62
Chapter 10 Plastics Parts Manufacturing Part-2

Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

IENG302

Citation preview

Page 1: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Chapter 10

Plastics Parts Manufacturing Part-2

Page 2: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Plastic Parts Manufacturing Processes

Injection Molding

Compression Molding

Blow Molding

Extrusion

Thermoforming

Page 3: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding Most Common Process – used mainly for

thermoplastics Major Advantages:

Complex shapes (shape control) Dimensional accuracy High production rates possible Cost effective for high volume parts

Major Disadvantage: Mold costs are high

Page 4: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding1. Most common process

2. Makes formed parts from polymer materials

3. Material is fed through barrel that houses a screw and heaters

4. Rotating screw advances material toward tip into a pressure chamber

5. Heaters used to heat and soften material

6. Injects material into a mold

7. Solidifies into shape of cavity

8. Mold is opened – parts removed by ejection pins

Page 5: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding Design Considerations

Wall design- Uniformity in thickness is important

Ribs- Follow design guidelines to avoid sink marks

Radii- Allow for minimum radii

Inside corner – 25% of wall thickness Outside corner – 125 % of wall thickness

Taper and draft angles- Facilitates part removal

Inserts

- Avoid sharp corners Undercuts

- Adds complexity and cost to injection mold

Page 6: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 7: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 8: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 9: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 10: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 11: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 12: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 13: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 14: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 15: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding

Page 16: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Moldflow® Simulation Software

Page 17: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding Defects: Incomplete fill

Page 18: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Molding Defects: Sink marks

Page 19: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Cost Estimating

Cost components of an injection-molded part

Material cost

Setup cost

Molding cost

Labor cost

Page 20: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Material Cost:

The first step in determining the material cost is the estimation of volume of the material the part will use, i.e. in cubic inches of the material

The next step is calculate the weight of the material.

Weight = Volume * Density of the material

The material cost is the product of part weight adjusted for yield and scrap by cost per lb of the material.

Setup Cost:

The unit setup cost of the material is the total setup cost divided by total number of parts.

Page 21: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Molding Cost:

Depends on the machine size and estimated cycle time.

The hourly machine rate includes overhead allocation

Labor Cost:

The labor cost is determined from the operator rate and the unit time to produce a part.

Page 22: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC
Page 23: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC
Page 24: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC
Page 25: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Molding Cost: From table 10.2, the recommended machine size is 700 tons and the average hourly machine rate is $100/hr. From Table 10.3 the cycle time is 60 sec or 60 shots per hour so the molding cost is:

Material weight in 4 cavities2.25 lb/part * 4 parts = 9.0 lb = 144 oz

Allowing for 10% scrap you need to mold 2,222 parts: (2,222 parts / 4 parts/shot) / (60 shots/hr) = 9.26 hours

From table 10.2 for 144 oz part the machine size = 700 ton and the average machine rate = $100, therefore:Molding cost = ($100/hr * 9.26 hours) / 2,000 parts = $0.463part = $0.46/part

Or - Molding cost = $100/hour * 60 sec/3600 sec = $1.667/molding cycle

Molding cost per part = [($1.667/cycle)/(4 parts/cycle)] * 1/(1-.1) = $.463

Page 26: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Labor Cost:

Labor cost = ($24/hr * 9.26 hours) / 2,000 parts = $0.111/part = $0.11/part

Total unit cost = $6.75 + $0.20+ $0.46 + $0.11 = $7.52

Total production time = 9.26 hours + 2 hour setup = 11.26 hours

10.6.1 Page 206-207. Two errors in book not taking into account scrap for molding cost ($.04) and labor cost ($.01). The book has total cost as $7.47. Differential 0.05

Page 27: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

PROBLEM 8

Given a 25 in3 injection molded plastic part with a wall thickness of 0.15 in. Material cost is $2.00/lb and the specific gravity is 1.4. Material scrap rate is 20%. Yield is 80%. The setup cost is $200/hr and the setup time is 1 hour. Labor rate is $20/hr. The lot size is 1000 parts using a 4 cavity mold.

Determine the unit cost.

Part cost = material cost + set-up cost + molding cost + labor cost

Page 28: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Material Cost:

Part material weight = 25 in3 * 1.4 * 0.036 lb/in3

= 1.26 lb

Part weight adjusted for yield & scrap= 1.26/(.8)*(1/(1-.2)) = 1.969 lb

Material cost (including yield & scrap adjustments)= 1.969 lb * $2.00/lb = $3.94/part

Page 29: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Molding Cost:

Material weight in 4 cavities1.969 lb/part * 4 parts = 7.88 lb = 126.08 oz

From Table 10.2: machine size is 700 tonsAverage machine rate = $100/hr

From Table 10.3: cycle time = 38 sec (t = 0.15 in) or 95 shots/hr

Allowing for 20% scrap you need to mold 1250 parts with a 4 cavity mold: (1250 parts / 4 parts/shot) / (95 shots/hr) = 3.3 hours

Molding cost = ($100/hr * 3.3 hours)/1000 parts = $0.33/part

Page 30: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Set-Up Cost:

Unit set-up cost = ($200*1)/1000 = $0.20/part

Labor Cost:

