38
Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.

Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Chapter 11Clinical Application

Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.

Page 2: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Outer Ear Resonance

• Influence of pinna (p)• Influence of ear canal

(c) • Combine influence (t)• At 3000 Hz, the final

amplification (t) is 20 dB

Page 4: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Middle Ear Muscles

• Tensor tympani– Attached to malleus– Innervated by V, trigeminal nerve

• Stapedius– Attached to stapes– Innervated by VII, facial nerve

• Middle Ear Muscle Function:– Protect inner ear from excessive

sound levels • When ear exposed to sound levels

above 70 dB, the muscles contract, decreasing amount of energy transferred to inner ear

Page 5: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Hearing Loss

• Audibility• Identification• Signal to

noise ratio (SNR loss)

Page 6: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Audibility

Page 9: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Generate distortions

Page 10: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Traveling Waves

• Traveling wave• Basilar membrane• Traveling Wave info• Cochlear Traveling Wave

Page 11: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Central Auditory Path

Page 12: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Identification/Recognition

• Hearing loss affects the ability to correctly identify or label sound(s)– Vowels relatively easy– Consonants more difficulty to identify

• Place of production errors common• High frequency consonants (sibilants) extremely

difficult to identify

Page 13: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

QuickSin/BKBSIN SNR Loss

Page 14: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

UWO Plurals Test

• Test designed to test high frequency consonant detection, and assist with determining audibility.

Page 15: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Phoneme Perception Test

Page 16: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

CI

• CI offers one treatment option

• Phonak remote Dynamic FM best for classroom noise conditions

• Currently, addition of classroom amplification with CI with FM shows no benefit

Page 17: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Siemens Hearing Test (Free)

Page 18: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

iOS: iTalkAtMoog

Page 19: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Ling 6 (iOS)($1.99)

Page 20: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Cochlear HOPE Words Lite and HD

Page 21: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Cochlear HOPE App (Apple)

• Cochlear HOPE program• Adopted from Speech Sounds and Speech

Sounds Vowels• Listen to a word and matching their speech

production to what they heard. • Vocabulary development also facilitated• Each letter of alphabet has twenty different

flashcards• In some instances, letter may have two different

speech sounds (for example, “A” as in “way” or “A” as in “cat”)

Page 22: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Baldi (iOS App $4.99)

Page 23: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Auditory Verbal iPad ($3.99)

Page 24: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Hearing Aids

• Hearing aids

• FM remote microphones

• Phonak Dynamic FM best for background noise conditions

• Extended high frequency bandpass hearing aids (250-10,000 Hz)

• Non-linear frequency compression hearing aids

Page 25: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Phonak Dynamic FM Recievers

Page 26: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Non-linear Freq Compresion

Page 27: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Classroom Amplification

• Phonak Dynamic FM

• Phonak Dynamic FM in Classroom

Page 28: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Otitis MediaPrevalent among children birth to 6. At-risk children for OM:• Down Syndrome• Cleft Palate (cranial facial)• Treacher-Collins (cranial facial)• 2nd-hand smoke• Day-care• Low income (Inner city, Native Americans, etc.)• Bottle fed rather than breast fed• Allergies• Other infections (upper respiratory)• Immune suppression (HIV, AIDS, etc.)• Pacifier• Family history

Page 29: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

OME Tendencies

• Language impairments

• Poor phonetic processing

• At-risk for developmental delays in perceptual and phonemic awareness, thus leading to difficulties with higher level language functioning and reading

Page 30: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Specific Language Impairment• Characterized by difficulty with language that is not

caused by:

• known neurological,

• sensory,

• intellectual, or

• emotional deficit.

• Can affect the development of:

• vocabulary,

• grammar, and

• discourse skills,

• with evidence that certain morphemes may be especially difficult to acquire (including past tense, copula be, third person singular).

Page 31: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

SLI (cont.)

• Children with SLI may be intelligent and healthy in all regards except in the difficulty they have with language.

• They may in fact be extraordinarily bright and have high nonverbal IQs.

• Children with SLI usually learn to talk late

• child 3 or 4 years of age with limited vocabulary and short utterances.

• Likely to be the kinds of kids who are told by parents and teachers they are smart but unmotivated and they just need to try harder.

Page 32: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

SLI (cont.)

• Difficulty processing rapid acoustic speech cues (temporal processing problem)

• Difficulty identifying formant transitions, thus difficulty identifying phonemes

• Children of the Code

• Paula Tallal (Temporal spectral deficits)

Page 33: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Dyslexia

• Categorical perception difficulty

• Reading ability is significantly lower

• Difficulty perceiving consonant contrasts

• Confuse sounds phonetically similar

• May have deficits in processing the temporal order of acoustic information (difficulty identifying phonemes and judging the order in which the phonemes are heard)

• Difficulty segmenting, discriminating and identifying speech sounds

Page 34: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Types of Dyslexia• Developmental phonological dyslexia -

difficulty with nonword reading.– Changing the initial and middle letters of a word. – Examples are mana (mama) and aufo (auto).

• Developmental surface dyslexia - difficulty in reading irregular words. – 25% English words are irregular, which means that

they violate English spelling-to-sound word rule.– Examples: pretty, bowl, and sew.

Page 35: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Etiology of Dyslexia

• Heredity:– Family gene carries the disorder– Studies have shown that males are four times

more likely to have a reading disorder than a female;

– However, perhaps a male’s behavior contributes to this as it brings forth the disorder to a teacher’s attention more easily.

– Perhaps females can more readily compensate

Page 36: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Etiology of Dyslexia

• Environment: – Limited English vocabulary

• English as second language students. – Difficulty understanding phonemics. – Children of poverty – Children with parents with low reading levels – Students with speech or hearing impairments

Page 37: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Articulatory ProblemsCategorized into subgroups:

1. Those with speech perception difficulties

2. Those with normal speech perception• Subjects asked to identify words that contrasted phonemes /s/

and /S/. In this test, a subgroup of articulation-disordered children were unable to identify the test stimuli appropriately (seat vs. sheet).

• Subjects asked to identify words that contrasted the phonemes /s/ and /theta/, In words sick and thick, and none of the articulation-disordered children were able to identify these words appropriately whereas children without disorder could.

• Important to assess speech perception abilities prior to initiating articulation therapy

Rvachew S & Jamieson DG. (1989). Perception of voiceless fricatives by children with a functional articulation disorder. J Speech Hear Disord.; 54(2):193-208.

Page 38: Chapter 11 Clinical Application Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D

Reading Disorders

• Difficultly reading or understanding material within a reading.

• Most have problems with their phonemic (sound/symbol relationships) awareness development. – Have difficult time putting together letters to

make a sound.