Central Bank Case Swiss

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    1/13

    C E N T R A L B A N K S C A S E S T U D Y

    R E P O R T I I : Switzerland

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    2/13

    C E N T R A L B A N K S C A S E S T U D Y

    SwitzerlandThis report, prepared by GFMS for the World Gold

    Council, is the second one of a series of publications

    intended to investigate the practice of a select group

    of countries, with respect to the management oftheir gold reserves.

    Specifically, the objective is to examine the variety

    of factors that have influenced the reserve manage-

    ment decisions of the institutions involved.

    Moreover, the aim of these reports is to consider

    the broader economic and political backdrop of

    the respective countries that has influenced the

    decisions taken by central banks and other relevant

    decision makers. Finally, these reports provide an

    outlook on further developments that might occur

    within the countries under review in the short to

    medium term.

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    3/13

    Switzerland

    1: Country background

    Political background

    Switzerland is a federal republic consisting of

    26 cantons and a parliamentary democracy,

    with the Federal Council of Switzerland thehead of government. The government exercis-

    es executive power while legislative power is

    shared among the parliament, comprising thetwo chambers of the Federal Assembly of

    Switzerland, the Council of States and theNational Council, and the electorate directly.

    With regards to the direct participation of the

    electorate, the Swiss legislative system operatesunder a form of direct democracy. Specifically,

    changes in the countrys constitution require a

    referendum to take place, while any citizen canrequest a constitutional amendment by collect-

    ing the signatures of 100,000 voters within aperiod of 18 months. Furthermore, citizenscan challenge a law that has been passed by

    the parliament, by simply collecting 50,000

    voters signatures within 100 days from thepassing of the law. As discussed later in this

    report, this bore great significance in the mat-

    ter of the Swiss gold sales that took place overthe first few years of the millennium.

    Economic background

    Switzerland enjoys a sound and stable economy

    providing its citizens with a high standard of liv-ing. The countrys GDP per capita is higher than

    that of most European Union (EU) countries.

    The chart below provides a comparisonbetween the GDP per capita of Switzerland and

    those of the top five EU countries (based on

    their per capita GDP), illustrating that, from this

    group, only Luxembourg and Ireland enjoy higherfigures than Switzerland.

    Although the country is neither a member ofthe EU nor of the European Economic Area

    Agreement (EEAA), Switzerland maintains a

    close relationship with the EU, defined by aseries of bilateral agreements, dubbedBilaterals, in place since June 2002. It is worth

    noting that since then Switzerland has enteredinto a second round of negotiations calledBilaterals II, intended to further enhance links

    between the country and the EU.

    Industry and trade/services are the two most

    important components of the Swiss economy.Exports of goods and services overall in 2007

    accounted for nearly 57% of the countrys GDP1.

    With the exception of agricultural protection-ism, the country overall operates under very lib-

    eral trade and foreign investment policies.

    Finally, the stability and high level of privacy of the

    banking regime in Switzerland make it one of the

    most secure investment havens in the world.

    Switzerland has thus established itself as theleading offshore money manager worldwide.

    1Source: Eurostat - Structural Indicators database (forecast), Feb 2008

    *

    *The volume index of GDP per capita in Purchasing Power Standards (PPS) is expressed in relation to the European Union (EU-27) average setto equal 100. If the index of a country is higher than 100, this country's level of GDP per head is higher than the EU average and vice versa.

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    4/13

    2: Historical Structure ofSwiss Official Reserves

    Switzerland has long been a major holder of

    bullion. IMF data dating back to 1948 indicate that

    from then until the second half of 2007 holdingsremained above 1,200 tonnes peaking at 2,745

    tonnes in 1967.

    In addition to having always been of significant

    volume in absolute terms, Switzerlands gold

    reserves have also historically accounted for amajor portion of the countrys overall reserves. The

    accompanying graph features a breakdown of the

    different components of Swiss reserves, and the

    percentage of overall reserves gold accounted forat market prices, on an end-year basis since 1970.

