31
Jennifer H. Richards 1 Tom Philippi 1 P. Kalla 2 and D. Scheidt 3 1 Dept. of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 2 U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Science and Ecosystem Support Division, Athens, GA 3 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Water Management Division, Athens, GA Characterization of Southern Florida Marsh Vegetation Using a Landscape Scale Random Sample: R-EMAP Phase III Vegetation Sampling.

Characterization of Southern Florida Marsh Vegetation

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Jennifer H. Richards1

Tom Philippi1P. Kalla2 and D. Scheidt3

1Dept. of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 2U.S Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Science and Ecosystem Support

Division, Athens, GA 3U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Water Management Division,

Athens, GA

Characterization of Southern Florida Marsh Vegetation Using a Landscape

Scale Random Sample: R-EMAP Phase III Vegetation Sampling.

• Sampled 111 sites in spring 2005, 119 sites in fall 2005, 230 total

• Parameters sampled at each site, where possible:– Biogeochemical (soil,

surface and pore-water nutrients/mercury/physical parameters)

– Plant species presence and vegetation mapping

– Fish (fall only)– Invertebrates (fall only)– Periphyton (fall only)

R-EMAP Sampling Design

Plant Species Sampling• Plant Community

Analysis• Exotic Plant Species

Surveys– Survey on fly-in– Survey from

helicopter pontoons

Plant Community Analysis:

• Species presence in 20 (¼ m2) quadratsdistributed along 10 m N-S transect 5 m west of sampling point

• Additional transect to reflect additional diversity within 50m radius at site

• Sawgrass density counted and l x w of longest leaf measured in 3rd m2

Transect 1 Transect 2

20 (0.25) m2 quadrats

Sawgrass density

S N

• 230 sites visited (111 spring, 119 fall)– 114 sites had transect 2

• 187 species encountered (including 4 unknowns)– 173 on transect 1– 106 on transect 2– 14 species present on transect 2 but not on

transect 1

Plant Community Analysis

Species Occurrence, Transect 1

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

0.60

0.70

0.80

0.90

1 8 15 22 29 36 43 50 57 64 71 78 85 92 99 106 113 120 127 134 141 148 155 162 169

Species

Freq

uenc

y

These 133 species (77%) occurred at10 or fewer sites

Sawgrss (Cladium jamaicense)

Two species of Utricularia

173 taxa distributed among 230 sites (111 spring, 119 fall)

Agglomerative hierarchical clustering of primary transect data:5 groups recognized

Info

rmat

ion

Rem

aini

ng (%

)10

075

5025

0

s128

s4 s143

s16

s138

s257

s150

s20

s130

s132

s142

s153

s131

s258

s136

s137

s140

s154

s11

s10

s108

s2 s13

s15

s3 s36

s41

s5 s135

s180

s165

s160

s253

s174

s105

s217

s229

s87

s93

s181

s182

s81

s56

s187

s185

s157

s100

s7 s70

s162

s166

s171

s367

s25

s104

s112

s163

s47

s107

s59

s189

s206

s216

s51

s195

s227

s254

s183

s240

s75

s252

s37

s177

s43

s219

s228

s106

s224

s95

s102

s67

s94

s226

s66

s230

s1 s239

s244

s176

s234

s90

s186

s191

s200

s197

s208

s223

s233

s110

s89

s145

s123

s202

s65

s204

s85

s48

s18

s249

s119

s364

s147

s178

s148

s152

s192

s118

s199

s194

s251

s193

s211

s215

s221

s238

s73

s80

s83

s68

s77

s156

s97

s218

s231

s82

s99

s179

s86

s84

s210

s220

s235

s109

s121

s236

s488

s115

s203

s12

s141

s124

s214

s370

s169

s207

s64

s14

s101

s151

s31

s222

s91

s155

s35

s351

s19

s170

s161

s21

s144

s23

s158

s32

s167

s17

s26

s27

s149

s39

s24

s29

s38

s120

s122

s146

s159

s213

s255

s198

s88

s30

s33

s40

s172

s28

s55

s49

s69

s76

s53

s57

s173

s188

s54

s368

s175

s237

s184

s242

s245

s374

s117

s114

s190

s96

s350

s225

s205

s212

s61

s72

s74

s365

s45

s63

s46

s52

s62

s58

s366

Muhlenbergia Cladium Typha Eleocharis Nymphaea(muhly) (sawgrass) (cattail) (spikerush) (water lily)

Species IV % pMuhly group

Muhlenbergia capillaris 89.1 89 0.0002Panicum tenerum 59.1 75 0.0002Centella asiatica 52.4 54 0.0002Symphyotrichum bracei 48.5 50 0.0002Pluchea rosea 44.6 54 0.0002Rhynchospora microcarpa 36.7 57 0.0002Solidago stricta 35.7 36 0.0002Cassytha filiformis 35.6 36 0.0002Schizachyrium rhizomatum 35.3 36 0.0002Polygala grandiflora 32.1 32 0.0002

Muhly group is most species rich:

28 sites, 47 species, 41 significant indicator species;But note, also, sawgrass is present at 100% of these sites

Sawgrass group is most common but is species poor:

102 sites, 7 species, 2 significant indicator species;

Species IV % pSawgrass group

Cladium jamaicense 34.8 100 0.0002Cephalanthus occidentalis 13.3 19 0.0206

Species IV % pSpikerush group

Eleocharis cellulosa 68.8 92 0.0002Bacopa caroliniana 60.9 75 0.0002Rhynchospora tracyi 35.8 44 0.0002Panicum hemitomon 34.3 60 0.0002Sagittaria lancifolia 20.4 48 0.0094Paspalidium geminatum 15.0 37 0.0194Rhynchospora inundata 10.8 13 0.024Justicia angusta 13.5 27 0.0344

