Upload
michael-mclaughlin
View
227
Download
2
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Slide 12-2
Introduction
Investment spending by businesses is a key component of economic growth.
Expenditures on information technology were once expected to provide a bigger push to GDP expansion than they have. Why might investment spending and its effect on GDP be rather unpredictable?
Slide 12-3
Learning Objectives
Distinguish between saving and savings and explain how consumption and saving are related
Explain the key determinants of consumption and saving in the Keynesian model
Identify the primary determinants of planned investment
Slide 12-4
Learning Objectives
Describe how equilibrium national income is established in the Keynesian model
Evaluate why autonomous changes in total planned expenditures have a multiplier effect on equilibrium national income
Understand the relationship between total planned expenditures and the aggregate demand curve
Slide 12-5
Chapter Outline
Some Simplifying Assumptions in the Keynesian Model
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
Determinants of Investment
Consumption as a Function of Real GDP
Slide 12-6
Chapter Outline
Saving and Investment: Planned versus Actual
Keynesian Equilibrium with Government and the Foreign Sector Added
The Multiplier
Slide 12-7
Chapter Outline
The Multiplier Effect When the Price Level Can Change
The Multiplier Effect on the Equilibrium Level of Real GDP
Slide 12-8
Did You Know That...
Historically, investment spending has been the most volatile component of GDP?
Economist John Maynard Keynes put forth one of the first theories about the relationship among personal consumption, investment spending, and economic growth?
Slide 12-9
Keynes revisited
– Aggregate demand determines output (horizontal SRAS)
– We will examine the elements of aggregate demand (AD = C + I + G + X)
– Prices are fixed, so output is in real terms
Some Simplifying Assumptions in a Keynesian Model
Slide 12-10
Assumptions
– Businesses pay no indirect taxes (sales tax)
– Businesses distribute all profits to shareholders
– There is no depreciation
– The economy is closed
Some Simplifying Assumptions in a Keynesian Model
Slide 12-11
Definitions and relationships revisited– Consumption
• Spending on new goods and services out of a household’s current income
– Saving• The act of not consuming all of one’s income
– Savings• Accumulation of past saving; a stock variable
Some Simplifying Assumptions in a Keynesian Model
Slide 12-12
Some Simplifying Assumptions in a Keynesian Model
Disposable income equals consumption plus saving.
This accounting identity shows that each dollar of take-home income can either be spent or saved.
Slide 12-13
Investment– The spending by business on things
which can be used to produce goods and services in the future
Some Simplifying Assumptions in a Keynesian Model
Slide 12-14
Keynes was concerned with changes in AD.
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
AD = C + I + G + X
Slide 12-15
Keynes argued that saving and consumption decisions depend primarily on an individual’s real disposable income.
Consumption Function– The relationship between planned
consumption expenditures and their current level of real income
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
Slide 12-17
C = Yd
45o
Consumption function
The Consumption and Saving Functions
Real Disposable Income (Yd dollars per year)
Pla
nned
Rea
l Con
sum
ptio
n(C
, do
llars
per
yea
r)
12,000 24,000 36,0000
6,000
12,000
24,000
36,000
48,000
48,000 60,000
60,000
Break-even income
AB
C
DE
FG
H
I
J
K
Figure 12-1
Slide 12-18
The Consumption and Saving Functions
Real Disposable Income (Yd dollars per year)
Pla
nned
Rea
l Con
sum
ptio
n(C
, do
llars
per
yea
r)
12,000 24,000 36,0000
6,000
12,000
24,000
36,000
48,000
48,000 60,000
C = Yd60,000
Break-even income
Consumption function
AB
C
DE
FG
H
I
J
K
45o
Dissaving
Saving
Autonomousconsumption
(Equ
al v
ert
ical
dis
tanc
e)
Figure 12-1
Slide 12-19
The Consumptionand Saving Functions
0
6,000
-6,000
12,000
36,000 48,000 60,000
24,000
Real Disposable Income (Yd dollars per year)
Pla
nned
Rea
l Sav
ing
(S,
dolla
rs p
er y
ear)
CB
A
DE
F
GH
IJ
K
Figure 12-1
Slide 12-20
The Consumptionand Saving Functions
0
6,000
-6,000
12,000
36,000 48,000 60,000
24,000
Real Disposable Income (Yd dollars per year)
Pla
nned
Rea
l Sav
ing
(S,
dolla
rs p
er y
ear)
CB
A
DE
F
GH
IJ
K
Saving
Dissaving
Figure 12-1
Slide 12-21
Dissaving
– Negative saving; spending exceeds income
Autonomous Consumption
– The part of consumption that is independent of the level of disposable income
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
Slide 12-22
Average Propensity to Consume (APC)
– Consumption divided by disposable income
– The proportion of total disposable income that is consumed
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
APC =real consumption
real disposable income
Slide 12-23
Average Propensity to Save (APS)
– Saving divided by disposable income
– The proportion of total disposable income that is saved
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
APS =real saving
real disposable income
Slide 12-24
Average propensity to consume and average propensity to save must sum to 100 percent of total income.