Labor cost = ($20/hr * 3.3 hours) / 1000 parts = $0.066/part = $0.07/part

Total unit cost = $3.94 + $0.20+ $0.33 + $0.07 = $4.54

Total production time = 3.3 hours + 1 hour setup = 4.3 hours

Page 31: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Compression Molding Used mainly for thermosetting plastics Major advantages:

Low tendency of distortion and warpage High degree of part density

The process: Plastic (powder or tablet) placed in heated cavity Mold closed under pressure May be heated by steam of electric heating coils Binding agent could be added – reinforcement

Page 32: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Compression Molding

Page 33: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Compression Molding

Page 34: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC
Page 35: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Compression Molding

Page 36: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Compression Molding

Page 37: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Extrusion

Continuous process for uniform cross sections

Applicable to both sheet or profile extrusions

Thermoplastic material is extruded through a die

Tooling is inexpensive

Two or more polymers can be joined through co-extrusion

Page 38: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Extrusion

Page 39: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Extrusion

Page 40: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Extrusion

Page 41: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Extrusion

Page 42: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Extrusion

Page 43: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Extrusion

Page 44: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Blow Molding

Preferred process for making hollow shapes such as containers, bottles, automobile fuel tanks, etc.

Compare to injection molding: Dimensional tolerances are less Molds usually cheaper More easily removed from molds

Processes can generally be characterized as: Injection blow molding Extrusion blow molding

Can require some post-processing

Page 45: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Blow Molding

The process:Place heat softened plastic in a 2-piece tube

die moldClose end of mold Inflate with compressed air – plastic takes

shape of moldOpen mold and eject product

Page 46: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Injection Blow Molding

Page 47: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Extrusion Blow Molding

Page 48: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Blow Molding

Page 49: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Thermoforming

Process uses pre-manufactured thermoplastic sheet that is heated to a forming temperature

Continuous or cut sheet

Forming - specific shape with vacuum or pressure

Low mold costs

Product design limitations, i.e. deep draw or a small radius may overstretch the sheet

Scrap can be recycled

Page 50: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Thermoforming Industry

Total North America both thin and thick is over 10 billion dollars

Over 150 thin gauge thermoformers (60% proprietary products)

Over 12 thin gauge each over $100M Over 250 thick gauge thermoformers (NA) Thick gauge – mostly custom formers Thick gauge three has sales over $100M

Page 51: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Basic Thermoforming Products

Thin gauge – less than .06 inches: disposable cups, containers, trays, other products for food, medical, etc. Basically applications – rigid and semi-rigid disposable packaging. (Disposable)

Thick gauge – greater than .12 inches: usually already cut to final dimensions. Parts used as cosmetic surfaces on permanent structures – autos, refrigerators, shower enclosures, electrical and electronic equipment. (Permanent)

Page 52: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Thin-Gauge Thermoforming

Most common method high-volume, continuous process – a plastic sheet is fed from a roll or an extruder into set of indexing chains (pins or spikes)

Transport the plastic through an oven for heating to forming temperature. Indexes into a form station for a mating mold and pressure-box close onto mold with pressurized air to form plastic to detailed shape of the mold

Page 53: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Thin-Gauge Thermoforming

After a short form cycle – a burst of reverse air pressure from vacuum side of mold as forming tool opens (air-inject).

Stripper plate – may also be utilized on the mold for ejection of more detailed parts.

Sheet containing the formed parts indexes into a separate trim press for part trimming

Trimmed material – recycled

Page 54: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Thermoforming

Page 55: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Thermoforming

Page 56: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Thermoforming

Page 57: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Thermoforming

Page 58: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Thermoforming

Page 59: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Heavy Gauge Thermoforming

Same basic process as Thin Guage Drape the heated sheet over a mold Typically use vacuum only to form Some use 2 halves of mating form tooling and

include air pressure to help form Ofter need hand-worked after forming for

trimming to final shape or additional operations: drilling, cutting, finishing, etc.

Page 60: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Plastic Reinforcing and Composites

Used to significantly increase the mechanical properties of plastic parts (stiffness, toughness, tensile/compressive strength, resistance to cracking, fatigue, impact, abrasion.

Reinforced plastics have short, randomly distributed fibers in the polymer matrix

Composites are constructed of unbroken fiber strands or matsComposites have excellent structural and load bearing properties

Thermosets are commonly used

Page 61: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

Homework 6 due Tuesday, February 16

Two problems

What is material, setup, mold, labor and total unit cost and what is the total production time for A and B below?

Problem 1: In problem 8, change cost of material to $2.75/lb, specific gravity from 1.4 to 1.7, the mold has 5 cavities, the part has a maximum wall thickness of .10 in, the setup cost is $240/hr and the labor rate is $16/hr, yield is 75%, material scrap rate is 10%, the setup time is 2.5 hours and the lot size is 8,100 parts.

Page 62: Ch 10 Plastics Mfg Lecture 2 KC

PROBLEM 2

Problem 8, change cost of plastic from $2.00 to $3.00 and change wall thickness to max .19 in, density is .06 lb/in3 and the material scrap rate is 20%, yield is 70%, mold has 3 cavities and using 80% new material and 20% of reground scrap material (cost of material/lb changes), what is the unit cost of each part? Assume the cost to regrind scrap parts is $0.30/lb. Lot size = 2,000 parts. Setup cost = $300 and takes 3 hours. Labor cost = $20/hr.

Determine the unit cost and the total production time.

Part cost = material cost + set-up cost + molding cost + labor cost