IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO

STATE EX REL ROBERT HARSH CASE NO. ^^p^a o093PETITIONER

vs.

WARDEN C.C.I.RESPONDENT

MOTION FOR DECLARATORY JUDGMENT`S & INJUNCTIVE RELIEF IN ANY COURTOF RECOt'8D WITH CONTROVERSY PURSUANT TO ;OHIO RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE ;R, 52,! R, 57,/ R,65 (A)(B)(2) & OHIO REVISEDCODES R.C. 2721.02 (facts Tindings and conclusion of law request)R.C. 2721.03 UNDER U.S. CONST 5TH AND 14TH U.S.C.AAND OHIO CONST, ART I S3,9,16,20, OHIO CONST ART II SECTS,28 DECLARE ACTIONS OF B.M.V. OF OHIO ANDSTATUES HEREIN UNCONSTITUTIONAL, VOID FOR VAGUENESS, OVERBROAD & EXPOST FACTO, RETROACTIVE DOCTRINE.void R.C. 2941.1413 voidR.C.2941.1416 void R.C4511.19 RES IPSA LOQUITOR DOCTRINE

MEMORANDUM OF LA WAND AFFIDA VITIN SUPPORT

NOW COMES ROBERT HARSH INPROPRIA PERSONA AND WITHOUT COUNSEL AND

i I O V E S T u 7 C "nT T D7' r i ' / 1 D 71 L'/T A D A'TT/1DV TT TTl/^T .TL'ATTCY .1 A TTl T) D L`T T A fTAT A T) [T TAT TT T.ATl^TTTTi.'^. v vai< < vaV a^c:..ala1v11 v1V 1 3 Vt/v1v11.:1V 1 0 t11VL 1 1lL'.L11V111Vl1R1 11VJ V1V 1.11 V G

RELIEF. CERTIFING THESE THREE STATUESAND ACTIONS OF THE BUREAU OF MOTOR

VEHICLES ARE DECLARED UNCONSTITUIO_NAL ; ART I,II SECTION 10, 28 NO STATE SHALL

PASSANYEX POST FACTO LAW OR RETROACTIVE LAWAS THESE STATUES PLAINLYARE IN

VIOLATION OF...

^

UNITED STATE'S OFAMERICA

E©F'EU 2 12012

Ct.tidY, UF (MURTSO?tt&McCOUH" OF OHIO

CFDLL©down=

CLERK OF COURTSUPREME COURT OF OHIO

®aPiac ct7q I+4^^?`^^i^'C^t6 C'bmUC^6ll.?€Yi( ^e^^ KlOtd+l^ MR t3^ 5

a• O.R.C. 2941.1416 SPECIFICATION CONCERNING..3PRIOR MISDEMEANORS SEE

(I£ATZ, GIANNELLI AND BALDWIN 2008 SECTION 117 .3)

THIS STATUE AS WELL IS DEFINATELY UNCONSTITUTIONAL,OVERBROAD AND

VOI FOR VAGUENESS DOCTRINE DOES NOT GIVE FAIR NOTICE OF THE CONDUCT

WHICH IS PROHIBITED BY LAW AND ENCOURAGES ARBITRARY AND\OR

DISCIRMINATORY ENFORCEMENT AND PUNISHMENT.

SUBSEQUENTLY THIS LAW GOES BACK RETROACTIVELY 20 YEARS ON A

CITZENS DRIVING RECORD TO PUNISH FOR PAST CONDUCT DOES THIS LAW MEAN

PRIORS WHICH ARE FELONYS,OR MISDEMEANORS, ?

j3, SUBSEQUENTLY THIS LAW DOES NOT STATE IT IS FOR JUVENILES AS BUTLER

COUNTY CORRUPT GOVERMENT OFFICIALS HAVE DETERMINED. SEE.. STATE OF

OHIO V. ROBERT HARSH CASE NO. CR 2006-03-0500 CORRUPTION AND IGNORANCE

OF THE LAW AT ITS WORST... THEREFOREBUTLER COUNTY SEEMS TO THINK THIS LA W

I,S.,SPECIFICALLYFOR JUVENILES AND DOES NOT PERTAIN TO AIJDULTS. WHEN COMMON

SENSE WOULD TELL YOU JUVENILE'S CANNOT HAVE BEENDRIVING FOR THE PAST 20

YEARS WHEREFORE THIS MAKES NO SENSE WHATSOEVER.AGAINPROVING

CORRUPTIONAND IGNORANCE OF THE LAW..

Cl ACCORDINGLY THIS PENAL STATUE IS VOID FOR VAGUENESS,

UNCONSTITUTIONAL UNLAWFUL, UNCOMPREHENDABLE AND ALSO VIOLATES EXPnCT aTiAC Tl^l TAIC UEN A_•T, ^'TATvTE IS DEFIi^TATEiLY PROi1IBITED...

O.R.C 45.11.19 DRIVING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL OR

DRUGS:TEST:PRESUMPTIONS:PENALTIES:IlVIMUNITY FOR THOSE WITHDRAWLING

BLOOD. ( KATZ. GIANNELLI'AND BALDWIN 451119)

THIS PENAL STATUE IS OVERLY BROAD, VOID FOR VAGUENESS DOCTRINEAND

VIOLATES IST,4TH,5TH,AND 14THAM^NDMENTS OF U.S CONSTITUTIONAND ARTICLE

I SECTION 3,11 OF THE OHIO' CONSTI y'UTION.

THERE IS NO WAY THE AVERAGE PERSON KNOWS WHEN HIS CONDUCT VIOLATES

THIS PENAL STATUE,THEREFORE IT IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. YOU HAVE TO BE A

TRAINED PROFESSIONAL TO UNDERSTAND EXACTLY AS TO WHEN YOU ARE

VIOLATING THIS LAW. THIS LAW ALLOWS YOU TO VIOLATE IT UPTO A CERTAIN POINT

WHICH IS UNATAINABLE KNOWLEDGE TO THE AVERAGE PERSON. in/huv A ?`rsors

REACHED A CER TAIN POINT?? YOU CANNOT DO IT...A CITIZEN CANNOT SAY WELL IBETTER P ULL OVERAND DRAW MYBLOOD OR FIND A BREATIIALIZER AT THE LOCALPOLICE STATION CANHE????????????? NO HE/SHE CANNOT.. UNCONSTITUIONAL..

D. R.C. 2941.1416 SPECIFICATION CONCERNING PRIOR MISDEMEANORS O.V.IOFFENSE. AGAINEXPOST FACTO AND RETROACTIVE CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS...PL US HIGHLY UNCOMPREHENABLE TO O.A. G. AND STATE AND FEDERAL .IUDGES..I THINKIT,IT WHAT IT SAYS,IT IS FOR.. BUT I MUST BE completely IGNORANT I THINK THIS LAWSTATE'S IT IS PUNISHMENT FOR YOUR PRIOR MISDEMEANOR D. UZ'S OR O. V.I'S WHAT YOUTHE AVERAGE CITIZEN COMMITTED YEARS PRIOR AND HAVE ALREADYBEEN PUNISHEDFOR..

