Upload
arthur-cook
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CCJPA Sacramento to Roseville 3rd Track ProjectPlacer County Stakeholder Advisory Committee (SAC) Meeting #1Roseville City Hall
Monday, May 12, 20148:00 - 9:00 a.m.
SAC ROLES & RESPONSIBILITIES
• Represent your constituents’ key issues and concerns• Act as a liaison between CCJPA and the larger public
ensuring project information is distributed and input received
• Work closely with CCJPA to identify and address potential sensitivities and issues
• Meet at key milestones over the next year (up to four meetings) as a valued member of the SAC
We want to partner with you to assist with the development of this project!
PROJECT HISTORY
• December 11, 1991: Passenger rail service to Roseville opens– Since the opening, Placer County’s goal has been
to grow train service• 1998: Capitol Corridor Business Plan includes 4 round
trips to Auburn/10 to Roseville• 2002: Efforts formally began through initial design
project with UPRR• 2002-2011: Continuous coordination with UPRR to
initiate further studies for increased train service
PROJECT OBJECTIVES & BENEFITS
Project Objectives• Expand CCJPA service between Sacramento and
Roseville (up to 10 trains daily)• Preserve current freight operations and reliability
within the corridor
Project Benefits• Provide connections• Offer transportation choices• Create reliable travel alternatives• Enhance quality of life• Build congestion relief options• Drive and promote sustainable economic development
PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING & ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY
CCJPA, in partnership with UPRR, Sacramento, Roseville, PCTPA & SACOG will:
Identify/develop design elements to meet service goals
Develop track alignment/infrastructure
Prepare initial design/cost estimates
Perform environmental studies/review
2012 – INITIAL CORRIDOR STUDY
Alternatives are driven by specific criteria and approvals:• UPRR, CCJPA & Amtrak Engineering/Design Standards• Federal Railroad Administration Standards• California Public Utility Commission
ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS
Team Progress Meeting 2/xx/2012
GIS Presentation and walk through
Primary Impact Categories:
• Right-of-Way• Utilities• Structures &
Engineering• Track &
Operations• Environmental
Impacts
FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVE – PROPOSED PROJECT
A feasible alternative has been developed to move forward into environmental analysis in winter 2014.
• 17.8 mile corridor• Northern alignment• 11 new railroad bridges & overcrossings • New rail/ties/switches/turnouts & crossovers• Signals • Retaining & crash walls• Utility relocation• Enhanced Roseville station
FEASIBLE ALTERNATIVE – PROPOSED PROJECT
ROSEVILLE STATION
Potential Land Side Improvements(to be developed by City)• Parking provision
• Passenger amenities
• Transit connections
• Bike and pedestrian access
Trackside Improvements (as part of 3rd Track Project)• Track reconfiguration/ additional
platform
• Layover facility northeast of station
• Potential right-of-way along Pacific Street
Pacific St.
Existing Station Platform
Pro
pose
d L
ayover
Faci
lity
ENVIRONMENTAL OVERVIEW
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) & National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
Lead agencies mustidentify and minimize potential significant environmental impacts as well as invite the public to review and participate.
CEQA Lead: CCJPA
NEPA Lead: Federal Railroad Administration
FUNDING
Preliminary cost to construct 3rd Track = $200 million
• Funding strategy in progress
• CCJPA will use a number of funding sources
– Local and regional sources– Cap-n-trade– STIP– HSR bond (feeder service funds)
PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT ACTIVITIES
A variety of communication tools will be used to educate, inform and solicit broad-based input from the public and impacted stakeholders.• Project webpage
(Sactoroseville3rdtrack.com)• Project educational materials• Social media/media relations• Email notifications• SAC meetings & individual briefings• Public meetings (in-person & online)
PROJECT TIMELINE
Questions or Comments?
We want to know what you think!