centerless-ground_parts.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/28/2019 centerless-ground_parts.pdf

    1/9

    41. CENTERLESS-GROUND PARTS

    41.1. THE PROCESS

    Centerless grinding is an abrasive method for finish-machining cylindrical

    surfaces. Workpieces are unmounted but pass between two opposed

    grinding wheels. There are several variations of the process:

    In through-feed grinding the part passes axially between the main grinding

    wheel and the regulating wheel; a metal blade supports the workpiece at the

    correct height. This method is limited to cylindrical parts without heads,

    shoulders, or other projections that would prevent through movement of the

    part between the wheels. It is illustrated schematically in Fig. 4.14.1.

    Infeed grinding differs from through-feed grinding in that the workpiece

    does not move axially during grinding and in that the grinding wheel may be

    dressed to the shape to which the part is to be ground. The process is

    comparable with plunge or form grinding on a cylindrical grinder. The

    grinding wheel is fed into the work and retracts for workpiece removal. The

    infeed method is not quite as rapid as through-feed grinding. (See Fig.

    4.14.2.)

    CENTERLESS-GROUND PARTS

    http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001?UserEmailParamInPdfDownloadController=rameshsmit@gmail.com#p13n-login-panelhttp://accessengineeringlibrary.com/http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001#p2000af109964_164002http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001#p2000af109964_163001http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001?UserEmailParamInPdfDownloadController=rameshsmit@gmail.com#p13n-login-panelhttp://accessengineeringlibrary.com/
  • 7/28/2019 centerless-ground_parts.pdf

    2/9

    Figure 4.14.1. Through-feed centerless grinding.

    Figure 4.14.2. Infeed centerless grinding. (Courtesy Cincinnati

    Milacron.)

    Figure 4.14.3. End-feed centerless grinding. (Courtesy Cincinnati

    Milacron.)

    End-feed grinding is used for tapered work. Either the grinding wheel or the

    regulating wheel or both are dressed to the proper taper. The workpiece is

    fed axially to a fixed end stop. Figure 4.14.3 illustrates the process.

    Internal centerless grinding is used for ring- and sleeve-shaped parts. The

    workpiece is supported between three rolls, which establish its location and

    cause it to rotate. An internal grinding wheel removes stock. Since the part is

    located from its outside surface, the ground inner surface is nearly perfectly

    concentric with the outside.

    41.2. TYPICAL APPLICATIONS

    http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001#p2000af109964_164001
  • 7/28/2019 centerless-ground_parts.pdf

    3/9

    The centerless-grinding method can be applied to solid parts with diameters

    as small as 0.1 mm (0.004 in) and as large as 175 mm (7 in). Rings and tubing

    somewhat larger250 mm (10 in)can be centerless-ground with equipment

    currently available. Parts as short as 10 mm (0.4 in) and as long as 5 m (16 ft)

    are centerless-ground.

    Centerless grinding produces accurate cylindrical surfaces. The method is

    ideally suited for pins, shafts, and rings when close-tolerance outside

    diameters, precise roundness, and smooth surfaces or all three are required.

    Long, slender parts that would be subject to deflection in conventional

    cylindrical grinding can be ground accurately by the centerless method.

    Screw threads also can be ground with this process.

    For through-feed grinding, the surface to be ground must be a straight

    cylinder. If the part has two or more diameters, only the largest can be

    ground with the through-feed method. Figure 4.14.4 shows a variety of parts

    ground with the through-feed centerless method.

    The infeed method is slightly slower but possesses the advantage of having

    the capability of producing multidiameter or formed surfaces. Tapered parts

    or parts with steps are ground with this method. Valve tappets, arbors, yoke

    pins, shackle bolts, and distributor shafts are typical examples.

    http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001#p2000af109964_165001
  • 7/28/2019 centerless-ground_parts.pdf

    4/9

    Figure 4.14.4. A variety of parts produced with through-feed

    centerless grinding. (Courtesy Cincinnati Milacron.)

    41.3. ECONOMIC PRODUCTION QUANTITIES

    Centerless grinding is primarily a mass-production process. It combines high

    output levels with the precision of finished dimensions.

    Short parts processed by the through-feed method and using an automatic

    magazine or hopper feed can be centerless-ground at rates as high as 6000

    pieces per hour. Times may be considerably longer for end-feed or infeed

    processed parts, particularly the latter when larger diameters, greater stock

    removals, or multiple diameters are involved. For infeed grinding, a rate of 30

    to 240 pieces per hour is more typical. For through-feed grinding, production

    rates are more easily stated in terms of length processed per minute. Rates

    range from 1 to 4 m/min (3 to 12 ft/min) per pass to as much as 9 m/min (30

  • 7/28/2019 centerless-ground_parts.pdf

    5/9

    ft/min) per pass. From one to six passes may be involved.

    Centerless grinding is more rapid than conventional cylindrical grinding

    because loading and unloading time is much shorter. There is also no need

    for drilling center holes on the ends of the workpiece.

    Setup times for centerless grinding range from a few minutes to as much as 4h, depending on the changes required and the machine used. Sometimes a

    change in the material being ground may require more setup time than a

    workpiece change because it may entail changes in wheels and coolant.

    Job shops can group lots of parts of like material and nearly the same

    diameter and economically process lots of 100 pieces or less. Justification for

    centerless grinding in comparison with center-type cylindrical grinding

    depends on the availability of equipment and wheels and other tooling and

    the complexity of the parts to be ground. Single-diameter parts can be

    ground as easily with the centerless method as with center-type grinding if

    quantities are 10 to 25 or more. Complex parts may require quantities of

    1000 or more to justify the centerless approach.

