68
McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 10 10 Quality Control

ch10_ppt

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2007 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.

1010

Quality Control

10-2

Learning ObjectivesLearning Objectives

List and briefly explain the elements of the control process.

Explain how control charts are used to monitor a process, and the concepts that underlie their use.

Use and interpret control charts. Use run tests to check for nonrandomness

in process output. Assess process capability.

10-3

Phases of Quality AssurancePhases of Quality Assurance

Acceptancesampling

Processcontrol

Continuousimprovement

Inspection of lotsbefore/afterproduction

Inspection andcorrective

action duringproduction

Quality builtinto theprocess

The leastprogressive

The mostprogressive

Figure 10.1

10-4

InspectionInspection

How Much/How Often Where/When Centralized vs. On-site

Inputs Transformation Outputs

Acceptancesampling

Processcontrol

Acceptancesampling

Figure 10.2

10-5

Co

st

OptimalAmount of Inspection

Inspection CostsInspection Costs

Cost of inspection

Cost of passingdefectives

Total Cost

Figure 10.3

10-6

Where to Inspect in the ProcessWhere to Inspect in the Process

Raw materials and purchased parts

Finished products

Before a costly operation

Before an irreversible process

Before a covering process

10-7

Examples of Inspection PointsExamples of Inspection Points

Type ofbusiness

Inspectionpoints

Characteristics

Fast Food CashierCounter areaEating areaBuildingKitchen

AccuracyAppearance, productivityCleanlinessAppearanceHealth regulations

Hotel/motel Parking lotAccountingBuildingMain desk

Safe, well lightedAccuracy, timelinessAppearance, safetyWaiting times

Supermarket CashiersDeliveries

Accuracy, courtesyQuality, quantity

Table 10.1

10-8

Statistical Process Control: Statistical evaluation of the output of a process during production

Quality of Conformance:A product or service conforms to specifications

Statistical ControlStatistical Control

10-9

Control ChartControl Chart

Control Chart Purpose: to monitor process output to see

if it is random

A time ordered plot representative sample statistics obtained from an on going process (e.g. sample means)

Upper and lower control limits define the range of acceptable variation

10-10

Control ChartControl Chart

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15

UCL

LCL

Sample number

Mean

Out ofcontrol

Normal variationdue to chance

Abnormal variationdue to assignable sources

Abnormal variationdue to assignable sources

Figure 10.4

10-11

Statistical Process ControlStatistical Process Control

The essence of statistical process control is to assure that the output of a process is random so that future output will be random.

10-12

Statistical Process ControlStatistical Process Control

The Control Process Define Measure Compare Evaluate Correct Monitor results

10-13

Statistical Process ControlStatistical Process Control

Variations and Control Random variation: Natural variations in the

output of a process, created by countless minor factors

Assignable variation: A variation whose source can be identified

10-14

Sampling DistributionSampling Distribution

Samplingdistribution

Processdistribution

Mean

Figure 10.5

10-15

Normal DistributionNormal Distribution

Mean

95.44%

99.74%

Standard deviation

Figure 10.6

10-16

Control LimitsControl LimitsSamplingdistribution

Processdistribution

Mean

Lowercontrol

limit

Uppercontrol

limit

Figure 10.7

Control Limits are based on the Control Limits are based on the Normal CurveNormal Curve

x

0 1 2 3-3 -2 -1z

Standard deviation units or “z” units.

Standard deviation units or “z” units.

Control LimitsControl Limits

We establish the Upper Control Limits (UCL) and the Lower Control Limits (LCL) with plus or minus 3 standard deviations from some x-bar or mean value. Based on this we can expect 99.7% of our sample observations to fall within these limits.

xLCL UCL

99.7%

10-19

SPC ErrorsSPC Errors

Type I error Concluding a process is not in control

when it actually is.

Type II error Concluding a process is in control when it

is not.

10-20

Type I and Type II ErrorsType I and Type II Errors

In control Out of control

In control No Error Type I error

(producers risk)

Out of control

Type II Error

(consumers risk)

No error

Table 10.2

10-21

Type I ErrorType I Error

Mean

LCL UCL

/2 /2

Probabilityof Type I error

Figure 10.8

10-22

Observations from Sample Observations from Sample DistributionDistribution

Sample number

UCL

LCL

1 2 3 4

Figure 10.9

10-23

Control Charts for VariablesControl Charts for Variables

Mean control charts

Used to monitor the central tendency of a process.

X bar charts

Range control charts

Used to monitor the process dispersion

R charts

Variables generate data that are Variables generate data that are measuredmeasured..

10-24

Mean and Range ChartsMean and Range Charts

UCL

LCL

UCL

LCL

R-chart

x-Chart Detects shift

Does notdetect shift

Figure 10.10A

(process mean is shifting upward)

SamplingDistribution

10-25

x-Chart

UCL

Does notreveal increase

Mean and Range ChartsMean and Range Charts

UCL

LCL

LCL

R-chart Reveals increase

Figure 10.10B

(process variability is increasing)SamplingDistribution

10-26

Statistical Process Control ChartStatistical Process Control Chart

Exhibit S9.21

10-27

Control Chart Decision RulesControl Chart Decision Rules

Exhibit S9.22Source: Bertrand L. Hansen, Quality Control: Theory and Applications © 1963, p. 65. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.

