24
JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland

Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Chemical selectivity of the

IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system

Heikki Penttilä

The IGISOL group

University of Jyvaskyla, Finland

Page 2: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Fission ion guide technique

19.5.2016

Target

SPIG

electrode

Beam

Extractor

Based on survival of primary ions from nuclear reaction in helium buffer gas

Fast extraction of ions is required to prevent neutralisation

Charge state concentration: (0), +1, (+2)

Produces ions of any element

All elements can be studied

All ions come directly from fission Ion rate in the formed beam corresponds

to the independent fission yield

Page 3: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Mass dependency of the stopped ions

19.5.2016

http://arxiv.org/abs/1409.0714

Simulations made by

Uppsala Universitet

collaboration

Page 4: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Counting ions with JYFLTRAP

19.5.2016

Page 5: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Counting ions with JYFLTRAP

19.5.2016

SPLAT

1.5

Page 6: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Charge distributions

19.5.2016

1000

800

600

400

200

0

1280700128060012805001280400

Reference file: 2014-05-29 19:25:28C:MyTemp:data:A84_A85:m84_1:bunches.dat

84As 1280393, 1280391.8 Area = 696.000

84Se 1280558, 1280556.7 Area = 4093.000

84Br 1280588, 1280584.8 Area = 700.000

84Kr 1280664, 1280662.8 Area = 4693.000

Page 7: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

6000

5000

4000

3000

2000

1000

0

As Se Br SrKr

a =315.66 ± 18x0 =29.987 ± 0.0301w =0.6638 ± 0.0216

A = 84Stable isotopeImpurity in helium57 % natural abundance

a =5632.6 ± 0.00863 x0 =33.925 ± 52.2 w =0.79643 ± 68.7

Charge distributions

19.5.2016

1000

800

600

400

200

0

1280700128060012805001280400

Reference file: 2014-05-29 19:25:28C:MyTemp:data:A84_A85:m84_1:bunches.dat

84As 1280393, 1280391.8 Area = 696.000

84Se 1280558, 1280556.7 Area = 4093.000

84Br 1280588, 1280584.8 Area = 700.000

84Kr 1280664, 1280662.8 Area = 4693.000

Page 8: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Charge distributions

19.5.2016

Page 9: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Yu. Kudryavtsev, et al

NIMB 266, 4368–4372 (2008)

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nimb.2008.05.037

(Ar ionisation potential ~16 eV)

Efficiency from a known yield distribution

Yield distribution

from 252Cf source

Page 10: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Way around the chemical dependencies

19.5.2016

Element-dependent (chemical) effects

in transmission same for all isotopes

of the same element

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

120 118 116 114 112 110 108

Fit results for Pd c

2 = 0.36343

<A> = 114.8 ± 0.072003 W = 2.8086 ± 0.058443 Y = 100 ± 0.38865

Page 11: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

From isotopic yields …

19.5.2016

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

9290888684

Fit results for Br

c2 = 0.13871

<A> = 86.829 ± 0.06904 W = 2.7066 ± 0.11047 Y = 100 ± 4.6643

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

989694929088

Fit results for Rb

c2 = 3.7498

<A> = 92.114 ± 0.046949 W = 2.6151 ± 0.056959 Y = 100 ± 4.6665

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

1021009896949290

Fit results for Y

c2 = 1.5109

<A> = 96.841 ± 0.082338 W = 2.778 ± 0.085224 Y = 100 ± 2.3414

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

114112110108106104

Fit results for Ru

c2 = 1.5816

<A> = 109.59 ± 0.050538 W = 2.5371 ± 0.050741 Y = 100 ± 0.95159

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

120118116114112110108

Fit results for Pd

c2 = 0.36343

<A> = 114.8 ± 0.072003 W = 2.8086 ± 0.058443 Y = 100 ± 0.38865

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

128126124122120118116

Fit results for In

c2 = 0.30896

<A> = 123.49 ± 0.077068 W = 2.6972 ± 0.063651 Y = 100 ± 1.3324

Page 12: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

…to absolute yields?

19.5.2016

60

55

50

45

40

35

30

100908070605040

25 MeV p + 238U

Page 13: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Mass yields

19.5.2016

Eur. Phys. J. A (2016) 52: 104

http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16104-4

Page 14: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Independent absolute yields

19.5.2016

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

9290888684

Fit results for Br

c2 = 0.13871

<A> = 86.829 ± 0.06904 W = 2.7066 ± 0.11047 Y = 100 ± 4.6643

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

989694929088

Fit results for Rb

c2 = 3.7498

<A> = 92.114 ± 0.046949 W = 2.6151 ± 0.056959 Y = 100 ± 4.6665

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

1021009896949290

Fit results for Y

c2 = 1.5109

<A> = 96.841 ± 0.082338 W = 2.778 ± 0.085224 Y = 100 ± 2.3414

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

114112110108106104

Fit results for Ru

c2 = 1.5816

<A> = 109.59 ± 0.050538 W = 2.5371 ± 0.050741 Y = 100 ± 0.95159

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

120118116114112110108

Fit results for Pd

c2 = 0.36343

<A> = 114.8 ± 0.072003 W = 2.8086 ± 0.058443 Y = 100 ± 0.38865

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

128126124122120118116

Fit results for In

c2 = 0.30896

<A> = 123.49 ± 0.077068 W = 2.6972 ± 0.063651 Y = 100 ± 1.3324

Page 15: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Independent absolute yields