    After rising somewhat during the 1970s, driven by

    a concurrently rising gold price, golds percentagepeaked at 82% towards the end of 1980. Since

    then golds share of reserves has fallen, partly as

    the price declined and more recently due to thefirst Swiss gold sales programme that commenced

    in May 2000. In March 2005, which marked the

    end of the sales programme, gold accounted for24% of total reserves, although since then it has

    risen to 41%, in spite of the second sales pro-

    gramme. This increase has been driven by both therelease of proceeds from the sales of gold bullion

    from official reserves, so they are distributed

    among the federal government and cantons, andthe effect of a rising gold price on the value of

    remaining gold reserves.

    With regards to Switzerlands foreign exchange

    and other reserves, it is worth noting that, at

    $45 billion (at end-2007, source: IMF), theserepresent a significant volume, taking into

    account the size of the country and its status as

    a healthy developed economy with a solidcurrency. For instance, comparing the size of

    Switzerlands reserves excluding gold to those

    of the EU-15 countries, only the United

    Kingdom and France have larger absolute hold-

    ings than Switzerland, even though Switzerland

    ranks ninth in GDP terms and 12th in popula-tion terms among the 16 countries examined.

    3. The Swiss NationalBank as an Asset Manager

    With regards to its asset management guide-

    lines and activities, the Swiss National Bank (SNB)

    is one of the most flexible entities within theofficial sector. Where other banks reserves

    include little more than gold and a limited selec-

    tion of currencies, the SNB is allowed to trade ina wide range of assets. Specifically, according

    to the Investment Policy Guidelines of the Swiss

    National Bank (SNB) (27th May 2004, amended29th September 2005), the central bank can

    include the following assets in its portfolio:

    Fixed income securities

    Bonds listed on a stock exchange or traded

    on an organised market that regularlypublishes prices (includes corporate bonds)

    Bonds of Swiss companies are not eligible, to

    C E N T R A L B A N K S C A S E S T U D Y

    Source: IMF , LBMA; Gold prices at market prices

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    5/13

    avoid market distortions and conflictsof interest

    Short-term, non-tradeable investments

    Time deposits placed with the Bank for

    International Settlements (BIS) or banks that

    meet certain risk criteria

    Repos and reverse repos with counterparties

    that meet certain risk criteria

    Equities

    Shares of foreign companies that meet

    certain criteria

    Swiss shares are not eligible, for similarreasons to bonds of Swiss companies

    Gold

    The SNB is obliged by the Swiss Federal

    Constitution to hold part of its reserves in

    gold, stored both in Switzerland and abroad

    Part of the SNBs gold holdings can be lent out

    Currencies

    Includes Swiss francs, euros, US dollars,Canadian dollars, Danish kroner, British

    pounds and yen

    Derivatives on the above mentioned

    instruments

    Includes interest rate futures, equity indexfutures, interest rate swaps, options on gold

    and currencies, and forward foreign exchange

    transactions

    It is worth noting that a number of additional

    restrictions exist for some of the above men-

    tioned asset classes, but these are largely notrelevant to the purposes of this report. With

    regards to the composition of Swiss reserves,

    the table below provides a breakdown of thecountrys reserves (excluding gold), by currency

    denomination and instrument type.

    Composition of Forex & BondReserves of Switzerland at end-2006

    FOREIGN SWISSEXCHANGE FRANC

    CURRENCY ALLOCATION

    Swiss Franc - 100%

    US dollar 27% -

    Euro 48% -

    Pound sterling 10% -

    Other 15% -

    INVESTMENT CATEGORIES

    Money Market Investments 3% -

    Government bonds 58% 48%

    Other bonds 29% 52%

    Equities 11% -

    Source: SNB Annual Report 2006

    4. Gold Sales in 2000-5

    BackgroundIn February 1997, the Economic Committee of

    the National Council decided that gold hold-

    ings of the SNB should be demonetised. Atthat stage, the requirement that 40% of the

    Swiss franc note issue be backed by gold valued

    at a fixed rate of exchange was scrapped, andreplaced with a 25% requirement. The issue of

    further demonetisation, including a revaluationof the reserves, started to gain the attention ofthe wider public.