10-28

Control Chart Decision RulesControl Chart Decision Rules

Exhibit S9.22 (cont’d)Source: Bertrand L. Hansen, Quality Control: Theory and Applications © 1963, p. 65. Reprinted by permission of Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ.

10-29

Changes in Mean and Variation Changes in Mean and Variation of Sample Mean Distributionsof Sample Mean Distributions

Exhibit S9.23

10-30

Exhibit S9.24

SPC Variablesfor Charts and RX

10-31

Control Chart for AttributesControl Chart for Attributes

p-Chart - Control chart used to monitor the proportion of defectives in a process

c-Chart - Control chart used to monitor the number of defects per unit

Attributes generate data that are Attributes generate data that are countedcounted..

10-32

Use of p-ChartsUse of p-Charts

When observations can be placed into two categories. Good or bad Pass or fail Operate or don’t operate

When the data consists of multiple samples of several observations each

Table 10.4

10-33

Use of c-ChartsUse of c-Charts

Use only when the number of occurrences per unit of measure can be counted; non-occurrences cannot be counted. Scratches, chips, dents, or errors per item Cracks or faults per unit of distance Breaks or Tears per unit of area Bacteria or pollutants per unit of volume Calls, complaints, failures per unit of time

Table 10.4

10-34

Use of Control ChartsUse of Control Charts

At what point in the process to use control charts

What size samples to take

What type of control chart to use

Variables

Attributes

10-35

Run TestsRun Tests

Run test – a test for randomness

Any sort of pattern in the data would suggest a non-random process

All points are within the control limits - the process may not be random

10-36

Nonrandom Patterns in Control Nonrandom Patterns in Control chartscharts

Trend Cycles Bias Mean shift Too much dispersion

10-37

Counting Above/Below Median Runs (7 runs)

Counting Up/Down Runs (8 runs)

U U D U D U D U U D

B A A B A B B B A A B

Figure 10.12

Figure 10.13

Counting RunsCounting Runs

10-38

NonRandom VariationNonRandom Variation

Managers should have response plans to investigate cause

May be false alarm (Type I error) May be assignable variation

10-39

Tolerances or specifications Range of acceptable values established by engineering

design or customer requirements

Process variability Natural variability in a process—measured by std devn of

process

Process capability Process variability relative to specification--- determination

of whether variability inherent in the output of process that is in control falls within the design specifications for the product output

Control Limits

Statistical limits that reflect the extent to which sample statistics like mean,range can vary due to randomness alone

Process CapabilityProcess Capability

10-40

Properties of a Normal Properties of a Normal DistributionDistribution

The distribution is bilaterally symmetrical. 68.3 percent of the distribution lies between

plus and minus one standard deviation from the mean.

95.4 percent of the distribution lies between plus and minus two standard deviations from the mean.

99.7 percent of the distribution lies between plus and minus three standard deviations from the mean.

10-41

Areas under the Normal Distribution Areas under the Normal Distribution Curve Corresponding to Different Curve Corresponding to Different

Numbers of Numbers of Standard Deviations from the MeanStandard Deviations from the Mean

Exhibit S9.19

10-42

Statistical Process Control Statistical Process Control (cont’d)(cont’d)

Process Capability (Study) Comparing inherent variation in a process to the

customer’s requirements (the specifications) to determine whether the process can produce what the customer requires Collect data on the process while the process is

operating without known causes of variation. Compare the customer’s requirements to the inherent

variation of the process. If the customer’s specifications fall within the three standard

deviations for the process, some predictable percentage of the time, the process will produce output that will not meet the customer’s needs.

10-43

Capability StudyCapability Study

Exhibit S9.20

10-44

Process CapabilityProcess CapabilityLowerSpecification

UpperSpecification

A. Process variability matches specifications

LowerSpecification

UpperSpecification

B. Process variability well within specifications

LowerSpecification

UpperSpecification

C. Process variability exceeds specifications

Figure 10.15

10-45

In case c,options are

Redesign process to achieve desired output

Use a new process

Ensure 100% inspection

Change specification

10-46

Process Capability RatioProcess Capability Ratio

Process capability ratio, Cp = specification widthprocess width

Upper specification – lower specification6

Cp =

3

X-UTLor

3

LTLXmin=C pk

If the process is centered use Cp

If the process is not centered use Cpk

10-47

Minimum process capability required=1. Good measure=1.33 For cp=1,DPM=2700 and for

cp=1.3330,DPM=30 For a Six sigma programme,Cp=2 –Process

variability is so small that design tolerance is six SD above and below the process mean

Cp=2 means Specification width=(6SD+6SD)/6SD

Fig 10.16

10-48

Process variability of 6 standard deviations refers to +/- 3 standard deviations of the process from mean

Eg length of time to perform a service is 10 mts and acceptable variation is +/-1 minute.If process SD=0.5 Mts

+/- 3 SD=1.5 min

Design tolerance=1 min

Hence not capable

10-49

The Cereal Box ExampleThe Cereal Box Example

We are the maker of this cereal. Consumer reports has just published an article that shows that we frequently have less than 15 ounces of cereal in a box.

