Upload
nguyendieu
View
225
Download
4
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
157
CHAPTER 5
COMMUNITY HOUSING SCHEMES AND PEOPLE’S
PLAN IN IN KERALA
5.1 People’s Plan in Kerala
Planning is a process in public governance that analyses
situation, identify the needs, sets the priorities, allocates the resources
and fixes the targets for achieving the pre-determined objectives. A
plan must be a realistic account of the expectations.
Decentralized planning is an integral part of national planning.
It refers to the plan of the local governments at the sub-state level at
the district or below. It is nothing but participating process plan
formulation by the local governments as a part of national and state
planning. The concept of philosophy of decentralized planning
received renewed attention in India with 73rd and 74th Constitutional
Amendment Acts of 1992. In response to this national initiative, the
United Democratic Front Government under the stewardship of
A.KAntony introduced the Kerala State Panchayat Raj Bill in the
state legislature and the new act confirmed to the mandatory
Provisions of the constitution (Prakash, 2004).The Kerala Panchayat
Raj Act 1994 envisaged a three– tier system with the gram Panchayat
at the grass-roots level, the block Panchayat at the intermediate level
and the district Panchayat at the district level. The official
inauguration of decentralized planning or people’s planning in Kerala
158
was done by E.K Nayanar on 17th August 1996 at
Thiruvananthapuram.
In Kerala, many of the development works under Ninth five
year plan are being carried out through a unique planning exercise,
Peoples Planning Campaign (PPC), in which the planning process
originates at the grassroots levels of the society. Down to earth and
the most needed projects are discussed at the level of the Gram
Panchayat. In addition to planning, execution of certain projects is
done by beneficiaries themselves through committees’. Hence,
though it is named peoples planning, in the real sense, It is not the
planning but implementation as well. E.M Sreedharan, who was a
member of Planning Board described People’s planning as the
concretization of the Gram Swaraj (Thomas and Richard, 2002).The
two most important hall mark of PPC are “power to masses” and
“transparency”. Power to masses to enable them to plan and execute
projects they require most and transparency’ to wipe out corruption
and nepotism.
5.1.1 Salient Features of the Decentralized Planning
The salient features of the decentralized planning framework
that has evolved since mid-1996 in the state are:
1. The Left Democratic Front Government which came to
power in May 1996, took the momentous decision to devolve 35-40
percent of the State Plan funds to the local bodies as against 2.35
percent during the Eighth Plan (Oommen, 2004) This massive fiscal
decentralization is characterized as a ‘big bang’ approach. Each local
159
body was required to prepare a comprehensive area plan before it
could lay claim to this plan fund. The underlying objective of the
people’s plan initiative was to rally behind the local governments, the
bureaucracy, the technocracy and the people.
2. The decision to devolve a big plan share of plan funds to
LSGs was followed up by a series of legislative amendments to the
Kerala Panchayat Act, 1994 and Kerala Municipal Act 1994 and
institutional reforms (most of them recommended by the Committee
on Decentralization of Powers, popularly called Sen Committee) that
virtually sought to provide functions, finance and functionaries, along
with autonomy and powers to the local government.
In the words of the Sen Committee:“Local self-government is
essentially the empowerment of the people by giving them not only
the voice, but the power of choice as well, in order to shape the
development they feel is appropriate to their situation. It implies
maximum decentralization of powers to the elected bodies to function
as autonomous units with adequate power, authority and resources to
discharge the basic responsibility of bringing about ‘economic
development and social justice”.
Based on the principle of subsidiary, Kerala has divided the
functions of the various tiers of the rural and urban local governments
into activities and sub activities. Compared to other states this is an
important milestone in the progress of decentralization process in the
country in ensuring role clarity and functional autonomy.
160
3. All the expenditure responsibilities dealing with poverty
alleviation and all state-sponsored and centrally sponsored schemes
for poverty alleviation are transferred to the newly created three-
tiered Panchayat Raj Institutions (PRIs), notably to the village
Panchayat. The state government’s role is now limited to monitoring
and capacity-building. This is not the case in the other states in India.
4. Planning was used as an “instrument of social mobilization”
during the People’s Plan Campaign. This is very much in the public
action tradition of Kerala.
5. The plan entitlement of each local government is decided
according to a formula with sixty percentage weightage on
population, and a one third weightage to backwardness, to bring in an
equalization element besides some incentive for tax efforts. All grants
are provided in a separate document called Appendix IV of the State
Budget passed by the State Assembly. Theoretically, the
departmental heads have very little power.
6. A detailed methodology of decentralized planning, from
needs identification by the Gram Sabha to final approval by the
District Planning Committee needed for administrative sanction in
implementing projects, had been drawn up by the State Planning
Board. Local planning in Kerala involves a multi-stage process that
has broadened the avenues of people’s participation.
The size of the plan depends on the local resources which the
local body can raise (own source revenue, beneficiary contribution,
voluntary contribution etc) and the plan grants from the state and the
161
Centre (by way of Centrally Sponsored Schemes). The plans thus
formulated are consolidated with the higher-level plans (block and
district level) during which all projects are vetted for technical and
financial viability.