DEAR HIGHJUDGES OF THE LAND PLEASE EXPLAINTO ME THIS LA WAND WHAT ITVIOLATES.... OBVIOUSLYTHIS LAW DID NOT CARRYENOUGHTIME FOR SOME JUDGEWHOMMAKE THEIR OWN PUNISHMENTS FOR WHOMEVER THEY WANT BYMISAPPLYINGSTATUES MANIFESTLY... HALF OF OHIO HAS JUMPED ON THE CORR UPTION BAN WAGONOF MIS READING THIS STATUE..

-7 E. R.C. 2941.1413 SPECIFICATION CONCERNING PRIOR FELONYO. VI OFFENSES.AGAIN VIOLATES THE EX POST FACTO AND RETROAVTIVITYCLAUSE'S.. I WOULD THINKTHIS UNCONSTITUTIONAL STATUES PUNISHES YOUFOR PRIOR FELONYD. UI.S THAT YOUHAD IN THE PASTAND HAVE ALREADYBEENPUNISHED FOR BYLAW...BUT YOUTELL MEHIGHLYINTELLIGENT.IUDGES DOES THIS LAWAS WELL VIOLATE THE CONSTITUITONANDCLA USE'S IS THIS LAW FOR PRIOR FELONYO. V.I.'SAS IT STATES OR IS IT FOR ANYKIND OFO. VIAS IT DOES NOT STATE/? PLEASE ELABORATE...

F. I ROBERT HARSHARE ENTITLED TO IMMEDL4TE RELIEFFROM UNLAWFULIMPRISONMENT... IN THEALTERNATIVE IMMEDIATE RELIEF ON O.R. BOND AWAITINGTHE GRANTING OFHABEAS CORPUS RELEIF WHICHIS PLAINLY WARRANTED.. I FORONE WAS NEVER INDICTED FOR OR FOUND GUILTY OFEITHER OF THESErPF/'7FIv d T7^ n7C .. I HAi i i:7O FEiv vi'RECORD OFA1V I^1►l%v'D SO THE 1VlAl.l (,lV UJ^

ABUSE OFDICRETIONSENTENCING ME TO THE MULTI FELONY OFFENDERSPECIFICATTIONISA CLEAR ABUSE OFAUTHORITYAND STATUTORYANDCONSTITUTIONAL VIOLA.TIONSANDAS SUCHIMMEDL4TE RELIEF MUST BE GRANTED.PLEASE IN THE NAME OF GOD AND UNDER THE BANNER OFJUSTICE THIS IS TOO B VI O US „ UNL A W F UL I MP R I S O NME N T. ..

The Voict for-Vagueness DoctrineG. Due process demands that the state provide meaningful standards in its laws. A law must give fair

notice to the citizenry of the conduct proscribed and the penalty to be affixed if that law is breached.See, generally, Kolender v. Lawson (1983), 461 U.S. 352, 357-358 103 S Ct 1855, 75 L Ed 2d 903;Colten v. Kentucky (1972) 407 U.S. 104 110 92 S Ct 1953 32 L Ed 2d 584 Implicitly, the law mustalso convey an understandable standard capable of enforcement in the courts, *379 Giaccio v.Pennsvlvania (1966) 382 U.S. 399, 403, 86 S Ct 518 15 L Ed 2d 447 for judicial review is anecessary constitutional counterpoise to the broad legislative prerogative to promulgate codes ofconduct.

-7

H. Although the vagueness doctrine is. perhaps most familiar in the context of criminal law, "[v]aguelaws in any area suffer a constitutional infirmity." Ashton v. Kentucky (1966), 384 U.S. 195, 200, 86S.Ct. 1407,.16 L.Ed.2d 469. As the United States Supreme Court has explained:

1. "Vague laws offend several important values. First, because we assume that man is free to steerbetween lawful and unlawful conduct, we insist that laws give the person of ordinary intelligence areasonable opportunity to know what is prohibited, so that he may act accordingly. Vague laws maytrap the innocent by not providing fair warning. Second, if arbitrary and discriminatory enforcement isto be prevented, laws must provide explicit standards for those who apply them. A vague lawimpermissibly delegates basic policy matters to police [officers], judges, and juries for resolution on anad hoc and subjective basis, with the attendant dangers of arbitrary and discriminatory application."(Footnotes omitted.) Grayned v. Rockford (1972), 408 U.S. 104, 108-109, 92 S.Ct. 2294 33 L.Ed.2d222.

J. When a statute is challenged under the due-process doctrine prohibiting vagueness, the courtmust determine whether the enactment (1) provides sufficient notice of its proscriptions to facilitatecompliance by persons of ordinary intelligence and (2) is specific enough to prevent officialarbitrariness or discrimination in its enforcement. Kolender, 461 U.S. at 357, 103 S.Ct. 1855, 75L.Ed.2d 903. The determination of whether a statute is impermissibly imprecise, indefinite, orincomprehensible, see Buckley v. Wilkins, 105 Ohio St.3d 350, 2005-Ohio-2166, 826 N.E.2d 811 ¶ 19and Coates v. Cincinnati (1971), 402 U.S. 611, 614, 91 S.Ct. 1686, 29 L.Ed.2d 214 must be made inlight of the facts presented in the given case and the nature of the enactment challenged. HoffmanEstates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates Inc. (1982) , 455 U S 489, 495 102 S Ct 1186 , 71 L Ed 2d 362

14s Iti1iCU OVLO A-EOst..ot-y 603G4Il^^^t: r .. JA c .I I

1hNeV "wcA^^ W l,lldE: i^uL1^t- ^VWE UI kja, 1.q ll^F^' S hAl^

^.(a^1511 r ^"l , [S I^ ^^) ^Ac^ ^1l'^^kkt^s °Nv^ ^^i) ,^° ^.,^^tC`S

VL- ^A^- Oa Cl^^ ^^ ^ WW,.4- 4LC- tio ^^ ^^J M^^^sOr MLz^s-,5+41v^;^ -^kc ^vs vL vci E7L4- -

1ANO ®^Ib A+40QOE^J l^v^Y^kzS

4

STATE OF OHIO / SS AFFIDAVIT OF REOBERT HARSH

COUNTYOF ROSS

NOW COMES ROBERT HARSHBEING DULYCAUTIONED AND ADVISED OF THE LAWS

UNDER THE PENALTYOF PERJURYHEREBYDEPOSES AND AVERS;

1. IAMOFAGE TO TESTIFYAND HAVE KNOWLEDGE OF THE FACTS HEREEIN

2. DOCUMENT'S ARE TRUE COPIES OF ORIGINALS.

3. I HAVE DIRECT CONTROVERSY WITH THESE STATUES AND ACTIONS OF THE B.M. V. (

B UREA U OF MOTOR VEHICLES).

