CAPITAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE AGENDA CALL TO ORDERvtaorgcontent.s3-us-west-1.amazonaws.com/Site_Content/cpc_032819_packet.pdf日本語 / 한국어 / tiếng Việt / Tagalog. Disclosure

CAPITAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE

Thursday, March 28, 2019

12:00 PM

VTA Conference Room B-106

3331 North First Street

San Jose, CA

AGENDA

CALL TO ORDER

1. ROLL CALL

2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS:

This portion of the agenda is reserved for persons desiring to address the Committee on

any matter not on the agenda. Speakers are limited to 2 minutes. The law does not

permit Committee action or extended discussion on any item not on the agenda except

under special circumstances. If Committee action is requested, the matter can be placed

on a subsequent agenda. All statements that require a response will be referred to staff

for reply in writing.

3. ORDERS OF THE DAY

CONSENT AGENDA

4. ACTION ITEM -Approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of February 28, 2019.

REGULAR AGENDA

5. INFORMATION ITEM -Receive a presentation on the process and controls for

delivering projects in the VTA Capital Program.

6. ACTION ITEM -Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors adopt the fiscal years

2020 and 2021 Program of 2016 Measure B projects and programs.

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority

Capital Program Committee March 28, 2019

Page 2

7. ACTION ITEM -Reaffirm previous or provide new policy direction on the following

remaining 2000 Measure A projects to ensure that the proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021

Capital Budget aligns with the Board of Directors' priorities:

(A) Mineta San Jose Airport People Mover;

(B) Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track; and

(C) Eastridge to BART Regional Connector Light Rail Extension.

8. ACTION ITEM -Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors approve the Proposed

Fiscal Year 2020 and 2021 Capital Budget.

OTHER ITEMS

9. Items of Concern and Referral to Administration.

10. Review Committee Work Plan. (Flynn)

11. Committee Staff Report. (Flynn)

12. Chairperson's Report. (Liccardo)

13. Determine Consent Agenda for a future Board of Directors Meeting.

14. ANNOUNCEMENTS

15. ADJOURN

In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and Title VI of the Civil Rights

Act of 1964, VTA will make reasonable arrangements to ensure meaningful access to its

meetings for persons who have disabilities and for persons with limited English proficiency who

need translation and interpretation services. Individuals requiring ADA accommodations should

notify the Board Secretary’s Office at least 48-hours prior to the meeting. Individuals requiring

language assistance should notify the Board Secretary’s Office at least 72-hours prior to the

meeting. The Board Secretary may be contacted at (408) 321-5680 or

[email protected] or (408) 321-2330 (TTY only). VTA’s home page is

www.vta.org or visit us on www.facebook.com/scvta. (408) 321-2300: 中文 / Español /

日本語 / 한국어 / tiếng Việt / Tagalog.

Disclosure of Campaign Contributions to Board Members (Government Code Section 84308) In

accordance with Government Code Section 84308, no VTA Board Member shall accept, solicit,

or direct a contribution of more than $250 from any party, or his or her agent, or from any

participant, or his or her agent, while a proceeding involving a license, permit, or other

entitlement for use is pending before the agency. Any Board Member who has received a

contribution within the preceding 12 months in an amount of more than $250 from a party or

from any agent or participant shall disclose that fact on the record of the proceeding and shall not

make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use his or her official position to influence

the decision. A party to a proceeding before VTA shall disclose on the record of the proceeding

any contribution in an amount of more than $250 made within the preceding 12 months by the

party, or his or her agent, to any Board Member. No party, or his or her agent, shall make a

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority

Capital Program Committee March 28, 2019

Page 3

contribution of more than $250 to any Board Member during the proceeding and for three

months following the date a final decision is rendered by the agency in the proceeding. The

foregoing statements are limited in their entirety by the provisions of Section 84308 and parties

are urged to consult with their own legal counsel regarding the requirements of the law.

All reports for items on the open meeting agenda are available for review in the Board

Secretary’s Office, 3331 North First Street, San Jose, California, (408) 321-5680, the Monday,

Tuesday, and Wednesday prior to the meeting. This information is available on VTA’s website

at http://www.vta.org and also at the meeting.

NOTE: THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS MAY ACCEPT, REJECT OR MODIFY

ANY ACTION RECOMMENDED ON THIS AGENDA.

Capital Program Committee

Thursday, February 28, 2019

MINUTES

CALL TO ORDER

The Regular Meeting of the Capital Program Committee (CPC) was called to order at

12:05 p.m. by Chairperson Liccardo in Conference Room B-106, 3331 North First Street,

San José, California.

1. ROLL CALL

Attendee Name Title Status

Larry Carr Member Present

Cindy Chavez Member Present

Dev Davis Alternate Member N/A

Susan Ellenberg Alternate Member N/A

Glenn Hendricks Alternate Member Absent

Chappie Jones Vice Chairperson Present

Sam Liccardo Chairperson Present

Howard Miller Alternate Member N/A

Rob Rennie Member Present

Rich Tran Member Absent

A quorum was present.

2. PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS

There were no Public Presentations.

3. ORDERS OF THE DAY

There were no Orders of the Day.

4. Elect Committee Vice Chairperson for 2019

Chairperson Liccardo opened the floor for nominations for the position of 2019 Capital

Program Committee (CPC) Vice Chairperson. The Committee nominated Chappie Jones

as Vice Chair for 2019.

M/S/C (Chavez/Carr) to close the nominations and elect Chappie Jones as the 2019

CPC Vice Chairperson.

NOTE: M/S/C MEANS MOTION SECONDED AND CARRIED AND, UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED,

THE MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY.

Revised Agenda Item #4

oblena_m

Rectangle

Capital Program Committee Minutes Page 2 of 5 February 28, 2019

RESULT: ELECTED VICE CHAIRPERSON – Agenda Item #4

MOVER: Cindy Chavez, Member

SECONDER: Larry Carr, Member

AYES: Carr, Chavez, Jones, Liccardo, Rennie

NOES: None

ABSENT: Tran

CONSENT AGENDA

5. Regular Meeting Minutes of November 30, 2018

M/S/C (Chavez/Carr) to approve the Regular Meeting Minutes of November 30, 2018.

6. 2019 Capital Program Committee Meeting Schedule

M/S/C (Chavez/Carr) to approve the 2019 CPC Meeting Schedule.

RESULT: APPROVED – Agenda Items #5 - #6

MOVER: Cindy Chavez, Member

SECONDER: Larry Carr, Member

AYES: Carr, Chavez, Jones, Liccardo, Rennie

NOES: None

ABSENT: Tran

REGULAR AGENDA

7. Proposed FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget

Chris Augenstein, Director of Planning and Programming; Scott Haywood,

Transportation Planning Manager; and Carol Lawson, Fiscal Resources Manager,

provided a presentation titled “Proposed FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget,” that described

VTA’s budget process, types of funds, source of funds, and use of funds.

Public Comment

Doug Muirhead, Interested Citizen, suggested the CPC review the evaluation criteria. He

expressed concern on Eastridge to BART Light Rail Extension Project, the use of copper

wires for networks in River Oaks campus, and well removal at Chaboya Yard.

Adena Levin, Interested Citizen, suggested prioritizing projects that improve efficiency,

improve passenger service, and are fiscally sustainable.

Roland Lebrun, Interested Citizen, expressed concern about Caltrain funding and the

diverted Caltrain double tracking funds.

Members of the Committee provided the following comments: 1) revisit budget

framework and determine proper percentage use of operations and maintenance versus

capital funds; 2) budget criteria should always be presented to the Board of Directors

(Board); 3) suggested a two-year budget cycle with a four-year budget projection;


oblena_m

Rectangle


4) strategic location of charging stations for the Electric Vehicle (EV) buses; 5) results of

the recommendations from the Ad Hoc Financial Stability Committee to the capital

budget; and 6) expressed concern about operations cost of the Eastridge light rail

connection.

On order of Chairperson Liccardo, and there being no objection, the Committee

reviewed and discussed the Proposed Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021 Capital Budget.

8. FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal

Marcella Rensi, Deputy Director of Programming and Congestion Management, provided

a presentation entitled, FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Funding Proposal.

Members of the Committee provided the following comments: 1) expressed concern

about the debt service for 2016 Measure B; 2) prioritize projects that create revenue;

3) requested to receive an update on the amount of funds the organization will receive

every two years; and 4) start conversation with Caltrain and Joint Powers Authority

(JPA) regarding the grade separation and develop funding mechanisms that will benefit

VTA.

Public Comments

Robin Roemer, Interested Citizen, expressed concern about the Charcot Overcrossing

project.

Mr. Lebrun commented on the following: 1) funding for BART Phase II; 2) integrated

station plan for Diridon; 3) commended the City of Mountain View and Sunnyvale for

their approach regarding grade separation; and 4) opposed the use of 2016 Measure B

funds to refurbish Caltrain diesel trains.

Ms. Levin commented about the funding for the State Route (SR) 85 Corridor, Caltrain

grade separation, and BART Phase II.


received the FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal.

9. 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program Projects

Carolyn Gonot, Chief Engineering and Program Delivery Officer; Ken Ronsse, Deputy

Director of Rail and Facilities; and Jim Unites, Deputy Director of Transit Planning and

Capital Development, provided a presentation entitled, 2000 Measure A Program Update.

Public Comments

Mr. Lebrun expressed concerns on the Eastridge to BART light rail and current design of

the Diridon station. He suggested relocating the maintenance facility for BART Phase II

and relocating the light rail station at Diridon.

Ms. Levin expressed concern about the planned light rail expansion and BART extension

from Diridon to Santa Clara.


oblena_m

Rectangle


Members of the Committee provided the following comments: 1) expressed concern

about the cost-effectiveness of extending light rail to Eastridge; 2) explore different

modes of transportation and multiple uses for the light rail dedicated lanes; 3) consider

ridership as a main criterion in making transportation decisions; and 4) work with City of

San Jose and County of Santa Clara in looking at development sites.


received an update on the 2000 Measure A Transit Improvement Program Projects

OTHER ITEMS

10. Items of Concern and Referral to Administration

A Member of the Committee asked for the request for information (RFI) about the BART

security.

11. Committee Work Plan

Mr. Flynn reviewed the Committee Work Plan.


reviewed the CPC Work Plan.

12. Committee Staff Report

There was no Committee Staff Report.

13. Chairperson's Report

Chairperson Liccardo reported on two groundbreaking events: 1) joint event with

Caltrans for the US 101 Managed Lanes on March 8, 2019; and 2) Mathilda/US 101/SR

237 Interchange on March 22, 2019.

14. Determine Consent Agenda for future Board of Directors Meeting

CONSENT:

None.

REGULAR:

None.

15. ANNOUNCEMENTS

There were no Announcements.

16. ADJOURNMENT

On order of Chairperson Liccardo, and there being no objection, the meeting was

adjourned at 2:05 p.m.


oblena_m

Rectangle


Respectfully submitted,

Michael Diaresco, Board Assistant

VTA Office of the Board Secretary


oblena_m

Rectangle

Date: March 25, 2019

Current Meeting: March 28, 2019

Board Meeting: N/A

BOARD MEMORANDUM

TO: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority


FROM: Chief Planning and Engineering Officer, Carolyn M. Gonot

SUBJECT: Process and Controls for Delivering Projects in the VTA Capital Program

FOR INFORMATION ONLY

BACKGROUND:

A capital project is defined an expenditure of over $5,000 for a long-lived asset, such as property

and equipment used by VTA in its operations, which is expected to benefit future periods. This

includes expenditures to improve or extend the useful life of a capital asset (such as a midlife

overhaul as well as studies that lead to or inform future capital projects.