Marginal propensity to consume and marginal propensity to save must sum to 100 percent of the change in income.
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
Slide 12-25
Example– Income = $54,000
– C = $49,200
– S = $4,800
What is the APC?
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
APC =$49,200
$54,000= .911
Slide 12-26
Example– Income increases by $6,000 to $60,000
– C = $54,000
– S = $6,000
What is the APC?
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
APC =$54,000
$60,000= .90
Slide 12-27
Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC)
– The ratio of the change in consumption to the change in disposable income
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
MPC =change in consumption
change in real disposable income
Slide 12-28
Marginal Propensity to Save (MPS)
– The ratio of the change in saving to the change in disposable income
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
MPS =change in saving
change in real disposable income
Slide 12-29
Causes of shifts in the consumption function– Non-income determinants of consumption
• Population• Wealth
Can you think of other non-income determinants of consumption?
Determinants of Planned Consumption and Planned Saving
Slide 12-30
International Example:Determinants of Investment Spending
Investment expenditures by Japanese businesses were depressed throughout the 1990’s, even though interest rates were close to zero.
The low cost of borrowing was not enough to offset the effect of poor prospects for growth in consumer spending.
Slide 12-31
International Example:Determinants of Investment Spending
Investment spending in Japan recovered only in 2002, as firms began to anticipate higher sales.
Firms began replacing old equipment, and in some cases actually expanded their productive capacity.
Slide 12-33
Determinants of Investment
Historically
– Investment has been more volatile than consumption
Why?
AD = C + I + G + X
Slide 12-35
Saving and Investment:Planned versus Actual
Equilibrium
– The intersection of the planned saving and planned investment schedules
No tendency for businesses to alter the rate of production or the level of employment
– There are no unplanned inventory changes
Slide 12-36
Planned and Actual Ratesof Saving and Investment
Real GDP per Year($ trillions)
7.0 8.0 9.00
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
10.0 11.0
I
Sav
ing
and
Inve
stm
ent
per
Yea
r ($
tril
lions
) S
Actual S = actual I
Unplanned inventory decrease = $400 billion per year
E
Figure 12-5
Slide 12-37
Planned and Actual Ratesof Saving and Investment
Real GDP per Year($ trillions)
7.0 8.0 9.00
1.2
1.6
2.0
2.4
10.0 11.0
E
S
I
Sav
ing
and
Inve
stm
ent
per
Yea
r ($
tril
lions
)
Actual S = actual I
Unplanned inventory decrease = $400 billion per year
Unplanned inventory increase = $400 billion per year
Planned investment = $1.600 trillion per year
Figure 12-5
Actual S = actual I
Slide 12-38
Government (G)—C + I + G– Federal, state, and local
• Does not include transfer payments• Is autonomous• Lump-sum taxes = G
Lump-Sum Tax– A tax that does not depend on income or
the circumstances of the taxpayer
Keynesian Equilibrium withGovernment and the Foreign Sector
Slide 12-39
The Foreign Sector—C + I + G + X
– Net exports (X) = exports - imports
– Autonomous
– Depends on the economic conditions in each country
Keynesian Equilibrium withGovernment and the Foreign Sector
Slide 12-42
The Equilibrium Levelof Real GDP
Observations– If C + I + G + X = Y
• Equilibrium
– If C + I + G + X > Y • Unplanned drop in inventories• Businesses increase output• Y returns to equilibrium
– If C + I + G + X < Y• Unplanned rise in inventories• Businesses cut output• Y returns to equilibrium
Slide 12-43
The Multiplier
Multiplier
– The ratio of the change in the equilibrium level of real national income to the change in autonomous expenditures
Slide 12-44
The Multiplier
Question
– How can $1.1 trillion of I generate $5.5 trillion of Y?
Answer
– The autonomous spending multiplier
Slide 12-45
The Multiplier ProcessAssumption: MPC = .8 or 4/5
Annual Increase Annual Increase Annual Increasein Real in Planned in Planned
National Income Consumption SavingRound ($ billions) ($ billions) ($ billions)
1 ($100 billion per year increase in I) 100.00 80.000 20.000
2 80.00 64.00 16.000
3 64.00 51.200 12.800
4 51.20 40.960 10.240
5 40.96 32.768 8.192
. . . .