Besides strengthening the traditional audit system through
Local Fund Audit Department, a special concurrent audit system
called Performance Audit system has been instituted to serve as a
mid-course corrective and guiding mechanism to put the fledging
systems of local governments in proper place. As part of PPC,
considerable attention was given to what has come to be called social
audit. Basically, social audit as it came to be experimented in Kerala
refers to the evaluation of the quality, fund utilization, punctuality in
observing time schedule and general performance of the project
works of local governments through beneficiary committees and
further by the Gram Sabha.Criteria-based selection of beneficiaries is
another significant feature of Kerala’s decentralization.This is
ensured through clear enunciation of eligibility and prioritization
criteria, application in writing, awarding of marks to each criterion,
reading out of marks in Gram Sabha/Ward Sabha meetings and so on.
7. The devolution of over one-third of state plan funds to local
governments as untied grant gives them considerable autonomy. But
it is subject to the condition that 40 percent of the plan allocation is
spent on productive sectors, 10 percent for women-related projects
called Women Component Plan (WCP) and that not more than 30
percent is to be spent on infrastructure. The emphasis on building the
production base especially of the agricultural sector is particularly
162
important, given the longstanding stagnation of the agricultural sector
of Kerala. The plan allocation specially earmarked for scheduled
castes and tribes [called Special Component Plan (SCP) and Tribal
Sub Plan (TSP)] administered by bureaucracy are now passed on to
the local self-governments and involve SC/ST representatives.
8.The village Panchayats, which interact with the Gram Sabha
(GS) and which alone have revenue-raising powers among the rural
local bodies are given more functions and resources (70%of rural
share of plan as against 15% each to the block and district
Panchayats).The gram sabha is strengthened and empowered legally.
It is mandated that the GS meets at least four times a year. Every
ward has a gram sabha whose functions range from expressing the
local needs and fixing plan priorities to supervising projects. For the
first time in India, the Gram Panchayats have started to make their
own plans and that too with considerable involvement of the people.
9. A massive capacity-building exercise in a cascading fashion
(involving 600 Key Resources Persons (KRPs) at the state level,
10,000 District Resource Persons (DRPs) at the district/block level
and 100,000 resources persons at the local level (LRPs)) has been
launched under the Kerala Institute of Local Administration (KILA).
With the abolition of the campaign process, this corps also
disappeared.
10. Availability of internal resources is one of the basic
conditions for successful decentralized governance and autonomy.
Relatively speaking, Kerala has a strong own resource base. Kerala
Panchayats on an average raise a per capita own revenue (taxes and
163
non-tax revenue) of Rs57 (1998-99) compared to less than one rupee
in Uttar Pradesh (1997-98) and Rs16 (2000-01) in Karnataka where
decentralization ostensibly made headway. This shows that Kerala
has considerable local choice. Given the fact that only 40 percent of
the tax potential of Kerala is tapped, there is immense scope for local
choice in Kerala and expanding the plan size.
11. The active association of local governments with
Kudumbasree, the State Poverty Eradication Mission,which is a poor
women-oriented self-help group initiative against poverty has taken
the antipoverty efforts from a project approach to a holistic process
approach.Apart from the women-oriented Community Based
Organizations (CBOs) associated with the Kudumbashree, as part of
the People’s Plan initiative, CBOs Including all households (poor as
well as non-poor) have been started in some Gram Panchayats (GPs)
as part of its social mobilization and social auditing effort. They were
formed in order to get involved in the selection of beneficiaries,
cultural activities, projects like education, health, drinking water and
promotion of village level unity and so on.
5.1.2 Objective of Peoples Planning Campaign (PPC)
Its aim was to achieve a sustainable model of development;
local empowerment and environmental protection through people’s
participation in the planning and implementation process, based on
the belief that the people know best what is good for
them.Strengthening of local government, solving the developmental
crisis and initiate a new development culture are the important
objectives of PPC (Joy and Ekbal –PPC).
164
5.1.3 Programme design
The Kerala State Planning Board (KSPB) played a pivotal role
in helping local governments to formulate the plan with people’s
participation. In order to educate and build the capacity of people’s
representatives, officials, voluntary activists and experts for the same,
the KSPB organized several training programmes that included
nearly 50,000 participants (Foundation India, 2011).
The six stages of the people’s plan comprised of gram sabha
meetings, development seminars, task forces, plan document, block
and district Panchayat plans and District Planning Committees as
depicted in the figure 5.1.
Stage One: Gram Sabha Meetings
The first stage was to hold local assemblies in each of Kerala’s
erstwhile 14149 village wards and urban neighbourhoods. In these
assemblies, people’s representatives and voluntary activists were
provided training in organizing gram sabhas and ward sabhas (in
municipalities) to discuss developmental issues by forming different
sectoral groups. Practical and contextualized solutions often emerged
out of these meetings.
Stage Two: Development Seminars
Once community members discussed their development related
problems and solutions for them, the local self government prepared
detailed development reports that analyzed local development issues
and resources available. Development seminars were held at the
165
Panchayat/municipality level to discuss the report and the suggestions
of the gram sabhas. Local level plans and project ideas were
formulated in these seminars.
Stage Three: Task Forces
In this stage, task forces were created that consisted of experts
selected at the development seminars.The task forces were
responsible for preparation of detailed project proposals for the
annual plan.