VTA’s Capital Program plans, administrates the prioritization process, implements, monitors and

reports on the status of capital projects. VTA currently has a portfolio of approximately 280 very

diverse active projects. These range from multi-year complex megaprojects (like BART Silicon

Valley) to highway/Express Lane projects to technology projects to standard replacement of

specialized tools and equipment, as well as various other categories of projects VTA requires to

provide mobility solution for Santa Clara County.

The Capital Program has a well-established framework of processes and controls for helping

ensure that each project contained in the portfolio of capital projects is successfully and

efficiently implemented so that VTA receives maximum value from its capital investment. It

should be noted, however, that as part of VTA’s ongoing effort to continually enhance quality

and respond to changing conditions, these processes and controls are reviewed and revised

periodically.

A broad overview of the VTA capital process and the associated internal controls in place to

promote successful project delivery, promote transparency and accountability, and monitor and

report on progress will be described in the following.

5

Page 2 of 3

DISCUSSION:

The capital project process at VTA consists of project inception through close out using a formal

practice and standard set of tools. Many of these standards are outlined in formal Work

Instructions for required implementations by project managers and support staff. The main

Project Control tools include the following:

• Financial Control

o Separate, independent responsibility and process for establishing project budget,

funds management, and invoice approval process

o Segregation of duties and independent oversight and verification throughout

project process

o Multiple layers of independent review and approval for all invoices

o Defined process and procedures to modify project budget

• Document Control

o Standard structure

o Available to all team members

o Used for project management and record keeping

• Cost Control

o Formal breakdown structure to identify cost types and manage budget

o Project budget, fund and cost tracking

o Monthly cost reporting to provide information to project team and management

o Semi-annual summary cost information provided to Board

o Formal and integrated process for invoice payment

• Schedule Control

o Establishment of project master schedule for all project phases

o Review and management of construction contract schedules

o Schedule preparation for program of projects for use in fiscal planning

• Quality Control

o Quality Assurance Plan used for all capital projects

o Activities defined and audited for engineering products and construction work

• Change Control

o Change Control Board uses formal protocol involving Engineering, Construction

and Contracts managers to ensure that all changes meet the predefined

requirements.

5

Page 3 of 3

These tools are formalized and implemented on all capital projects. They are used by the

technical administration team to manage the work and by the management team to review project

progression and identify systemic problems that must be corrected. The management team trains

technical administrative staff in the use of these tools and shares lessons learned and best

practices with staff to ensure proper management of projects and program improvement.

Prepared By: Capital Program Team

Memo No. 6946

5

Capital Project Process and Controls

Capital Program CommitteeMarch 28, 2019

Agenda Item #5

2

Overview

• Capital Project Consistency

• Project Control Tools

3

Capital Projects

• Improve transit service

o Light Rail extensiono Bus Rapid Transito Bus stop improvementso Track upgrades

• Improve operations and maintenance

o New facility equipmento Rehabilitate track or OCSo Replace aging material and equipment

• Reduce Congestion

o Express Laneso Construct/improve interchanges

• Third party support

o Environmental mitigation

4

Project Controls

Manage project:

• Scope of Work (what to build)

• Budget (cost to build it)

• Schedule (time to build it)

• Quality (ensure meets expectation)

5

Project Phases

Project Control

Focus

Development

Engineering

Operation

Planning

Construction

6

Uniform Process

Highways FacilitiesTransit

Project Controls

All projects use project control protocols

7

Project Controls

• Cost Control

• Schedule Control

• Quality Control

• Document Control

• Change Management

8

Cost Control

• Cost Estimate

• Cost Tracking

• Fund Distribution

• Staffing Plan Cost

• Cost Reporting

9

Cost Breakdown

ProjectLEVEL

1

Construction and

Procurements

Real Estate Labor, Services and

Support

Contingency2

Procurement ROW Services

Prof. Services

Property VTA Labor

3

Construction

10

Cost Control

11

Budget Control

12

Project Schedule

13

Schedule Control

14

Staffing Plan

15

Quality Control

Quality Control in Three Tier Approach

o Quality Assurance Plan used for all capital projects

o Quality Control required by each contractor

o Quality Assurance with audits of work

• Includes risk analysis and lessons learned

16

Document Control

Document Control

o Standard structure

o Electronic system

o Available to all team members

o Used for project management and record keeping

Engineering

Construction

Turnover

17

Change Management

Change Control Board

o Uses formal protocol for

Construction Contracts

o Requires formal review of all

changes over $50k

o Ensures that all changes meet

the predefined requirements

18

Reporting

19

Reporting

Transparent

Real time available to team

Monthly staff/management reports

Semi-Annual Report to Board on each

program (e.g., 2000 Measure A)



Board Meeting: April 4,2019

BOARD MEMORANDUM



THROUGH: General Manager, Nuria I. Fernandez

FROM: Director - Planning & Programming, Chris Augenstein

SUBJECT: FY2020 and FY2021 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal

Policy-Related Action: No Government Code Section 84308 Applies: No

ACTION ITEM

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors adopt the fiscal years 2020 and 2021 Program of

2016 Measure B projects and programs.

BACKGROUND:

On November 8, 2016, the voters of Santa Clara County approved by over a two-thirds vote

Measure B, a 30-year, ½ cent sales tax measure supporting transportation projects and services.

The 2016 Measure B lists and describes the following nine program categories and

corresponding amounts:

Program Category Amount (in 2017 Dollars)

Local Streets & Roads $1.2 Billion

BART Phase II $1.5 Billion*

Bicycle & Pedestrian $250 Million

Caltrain Grade Separations $700 Million

Caltrain Corridor Capacity Improvements $314 Million

Highway Interchanges $750 Million

County Expressways $750 Million

SR 85 Corridor $350 Million

Transit Operations $500 Million

*Capped at 25% of Program Tax Revenue

The ½ cent sales tax collection began on April 1, 2017. The validity of the Measure was

6

Page 2 of 7

challenged in court and funds were held in escrow until January 30, 2019, when all appeals were

exhausted and the Measure was upheld.

The VTA Board of Directors appropriated 2016 Measure B funds for projects and programs as

part of its FY2018 and FY2019 budget adoption on June 1, 2017. These appropriations remain

available to the projects and programs and do not expire at the end of the fiscal year.

FY2018 & FY2019 Adopted 2016 Measure B Budget ($ Millions)

FY18 FY19

Administrative Costs 3.30 3.30

Program Area

FORMULA

BASED

Local Streets & Roads 50.00 40.00

Transit Operations

Enhance Core Network 13.50 13.50

Innovative Transit Models Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares 2.50 2.50

Improve Amenities 1.30

Bicycle & Pedestrian

Education/Encouragement 2.50

Capital Projects 13.33

Planning Projects 0.83

NEED/

CAPACITY

BASED

BART Phase II 0.00

Caltrain Grade Separation 7.00 Caltrain Corridor Capacity 6.30

SR 85 Corridor 12.00

County Expressways 50.00

Highway Interchanges 87.00

Total 308.86

6

Page 3 of 7

DISCUSSION:

VTA staff recommends that the Board of Directors appropriate 2016 Measure B funds for

projects and programs in the following 2016 Measure B program categories for FY2020 and

FY2021.

Proposed FY2020 & FY2021 2016 Measure B Budget ($ Millions)

FY20 FY21

Administrative Costs 3.30 3.30

Program Category

Local Streets & Roads 40.00 40.00

Transit Operations

Enhance Core Network 12.00 12.00

Innovative Transit Models 1.50 1.50

Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares 2.50 2.50

Improve Amenities 1.30


Education/Encouragement 2.50

Capital Projects 13.33

Planning Projects 0.83

BART Phase II 150.00

Caltrain Grade Separation 31.00

Caltrain Corridor Capacity 2.50

SR 85 Corridor 2.50

County Expressways 0.00

Highway Interchanges 119.90

Total $442.46

Administration

The VTA Board appropriated a total of $6.6 million in the FY2018 and FY2019 budgets. Of that

amount, $1.65 million was reimbursed to the Transit Enterprise fund for the cost of the ballot

measure. Approximately $400,000 has been expended on VTA labor for development of the

2016 Measure B program since the election. As the 2016 Measure B Program is in its infancy

and to account for unforeseen activities, staff recommends that the VTA Board continue $3.3

million annual appropriations for FY2020 and FY2021 for administration and oversight of the

Program.

6

Page 4 of 7

Local Streets and Roads

The VTA Board of Directors appropriated $90 million in the FY2018 and FY2019 budget to be

distributed to the cities and the County for roadway maintenance, rehabilitation and complete

streets activities. $40 million was allocated for each fiscal year, with the remaining $10 million

being an estimate for a one-time advance to be distributed to the cities and County based on

collections between April 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017. VTA staff recommend continued

appropriation of $40 million in FY2020 and in FY2021 for this purpose. This would result in a

total Local Streets and Roads appropriation of $170 million for the four-year period.

BART Phase II

No appropriation was requested or made for FY2018 or FY2019. A total of $150 million is

requested for pre-construction activities for FY2020 and FY2021.

Bicycle and Pedestrian

The VTA Board appropriated $16.7 million in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget cycle for this

program category. VTA staff recommends appropriating an additional $16.7 million for FY2020

and FY2021. If approved, the total four-year appropriation would be $33.3 million.

Caltrain Grade Separations

The VTA Board appropriated $7 million in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget cycle for this program

category. VTA staff recommend appropriating an additional $31 million for the FY2020 and

FY2021 cycle. This would result in a total appropriation of $38 million. VTA’s Caltrain Grade

Separation Implementation Plan will require $1 million. The $37 million balance will be

available for cities to advance their project activities.

Caltrain Corridor Capacity Improvements

The VTA Board of Directors approved $6.3 million for FY2018 & FY2019, $2.0 million as part

of the FY2018 and FY2019 adoption and an additional $4.3 million in June 2018. Of this

allocation, $4.3 million is for the locomotive overhaul capital project led by Caltrain, without

which increased service to South County cannot occur. An additional $750,000 will be used to

begin a South County Rail Study that will study potential options for enhanced transit service,

specifically heavy rail service, down to south county and will include Caltrain, Altamont

Corridor Express (ACE), Capital Corridor, the Transportation Agency for Monterey County

(TAMC), the California State Transportation Agency (CALSTA), and the cities of Gilroy,

Morgan Hill, and San Jose.

The balance of the FY18/FY19 allocation and a staff recommended allocation of $2.5 million for

FY2020 & FY2021 for work on the San Jose Diridon Station Plan brings the total appropriation

of this program category for FY18 through FY20 to $8.8 million.

Highway Interchanges

The VTA Board appropriated $87 million in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget cycle for this

6

Page 5 of 7

program category. VTA staff are recommending an additional $119.9 in appropriation for the

FY2020 and FY2021 budget years. Two projects in the FY2020 & FY2021 request, the US 101

Southbound/Trimble Rd./De La Cruz Blvd./Central Expressway Interchange Improvements

Project and the Charcot Avenue Overcrossing Project, are not fully funded for construction.

VTA will work with the City of San Jose to secure the needed funds to complete construction.

Attachment A provides a complete listing of projects, with currently approved and recommended

additional appropriation.