    Later the same year, the President of theConfederation proposed that part of any

    revaluation gains (at that stage gold was valued

    at around one-third of the market price) shouldbe used to fund the Swiss Foundation forSolidarity, a foundation intended to provide

    assistance to persons in need in Switzerlandand abroad. The idea was largely fuelled by the

    controversy surrounding the Swiss banking

    Switzerland

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    6/13

    systems activities in World War II and its deal-ings with the German government of the time.

    It was suggested that the initial contribution to

    the foundation should take the form of theproceeds from the revaluation of 500 tonnes of

    gold, to be donated by the SNB.

    A group of experts, established to examine

    revisions to the countrys monetary laws,

    recommended in 1997 that Switzerland sell1,400 tonnes of its gold reserves. At the time,

    the government and the SNB did not fully agree

    with the expert groups suggestion andproposed instead that sales should be limited

    to the 500 tonnes initially suggested to fund

    the Swiss Foundation for Solidarity.

    In April 2000, a series of constitutional revisions

    were put to the public vote and approved bythe Swiss electorate, to be effective from 1st

    January 2000. Amongst these was the aboli-

    tion of the requirement that 25% of the Swissfranc note issue be backed by gold valued at

    the official price.

    In May 1999, the Swiss parliament had proposed

    a new Federal Law on Currency and Payment

    Instruments that would further sever the link

    between the Swiss franc and gold, by abolish-ing the minimum gold coverage of banknotes

    in circulation and the gold parity of the

    countrys currency. The law was adopted bythe parliament in December of the same year

    and became effective on 1st May 2000, after

    the 100-day window for the public to challengeit with a referendum had passed.

    The passing of this law and the demonetisationof the SNBs gold reserves that it represented

    essentially provided the Swiss government with

    the legal framework for gold sales to beapproved. Indeed, at the time the government

    enacted the necessary legislation for the SNB to

    be allowed to sell 1,300 tonnes of gold,

    accounting for a little more than 50% of thecountrys gold reserves. The SNB clarified its

    intention to minimise the impact on the gold

    market of its activities, through gradual salesinto the market.

    On 1st May 2000, the first gold sales programmeof the SNB finally commenced. The programme

    was concluded in March 2005, leaving the SNB

    with holdings of 1,290 tonnes. In accordancewith the SNBs announced intentions, these

    sales took place gradually over the period,

    through daily sales in the spot market and thelimited use of gold derivatives.

    Finally it is important to note that from end-

    September 1999, the SNB had been part of the

    first Central Bank Gold Agreement (CBGA), alsoknown as the Washington Agreement on Gold.

    The accord limited gold sales from a group of

    15 European central banks, including theEuropean Central Bank (ECB), over the following

    five years to a total of 2,000 tonnes, or approx-

    imately 400 tonnes over each 12-month periodstarting from 27th September 1999 and running

    through to 26th September 2004. After the

    expiry of the first CBGA, a second five-yearagreement started, to which the SNB was also a

    member, with a higher sales limit of 2,500

    tonnes for its duration or 500 tonnes annually.

    C E N T R A L B A N K S C A S E S T U D Y

    Source: IMF

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    7/13

    In addition to limiting gold sales by the signato-ries, the two CBGAs also placed restrictions on

    the central banks activities in gold derivatives

    as well as gold lending.

    What were the reasons forselling gold?

    The principal reason for the SNB to sell part of its

    gold reserves stemmed from the requirementfor the central bank to modernise its balance

    sheet, by reducing the volume of officialreserves and changing their composition. At

    the time when the sales were decided, the

    countrys official reserves stood at exceptionallyhigh levels, considering the size of the Swiss

    economy, the countrys population, and its status

    as a G10 country with a stable currency andhealthy economy. It therefore arguably made

    sense for part of the reserves to be liquidated

    and the profits to be distributed or used in oneway or another.