4. A DECLA RA TOR YJUDGMENT ACTION MAYBE FILED INANYCOURT OF RECORD AT

ANYTIME, AND IS AN independent A CTIONA CCORDING TO LAW, BROUGHT BYSTATUE'S

SEE... BILLJS V TOLEDO 63, OHIO ,APP 2D, 18817, O® 3D, 410 NE 2D, 767.

® R.C. 2941.1413 SPECIFICATION CONCERNING PRIOR FELONYO. VI OFFENSE'S

(EMPHASISADDED "PRIOR FELONY")

O R. C 2941.1416 SPECIFICATION CONCERNING PRIOR

MISDEMEANOR O. VI OFFENSES .("EMPHASISADDED PRIOR MISDEMEANOR ")

® R.C. 4511.19 DRIVING WHILE UNDER THE INFLUENCE OFALCOHOL OR DRUGS •TEST'S•

PRESUMPTIONS: PENALTIES' IMMUNITYFOR THOSE WITHDRAWING BLOOD ETC..

(EMPHASISADDED A 10 PAGE STATUE CLEARLY UNCOMPREHENABLE TOAVERAGE

CITIZEN)

m B.M. V TRYING TO COMPILE NUMEROUS FINESAND FEES UPONMR. HARSH FOR HIS

ENTIRE DURATION OFHIS DRIVING RECORD WHEN THE LAWAND STARE DECISIS

CLEARLYSTATE ONE 30.00 DOLLAR FEE PER REOUEST OFREINSTATEMENT OF

DRIVERS LICENSE. NOT.YOU OWE US FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS INREINSTATEMENT

FEES SINCE YOU WERE A TEENAGER AND WE EILL NOT REINSTATE YOUR DRIVERS

LICENSE UNTIL YOUPAY US TWENTYREINSTATEMENT FEES TOTALLING FIVE

THOUSAND DOLLARS... THIS IS HIGHWAYROBBERY.I CANNOTAFFORD TO EVER PAY

THATAND I WILL NOT EVER PAYTIIAT UNLAWFUL COMPILING OF FEE'S FOR ONE

REOUEST TO DRIVE... SEE JUDY V B.M. V. 100 OHIO ST 3D.122,797.NE. 2D 45. 2003

OHIO 5277.

ln Buckley v. Wilkins, 105 Ohio St.3d 350,826 N.E.2d 811, 2005-Ohio-2166, at ¶ 17-19, the OhioSupreme Court discussed the void for vagueness doctrine as follows:

:5

6. A PARTY WHOAI"AIyESA IT1XF'LYDF-MAX'II FO.l?.IURB3 TRIAL INA DECLARATORY

.IU73GME_?dT ACTIO14TEl!i-Ell PP.IRI,^'UAsVI` PU-,'q. C. 2721. fl.`,` ISL'NTI'TLE72 TO TRL4LRY.IURY

ON QUESTId7Xg OF F`ACI'S; SEE... HARLEYSVILLE ArIL'T;, INS, CO. V. SANTORA 3,0

APP3D, 3 OBR, 289,444,NE2D,1076

7. A IIEC'LAR4I'ORY.TUDGMLi^VTA CTI0:%Fr.,I^"AY ilbF L'I°OUGIdTATANY TIME FILED Anavanee'

PURSUAtRTT TOR. C CL 4d-'1' 2121 DESI'I_'a'ETs-IE FACT 27I14T AND, ALTERNATIVE REMEDY

MIGHT EXSIST T'O A PARTY ( SL'E... CENTI2.^L 1^'IO'1'£1RS CORP V. PEPPER PIKE 63, O

APP 2D 34, 13y 0t33D,347,a09,NE2D,25-S)

8. THE PETITIONER HA-S.4 DIRSECT CO; +FF;1C'T Ii ITH TILE STATUES OIII® REVISEII

CFlI3ES R.C. 4511.19 AND R.C. 2941.1416 ^:^ND 21+41,1413.^314'^ THEADMINISTRATPmBNS

R.3'I.V ORDER WHICH IS C331VIi OI.JNDING THE PETITIONERS ENTIRE DRIVING

RECORD AND TRYING STkt;;K ALL TF;E FEES ILLEG ALLY FOR A BALANCE OF

4,820.00 BEING FOUR THOUSAND EIGHT IIIJNDIIE,D AND TWENTY DOLLARS. THIS IS

HIGHLY ILLEGAL AND CON'IRARY'I'O n_tlW AND e:ASE LAW SEE.... ( JUDY V.

B.M.V. 100 d31IIIl S JID12.2n 797 N^1^, D,4:3L 2t^i^^3 5277) AND N®RTIILAN REC

AND SOIELLCLIJI3 V. CITY ^-)FCL-`?^^^wIS°_^?5_ 2ffJ) 193WL 3487I3fII01983 CITING

TRIAL COURT E:RRtINEG USLY DECLINED TO ACCEPT JIJIlISTIC7i II$N. CITING ANY

COURT OF RECORD WIIEN CALLED UPON, MAkYDECLARE RIGHTS STATUS OR

'<;TIIER LE "'AI... YsF.a:.AggeaNS a.e.,E, Cgr°i`;iS uI"ll;'d'It1rJ ALI'I`Y tll+ STATIJES OR

LAWFULNESS OF ADI^/'IiNISTRA"I'I1%E ACTIONS.) AS S'I,TCII MR. HARSH CALLED UPON

THIS COURT BECAUSE HE IS RESIDING iN THIS COUNTY AND THIS SEEMS TO BE AFAIR COUNTY WITI-I kNTELLI(QE WN'1" JU)•iES... SE^+^,.._PACK V. CITY OF

CLEVELAND QIIlQ ST 313, 1 ^^_, ^w'lfL ljVs :34.2 §LAI ,AA^ ^ 1z23 10 I^.R.166. ®IIIOAUG 0=1.1982

9. THERE I9fB PLE7°IIORdC f,f^^01 ,-I OF Cf `" .e AaV 9^:4TING TillS CFlURT SII,4LL ISSUE

A DECL,4RATa7AY JPI.JG,VENT S?'rFT3NG THF^; ,4, €'.'I'$ON„ OF TIIE B. M. VARE ILLEGAL AND

I.SSI7EAN ORDER T® Rfe%F V TO T I'I A147i`eIA I`E TIIFa' Ob 7IAl G:r;DLI' ItEINSIfiTE1VINT FEES

TIIAT IIfHVE EEEN AlI`3.j,4.t'f'Ffi-EI,Y CCJAfP(.Pa"JNDE DAGAI!lTST ,R (pRERT gAR.4H.4ND

fflNYROs3YE.'^.SE FffI§I V)al,t'"E736+INC IHIS T00. TIIERE SHALL BE ONLY

ONE REINSTATEMENI" 1%EEOF FHII'T1' D13I.I^i.P,S FGI' ONr^' REQUEST FOR DRIVING

LICENSEREI^ST^?"EiVIE14^'I^..^fE^Y YOU CANNOTAYIAWEEEP STfflCIfINGTIIE

g'INESAND FEES VPGl'v"EA C E-il OTRE1; fBNE e? : QJESI"f3NE FEEGETIIIRTYDaILLARS.

