Upload
aubrie-maxted
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Chapter 4 The Law of Negligence
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
22
Summary of Objectives
To define tort lawTo define tort law
To identify elements of negligenceTo identify elements of negligence
To assess duty of care in the To assess duty of care in the hospitality industryhospitality industry
To isolate factors that may reduce To isolate factors that may reduce liability for breach of duty of careliability for breach of duty of care
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
33
Elements of Negligence The elements of negligence areThe elements of negligence are
• a duty of care owed by the a duty of care owed by the defendantdefendant
• a breach of the duty of carea breach of the duty of care
• an injury to the plaintiffan injury to the plaintiff
• proximate cause between the proximate cause between the breach and the plaintiff’s injurybreach and the plaintiff’s injury
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
44
Definition of Tort
An intentional or unintentional An intentional or unintentional injury (other than a breach of injury (other than a breach of contract) to the victim’scontract) to the victim’s
• bodybody
• mindmind
• propertyproperty
• pocketbookpocketbook
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
55
Duty of Care
Everyone has a duty to take Everyone has a duty to take reasonable care to avoid causing reasonable care to avoid causing injury to anyone to whom a duty is injury to anyone to whom a duty is owed.owed.
The Reasonable Person Test – The Reasonable Person Test – what would a careful, thoughtful what would a careful, thoughtful person in the same circumstances person in the same circumstances have done?have done?
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
66
Purposes of Tort Law
Specifically, to restore the injured Specifically, to restore the injured party to the position he or she was party to the position he or she was in before the injuryin before the injury
In general, the primary purposes In general, the primary purposes of tort law are regulation, of tort law are regulation, deterrence, compensation, dispute deterrence, compensation, dispute resolution, education and resolution, education and prevention.prevention.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
77
Intentional Torts
Assault – the threat of serious Assault – the threat of serious unwanted touchingunwanted touching
Battery – the act of serious unwanted Battery – the act of serious unwanted touchingtouching
Trespass – unlawful entry upon Trespass – unlawful entry upon propertyproperty
Conversion – a person without authority Conversion – a person without authority wrongfully takes, retains or disposes of wrongfully takes, retains or disposes of the personal property of anotherthe personal property of another
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
88
Intentional Torts 2 False Imprisonment – confining or False Imprisonment – confining or
detaining someone without lawful detaining someone without lawful authorityauthority
Intentional Infliction of Mental Suffering – Intentional Infliction of Mental Suffering – deliberately causing mental sufferingdeliberately causing mental suffering
Deceit – fraudulently misleading anotherDeceit – fraudulently misleading another
Intentional Interference with a Contract – Intentional Interference with a Contract – urging someone to breach a binding urging someone to breach a binding contractcontract
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
99
Defences to Intentional Torts ConsentConsent
Self defenceSelf defence
Defence of propertyDefence of property
Defence of a third personDefence of a third person
NecessityNecessity
Legal authorityLegal authority
Lack of intentionLack of intention
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1010
Causation and the Burden of Proof A defendant will be liable for A defendant will be liable for
reasonably foreseeable reasonably foreseeable consequences of his or her acts.consequences of his or her acts.
If injury was a likely consequence If injury was a likely consequence of an act, it is not necessary to of an act, it is not necessary to know exactly how such an injury know exactly how such an injury would be caused.would be caused.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1111
Thin Skull Rule
A tortfeasor who can reasonably A tortfeasor who can reasonably foresee some injury as a foresee some injury as a consequence of his or her consequence of his or her conduct may be liable for more conduct may be liable for more serious consequences than he or serious consequences than he or she anticipated.she anticipated.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1212
Res Ipsa Loquitur
means “The thing speaks for itself”means “The thing speaks for itself”
• Without negligence, injury would not normally Without negligence, injury would not normally have occurredhave occurred
The elements areThe elements are
• injury caused by misadventure not normally injury caused by misadventure not normally occurring without negligenceoccurring without negligence
• the thing causing the injury was within the the thing causing the injury was within the defendant’s controldefendant’s control
• the plaintiff did nothing to provoke the accidentthe plaintiff did nothing to provoke the accident
• the plaintiff had no prior knowledge of the dangerthe plaintiff had no prior knowledge of the danger
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1313
Strict Liability
Applies in the context of an Applies in the context of an unnatural use of land or buildings, unnatural use of land or buildings, or hazardous activities and or hazardous activities and productsproducts
The defendant may be found The defendant may be found strictly liable if injury occurs even strictly liable if injury occurs even though precautions were taken.though precautions were taken.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1414
Contributory Negligence If a plaintiff is partly or solely the If a plaintiff is partly or solely the
cause of his or her own injury, the cause of his or her own injury, the amount of compensation will be amount of compensation will be reduced accordingly.reduced accordingly.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1515
Voluntary Assumption of Risk A plaintiff who has participated in an activity A plaintiff who has participated in an activity
knowing that injury might result may be said knowing that injury might result may be said to have assumed the risk voluntarily.to have assumed the risk voluntarily.