    Looking at the part of the reserves that the SNBcould mobilise, the Swiss franc denominatedassets were at too low a level to liquidate, while

    a transfer of foreign reserves could have had a

    negative impact on the banks operations.

    Furthermore, the changes in the countrys

    domestic monetary arrangements ended the

    requirement that previously existed for allcurrency notes issued to be backed by physical

    gold valued at the official price (which in thefew years leading to the time when sales weredecided had kept to around one-third of the

    market price). The revaluation of the Swiss gold

    reserves this change brought about made itapparent how overweight the country had

    been in gold, valued at market prices. Indeed,

    using indicators such as the value of gold/GDPunit, value of gold/imports, quantity of gold per

    capita and value of gold/currency in circulation,and using gold at market value, Switzerlandemerged as the largest holder of gold world-

    wide at the end of the 1990s.

    With regards to the controversy overSwitzerlands banking record during World War

    II, and the suggestion by the government to

    endow its proposed Swiss Foundation for

    Solidaritywith the proceeds from the disposal of

    500 tonnes of the countrys gold reserves, thesefactors certainly helped accelerate themovement towards gold sales. Wider political

    Switzerland

    Source: IMF, Eurostat

    Source: IMF, Eurostat

    Gold Reserves:

    Top-5 EU Countries and Switzerland, end 1999

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    8/13

    considerations therefore appear to have hadsome influence on the debate. Nevertheless,

    one cannot conclude that such external pres-

    sures were a reason per se for the adoption of agold sales programme. Indeed, discussions over

    the SNBs excessive gold reserves had

    emerged within Switzerland, prior to the coun-try having come under international scrutiny

    over its financial dealings with the wartime

    German government. For instance, the early1990s had seen suggestions for the countrys

    gold reserves to be used to control the govern-

    ment budget deficit, which was ballooning atthe time. Similarly, although the prospect of

    obtaining resources for domestic expenditure

    through the sale of the SNB gold was supportedin some quarters, it would be misleading to

    assume that this was the original or unique driv-

    er of the sales that eventually took place.

    It is important to understand that a case could

    be made for gold sales independently of the wayin which any profits would be used. From a sim-

    ple portfolio allocation point of view there was a

    strong argument to reduce gold holdings. Giventhe exceptionally high level of Swiss gold hold-

    ings in the late 1990s, switching away from gold

    and into assets that can provide a higher level of

    return and are more liquid was likely to improvethe performance of the overall reserve portfolio.

    What methods were chosento sell the gold?

    The SNB initially commissioned the BIS to sell itsgold on its behalf, and then, from April 2001

    onwards it undertook the operation itself. The

    gold was released through regular sales of rela-tively small amounts. Available evidence indi-

    cates that this gold was sold into the private

    market, rather than through any off-markettransactions with, say, other central banks.

    Regarding the portion of the gold sold throughthe BIS (220 tonnes), while we are not certain of

    the exact instruments used by the BIS and their

    immediate counterparties, public statements byofficials of the SNB, coupled with the limits set

    by the CBGA on gold derivative activities, seem

    to suggest that the gold was either sold in thespot market or through short-term derivatives.

    Of the remaining 1,080 tonnes, 730 were solddirectly in the spot market, using 25 counterpar-

    ties in four different continents. In an effort to

    receive consistently competitive pricing, SNBtraders were allowed to perform two-way

    trading. Specifically, they were allowed to buy

    gold on an intra-day basis, amounting to up totwo-thirds of their daily-allocated sales volume.

    Overall, daily sales were normally set to approxi-

    mately one tonne, and the Bank of England wasused for the physical settlement of these spot

    transactions.

