Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Extended abstract TAPPI Nanotechnology 2010, Espoo Printed electrodes on tailored paper enable electrochemical functionalization of paper Jouko Peltonen1, Anni Määttänen1, Roger Bollström1, Martti Toivakka1, Ulriika Mattinen2, Milena Stępień1, Johan Bobacka2, Jarkko Saarinen1, Petri Ihalainen1
1Center of Excellence for Functional Materials (FunMat), Laboratory of Paper Coating and Converting, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland 2 Process Chemistry Centre, Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland Currently most of the applications of printed functionality are established on plastic films. However, the recyclability of such devices is poor. A more sustainable alternative is to use paper as the printing substrate. For example, a thin, lightweight, and foldable thermochromic display has been realized on a regular copy paper [1]. It has also been shown that a transistor can be realized on a paper substrate by an all-printing process [2]. The barrier and printability properties of such a paper substrate are controlled by separate coating layers. The choice of the pigment as well as the thickness (0.5-10 µm) and porosity of the top coating together with the barrier layer underneath the top coating provide controlled sorption and printability properties. Electrodes printed on this kind of a paper substrate can be applied in liquid environment for electrochemical applications. In the first case study, we demonstrate electrochemical polymerization of Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) doped with chloride (PEDOT-Cl) on paper with printed silver (Ag)/polyaniline (PANI) as a working electrode. During galvanostatic deposition, the potential of the electrode was measured at a constant current density (0.08 mA/cm2). The potential-time transient curve for printed Ag/PANI electrode showed three different regions. An initiation region, where potential changed sharply with time, corresponded to the charging of the double layer (including oxidation of PANI) and the formation of PEDOT-Cl nuclei [3]. The growth of the polymer layer continued in the second region where the potential remained approximately constant at about 0.98 V. This initial time-potential transient was similar to that observed for electropolymerization of PEDOT-Cl on platinum [4]. In the third phase the potential slowly increased with time up till the end of the experiment. The quality of the deposited PEDOT-Cl film was analyzed by AFM and ToF-SIMS. As a second case study, electrochemical actuation of liquids by an external electric field (electrowetting) is shown. In electrowetting, one is generally dealing with droplets of partially wetting liquids on planar solid substrates. In most applications of interest, the droplets are aqueous salt solutions [5, 6]. In another approach, an electric field may also be used to modify the surface energy of the substrate on which a drop of liquid is brought. Chibowski et al. have shown that surface energy of minerals, e.g. CaCO3 and Al2O3 can be influenced by an external electric field [7, 8]. This situation is analogous to the system of this study, where a droplet of liquid is placed on pigment-coated paper between two electrodes. The voltage-induced increase of wetting (decrease of contact angle) indeed was found to take place in the direction parallel to the electrodes, strongly indicating, that the surface
energy of the substrate was modified. Compared with MilliQ water, similar kind of effect was observed for poly-DADMAC, for which, however, the change of contact angle was dependent on, and become slower with increasing concentration of poly-DADMAC. The presented results show that a paper substrate with controlled smoothness, barrier properties and surface energy is suitable as a printing substrate for functional inks like metals and conducting polymers. The print characteristics may be tuned by the choice of the top coating parameters like type of pigment, layer thickness and pre-treatment. As a result, printed electrodes together with controlled barrier properties of the paper substrate enabled the demonstration of various applications in liquid environment. The paper substrate provides a cheap, flexible and sustainable platform for developing various functional devices for e.g. printed electronics, sensors and smart packages. References 1. A. C. Siegel, S. T. Phillips, B. J. Wiley, G. M. Whitesides, Lab Chip 9 (2009) 2775. 2. R. Bollström, A. Määttänen, D. Tobjörk, P. Ihalainen, N. Kaihovirta, R. Österbacka, J. Peltonen, M. Toivakka, Organic Electronics 10 (2009) 1020. 3. R. Greef, R. Peat, L.M. Peter, D. Pletcher, J. Robinson, Instrumental Methods in Electrochemistry, Ellis Horwood: Chichester, UK (1985). 4. J. Bobacka, A. Lewenstam, A. Ivaska, (2000), J. Electroanal. Chem. 489 (2000) 17. 5. G. Lippmann, (1875), Ann. Chim. Phys. 5 (1875) 494. 6. F. Mugele, J.-C. Baret, J. Phys.; Condens. Matter 17 (2005) R705. 7. E. Chibowski, L. Holysz, W. Wojcik, Colloids and Surfaces A 92 (1994) 79. 8. M. Lubomska, E. Chibowski, Langmuir 17 (2001) 4181.