    41.4. SUITABLE MATERIALS

    Centerless grinding has the same broad range capability for processing

    various materials as the other grinding processes have. However, there is

    one bonus with centerless grinding: brittle, fragile, and easily distorted parts

    and materials are more suitable for centerless than for conventional center-

    type cylindrical grinding. With the centerless method, parts are supported

    along all or most of their length, and there is no end pressure or deflection

    from wheel pressure. This makes the grinding of glass, porcelain, rubber,plastics, cork, and other brittle or easily distorted materials more practical on

    centerless equipment.

    For comments on the suitability of most materials to grinding methods in

    general, see Chap. 4.15, Flat-Ground Surfaces.

    41.5. DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS

    The following suggestions should be kept in mind by the designers wishing

    to take maximum advantage of the centerless-grinding approach.

    http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_171001#p2000af109974_171001
  • 7/28/2019 centerless-ground_parts.pdf

    6/9

  • 7/28/2019 centerless-ground_parts.pdf

    7/9

    Figure 4.14.7. Parts with irregular surfaces can-not be longer than

    the width of the grinding wheel unless both infeed and through-feed

    are used and the part is stepped in one direction as shown.

    square, nearly square, or round ends. The included angle of a pointed end

    should be 120 or less. (See Fig. 4.14.8.)

    5. As with cylindrical grinding, it is best to avoid fillets and radii and instead

    use undercut or relief surfaces. This eliminates difficult wheel dressing when

    there is a fillet. (See Figs. 4.13.2aand 4.13.5.) When radii or fillets are used,

    they should be as large as possible, and on any one part all of them should

    be the same size to simplify wheel dressing.

    6. When a part is designed for form centerless grinding (infeed method), the

    form should be as simple as possible to reduce wheel dressing and other

    costs.

    7. If accuracy is critical, avoid keyways, flats, holes, and other interruptions

    to the surface to be ground or make them as small as possible. (See Fig.

    4.13.3.)

    http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_157001#p2000af109964_161001http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_157001#p2000af109964_162001http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_157001#p2000af109964_160001http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001#p2000af109964_168001
  • 7/28/2019 centerless-ground_parts.pdf

    8/9

    Figure 4.14.8. Do not design the ends of centerless-ground parts to

    have ground surfaces unless infeed grinding is used and the end

    surface has an included angle of less than 120.

    8. If a flat is necessary at the end of a shaft to provide a surface against

    which a setscrew is to be tightened or for some other reason, and if

    tolerances are tight, it is preferable to put flats on opposite sides of the part.

    This prevents the tendency for a high spot to develop opposite the flat.

    Another remedy is to retain a full cylindrical section at the end of the shaft.

    (See Fig. 4.14.9.)

    Figure 4.14.9. When interruptions are unavoidable, balance them if

    possible or provide full cylindrical surfaces on both sides.

    41.6. DIMENSIONAL FACTORS

    Like other grinding methods, centerless grinding can be extremely accurateif all conditions are correct. These conditions include the condition of the

    equipment, particularly wheel-spindle bearings, the use of the proper wheel

    and coolant, and the evenness of the temperature of the workpiece, machine,

    and coolant.

    Roundness control in centerless grinding is remarkably good even though

    the part does not rotate about a fixed center. The reason for this is the

    geometry of the setup of grinding wheel, regulating wheel, and workpiece

    support, which, if correct, systematically cause the grinding action to remove

    the high spots of a part as it is rotated against the wheels.

    Another favorable factor in centerless grinding is the fact that the setting of

    the grinding wheel affects the diameter of the workpiece rather than the

    radius from its center point, as in conventional cylindrical grinding. Thus a

    factor of 2 is involved in the accuracy of wheel settings.

    Table 4.14.1 presents recommendations for dimensional tolerances for

    production centerless grinding.

    http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001#p2000af109964_169001http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001#p2000af109964_168002
  • 7/28/2019 centerless-ground_parts.pdf

    9/9

    Copyright McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved.

    Customer Privacy Notice. Any use is subject to the Terms of Use, Privacy Notice and

    copyright information.

    For further information about this site, contact us.

    Designed and built using Scolaris by Semantico.

    This product incorporates part of the open source Protg system. Protg is

    available at http://protege.stanford.edu//

    Table 4.14.1. Recommended Dimensional Tolerances for Centerless

    Ground Parts

    Recommended tolerance

    Dimension Normal Tight

    Diameter 0.0125 mm (0.0005 in) 0.0025 mm (0.0001

    in)

    Parallelism 0.0125 mm (0.0005 in) 0.0025 mm (0.0001

    in)

    Surface finish 0.20 m (8 in) 0.05 m (2 in)

    Citation

    James G.Bralla: Design for Manufacturability Handbook, Second Edition.

    CENTERLESS-GROUND PARTS, Chapter (McGraw-Hill Professional, 1999, 1986),

    AccessEngineering

    EXPORT

    http://protege.stanford.edu/http://www.theiet.org/inspechttp://www.semantico.com/http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/contacthttp://accessengineeringlibrary.com/privacy-noticehttp://accessengineeringlibrary.com/terms-and-conditionshttp://accessengineeringlibrary.com/ris/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001http://accessengineeringlibrary.com/browse/design-for-manufacturability-handbook-second-edition/p2000af109974_163001