SEE... JUDY V. D.1V1X llII OHIC) ST 3I^. 122. 797 NE ^F3 45 2003 OHIO 5277

SEE... JIJDY ^R.^'1.5j rlE sJ 2004,'^YI^ 2^84,371 -lOOs t'^'^1It;.3 5673 OHIO APP 6TH DIST

OCT 22, 2004 CITING THE I3.MN :^9

AND FEES. R.C 4511.191^R.kCKA1.,L ILLEGAL STACKING OF FINES

10. TIIERE ISA EI.ETHORP_: AMOa7'"dT OF CAEE.L.40'Sa ARE I bECISMS STATING NO

IDRISONTIIVIEIS,4JT7TOR-IM9 FOR FIRST iIMYEI%E :;^riY zu'OT3ti'^`D.UL ESPECIALI,Y

FROM TIIIS DIS4RICT I"OER. ^Ef,STp4,^^ C3^± IiELD 200 OHIO 1941

. 2000 VVI a672^0^ ^I^`Itb^'^ rsll^ sx^h^mS!^_^^U:..XA'_ 3FIANNEIIIAND

BALDWIN SECTION _tt]a^ Q-j;ja D.U.I. ElEE,Cti`^ ING^.

SEE... DIP.ECT f;f..NT^^.XIL!q-^ -L_ _Ag1!.s^ 4 i!F ♦ Rs

L V°iJ3 11E4%bEi4,S CO£Q.Y2JEAl'C F^^1HTQ

^; WARDEN C.C.I. 1;05°

O41TItf AND ODllO ATTORNEY GENERAI.

STATED ON THE ^IMPRE "_IRN'l`I I`HE O1-1IO REYISED CODE

D.iT.I LAWS OI^' SPECII3f 4l[Q:^ 8 }"A-Tl k_S _^t.s r 1^1_^_1t4^ ^T 1^E DEf I ARED

ITNCONSTITI7TIOH-AI.. O tV^;R'^ Y ^-I:P?i3t^..I3F E AND

IJNI.AWFIiI,...SEE... ROBERT 1^1^kj1v^^ _Atv ?L^'€Ei^ STATE S APPEAL

COURT CASE NO 09 ,? y S f'«' "II^'G xE '^ HE 1€j;RI!?^ ItFLDEItAL. IIJDGE AND TIIE

OHIO ATTQRhjY G^^ i^ ^^/^:^:I-N I^f ^z 1lk^-€ & ^" ^al^_AA10ho21S CASE STATED THEY

DO NOT f Oilft II EII^ "vI3 i'^^ fBll^fb i^^f Lr.!?^ ,,2 !ja_I!'If;'zTIONS WHAT DO YOU

TIiINK TI-IE APPE.,I, svc3^ I^1 =.W,^ J s^. R c. 45J1 -, iq b lS4' BE DECLARED OVERLY

BROADANDL=^^O?°t^'^1 RI ka^^;,^.2TOTHEJUDGES

AND OHIO ATTO RNLI^ Ela aygy f_ AVERAGE JOE

THINKS ??? ??

^

Gv1 Id ^ ^C^;E-:s

6c- 'st tJ^^

1^E1NSTATEMEIVT/P3F81OCEES1NG FEE

PAYMENT INSTRUGTIOIV S

^ ( ,/^

S^ ^^ {^^^^, lto.Y^^ `I,5, oZ1C.QJ :^Roc)s -

IMF0:RTANT:f TO ENSURE PROPEFi CRf-IIIT TO YOUR ACCOUNT YOU ICIICIw:

Make your check or money order payabl,e to:OHIO TREASURER RICHARD CORDRAY

D() NOT $:ENO CASH

your chenk or mcr'ney ttrder number in the box praut'ded on ihe frottt Qf thont re'ceip!

+ V1i`n"ta,yourBMV aecount rauerrbar srn your chEck or mortay ordiar

* Donot atapfe your ehe^* tar morao-}^ order to tbe pa,ym.ent c-,ouport

+ Use the ancfosed wirrdow env-elopewMon seneling your payrhent

r Do tr4t imluda adefftibrlzti carrasponde-ncr~

DETAGH THIS f?C1RT1{)N AhtD:MAtL WfTT14YC3UR PAYMENT

REINSTA'rEtillENT Fi=E PAYNlEh1T RMEAp'T BMV. .EiltflVAt'U`otlritUUtYTE1aYC010 5 09/24/2007

RMT+t;ase Number GheOk.Nun7bsr: n q q ©8e7nstate5iterit Fees:

ROBERT T HARS

q Check onky ifaddress 9i5 inePrlr1t erir"i-e.et address beiAw

2 OHLC) BUffEAU OF MOTfi3R VEHBGLES0 ATTFI: RE FEES0 P O'803i' 10205 CO1.L9MSUS OH 4,3216-6520

IIIIIIIIIIIININIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIIIINIIIIIIIIIINIIII IIIIIIIIIIIII

Moriey C7rder'IVumtSer. U Lf LJ [] Q qqqqqq

Amount Enclosed: $ q, ED q q • q []

®s,treBt

City

IIIIIIIIIIIiIIIIIIIIIIIIIINIIII IIIIIIIIIIII^

Rt^ : Zig

II IIIII IIIIII IIIII IIIN IIIII IIII IIII

AVF P^ F01P. ^S

1. THAT THE ^s'I:^^^ ^^EVIR_,^.:CODE lk.C...lQ41.14I3 C'O1®ICEIBNING

PRIOR F:vLOWS^^' ^i;C1 £,1;'a ^ ut l L.7'i,w r' p' , re".1V4,?%::t ',' .Riv:^^S' -AA,D OVFRBROAD

DOC'gRT4JE l,5sy"r, OPRs:eGR &T,0I*,SOA' t^'';^r1^ITaIAVE'TIFEMENS

REA AND UN3:eERST4NT^,1B' ';TP'^ /-F W' -€ t{ E.is1 FACao Vtol,aTr,-nr

2. THAT THE OHIO REVISEi"? COD'E .iirC 2941.:1416 'iPE.CF:, (CATz.ON CONCERNING

PI2IC3R `yDET^i^ A^N 2±-^ I ,€. ^ t :4D' E '^.( '.+' D, :;la t 07 ^5^"€°'B ''L; T 10T'e1AL ,OVERI.,Y BROAII

ORVOID, F0t^ f.%IGUL,,'Af S3 o: Xll l -Rfi1°afo l"s 1 "_'T .w' F€:"j'JFP.a +;'r iW^TSDE:'3f ,^ANORS OR

T'E^ONi'. SDss'd: ^sSf ^' s^ a d ^ iA;+ ^ r$f'? x.^ ^ Ys _Ar: e 1'.fh A1, A l-P 'ld.f. i: G'r.E Ml NTAL STATE

