Upload
cecilia-fleming
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CEDP
SNAPSHOTS OF PORT HURON’S KNOWLEDGE
ECONOMY Rex L. LaMore, Faron Supanich-Goldner,
Jimi Gandhi, John Melcher, and Kyle Wilkes
Community & Economic Development Program
Michigan State University
April 21, 2005
With support from the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration
Knowledge Economy IndicatorsSt. Clair County
CEDP
Mission
The Mission of the MSU-EDA University
Center is “to promote and support the
expansion of economic development efforts
in the State of Michigan through the
provision of research, training, and technical
assistance to entrepreneurs and economic
development agencies, private sector
leaders and faith-based and community-
based organizations serving distressed
communities.”
MSU-EDA University Center
CEDP
Knowledge Economy
The Knowledge Economy is the :
“Application of new methods or new technologies to the production or distribution of goods and services”
MSU’s Knowledge Economy Research Team, 2004
CEDP
Knowledge Economy
WHAT HAS CHANGED?
• Knowledge and information drive economic growth and development
• Occupations and industries shift rapidly in response to changing means of production and distribution
• Place still matters, though somewhat differently
CEDP
WHY DOES IT MATTER?
• Competition is increasingly intense and global
• Change is ever-more rapid
• Traditional techniques and tools for economic development are insufficient
Knowledge Economy
CEDP
WHY DOES IT MATTER?• Statewide average annual wages
Knowledge Economy occupations: $ 61,158
All other occupations: $ 33,141
• Overall job growth projections (2000-2010)U. S. 15.2 % Michigan 9.4 %
Expected growth in Knowledge Economy jobs
U. S. 21.0%Michigan 13.1%
Knowledge Economy
CEDP
The Progressive Policy InstituteNew Economy Project
State New Economy Index 2002
Source: www.ppionline.org
CEDP
23
17 30
13
100th – 76th percentile75th-51st percentile50th-26th percentile25th-1st percentile
2002 State New Economy Index Rankings
36
40
Source: www.ppionline.org
PPI New Economy Index Rankings
for Great Lakes States, 2002
CEDP
Michigan State UniversityKnowledge Economy Research
Group
Goal: To apply PPI’s New Economy Indexmeasures to Michigan counties
Sixteen indicators in 5 categories:• Knowledge Jobs• Digital Economy• Innovation• Globalization• Dynamism
CEDP
Knowledge Jobs Indicators
Michigan Knowledge Economy Index
• Information Technology Jobs
• Managerial and Professional Jobs
• Workforce Education
CEDP
Digital Economy Indicators
• Internet Use
• Cable Modem Access
• Digital Government
Michigan Knowledge Economy Index
CEDP
Innovation Indicators
• High-Tech Jobs
• Venture Capital
• Patents
• Engineers
• Bioscience Jobs
Michigan Knowledge Economy Index
CEDP
Globalization Indicators
• Firms with Foreign Parents
• Exporting Firms
Michigan Knowledge Economy Index
CEDP
Dynamism Indicators
• Manufacturing Job Change
• Sole Proprietorship Job Change
• Service Sector Job Change
Michigan Knowledge Economy Index
CEDP
LeadersContendersFollowersLaggards
Michigan Knowledge Economy IndexOverall County Rankings
Source: MSU Knowledge Economy Research Group
CEDP
Knowledge Economy Overall Index
Source: MSU Knowledge Economy Research Group
11. Macomb
35. Lapeer
43. St. Clair
62. Sanilac
LeadersContendersFollowersLaggards
St. Clair and Neighboring Counties
4311
35
62
CEDP LeadersContendersFollowersLaggards
Knowledge Economy IndicatorsEast Central Michigan RegionKnowledge Jobs
More than 25 %20 - 2515 - 20Less than 15
Percent over age 25 with college
degree
WorkforceEducation
Managerial & Professional Jobs
30 - 50 %25 - 3023 - 2519 - 23
Percent of workforce
More than 52.5 – 5.01.5 - 2.5Less than 1.5
IT jobs per 1000 jobs