County Expressways

The VTA Board appropriated $50 million for Expressways in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget

cycle. Implementation priorities for the program category are determined by the County of Santa

Clara. County Roads and Airports is currently developing an implementation plan. VTA and

County Roads staff agree that the existing appropriation is sufficient for activities likely to occur

in the next two years. The County’s priority project listing will be presented to the VTA Board

at a future meeting. No additional appropriation is recommended for this budget cycle.

SR 85 Corridor

The VTA Board of Directors appropriated $12 million for this program in the FY2018 &

FY2019 budget cycle. VTA staff are conducting a transit alternatives study for the corridor. The

cost to complete the study is estimated to be $1.4 million. The remaining $10.6 million is

allocated to the implementation of the five noise mitigation pilot projects identified by the SR85

Noise Abatement Study. Once the transit guideway study is complete, initial planning and

feasibility analysis for the improvements that may emerge from the transit guideway study will

need to be conducted. VTA staff recommends $2.5 million for the 2020 & 2021 fiscal years for

these efforts.

Transit Operations

The VTA Board appropriated $33.3 million for this category in the FY2018 & FY2019 budget

cycle, and the Board further refined the distribution at its October 2017 meeting. VTA staff

recommends appropriating the same amount and continuing with the same distribution for

FY2020 and FY2021.

Transit Operations ($ Millions)

Previous New

Transit Operations Sub-category FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 Total FY18 -

FY21

Enhance Core Network $12 $12 $12 $12 $48.0

Innovative Transit $1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $6.0

Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $10.0

Improve Amenities $1.3 $1.3 $2.6

Totals $33.3 $33.3 $66.6

6

Page 6 of 7

ALTERNATIVES:

The VTA Board may appropriate different amounts.

FISCAL IMPACT:

If the Board adopts the program as recommended, $442.46 million in 2016 Measure B funds will

be appropriated for fiscal years 2020 and 2021.

ADVISORY COMMITTEE DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATION

The Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) heard this item at their March 13, 2019 meeting.

Brief discussion was had on how to access currently available funds for the Local Streets and

Roads, Bicycle/Pedestrian Education & Encouragement, and Highway Interchanges Program

Categories. A TAC member requested that the Innovative Transit Service Models Competitive

Grant Program be retroactive to include expenses beginning July 2019 should a project be

awarded funding. Another TAC member requested that reference to the City of Mountain View

be removed from the Caltrain Grade Separation Program Category discussion in the memo, as it

appeared that other cities were not eligible for the proposed FY20/FY21 allocation $31 million.

The TAC unanimously recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item, with an

amendment to remove the reference to the City of Mountain View in the Caltrain Grade

Separation Program Category discussion in the memo.

The Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC) heard this item at their March 13, 2019 meeting.

Clarification was provided on the Noise Abatement Program in the Highway Program Category

and the noise abatement pilot projects that will be constructed on SR85. A CAC member

requested VTA adopt a policy to separate at-grade crossings throughout the county.

The CAC unanimously recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item.

The Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) heard this item at their March 13, 2019

meeting. Discussion was had on the following: 1) Coordinate projects as best as possible to be

cost effect and cause as minimal disruption as possible; 2) Update on increased Caltrain service

to south county; 3) Request VTA to adopt a policy to separate all at-grade crossings; 4) The

criteria development and scoring process for the Bicycle/Pedestrian Capital Projects Competitive

Grant Program; and 5) Doubling the Bicycle/Pedestrian allocations for the early years.

The BPAC, with three no-votes, recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item,

with an amendment to emphasize funding for the Education & Encouragement sub-category of

the Bicycle/Pedestrian Program Category.

The Policy Advisory Committee (PAC) heard this item at their March 14, 2019 meeting.

Discussion was had on the following: 1) Why 2016 Measure B funds were being used on

6

Page 7 of 7

Caltrain locomotive overhauls; 2) Schedule for increased Caltrain service to south county; 3)

Clarification that the Local Streets & Roads formula would not change; 4) Request that language

in the Caltrain Grade Separation Program Category discussion state that funds allocated for

FY20/FY21 be available for all three eligible cities. Staff clarified to the committee that the

Board of Directors approved the allocation of 2016 Measure B funds in 2018 for the Caltrain

locomotive overhaul project. Staff will provide the schedule for increased Caltrain service to

south county to the PAC. PAC also requested a roadmap of 2016 Measure B funds, with

expected expenditures and funding models for each program categories, for future years.

The PAC unanimously recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item with the

following amendments: 1) Provide a roadmap of 2016 Measure B funds 2) Clarify the Caltrain

Grade Separation program category discussion to state that funds allocated for FY20/FY21 are

available for all three eligible cities; and 3) Express the strongest opposition to using $4.3 million

of 2016 Measure B funds for the Caltrain Locomotive Overhaul project.

STANDING COMMITTEE DISCUSSION/RECOMMENDATION:

The Congestion Management Programming & Planning (CMPP) Committee heard this item at

their March 21, 2019 meeting. Discussion was had on the status and schedule of the five SR 85

Noise Abatement pilot projects. A member requested that the Highway Interchange Program

Category be revised to reflect a project in their jurisdiction. Staff stated that the Highway

Interchange Program Category would be revised for the Board of Directors meeting, as there are

currently moving parts to address.

The CMPP unanimously recommended that the Board of Directors approve this item, with the

understanding that the Highway Interchange Program Category be revised.

Prepared by: Jane Shinn

Memo No. 6894

ATTACHMENTS:

• MT6894_AttachmentA_Proposed_FY20FY21_HwyProjects (PDF)

6

Proposed 2016 Measure B (MB) Highway Interchanges Program FY20 and FY21 Projects and Allocation

ATTACHMENT A: DETAILED 2016 MEASURE B HIGHWAY PROGRAM BUDGET REQUEST

ID Route Project Title

Total Project Cost ($M)

A

Jurisdiction Implementing

Agency

MB FY 18 - FY 19 Appropriation

MB

FY 20 - FY 21 Request

FY 18-21 Total

A 17SR 17 Southbound/Hamilton Ave. Off-Ramp Widening $2.0 Campbell Campbell $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000

B 17SR 17/San Tomas Expressway Interim Improvements $1.0 Campbell Campbell $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000

C AllHwy. Transportation Operations System/Freeway Performance Initiative Phase 1 & 2 $54.0 Countywide VTA $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000

D AllNoise Abatement Program (Countywide)

$50.0 Countywide VTA $4.0000 $0.0000 $4.0000

E 280I-280/Wolfe Rd. Interchange Improvements

$86.0 Cupertino VTA $6.0000 $1.5000 $7.5000

F 280I-280 Northbound: Second Exit Lane to Foothill Expressway $4.2

Cupertino, Los Altos

VTA $3.5000 $0.0000 $3.5000

G 17Highway 17 Corridor Congestion Relief including SR 17/SR 9 interchange $50.0 Los Gatos VTA $0.0000 $5.4000 $5.4000

H 152US 101/SR 25 Interchange (ENV/PS&E)

$65.0 Gilroy VTA $2.0000 $8.0000 $10.0000

I 101US 101/Buena Vista Ave. Interchange Improvements

$35.0 Gilroy VTA $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000

J 237Calaveras Boulevard Widening - Near-term improvements $2.0 Milpitas VTA $1.0000 $0.8000 $1.8000

K 237SR 237 Westbound On-Ramp at Middlefield Road

$50.0 Mt View VTA $0.0000 $4.0000 $4.0000

L 101US 101 Interchanges Improvements: San Antonio Rd. to Charleston Rd./Rengstorff Ave. $35.0

Palo Alto, Mt View

VTA $1.0000 $1.0000 $2.0000

M 101US 101 Southbound/Trimble Rd./De La Cruz Blvd./Central Expwy. Interchange Improvements $60.0 San Jose VTA $4.0000 $35.0000 $39.0000

N 101Double Lane Southbound US 101 off-ramp to Southbound SR 87 $3.0 San Jose VTA $1.5000 $1.0000 $2.5000

O 101US 101/Mabury Rd./Taylor St. Interchange Construction $95.0 San Jose San Jose $2.0000 $0.0000 $2.0000

P 280I-280/Winchester Blvd. Interchange Improvements

$90.0 San Jose VTA $3.0000 $6.0000 $9.0000

Q 87SR 87 Technology-based Corridor Improvements - (SB 87 Charcot On-ramp HOV Bypass) $3.0 San Jose VTA $1.0000 $1.7000 $2.7000

R 101US 101/Zanker Rd./Skyport Dr./Fourth St. Interchange Improvements $162.0 San Jose VTA $3.0000 $6.0000 $9.0000

S 101US 101/Old Oakland Rd. Interchange Improvements

$25.0 San Jose San Jose $1.0000 $0.0000 $1.0000

T 101US 101/Blossom Hill Rd. Interchange Improvements

$32.0 San Jose San Jose $4.0000 $24.1000 $28.1000

U 880Charcot Overcrossing

$50.0 San Jose San Jose $12.0000 $25.0000 $37.0000

V 237SR 237/Mathilda Ave. and US 101/Mathilda Ave. Interchange Improvement + follow-up Landscaping $47.0 Sunnyvale VTA $34.0000 $0.0000 $34.0000

Highway Program Management/Oversight VTA $0.0000 $0.4000 $0.4000

Totals $87.0000 $119.9000 $206.90

N:\ProgrammingAndGrants\2016 Measure B\Administrative\FY20FY21_Budget\Copy of Copy of Hwy_Project_List_2016_Envision Sales Tax Measure 2 year budget_Local Contribution_2020‐2021 ver8 Page 1

6.a

FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B

Funding ProposalCapital Program CommitteeMarch 28, 2019

Item #6

2

2016 Measure B Program Overview

• Nine Program Categories

• Collection begins April 1, 2017

• January 30, 2019 – Validity of the

Measure is upheld

• FY18/FY19 funds available now

3

Adopted FY18/FY19 2016 Measure B Program

• Local Streets & Roads - $90 million

• BART Phase II - $0

• Bicycle & Pedestrian - $16.7 million

• Caltrain Grade Separation - $7 million

• Caltrain Corridor Capacity Impvts - $6.3

mil

• Highway Interchanges - $87 million

• County Expressways - $50 million

• SR 85 Corridor - $12 million

• Transit Operations - $33.3 million

• Administrative Costs - $6.6 million

Adopted ($ millions) Proposed ($ millions) TOTAL

Program Category FY18 FY19 FY20 FY21 ($ millions)

Administrative Costs $3.3 $3.3 $3.3 $3.3 $13.2

Local Streets & Roads $50.0 $40.0 $40.0 $40.0 $170.0

Transit Operations

Enhance Core Network $12.0 $12.0 $12.0 $12.0 $48.0

Innovative Transit Models $1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $1.5 $6.0

Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $2.5 $10.0

Improve Amenities $1.3 $1.3 $2.6

Bicycle and Pedestrian

Education/Encouragement $2.5 $1.25 $1.25 $5.0

Capital Projects $13.33 $13.33 $26.66

Planning Projects $0.83 $0.83 $1.66

BART Phase II $0.0 $150.0 $150.0

Caltrain Grade Separations $7.0 $31.0 $38.0

Caltrain Corridor Capacity Improvements $6.3 $2.5 $8.8

SR 85 Corridor $12.0 $2.5 $14.5

County Expressways $50.0 $0.0 $50.0

Highway Interchanges $87.0 $119.9 $206.9

Total $308.86 $442.46 $751.32

5

Proposed FY20/FY21 Local Streets & Roads Program

• FY20 - $40 million




6

Proposed FY20/FY21 BART Phase II Program

• FY20/FY21 - $150 million

• FY18/FY19 - $0

7

Proposed FY20/FY21 Bicycle & Pedestrian Program

• Three sub-categories:

∙ Education & Encouragement - Formula

∙ Capital projects - Competitive

∙ Planning projects - Competitive

• FY20 - $8.3 million




8

Proposed FY20/FY21 Caltrain Grade Separation

Program



• Implementation Plan - moving

forward

• Funds to advance project activities

9

Proposed FY20/FY21 Caltrain Corridor Capacity

Program

• FY20/FY21 - $2.5 million


• Funding for San Jose Diridon Station

Plan

• Caltrain Locomotive Overhaul

10

Proposed FY20/FY21 Highway Interchanges Program

• FY20/FY21 - $119.9 million


• Most projects in early development

stages

• Includes VTA and City-delivered

projects

• Noise Abatement Program

• Increase of $5.3 million from February

11

Proposed FY20/FY21 County Expressways Program



• County developing prioritization

plan

12

Proposed FY20/FY21 SR85 Corridor Program



• Initial planning & feasibility analysis

for results of Transit Guideway

Study

• Transit Guideway Study

• Five noise abatement pilot projects

13

Proposed FY20/FY21 Transit Operations Budget

• Four sub-categories

∙ Enhance Core Network - VTA

∙ Innovative Transit Models -Competitive

∙ Expand Mobility & Affordable Fares -VTA

∙ Improve amenities - VTA





14

Questions?