    In addition, the SNB sold 350 tonnes of its

    reserves through options programmes. These

    were typically structured so that a buyer wouldcommit to buy 50 tonnes of gold over a period

    of several months, paying the daily average of

    the AM and PM London fixes, plus a premium. In

    order to achieve a somewhat higher premium,the SNB offered to cap the maximum selling

    price. In essence, this structure comprised the

    bank selling the gold on a spot basis and at thesame time writing out-of-the-money call

    options. It should be stressed here that, in

    choosing the aforementioned price-cap levels(in other words, the options strike prices), the

    SNB remained prudent throughout the period

    of the sales. On the one hand, this resulted inthe options only being exercised on two occa-

    sions and, on the other, the bank only received

    modest premiums over the gold price, varyingbetween $1.40 and $3.50 per ounce.

    C E N T R A L B A N K S C A S E S T U D Y

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    9/13

    Finally it is worth noting that, although nothedging their gold price risk over the period, the

    SNB did hedge the currency risk associated with

    the expected proceeds of the sale (related tofluctuations in the US dollar:Swiss franc rate).

    Initially, 20% of the expected proceeds were

    hedged, while from December 2000 onwards,35% of the expected proceeds were hedged.

    This strategy augmented the return from the

    SNB gold sales, as gold maintained a reasonablecorrelation with the US$:CHF rate over much of

    the May 2000 March 2005 period (the corre-

    lation coefficient in daily log-returns wascalculated at 0.42).

    Why did the SNB choose thesemethods to sell the gold?

    The principal goal the SNB wished to achieve

    using its chosen strategy was to receive the best

    price for its gold, or at least a good price. Thecentral bank concluded that a discreet and non-

    public method of sales would be the best

    approach to achieve this objective.

    With regards to the SNBs decision to offload its

    gold through regular sales of limited volume, thiswas mainly driven by its intention not to put too

    much pressure on the gold price. As Jean Pierre

    Roth, governor of the central bank said: The

    Swiss National Bank has no interest in adopting astrategy which would push the gold price down.

    We know that 1,300 tonnes of gold cannot beabsorbed by the market in a short period of

    time. We therefore are considering distributing

    the sales over a period of several years. 2

    The central banks initial decision to use the BIS

    as an intermediary for its gold sales was made ata time when the SNB had little recent experi-

    ence in the gold market and no internal capabil-

    ity or capacity to perform the required opera-tions directly with the market. The BIS, in

    contrast, had developed considerable expertise

    in releasing official sector gold into the marketand in generally acting as an intermediary for

    central banks in their dealings with the market.

    Furthermore, the important influence the BIShad on the setting up of the first CBGA made it

    the obvious candidate to take up this role.

    Nevertheless, from April 2001, at which pointthe SNB had acquired the necessary resources

    and contacts in the gold market (including

    bringing in experienced personnel from thecommercial sector), the central bank started to

    perform trading operations in-house.

    With regards to the choice of spot transactions

    and the alternative options structures described

    in the previous section, the SNB did not haveaccess to instruments such as longer dated for-

    ward sales and other derivatives and combina-

    tions of these instruments, because the CBGAlimited its signatories activities in the gold

    derivatives market. As a result, the SNB could

    not hedge its price risk for the entire period.

    Nevertheless, the CBGA did not place anyrestrictions on foreign exchange derivatives, so

    the SNB did hedge the currency risk of part of

    the expected proceeds.

    How were the proceeds of thesale distributed

    By end-March 2005, the proceeds from the

    sales of the SNB gold had reached CHF 21.1bn

    Switzerland

    2 A view on Switzerland in the run up to the demonetisation of gold, Speech by Jean-Pierre Roth Vice Chairman of the GoverningBoard Swiss National Bank, at the 22nd Annual FT World Gold Conference, London, 14 June 1999; Page 6

    3 Philipp M Hildebrand: SNB gold sales - lessons and experiences, Speech by Dr Philipp M Hildebrand, Member of the GoverningBoard of the Swiss National Bank, at the Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC, 5 May 2005; Page 3

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    10/13

    ($17.6bn), equivalent to an average selling priceof $351.40, $17.20 higher than the average PM

    fix over the sales period3. The proposal to appro-

    priate part of the proceeds from the gold salesfor the proposed Swiss Foundation for Solidarity

    was introduced twice over the course of the

    sales programme, once in September 2002 andthen subsequently in December 2004. The

    September 2002 proposal was for one-third of

    the proceeds to be earmarked for the fundingof the Swiss social-security programme, a

    further third to be allocated to regional govern-

    ments and the balance dedicated to helpingpeople in need abroad (in line with the original

    goals of the Foundation). The second proposal

    floated in December 2004 involved two-thirdsof the proceeds being put into the state old-age

    pension fund, with the balance distributed to

    the cantons.

