Upload
jerome-carr
View
223
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Cecilia ClementiCecilia ClementiDepartment of Chemistry
Rice UniversityHouston, Texas
Prediction of protein functional states by Prediction of protein functional states by multi-resolution protein modelingmulti-resolution protein modeling
The challenges in molecular biophysics:The “middle way”, in between a few small molecules and bulk
Large water clusters
Wet/Dry interfaces
Interaction with solutesquantum chemistry gives
molecular orbitals
one water molecule
what are the relevant variables?what is the intrinsic dimensionality?
…in between…
thermodynamicsdescribes the system
bulk water
C.Clementi, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, vol.18(1), 10-15
Empirical approach Theoretical approach
Biochemist view: Physicist view:
Protoporphyrin ring
Central Iron
1 nm
Example: representation of a Heme group
Biophysics should reconcile the two!
Physicists and biochemists often perceive molecular structure and function differently
Outline
Our toolbox to explore protein landscapes
at multiple resolutions
Application to characterizea protein functional state
Photoactive Yellow Protein
PYP is believed to be responsible for H.halophila's ability to respond to
blue light.
PYPHow?
PYP transforms light into biological signal
PYP is interesting to study because:
It is the prototype for the PAS domain
(a ubiquitous domain in signaling proteins)Its photochemistry is directly
analogous to rhodopsinPYP
PYP transforms light into biological signal
PYP’s native state.
Basic outline of the photocycle
How?We know the structure of
these states.
But the structure of this state is unkown.
The signaling state is elusive:
It’s difficult to observe experimentally
(because it partially unfolds)
It’s difficult to predict computationally
(broad range of time scales)
PYP’s signaling state?
How?
The signalling process can be characterized using a multiscale
approach:
1) Coarse Graining2) All atom reconstruction
3) All atom / quantum calculations
P.Das, S.Matysiak & C.Clementi PNAS 102, 10141-10146 (2005)
The signaling state ensemble can be characterized using a multiscale approach:
1) Coarse graining
What’s the role of a protein coarse-grained model?
Simplified models are largely used to test general ideas and principles on toy-systems
Recently they have been applied to make predictions on real protein systems
At what extent can protein coarse-grained models be used as predictive tools on real systems?
C.Clementi, Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2008, vol.18(1), 10-15
Building a coarse-grained protein model
2
2
i
j
Building a coarse-grained protein model
20 aminoacid “colors”
1-bead per residue (Cmodel)
P.Das, S.Matysiak & C.Clementi PNAS 102, 10141-10146 (2005)
A realistic coarse-grained protein model
We “photoactivate” the coarse grained model by perturbing the coarse grained forcefield
at the chromophore.
Dark PYP Photoactivated PYP
The free energy is computed as a function of the “Diffusion Coordinates”[“Determination of reaction coordinates via locally scaled diffusion map”,
M.A.Rohrdanz, W.Zheng, M.Maggioni & C.Clementi, J.Chem.Phys. 134, 124116 (2011)]
P.J. Ledbetter, B.P. Lambeth & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
We “photoactivate” the coarse grained model by perturbing the coarse grained forcefield
at the chromophore.
Dark PYP Photoactivated PYP
This perturbation has a strong effect on the free energy landscape, creating an on pathway intermediate.
P.J. Ledbetter, B.P. Lambeth & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
It is interesting to compare the results of this model (DMC) to a simpler model (GO)
The difference is in the inclusion of non-native interactions
DMCGO
P.J. Ledbetter, B.P. Lambeth & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
GO
mod
elD
MC
mod
elDark PYP
Photoactivated PYP
Comparison with available experimental data (on D25)
P.J. Ledbetter, B.P. Lambeth & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
experimental data from Bernard, et al.
Structure, 13, 953–962 (2005)
Flu
ctua
tions
(A
)
How much can we push
a prediction from a
protein coarse-grained model?
How accurate is the prediction?How can we test it quantitatively ?
Energy
foldedminimum
“activated”minimum?
unfoldedminimum
folded state ensemblechromophore in
trans configuration
folded state ensemblechromophore in cis configuration
activated statechromophore in cis configuration
photo-isomerization
protein“quake”
recovery
A.P.Heath, L.E.Kavraki & C.Clementi, Proteins 2007, 68, 646-661
Reconstruct backbone atoms
Reconstruct side-chain atoms
Start from only C-alpha atoms
Optimize structure(locally and globally)
The signaling state ensemble can be characterized using a multiscale approach:
2) All atom reconstruction
The signaling state ensemble can be characterized using a multiscale approach:
2) All atom reconstruction
Along backbone… Along backbone…
Alpha-carbon
LysineLysine
An example rotational isomer (rotamer)
Different rotamers can be obtained by twisting around all the residue
bonds.