Board Meeting: N/A

BOARD MEMORANDUM




FROM: Chief Planning and Engineering Officer, Carolyn M. Gonot

SUBJECT: Policy Direction on Remaining 2000 Measure A Projects to Ensure Alignment

of FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget with Board Priorities

Policy-Related Action: Yes Government Code Section 84308 Applies: No

ACTION ITEM

RECOMMENDATION:

Reaffirm previous or provide new policy direction on the following remaining 2000 Measure A

projects to ensure that the proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget aligns with the Board of

Directors' priorities:

(A) Mineta San Jose Airport People Mover;


(C) Eastridge to BART Regional Connector Light Rail Extension.

BACKGROUND:

In November 2000, Santa Clara County voters approved Measure A, a 30-year half cent sales tax

devoted to specified public transit capital improvement projects and operations. The Measure A

ballot listed 14 specific projects or project areas.

The VTA Board of Directors is responsible for implementation of the 2000 Measure A Program

and for all policy-related decisions including the composition, implementation schedule and

funding level of projects.

Collection of the 2000 Measure A sales tax began on April 1, 2006 and will continue for 30

years until March 2036. The original estimate of total revenue at the time of the ballot was

approximately $14 billion. Due to two economic recessions and a revised, more conservative

revenue estimate, the current total revenue estimate for the 30-year tax is now approximately

7

Page 2 of 9

$7.4 billion. Due to the significantly decreased total revenue projection, the VTA Board of

Directors has made a series of policy decisions to prioritize projects for investment, development

and delivery. Additional policy decisions will be necessary over the Measure’s remaining

lifespan.

The Board of Directors has twice (September 2000 and August 2007) designated the Capital

Expressway Light Rail Extension to Eastridge Mall project as VTA’s next highest priority

following the BART Silicon Valley Extension.

Since 2000 Measure A passage over 18 years ago, several major factors have changed that may

affect the Board’s policy decision on how remaining 2000 Measure A projects are delivered.

Examples of these many significant factors include, but are not limited to: changes in

demographics and ridership; local land use changes; environmental factors; technological

advances such as autonomous vehicles; project funding opportunities and challenges; ride

sharing (Uber and Lyft) and bike sharing; and emerging innovative transportation solutions.

DISCUSSION:

The purpose of this item is twofold: (1) provide the CPC and Board with information on the

current status and factors affecting delivery of three of the remaining Measure projects; and (2)

CPC provides policy direction, as needed, to ensure that 2000 Measure A projects in the

proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget align with the Board of Directors’ priorities. The

three specific projects that will be reviewed in detail in the following are:

(A) San Jose Mineta Airport People Mover


(C) Eastridge to BART Regional Connector Light Rail Extension

(A) San Jose Mineta Airport People Mover (APM)

Project Description

The 2000 Measure A Ballot language mentions an airport people mover in two separate

projects. The first is part of the BART project language (italics and bold added).

“Extend BART from Fremont through Milpitas to Downtown San Jose and the Santa

Clara Caltrain Station, specifically, To build a BART Extension from Fremont to

Milpitas, San Jose and Santa Clara with a major connection to the Tasman Light Rail

line at the Milpitas BART Station. In San Jose to include a BART subway section with

stations at San Jose State University, the new San Jose City Hall, Downtown San Jose

at Market Street, San Jose Arena and the Diridon Multimodal Station connecting to

Caltrain, ACE, Amtrak, the Vasona Light Rail line and VTA bus service. In Santa

Clara, to serve Santa Clara University, and the Caltrain Station with a people mover

connection to San Jose International Airport.”

7

Page 3 of 9

The second project is described as follows.

“Provide Connections from San Jose International Airport to BART, Caltrain and the

VTA Light Rail, specifically, to build a people mover rail line connecting the airport

passenger terminals directly with BART, Caltrain and the VTA Light Rail line.”

Status

Since passage of Measure A, the airport people mover has been studied three times. All

have been led by the City of San Jose and the first two studies were funded through

Measure A. The first study in 2000/2001 was performed by Lea & Elliot and looked at

traditional people mover technology to connect the Metro/Airport Light Rail Station to the

airport with additional circulation within the airport. The second study completed by ARUP

in 2012 expanded the prior work scope to include a connection to the Santa Clara BART

Station. The study also included extensive review of advanced technologies, including pod

cars, by the NASA Aerospace Group. The last study completed by ARUP for the City of

San Jose was done to review alignments from Diridon Station to the airport and consider

the potential new markets from high speed rail.

As a next step, VTA had planned to develop a Business Plan for an airport people mover.

This plan would mainly focus on a review of previous alignments, ridership and

technologies along with the capital and operating costs and potential funding and financing

mechanisms. The Business Plan would provide the foundational information for the VTA

Board to determine the most appropriate next steps.

Factors Affecting Project

At this point, the development of the Business Plan is on hold for a few primary reasons:

1. City of San Jose staff, upon request of Mayor Liccardo (see Attachment A), is

developing a Request for Information (RFI) to explore the viability of a public-

private partnership with a private company for a Diridon to airport connection via

tunnel or viaduct. VTA staff is cooperating with the City on the development of the

RFI to be issued this spring. Results of the RFI are expected in late 2019.

2. Development of the Diridon Intermodal Station Concept Plan also includes space

for a potential airport connector from Diridon. While no technical work on the

connector itself is included in the Concept Plan, conclusions made in this process

may provide input to the next phases of study for an airport connector.

3. VTA legal staff needs to review the original Measure A language that was quite

specific regarding location and technology (“people mover rail line”) to ensure the

eligibility of the Measure A funds for potential options.

It should be noted that a total of $5 million of Measure A funds have been allocated to the

APM project in previous budgets. A total of $2 million has been expended in the past

studies, leaving $3 million remaining for future work.

7

Page 4 of 9

Recommendation

(A1) Staff recommends that development of the Business Plan stay on hold until the

City’s RFI process is completed later this year and the results evaluated. VTA staff

will continue to be an active participant in this process and will keep the VTA

Board informed throughout the year on the progress.

Alternatives

(A2) The Board could direct staff to start the Business Plan process now. This would

likely require the issuance of a Request for Proposal (RFP) to obtain an experienced

consultant to develop the Business Plan.

(B) Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track

Project Description

The current project scope has discreet elements related to extending the line and improving

the existing infrastructure. The Green Line (aka Winchester) extension would add a 1.5

mile extension to the Vasona Junction Station (transit center and parking) in Los Gatos

(Winchester Boulevard at SR 85) and a Hacienda Station with parking in Campbell. There

is also the potential for an in-fill station at West San Carlos.

The scope includes conceptual engineering for improving the existing infrastructure to

include fully double tracking the corridor, expanding platforms to accommodate three-car

trains, and parking expansion at the full Winchester Station lot.

As background, due to funding limitations when Vasona LRT was originally built, some

segments of the line were built as single-track, some station platforms were limited in

length to handle only two-car trains, and the park-and-ride lot at Winchester Station was

undersized.

7

Page 5 of 9

In March 2014, the VTA Board of Directors approved a State and Federal environmental

document for portions of the next phases Vasona LRT improvements. This environmental

document included a double track extension to a new Vasona Junction Station and park-

and-ride, relocating the freight tracks, expanding the Winchester park-and-ride, two

substations, a new Hacienda Station and park-and-ride, and extending existing stations for

three-car trains.

Status

• In May 2018, VTA entered into a contract with Kimley Horn in an amount of $1.03

million to perform additional feasibility studies to be completed by June 2019. The

studies cover the extension to Vasona Junction, platform extensions, double tracking

the single tracked segments, and the feasibility of temporal separation with the

adjacent freight rail tracks.


• The ridership estimate for extending the Green Line by two stations (Hacienda and

Vasona Junction) results in 717 total new boardings in 2035. The two new stations

would account for 1,643 boardings, but the Winchester Station (the current end of the

line) would lose 926 passengers as these riders shift to the new stations. (Vasona

Corridor Final Supplemental EIR January 2014)

• This project has a current Measure A budget allocation of $40 million. This amount

was planned to be used for the aforementioned feasibility studies, the start of final

design if the Board decided to move forward with this project, and right-of-way

procurement as necessary. VTA did attempt to purchase the nursery adjacent to the

full Winchester Station park & ride but were out bid.

• Land use development along the proposed extension necessary to support light rail

service has not advanced. For example, the Campbell City Council did not approve

the Dell Avenue Area Plan, which would have created a large mixed use residential

and tech office area with the Hacienda Station as a major hub.

• The Green Line (Vasona Corridor) is directly affected by the Diridon Intermodal

Station Concept Plan now underway. The studies in the Concept Plan include

possible new alignments for the Green line on how it approaches and travels through

the Diridon Station. The potential changes for the Green Line in the Diridon Station

area could impact the existing line operations and infrastructure.

• The estimated design and construction cost for all improvements to the Green Line

(Vasona Corridor) is estimated to be $401 million. This includes the following

elements, some of which could be advanced separately.

Platform Extensions $48 million

Constrained Double Tracking $39 million

Race to Fruitdale Bridges/Double Track $27 million

Hamilton Station Double Tracking $52 million

San Carlos Double Tracking $31 million

West San Carlos Station $13 million

Total to Improve Current Line $210 million

7

Page 6 of 9

Extension to Vasona $87 million

Hacienda Station $23 million

Hacienda Park and Ride $17 million

End of Line Pocket Track $14 million

Vasona Park and Ride $50 million

Total to Complete Extension $191 million

More detail on the current feasibility studies will be available and presented to the VTA

Board in June 2019 as the final documentation and report is now being developed.

Specific recommendation will be made at that time, but staff suggests the preliminary

options that follow.

Recommendation

(B1) Staff recommends placing this project on hold until development of the Diridon

Intermodal Station Concept Plan is complete, a single preferred option is selected,

and the future impact on the Vasona Corridor can be assessed. The selection of a

Single Preferred Option should occur this fall.