Stage Four: Plan Document
The local self government institutions held their council
meetings in which annual plan document for the local bodies were
finalized by prioritizing the projects based on the funds devolved
from the state government and locally available resources.
Stage Five: Block and District Panchayat plans
The block and district Panchayat samitis finalized the annual
plans by integrating and supplementing the project proposals from the
grass roots.
Stage six: District Planning Committees (DPC)
District Planning Committees are statutory bodies formed
under the constitution. These are responsible for examining the plan
proposals of each local body in the district, duly recommended by the
technical expert groups in various sectors and gave approval to the
plans that fulfilled the guidelines. Funds for the development of the
166
projects were made available only after approval by the DPCs.The
implementation of the plan projects was also organized in different
stages similar to the stages involved in the process of project
planning.These included selection of beneficiaries in the gram sabha
meetings, formation of local beneficiary committees for
implementation and monitoring committees for supervision of the
project.All of these processes were aimed at ensuring people’s
participation and transparency in the development process.
167
Figure 5.1
Six Stages of Planning under People’s Planning Campaign
168
5.1.4 Three Tier Panchayat System
In the first year of Ninth plan, 40% of the state‘s budget was
allotted to the panchayats. Grama sabha, the bottom most democratic
body, in which all citizens are expected to participate, is a platform
for people to express opinions, and to share information on the
development needs of a locality. Transparent selection of
beneficiaries for schemes benefiting individuals is one of the
important activities that take place in the gram sabha. In the
decentralized governance, there are three levels of panchayats
(commonly refers to as the three –tier system) at the district,the
block, and the gram panchayat (village).Block panchayats are the hub
of the activities in PPC, as there exists an experienced administrative
set up catering to a cluster of panchayat under it. Block development
officer (BDO) function as the block panchayat secretary. He is in
charge of matters connected with a central assistance and its
utilization in the capacity of BDO.A co-coordinator is appointed on
deputation to function at the block level.
Initially only projects using plan funds of state were taken for
PPC.Now the development works under centrally sponsored schemes
also come under PPC.The projects planned by common people are
prioritized and consolidated in the plan Documents of the
panchayats.There is no financial limit fixed for the panchayat body to
accord administration sanction. For according technical sanction to
projects, committees consisting of working and retrieved officials are
constituted at block and district level. These are referred to as Block
Level Expert committee (BLEC) and District Level Expert committee
169
respectively. Technical sanction is accorded subject to delegated
powers. All the projects submitted by grama panchayats in standard
format and in local language after screening by BLEC are submitted
to district planning committee (DPC) for approval. After this,
technical sanction to projects is accorded based on detailed estimates
and according to standard procedures.
5.2 Housing Sector and People’s Planning Campaign
The People’s planning Campaign has created a conducive
environment in pushing housing of the poor in to the main agenda of
the development strategy of the local governments.It also recognized
that shelter and development are mutually supportive. It encouraged
three Panchayat samithi’s to formulate enabling policies for
facilitating the poor and the weaker sections to have a livable,
lovable and affordable shelter (Chandradutt, 2000).Now the
panchayat Raj Institution has started functioning full steam,
implementation of District Rural Development Agency (DRDA)
schemes is widely decentralized. In the case of housing, the role of
DRDA is being marginalized, the block development office is turned
in to the block panchayat body, comprising elected people’s
representatives at the block panchayat level that finally decides the
beneficiaries. Housing schemes, which used to be executed earlier
directly by DRDA, are now transferred to grama panchayats.
Towards the end of the second quarter of 1999-2000, DRDA
has come under the district panchayat. Gramsabha select beneficiaries
according to a standard pattern, based on standard selection norms.
The lists from gram sabhas are prioritized at the grampanchayat level.
170
The selected list of beneficiaries is sent to the block panchayat.The
list submitted by the grama panchayat is automatically approved. The
selected lists are consolidated at the block level (Meenakshy and
Ajithkumar,2000).Thus the selection has become transparent and
popular. The following schematic diagram (5.2) depicts the
beneficiaries selection process under people’s planning.
Fig 5.2 (Schematic Diagram)
Beneficiary Selection Process under People’s Planning.
BP - Block Panchayat, GP- Gram Panchayat,
GS- Gram sabha,
NGH- Neighborhood Group
171
5.2.1 Different Steps in the Beneficiary Selection
The following steps are involved in the process:
Step 1: Block panchayat informs gram panchayat the scheme and the
expected number of beneficiaries under each section such as
SCs/STs, others and widows.
Step 2: Gram panchayats give wide publicity regarding the scheme
through exhibits and announcement. In the gramsabhas, the number
and type of beneficiaries to be selected under each section are
exhibited in transparent manner.
Step 3: Neighburhood groups (NHGs) identify the beneficiaries and
present them in gram sabhas.
Step 4: Gram sabhas enlist beneficiaries and submit lists to the
grampanchayat.
Step 5: List from gramsabhas consolidated at the gram panchayat
level.
Step 6: Prioritization of beneficiaries from all the gramsabhas by
vetting score sheets.
Step 7: Gram panchayat submits the selected list of beneficiaries
approved bythe panchayat body to block panchayat.