The signaling state ensemble can be characterized using a multiscale approach:
2) All atom reconstruction
P.J. Ledbetter, B.P. Lambeth & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
Problem:
photo-isomerization changes the electronic structure of the chromophore
Solution:
use quantum chemistry to correct the force field
(collaboration with Gustavo Scuseria’s
group at Rice)
The chromophore is responsible for triggering conformational change.
But there are no standard force fields for this residue.
The forcefield needs to be derived from quantum
chemical computations, for cis, trans and protonated forms.
The signaling state ensemble can be characterized using a multiscale approach:
3) All atom/quantum computations
Existing parameters are ineffective at producing the isomerization energy
Trans (ground state) results
Cis results
Amber predicts ~ 14 kcal/mol,while pbe1pbe/6-31++G** predicts ~ 6 kcal/mol
P.J. Ledbetter & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
Parameter Fitting Procedure
Goal: Goal: Converge to parameters which approximate the molecule’s free energy
P.J. Ledbetter & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
New Parameter Fitting Procedure
MD SimulationsMD Simulations
What: What: With initial parameters, run very long
molecular dynamics simulations.
Goal: Goal: Generate an ensemble large
enough for statistical properties
to converge
New Parameter Fitting Procedure
ClusterClusterWhat: What: Select sub-
ensembles by clustering the MD trajectory, using its
size to estimate as a measure of free energy.
Goal: Goal: Choose a few structures on which to calculate the quantum
chemical energy.
New Parameter Fitting Procedure
Quantum CalculationsQuantum CalculationsWhat: What: Use Gaussian to calculate the quantum chemical energy of the molecule. (PBE1PBE 6-311G**)
Goal: Goal: Calculate the energy of the molecules
in a reliable way.
P.J. Ledbetter & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
New Parameter Fitting Procedure
New ParametersNew ParametersPerform a least squares fit
on the energy of the structures weighted by the
free energy estimate by varying the parameters.
If the parameters are realistic
enough, stop.
P.J. Ledbetter & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
New Parameter Fitting ProcedureResultsResults
P.J. Ledbetter & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
The signalling process can be characterized using a multiscale
approach:
1) Coarse Graining
3) QM parameter fitting for chromophore force field
2) All-atom reconstruction
All-atom structures of 25 most populated intermediate structures
Diffusion dynamics from the 25 reconstructed structures
P. J. Ledbetter, B.P. Lambeth & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
Lowest energy structures
are solvated
Structural Analysis of the Results
Native (dark) state Photoactivated ensemble
P.J. Ledbetter, B.P. Lambeth & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
How accurate is the prediction?How can we test it quantitatively ?
foldedminimum
“activated”
minimum?
unfoldedminimu
m
folded state ensemblechromophore in
trans configuration
folded state ensemblechromophore in cis configuration
activated statechromophore in cis configuration
comparable energy
pG
pR pB
Conformational entropy in pB
much largerthan pR
P. J. Ledbetter, B.P. Lambeth & C.Clementi, unpublished results (2011)
Next: design experimental tests(collaboration with Thomas Kiefhaber)
Clementi’s groupDr. Mary Rohrdanz (Rice Chemistry)Paul Ledbetter (Rice Applied Physics)Brad Lambeth (Rice Chem. Eng.)Wenwei Zheng (Rice Chemistry)Amarda Shehu (now: GMU)Payel Das (now: IBM Watson)Silvina Matysiak (now: U Maryland)
Collaborators:Prof. Kathy Matthews (Rice - Biochemistry)Prof. Lydia Kavraki (Rice - Computer Science)Prof. Gustavo Scuseria (Rice - Chemistry)Prof. Kurt Kremer (MPIP Mainz)Prof. Mauro Maggioni (Duke - Math)
$$ NSF (CAREER CHE-0349303, CCF-0523908, CNS-0454333)
$$ Texas Advanced Technology Program (003604-0010-2003)
$$ Norman Hackerman Welch Young Investigator Award
$$ Welch Foundation C-1570
$$ Hamill Innovation Award
Cecilia Clementi’s research groupCecilia Clementi’s research grouphttp://leonardo.rice.edu/~cecilia/research/
Graduate Students and Postdoctoral Positions
Available