Alternatives

(B2) The Board could advance one or more elements of the infrastructure improvements.

These will be presented in the Feasibility Study Final report.

(C) Eastridge to BART Regional Connector Light Rail Extension (EBRC)

Project Description

The Eastridge to BART Regional Connector (EBRC) is part of the Downtown East Valley

Improvements (DTEV) in East San Jose. This project has been a Board identified priority

since before Measure A was approved and continues to receive Board support with a series

of board action that are identified subsequently in this memo. The EBRC was formerly

called Capitol Expressway Light Rail (CELR) Project.

7

Page 7 of 9

Previous project highlights include:

• August 2000 - Planning work began with the Preferred Investment Strategy for the

Downtown East Valley Study Area that included three primary components, one of

which was, “Light rail transit along the entire length of the Capitol Expressway.”

This strategy was the result of the Downtown East Valley Major Investment Study.

• September 2000 - VTA Board adopts Resolution No. 00.09.58 designating the

Downtown/East Valley Transit Improvement Program as VTA’s next priority after

the 1996 Measure A+B Transportation Improvement projects.

• November 2000 - Voters approve 2000 Measure A Program that includes a project

for “light rail from downtown San Jose to the East Valley.”

• May 2005 - Original environmental document approved, with updates and changes in

August 2007, June 2010 and March 2014.

• August 2007 - VTA Board reaffirms the Board support for the Capitol Expressway

Light Rail Extension to Eastridge Mall and the continuation of planning and design

activities in coordination with the review and approval of the Measure A Expenditure

Plan.

• June 2010 - VTA approves environmental document addendum (State CEQA Revised

Addendum to the SEIR) for the phasing of the Pedestrian & Bus improvements as

Phase 1. Phase 1 complete with the opening of the transit center in Spring 2015.

• June 2016 - VTA Board appropriates an additional $50 million of Measure A funds to

complete design, acquire right-of-way and relocate utilities. The scope included light

rail in the median and aerial at Story and at-grade at Ocala and Cunningham

intersections.

• October 2016 - Board approves an additional $177 million in Measure A funds to the

project.

• May 2018 - Board approves staff recommendation to perform environmental analysis

of the light rail geometry change to full aerial alignment. The new alignment needs

increased funding of $76 million for construction.

• October 2018 - Draft Second Supplemental Environmental Impact Report was made

available and circulated for public comment.

• When referring to the total Measure A cost, several projects are included in the

DTEV line item, with the following breakdown:

Project Cost Status

Conceptual DTEV Overall (P0375) $11M Closed

Original (P0476) $56M Closed

Phase 1A pedestrian improvement (P0743) $19M Closed

Phase 1B bus improvement (P0744) $60M Closed

Phase 2 EBRC light rail (P0787)* $453M Underway

Total project cost for DTEV $599M

* $299M Board authorized to date with $11M spent to date

7

Page 8 of 9

• Operations and Maintenance Cost: $2M to $3M per year

Project Improvements

• 2.4 mile Light Rail Transit (LRT) from Alum Rock Station to Eastridge Transit

Center

• LRT in median of Capitol Expressway from Capitol Avenue to south of Cunningham

Avenue; side running over Tully Road to Eastridge Transit Center

• Elevated station at Story Road and at-grade station at Eastridge (Ocala Station

eliminated in previous environmental document update)

• Grade separation at Story Road, Ocala Avenue, Cunningham Avenue and Tully Road

• LRT requires removal of two High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lanes between Story

Road and Tully Road

• Ridership estimate for new daily boardings (bus and rail)

➢ Year 2023: 1,235 for Light Rail and 940 Total

➢ Year 2043: 2,212 Light Rail and 1,316 Total

Current Project Schedule

• Certify the Second Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) in June 2019

• Begin property acquisition in July 2019

• Begin to enter into utility relocation agreements in July 2019

• Begin utility relocation for locations not requiring property acquisition (median water

line) in fall 2019

• Complete engineering at end of 2019

• Complete property acquisition for utility relocation May 2020

• Begin utility relocation at locations requiring property acquisition in June 2020

• Complete acquisition for light rail construction in October 2021

• Advertise light rail construction in early 2021 with award in summer 2021

• Complete construction in 2025


• Environmental impacts

o Permanent traffic

o Temporary traffic during construction

o Noise and vibration during construction

o Vibration during operations

o Air quality during construction

7

Page 9 of 9

• Schedule risk for utility relocation

• Schedule risk for property acquisition (especially Federal Aviation Administration

(FAA) approval)

• Coordination and integration with potential closing and development of Reid

Hillview Airport (airport projected to close in 2032)

Recommendation

(C1) Continue implementing the current Board policy direction of completing all

activities currently planned for environmental clearance, and if the Board certifies

the second supplemental environmental impact report, then proceed with property

acquisition, utility relocation and engineering.

Alternatives

(C2) The Board could direct staff to present the second supplemental environmental

impact report for its consideration and defer other items until completion of a

proposed transit system technology / innovation study (i.e., consider vehicle

technology) and further direction by the CPC/Board. Items to defer may include one

or more of the following options:

a. Engineering (includes bridge design);

b. Engineering, property acquisition and utility relocation;

c. Property acquisition and utility relocation; and

d. Utility relocation.

Next Steps

Any change to existing policy direction on the three projects provided by the CPC will be

incorporated to ensure the FY 2020 & FY 2021 Capital Budget aligns with the Board of

Directors’ priorities.

Following the Capital Program Committee’s March action, the Proposed Capital Budget will be

combined with the Proposed Operating Budget to form the Proposed FY 2020 and FY 2021

Biennial Budget that will be presented at the Board of Directors’ April Workshop. The Board

will then consider adoption of the Proposed FY 2020 and FY 2021 Biennial Budget at its June 6,

2019 meeting.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact as a result of any of the recommended actions. However, should

the CPC request a change to any of the projects, those would be incorporated into the FY 2020 &

FY 2021 Capital Budget to ensure it aligns with the Board of Directors’ priorities.

Prepared by: Capital Program Team

Memo No. 6945

ATTACHMENTS:

• A--Memo from SJ Mayor Liccardo on Building SJ Central Station 2-4-19 (PDF)

7

GTYOF ~ SANJOSE CAl'rit\L OF SI LICON VALLEY

TO: CITY COUNCIL

SUBJECT: SEE BELOW

Approved

COUNCIL AGENDA: 2/5/2019 ITEM: 6.1

Memorandum FROM: Mayor Sam Liccardo

DATE: February 4, 2019

l--■l _ ■---IG A SAN JOSE CENTRAL STATION FOR THE FUTURE

RECOMMENDATION

As part of a future study session on rail planning in San Jose, or a separate update to Council:

1. Present for discussion various technology and alignment options for connecting the San Jose International Airport to Diridon Station. The same discussion may or may not include other potential corridors to Diridon Station, depending on staffs readiness;

2. Assess the extent to which VT A can use 2000 Measure A funds, or other fund sources, to fund study, conceptual design, or preliminary design of transit connectors to the Airport, along San Carlos-Stevens Creek, or Monterey Road.

BACKGROUND

The integration of multiple transit lines in our central station presents us with a complex and critically important set of tasks. Nobody wants to make this more complex or difficult, but if we' re planning the region's Grand Central Station for the next century, we shouldn't do so wearing blinders to the future.

Several other transit connections are worth exploration, and we need to build a station with "room" to grow for additional portals to our region. As Bay Area regional leaders contemplate a regional transportation measure in the next four to six years, it would serve us well to get far along in a study and conceptual design, to ensure we'll be ready for a larger funding push in the near future. I do not desire to distract us from the very important work we have before us, but I want to ensure that we're not ignoring the importance of continuing to think big.

A. The Long-Sought Airport Connector For two consecutive years, the Mineta San Jose International Airport has been the fastest growing airport in the United States. City and regional leaders have long sought a means of connecting the Airport to the rest of our emerging transit system, and such a proposal comprised a key part of the 2000 Measure A, a countywide sales tax approved by more than 70 percent of the voters. In 2000, I left my job as an attorney to work on the measure as a communications coordinator on Measure A, and I recall polling showing that its "people mover rail line

7.a

COUNCIL AGENDA February 4, 20 I 9 Subject: Building A San Jose Central Station For The Future Page 2 of3

connecting the airport passenger terminals directly with BART, Caltrain, and the VTA Light Rail line" rose near the top of voter surveys about the various Measure A component projects. An Airport connector to Diridon could serve another important priority as well: identifying opportunities for parking to serve the Arena and the rest of the emerging "Grand Central Station." Parking has become a bone of contention with our longstanding Arena partners, the San Jose Sharks, and we need to find long-term solutions that do not require tens of millions of wasteful expenditures on parking infrastructure that will likely become obsolete within a decade. The Airport has a large supply of parking, the demand for which will decline with the continued emergence ofride sharing and autonomy. Over time, the Airport could become a "car port" for those needing to hop on a High-Speed Rail train or attend a concert, with a rapid, futuristic ride to the Arena's front door.

Since the passage of Measure A in 2000, the City, VTA, and various partners have analyzed multiple options for a transit connection to the airport, ranging from standard rail to futuristic personal rapid transit (PRT) concepts. Although plans from the ballot measure generally contemplated connections to the Santa Clara BART or to North First Street Light Rail stations, the cost for standard rail seemed excessive- some $800 million, according to an estimate a halfdecade ago-and PRT appeared ill-suited to a corridor with relatively light projected ridership.

In the last eighteen months, I began-and DOT has continued-communications with senior officials at the Boring Company, Elon Musk' s tunnel-construction firm, about the possibility of boring a 2-mile tunnel between the Airport and the Diridon Station area. From those conversations, the possibility of a private-public partnership has emerged that could dramatically reduce the cost of tunnel construction, with some modification of transitional transit models. The Boring Company, as many know, is currently testing the use of individual automotive vehicles (modified Teslas, of course) along a flat surface in a tunnel in Southern California.

We could explore, through a public Request for Information (RFI), the viability of a publicprivate partnership with Boring or other private competitors for such a connection, by tunnel or viaduct. Such an RFI should explicitly mention the need to abide by longstanding City policies, such as prevailing wage. Because non-rail transit allows for greater flexibility of design and construction, we might explore options that would not penetrate the already-complex maze of transit alignments through Diridon, such as a portal at Arena Green, with a subsequent connection into the core of the central station.

As part of a future study session on the Diridon Integrated Station Concept Plan, or through a separate update to Council, City and VT A staff should return with potential options for connecting the Airport to Diridon Station. We should also flesh out the extent to which such a connection to Diridon would be eligible for 2000 Measure A funding (with a legal analysis of whether the ballot measure is restricted to as to the precise location of the line), and the extent to which Airport user fees might fund some portion of the extension.

B. The West San Carlos-Stevens Creek Corridor An even more complex-but equally vital- undertaking would connect Cupertino, Santa Clara, and San Jose along the San Carlos-Stevens Creek corridor. This corridor could link major health,

7.a

COUNCIL AGENDA February 4, 2019 Subject: Building A San Jose Central Station For The Future Page 3 of3

education, employment, retail, and housing destinations in our region, including De Anza College, Main Street Cupertino, Vallco, Valley Fair and Santana Row, the Apple headquarters, and three San Jose Urban Villages, and with a short detour, Valley Medical Center.

Measure A in 2000 also committed funding to the study, design, and construction of light rail options throughout the region, including corridors along Capitol Expressway, El Camino Real, Vasona, and Stevens Creek. Again, it would be helpful to know whether there is any flexibility in the programmatic allocation of that funding to study and perform preliminary design of different transit modes along the same corridor.