Step 8: Block informs the panchayats of the selected list, which is
given wide publicity by the gram panchayat.
172
It should be taken as a positive aspect as the process is
transparent and any misdeed can be found out immediately. Since the
selection process is completed at the gram panchayat level itself, the
block panchayat does not have much decision making to perform on
the list submitted by the grama panchayat.
5.3 Community Housing Schemes in Kerala
Homeless or poor housing conditions often reflect the
amplitude of poverty. In today’s market based society, needs are
fulfilled based on the financial ability of the individual rather than its
importance. As a result, the poor have to be satisfied with the lowest
quality of housing and living environment provided by the
commercial market. They cannot afford to pay the economic rent for
housing accommodation of even the minimum standards. The poor
also have less accessibility to loans from banks since they have no
security to mortgage. So their dreams of houses can be realized only
through community housing schemes.
At present, major state government aided housing schemes for
economically weaker sections are the EMS Total Housing
scheme,Tribal Housing Scheme, New Suraksha Housing Scheme,
Schemes of SC and ST departments, Fishermen Housing Scheme,
Bhavanasree, Asraya and M.N Laksham veedu Punar Nirmana
Padhathi. Centrally sponsored housing Schemes such as Indira Awas
Yojana, Valmiki Ambedkar Awas Yojana (VAMBAY) Integrated
Housing and Slum Development Project (IHSDP), Basic Srvices to
Urban Poor (BSUP), National Fishermen Welfare Fund (NFWF),
Interest Subsidy Scheme for Housing and Urban Poor (ISHUP) and
173
Affordable Housing in Partnership (AHP) are also aimed at providing
financial assistance for constructing houses for the pooreconomically
weaker sections in the state. Jawaharla Nehru National Urban
Renewal Mission (JNNURAM) targets acceleration of supply of land,
shelter and infrastructure with special emphasis to provision of basic
service to urban poor and upgradation of slums. The newly
introduced scheme of Rajiv Awas Yojana (RAY) also focuses on
resolving the emerging needs of poor people in slums due to
urbanization (Government of Kerala, 2011).
Three important community housing schemes in Kerala which
comes under our perview are Indira Awas Yojana, EMS Housing
Scheme and M.N Laksham Veedu Reconstruction project. All these
are being implemented in Thrissur District also.
5.3.1 Indira Awas yojana (IAY)
This scheme was launched during 1985-86 as a sub-scheme of
Rural Landless Employment Guarantee programme (RLEGP) and
continued as a sub-scheme of JawaharRozgar Yojana (JRY)since its
launching from 1989. It has been delinked from the JRY and has been
made an independent scheme with effect from January 1, 1996.
The objective of IAY is primarily to provide grants for
construction of houses to members of scheduled castes/scheduled
tribes, freed bonded labourers and also to non SC/ST rural poor
below the poverty line. This is a centrally sponsored scheme funded
on cost sharing basis between the Government of India and the state
governments in the ratio of 75:25. In the case of North-Eastern states
174
and Sikkim, funding will be shared between the Government of India
and these states in the ratio of 90:10 respectively. In the case of
Union Territories, the entire fund is provided by the Government of
India.
The available resources under the scheme in a district are
earmarked for various categories as under: (a) At least 60% of the
total IAY funds and physical targets should be utilized for
construction/up gradation of dwelling units for SC/ST BPL
households
(b) maximum of 40% for non SC/ST rural households
(c) IAY funds and physical targets will be earmarked for BPL
minorities in each state as indicated by the Ministry
(d) 3% of the funds are for physically and mentally challenged
persons. If any particular category is not available in a district,
allocation can be utilized for other categories as per priorities given in
the guidelines after it has been certified to this effect by the zilla
parishad /District Rural Development Agency (DRDA) concerned.
5.3.1.1 Identification of Beneficiaries:
The District Panchayat/Zilla Panchayat /DRDA on the basis of
allocations made and targets fixed shall decide the number of houses
to be constructed/upgraded panchayat wise under IAY during a
particular financial year. The same shall be intimated to the Gram
Panchayat concerned. Thereafter, the beneficiaries, restricting to this
number will be selected from the permanent IAY wait list prepared
175
on the basis of BPL list in order of seniority in the list. The Gram
Panchayat may draw out the shelterless family from the BPL list
strictly in the order of ranking in the list. Separate list of SC/ST
families in the order of their ranks may be derived from the larger
IAY list so that the process of allotment of 60% of houses under the
scheme is facilitated. Thus at any given time, there would be two
IAY wait list for reference, one for SC/ST families and the other for
non SC/ST families. Once the lists are prepared, they need to be
approved by the Gram sabha to be attended by a government servant
who would be a nominee of the collector.
The selection by the Gram sabha is final. No approval by a
higher authority is required. Zilla parishad /DRDAs and Block
Development Offices should however be sent a list of selected
beneficiaries for their information. The permanent IAY waitlists so
prepared will be displaced at a prominent place either in the Gram
Panchayat office or any other suitable place in the village. The list
will also be put on the web site by the concerned DRDAs.