INITCA1'?'THEAVERA€aE R'dE:Ji"t °3^)%.rw,^,1^;'s''R"II'7i^'E.IUDGESANDTI7E

OMIOA27ORt`dE YG JDTKEI,AWSTFIEN

3. THATTHJ 0,11I0 ^^^^FVr,^,EYj C'GI)Y P,.C, 45IL19 mkFRX^IO^S WHILEITNIIEIZTIIE

IN E'I.,U E N N"E alF A L C G, f^°^^Li ¢J, . Rk ,J(pi.^ ^^B U S T 10R Vtyl T IIEC II+"IE I3

CON CE N T?lkT 13 N 0 E rxI ^,-.Lt 1 ;1 R 4 ^ lc^i OF A I l),R `r "f Io7'AIN I3CuD II.Y

SUBSTANCES CHEMICAL TUd, ; YANi ::5 ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ 4n '+,^ ^. Nz?"OW, CAN TIIEY GET ANYMORE

IN THE 01110 €(, h>^°'}..n ". '/rTf'.x <i4'_x7l'". L.fGRSAND SENTENCES

COMINF'a I"POl317 Ofi!2't/.r s4^ €.'yAPrei Y^'l THE 14'EDERAL JUDGE

REC'IChTlITU A-.r410 d"ITA P"'E?.'-ti-W^`cA1V,1V°O''r COVIq'I'RF17E7VD TMESED.,iui 1u4Td'SIN

OIIIO4 WE MA " a;Ne? G tlL` AS 'Y 141EW 141,4N,€: I.?I.E'.PE_YA1,TIES.:

INVOIVED'; SP

WEI,I, C0lN4:^^^-L

DO NOT KNOW T^HE I'ED'am"!_ "x_ECI)^ ^s

FELON:L,4^'r,u^ 1^19Eldl:

BEI'ORE;

CORRE(

EVE.RY e; Q I7ai`T T

.CV..4B S.D. OF OHIO.

TTORNE'Y GENERAL

C ER'!CAI!'d OHI® REVISED

NIW€_YJI1. TIIIS LAW IS A

F-PF,ONY OR

LIIjvG ^t'^ZtODY

A ER iN EVERY COUNTYIN

RAGE .7OE DOES

A"AI,LOWED TO

7

AP, THE PETITIONER HAS FILED NUMEROUS PLEADINGS STATING THE TRUE

READING OF THE LAW, BUT THE CORRUPTION IS RAMPANT THROUGHOUT THE

BUTLER COUNTY GOVERMENT OFFICIALS. IT SEEMS CORRUPTION AND IGNORANCE

OF THE LAWS GOES HAND IN HAND IN BUTLER COUNTY. CONSISTANCY IS ONLY A

VIRTUE DREAMED OF IN BUTLER COUNTY AS THE RECORDS ARE PLETHORIC.

-p. THIS SPECIFICATION STATUE IS VOID FOR VAGUENESS DOES NOT GIVE FAIR

NOTICE OF THE CRIMES HAVING TO HAVE BEEN COMMITTED OR THE MENS REA AND

OR CULPABLE MENTAL STATE. DOES THIS LAW MEAN PRIOR FELONYS AS IT STATES

OR AS THE IGNORANT ONES AAPEEAR TO READ IT AS PRIOR MISDEMEANORS.

10< THEREFORE THIS STATUE IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL FAILS ON WHAT CONDUCT IS

PROHIBITED BY LAW AND ENCOURAGES ARBITRARY AND CORRUPT SENTENCING

ALSO DISCRIMINATORY ENFORCEMENT.

SEE... STATE V.P,NDERSON 1991 57.OHI0 ST 3D 168

SEE... STATE V. KLINCK 189.44.OHI0 ST 3D 108

SEE... STATE V. TANNER 1984.15.OHIO ST.3D.1 ALSO TANNER SUPRA AT 2 AND O R C

147

THE VOID FOR VAUGEUNESS DOCTRINE MUST SHOW THE A PENAL

STATUE IS UNDERSTANDABLE AND DEFINES THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE WHICH

ORDINARY PEOPLE CAN UNDERSTAND. NOW IF YOU HAVE IMPOSTERS WITH LAW

DEGREES WHO CAN NOT UNDERSTAND THIS STATUE ,I REST MY CASE.

SEE... KOLENDER V. LAWSON 1983 461,U.S,352 WHEN A STATUE IS CHALLENGED

PETITIONER MUST SHOW THE STATUE IS VAGUE.

SEE... SMITH V. GOUGEN 1974, 415,U.S., 566, 574,

SEE.,. SKILLING V. U.S 130 S.CT. 2896,U.S. 2010 CITING STATUES THAT DO NOT

GIVE FAIR NOTICE AND ENCOURAGE ARBITRARY AND DISCIRMINATORY

PROSECUTIONS AS THE WESTLAW AND LEXIS NEXIS CASE LAWS ARE PLETHORIC

WITH.

^.C. Oil Li 1.1 LiVow^

0-^AuSgt^-'

p

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

1. That this motioned be sustained,declaratory judgment and injunctive

relief in any court of record with controversy.

2.Pursuant to RC. 2721.02 and RC 2721.03 facts and findings and conclusions

of law... CIV,R 52 (A),57, 65 (A)(B)(2) U.S. CONST. 5th an 14th /0HI0 CONST

3.That the void for vagueness doctrine invoked,over broad an ex post facto

doctrine invoked RC. 2941.1413.... RC 2941.1416 ..... RC 4511.19 ....

all three statues are declared UNCONSTITUIONAL...

4.That the actions of the B.M.V. are declared unlawful and a cease and decist

order to the B.M.V. to only impose the one time fee for one request on his

driving license reinstatement fee of 30.00 thirty dollars is charged to the

petitioner and the void bill is voided... injunctive relief request..

pusuant to SEE... JUDY V. B.M.V. 100 ST 3d 122,797,NE, @D45,ohio 2003-0

ONLY ONE FEE PER ONLY ONE REQUEST FOR DRIVING LICENSE REINSTATEPIENT IS ALLOWED

NOT ALLOWED TO COP9PILE ALL FEES AS THEY DID TO PIR. HARSH, STOP THIS FRAUD...

THEY ARE CHARGING P7R. HARSH FOR ATLEAST TWENTY OLD, PAST FEES THE B.M.V KEEPS

ILLEGALLY STACKING AND COMPOUNDING PNLTIPLE FINES AND FEES.... THIS PRACTICE

MUST BE STOPPED....

RESPECTFULLY SUBPIITTED,

88Sr+/30S _SHP0 B(Y, 120LEBANON OHIO

45036

CC

OHIO attorney general

150 east gay st.

