ch14[1][1]

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    1/31

    ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIORS T E P H E N P. R O B B I N S

    W W W . P R E N H A L L . C O M / R O B B I N S

    T E N T H E D I T I O N

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    2/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 142

    AFTER STUDYING THIS CHAPTER,

    YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO:

    1. Define conflict.

    2. Differentiate between the traditional, human

    relations, and interactionist views of conflict.

    3. Contrast task, relationship, and process

    conflict.

    4. Outline the conflict process.

    5. Describe the five conflict-handling intentions.6. Contrast distributive and integrative

    bargaining.

    LEA

    R

    NI

    N

    G

    OB

    JEC

    TIV

    ES

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    3/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 143

    AFTER STUDYING THIS CHAPTER,

    YOU SHOULD BE ABLE TO:

    7. Identify the five steps in the negotiating

    process.

    8. Describe cultural differences in negotiations.

    LEA

    RN

    ING

    OB

    JEC

    TIVE

    S(contd)

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    4/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 144

    Transitions in Conflict Thought

    Causes:

    Poor communication

    Lack of openness

    Failure to respond toemployee needs

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    5/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 145

    Transitions in Conflict Thought (contd)

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    6/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 146

    Functional versus Dysfunctional Conflict

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    7/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 147

    Types of Conflict

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    8/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 148

    The Conflict Process

    E X H I B I T 14-1

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    9/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 149

    Stage I: Potential Opposition or Incompatibility

    Communication Semantic difficulties, misunderstandings, and noise

    Structure

    Size and specialization of jobs

    Jurisdictional clarity/ambiguity Member/goal incompatibility

    Leadership styles (close or participative)

    Reward systems (win-lose)

    Dependence/interdependence of groups Personal Variables

    Differing individual value systems

    Personality types

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    10/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1410

    Stage II: Cognition and Personalization

    Positive FeelingsNegative Emotions

    Conflict Definition

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    11/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1411

    Stage III: Intentions

    Cooperativeness:

    Attempting to satisfythe other partysconcerns.

    Assertiveness:

    Attempting to satisfyones own concerns.

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    12/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1412

    Stage III: Intentions (contd)

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    13/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1413

    Stage III: Intentions (contd)

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    14/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1414

    Dimensions of Conflict-Handling Intentions

    E X H I B I T 14-2

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    15/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1415

    Stage IV: Behavior

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    16/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1416

    Stage IV: Conflict Resolution Techniques

    Problem solving

    Superordinate goals

    Expansion of resources

    Avoidance

    Smoothing

    Compromise

    Authoritative command Altering the human variable

    Altering the structural variables

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    17/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1417

    Stage IV: Conflict Stimulation Techniques

    Communication

    Bringing in outsiders

    Restructuring the organization

    Appointing a devils advocate

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    18/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1418

    Conflict-Intensity Continuum

    E X H I B I T 14-3

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    19/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1419

    Stage V: Outcomes

    Functional Outcomes from Conflict

    Increased group performance

    Improved quality of decisions

    Stimulation of creativity and innovation

    Encouragement of interest and curiosity

    Provision of a medium for problem-solving

    Creation of an environment for self-evaluation andchange

    Creating Functional Conflict

    Reward dissent and punish conflict avoiders

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    20/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1420

    Stage V: Outcomes (contd)

    Dysfunctional Outcomes from Conflict

    Development of discontent

    Reduced group effectiveness

    Retarded communication

    Reduced group cohesiveness

    Infighting among group members overcomes groupgoals

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    21/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1421

    Negotiation

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    22/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1422

    Bargaining Strategies

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    23/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1423

    Distributive versus Integrative Bargaining

    E X H I B I T 14-5

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    24/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1424

    Staking Out the Bargaining Zone

    E X H I B I T 14-6

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    25/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1425

    The

    Negotiation

    Process

    E X H I B I T 14-7

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    26/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1426

    Issues in Negotiation

    The Role of Personality Traits in Negotiation

    Traits do not appear to have a significantly direct effecton the outcomes of either bargaining or negotiatingprocesses.

    Gender Differences in Negotiations

    Women negotiate no differently from men, althoughmen apparently negotiate slightly better outcomes.

    Men and women with similar power bases use thesame negotiating styles.

    Womens attitudes toward negotiation and theirsuccess as negotiators are less favorable than mens.

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    27/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1427

    Third-Party Negotiations

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    28/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1428

    Third-Party Negotiations (contd)

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    29/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1429

    Why U.S. Managers Might Have Trouble in Cross-

    Cultural Negotiations

    E X H I B I T 14-8

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    30/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. 1430

    E X H I B I T

    Conflict and Unit Performance

    14-9a

  • 8/11/2019 ch14[1][1]

    31/31

    2003 Prentice Hall Inc All rights reserved 14 31

    Conflict and Unit Performance (contd) E X H I B I T 14-9b