5.3.1.2 Priority in the Selection of Beneficiaries
Prioritization of beneficiaries will be as follow:
I. Freed bond labourers
II. SC/ST households :
SC/ST households who are victims of atrocity
SC/ST households headed by widows and unmarried women
176
SC/ST households affected by flood, natural calamities like
earthquake, cyclone and manmade calamities like riot.
Other SC/ST households;
III. Families/widows of personnel from defence Services/
paramilitary forces killed in action.
IV. Non-SC/ST BPL households
V. Physically and mentally challenged persons.
VI. Ex-service men and retired members of the paramilitary forces
VII.Displaced persons on account of development projects,
nomadic/semi nomadic and de-notified tribal, families with
physically /mentally challenged members.
The selection of the beneficiaries will be subject to the
condition that the households of all the above categories except III
are below poverty line.
The upper limit of construction assistance under IAY during
1985 was Rs 6000 in ordinary (plain) areas. The extra amount for
hilly terrain was 30% of the total subsidy. It has risen to Rs12700 in
ordinary areas and Rs 14500 in hilly areas during 1993-94 and
revised to Rs20000 and Rs 22000 during 1996-97 (Government of
India, Indira Awwas Yojana) The assistance has risen from Rs35000
for general category family, Rs50000 for SC and Rs75000 for ST
below poverty line in the year 2000 to Rs 50000, Rs75000 and Rs
100000 for general category, SC and ST respectively in 2008.Now it
177
is Rs 75000, Rs 100000 and Rs 125000 for general category, SC and
ST respectively.The entire amount should not be paid to the
beneficiary in lump-sum. It is made in instalments in cheque and is
linked to the progress of work.
5.3.1.3 Conditions Involved in the Construction
The following conditions are to be fulfilled in the construction
of houses:
1. Involvement of Beneficiaries-The beneficiaries should be
involved in the construction of the house. To this end, the
beneficiaries may make their own arrangement for procurement of
construction material, engage skilled workmen and also contribute
family labour. The beneficiaries will have complete freedom as to the
manner of construction of the house which is their own. This will
result in economy in cost, ensure quality of construction, lead to
satisfaction on the part of beneficiaries and acceptance of the house.
The responsibility for the proper construction of the house will thus
be on the beneficiaries themselves. Zilla parishads/DRDAs can help
the beneficiaries in acquiring raw material on control rates, if they so
desire or request the Zilla parishads /DRDAs in this regard.
2. Ban on Contractors or Departmental Construction- No
contractor or government department is allowed in the construction of
IAY houses. If any case of construction through contractors comes to
notice, Government of India will have a right to recover the
allocation made to the state for those IAY houses. Government
departments or organizations can give technical assistance or arrange
178
for coordinated supply of raw materials such as cement, steel or
bricks if the beneficiaries so desire. The spirit of the IAY is that the
house is not to be constructed and delivered by any agency; on the
other hand, the house is to be constructed by the ultimate occupier of
the house.
3. Appropriate construction Technology and local materials.
While fixing technical specifications, efforts should be made to
utilize the maximum possible extent, local materials and cost
effective technologies developed by various institutions. Technology
using bricks, cement and steel on large scale should be substituted by
lime and lime surkhi manufactured locally. Bricks manufactured by
beneficiaries themselves may also be undertaken for reduction of cost
and better wage employment.
4. Type design- The lay out, size and type design of IAY houses
should depend on the local conditions. No type design should be
prescribed for IAY house except that the plinth area of houses should
be around 20 m2.The houses should be designed in accordance with
the desire of the beneficiaries keeping in view the climate conditions
and the need to provide proper space, kitchen, ventilation, sanitary
facilities, smokeless chullah and the community perceptions,
preferences and cultural attitude.
5. Drinking water supply- The availability of drinking water should
be ensured by the agencies responsible for the implementation of the
IAY. Where necessary, a hand-pump should be installed on the site
before the work is started, from the funds available under Rural
Water Supply or other similar programmes.
179
6. Sanitation and Sanitary latrines- Sanitation and Sanitary latrines
forms an integral part of IAY houses. The Government of India
attaches considerable importance to the construction of sanitary
latrines as a sanitary measure and therefore, sanitary latrines should
invariably be taken up as a part of the IAY houses. A system of
drainage from the houses should also be provided to avoid overflow
from the kitchen and bathroom.
7. Environmental Improvement and Social Forestry.
Plantation of trees in the entire habitat or around the individual
house should be taken up simultaneously. Trees may be planted near
the housing clusters so that in due course, enough trees are available
nearby to enable the beneficiaries to get fuel/ fodder/small timber.
Such plantations can be taken up under the social forestry
programme.
8. Involvement of voluntary organizations- Suitable local
voluntary agencies should be associated with the construction of IAY
houses. In particular the voluntary agencies should be made use of to
popularize the use of sanitary latrine and also in the construction of
smokeless chullahs.
9. Inventory of Houses- The implementing agencies should have a
complete inventory of houses constructed under IAY, giving details
of the date of start of construction and the date of completion of
houses, cost involved, number of houses allotted, name of the village
and Block in which the houses are located, name, address, occupation
and category of beneficiaries and other relevant particulars.
