ISSUES TO ADDRESS...• How do flaws in a material initiate failure?• How is fracture resistance quantified; how do different material classes compare?• How do we estimate the stress to fracture?

1

• How do loading rate, loading history, and temperature affect the failure stress?

Ship-cyclic loadingfrom waves.

Computer chip-cyclicthermal loading.

Hip implant-cyclicloading from walking.

CHAPTER 9:MECHANICAL FAILURE

3

• Ductile failure: --one piece --large deformation

• Brittle failure: --many pieces --small deformation

EX: FAILURE OF A PIPE

4

• Evolution to failure:necking void

nucleationvoid growth and linkage

shearing at surface fracture

• Resulting fracture surfaces (steel)

50 m

particlesserve as voidnucleationsites.

50 m

100 m

MODERATELY DUCTILE FAILURE

5

• Intergranular(between grains)

• Intragranular (within grains)

Al Oxide(ceramic)

316 S. Steel (metal)

304 S. Steel (metal)

Polypropylene(polymer)

3m

4 mm 160m

1 mm

BRITTLE FRACTURE SURFACES

6

• Stress-strain behavior (Room T):

E/10

E/1000.1

perfect mat’l-no flawscarefully produced glass fiber

typical ceramic typical strengthened metaltypical polymer

TS << TSengineeringmaterials

perfectmaterials

• DaVinci (500 yrs ago!) observed... --the longer the wire, the smaller the load to fail it.• Reasons: --flaws cause premature failure. --Larger samples are more flawed!

IDEAL VS REAL MATERIALS

7

• Elliptical hole in a plate:

• Stress distrib. in front of a hole:

• Stress conc. factor:

BAD! Kt>>3NOT SO BAD

Kt=3

max

t

2oa 1

t

o

2a

Kt max /o

• Large Kt promotes failure:

FLAWS ARE STRESS CONCENTRATORS!

8

• Avoid sharp corners!

r/hsharper fillet radius

increasing w/h

0 0.5 1.01.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

Stress Conc. Factor, Ktmaxo

=

ENGINEERING FRACTURE DESIGN

r , fillet

radius

w

h

o

max

• t at a cracktip is verysmall!

9

• Result: crack tip stress is very large.

• Crack propagates when: the tip stress is large enough to make: distance, x,

from crack tip

tip K2xtip

increasing K

K ≥ Kc

WHEN DOES A CRACK PROPAGATE?

10

• Condition for crack propagation:

• Values of K for some standard loads & geometries:

2a2a

aa

K a K 1.1 a

K ≥ KcStress Intensity Factor:--Depends on load & geometry.

Fracture Toughness:--Depends on the material, temperature, environment, & rate of loading.

unitsof K :MPa mor ksi in

GEOMETRY, LOAD, & MATERIAL

11

Graphite/ Ceramics/ Semicond

Metals/ Alloys

Composites/ fibersPolymers

5

K Ic(M

Pa ·

m0.5)

1

Mg alloysAl alloys

Ti alloysSteels

Si crystalGlass -sodaConcrete

Si carbide

PC

Glass 6

0.50.7

2

43

10

20

30

<100><111>

Diamond

PVCPP

Polyester

PS

PET

C-C(|| fibers)1

0.6

67

40506070

100

Al oxideSi nitride

C/C( fibers)1

Al/Al oxide(sf)2

Al oxid/SiC(w)3

Al oxid/ZrO2(p)4Si nitr/SiC(w)5

Glass/SiC(w)6

Y2O3/ZrO2(p)4

Kcmetals

Kccomp

KccerKc

poly

incr

easin

g

Based on data in Table B5,Callister 6e.Composite reinforcement geometry is: f = fibers; sf = short fibers; w = whiskers; p = particles. Addition data as noted (vol. fraction of reinforcement):1. (55vol%) ASM Handbook, Vol. 21, ASM Int., Materials Park, OH (2001) p. 606.2. (55 vol%) Courtesy J. Cornie, MMC, Inc., Waltham, MA.3. (30 vol%) P.F. Becher et al., Fracture Mechanics of Ceramics, Vol. 7, Plenum Press (1986). pp. 61-73.4. Courtesy CoorsTek, Golden, CO.5. (30 vol%) S.T. Buljan et al., "Development of Ceramic Matrix Composites for Application in Technology for Advanced Engines Program", ORNL/Sub/85-22011/2, ORNL, 1992.6. (20vol%) F.D. Gace et al., Ceram. Eng. Sci. Proc., Vol. 7 (1986) pp. 978-82.

FRACTURE TOUGHNESS

12

• Crack growth condition:

Y a• Largest, most stressed cracks grow first!

--Result 1: Max flaw size dictates design stress.

--Result 2: Design stress dictates max. flaw size.

design

KcY amax

amax 1

KcYdesign

2

K ≥ Kc

amax

no fracture

fracture

amax

no fracture

fracture

DESIGN AGAINST CRACK GROWTH

13

• Two designs to consider...Design A --largest flaw is 9 mm --failure stress = 112 MPa

Design B --use same material --largest flaw is 4 mm --failure stress = ?

• Use... c

KcY amax

• Key point: Y and Kc are the same in both designs. --Result:

c amax A c amax B9 mm112 MPa 4 mm

Answer: c B 168MPa• Reducing flaw size pays off!

• Material has Kc = 26 MPa-m0.5

DESIGN EX: AIRCRAFT WING

14

• Increased loading rate... --increases y and TS --decreases %EL• Why? An increased rate gives less time for disl. to move past obstacles.

initial heightfinal height

sample

y

y

TS

TSlarger

smaller

(Charpy)• Impact loading: --severe testing case --more brittle --smaller toughness

LOADING RATE

15

• Increasing temperature... --increases %EL and Kc• Ductile-to-brittle transition temperature (DBTT)...

BCC metals (e.g., iron at T < 914C)

Impa

ct E

nerg

y

Temperature

FCC metals (e.g., Cu, Ni)

High strength materials (y>E/150)

polymers More Ductile Brittle

Ductile-to-brittle transition temperature

TEMPERATURE

16

• Pre-WWII: The Titanic • WWII: Liberty ships

• Problem: Used a type of steel with a DBTT ~ Room temp.

DESIGN STRATEGY:STAY ABOVE THE DBTT!

26

• Engineering materials don't reach theoretical strength.• Flaws produce stress concentrations that cause premature failure.

• Sharp corners produce large stress concentrations and premature failure.• Failure type depends on T and stress:

-for noncyclic and T < 0.4Tm, failure stress decreases with: increased maximum flaw size, decreased T, increased rate of loading.-for cyclic : cycles to fail decreases as increases.-for higher T (T > 0.4Tm): time to fail decreases as or T increases.

SUMMARY