Upload
sherilyn-bishop
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CPWF aims to: increase productivity of water for food & livelihoods in a manner that is environmentally sustainable & socially acceptable
15 years in 3 x 5-year phases – Phase 1 2004-8; Phase 2 2009-13; Phase 3 ?
CGIAR Science Council Commentary on Phase 2 Plan - 20 April 2008
“10 years, consistent with “Lessons Learnt on CPs” (Sep 2007)”
“there may be value in extending this CP beyond 2 phases, but that should not beanticipated at this stage”
CPWF intends that there will be a Phase 3
Projects
• 33 “1st call” projects in first round, 3-5 years, $1-2 million from CPWF, starting 2004
• 8 “2nd call” projects started early 2008
• 4 Basin projects started in 2005 – Volta, Mekong, Sao Francisco, Karkeh
• 6 Basin projects started early 2008 incl. Limpopo
• 12 Small Grant projects (12-18 mths)
The CPWF Water-Food System
Scales
Global
Basin
SystemCrop Water Productivity
Theme 1 (IRRI)
People & catchments
Theme 2 (CIAT)
Aquatic ecosystems
Theme 3 (ICLARM)
Integrated river basin managementTheme 4 (IWMI)
Global and national policies and institutionsTheme 5 (IFPRI)
SCALES 5 THEMES
LIZ Bas Bouman
Doug White
Nancy Johnson
Sophie Nguyen-KhoaMartin van BrakelWORLD FISH/IWMI
Flip WesterC.T. HoanhFrancis Gichuki
Mark Svendsen
Annette Huber-lee
CGIAR Future Harvest Centers
NARES
Advanced Research Institutes
International River Basin Organizations
International NGOs
ARC YRCCAREO
16 Consortium Partners – Steering Cte
Present (2006) estimates of donor contributions 2003 - 2008 USD millions
Present estimate
United Kingdom 17.0 World Bank 13.7 France 6.2 Netherlands 5.4 Switzerland 5.4 European Commission (pending final approval)5.4 Germany 2.7 Norway 2.6 Denmark 2.2 IFAD 0.9 Sweden 0.6 USDA 0.1
Total 62.2
Mostly from Europe, similar funding anticipated for Phase 2
CPWF aims to:CPWF aims to: increase productivity of water for increase productivity of water for foodfood & & livelihoodslivelihoods in a manner that is in a manner that is environmentally sustainable,environmentally sustainable, socially acceptable socially acceptable & alleviates & alleviates poverty for all disadvantaged poverty for all disadvantaged groupsgroups
Phase 2 2009 – 2013Qualifiers 1. Liz’s understanding as of 14 June 2009; 2. work in progress
CPWF Phase 2 – main changes• Governance – more independent of CGIAR
- small board – 9 – first meeting Sept 08
- 5 independents (selected by CSC);
- independent chair (George Rothschild)
- 1 CG alliance rep. (IFPRI – Mark Rosegrant)
- 1 IWMI rep (accountable for CPWF – Colin Chartres)
- 1 rep non-CGIAR CSC members
- CPWF program director
• Implementation
- program director (Alain Vidal replaces Jonathan Woolley)
- science director (Larry Harrington)
- impact director (Boru Douthwaite)
- assistant director (Sophie Nguyen-Khoa)
- program administrator (Pamela George)
CPWF Phase 2 – main changes• More focussed, targetted
- 6 Basins (Limpopo, Nile, Volta, Ganges, Mekong, Andean “system”)
- 6 Research topics (part time topic leaders?)
- 1-2 “development challenges” per Basin, specific parts of Basin, stakeholder consultation for selecting the challenges (related to the topics – “chicken & egg”)……
• Basin driven research agenda
- “Basin Project” – comprised of 3-5 “projects”
- Basin advisory committee
- Basin Impact leader
- Basin Challenge leader (may come from sub-projects?)
- commissioned & competitively selected projects
The CPWF Water-Food System
Scales
Global
Basin
SystemCrop Water Productivity
Theme 1 (IRRI)
People & catchments
Theme 2 (CIAT)
Aquatic ecosystems
Theme 3 (ICLARM)
Integrated river basin managementTheme 4 (IWMI)
Global and national policies and institutionsTheme 5 (IFPRI)
SCALES 5 THEMES
Liz Humphreys
Doug White Sophie Nguyen-Khoa
C.T. Hoanh
Annette Huber-lee
Transition – oversighting completion of Phase 1 projectsCPMT – Sophie Nguyen-Khoa; Phase 1 Project Supervisors – former TLs 10%
Focusing the strategy in phase 2
Focusing on the technical content found to be most promising in phase 1 – plus some new areas
Focusing even more on research that will begin development impact within the 15 year CPWF time frame
All research is interdisciplinary, includes cross-scale analysis and focuses on resilience
Phase 2: 2009-2013; intended Phase 3 to 2018
Focusing the strategy in Phase 2
CPWF as the platform for partners to contribute their specialist expertise
Seeking to strengthen research for development networks in water & food in each basin that will continue functioning after CPWF finishes in 2018 (part of the “exit” strategy)
With expected minimum budget of USD 60 million can handle 1 challenge per basin; aiming for $90 and 2 challenges
Priority development challenges in each basin
Ganges delta 1. Integrated agriculture & aquaculture (2. Integrated management of groundwater)
Mekong (especially the “3S” border area Laos-Cambodia-Vietnam) Basin Impact Leader Kim Geheb
1. Multiple use of reservoirs(2. Sustainable management of upland agricultural water)
Nile (especially Ethiopian highlands) 1. A landscape approach to rainwater management(2. Multiple uses of agricultural wastewater in the Delta)
First challenges (at least 3) to be contracted in 2009
Priority development challenges in each basin
Volta (Burkina Faso/northern Ghana) Small reservoirs & rainwater management
Andes (7 small basins) 1. Benefit-sharing mechanisms to improve water productivity &
reduce water-related conflict(2. Strategies for Andean communities to adapt to global
change
Limpopo (Mozambique, Zimbabwe, South Africa) Small reservoirs & rainwater management
First challenges (at least 3) to be contracted in 2009
Flexible cross-basin topic working groups (TWG)in support of basin research
Increasing rainwater productivity
Multi-purpose water systems www.waterandfood.org
Water benefit sharing
Global drivers of change
Learning to innovate
Participation and gender
(There will be periodic additions, mergers and deletions)
TWG members from Basin project teams working on elements of the Topic
Phase 2 Topic Working groups
•Foster cross-basin learning and sharing•Synthesize experiences gained in different basins•Strengthen the science•Apply lessons learned to further improve research in basins•Provide capacity for cross-scale analysis within basins
Iterative learning process