180
10. Display of IAY Board and Logo-
On completion of an IAY house, the DRDA concerned should ensure
that for each house so constructed, A board is set up displaying
clearly the house built under IAY and should indicate the IAY Logo,
name of beneficiary and the year of construction.
5.3.2 EMS Housing Scheme
The EMS Housing Scheme envisaged with the objective that
there should be no homeless family in the state. It was estimated that
there are 2 lakhs landless families and a total of 5 lakh houseless
families in Kerala as on June 2008 (Government of Kerala emshouse,
2011). EMS Scheme launched by the Government of Kerala aims at
providing house sites to all landless families and house to all
houseless families coming under the BPL category. The scheme will
be implemented by the local bodies with the support of government.
At the tenth death anniversary of EMS Namboodiripad (first chief
minister of Kerala) V.S.Achuthanandan performed the state level
inauguration of the scheme at Kodakkara,Thrissur. The Minister for
Local Self Government, Paloli Mohammedkutty presided over the
function. The scheme named after the first chief minister of Kerala,
E.M.S Namboodiripad was started in 2009. This is purely a state
funded scheme. The fund required is to be raised from the plan fund;
by the way of raising loans from Banks especially Co-operative
Banks by Urban Local Bodies (ULB) and other sources like
contribution from NRI’s Government servants, and NGOs etc. It is a
total subsidized scheme to the beneficiaries.
181
5.3.2.1 Objectives
The objectives of E.M.S Housing Schemes are the following :
1. Provision of house to all houseless below poverty line.
2. Provision of land and house to all landless, houseless people below
poverty line.
3. Reconstruction of the dilapidated houses which are constructed
under One Lakh Housing scheme.
5.3.2.2 Identification of Beneficiaries
In the Gram Panchayat, services of village extension officer,
overseer, Lady Village extension officer, and other officers under the
control of Gram Panchayat, and in the municipal corporation, the
services of agricultural field officers and other officers of the
corporation are used to identify the beneficiaries. Two such members
form a group and will have equal responsibility in the identification
of the beneficiaries. Group will visit the places and evaluate the
situation for preparing the report on prescribed format.
While identifying the beneficiaries, they should follow some
criteria:-
a) The beneficiaries must be from the B.P.L. list (not only SC,ST but
other categories also).
b) They should not have their own house or huts or those having
dilapidated house.
182
c) They should have ration cards
d) If any one of the family members have a house, they are not
eligible for financial help.
e) Deserving families having no land or landless houseless families,
without ration cards will be given financial help on the basis of
examination of District Collector
Families from B.P.L.list are excluded from financial help if :
(i) any one of the family members are employed in the government,
private, quasi government, aided or co-operative institutions (class I
to class IV employees)) and pensioners in such institutions.
(ii) they are permanent employees of the government or private
institutions (except employees of traditional industries, plantation
workers)
(iii) they own concrete houses with plinth area of 10000square feet
(iv) they have four wheelers for their own use or more than one,
three wheelers or four wheelers even as taxi
(v) any one of the family members is employed in foreign countries
(vi) they own more than one acre agricultural land (exception for ST
5.3.2.3 Eligibility Test
1. Selection of beneficiaries from BPL list is on the basis of risk
factors (risk factors are shown in the table 5.1)
183
2. Eligibility of the selected beneficiaries is tested by a team of two
officials and their report is discussed and it is sanctioned in the gram
sabha.
3. If any case of ineligible beneficiaries comes to notice, witnessing
officials are liable to refund the principal amount with interest.
Secretary of gram Panchayat/corporation should ensure that
beneficiary families are included in the list only after examination.
Digital photo of the family of the eligible beneficiary standing in
front of their existing house is to be taken by the examining officials
Table 5.1
Risk factors
SL.No Risk factors Marks
1 Women headed family (below 65years) 5
2 Unmarried mother/divorced women/divorced member in the family
5
3 Family members having serious diseases 5
4 No family members permanently employed in Govt, semi -Govt and private organizations
5
5 School drop-outs below 20 years 5
6 Family member with more than 65 years 5
7 Physically, mentally challenged member 10
8 a.SC/ST family/
b.Members engaged in traditional occupation
10
184
SL.No Risk factors Marks
9 Ashraya yojana family 5
10 Landless family 10
11 Family residing in Puramboke 20
12 a. Family with no house,b. hut,c. houses thatched with grass and leaf, d. Partially completed houses/poor house.
10,7,5,3 respectively
13 Families without sanitary latrines 5
14 Families with no access to drinking water facility within 500 meter (100meter in hill areas)
5
15 Family without the facility of electricity. 5
Total marks (family which obtain 18 or above will be considered as BPL )
Source: Local self Government Department. Application form.EMS Housing Scheme
Government of Kerala
5.3.2.4 Nature of Assistance for Purchasing Land and
Construction of House
If the beneficiaries themselves purchase land for construction
of house, SC, ST, Asraya yojana families, people living by the side of
railway track, road,and puramboke are eligible for Rs 75000 in gram
Panchayat,Rs90000in municipality and Rs100000 in municipal
corporations. Others in the general category are eligible for Rs 37500
in gram Panchayat, Rs 45000 in municipality and 50,000 in
municipal corporations. This amount can be used to purchase 2 to 4
185
cents of land in rural areas and 1½ to 4 cents in municipal areas
(Local Self Government Department, Eleventh Plan)
The aid for each general category of the BPL family was
Rs 50000 for SC and mentally and physically challenged persons
belonging to general category was Rs 75000 and for ST and Ashraya
yojana families Rs100000. Now the rates are revised for different
categories. The aid for each general category of BPL family will be
Rs 75000, for SC and physically and mentally challenged persons
Rs100000 and for ST and Ashraya yojana families Rs125000 as
shown in the table 5.2.