C. Future Portals: to Monterey Road and Beyond

While there is no regional plan or funding source for a transit line along our Monterey Road corridor, a very preliminary conceptual study of a bus-rapid-transit line has been contemplated. A committee headed by Councilmembers Jimenez and Esparza will be exploring some conceptual options as part of a series of other critical issues facing residents and businesses along that corridor. VT A has also begun a countywide High-Capacity Transit Study to identify the places where demand for this service exists and what kinds of transit technologies would be most appropriate to serve them. DOT and VT A staff may identify other critical corridors for study or preliminary analysis, particularly as we contemplate a potential regional funding source for new transit development.

Recognizing that funding and planning is many years off, we should acknowledge, through explicit Station design, the desire for scalability to enable new portals to the transit center as concepts evolve and funding emerges. I particularly appreciate VTA's role in setting a comprehensive vision and action plan for our region and ask that VT A leadership and staff continue to work with the City to rapidly advance work on regional transit, particularly these critical connections. I thank the City, VTA, and other partner agency staff for their willingness to consider these options amid all that they're juggling today, and I look forward to undertaking this exciting exploration with our Council and our community.

•

7.a

Policy Direction on Remaining

2000 Measure A Projects

Capital Program CommitteeMarch 28, 2019

Item #7

2

(A) Airport People Mover (APM)

(B) Vasona Junction Light Rail Extension/Double Track

Remaining 2000 Measure A Projects

(C) Capital Expressway Light Rail (CELR) Extension, Phase II – Eastridge to

BART Regional Connector (EBRC)

Airport People Mover

4

Previous Studies Overview

2000-2001: Measure A funded - City of San Jose (CSJ) lead, Lea

and Elliott prime consultant

2012: Measure A funded - CSJ lead, 1) ARUP Prime; 2) NASA

Report on Automated Transit Network (status of new technology)

2016: CSJ lead and funded, Diridon connection

VTA Measure A Budget

Total $5 million

$2 million expended on first two studies, $3 million remaining

APM - Original Alignment

5

2001 Study – CSJ Lead

Original concept to connect

Metro Light Rail Station

with SJC and also use APM

as an internal airport

circulator.

Future BART/

Caltrain

Station

Future APM/ LRT

Station

Centralized

Terminal

Existing

Terminal A

Short Term

Parking/Rental

Car Garage

Phase 1

Phase 2

Phase 3 (Option A)

Phase 3 (Option B)

VTA LRT

Caltrain

Legend

6

7

ATN Alignment

8

2012 Studies – CSJ Lead

Automated Transit Network

(ATN)

Metro LRT to airport (SJC)

terminals and parking

garages (Phase 1), then to

BART Santa Clara (Phase 2)

Capital: $747M to $1.2B

Operating: +$9M to -$6M

Uncertainties regarding new

technologies

ATN Concept at SJC Terminal

9

ATN Concept at SJC Terminal

10

APM to Diridon

11

2016 San Jose Study

Study new alignment to

connect Diridon to SJC

Expanded market by

including HSR connectivity

“Base” alignment does not

include Santa Clara BART

Capital: $380M to $830M

No operating costs estimates

12

Recommendation

Business Plan stay on hold pending completion of City of San

Jose Request for Interest in “APM” to Diridon and connection

from downtown San Jose along Stevens Creek to Cupertino

Vasona Junction Light Rail

Extension/Double Track

14

Scope

• Review 1.5 mile extension to the Vasona Junction Station (transit

center and parking) in Los Gatos and a Hacienda station with

parking in Campbell.

• Conceptual engineering for improving the existing infrastructure:

fully double tracking the corridor plus temporal separation

operation with existing freight

expanding platforms to accommodate three-car trains

parking expansion at the full Winchester Station lot

15

Budget and Status

• Measure A budget allocation of $43 million

• May 2018 - VTA contracted with Kimley Horn for $1.03 million

• Final study results to VTA Board in June 2019

Project Scope

Current Line Improvements

Estimated Design/PM/ROW/Construction CostPlatform Extensions $48MDouble Tracking without structural impact $39MDouble track Race to Fruitdale $27MHamilton Double Tracking $52MSan Carlos Double Tracking $31MSan Carlos Station (proposed) $13M

Total: $212M

Existing Single-Track OperationsLength: 12,000 feetTime in Single Track: 5 min 29 sec

Vasona Junction Extension

• Previous Project cost estimate was $176 Million (Vasona EIR 2014)

• Ridership estimates (Vasona EIR 2014) 2,900 (700 new boardings)

Estimated Design/PM/ROW/Construction Cost

Base $87MHacienda Station $23MHacienda PNR $17M600’ Pocket Track $14MVasona Junction Station $50M

Total: $191M

19

Recommendation

Place project on hold until development of the Diridon

Intermodal Station Concept Plan is complete, a single

preferred option is selected, and the future impact on the

Vasona Corridor can be assessed.

Selection of a Single Preferred Option should occur this Fall.

Capitol Expressway Light Rail Extension –

Phase II (EBRC)

21

Project Overview

• Project Description

• Project History

• Issues

• Next Steps

22

Project Description

EBRC is Phase II of Capital Expressway Light Rail Extension

• 2.4 mile double track LRT from Alum Rock Station to Eastridge Transit Center

• LRT in median of Capitol Expressway from Capitol Avenue through Cunningham Avenue; side running through Tully Road to Eastridge

• Elevated station at Story Road and at grade station at Eastridge

• Grade separation at Story Rd., Ocala Ave., Cunningham Ave., and Tully Rd.

• LRT uses median and requires removal of HOV lane between Story Road and Tully Road

23

Photo Simulation – Before and After

Prior to Project After Project

24

Project History

2000Board adopts resolution prioritizing Downtown/East Valley transit improvement

2000Voters approve Measure A with “Light rail from downtown San Jose to East Valley.”

2005Board certifies environmental document; updates in 2007, 2010 and 2014

2007Board reaffirms support for Capitol Expressway Light Rail Extension

2016Board approves $50M and $177M funding commitments from Measure A

2018Board directs analysis of impacts for light rail geometry change; approves funding strategy

25

Phased Approach

Phase 1 Construction complete

• Pedestrian and Bus Improvements

Sidewalk, pedestrian lighting and landscape

Bus stops at Story Road and Ocala Avenue

New transit center at Eastridge

Phase 2 Underway

• Light rail extension to Eastridge

26

Pedestrian and Bus Improvements

27

Project Challenges

• Traffic impact from lane removal

• Right of way constraints

• Utility conflicts

• Construction impacts

o Temporary traffic

o Noise

o Vibration

28

Traffic Impacts Carpool Lanes

• Two lanes will be removed between Story Road and Tully Road

• The Evergreen Specific Plan approved the carpool lanes as a temporary measure until light rail project was built

• Permanent traffic impacts with increased delay no less than 2.5 minutes from Quimby to Capitol Avenue

Existing Eight lanes on Capitol Expressway

Right of Way Constraint

9

30

Proposed Alignment Change

Revise profile to Aerial LRT

Sto

ry R

d

Cap

ito

l Ave

Tully

Rd

LRT Station

Oca

la A

ve

Cu

nn

ingh

am A

ve

31

Photo Simulation

Median to side runningtransition near Tully Road

Side running alignment at Capitol Expressway and Tully Road

32

Utility Conflicts

• Conflicts with electrical transmission towers with light rail

• Water line conflicts in median

• Gas, electrical and communications relocations at Story Road.

• Property acquisition required for most utility relocation

33

Transmission Tower Relocations

Before After

34

Construction

35

10’ 5’

traffic traffic

construction

walk access

construction

vehicle access

Southbound direction Northbound direction

varies varies

Construction

36

Cost

Total Measure A Project cost included in the DTEV line item has the following breakdown:

Project: DTEV Cost Status

Conceptual DTEV Overall $11M Closed

Original CELR $56M Closed

Phase 1A - pedestrian improvement $19M Closed

Phase 1B - bus and Eastridge Transit Center $60M Closed

Phase 2 - EBRC light rail* $453M Underway

Total project cost for DTEV $599M

* $386M Board approved with $12M spent to date

• Operations and Maintenance Cost: $2M - $3M per year

37

Budget and Ridership

Budget: CELR – Phase 2 (EBRC) Original Recommended

Estimated Total Cost of the Project $377M $453M

Measure A commitment $247M $247M

MTC Regional Measure 3 (RM3) (to be secured)* $130M $130M

Senate Bill (SB1) formula Funds $ 9M

Savings from other Measure A Projects $ 67M

* RM3 funding currently under challenge

Ridership

Estimate for increased daily boardings

• Year 2023: 1,235 Light Rail 940 Total Bus and Light Rail

• Year 2043: 2,212 Light Rail 1,316 Total Bus and Light Rail

• Note: Total bus and light rail is less than light rail only because some existing bus riders will shift to light rail at the Alum Rock, Story and Eastridge locations.

38

Environmental

Consider Certify EIRJune 2019

Property Acquisition

Utility Relocation

Engineering

Bid ReadyEnd 2019

Light Rail Construction

AdvertiseFebruary 2021

Begin ConstructionAugust 2021

Decision point

Begin utility relocationJuly 2019

Schedule

Begin property acquisitionJuly 2019

39

Recommended Next Steps

• Per Board direction:

o Update Environmental Document with project changes

o Once certified, begin property acquisition and utility relocation

o Continue with Engineering of construction documents

• Alternatives:

o Continue with environmental document and evaluation of system wide technology alternatives (rubber tire) and defer one or more of the following:

Engineering

Property acquisition

Utility relocation

Light Rail construction



Board Meeting: N/A

BOARD MEMORANDUM




FROM: Deputy GM/Chief Financial Officer, Raj Srinath

SUBJECT: Proposed Capital Budget for Fiscal Years 2020 and 2021

Policy-Related Action: Yes Government Code Section 84308 Applies: No

ACTION ITEM

RECOMMENDATION:

Recommend that the VTA Board of Directors approve the Proposed Fiscal Year 2020 and 2021

Capital Budget.

BACKGROUND:

Development of the FY 2020 and FY 2021 Capital Budget began with the call for projects in

August 2018. Potential projects were identified through a variety of factors including transit asset

management tools, regular asset inspections, completed strategic planning efforts, and specific

needs assessments. The capital budget development process is comprised of numerous levels of

review and evaluation with a goal to provide a thoroughly-considered proposal for Capital

Program Committee (CPC) and Board consideration. The Proposed Capital Budget for Fiscal

Years 2020 and 2021 was presented to the CPC at a workshop on February 28, 2019.

DISCUSSION:

There are a few minor changes to the project list presented at the February CPC workshop. These

changes, listed below, are reflected in the FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2 packet

(Attachment A).

VTA Transit Fund

• Project #67-FAST Program Implementation has been increased $2.844 million to

reflect additional grant funding (Low Carbon Transit Operations Program-LCTOP

Population-Based).

8

Page 2 of 4

• The mix of grant funding was adjusted for the following three projects to reflect

updated estimates from LCTOP Revenue-Based funds:

o Project #4-Electric Bus Procurement

o Project #9-Cerone Energy Storage System

o Project #11-Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion

• LCTOP funding had previously been categorized as “Federal” instead of “State”. The

project schedule on pages 2-5 and the impacted projects’ information have been

corrected.

