Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Carotid Artery Stenting Today:���A Few Updating Remarks
Camilo R. Gomez, MD, MBA Director, Alabama Neurological Institute
Birmingham, Alabama
Carotid Stenting Disclaimer & Warning
Company Relationship Pharmaceutical BMS-Sanofi-Aventis Abbott Laboratories Parke-Davis Devices Alsius Corporation Boston Scientific Guidant Corporation CoAxia
Consultant. Speaker. Investigator. Speaker. Investigator. Investigator
Consultant. Speaker. Investigator. Consultant. Speaker. Investigator. Consultant. Speaker. Investigator. Consultant. Speaker. Investigator.
Many Statements Not FDA-Approved
Carotid Stenting ���Why Should We Even Consider This?
Carotid Stenting ���When We Can Do This?
Avg = 15 minutes
Carotid Stenting ���In Expert Hands… …It Could Not Be Simpler
Local Anesthesia No Sedation Same Day Discharge (!)
Carotid Stenting���NASCET: Ipsilateral Stroke (18 mo.)
Essentially Less than 80 years of age
No Cardiac Arrhythmias No Organ Failure Less than 25% Had:
Diabetes Hypercholesterolemia Angina
NASCET. Stroke 1991; 22:711.
Carotid Stenting���NASCET: The Best Patients
Cranial Nerve Injury = 7.6% Wound Hematoma 5.5% Wound Infection = 3.4% Myocardial Infarction = 0.9% CHF = 0.6% Arrhythmia = 1.2% Other Cardiovascular = 1.2%
NASCET. NEJM. 1991; 325:445-53
Carotid Stenting���NASCET: Other Surgical Complications
659 Patients with Contralateral Pathology
Risk of Stroke & Death: Contralateral Mild --> 4.0% Contralateral Moderate --> 5.1% Contralateral Occluded --> 14.3%
Contralateral Occlusion Hazards Ratio --> 2.11 - 2.18
Gasecki et al J NSG. 1995; 83: 778
Carotid Stenting���NASCET: Predictors of Stroke and Death
Decreased Odds: Ocular Symptoms Only (0.49)
Increased Odds: Women (1.44) SBP >180 (1.82) PVD (2.19) Contral. Occl. (1.91) Siphon Sten. (1.56) ECA Sten (1.61)
Rothwell et al. BMJ 1997; 315:1571
Carotid Stenting���Predictors of Stroke & Death from CEA
Surgical Group (n = 1807) Major Stroke 30d = 6.6% Major Stroke+Death 30d = 7.0%
Medical Group (n=1211) Major Stroke 30d = 4.8% Major Stroke+Death 30d = 4.8%
ECST. Lancet 1998; 351: 1379-1387
Carotid Stenting���Carotid Endarterectomy: ECST
113,300 Medicare Patients Undergoing CEA Institutions:
“Trial” Hospitals “Non-Trial” Hospitals (By Volume of CEA)
Perioperative Mortality: “Trial” --> 1.4% “Non-Trial” --> 1.7% - 1.9% - 2.5%
Wennberg et al. JAMA 1998; 279:1278
Carotid Stenting���Medicare Data on CEA
Carotid Stenting ���Medicare Coverage: The Process
Carotid Stenting���SAPPHIRE (30 Days)
Yadav J et al. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493-1501
Carotid Stenting��� SAPPHIRE (365 Days)
Yadav J et al. N Engl J Med 2004;351:1493-1501
30 Day Complication rates: Mortality = 41 (0.86%) Minor Stroke = 129 (2.72%) Major Stroke = 71 (1.49%) All Stroke = 192 (3.94%) All Stroke + Death = 241 (5.07%)
Stroke = 1.42% over 6-12 months Restenosis rate = 1.99 % & 3.46% (6 & 12
months)
Wholey M et al. Cathet Cardiovasc Interv 50:160. 2000
Carotid Stenting���International CAS Registry
Carotid Stenting��� ARCHeR Trials
CREST: Randomized vs. CEA 2500 Symptomatic or Asymptomatic
ACT I Randomized vs. CEA 1858 Asymptomatic
VIVA Single Group Symptomatic & Asymptomatic
Carotid Stenting Current Studies: Phase III
691 Cases (December 2003) Up to 20 cases per operator Peri-procedural Stroke & Death:
3.1% for Asymptomatic Patients (n=395) 4.3% for Symptomatic (n= 191) 3.5% Overall
Carotid Stenting���CREST: Lead-In Phase
SONOMA Single Group Registry 1650 Patients
CREATE PAS Single Group Registry
CAPTURE 2 Single Group Registry 10000 Patients
Carotid Stenting Current Studies: Phase IV
Sponsor: Guidant Corporation Design:
Phase IV Study (Post-Market) 315 Operators in 137 Hospitals
Enrollment to Date: >4000 High-Risk Patients Preliminary Results (March 2006)
Patients: 2500 Primary Outcomes:
30-day Death, Stroke and MI = 5.7% 30-day Major Stroke & Death = 2.5%
Carotid Stenting Recent Reports: Preliminary CAPTURE Data
4,111 Patients in 150 Sites CAPTURE 2: 1,987 Patients (On-Going) EXACT: 2,124 Patients (Completed)
Composite 30-day Stroke and Death
Carotid Stenting Recent Results: CAPTURE 2 and EXACT
Stroke & Death (SX)
Stroke & Death (ASX)
Stroke & Death (ALL)
CAPTURE 2 6.0% 3.1% 3.8%
EXACT 7.3% 3.0% 4.0%
Courtesy of Gray, WA. TCT October 23, 2007
Design: Phase III, Open label, Randomized CAS vs. CEA
Enrollment: 1200 Symptomatic Patients in 35 Centers
Primary Outcomes: 30-day Ipsilateral Stroke or Death
Carotid Stenting Recent Reports: SPACE
Carotid Stenting Recent Reports: SPACE
End Point Carotid Stenting, n (%)
Carotid Endarterectomy, n (%)
Odds Ratio (CAS vs CEA) (95% CI)
Primary end point 41 (6.84) 37 (6.34) 1.09 (0.69 – 1.72)
Ipsilateral ischemic stroke 39 (6.51) 30 (5.14) 1.26 (0.77 – 2.18)
Ipsilateral intracerebral bleeding 1 (0.17) 5 (0.86) 0.19 (0.004 – 1.74)
Death 4 (0.67) 5 (0.86) 0.78 (0.15 – 3.64)
Carotid Stenting��� Cochrane Review of Evidence
Carotid Stenting��� Cochrane Review of Evidence
Carotid Stenting��� Cochrane Review of Evidence
Carotid Stenting���Growth in Carotid Stenting: A Problem?