The new rates will be applicable for renovation of M.N
Laksham veedu houses, I.A.Y.and all other housing schemes being
implemented by Local Self Government Institutions.Financial aid is
not given in lump sum. It is given in four instalments after getting the
stage certificate from the concerned village extension officer.
186
Table.5.2
Financial Help for House Construction under E.M.S Housing
Scheme (in Rs) In
stal
men
t
Com
plet
ion
of
activ
ities
gene
ral
SC/p
hysi
cally
ch
alle
nged
ST/A
shra
ya
yoja
na fa
mily
Subs
idy
(per
cent
age)
1 Preparation
of land for
foundation
22500 30000 37500 30
2 Completion
of
foundation
30000 40000 50000 40
3 Completion
of roof
15000 20000 25000 20
4 Fixation of
windows
and doors
7500 10000 12500 10
Total subsidy 75000 100000 125000 100
Source : Eleventh plan Janakiyasuthranam. Thozhilum veedum. janakiya
campaign.E.M.S housing scheme.
187
5.3.2.5 Conditions for the Construction of Houses under E.M.S
Housing Scheme
Houses constructed under E.M.S Housing scheme must satisfy
certain conditions. They are as follows:-
1. The basement area of house should be between 20 and 40 meter
square. Now it is revised and maximum area should be 60 meter
square
2. The roof should be tiled or concrete and should not be made of
asbestos
3. Outside doors should be fixed
4. The house should be electrified out of the financial aid
5. The house should have sanitary latrines and smokeless chulah
6. This house should not be resold for a period of ten years.
The beneficiaries should submit the following documents in the
village office:-
1. Pocession certificate
2. Tax receipt for the year 2009-10
3. Ration card, photocopy of 1stand 4th pages of the ration card and
two passport size photos
188
4. Caste certificate from tahsildar for scheduled castes and scheduled
tribe
5. Disability certificate for physically and mentally challenged.
Beneficiaries are eligible for the following concessions:
1. They are exempted from stamp duty and registration fee for the
land allotted to the landless
2. They can employ the workers from ‘Employment Guarantee
Scheme’ for preparing the land for basement, filling the land etc.
They should not pay them wages
3. They are exempted from the payment of permit fees for
construction
4. They should submit only the sketch and not the elaborated plan
for construction.
5.3.2.6 Finance for the Project
The major source of finance is the plan fund of local self
government and loan from the Banks. Local government can take
loans equal to 10 times of 15% of the plan fund. Voluntary
contributions from individual organizations, N.R.I can also be used
for E.M.S housing fund. Minister for Panchayat and Social Welfare
M.K Muneer said in the assembly that the government proposed to
continue the EMS Housing scheme. Replying to the debate on the
demands for grants for panchayats, social security and welfare, the
Minister said that implementation of the scheme was not very
189
effective. Only 10000 of the one lakh applicants without land could
be provided with houses (The Hindu, Oct.21,2011). Money was also
misused for constructing second storeys to buildings. However, the
scheme would be continued till the extended time limit.
Pointing out that not even 10 houses could be completed under
the scheme in the capital city, (TVM) the Opposition UDF accused
the Corporation of abject failure in implementing the project.
According to them, the assistance provided for constructing houses
was woefully inadequate. Admitting that the poor availability of land
was a major hurdle to the project, the treasury benches called on the
government to refrain from scrapping the project on political
grounds. Mayor K.Chandrika found that more than 6,000
beneficiaries, including 4619 landless families, had been identified
for the EMS scheme in the city and the Corporation, had disbursed
Rs1.3 crore as assistance for construction of houses and purchasing
land (The Hindu,June 26,2011). According to Mr.Padmakumar,
chairman of the standing committee on works the prohibitive price of
land in the city was forcing the Corporation to hunt for property in
suburban areas for mass housing projects. Opposition councilors
continued to taunt the ruling front with allegations of poor
implementation.
According to K.Maheswaran Nair, UDF leader, the poor
performance of the scheme was an affront to the memory of the
former Chief Minister E.M.S Namboodiripad after whom it was
named. He opined that it was better to scrap the scheme that had
fallen far short of the objectives.P.Ashokkumar, BJP leader suggested
190
to have additional funds from the government and enhance the outlay
for the project to match the steep land price and soaring cost of
construction.
5.3.3 M.N.Laksham Veedu Reconstruction Project (M.N
Laksham Veedu Punarnirmana Padhathi)
Laksham Veedu Project was started in Kerala in 1972 under
the leadership of M.N.Govindhan Nair, the then minister for Housing.
Under this scheme 57,590 single houses and 16,309 twin houses were
constructed during 1972 to 1976 (Housing Department 2009).Active
participation and financial support from students, voluntary
organizations, government employees, quasi government employees
and private employees made it a unique project. But these houses
became very old and they are to be repaired and renovated.