The chart below shows the updated breakout of the FY 2020 and FY 2021 proposed projects by

funding source.

VTA Transit Fund

Proposed FY 2020 and FY 2021 Capital Budget by Funding Source

VTP Highway Program

• One project, SR 87/Charcot On-Ramp Part-time Travel Lane Pilot Project (previously

project #16), has been removed as it was determined to be a duplication of an existing

project. A portion of the projects in the VTP Highways Program have been

renumbered as a result of this change.

As mentioned at the February workshop, the 105 VTA Transit Fund projects submitted for

consideration were reviewed and rated based upon the project’s overall merit using an evaluation

criteria scale. The projects were then ranked based on their overall score. The Committee

requested information on the resulting ranking of the proposed projects. Attachment B shows the

VTA Transit Fund proposed projects listed by their respective ranking in the initial, financially

unconstrained review. Attachment C shows the same information sorted by the project numbers

used in pages 2-41 of Attachment A.

8

Page 3 of 4

The Committee also requested information on the weighting of the criteria used in the initial,

financially unconstrained review of VTA Transit Fund projects. The evaluation criteria (in

alphabetical order) and their respective weights are as follows:

• Enhances Safety & Security-0.06

• Environmental Sustainability-0.058

• Improves Cost Efficiency/Effectiveness-0.277

• Improves Transit System-0.109

• Increases Ridership-0.254

• Preserves/Maintains Transit System-0.242

The scoring systems allows projects that have a Safety, Security, or Environmental Sustainability

component to receive “bonus points.” Subsequent project reviews provide an additional

opportunity to ensure that Safety and Security are not compromised.

NEXT STEPS:

Following the Capital Program Committee’s March action, the Proposed Capital Budget will be

combined with the Proposed Operating Budget forming the Proposed FY 2020 and FY 2021

Biennial Budget for presentation at the Board of Directors’ April Workshop with final adoption

in June.

Key Upcoming Dates in Budget Development Process

April Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget presented at Board Workshop

May Community Review of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget

May Advisory Committee Review of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget

June Board of Directors Adoption of FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget

ALTERNATIVES:

The Capital Program Committee may choose to modify the Proposed Fiscal Year 2020 and 2021

Capital Budget.

FISCAL IMPACT:

There is no direct fiscal impact as a result of this action. However, ultimate approval of the FY

2020 and FY 2021 Biennial Budget by the VTA Board of Directors will provide the

appropriation, or legal authorization, to make expenditures and incur obligations.

Prepared by: Carol Lawson, Deputy Director of Finance, Budget & Program Management

Memo No. 6942

ATTACHMENTS:

• FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Budget Projects v2 Post Workshop Updates (PDF)

8

Page 4 of 4

• Proposed Projects by Ranking (PDF)

• Ranking by Project # (PDF)

8

FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2

CAPITAL PROGRAM COMMITTEE MEETING MARCH 28, 2019

Reflects updates since

February 28, 2019

Workshop

8.a

Page 1 of 63

SECTION 1

VTA Transit Fund

8.a

FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTA Transit Fund

Page 2 of 63

(Dollars in Thousands)

Project

Funding Source

Tota

l

Fed

eral

Stat

e

20

16

M

eas

ure

B

Oth

er

VTA

Lo

cal

1. Bus and LR Vehicle Mobile Router Replacement 1,200 0 0 0 300 1,500

2. Bus CCTV Replacement 2,640 0 0 0 660 3,300

3. Cameras for VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles 1,805 0 0 0 451 2,256

4. Electric Bus Procurement 10,483 14,517 0 0 0 25,000

5. Paratransit Fleet Program FY20 3,978 0 0 0 995 4,973

Revenue Vehicles & Equipment Total 20,106 14,517 0 0 2,406 37,029

6. Non-Revenue Vehicle Replacement Program 0 0 0 0 2,354 2,354

Non-Revenue Vehicles Total 0 0 0 0 2,354 2,354

7. Cerone Boiler Replacement 0 0 0 0 1,000 1,000

8. Cerone Emergency Generator Replacement 0 0 0 0 705 705

9. Cerone Energy Storage System 0 2,905 0 0 0 2,905

10. Chaboya Yard Well Removal 120 0 0 0 30 150

11. Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion 0 4,600 0 0 0 4,600

12. Expansion of Bus Yard Electric Capacity for Bus Chargers 0 750 0 0 0 750

13. Facilities Equipment Replacement Project 0 0 0 0 1,219 1,219

14. Fuel Dispenser Replacement 1,920 0 0 0 480 2,400

15. Guadalupe Entrance Security Improvement Project 1,000 0 0 0 250 1,250

16. Guadalupe Steam Rack Improvements 2,400 0 0 0 600 3,000

17. Guadalupe Train Wash Replacement 800 0 0 0 200 1,000

18. HVAC Replacement Program FY20 1,448 0 0 0 362 1,810

19. LED Exterior Lighting Replacement 0 0 0 0 750 750

20. Painting Management Program FY20 0 0 0 0 1,755 1,755

8.a


Page 3 of 63

Project

Funding Source

Tota

l

Fed

eral

Stat

e

20

16

M

eas

ure

B

Oth

er

VTA

Lo

cal

21. Pavement Management Program FY14 0 0 0 0 1,121 1,121

22. Pavement Management Program FY20 0 0 0 0 1,856 1,856

23. Replace Fire Alarm Systems at Guadalupe and Chaboya 1,200 0 0 0 300 1,500

24. Replace Roll-up Doors at Guadalupe Division 2,000 0 0 0 500 2,500

25. Replace Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) at Guad. 377 0 0 0 94 472

26. Roofing Management Program FY20 0 0 0 0 1,365 1,365

27. Way, Power, and Signals Storage Building 0 0 0 0 560 560

Operating Facilities & Equipment Total 11,266 8,255 0 0 13,146 32,667

28. Bridge and Structures Repairs FY20 800 0 0 0 200 1,000

29. Bridge Repair/Hamilton Structure Stabilization 280 0 0 0 70 350

30. Downtown San Jose Safety/Speed Improvements 4,920 0 0 0 1,230 6,150

31. Light Rail Crossovers and Switches FY20 0 0 0 0 6,600 6,600

32. OCS Rehabilitation and Replacement FY20 12,520 0 0 0 3,130 15,650

33. Rail Replacement and Rehabilitation FY20 11,440 0 0 0 2,860 14,300

34. Track Intrusion Abatement FY20 4,000 0 0 0 1,000 5,000

35. Union Pacific Culvert Replacement 0 0 0 0 440 440

36. Upgrade Ohlone/Chynoweth Interlocking 2,720 0 0 0 680 3,400

Light Rail Way, Power & Signal Total 36,680 0 0 0 16,210 52,890

37. ADA Upgrades at Facilities 2,560 0 0 0 640 3,200

38. Bus Stop Improvement Program 0 142 1,300 0 0 1,442

39. Light Rail Platform CCTV Replacement 446 0 0 0 111 557

40. Light Rail Platform Public Address System Upgrade 2,216 0 0 0 554 2,770

41. Light Rail Station Rehabilitation FY 20 776 0 0 0 194 970

42. North San Jose Transportation Improvements 0 0 0 3,000 0 3,000

8.a


Page 4 of 63

Project

Funding Source

Tota

l

Fed

eral

Stat

e

20

16

M

eas

ure

B

Oth

er

VTA

Lo

cal

43. Pedestrian Backgates at Light Rail Crossings 6,560 0 0 0 1,640 8,200

44. Rehabilitation of LR System Elevators and Escalators 7,440 0 0 0 1,860 9,300

45. San Jose Diridon Station Plan 0 0 2,500 7,500 0 10,000

46. Transit Center Park and Ride Rehabilitation FY20 1,600 0 0 0 400 2,000

Passenger Facilities Total 21,598 142 3,800 10,500 5,399 41,439

47. Advanced Cyber Security 0 0 0 0 400 400

48. Bus Yard Vehicle Management Solution 0 0 0 0 2,266 2,266

49. Chatbot Interactive Virtual Agent 0 0 0 0 207 207

50. Disaster Recovery Cloud 0 0 0 0 500 500

51. Enterprise Database for Key Performance Indicators 0 0 0 0 500 500

52. GIS Program Development 0 0 0 0 802 802

53. Network and Gigabit Fiber Upgrade 1,200 0 0 0 300 1,500

54. Records Management Program 0 0 0 0 2,900 2,900

55. River Oaks Campus Network Cabling 0 0 0 0 1,400 1,400

56. SAP HANA Data Platform Implementation 0 0 0 0 1,500 1,500

57. SCADA Hardware, Software and Network Upgrade 4,447 0 0 0 1,112 5,559

58. Server Refresh 0 0 0 0 800 800

59. Upgrade Countywide Travel Demand Model 0 0 0 680 280 960

60. Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Estimation Tool 130 0 0 250 0 380

61. VTA Gigabit Network Project 960 0 0 0 240 1,200

Information Systems & Technology Total 6,737 0 0 930 13,207 20,874

62. Caltrain Capital - Annual Local Match 0 9,414 0 0 586 10,000

63. Capital Contingency 0 0 0 2,000 2,000 4,000

64. Community-Based Transportation Plans 300 0 0 0 0 300

8.a


Page 5 of 63

Project

Funding Source

Tota

l

Fed

eral

Stat

e

20

16

M

eas

ure

B

Oth

er

VTA

Lo

cal

65. Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans 250 250 0 500 0 1,000

66. Facility and Fleet Plan 0 0 0 0 715 715

67. FAST Program Implementation 0 2,844 0 0 3,400 6,244

68. Santa Clara Great America Intermodal Stn Master Plan 0 0 0 750 0 750

69. South County Rail Study 0 0 750 0 0 750

70. SR 85 Transit Guideway Preliminary Engineering 0 0 2,365 0 0 2,365

71. VA Pilot Smart Shuttle 2,700 0 0 0 675 3,375

Miscellaneous Total 3,250 12,509 3,115 3,250 7,376 29,499

Grand Total 99,637 35,423 6,915 14,680 60,098 216,752

Note: Totals may not be precise due to independent rounding.

8.a


Page 6 of 63

Revenue Vehicles & Equipment

1. Bus and Light Rail Vehicle Mobile Router Replacement-$1.5 million

Project Scope

This project will replace approximately 700 Mobile Routers used to provide passenger Wi-Fi, live look-in CCTV, CAD/AVL and other technology system communication needs on Light Rail Vehicles and buses that are currently operating with end-of-life routers.

Funding (in millions)

Business Line(s) Supported

• Faster Frequent Reliable Transit

Operating Budget Impact

Software license, support and warranty are expected to cost $270,000/year for all 700 units.

Estimated Total Project Cost-$1.5 million

Anticipated Completion Date-June 2020

2. Bus CCTV Replacement-$3.3 million

Project Scope

This project will replace approximately 333 CCTV systems on buses operating with end-of life Network Video recorders to ensure that the CCTV systems on these buses continue to operate reliably until

the buses are decommissioned to age and/or use.



• Delivering Projects and Programs


Cost savings will be realized due to new product warranty, however additional expenditures are expected as well due to increased functionality. Overall a net zero increase/decrease is anticipated.



Federal-5337$1.200

VTA Local$0.300

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5307

$2.640

VTA Local$0.660

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 7 of 63

3. Cameras for VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles-$2.256 million

Project Scope

This project will install and deploy real-time security cameras on 200 VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles.






The estimated annual operating impact is $313,840, which includes software maintenance and support; cellular service; and maintenance/support and software licenses.



