17
Centre for Energy, Environment & Sustainabilit y. Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research Centre Fuel poverty and poverty: What’s the difference? Robert Marchand Supervised by Prof. S.C. Lenny Koh, Dr Andrea Genovese and Prof. Alan Brennan

Centre for Energy, Environment & Sustainability. Logistics and Supply Chain Management Research Centre Fuel poverty and poverty: What’s the difference?

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

Fuel poverty and poverty:What’s the difference?

Robert Marchand

Supervised by Prof. S.C. Lenny Koh, Dr Andrea Genovese and Prof. Alan Brennan

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

2

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

3

“…it is often misleading to talk about fuel poverty as if it were some special breed of poverty that necessarily requires different measures from those that are generally

used to support the less well-off”(Hansard, December 16, 1985 col 131-8)

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

4

Drivers of Fuel Poverty1. Britain’s mild climate

• Heating Degree Day variation - number days below 15.5°C�e.g. 15.5 °C -13.5 °C = 2 HDD’s

• More than 3000 degree days p.a. is cold (Orton, 1988)

• Slow development of energy efficiency regulations

• 9 month heating season

Heating Degree Days Annual Average 1971 - 2000 (Met Office, 2010)

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

5

Drivers of Fuel Poverty2. Domestic building heritage

“In this country the principal faults of the past have been to neglect heat insulation in the construction of the house and to limit space heating to one or two rooms…In cold weather the British home is the smallest in the civilised world.”

Ministry of Fuel and Power, 1948, p.50

Household age by sector and ownership type (DCLG, 2012. p.53)

  private sector social sector

alldwellings

 owner

occupiedprivate rented

all private sector

local authority

housing association

all social sector

dwelling age              

pre 1919 21.0 40.0 24.8 3.8 9.4 6.7 21.71919-44 19.0 12.3 17.6 16.1 9.3 12.5 16.81945-64 18.9 10.7 17.3 38.0 24.7 31.0 19.61965-80 20.0 13.6 18.8 34.8 24.4 29.3 20.61981-90 8.4 7.4 8.2 6.1 12.5 9.5 8.4

post 1990 12.6 15.9 13.3 1.3 19.8 11.1 12.9Total 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

6

Drivers of Fuel Poverty

3. Historical preferences for open fires and fresh air• Homes primarily heated by solid fuels

4. Evolving thermal expectations• 1880: 4°C in bedroom, 12°C – 20°C in lounge

(Rudge, 2011)

• 1987: 18°C in bedroom, 21°C in living areas (WHO, 1984)

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

7

Health effects

“Energy is a critical, yet hugely neglected, determinant of human health…Energy is as important as any vaccine or medicine.” (Horton, 2007, p. 921)• Degree drop in temperature corresponds to 3500 Excess

Winter Deaths (Laake & Sveere, 1996)• Marmot review (2011) identifies increased:

•Circulatory diseases•Respiratory problems•Diabetes complications•Duodenal ulcers

•Osteoarthritis knee pain•Hip fractures•Mental Health Issues

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

8

Social Impacts• Predominantly anecdotal evidence (Thomson, Petticrew &

Morrison, 2001)• Increased risk of adolescent:

• Truancy from school

• Expulsion/exclusion from school

• Trouble with the police

(Liddell and Morris, 2010)

• Notable Reductions in:• Anti-social behaviour

• Dysfunctional families

• Teenage pregnancy

(Cornwall Council, 2011)

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

9

The Current Approach• A fuel poor household is

“…one which needs to spend more than 10% of its income on all fuel use and to heat its home to an adequate standard of warmth”

(DEFRA & DTI, 2001, p6)• Fuel poverty ratio:

Modelled Fuel Costs (i.e. Modelled consumption x price)

Income• Uses modelled energy needs• Combination of income, energy requirements and costs• Official National Statistic

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

10

The Current Approach

Fuel Poverty and Real Fuel PricesSource Annual Report on Fuel Poverty 2012 (DECC, 2012c)

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

11

80% of fuel poverty expenditure is not spent on the fuel poor

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

12

Comparing current approachesThe Current Approach The Hills Approach The Townsend Approach

Definition of fuel poverty

“…one which needs to spend more than 10% of its income on all fuel use and to heat its home to an adequate standard of warmth”.

“…households are considered fuel poor if they have required fuel costs that are above the median level; and were they to spend that amount they would be left with a residual income below the official poverty line.”

“…those needing to spend more than 10% of their total household income before housing costs (BHC) on all fuel used to heat their homes to an acceptable level”

Income Measurement

Full income, including housing benefit and Income Support for Mortgage Interest (ISMI). Not equivalised

AHC and equivalised in line with HBAI approach.

AHC and equivalised in line with HBAI approach

Data Sources

English Housing Survey DECC Quarterly Energy

census Sutherland Tables

English Housing Survey DECC Quarterly Energy

census Sutherland Tables

2003 English Housing Condition Survey

2001 UK Census

Level of concern/focusNational Indicator with data available at LSOA level

National Indicator Identification of fuel poor households at a local level

Objective and subjective data use

No consideration of subjective data in final measure

Rejects use of subjective data Reports both objective and subjective FP levels

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

13

Measuring Fuel Poverty

• Literature contends that fuel poverty is distinct from general poverty (Boardman, 1991. Hills, 2012.)

• Lack of extant literature to quantify whether current measure captures this

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

14

Methodology

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

15

Conclusions

• A SPT lens • enables a broader range of influences to be considered

• Moves away from the dominant thin account of the social world currently utilised

• Capturing quantitative and qualitative data on the front line of fuel poverty

• Aims to minimise socio-political dominance of fuel poverty measurement

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

16

Contributions• First model of Fuel Poverty built on a SPT framework

• More accurate, broader range of influences, whilst statistically and methodologically robust

• Enable a more accurate picture of Fuel Poverty • Enable policy makers to understand spatial distribution, extent and depth

of fuel poverty

• Improve accountability of government interventions and policies towards WHECA 2016 deadline

• Provide a Composite Indicator on OECD guidelines for future development for international comparison

• Adapt & develop existing stakeholder mapping for application in a social issue research context

Centre forEnergy,Environment &Sustainability.

Logistics andSupply Chain ManagementResearch Centre

17

“I know that some will see this question of definition as a distraction from the core task of designing and delivering effective policies helping those in fuel poverty. But I

am clear that unless we properly understand the problem, we cannot

design effective solutions.”

Edward Davey, Secretary of State for Climate Change, September 2012