20
CH. 10: LAUNCHING THE NEW SHIP OF STATE

Ch. 10: Launching the New Ship of State

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Ch. 10: Launching the New Ship of State. Growing Pains 1789. Population doubling every 25 yrs. 90% rural 5% east of Appalachians. The First Administration. GW (1789-1797). “man of the people?” Cabinet members ?. Hamilton’s Controversial Fiscal Program. Tariffs of 1789: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

CH. 10: LAUNCHING THE NEW SHIP OF STATE

Page 2: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Growing Pains 1789

• Population doubling every 25 yrs.

• 90% rural• 5% east of Appalachians

Page 3: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

THE FIRST ADMINISTRATION

Page 4: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

GW (1789-1797)

1. “man of the people?”

2. Cabinet members?

Page 5: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State
Page 6: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Hamilton’s Controversial Fiscal Program

1. Tariffs of 1789:Focus - raise revenue for the gov’t, not protect Amer. Merchants

2. Hamilton’s Plana. Assumption –

i. feds repay states debt w/bonds

ii. Est. credit for fed. Gov’t abroad

b. Bank of the United States Managed by Treasury Dept.

c. TJ argues unconstitutional expansion of power

3. Complete Successforeign investments and domestic capital increases

Page 7: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State
Page 8: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

HBO’SHAMILTON V. TJ

CLIP

Page 9: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Hamilton vs. TJ re: the Constitution

Federalist

Implied powers

Anti-federalist

Explicit powers

Page 10: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State
Page 11: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Foreign Policy (1793) aka “self interest”

1. French Rev. and war Between France and GB

2. What should the US do?

3. Feds: support GB; trade

4. Anti-feds: support Fr; less dependent on GB

5. GW says Neutrality! = Sell, sell, sell!

&

Page 12: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Domestic Crisis (1794)

1. Whiskey Rebelliona. Excise tax?

b. tax collectors harassed

c. Three Rebels killed

d. GW sends troops out to Pa; puts rebels down

2. Moral of story?

a. don’t mess w/Fed govt => Tested powers of new

fed gov’t and Feds win

Page 13: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Jay’s and Pinckney’s Treaties1. Jay’s Treaty (1794)

a. GB to leave by 1796

b. Pay damages for seizures of American ships

c. Pay debt to GB pre-Rev mostly by southerners

Page 14: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Jay’s and Pinckney’s Treaties

Pinckney’s Treaty a. Southern boundary @31

parallel

b. Ms. River open for US

trade

Collectively, LTC of treaties?

Sovereignty West of Appalachian Mts. And ports from Atlantic to Miss. Valley open.

Page 15: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

I. GW Farewell Address

• doc

Page 16: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State
Page 18: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Adam’s X, Y, Z Affair1. Relations between US and

France worsen thanks to US support of Jay’s Treaty; French confiscate US vessels and cargo.

2. US Delegates turned away; French wanted bribes and loans

3. Adams releases messages with names of French officials as X, Y, and Z.

4. Adams stands his ground; builds a navy for defense

5. “Quasi-war” between the two

6. Adams approval rating soars; by Anti-feds as well!

Page 19: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Alien & Sedition Acts (1798)

1. Limits free speech and liberties of foreigners

2. Naturalization Act increases residence requirements from 5 to 14 years

3. Sedition Act: fines/imprisonment for anyone convicted of speaking against gov’t

4. To be used against Republicans

5. Disagreement = treason

Page 20: Ch. 10:  Launching the New Ship of State

Alien & Sedition Acts (1798)

6. Virginia and Kentucky Resolutionsa. states have fundamental rights that the federal gov’t

cannot abridge (diminish)

b. States can nullify federal laws that they judge to be unconstitutional

c. Federalists believed since the people, not the states, wrote the constitution; therefore, the Supreme Court should be the only branch to deem laws unconstitutional