The defendant must establish that The defendant must establish that
• the plaintiff knew about the risk and understood the plaintiff knew about the risk and understood itit
• the plaintiff had a choice to avoid the risk but the plaintiff had a choice to avoid the risk but instead voluntarily assumed itinstead voluntarily assumed it
• the defendant was not in breach of any statutory the defendant was not in breach of any statutory duty from which the injuries flowedduty from which the injuries flowed
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1616
Waivers and Disclaimers Waivers are separate contracts. Waivers are separate contracts.
One party agrees not to try to One party agrees not to try to impose liability on the other if impose liability on the other if there is an injury.there is an injury.
Disclaimers are attempts by one Disclaimers are attempts by one party to unilaterally impose on the party to unilaterally impose on the other the terms specified in the other the terms specified in the waiver.waiver.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1717
Vicarious Liability
Employers are responsible for the Employers are responsible for the torts of employees which occur torts of employees which occur while they are performing their while they are performing their duties.duties.
Failure to correct a problem such Failure to correct a problem such as incompetence of an employee as incompetence of an employee may also result in vicarious may also result in vicarious liability.liability.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1818
Negligent Misrepresentation If someone relies on advice or If someone relies on advice or
information negligently provided information negligently provided by a specialist, and does so by a specialist, and does so reasonably to his or her detriment, reasonably to his or her detriment, a duty of care is breached.a duty of care is breached.
Informed consent or an Informed consent or an appropriate disclaimer may relieve appropriate disclaimer may relieve the specialist of liability.the specialist of liability.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
1919
Passing Off
If a reasonable member of the If a reasonable member of the public would be misled into public would be misled into believing one company’s goods or believing one company’s goods or services are those of another services are those of another selling a similar product, the selling a similar product, the victim may seek an injunction victim may seek an injunction and damages.and damages.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
2020
Defamation
The publication of a false statement about The publication of a false statement about someone either verbally or in writing which someone either verbally or in writing which damages their reputationdamages their reputation
Defences the defendant may raise areDefences the defendant may raise are
• truth of the statementtruth of the statement
• consent of the plaintiffconsent of the plaintiff
• absolute privilegeabsolute privilege
• qualified privilegequalified privilege
• fair commentfair comment
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
2121
Injurious Falsehood
Defaming a business, a product Defaming a business, a product or a property rather than a or a property rather than a personperson
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
2222
Nuisance
Interference with another Interference with another person’s use and enjoyment of person’s use and enjoyment of their landtheir land
Must be continuing and Must be continuing and unreasonableunreasonable
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
2323
Occupiers Liability Legislation Occupiers owe a duty of care to Occupiers owe a duty of care to
those entering on, or in the those entering on, or in the vicinity of, their premises.vicinity of, their premises.
Depending on jurisdiction, there Depending on jurisdiction, there may be a distinction between the may be a distinction between the duty owed to an invitee and a duty owed to an invitee and a licensee.licensee.
Copyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of TCopyright © 2007 by Nelson, a division of Thomson Canada Limitedhomson Canada Limited
2424
Preventing Negligence Claims Standard operating proceduresStandard operating procedures
Staff trainingStaff training
Adherence to regulationsAdherence to regulations
Record keepingRecord keeping
Use of waivers, disclaimers and releasesUse of waivers, disclaimers and releases
Insurance Insurance