 65 (9.6) 47 (6.4) 35% (5-55)
p=0.71
Trig. ≥ 1.7 67 (9.6) 40 (5.5) 44% (18-62)
Trig. < 1.7 60 (8.4) 43 (6.1) 29% (-5-52)p=0.40
Treatment effect on the primary endpoint by lipid levelsTreatment effect on the primary endpoint by lipid levels
.2 .4 .6 .8 1 1.2
JBS 2 : indications for statin therapy in JBS 2 : indications for statin therapy in type 1 or type 2 diabetestype 1 or type 2 diabetes
• Age > 40 yearsAge > 40 years
• Retinopathy of greater than background Retinopathy of greater than background severityseverity
• Nephropathy, including microalbuminuriaNephropathy, including microalbuminuria
• Poor glycaemic control (HbAPoor glycaemic control (HbA11c > 9%)c > 9%)
• Hypertension requiring treatmentHypertension requiring treatment
• Elevated total cholesterol ( > 6.0 mmol/l)Elevated total cholesterol ( > 6.0 mmol/l)
• Metabolic syndromeMetabolic syndrome
• Family history of premature CHD in a first Family history of premature CHD in a first degree relativedegree relative
• Age > 40 yearsAge > 40 years
• Retinopathy of greater than background Retinopathy of greater than background severityseverity
• Nephropathy, including microalbuminuriaNephropathy, including microalbuminuria
• Poor glycaemic control (HbAPoor glycaemic control (HbA11c > 9%)c > 9%)
• Hypertension requiring treatmentHypertension requiring treatment
• Elevated total cholesterol ( > 6.0 mmol/l)Elevated total cholesterol ( > 6.0 mmol/l)
• Metabolic syndromeMetabolic syndrome
• Family history of premature CHD in a first Family history of premature CHD in a first degree relativedegree relative
Total cholesterol still > 4 ?Total cholesterol still > 4 ?Total cholesterol still > 4 ?Total cholesterol still > 4 ?
• Use a more potent statin ?Use a more potent statin ?
• Add cholesterol absorption Add cholesterol absorption inhibitor : ezetimibe ?inhibitor : ezetimibe ?
• Role of fibrate or nicotinic acid ?Role of fibrate or nicotinic acid ?
• Use a more potent statin ?Use a more potent statin ?
• Add cholesterol absorption Add cholesterol absorption inhibitor : ezetimibe ?inhibitor : ezetimibe ?
• Role of fibrate or nicotinic acid ?Role of fibrate or nicotinic acid ?
Cost EffectivenessCost Effectiveness
InterventionIntervention
Substitute Substitute rosuvastatinrosuvastatin Add ezetimibeAdd ezetimibe
CostCost10 mg £18.0310 mg £18.03
20 mg £26.0220 mg £26.02£1.31 + £26.31 £1.31 + £26.31 = £27.62= £27.62
Expected TC Expected TC reductionreduction 10%10% 25%25%
British National Formulary 2008
Patients not on target on simvastatin 40 mgPatients not on target on simvastatin 40 mg
Total Total cholesterolcholesterol
TargetTarget
<< 5.0 5.0 < 4.0< 4.0
ActionAction
> 5.5> 5.5 Add ezetimibeAdd ezetimibe
Add ezetimibeAdd ezetimibe5.5 – 5.05.5 – 5.0 RosuvastatinRosuvastatin
5.0 – 4.55.0 – 4.5
On targetOn target4.5 – 4.04.5 – 4.0 RosuvastatinRosuvastatin
<< 4.0 4.0 On targetOn target
Fibrates : FIELD StudyFibrates : FIELD Study
• 9795 subjects with T2D : 7664 no CVD9795 subjects with T2D : 7664 no CVD
• Fenofibrate 200 mg versus placeboFenofibrate 200 mg versus placebo
• Average 5 year follow upAverage 5 year follow up
• 36% of placebo group and 19% of fenofibrate 36% of placebo group and 19% of fenofibrate group given statinsgroup given statins
• Fenofibrate : TC Fenofibrate : TC 11%, LDL 11%, LDL 12%, HDL 12%, HDL 5% , 5% , TG TG 29% 29%
• Primary endpoint Primary endpoint 11% (NS) 11% (NS)
• Reduction in laser therapy / progression of Reduction in laser therapy / progression of albuminuria in fenofibrate groupalbuminuria in fenofibrate group
• Myositis / rhabdomyolysis < 1%Myositis / rhabdomyolysis < 1%
• 9795 subjects with T2D : 7664 no CVD9795 subjects with T2D : 7664 no CVD
• Fenofibrate 200 mg versus placeboFenofibrate 200 mg versus placebo
• Average 5 year follow upAverage 5 year follow up
• 36% of placebo group and 19% of fenofibrate 36% of placebo group and 19% of fenofibrate group given statinsgroup given statins
• Fenofibrate : TC Fenofibrate : TC 11%, LDL 11%, LDL 12%, HDL 12%, HDL 5% , 5% , TG TG 29% 29%
• Primary endpoint Primary endpoint 11% (NS) 11% (NS)
• Reduction in laser therapy / progression of Reduction in laser therapy / progression of albuminuria in fenofibrate groupalbuminuria in fenofibrate group
• Myositis / rhabdomyolysis < 1%Myositis / rhabdomyolysis < 1%
FIELD Study Investigators, Lancet 2005; 366; 1849-1861
The Alphabet StrategyThe Alphabet StrategyThe Alphabet StrategyThe Alphabet Strategy
• AAdvicedvice Smoking , diet , exerciseSmoking , diet , exercise
• BBlood pressure lood pressure << 140/80 140/80
• CCholesterol holesterol TC TC << 4.0 mmol/l , LDL ≤ 2.0 mmol/l 4.0 mmol/l , LDL ≤ 2.0 mmol/lHDL > 1.0 mmol/l, TGs HDL > 1.0 mmol/l, TGs << 1.7 mmol/l 1.7 mmol/l
• DDiabetes control iabetes control HbA1c ≤ 7%HbA1c ≤ 7%
• EEye examination ye examination Annual examinationAnnual examination
• FFeet examination eet examination Annual examinationAnnual examination
• GGuardian drugs uardian drugs Aspirin, ACEI, ARB, statinsAspirin, ACEI, ARB, statins
• AAdvicedvice Smoking , diet , exerciseSmoking , diet , exercise
• BBlood pressure lood pressure << 140/80 140/80
• CCholesterol holesterol TC TC << 4.0 mmol/l , LDL ≤ 2.0 mmol/l 4.0 mmol/l , LDL ≤ 2.0 mmol/lHDL > 1.0 mmol/l, TGs HDL > 1.0 mmol/l, TGs << 1.7 mmol/l 1.7 mmol/l
• DDiabetes control iabetes control HbA1c ≤ 7%HbA1c ≤ 7%
• EEye examination ye examination Annual examinationAnnual examination
• FFeet examination eet examination Annual examinationAnnual examination
• GGuardian drugs uardian drugs Aspirin, ACEI, ARB, statinsAspirin, ACEI, ARB, statins