Printed electrodes enable electrochemical
functionalization of paperfunctionalization of paper
Presented by:
Jouko PeltonenProfessorÅbo Akademi University
OUTLINEOUTLINE
IntroductionIntroduction
Paper substrate for printed functionalityPaper substrate for printed functionality
Printed electrodesPrinted electrodes Printed electrodesPrinted electrodes
ElectrodepositionElectrodeposition of PEDOTof PEDOT--ClCl
Electric field assisted wettingElectric field assisted wetting
SummarySummary
Dimensional stability,
flexibility, smoothness
Purity, chemical resistance, wetting &
IntroductionIntroduction
PrintedPrinted functionalityfunctionality and ”and ”paperpaper electronicselectronics””
Plastics vs. paper? Plastics vs. paper?
Paper & board typically
– rough, porous, absorptive and resistance, wetting & adhesion properties
Barrier properties
Printability
Availability, recyclability, disposability
Price
– rough, porous, absorptive and chemically heterogeneous
+ widely available, flexible, low-cost, sustainable, printable
“It would be more appropriate if 50% of the development money was aimed at electronics on paper”
Peter Harrop, IDTechEx Ltd, 2009
Paper Paper substratesubstrate for for functionalfunctional printingprinting
Calendered clay topcoating
RMS 55 nmBasepaper
90 g/m2
PrecoatingSmoothing layer 7.0 g/m2
Barrier layer 20.0 g/m2
Topcoating 3.0 g/m2 - thickness 0.5-10 µm
- pore diameter 40-100 nm
- surface energy 27-45 mN/m
Subsequent coating layers provide controlled barrier Subsequent coating layers provide controlled barrier properties and smoothnessproperties and smoothness
SA latex barrier layer
RMS 260 nm
90 g/m
GCC Precoating
RMS 580 nm
Clay smoothing layer
RMS 300 nm
Washed Mylar® A
RMS 30 nm
R. Bollström et al., Organic Electronics 10 (2009) 1020.R. Bollström et al., Patent application FI(20095089), (2009).
20 x 20 µm2
Mapping of material properties by harmonic mode AFMMapping of material properties by harmonic mode AFM
Topograph
Kaolin-SB latex coated paper (2.5 x 2.5 µm2)
Elastic modulus map Adhesion map
Paper substratePaper substrate
P. Ihalainen, J. Järnström, A. Määttänen, J. Peltonen, Colloids Surfaces A, submitted
Local mechanical properties influence print quality (e.g. rotogravure ) Local chemical properties important e.g. for inkjet, (cf. Cassie surfaces)
Z-scale: 600 nm Z-scale: 5 Gpa Z-scale: 30 nN
CassieWenzel
Printability of a semiconductor ink by inkjetPrintability of a semiconductor ink by inkjet
Paper substratePaper substrate
Ink: 0.5 wt.% P3HT in o-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB)
P3HT
Määttänen et al., Colloid Surfaces A 367 (2010) 76-84
Määttänen et al., Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research (2010), submitted
0,45
0,50
0,55
KaolinC
KaolinB
PET
mica
[m
m]
5 µm2 µm
Paper substratePaper substrateSpreading kinetics of a semiconductor inkSpreading kinetics of a semiconductor ink
Ink: 0.5 wt.% P3HT in o-dichlorobenzene (o-DCB)
Määttänen, et al., Colloid Surfaces A 367 (2010) 76-84
Sz
Maximal spreading of inkjet droplets (radius R) of o-DCB is dependent on roughness, surface energy, pore volume and geometry of the paper coating.
The wetting rate (slope) correlates with the magnitude of surface extremes (asperities, Sz)
-1,8 -1,2 -0,6 0,0 0,6 1,2 1,8 2,4 3,0
0,30
0,35
0,40
Barrier
PCCB
PCCA
KaolinA
KaolinB
log
R [
mm
]
log t [s]
2 µm1 µm10 µm 3 µm
Topography, conductivityTopography, conductivity
Electrodes printed on paperElectrodes printed on paper
Ag comb structure:
- Line width 185 µm
- Gap 595 µm
Silver
Precoat
Barrier layer
Smoothing layer
Topcoat
Määttänen, et al., Colloid Surfaces A 367 (2010) 76-84
Silver ink for inkjet:
Silver content 20 wt%
Viscosity 10-13 cps @ 25 °C
Surface tension 27-31 dynes/cm
Resistivity: 20-60 µΩcm(nominal value 5-30 µΩcm)
Base paper
Precoat Smoothing layer
Precoat
Transistor printed on paper Transistor printed on paper
Printed Hygroscopic Insulator FET (HIFET)Printed Hygroscopic Insulator FET (HIFET)
I-V Characteristics
A transistor being stored for 4,5 months in room atmosphere
Moisture absorbed in the PVP layer makes the ions mobile enhancing device operation through enhanced gate field modulation.
