Capstone Strategy 2005

  • Upload
    mash68

  • View
    219

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    1/18

    Strategy

    Strategic Plan might consist of:

    1) Vision or Mission Statement

    2) S.W.O.T. Analysis (or Environmental and Internal scans)

    3) Tactical and Functional Area Plans

    Strategy and Tactics differ mainly around

    time scale.

    In Capstone, a 5-8 year Strategy is supported withannual tactical decisions.

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    2/18

    Strategy

    Michael Porter argues for a top-down view. Strategy is designed

    at the top of the organization, with the goal of positioning

    resources and building relationships in a unique way.

    Eric Banabeau says strategy should emerge from the bottom-upin a sort of dance with the marketplace, and that the goal of

    strategy should be to apply simple rules.

    From where in the organization strategy shouldemerge?

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    3/18

    Introduction

    A strategy is one of four

    organizational time drivers.

    TIME IN YEARS

    Mission Statement

    (timeless)

    Strategy

    (3-5 years)

    Operational Intents

    (1 year)

    Tactics

    (Day to day)

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    4/18

    CAPSTONE STRATEGIES

    Strategies are declared incorporate missionstatements

    Capstone firms may developand execute any strategy (or

    none at all - though that isntadvisable). Basic strategiesinclude:

    Overall Cost Leader

    Cost Leader with Focus

    (Low Tech or ProductLife-Cycle)

    Differentiator

    Differentiator with Focus(High-Tech or Product

    Life-Cycle)

    STRATEGYMission Statement

    PERFORMANCEASSESSMENT

    Success Measurements

    Analyst ReportRound Analysis - Star

    Summary

    INDUSTRY AND MARKETANALYSIS

    S.W.O.T AnalysisCompetitor AnalysisCompetitive Analysis

    FUNCTIONAL PLANNINGR&D

    MarketingProduction

    HRFinance

    TQM

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    5/18

    Porter Curve

    ROI

    Market Share

    High

    HighLow

    Extensive coverage on Porters theories ofcompetitive advantage are easily located

    on the internet.

    Those theories in a Capstone context

    are explained in a tutorial on the website.

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    6/18

    ROI

    Market Share

    High

    HighLow

    Porter CurveFirms with High ROI / Low Overall Market

    Share would likely have a clearly defined

    focused strategy

    High Overall Market Share / High ROI firms

    would likely have a strong position in all

    segmentsrisky, but effective when executed

    properly

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    7/18

    Porter Curve

    ROI

    Market Share

    High

    HighLow

    Firms in the middle have a less definable identity,

    and a hard time competing. They might have anumber of sofa-bed product lines: Not great sofas

    not great beds.

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    8/18

    BCG Growth/Share Matrix

    Marke

    tGrowth

    Low

    High

    Market Share

    High Low

    ?

    The Boston Consulting

    Group Growth-Share

    Matrix was developed in

    the 1960s as a tool to

    assess a firms StrategicBusiness Unit (SBU) or

    product

    Long-term success is

    achieved by having a mix

    of high-growth potential

    products that require lots

    of cash, and low-growth

    cash cows that

    generate the required $$

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    9/18

    BCG Growth/Share Matrix

    M

    arketGr

    owth

    Low

    High

    Market ShareHigh Low

    ?

    Star products occupy

    strong positions in high

    growth markets

    Cows occupy strong

    positions in low growth

    markets

    Question Marks havelow market share in

    segments with strong

    growth

    Dogs are low market

    share products

    positioned in low

    potential markets

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    10/18

    Capstone Strategies

    The Situation Analysisgenerated an overview of the forces atwork within the Capstone market place.

    Now you must decide how to use that information to gain acompetitive advantage.

    There are many different approaches - all of which can besuccessful depending on how well they are implementedtactically.

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    11/18

    OVERALL COST LEADER

    An overall cost leader will attempt to be the low-cost producer inevery segment of the market. They will have good profit marginson allsales while keeping prices low for price-sensitive customers.

    Firm Profile: More likely to re-position products than introduce new ones to

    the market

    Capacity improvements are unlikely to be undertaken (may runovertime instead)

    Automation may be pursued to increase margins

    Investments will be financed with debt and/or stock issues

    Tend to spend less on promotion and sales

    Focus on Market Share, Profits, and Stock Price

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    12/18

    COST LEADER WITH LOW-TECH FOCUS

    A low-tech focused cost leader seeks to dominate the price sensitivemarket segments. Their aim is to set prices below all competitors -and still be profitable.

    Firm Profile: Multiple product lines in the low-tech segments (Low &

    Traditional)

    Invest heavily in automation

    Spend heavily on advertising to cost sensitive customers (salespeople have more than one product to pitch to prospects)

    Investments financed with debt and/or stock issues

    Focus on ROS, ROE, and Profits

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    13/18

    COST LEADER WITH PRODUCT LIFE-CYCLE FOCUS

    A product life-cycle focused cost leader will seek to minimize costs

    through efficiency and expertise. Products will be allowed to age andchange in appeal from high-tech, to traditional, and eventually lowend buyers.

    Firm Profile:

    Minimum presence in specialty segments (Size & Performance)

    Low R&D spending (very little re-positioning & new product every 2-3

    years) Invest in automation earlyin the products life-cycle

    High spending on promotion and sales

    Focus on ROE, ROS, and Profits

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    14/18

    DIFFERENTIATOR

    A Differentiator will seek to create maximum awareness andbrand equity. They want to be well known as makers of highquality/highly desirable products.

    Firm Profile:

    High R&D spending to keep products fresh

    Maintain a presence in all market segments

    Spend heavily on advertising and sales to create maximumawareness and accessibility

    Prices tend to be higher

    Focus on Market Share, Profits, and Stock Price

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    15/18

    DIFFERENTIATOR WITH HIGH-TECH FOCUS

    A high-tech differentiator seeks to be known far and wide as the topproducer of the best performing state-of-the-art products.

    Firm Profile:

    Multiple product lines in high-tech segments (High, Performance,and Size)

    Minimum focus in other segments

    High promotion and sales investments to create maximumawareness and accessibility

    High R&D expenditures to continually introduce new product linesand keep existing products fresh

    Unlikely to invest in increased automation or production capacity

    Focus on ROA, Asset Turnover, and ROE

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    16/18

    DIFFERENTIATOR WITH PRODUCT LIFE-CYCLE FOCUS

    A product life-cycle differentiator seeks to be well-known as a topproducer of good performing products in each of the targetedsegments.

    Firm Profile: Multiple product lines in targeted segments (High, Traditional, and

    Low)

    Minimum focus in other segments

    High promotion and sales investments to create maximumawareness and accessibility

    High R&D expenditures to continually re-position product linesand keep products fresh

    Unlikely to invest in increased automation or production capacity

    Focus on ROA, Stock Price, and Asset Turnover

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    17/18

    Strategies Evolve

    Todays shift istomorrows

    nightmare

    Poor tactics undermine a good strategy Good tactics can overcome a poor strategy

  • 8/2/2019 Capstone Strategy 2005

    18/18

    SUMMARY

    There is no "magic bullet," guaranteed winningstrategy. Each simulation has a unique

    competitive dynamic.

    Successful firms will focus on planning,

    strategic alignment, teamwork, competitoranalysis, and tactical adjustments.