With this objective, Laksham Veedu Renovation Project was
implemented in the year 2004 and 2172 houses were renovated. This
scheme was renamed M.N.Laksham Veedu Reconstruction Project on
19-09-2008 (M.N.LakshamVeedu Punarnirmana Padhathi). During
the Eleventh plan, it is targeted to reconstruct 60000 houses. A list of
dilapidated houses of Laksham veedu colony is to be prepared
(Economic Review 2010). Project is to be implemented in such
colonies and all deserving families in a colony are to be benefited
from the project at a time.
Financial help of Rs 50000 for the general category, Rs 75000
for SC and families with physically and mentally disabled members
Rs 100000 for ST and Ashraya Yojana is given in the scheme. Now
191
the rate is revised as Rs 75000 for general category, Rs 100000 for
SC and family with physically and mentally disabled members and
Rs125000 for ST and Ashraya families.
Table 5.3 Financial Allotment in Instalments
Source: Govt of Kerala.Housing department ‘M.N. Laksham Veedu Reconstruction project
‘Guideline 2009’. KSHB
Kerala State Housing Board will provide 50% of the financial
help as the share of the state government and 50% is to be met by the
local Self government institutions from their plan fund. The Housing
Board will help the beneficiary to prepare suitable housing plan. It
will give technical advice to the beneficiary at different stages of
house construction. Financial help is allotted in four instalments as
shown in the table 5.3.
Out of the total subsidy, 30 percent will be given as the first
instalment, after preparing the land for foundation of the house,
40 % after completion of foundation, 20 % after completion of roof
and the last instalment of 10 % after fixing windows and doors. The
implementing officer of the housing projects of gram Panchayat and
Instalment Subsidy (in percentage) Stage of completion
1 30 Preparing the land for foundation
2 40 completion of foundation
3 20 completion of roof
4 10 Fixation of windows and doors
192
municipal corporations will be implementing the MN Lasham veedu
reconstruction project also. Stage certificate is to be given by the
village extension officer or lady village extension officer as directed
by the local self government to the beneficiary. During 2009-10 and
2010-11, up to 30-9-2010, the KSHB has renovated 3286 units and an
amount of Rs 19.44 crores has been spent for the scheme.
People’s plan campaign of Kerala has created a conducive
environment in pushing the Community Housing Schemes in to the
main agenda of development strategy of the local governments. It
recognizes that shelter and development are mutually supportive. So
it encouraged the three tier Panchayat Samithi’s to formulate enabling
policies for facilitating the poor and the weaker sections to have a
comfortable and affordable shelter. The poor people’s need for
shelter can be met through the Community Housing Schemes (CHS)
since their financial capability is weak. The CHS like EMS Housing
scheme, Indira Awas Yojana (IAY) and M.N Laksham veedu
Punarnirmana (MNLP) scheme are being implemented in Thrissur
district with the objective of enabling the houseless BPL families to
construct a new house or reconstruct their dilapidated houses.
References
Chandradut (2000).People’s Alliance for Housing Thrissur District Total Housing Programme http://decwatch.org?files/icdd/042.pdf Foundation India (2011) Participation Planning to Strengthen Decentralisation-GKC http://India governance.gov.in/files/pp-decentralisation pdf. Government of Kerala, Department of Housing, Kerala State Housing Policy.. http://hsg comr.kerala.gov.in.pdf/ final policykshp.pdf
193
Government of Kerala (2011) EMS Housing Scheme –Kerala Government Logo.http://lsg.kerala.gov.in/en/emshouse.php. Government of Kerala, Economic Review (2010) Government of Kerala. Housing Department MN. laksham Veedu Reconstruction Project Gudeline 2009 KSHB. Government of Kerala. local self government department. Eleventh plan Janakiyasuthranam Thozilum Veedum Janakiya Compaign EMS Housing Scheme. Government of India (Indira Awas Yojana). meg cnrd.gov.in/ forms/IAY.pdf. Mozilla Firefox. Joy Elamen and B.Ekbal Kerala People’s Plan for Decentralisation. www.pitt.edu/-super/3011-4001/3441.ppt. Meenakshy. C.S,Ajithkumar (2000):Kerala Research Programme on Local Development. Women’s participation in Rural housing scheme.Discussion paper series oct. TVM Oommen. M.A (2004) Deepening decentralized Governance in Rural India; Lessons from the People’s plan initiative of Kerala . Centre for Socio economic Environment studies. working paper 11. Prakash B.A (2004)-Kerala’s Economic Development Performance and problem in the post Liberalisation period.sage publications in India New Delhi The Hindu (2011- news by Roy Mathew) EMS Scheme to be continued till March next year.http://www. the hindu.com/ news/states/kerala/article2555712.ece The Hindu (2011) Housing Scheme : Council Seeks enhanced assistance http://www. the hindu.com/2011/06/25/stories/ 2011062563700300 htm. Thomas Issac T.M and Rlchard w.Franke (2002) Local Democracy and Development. The Kerala People's Campaign for decentralised Planning.http://chss.dev.montclair.edu/anthro/
.