COLUMBUS, OH 43215

U.S. MAIL 02/13/2012

*** HONORABLE CLERK OF THE COURT

TIPIE STAPIPED RETURN COPY REQUESTED PLAESE..... THANK YOU & GOD BLESS

691 INDICTMENT 2941.1419

2941.•I415 Specitications conrerning drug or at-cohol,reJated vehieglarhomiCide of.peace officerin constrµction zone and.prffor•^convictions

(A) Imposifiout of a three=year ptandatory prison term upoaanoffender under divison (1))(6) of sectioa 2929.14 of the 17evisedCode is precluded unlesstlie offender i8 convicted of or piearisguilty to violating division (A)(1) or, ((2) of section 2903.06 of theRevised Code and unless the indietment; count in the indictment;or information charging the offense specifies that.the offenderprevtously has.been convicted.of or pleadedrsg,uilty {w three ^more violatlonsof division (4) or (B) ©i' sepnon 4Sk1.19 of theRevisetf Codetn' aa-dtjuidafent'offease; grthkeeor'§nore vig7a-tiosls nf anycombitiation o"f1thosedivislons^'and ofEehses. Tltespecifidatiion-shall be ^state'd,'at the etitl of''the,tiody of theindietment, count; of information hnd shall be statedin sUbstan-tjally rhe follosvittg ftordi:

"SPECIFICATION (or, SPECZI',IC,ATION TO;TfIE FIRSTCOU1V'I). 'k'hC, Grrand Juro,cs ^pr insert tJrg, person's or theprosecuttng attoi'nqy"s nameayhen appropriate^ furthef find andspecify tnat (set forti: tha:! the offender prev.iously hus beenconvicted of or pleaded guilty to three of more'violations ofdivision (A) or (B) of section 4511,19 of>tl7e Revised Code or anegdivalentoffepse„or.;hreeor mqre„violations,of any combina,-tion of those divisions snd offenses)."

(B) The specificattop,described in divisiqn,(A) of.this sectiqnmay be a}sed,in a daljnqvent child prp,eeedi,ng in; themanncr andfor: the purpose dqsoribed in section 2152.17 0 fhe Revised Code.

(C) As used.in this section, "equivalentoffense",hasthe "samemeaning as in section 4511.181 of the Revised Code.

"SPL.CIFICATIO'N' (oz SPECIFICATION TO 1'HE FIRSTCOUNT). The grand jurors(or"insert the person's or prqsecutingattorney's name when appropriate)"further find and specifythat(set forth the alleged offender's interest in the property; adescription of the property sutijectto forfeiture, and any allegeduse or intended use of the property in the commission orfacilitation of the offense)."

(B) The trier of fact shall determine whether theproperty issubject to forfeiture. .

(C) Tfie specification described in division (A) of thrs sectionmay be used in a delinquent child proceeding.

(266H241, eff 74-07) ... .. . . . . .

2941.1418 Attempted rape specification(A) Imposition of a mandatory indefinite prison torm consist-

ing of a thmimuni Yerm of five years and a maximum term oftwenty-five years $pdn an offender puxsuant to divjsion(A)(3)(e)(ii) or (B)(2)(a) of sedtion2971.03 of'[lie Revised trodeis precluded unless tbe offeritler is convicted of or pleads guilty toatfempte3rape and'unless tbe i>itiictment; count in the in'rliet-ment, orinformationcharging the offense specifies thattheoffender was sixteen;,yea,rs of.ageor older at-the time ofthecommission of the offense and that,=had the ofEender-completedthe rape that was attempted, the offender would have been guiltyof rape{n'violation of division (A)(1)(b) of section 2907.02 of theRevise, Cade.

(B) Thespecihcation shall be stated at the end of the body ofthe'indictihent, coun't;or informaHon and'sl rall be stated insubstantiaily the foBoi4iitg fotm: ".. . -- . ^ ..

(2004 H 52, eff.6-1 09). "SPECIFICATION (or, SPECIFICATION 1'O THE FIRBTCO[7NT). The GrAndJurors (or insert the'fserson's or theprosecuting attorney's name when appropriate) ffirther fmd and

29r{1.141.^ ^peerficatlon concerning pl^ioramisde- specify that (see$brPh'that the offezider was sixteen years of agemean0l'f^^I bfFehSe^-^"' or older at the time ofthe commtssion of the offf ense and that;

(A ^)Im osition of amandatory, additional , definite jail ferm of had the of[ender eoinpletgd the rape that was attempted,."the

up to six monthsupon an offenler under, aivision (E) of section ofEender woutd have been guilty of a viola,tion of division

2929,^24 of the Revised Code is preeluded unless the informa'tion {A^(1)(b) b£ ^soanoa 29Q^"l12 pt the Revisad Cod

. ; _. :. . .charging a violali4n^g€d'LVisiqns(hi)'i;af;,ao,ctidn-p511,.1(1 ofwtljp (20068 ¢60,e,fif.1-2+07)

th^'foffense pr^Wib`l sly has been dqniicfett`bf or ^l^ade^;gufity to 2941.1419 . Attemptatf rape specitication; victimfitle bt ^ more' ediuvalertt' offeases ' Tlre Saeciftpati0n sltll"`tie

be in substantially the folloµ!ingform: iI thatwas attempted, the offender would have been guilty ofa

(200It" _H 163, eff. 9-23-04) ^ = - j, t e fo7lo}ymg appbes; .. ; .

5-^ qj4e^ ((4J lll (A) 1'he yicnm was under ten years of age, •

294r1.^;417, Specification concerning forfeiture 4Y 'b'be Rffenqer, attempted to commit rape by 'pv;ppsg^ly

propeC(3' . • -. - . qompelling the viimto 'submit byfqTCe qr threat of force;`anrlthe offenderwas sixte,eq years of age or older at.tlie time of the

(A) Property is not subjec[ to forfeiture in a criminal case commis`sionof the offense,unless the indictment, count in the indictment, or information The speeification shall be stated at the end of the body of theohazging the.<offense,specifje^to,thg,^estep},it is fe,d^sonabjy indretment,89unt, orwformafion andshall be statedhn substan-knowh at the time of fihng, tYte nature and extent qf the alleged tially the following form:

:. ^^ . ,.dffendtr's interest'in the property, a deseription of'the property,.and, if the property as'aliegeii to Be an instlnmental'1ty, fhe "SPE `L`IFICATION (oY; SPECIFICATION TC}THE FIRSTalleged use or "nterrded use of t]ie p"rop0rty ip'the commission or CO 'tJNT). The Grand Jurors (6r insert tbg petson's or thefacilitaiion of the'df#ense The'specificatioashah be stated at the prosecnting attdrney's11'na$re when appfopriate) f"vi'^her fiad andend of the body afthe indictment, cquiii, or information and shall specify that (set forth that, had Yhe ofPender comple`eed the rape

oty ,.offense, previousiy had been conv3cted of or pleaded guilty to frve P -• .: 1 F... p bnor more equivalent offensesq "' attempted rap,e and'unless, the tn2iictment, ^couut.' in the indict-

