22
MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017 David Rib, Environmental Manager Keith Shannon, Environmental Specialist Mitsubishi Cement Corporation

CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    1

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP

CDAWG November 2017

David Rib, Environmental Manager Keith Shannon, Environmental Specialist

Mitsubishi Cement Corporation

Page 2: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

OR…. NESHAP turned my CEMS into a MONSTER

The dreaded “Ka-boo-key”

monster!

Page 3: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

CEMS “In the Beginning”

A couple analyzers and a strip chart.

But the Times they are A-Changin’

Page 4: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

MCC CEMS in 2005

Page 5: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

Mitsubishi Cement Corporation Cushenbury Plant

Page 6: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

Exhausting Challenges

Page 7: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

California AB32 – GHG monitoring adds CO2,

flow and coal mill vents

– GHG verification requires auditable DAS, strict QC and high availability

– Alternate fuels help GHG

liability, but all fuels must have tight accounting.

Page 8: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

US EPA NESHAP – Initial limits on D/F and

required opacity monitoring (D/F means WHAT???)

– New limits for HCl, Hg, THC, PM with monitoring flow and clinker production

– MCC uses lime injection and activated carbon injection for emissions control

Page 9: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

MCC CEMS in 2015

Page 10: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

A New Stack Arises!

Page 11: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

Stack of 105’ is high enough.

Someone called it a “Baby Stack”

Page 12: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

And a New CEM Building

Page 13: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

MCC CEMS in 2016

Page 14: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

“CEMS” Rack: Moisture

THC

CO2

CO

SOx

NOx

O2

Page 15: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

Even the reliable Oxygen monitor is vulnerable to

corrosive gases!

Page 16: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

FTIR HCl CEMS Backup for:

CO2

CO

SOx

NOx

Moisture

Mr. PS-18

Page 17: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

Mercury CEMS Elemental & Ionic

Calibrator(s)

Permeater

Permeater permeater

Page 18: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

So many calibrations! It becomes a…….

Mercury Analyzer QC: Hg Analyzer QA (PS12A-Procedure 5): •Weekly Oxidation Test-System Integrity Test •Monthly Permeation Test •System Response Times (Elemental and Oxidized)-upscale and downscale •Quarterly Calibration Gas Audits (Elemental and Oxidized)-Quarterly, Except RATA Quarter. •Analyzer Linearity Test (Elemental and Oxidized)-Internal Calibrations •Measurement Error Test (3 Point Test in Triplicate)-Elemental and Oxidized (System Calibration) •Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)-Annual •7-Day Calibration Drift Test: Initial Compliance Test Only

FTIR HCl QC: •7-Day Calibration Drift Test •Quarterly Calibration Gas Audits: Quarterly, Except RATA Quarter. •Analyzer Linearity Test (Elemental and Oxidized)-Internal Calibrations •Measurement Error Test (3 Point Test in Triplicate)-System Calibrations •Relative Accuracy Test Audit (RATA)-Annual •Interference Tests: N2, CO, CO2, SO2, O2, THC, NOx, NH3, and Formaldehyde •System Response Times (upscale and downscale) •Dynamic Spiking (DS) •Level of Detection (LOD)

Page 19: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

Clinker Cooler Dust Collector Retrofitted for particulate monitoring Two new ducts with particulate CPMS

Page 20: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

Particulate spiking feeder

Page 21: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

Data Acquisition System Data Inputs:

Analyzer measurements Analyzer status

Flow values and checks Particulate CPMS output

Clinker Production Emission Control Injection Rates Process Status

Reporting Outputs: Daily Calibrations Weekly Hg checks Quarterly audits

Annual RATA Adjustments to 7% O2

Data Substitutions Periodic Compliance Reports

Page 22: CEMS Challenges of Cement NESHAP CDAWG November 2017

MITSUBISHI CEMENT CORPORATION

Can cement manufacturing and environment sustain each other?