InformationTechnology Jobs
Source: MSU Knowledge Economy Research Group
4715
37
59
CEDP
Knowledge Economy IndicatorsEast Central Michigan RegionDigital Economy
LeadersContendersFollowersLaggards
More than 30 %19 – 309.5 – 19Less than 9.5
Percent of local governmentswith websites
DigitalGovernment
More than 64 %60 - 6356 - 60Less than 55
Percent online at least
three days/week
Internet Use
Near completeModerateModestVery little
Geographic Coverage
Cable Modem Access
Source: MSU Knowledge Economy Research Group
4216
18
58
CEDP
Knowledge Economy IndicatorsEast Central Michigan RegionInnovation
LeadersContendersFollowersLaggards
BioscienceJobs
More than 85065 - 8500 – 65None
Number of jobs
More than 31.5 – 3.0.75 – 1.5Less than .75
Percent of workforce
High Tech Jobs
Engineers
4.3 – 15.83.0 – 4.31.4 – 2.9Less than 1.4
Percent of workforce
Source: MSU Knowledge Economy Research Group
Patents
More than 808 - 800 - 8None
Per 10,000 pop.
More than ThreeTwo or ThreeOneNone
Number of Firms
VentureCapital 52
16
47
67
CEDP
Knowledge Economy IndicatorsEast Central Michigan RegionGlobalization
LeadersContendersFollowersLaggards
Firms WithForeign Parents
More than 2510 - 241 – 9None
Number of firms
Firms That Export
50 - 100010 - 502 - 100 - 1
Number of firms
Source: MSU Knowledge Economy Research Group
144
22
36
CEDP
Knowledge Economy IndicatorsEast Central Michigan RegionDynamism Index
LeadersContendersFollowersLaggards
Employment change – service jobs
More than 18 %10 - 185 - 100 - 5
Percent gain or loss 1997-2000
Employment change – manufacturing jobs
More than 18 %10 - 185 - 100 - 5
Percent gain or loss 1997-2000
Employment change – sole proprietorships
More than 18 %10 - 185 - 100 - 5
Percent gain or loss 1997-2000
Source: MSU Knowledge Economy Research Group
6667
53
46
CEDP
• Office and administrative support • Farming, fishing and forestry • Production • Legal
• Life, physical and social science
• Architecture and engineering • Protective Service • Art, design, entertainment, sports and media • Installation, maintenance and repair • Community and social services • Business and financial
• Building/grounds cleaning & maintenance • Transportation and material moving • Healthcare support
• Management • Construction and extraction
• Personal care and service
• Healthcare practitioners and technical • Food preparation and serving related
• Computer and mathematical • Sales and related
• Education, training and library
Standard Occupation Groups(Knowledge Economy occupations in
bold)
CEDP
Source: www.michlmi.org
Projected Number of Jobs Added, 2000 - 2010
Occupations with highest projected number of new jobs in Michigan
0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 70,000
Sales and related occupations
Computer and mathematicaloccupations
Healthcare practitioners andtechnical occupations
Food preparation and servingrelated occupations
Transportation and materialmoving occupations
CEDP
Source: www.michlmi.org
Projected Number of Jobs Added, 2000 - 2010
Projected new jobs, Knowledge Economy occupations in Michigan
0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 30,000 35,000 40,000 45,000
Life, physical and social scienceoccupations
Architecture and engineeringoccupations
Management occupations
Computer and mathematicaloccupations
Education, Training and libraryoccupations
CEDP
Source: www.michlmi.org
Projected Rate of Job Growth, 2000 - 2010
Occupation groups with highest projected growth rates U.S. and Michigan comparison
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Computer and mathematicaloccupations
Healthcare supportoccupations
Personal care and serviceoccupations
Art design entertainment,sports and media occupations
Life, physical and socialscience occupations
U.S.
