32
Charles L. McClenahan 10 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606 RCM-2 Risk and Return Analysis in Ratemaking CAS Seminar on Ratemaking - March, 2005 ACTUARIAL C O N S U LT IN G

Charles L. McClenahan 10 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606 RCM-2 Risk and Return Analysis in Ratemaking CAS Seminar on Ratemaking - March, 2005

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Charles L. McClenahan10 South Wacker Drive, Chicago, IL 60606

RCM-2Risk and Return Analysis in Ratemaking

CAS Seminar on Ratemaking - March, 2005

A C T U A R I A L C O N S U L T I N G

2

Who is this guy, and why do I care what he says?

Curmudgeon

Fuddy-Duddy

“Refuses to change with the times”

3

Who is this guy, and why do I care what he says?

Other Famous Curmudgeons

Churchill

Marx

FieldsParker

Mencken

Lebowitz

4

Who is this guy, and why do I care what he says?

Other Famous Curmudgeons

Dorothy Parker

"This is not a novel to be tossed aside

lightly. It should be thrown aside

with great force."

5

Who is this guy, and why do I care what he says?

Other Famous Curmudgeons

Winston Churchill

Lady Astor: "Winston, if I were your wife

I'd put poison in your coffee.”

Winston: "Nancy, if I were your husband

I'd drink it."

6

Who is this guy, and why do I care what he says?

Other Famous Curmudgeons

W. C. Fields

“A thing worth having is a thing worth cheating for.”

7

Who is this guy, and why do I care what he says?

Other Famous Curmudgeons

Groucho Marx

“Those are my principles. If you don't

like them I have others.”

8

Who is this guy, and why do I care what he says?

Fran Lebowitz

Other Famous Curmudgeons

“I've done the calculation and your

chances of winning the lottery are

identical whether you play or not.”

9

Who is this guy, and why do I care what he says?

Other Famous Curmudgeons

Mencken

“For every complex problem, there is

a solution that is simple, neat,

and wrong.”

10

Proper Recognition of Capital – Allocation and Costs

Largely misguided and irrelevant

11

Proper Recognition of Capital – Allocation and Costs

Largely misguided and irrelevant

Making something more technically challenging does not improve its quality

12

Proper Recognition of Capital – Allocation and Costs

“Statistics are like bikinis: what they reveal is suggestive but what they conceal is vital.” Aaron Levenstein

“As far as the laws of mathematics refer to reality, they are not certain; and as far as they are certain, they do not refer to reality.” Albert Einstein

“We used to think that if we knew one, we knew two, because one and one are two. We are finding that we must learn a great deal more about ‘and’.” Sir Arthur Eddington

13

CAS Statement of Principles

“The underwriting profit and contingency provisions are the amounts that, when considered with net investment and other income, provide an appropriate total after-tax return.”

What is Our Goal?

14

What’s appropriate?

– CAS Statement of Principles

- Risk charge for “random variation from the expected costs” must be “consistent with the cost of capital”

- Included in underwriting profit provision

– “Charge for any systematic variation of estimated costs from the expected costs … should be reflected in the … contingency provision.”

What is Our Goal?

15

– No such thing as Iowa homeowners surplus

- Entire surplus stands behind every risk

Allocation of equity

16

– No such thing as Iowa homeowners surplus

- Entire surplus stands behind every risk

– Allocation ignores value of unallocated surplus

- Treats $100 million equity company with 1% Iowa homeowners same as $1 million equity Iowa homeowners specialist

Allocation of equity

ALLOCATED SURPLUS

TOTAL

17

– No such thing as Iowa homeowners surplus

- Entire surplus stands behind every risk

– Allocation ignores value of unallocated surplus

- Treats $100 million equity company with 1% Iowa homeowners same as $1 million equity Iowa homeowners specialist

– Problems with allocation basis

- Assignment of investment portfolio

- Tracking incremental gains/losses in equity by line

- Problem in case of allocated surplus exhaustion

Allocation of equity

18

“Benchmark” or “Normative” Ratios

Remember H. L. Mencken?

“For every complex problem, there is

a solution that is simple, neat,

and wrong.”

19

– Regulators assume or mandate assumed leverage (writings-to-surplus) ratio by line of business

– Example

- Assume return on equity is 12.5%

“Benchmark” or “Normative” Ratios

20

“Benchmark” or “Normative” Ratios

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

Writings-to-Surplus Ratio

Return on Equity

Return on Sales

21

What happens if we use a “benchmark” risk ratio of 3:1 to allocate surplus to this line

“Benchmark” or “Normative” Ratios

22

“Benchmark” or “Normative” Ratios

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

Writings-to-Surplus Ratio

Return on Equity Target

Return on Sales Target

True Return on Equity

True Return on Sales

23

Let’s eliminate the target returns and focus on what really happens

“Benchmark” or “Normative” Ratios

24

“Benchmark” or “Normative” Ratios

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

Writings-to-Surplus Ratio

True Return on Equity

True Return on Sales

25

“Benchmark” or “Normative” Ratios

Result is a constant 4.17% return on sales– Eliminates problems with allocation– Does not regulate return on equity– Does not reflect cost of capital

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0

Writings-to-Surplus Ratio

True Return on Equity

True Return on Sales

26

So how should we do it?

The true issue is: How much insurance will I be willing to sell at the price I can get?

27

So how should we do it?

The true issue is: How much insurance will I be willing to sell at the price I can get?

Few companies have sufficient market share to determine the market price

28

So how should we do it?

The true issue is: How much insurance will I be willing to sell at the price I can get?

Few companies have sufficient market share to determine the market price

We’re not all that good on the major stuff

29

So how should we do it?

We’re not all that good on the major stuff

Industry Annual Change in L&LAE Ratio

-10%

-8%

-6%

-4%

-2%

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003

Calendar Year - Source: Best's Aggregates and Averages

30

So how should we do it?

The true issue is: How much insurance will I be willing to sell at the price I can get?

Few companies have sufficient market share to determine the market price

We’re not all that good on the major stuff

So we should –– Establish long-term return goals on assets, equity, sales, whatever– Annually assess whether they can be met– Act accordingly

31

A Few Good GrumpsAARP Magazine By Jon Winokur, November-December 2003

“The world needs curmudgeons. They refuse to see life through the filter of wishful thinking and are outspoken in their devotion to the harsh realities of life. They protect the rest of us, stumbling about blindly behind our rose-colored glasses, from ourselves.”

32

What others [might have] said on the issue

Either this [idea] is dead or my watch has stopped. – Groucho Marx

For centuries, [actuaries] have been explaining the unknowable in terms of the-not-worth-knowing.

– H. L. Mencken

The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those who have not got it.

– George Bernard Shaw

I have never let my schooling interfere with my education. – Mark Twain

Whenever people agree with me I always feel I must be wrong. – Oscar Wilde