    On both occasions the proposals were rejected,

    the former through a referendum, while the lat-ter was turned down by the Council of States. It

    was thus finally decided in February 2005 that

    proceeds would be distributed according to theexisting law, namely with the allocation of one-

    third of the sales proceeds to the Confederation

    and the remaining two-thirds to the 26 cantons.

    Subsequently, it was decided that in the first halfof 2007 the Confederations share would be

    transferred in several tranches to the state old-

    age pension fund.

    5. The Second SalesProgrammes

    On 14th June 2007, the SNB announced their

    plan to sell an additional 250 tonnes of gold

    under the remainder of the second CBGA. Bythe end of that year, the central bank had

    released 145 tonnes into the market through

    regular sales amounting to, initially a little over30 tonnes monthly and later around 10 tonnes

    per month. In contrast to the first sales

    programme, there is no intention for the pro-ceeds of the sales to be used in any project, nor

    for them to be distributed to the federal of can-

    tonal governments. The original announce-ment of the programme in fact explicitly stated

    that the SNB would sell 250 tonnes of gold and

    increase its foreign exchange reserves by a cor-responding amount and that the overall level

    of currency [including gold] reserves will remain

    unchanged.

    6. The Future of Swiss

    Gold ReservesLooking ahead, after completing its ongoingsales programme, it is highly unlikely that the

    SNB will sell further portions of its gold reserves,

    at least in the medium term. Starting with thearguments that were put forward for sales in the

    1990s, these are far less applicable given the

    current state of the Swiss reserves. Although

    still a significant holder, Switzerland has ceasedto look as overweight in gold as it did in the late

    1990s. In addition, having more than halved the

    C E N T R A L B A N K S C A S E S T U D Y

    Source: IMF

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    11/13

    The Philippines

    allocation in the metal through its two sales pro-grammes, it could be argued that now would

    not be the best time for the country to under-

    take further sales, with all the logistical andpolitical implications these would involve.

    Furthermore, an important element of themotivation for the sales programme of 2000-

    2005 was the transfer of part of the substantial

    official reserves of the country from the centralbank to the government, because of the

    reduced need for a country like Switzerland to

    hold such large reserves. These reserves are cur-rently significantly lower (when adjusted for

    inflation) and this is on the basis of a current

    gold price well above its historical average. Itwould thus make little sense to distribute any

    part of these proceeds.

    On the potential for further sales of gold serving

    portfolio reallocation purposes (similar to those

    of the second programme), one would expectthat if there were any such intention for the

    medium term, the SNB would have simply

    added these to the 250 tonnes they intend tosell until September 2009.

    Moreover, one should not forget that from the

    early stages of its effort to demonetise its gold,the SNB stressed that gold remained an impor-

    tant asset on its balance sheet. This view of the

    central bank is perhaps best illustrated by thewords of Jean Pierre Roth: Once the [first] sales

    programme has come to an end, gold will con-

    tinue to play an important role in our monetaryreserves. The recent revision of the Constitution

    has led to the stipulation that we should main-

    tain "sufficient" gold reserves. The fact that this

    precision was introduced at the initiative of our

    parliament indicates that the Swiss people wish

    to keep ample gold reserves. 4

    Finally it is also important to note that this was

    stated in the late 1990s, when there was grow-ing scepticism within the central banking world

    toward holding an asset that was perceived as

    having a low yield and limited liquidity and wasdeclining in value. The price rally in recent

    years, coupled with the changing global political

    scene and the relative decline of the US dollar,have brought about a definite shift in senti-

    ment, with some people in the central banking

    community reconsidering the role of gold inreserves, especially as a politically neutral instru-

    ment of diversification. This opinion was in fact

    clearly put across in a speech by PhilippHildebrand, a Member of the Governing Board

    of the Swiss National Bank, at the LBMA

    Conference in Montreux on 26th June 2006.