19.5.2016

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

9290888684

Fit results for Br

c2 = 0.13871

<A> = 86.829 ± 0.06904 W = 2.7066 ± 0.11047 Y = 100 ± 4.6643

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

989694929088

Fit results for Rb

c2 = 3.7498

<A> = 92.114 ± 0.046949 W = 2.6151 ± 0.056959 Y = 100 ± 4.6665

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

1021009896949290

Fit results for Y

c2 = 1.5109

<A> = 96.841 ± 0.082338 W = 2.778 ± 0.085224 Y = 100 ± 2.3414

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

114112110108106104

Fit results for Ru

c2 = 1.5816

<A> = 109.59 ± 0.050538 W = 2.5371 ± 0.050741 Y = 100 ± 0.95159

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

120118116114112110108

Fit results for Pd

c2 = 0.36343

<A> = 114.8 ± 0.072003 W = 2.8086 ± 0.058443 Y = 100 ± 0.38865

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

128126124122120118116

Fit results for In

c2 = 0.30896

<A> = 123.49 ± 0.077068 W = 2.6972 ± 0.063651 Y = 100 ± 1.3324

60

55

50

45

40

35

30

100908070605040

Page 16: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

”Absolute” and experimental yield ratios

19.5.2016

108Tc

108Ru

Page 17: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

”Absolute” and experimental yield ratios

19.5.2016

130Sb 130Te

130Sn

Page 18: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Efficiency ratios between elements

19.5.2016

Page 19: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Efficiency ratios between elements

19.5.2016

Page 20: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

Charge distribution modification

19.5.2016

1000

800

600

400

200

0

1280700128060012805001280400

Reference file: 2014-05-29 19:25:28C:MyTemp:data:A84_A85:m84_1:bunches.dat

84As 1280393, 1280391.8 Area = 696.000

84Se 1280558, 1280556.7 Area = 4093.000

84Br 1280588, 1280584.8 Area = 700.000

84Kr 1280664, 1280662.8 Area = 4693.000

Page 21: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

19.5.2016

Relative efficiency fluctuation

Page 22: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

19.5.2016

IGISOL group and

relevant collaboration:

JYFL-IGISOL: H. Penttilä, A. Jokinen, I.D.Moore, J. Äystö, V.A. Rubchenya, S. Rinta-Antila, V.S. Kolhinen, T. Eronen, A. Kankainen, A. Voss, D. Gorelov, J. Hakala, V. Simutkin, V. Sonnenschein, I. Pohjalainen, J. Koponen, J. Reinikainen

This work has been supported by Academy of Finland via several projects and the Centre of Excellence program, as well as by EU via ERINDA (2010-2013) and CHANDA (2013-2017) projects.

Page 23: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

25 MeV p + natU fission : centroids

AUNC = Z × 𝐴(𝑝+𝑈)

𝑍(𝑝+𝑈)

H. Penttila et al, Eur. Phys. J. A (2016) 52: 104

http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epja/i2016-16104-4

Page 24: Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system · Chemical selectivity of the IGISOL/JYFLTRAP system Heikki Penttilä The IGISOL group University of Jyvaskyla, Finland . JYVÄSKYLÄN

JYVÄSKYLÄN YLIOPISTO

60

55

50

45

40

35

30

100908070605040

Independent absolute yields

19.5.2016

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

9290888684

Fit results for Br

c2 = 0.13871

<A> = 86.829 ± 0.06904 W = 2.7066 ± 0.11047 Y = 100 ± 4.6643

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

989694929088

Fit results for Rb

c2 = 3.7498

<A> = 92.114 ± 0.046949 W = 2.6151 ± 0.056959 Y = 100 ± 4.6665

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

1021009896949290

Fit results for Y

c2 = 1.5109

<A> = 96.841 ± 0.082338 W = 2.778 ± 0.085224 Y = 100 ± 2.3414

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

114112110108106104

Fit results for Ru

c2 = 1.5816

<A> = 109.59 ± 0.050538 W = 2.5371 ± 0.050741 Y = 100 ± 0.95159

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

120118116114112110108

Fit results for Pd

c2 = 0.36343

<A> = 114.8 ± 0.072003 W = 2.8086 ± 0.058443 Y = 100 ± 0.38865

140

120

100

80

60

40

20

0

128126124122120118116

Fit results for In

c2 = 0.30896

<A> = 123.49 ± 0.077068 W = 2.6972 ± 0.063651 Y = 100 ± 1.3324