Let’s assume that the government says that we must be within ± 5 percent of the weight advertised on the box.

Upper Tolerance Limit = 16 + .05(16) = 16.8 ounces Lower Tolerance Limit = 16 – .05(16) = 15.2 ounces We go out and buy 1,000 boxes of cereal and find that

they weight an average of 15.875 ounces with a standard deviation of .529 ounces.

10-50

Cereal Box Process CapabilityCereal Box Process Capability

Specification or Tolerance Limits Upper Spec = 16.8 oz Lower Spec = 15.2 oz

Observed Weight Mean = 15.875 oz Std Dev = .529 oz

3

;3

XUTLLTLXMinC pk

)529(.3

875.158.16;

)529(.3

2.15875.15MinC pk

5829.;4253.MinC pk

4253.pkC

10-51

What does a CWhat does a Cpkpk of .4253 mean? of .4253 mean?

An index that shows how well the units being produced fit within the specification limits.

This is a process that will produce a relatively high number of defects.

Many companies look for a Cpk of 1.3 or better… 6-Sigma company wants 2.0!

10-52

Limitations of Capability IndexesLimitations of Capability Indexes

1. Process may not be stable

2. Process output may not be normally distributed

3. Process not centered but Cp is used

10-53

Example 8Example 8

MachineStandard Deviation

Machine Capability Cp

A 0.13 0.78 0.80/0.78 = 1.03

B 0.08 0.48 0.80/0.48 = 1.67

C 0.16 0.96 0.80/0.96 = 0.83

Cp > 1.33 is desirableCp = 1.00 process is barely capableCp < 1.00 process is not capable

10-54

Processmean

Lowerspecification

Upperspecification

1350 ppm 1350 ppm

1.7 ppm 1.7 ppm

+/- 3 Sigma

+/- 6 Sigma

3 Sigma and 6 Sigma Quality3 Sigma and 6 Sigma Quality

10-55

Graph of the normal distribution, which underlies the statistical assumptions of the Six Sigma model. The Greek letter σ (sigma) marks the distance on the horizontal axis between the mean, µ, and the curve's inflection point. The greater this distance, the greater is the spread of values encountered. For the curve shown above, µ = 0 and σ = 1. The upper and lower specification limits (USL, LSL) are at a distance of 6σ from the mean. Because of the properties of the normal distribution, values lying that far away from the mean are extremely unlikely. Even if the mean were to move right or left by 1.5σ at some point in the future (1.5 sigma shift), there is still a good safety cushion. This is why Six Sigma aims to have processes where the mean is at least 6σ away from the nearest specification limit.

10-56

10-57

The Goal of Six SigmaThe Goal of Six Sigma

Exhibit S9.29

10-58

Impact of 1.5σ Shift on 3σ ProcessImpact of 1.5σ Shift on 3σ Process

Exhibit S9.30A

10-59

Impact of 1.5σ Shift on 6σ ProcessImpact of 1.5σ Shift on 6σ Process

Exhibit S9.30B

10-60

Defect Rates for Different Levels of Sigma Defect Rates for Different Levels of Sigma (σ) (σ)

Assuming a 1.5 Shift in Actual Mean from Assuming a 1.5 Shift in Actual Mean from Design MeanDesign Mean

Exhibit S9.31

10-61

Improving Process CapabilityImproving Process Capability

Simplify Standardize Mistake-proof Upgrade equipment Automate

10-62

Taguchi Loss FunctionTaguchi Loss Function

Cost

TargetLowerspec

Upperspec

Traditionalcost function

Taguchicost function

Figure 10.17

10-63

Advanced Quality ToolsAdvanced Quality Tools

Affinity diagrams

Used to structure and clarify ideas by organizing them according to their affinity, or similarity, to each other.

Interrelationship digraph

Helps to sort out cause-and-effect relationships when there are a large number of interrelated issues that need to be better understood.

10-64

Affinity Affinity Diagram of Diagram of

Team Learning Team Learning ObjectivesObjectives Exhibit S9.9

10-65

Relations Diagram for Late Hospital Relations Diagram for Late Hospital DischargeDischarge

Exhibit S9.10

10-66

Advanced Quality Tools Advanced Quality Tools (cont’d)(cont’d)

Tree diagram Helps determine ways to meet objectives by

breaking down a main goal into subgoals and actions and identify the strategy to be taken.

Matrix diagram Used to organize information that can be

compared on a variety of characteristics in order to make a comparison, selection, or choice.

Arranges elements of a problem or event in rows and columns on a chart that shows relationships among each pair of elements.

10-67

Basic Structure of a Tree DiagramBasic Structure of a Tree Diagram

Exhibit S9.11

10-68

Matrix DiagramMatrix Diagram

Exhibit S9.12