Mobile negative ions moving into PVP/P3HT interface may cause electrochemical doping of the semiconductor.
R. Bollström et al., Organic Electronics 10 (2009) 1020.
GalvanostaticGalvanostatic electropolymerizationelectropolymerization
Electrochemical depositionElectrochemical deposition
Electrodes printed on paper offer a practical and cost-effective solution for e.g. sensors based on electrochemical detection.
A three-electrode cell setup
based on electrochemical detection.
The setup is simple with RT operation, and allows reproducible film deposition with highly controllable film thickness.
Printing of Ag/PANI working electrodesPrinting of Ag/PANI working electrodes
AFM: PANI layer
thickness ~1.5 µm
pore depth ~300 nm
Electrochemical depositionElectrochemical deposition
Ag flexographically printed
PANI (A = 1 cm2) inkjetted
Resistance over PANI layer ~ 50 Ω
pore depth ~300 nm
ToF-SIMS: Ag/Pani border
Polyaniline is fully covering the silver electrodes
Ihalainen et al. Thin Solid Films, submitted, 2010
0.1 M KCl + 0.01 M EDOTconstant current I = 35 µAcurrent density 0.08 mAcm-2
Electrochemical depositionElectrochemical deposition
Double-layer charging and formation of PEDOT-Cl nuclei on paper slightly slower than that on tin oxide
Ihalainen et al. Thin Solid Films, submitted, 2010
Characteristics of the deposited PEDOTCharacteristics of the deposited PEDOT--ClCl layerlayer
Dark-blue círcular area marks PEDOT-Cl layer
AFM (20×20 µm2):
3D clusters, height 0.2-3 µm
Heterogeneous
Electrochemical depositionElectrochemical deposition
Ihalainen et al. Thin Solid Films, submitted, 2010
Heterogeneous growth
SEM/EDS:
Presence of sulfur and chloride
An electric field can be also used to modify the surface energy of a substrate .
Electric field assisted wettingElectric field assisted wetting
Modifying the wetting of a liquid on a solid substrateModifying the wetting of a liquid on a solid substrate
Wetting properties of a liquid can be modified by an external electric field.*
change in liquid’s surface tension gives modified Young’s eguation:
An electric field can be also used to modify the surface energy of a substrate .
Chibowski et al.** have shown that surface energy of minerals (e.g., CaCO3, Al2O3) can be influenced by applying an electric field
electron donor and acceptor components change due to the reorientation of the hydrated water molecules
We use pigment-coated paper and the electrodes printed on it for demonstrating electric field assisted wetting.
** Chibowski, et al. Colloids Surfaces A 92, 79 (1994); Lubomska, et al. Langmuir 17, 4181 (2001)
* G. Lippmann, Ann. Chim. Phys. 5, 494 (1875); F. Mugele et al. J. Phys.: Condens Matter 17, R705 (2005)
Experimental setExperimental set--upup
Liquid: MilliQ water (18 MΩcm)
Substrate: GCC- coated paper
Electrodes: Flexoprinted silver
Electric field assisted wettingElectric field assisted wetting
Saarinen et al., NPPRJ, submitted, 2010
Wetting enhanced only towards paper substrate, caused by the change in surface energy.
SummarySummary
While having some short-comings as a substrate, paper and board have a few advantages over plastic substrates:
Better control of surface energy and wetting
Allows for online infrared sintering of metal inks
Environmentally friendly, compostable, widely available Environmentally friendly, compostable, widely available
Improved understanding of what is required from a substrate for printability of functional inks has been gained
A number of phenomena and printed functional device concepts demonstrated on paper open up many interesting applications
Acknowledgements
The Academy of Finland
The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and
Innovation (Tekes)Innovation (Tekes)
Co-authors: Anni Määttänen, Roger Bollström, Martti Toivakka, Milena
Stepien, Jarkko Saarinen, Petri IhalainenUlriika Mattinen, Johan Bobacka
Thank youPRESENTED BY
Jouko PeltonenJouko PeltonenProfessorÅbo Akademi [email protected]