. . . .
. . . .
All later rounds 163.84 131.072 32.768
Totals (C+I+G) 500.00 400.00 100.000
Table 12-3
Slide 12-47
The Multiplier
Examples
MPC =34
MPS =14
Mult. =1
1/4= 4
MPC =45
MPS =15
Mult. =1
1/5= 5
MPC =23
MPS =13
Mult. =1
1/3= 3
MPC =79
MPS =29
Mult. =1
9/2= 4.5
MPC =35
MPS =25
Mult. =1
5/2= 2.5
Slide 12-48
The Multiplier
Question
– How does the size of the MPC influence the value of the multiplier?
Answer
– The smaller the MPS, the larger the multiplier
– The larger the MPC, the larger the multiplier
Slide 12-49
The Multiplier
Measuring the change in equilibrium income from a change in autonomous spending
Change in equilibrium income = multiplier x change in level of real autonomous spending
Slide 12-50
The Multiplier
Question
– What does the multiplier tell us about the potential impact on the economy for a change in autonomous spending?
Slide 12-51
Example: A Double-Whammy Multiplier Effect
At the end of 2003, both investment spending and net exports increased for the U.S. economy.
This amounted to a significant increase in autonomous spending.
Due to the multiplier effect, the rate of overall GDP growth exceeded predictions.
Slide 12-52
The Multiplier Effect Whenthe Price Level Can Change
The multiplier effect on equilibrium real GDP will not be as great if part of the increase in nominal GDP occurs because of increases in the price level.
Slide 12-53
The Multiplier Effect onthe Equilibrium Level of Real GDP
0
Pric
e Le
vel
AD1
12.0
LRAS SRAS
120
AD2
With $100 billion increase in autonomous spending
Real GDP per Year($ trillions)Figure 12-7
Slide 12-54
The Multiplier Effect onthe Equilibrium Level of Real GDP
Real GDP per Year($ trillions)
12.00
Pric
e Le
vel
AD2
SRASLRAS
AD1
• With price adjustment the multiplier effect is less
• Real national income increases to $12.3 billion
With $100 billion increase in autonomous spending
125
12.3
120
12.5
Figure 12-7
Slide 12-55
The Multiplier Effect onthe Equilibrium Level of Real GDP
Real GDP per Year($ trillions)
Con
sum
ptio
n, I
nves
tmen
t,
Gov
ernm
ent
Pur
chas
es,
and
Net
Exp
orts
(C + I + G + X)100
E1
12
Figure 12-8
Slide 12-56
The Multiplier Effect onthe Equilibrium Level of Real GDP
Real GDP per Year($ trillions)
Con
sum
ptio
n, I
nves
tmen
t,
Gov
ernm
ent
Pur
chas
es,
and
Net
Exp
orts
(C + I + G + X)100
E1
(C + I + G + X)125
E2
10 12
Figure 12-8
Slide 12-57
The Multiplier Effect onthe Equilibrium Level of Real GDP
Real GDP per Year($ trillions)
Con
sum
ptio
n, I
nves
tmen
t,
Gov
ernm
ent
Pur
chas
es,
and
Net
Exp
orts
(C + I + G + X)100
12
E1
(C + I + G + X)125
• Assume prices increase to 125• C + I + G + X decreases• Equilibrium Y falls to $10 trillion
10
E2
Figure 12-8
Slide 12-58
Issues and Applications: “New Economy” or New Source of
Volatility?
Proponents of a theory of the “new economy” argued in the 1990’s that information technology expenditures would eliminate any economic downturns
– By making firms more productive
– By buoying investment spending
While IT expenditures contribute to growth of real GDP, they remain a source of volatility.
Slide 12-59
Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives
The difference between saving and savings and the relationship between consumption and saving is a flow over time while savings is a stock consumption plus saving equals disposable income.
The key determinant of consumption and saving in the Keynesian model is disposable income.
Slide 12-60
Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives
The primary determinants of planned investment are the interest rate, business expectations, productive technology, and business taxes.
Slide 12-61
Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives
In the Keynesian model equilibrium national income occurs where the C + I + G + X schedule crosses the 45 degree line.
Autonomous changes in total planned expenditure have a multiplier effect on equilibrium national income because an increase in autonomous expenditures increases income which increases consumption.
Slide 12-62
Summary Discussion of Learning Objectives
The relationship between total planned expenditures and the aggregate demand curve is inverse. An increase in the price level reduces planned expenditures.
– Real balance effect
– Interest rate effect
– Open economy effect