.^, mgnt, or infortoa^tion char^nt, tY{e, offense specifies that, had the(B) As u`seii 'n division (A) of this section , equrvalent of- offendar cqnapleted the raPe thnt *rlas atteatp]he offender

fense" has the same meaning as in section 4511."1SYt of the would ltave 17een guilty of rape irt volation of divisj,on (A)("1)(b)Revis,ed Code. , . . _ ... , ohf sGnton.290'7.Q2 of the Revised Code and apecifies thao one of

stafed fn silbataufiI l( `y the folltfwtng..form.'" " ' '; Iinposition of a mat1datory,indefidi[e prison tertrm'ebnsisting; ofa minimum term of ten years and a masimutti tetm of'fife`.SPECIF.ICATPON.. (Insert . tbe peison s or the proSeeuting

attorney's name as appropriate) furtherfinds and specifies that, anp^onment uppn !an offcnder pursuant to division(set,Eorth that tl^offender, within.twenty, y,ears oEcommitxing the ^)(3)(e)(i^i^ or (B)(2)(p) of section 2071.03 of tbeRevised Code

is reclpdedunless the offenderis cronvi tei) of orlea'ds il t'

.statedt t4e'en^'of t7ae hady of the{rrl'foi^'r'nanon aniS4°hall be updeiLen years 4,1[ agG., . .. _._ , -

AFFIDAVIT OF INDIGENCY $\(FR\-^^A

In re: Case No(s). ,Qc)\ ^ - .

In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 1746:

•'I, :^^' = ^-^ {c^l , declare under the penalty of perjury

under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and

correct as executed on this ^ day of 1^ g ^^J 20]^ ."

1. That I am currently incarcerated at the Warren CorrectionalInstitution;

2. That I do not have the funds to pay the cost within this action;

3. That I firmly believe that I am entitled to the relief requested;

4. That I do not have an attorney of law to undertake this task for me,so I must proceed pro se;

5. That I am indigent as defined by the Ohio Revised Code.

Respectfully Submitted,

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEASBUTLER COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIOCASE NO. CR2006-03-0500

Plaintiff:o i";p I ° i^r I',-: Q.:i

vs.

ROBERT T. HARSH'

Defendant

INDICTMENT

STATE OF OHIO, PAGE ONE OF TWOCOUNTY OF BUTLER, SS:

In the Year 2006

THE JURORS OF THE GRAND JURY OF THE STdTE OF OH/O, wlthin and for the body of thAeCounty aforesaitd, on their oaths, in the name and by the authority of the State ofOhio, do fend and presentthat:

COUNT ONE fOPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE UNDER THE INFLUENCE F`rOn or about February 11, 2006, at Butler County, Ohio, Robert T. Harsh did operate.any.sehicle,streetcar, or trackless trolley with)h this state while under the influence of alcohol, a drugof abuse, or a

combination of them, when the offender, within six years of the offense, has been plaviously convicted ofor pleaded guilty to three or four violations of division (A) or (B) of O.R.C. section 4511.19 or otherequivalent offenses or who within twenty yexrs of the offense, previously has been convicted of orpleaded guilty to five or more violations of that nature, wliicfi constitutes the offense of OPERATING AMOTOR VEHICLE UNDER THE iNFLUENCE, a Fourth Degree Felony, in violation of R.C.§4511.19(A)(1)(a), and against the peace and dignity of the State Of Ohio.SPECIFICATION. The Grand Jurors further find and specify that within twenty years of committing theoffense, the offender previously has been convicted of or pleaded guilty to five or more equivalentoffenses

COUNTTWOPOSSESSION OF MARIHUANA

On or about February 11, 2006, at Butler County, Ohio, Robert T. Harsh did knowingly obtain, possess,or use a controlled substance when the drug involved in the violation is marihuana or a compound,mixture, preparation, or substance containing marihuana other than hashish, which constitutes the offenseof POSSESSION OF MARIHUANA, a Minor Misdemeanor, in violation of R.C. §2925.11, and againstthe peace and dignity of the State Of Ohio.

COUNT THREEDRIVING UNDER OVI SUSPENSION

On or about February 11, 2006, at Butler County, Ohio, Robert T. Harsh did operate any motor vehicleuponpurposes prb>^^ roads and highways_or upon any public or private property used by the public for

ro^,,,K w^uun this state whiie the dnvers or commercial driver's licenseor permit or nonresident operating privilege has been suspended under section 4511.19, 4511.191[4511.19.1), or 4511.196 [4511.19.6] of the Revised Code or under section 4510.07 of the Revised Codefor a conviction of a violadon of a municipal OVI ordinance; which constitutes the offense of DRIVINGUNDER OVI SUSPENSION, a First Degree Misdemeanor, in violation of R.C. §4510.14(A), and againstthe peace and dignity of the State Of Ohio.

PAGE TWO OF TWOCR06-03-0500

COUNTFOURSPEED LIMITS

On or about February 11, 2006, at Butler County, Ohio, Robert T. Harsh did operate a motor vehicle,trackless trolley, or streetcar at a speed greater or less than is reasonable or proper, having due regard tothe traffic, surface, and width of the street or highway andany other conditions, and did drive any motorvehicle, trackless trolley, or streetcar in and upon any streefor highway at a greater speed than will permitthe person to bring it to a stop within the assured clear distance ahead, which constitutes the offense ofSPEED LIMITS, a Minor Misdemeanor, in violation of R.C. §4511.21, and against the peace znd dignityof the State Of Ohio.

Defendant arraigned, and pleads:

Guilty to this indictment DAYID L.q= p

ASSISTANTPROB SECUTING ATTORNEYyCINDY CARPENTERCLERK OF COURTS A TRUE BILL

By ^^t ^^q/^,^ ^^ 0Deputy FOREpERSON, GRA^^`ND JURy

b

. ."_ --"t'F'^URT OF COMMON PLEAS

2 1 PN^UZ4,ER COUNTY, OHIO

STATE OF OHIO F;^.t)UfiTY

P^trEii€: J COURTS

va.

ROBERTT.HARSli

Defendant

CASE NO. CR2006-03-0500

ONEY, J.

JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION ENTRY

On March 19, 2007 defendant's sentencing hearing was held pursuant to Ohio Revised CodeSection 2929.19. Defense attorney, Robert Rettich IIP and the defend®nt were present anddefendant was advised of and afforded all rights pursuant to Crim. R. 32. The Couri hasconsidered the record, the charges, the defendpnt's Guilty Finding by Jury, and findings as set fon:hon.the record and her.ein; oral statements, any victim impact statementend pro-sentence report, aswellas the prineipies andpurposes of sentencing under Ohio Revised Code Section 2929.11, andhas balanced the seriousness and recidivism factors of Ohio Revised CodeSection2929.12 andwhether or not community control is appropriate pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 2929.13,and finds that the defendant is not amenable toan available cominunitycontrcl sanction. Further,the Court has considered the defendant's present and future abilityto pay the amount of anysanction,fine or attorney'sfees.