Michigan
CEDP
Source: www.michlmi.org
Projected Rate of Job Growth, 2000 - 2010
Projected job growth rate for Knowledge Economy occupations U.S. and Michigan comparison
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80%
Life, physical and social scienceoccupations
Architecture and engineeringoccupations
Management occupations
Education, Training and libraryoccupations
Computer and mathematicaloccupations
U.S.
Michigan
CEDP
Size of bubbles = ratio of all employees 2000
= Knowledge Economy groups
= All other occupation groups
Source: www.michlmi.org
Size and Growth of Knowledge Economy Occupation Groups in
Michigan
-10.0%
0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18%
Ratio of all employees 2000
Pro
ject
ed G
row
th R
ate
2000
-201
0
Computer and Mathematical
Life, Physical &Social Sciences
Education, Training & Library
Management Architecture &Engineering
CEDP
Knowledge Jobs
Planning for Knowledge Jobs
In the knowledge economy, an educated citizenry is critical to success. If a community does not get smarter it will get poorer.
A community should provide educational opportunities across the life-span of the workforce.
Begin with early childhood development with a seamless transition to k-12, higher education, career development and retraining programs.
CEDP
Establish a business/education roundtable as a regular forum for businesses to discuss education and training needs and for education to discuss program challenges, curriculum options and resources
Develop “technology education centers” designed to train participants on relevant technologies of interest to the local community.
Recapture high school graduates that leave the area for higher education through strategies such as forgiving student loans, promote local alumni networks, and welcome home events.
Knowledge Jobs
CEDP
Innovation
Planning for Innovation
Establish a technology business incubator
Create flexible investment funds to make capital available to emerging enterprises/technologies/entrepreneurs
Support an entrepreneurial environment that values risk takers and innovators
Provide broadband access
CEDP
Host business/community “innovation fairs”
Provide patent assistance
Establish links to higher education technology centers in your region to facilitate the location/expansion of innovative enterprises to your community
Establish a “speakers bureau of informed community leaders
Create a “technical assistance network”
Innovation
CEDP
Digital Economy
Planning for a Digital Economy
Link homes, schools, businesses and government to the global internet and to each other.
Create a community/business/government web presence
Provide broadband access where currently not available
Provide wireless access where appropriate
CEDP
Provide non-formal adult education programs for residents on the global communications network
Map your community’s communications network
Use digital communications to support democratic governance in you community.
Provide technical and financial assistance for residents and businesses to improve and expand their access to the digital economy
Require “open capacity” on new fiber networks
Digital Economy
CEDP
Globalization
Planning for Globalization
Facilitate export trade and global markets for existing products and services in your community (remember Canada is a Michigan neighbor)
Identify existing exporting firms and identify related local industries that may also export to similar markets
Consider attracting foreign based firms to your community in strategic and complementary industries
CEDP
Link to Michigan foreign trade zones.
Identify and describe your communities global transportation capacity and share that with your local businesses.
Identify and celebrate local ethnic/cultural heritages and explore possible international social capital opportunities.
Conduct an “industry cluster analysis” assessing for global opportunities
Organize training for key stakeholders
Globalization
CEDP
Dynamism
Planning for Dynamism
Establish effective communications among firms to anticipate change and develop responses.
Supportive transition strategies for your communities workforce.
Identify “new enterprises” in your community to assess potential emerging trends in your local economy.
CEDP
Implement “safety net” strategies for displaced workers and families to reduce personal stress and improve retention of skilled workers.
Run business “ birth announcements” in the local paper.
Support strong entrepreneurial development programs to help new businesses form and expand locally.
Provide access to a variety of types of capital for businesses.
Dynamism
CEDP
Build or rebuild “flexible space” environments that can be reused for a variety of production and services.
Support local business incubator programs.
Identify leakages in the local economy that may provide opportunities for business development.
Examine alternative forms of business ownership in potential business closures.
Dynamism