Source: Roubin, G.S.
Carotid Stenting Market Estimates (Millions)
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008
HRI, Dec 2003 $41.2 $92.3 $119.3 $145.2 $162.8
Morgan Stanley $23 $62 $74 $292 $398
Bernstein Research $5 $31 $53 $110 n/a
Carotid Stenting ���Medicare Coverage: The Process
Carotid Stenting ���Medicare Coverage: Facilities
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/MedicareApprovedFacilitie/CASF/
Carotid Stenting ���Market Performance
Carotid Stenting ���Acceptance by Surgical Community
Carotid Stenting ���Acceptance by Surgical Community
Carotid Stenting Paradoxical Created Behavior
“The friend of my adversity I shall always cherish most. I can better trust those who helped to relieve the gloom of my dark hours than those who are so ready to enjoy with me the sunshine of my prosperity.”
Ulysses. S. Grant
CAS Stenting���Filters for Embolic Protection
CAS Stenting���Global Impact of Protection
Roubin et al Circulation. 2001 Jan 30;103(4):532-7
Carotid Stenting��� Our Long-Term Experience
Carotid Stenting���Single Center Long-Term Experience
“No Equipment is a Substitute for Good Technique!”
CAS Stenting���Operator Skill’s: Sine Qua Non
Updated on 04/13/04
Protection Devices
Carotid Stenting���Perspective on Operator’s Skills
N 108 113
Age 66.7 70.0* Male 66% 62% Caucasian 90% 98% HTN 69% 81%* Diabetes 34% 28% MI 19% 28% CHF 7% 4% Baseline % stenosis 76% 75%
* p < 0.05
Carotid Stenting ���Wallstent Trial: Results
* p=0.036 ** p=0.049
Carotid Stenting ���Wallstent Trial: Major End-Points
Sponsor: Assistance Publique – Hospitaux de Paris
Design: Phase III, Open label, Randomized CAS vs. CEA
Expected Enrollment: 872 Symptomatic Patients Enrollment: 527 (September 2005) in 30 Centers Primary Outcomes:
30-day Stroke or Death 2-4 year stroke, death or ipsilateral stroke
Secondary Outcomes: Numerous
Carotid Stenting Recent Reports: EVA3S
Mas J et al. N Engl J Med 2006;355:1660-1671
Carotid Stenting Recent Reports: EVA3S
Operator’s Experience Surgeons -> At Least 25 CEA Previous Year Interventionists -> 12 CAS or 5/35 Supra-aortic ->
“No Difference (10% vs 12.3%)” Technique:
Antiplatelet Therapy “Recommended” (83-85% on Dual)
Single device vs. Multiple devices (5/7)
Carotid Stenting EVA3S Commentary
Carotid Stenting ���Credentialing, Experience and Learning Curve
Carotid Stenting ���Beware of Guidelines!!
The Growth of Intellectual Communism
Carotid Stenting���Surgically Inaccessible Lesions
Carotid Stenting���Non-Atherosclerotic Pathology: FMD
Carotid Stenting���Non-Atherosclerotic Pathology: Radiation
Carotid Stenting���Reconstructive Stenting
Carotid Stenting���Reconstructive Stenting
History: 75 y.o. woman Recurrent Left Side Weakness One Episode of Right Side Weakness
Physical Examination: No Deficits Loud Bruits
Carotid Stenting CASE 1: Transient Ischemic Attacks
Carotid Stenting Final Thought
The Warrior Creed
Wherever I go, everyone is a little bit safer because I am there.
Wherever I am, anyone in need has a friend.
Whenever I return home, everyone is happy I am there...
...It's a better life! Robert L. Humphrey, J.D.