The Court finds that the defendant has been found guilty of:

OPERATING A MOTOR VEHICLE UNDERTHE INFLUENCE as to Count One, a violation of RevisedCode Section 4511.19(A)(1)(a) a fourth degree felony. With respect to this Count, the defendantis hereby sentenced to: -'-'-----------°^^

Pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 4511.19(G)(1)(d)(i) a Mandatory Prison Term of 4 years.""-------^,-®,m

SPECIFICATIONas to Count One, and pursuant to Ohio Revised Code Section 2941.1413, anadditional Prison Term of t ee (3) ea '' pnsedas a mandatory and consecutive term pursuantto Revised Code Sectio 4511.191G)(1)(cl(ii). '(Z,^gp

DRIVING UNDER OVI SUSPENSION as to Count Three, a violation of Revised Code Section4510.14(A) a first degree misdemeanor. With respect to this Count,-the defendant is herebysentenced to:

Jail for a period of 6 months.

Pay a fine in the amount of $300.00 to the Butler County Clerk of Courts.

This sentence will be served coneurrently with the sentence imposed in Count One.

SPEED LIMITS as to Count Four, a violation of Revised Code Section 4511.21 a minormisdemeanor. With respect to this Count, the defendant ishereby sentenced to:

Court costs

PaosecanNCATTOaaBY, aunmCauan, omo

P.O.aox515,HSM1ID.TOe,Oa45et2-0515

t(//n1 Zx^-A/^(^AvGdiu1^ 4fjlJ

(^^V-X---fC S^P^a^SoW^s Su^2^ _5rK^- V w^^^-^,^E Lq t^tga)^^i^p ^

A1.410 Iucrc- 14-

^jGr^i`^ ►eSt^ `dS t3 RIcoF^sz E i'c^ t tcrr^ar^- Rus taic^z- R i

^^`tg ^-taaFs ^!;': 1 - _T6a^^-or^ d. t' "i

UA^^Lt3i c, t^taP i 9

0^I(e

Jail time credit for 68 days served is granted as of this date.

As to Count(s) One and Three:

The Court has notified the defendant that post release control is optional in this case up to amaximum of three (3) years, as well as the consequences for violating conditions of post releasecontrol imposed by the Parole Board under Revised Code Section 2967.28. The defendant isordered to sorve as part of this sentence any term of post release control imposetl by the ParoleBoard, and any prison term for violation of that post release control. The defendant is thereforeORDERED conveyed to the custody of the Ohio Departmerrt of Rehabilitation and Correction.

Defendant is ORDERED to pay

Costs of prosecution, supervision and any supervision fees permitted pursuant to Revised CodeSection 2929.18(A)(4).

It is FURTHER ORDERED that said defendant is fined the sum of $1,500.00 as tn Count One,$800.00 of which is a mandatory fine imposed pursuant to the provisions of OhloRevised Code,2929.18(3)(3) and 4511 .1901(1)Idllilil, and that the court makes the following equitable division ofthe mandatory fine in the amount of $800.00 to be dlstributed pursuant to revised Code4511.18(0)(6) $270.00 of the fine shall be paid to the enforcement and education fund establishedfor the Ohio State Highway Patrol, which the court determines is the law enforcement agencyprimarily responsible for the arrest of the offender; $440.00 of the fine shall be paid to the OhioDepartment of Rehabilitation and Corrections; and the balance of the fine shall be disbursed asotherwise provided by law.

Fines are to be paid to the 6utler County Adult Prabation Department.

It is FURTHER ORDERED, pursuant to Revised Code 4507.16, that the defendant's pleasuredriving, operator's Ilcensc or any other driving permits or privileges shell be suspended for a term of10 years. Said term will begin March 19, 2007. Said term will end on March 18, 2017.

It is FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall notify the Ohio Bureau of Motor Vehicles through form2724.

The Court further advised the detendant of all of his/her rights pursuant to Criminal Rule 32,including his/hor right to appeal the judgment, his/her right to appointed counsel at no cost, his/horright to have court documents provided to him/her at no costs, and his / her right to have notice ofappeal filed on his behalf,

Directive to Ohio Department of Rehabilitatiorr and Correction: Please notify the Butler CountyCourt of Common Pleas of any major changes of incarceration status Including but not limited torelease, transfer, execution or death of the deferrdant.

APPROVED AS TO FORM:

ROBIN N. PIPER`D^-PROSECUT{NG ATTORNEYBUTLER COUNTY, OHIO

DLK/rlmMarch 20, 2007

ENTER

PROSRC VI'MG /rITeRN1iV, Brll'I.NN COU4TY, 0lll11

P.O. Box 515, He.utnanrv, OH 45012-05t5

il

5e4 EQuiq l /W6^66-^- otn t rv^ -i 17c: /Or,z ,`5

^^ ^3s t c^kL^ a^--z U^L q4S,^S^C)^1t7 (4CYl ^ ^^-^o ^

33^5 ^^^3, ti^a ^V^Na.^v Lsc^ ^ ac oa-oK«3-L^U `1^4

L

^-(6) A+^cNs AR^' ^o o-76A3^LCQ- 90a;,^-

O^kic) ^C7c^Z R,C- a995.15 (aY^^4coc^2 ^Y l,vl5CS-l^(ta^ta^ < <:( A.ic:, ^P ^ O^^t

uL^LDCE I `T^^^ ^^2dJtC ^ k-aattn`S tAwO ^he= ^^4ARL/ `^wc-C^

(^^ ^vv)GrZtC4^lh^2C t' PL ^11o^cR^^ ^`5 CJ^ Ct^^-e-- ^Aw` 5 5 uepap--^-i h

^^q ?,2v2L }^tAe^ U^^ o^C ^ ^a2wcs ^q^^

Cc)uy--t^L pt^-) ^^^ li ^r W\a^^ 1I^^«u^

^S,rtc ^l^ W ^'R-'^ i^^(^Ze 5^.^uiv ^(awc)tAble

Ou^^ ^EEE^ ^t-w,^^k;^,

^L G<^G ^'\nFi04-50m U^) ^ AwX-A Pbr

`^Kles^ ^^^ ^^ ^^^ ^^^^^ ^ ^C^^(^^^CS►v`

1$'

01/21/2009 14:36 FAX 513B873489 Butler-Co-Pro-secutor

IN THE COURT OF COMMON PLEASBUTLER COUNTY; OHIO

STATE OF OHIO

Ptaintiff

vs.

ROBERT HARSH

Defendant

CASE NO: CR08 03 0500

(Judge Patrfcia S. Oney)

VEl3DtCT - COUNT EiIVE'

2002/002

We, the jury, being first duly impaneted and sworn, find the Defendant,Robert T. Harsh,

of operating a motor vehicleunder the influence

on or about the 11th day of February, 2006

, (') Insert "Guftty" or "Not guilty," according to your findings.

1.

2.

J.

4.

5

8.

/A il.A/j._ l l^ i 3 /(I (.vvrK.., ^^.^s^_

r _ / -/

12.

Dated this 41 _ dayof January, 2007.

ENTER

L^ C-A 6- CA-^jcz11