Spikerush group is next most abundant and diverse:

52 sites, 18 species, 8 significant indicator species;

Species IV % pWater lily group

Nymphaea odorata 74.0 100 0.0002Utricularia purpurea 55.0 90 0.0002Utricularia gibba 43.7 79 0.0002Eleocharis elongata 35.6 41 0.0002Nymphoides aquatica 25.4 34 0.0002Utricularia foliosa 31.3 72 0.0004

Water lily group has floating-leaved and submerged or free-floating aquatics

29 sites, 10 species, 6 significant indicator species, including 3 rootless, aquatic bladderwort species

Species IV % pCattail group

Typha domingensis 88.8 95 0.0002Polygonum hydropiperoides 43.3 47 0.0002Salix caroliniana 25.1 26 0.0002Sarcostemma clausum 12.6 16 0.0056Salvinia minima 9.0 11 0.0172Pontederia cordata 16.1 26 0.02

Cattail group is least abundant

19 sites, 10 species, 6 significant indicator species, including exotics, shrubs and vines

Muhly groupSawgrass groupCattail groupSpikerush groupWater Lily group

NMS Ordination of Sites:

3Dimensions with 80% of information; groups separate but with overlap

• Muhly group is very distinct;

• Cattail group is dispersed;

• Sawgrass, spikerush and water lily groups overlap but occupy different sectors of ordination space.

Muhly groupSawgrass groupCattail groupSpikerush groupWater Lily group

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 2

Axi

s 3

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 2

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 3

Species distributions among clusters reflectboth overlap and distinctions among groups

Cladium

Muhlenbergia

Nymphaea

Eleocharis

Muhly groupSawgrass groupCattail groupSpikerush groupWater Lily group

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 3

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 3

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 3

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 3

Muhly groupSawgrass groupCattail groupSpikerush groupWater Lily group

• Soil Variables• Thickness• pH• Bulk Density*• Ash Free Dry Weight*• Total P• Total N*• Total C*

• Hydrology Variables• Wet Season Water Depth*• Dry Season Water Depth*• Average Hydroperiod• No. Week-long Drydowns

Four environmental variables, r2 > 0.20, correlate most strongly to a single axis

TN

BD

DSDWSD

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 3

(Scheidt andKalla 2007)

(Scheidt &Kalla 2007)

Muhly groupSawgrass groupCattail groupSpikerush groupWater Lily group

• Soil Variables• Thickness• pH• Bulk Density• Ash Free Dry Weight• Total P*• Total N• Total C

• Hydrology Variables• Wet Season Water Depth• Dry Season Water Depth• Average Hydroperiod• No. Week-long Drydowns

But Total P in soil correlates to another axis, r2 = 0.309

TP

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 2

Combined correlations for the environmental variables are seen in the third dimension

TP

TN

BD

DSDWSD

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 2

Axi

s 3

Muhly groupSawgrass groupCattail groupSpikerush groupWater Lily group

• Soil Variables• Thickness• pH• Bulk Density*• Ash Free Dry Weight• Total P*• Total N*• Total C*

• Hydrology Variables• Wet Season Water Depth*• Dry Season Water Depth*• Average Hydroperiod• No. Week-long Drydowns

Removing outliers removes TP as a significant correlate, reduces axes to 2D, changes species composition of the cattail group and classifies

more sites in the water lily group

TC

TN

BD

AFDW

DSDWSD

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 2

Muhly groupSawgrass groupCattail groupSpikerush groupWater Lily group

• Soil Variables• Thickness• pH• Bulk Density*• Ash Free Dry Weight*• Total P• Total N*• Total C*

• Hydrology Variables• Wet Season Water Depth*• Dry Season Water Depth*• Average Hydroperiod• Maximum Hyrdroperiod• No. Week-long Drydowns

Species Distributions Across the Landscape

The Everglades is the River of (Saw)Grass

Sawgrass Leaf Length vs. Density by Region

Culms per m2

Leng

th o

f Lon

gest

Lea

f (cm

)

R2y = 0.6973x + 107.15= 0.0359

R2y = 0.0929x + 186.78= 0.0013

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80

Sawgrass, ENPSawgrass, north

Sawgrass morphology and culm density have unimodal (not bimodal) distributions;

morphology but not density varies across the landscape

Sawgrass Leaf Length by Region

Leng

th o

f Lon

gest

Lea

f (cm

)

300

250

200

150

100

50

0

ENP WCA2, 3LOX

a bb

Other common species are unevenly distributed

White water lily is sparse in ENP1999 2005

Conclusions• Everglades marsh plant associations can be broadly

delimited into 5 communities that separate out along a hydrologic gradient

• The muhly and water lily groups are distinct and form the end-points of this environmental gradient; muhly and water lily make good indicator species for these groups.

• The other species associations show lots of overlap and grade into each other along the hydrologic gradient

TN

BD

DSDWSD

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 1

Axi

s 3

Conclusions• A cattail association varies along a

separate environmental gradient that correlates with soil TP; this association has sites that are both natural and nutrient impacted.

• Sawgrass shows broad tolerances of hydrological and biogeochemical conditions and is present and abundant throughout the entire Everglades, whereas other species have more restricted distributions.

• Both water lily distribution and sawgrass morphology reflect on a landscape scale the drier, shallower environment in ENP as compared to the WCAs; these conditions should change with restoration.

TP

TN

BD

DSDWSD

0

0

40 80

40

80

Axis 2

Axi

s 3

Acknowledgements• Paul Groff, Diana Van Dillewijn, Ana

Castellanos, Walter Zagarra, Marlene Dow• Morris Flexner, Chris Decker, and the rest

of the EPA plant sampling team• The Institute for Regional Conservation