    At the same time, one cannot rule out the pos-

    sibility that in the longer term the Swiss centralbank could return as a seller of gold. For

    instance, should the general attitude towards

    the yellow metal revert to that seen over the

    1990s, or if renewed calls for mobilisation of theSwiss official reserves should somehow emerge,

    further SNB sales would not be inconceivable.

    After all, the country remains one of the largestholders of gold worldwide in terms of both per

    capita and also per unit of GDP. Nevertheless, as

    was stressed above, it is unlikely that we will seethis happen in the short to medium-term.

    4 A view on Switzerland in the run up to the demonetisation of gold, Speech by Jean-Pierre Roth Vice Chairman of the Governing

    Board Swiss National Bank, at the 22nd Annual FT World Gold Conference, London, 14 June 1999; Page 6

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    12/13

    Disclaimer

    This report is published by the World Gold Council (WGC), 55 Old Broad Street, London EC2M 1RX,

    United Kingdom. Copyright 2008. All rights reserved. This report is the property of WGC and is

    protected by U.S. and international laws of copyright, trademark and other intellectual property laws.

    This report is provided solely for general information and educational purposes. The information in

    this report is based upon information generally available to the public from sources believed to be

    reliable. WGC does not undertake to update or advise of changes to the information in this report.

    Expression of opinion are those of the author and are subject to change without notice.

    The information in this report is provided as an as is basis. WGC makes no express or implied rep-

    resentation or warranty of any kind concerning the information in this report, including, without lim-

    itation, (i) any representation or warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or use,or (ii) any representation or warranty as to accuracy, completeness, reliability or timeliness. Without

    limiting any of the foregoing, in no event will WGC or its affiliates be liable for any decision made or

    action taken in reliance on the information in this report and, in any event, WGC and its affiliates shall

    not be liable for any consequential, special, punitive, incidental, indirect or similar damages arising

    from, related or connected with this report, even it notified of the possibility of such damages.

    No part of this report may be copied, reproduced, republished, sold, distributed, transmitted, circu-

    lated, modified, displayed or otherwise used for any purpose whatsoever, including, without limita-

    tion, as a basis for preparing derivative works, without the prior written authorization of WGC. To

    request such authorization, contact [email protected]. In no event may WGC trademarks, artworkor other proprietary elements in this report be reproduced separately from the textual content asso-

    ciated with them; use of these may be requested from [email protected].

    This report is not, and should not be construed as, an offer to buy or sell, or as a solicitation of an

    offer to buy or sell, gold, any gold related products or any other products, securities or investments.

    This report does not, and should not be construed as acting to, sponsor, advocate, endorse or pro-

    mote gold, any gold related products or any other products, securities or investments.

    This report does not purport to make any recommendations or provide any investment or other

    advice with respect to the purchase, sale or other disposition of gold, any gold related products or

    any other products, securities or investments, including, without limitation, any advice to the effect

    that any gold related transaction is appropriate for any investment objective or financial situation of

    a prospective investor. A decision to invest in gold, any gold related products or any other products,

    securities or investments should not be made in reliance on any of the statements in this report.

    Before making any investment decision, prospective investors should seek advice from their financial

    advisers, take into account their individual financial needs and circumstances and carefully consider

    the risks associated with such investment decision.

    C E N T R A L B A N K C A S E S T U D I E S

  • 7/29/2019 Central Bank Case Swiss

    13/13

    World Gold Council

    55 Old Broad Street

    London, EC2M 1RX

    United Kingdom

    www.gold.org