4. Electric Bus Procurement-$25.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide funding required to purchase an additional 25 electric buses.




• Transportation System Management


Annual savings estimated at $5,000 per bus due to reduced maintenance costs for electric buses versus diesel powered buses.


Anticipated Completion Date-September 2022

Federal-5307$1.805

VTA Local$0.451

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5307$10.483

State-LCTOP$14.517

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 8 of 63

5. Paratransit Fleet Program FY20-$4.973 million

Project Scope

This project will procure 80 vehicles and associated equipment for provision of paratransit service to replace vehicles that have exceeded their useful life.






Estimated savings of $57,000 per year due to reduced maintenance costs for new vehicles.



Non-Revenue Vehicles

6. Non-Revenue Vehicle Replacement Program-$2.354 million

Project Scope

This project provides for the replacement of 46 non-revenue vehicles that have exceeded their useful life (average mileage of 146,000, average age—14 years). Retired vehicles are replaced with hybrid or electric vehicles whenever possible per VTA’s Sustainable Fleet Policy.





Estimated savings of $125,000 per year due to less critical maintenance repairs of the aging fleet.



Federal-5307$3.978

VTA Local$0.995

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$2.354

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 9 of 63

Operating Facilities & Equipment

7. Cerone Boiler Replacement-$1.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding needed to remove and replace two existing 1978 York Shipley firetube boilers that have reached the end of their useful life.





Some savings anticipated due to reduced repair costs and fuel consumption.



8. Cerone Emergency Generator Replacement-$0.705 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding needed to remove and replace two existing 500kw liquid propane gas generators with one 1200kw diesel generator.





Some savings anticipated due to reduced use of propane.


Anticipated Completion Date-March 2020

VTA Local$1.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$0.705

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 10 of 63

9. Cerone Energy Storage System-$2.905 million

Project Scope

This project will deploy a commercial, advanced, high-capacity energy storage system to allow charging of electric buses using the stored energy when the electricity rate is at peak price or when there are electrical outages.





Estimated annual savings of $15,000.



10. Chaboya Yard Well Removal-$0.15 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding needed to obtain case closure and demolish the ground water remediation system and wells at the Chaboya Bus Yard.





None



State-LCTOP$2.905

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5307$0.120

VTA Local$0.030

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 11 of 63

11. Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion-$4.6 million

Project Scope

This project will fund electric bus chargers and infrastructure to expand the size, capacity, and efficiency of the current charging station to support the deployment of up to 30 electric buses.






Fueling of buses with electricity instead of diesel is anticipated to result in annual cost savings. In addition, savings on maintenance costs for electric buses versus diesel powered buses are estimated at $5,000 per year, per bus.



12. Expansion of Bus Yard Electric Capacity for Bus Chargers-$0.75 million

Project Scope

This project will fund an expansion of electrical capacity at the Cerone Bus Yard to support the deployment of additional electric buses.






Fueling of buses with electricity instead of diesel is anticipated to result in annual cost savings. In addition, savings on maintenance costs for electric buses versus diesel powered buses are estimated at $5,000 per year, per bus.


Anticipated Completion Date-November 2021

State-LCTOP$4.600

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

State-LCTOP$0.750

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 12 of 63

13. Facilities Equipment Replacement Project-$1.219 million

Project Scope

This project allows for the scheduled replacement of equipment that has reached the end of its useful life. Scheduled replacements in the two-year period include forklifts, bus lifts, compressors, parts carousels, stationary pressure washers, and brake lathes.





Estimated savings of $10,000 per year due to reduced maintenance costs for newer equipment.



14. Fuel Dispenser Replacement-$2.4 million

Project Scope

This project will replace 16 diesel and 1 gasoline dispensers that are outdated and near the end of their useful life. The project will also replace all Under-Dispenser Containment (UDCs) for these dispensers.






None



VTA Local$1.219

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5307$1.920

VTA Local$0.480

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 13 of 63

15. Guadalupe Entrance Security Improvement Project-$1.25 million

Project Scope

This project will enhance security at the Guadalupe Light Rail Division by relocating the security guard house and installing equipment to bolster security measures.







Anticipated annual maintenance expense of $1,000 for CCTV cameras, electronic card readers and crossing gates.



16. Guadalupe Steam Rack Improvements-$3.0 million

Project Scope

This project will replace and upgrade the existing steam rack track with a new liner system and overhead roof structure. The steam rack is used to clean the undercarriage of light rail vehicles to remove heavy debris and grease buildup to assist with visual inspections. This improvement will ensure the proper collection of contaminated water and reduce unnecessary collection and treatment of rainwater.






Estimated annual net savings of $7,000 due to reduction in water treatment chemicals required for improved steam rack system.


Anticipated Completion Date-December 2021

Federal-5307$1.000

VTA Local$0.250

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5337$2.400

VTA Local$0.600

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 14 of 63

17. Guadalupe Train Wash Replacement-$1.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding needed to remove and replace the light rail vehicle wash system that has reached the end of its useful life.





Some savings anticipated from reduced overtime for maintenance workers.


Anticipated Completion Date-July 2021

18. Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) Replacement Program FY20-$1.81 million

Project Scope

This project will replace HVAC units that have reached the end of their working life spans at various VTA facilities. The new equipment will be integrated into the overall Energy Management System that will allow automated control functions to maximize efficiency of operation and track costs.





Annual savings of $5,000 to $20,000 depending on size of unit due to improved energy efficiency.



Federal-5337

$0.800

VTA Local$0.200

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Federal-5307

$1.448

VTA Local$0.362

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 15 of 63

19. LED Exterior Lighting Replacement-$0.75 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding required to retrofit existing facilities with energy efficient LED light fixtures to improve lighting levels and reduce energy consumption.






Based on previous LED upgrades, energy savings of 22% of project cost and maintenance savings of 10% of project costs are anticipated. These savings result in an approximate 3-year payback on investment.



20. Painting Management Program FY20-$1.755 million

Project Scope

This project provides painting maintenance and repair to the exterior and interiors of all VTA operational, administrative and passenger facilities.





None



VTA Local$0.750

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$1.755

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 16 of 63

21. Pavement Management Program FY14-$1.121 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding needed for pavement rehabilitation and repair for the North Division Operating Facility.





Potential maintenance savings associated with keeping pavement in a state of good repair.


Anticipated Completion Date-January 2021

22. Pavement Management Program FY20-$1.856 million

Project Scope

This project addresses immediate pavement failure issues and maintains the existing assets in a condition that preserves them from future failure. Planned activities in the two-year period include general maintenance, rehabilitation of two lots at the River Oaks Administration Facility, and slurry seal and restriping at various Cerone Division locations.





Potential maintenance savings associated with keeping pavement in a state of good repair.



VTA Local$1.121

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% VTA Local$1.856

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 17 of 63

23. Replace Fire Alarm Systems at Guadalupe and Chaboya-$1.5 million

Project Scope

This project will replace the fire alarm systems at the Guadalupe and Chaboya Operating Facilities which are progressively degrading leading to extremely high maintenance costs.






Annual net savings of $38,000 due to elimination of repairs and maintenance of old system.



24. Replace Roll-up Doors at Guadalupe Division-$2.5 million

Project Scope

This project will replace roll-up doors at Guadalupe Division with newer updated models that have modern safety precautions. The existing doors have reached the end of their useful life and replacement parts for repair are no longer available.






Annual net savings of $15,000 due to less maintenance and repair costs for newer updated models.



Federal-5307$1.200

VTA Local$0.300

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5337$2.000

VTA Local$0.500

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 18 of 63

25. Replace Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) at Guadalupe-$0.472 million

Project Scope

This project will replace various uninterruptable power supplies (UPS) and power distribution units at the Guadalupe Light Rail Operating Facility which have reached the end of their useful life.






None


Anticipated Completion Date-May 2020

26. Roofing Management Program FY20-$1.365 million

Project Scope

This project funds the ongoing, comprehensive program to maximize the useful life and integrity of VTA facilities. Planned activities in the two-year period include general maintenance, and re-roofing of various areas at the North Division Operating Facility.





Estimated annual savings of $30,000 from reduced energy costs in air-conditioned spaces and reduced man-hours lost due to disruptions from roof leaks or other water intrusions.



Federal-5307$0.377

VTA Local$0.094

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$1.365

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 19 of 63

27. Way, Power, and Signals Storage Building-$0.56 million

Project Scope

This project will expand the existing building for storage of Way, Power and Signals material and equipment at the Guadalupe Light Rail Facility to provide for secure storage, protection from the elements, and elimination of potential storm water contamination.






None



Light Rail Way, Power & Signal

28. Bridge and Structures Repairs FY20-$1.0 million

Project Scope

This project will provide corrective work as necessary for compliance with California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) regulations.





None



VTA Local$0.560

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5337

$0.800

VTA Local$0.200

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 20 of 63

29. Bridge Repair/Hamilton Structure Stabilization-$0.35 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide the remaining funding required to complete stabilization of the Hamilton Bridge Structure.





None


Anticipated Completion Date-April 2020

30. Downtown San Jose Safety/Speed Improvements-$6.15 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will extend safety enhancements to the full Downtown San Jose Transit Mall (1st and 2nd street from St. James to San Carlos) to deter pedestrian, bicycle, scooter, and vehicle intrusion into the light rail trackway.





Annual maintenance costs estimated at $30,000.



Federal-5337$0.280

VTA Local$0.070

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5337$4.920

VTA Local$1.230

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 21 of 63

31. Light Rail Crossovers and Switches FY20-$6.6 million

Project Scope

This project will procure and install special trackwork, double crossovers, manual switches, and overhead catenary systems at two locations (Capitol/Mabury and North First/Bonaventura) along the existing light rail corridor to improve operational flexibility and reliability.





Potential cost savings due to improved operational flexibility.



32. OCS Rehabilitation and Replacement FY20-$15.65 million

Project Scope

This project funds the rehabilitation and replacement of portions of the light rail Overhead Catenary System (OCS) as identified in various assessment studies. The rehabilitation activities include replacement of contact wires, wire support systems, under bridge supports, and feeder cables.





Potential maintenance and emergency repair cost savings associated with keeping the assets in a state of good repair.



VTA Local$6.600

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5337$12.520

VTA Local$3.130

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 22 of 63

33. Rail Replacement and Rehabilitation FY20-$14.3 million

Project Scope

This project is part of a capital replacement and maintenance program to ensure that the Light Rail track infrastructure remains safe, reliable and in an enhanced state of good repair. The scope of this request includes rehabilitation and replacement of track components as identified by inspections and assessments.





Potential maintenance and emergency repair cost savings associated with keeping the assets in a state of good repair.



34. Track Intrusion Abatement FY20-$5.0 million

Project Scope

This project will take steps to prevent track intrusion at priority segments as evaluated by VTA’s Safety Committee. Planned improvements include signage, pavement striping, fencing and barriers.





None



Federal-5337$11.440

VTA Local$2.860

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5337$4.000

VTA Local$1.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 23 of 63

35. Union Pacific Culvert Replacement-$0.44 million

Project Scope

This project consists of assessment and design for the replacement of Union Pacific Structure 4 – Hacienda Culvert due to visible deterioration. Additional funds for construction will be requested in the next budget cycle.





None


Anticipated Completion Date-October 2022

36. Upgrade Ohlone/Chynoweth Interlocking-$3.4 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will complete the redesign of existing relay-based interlocking at Ohlone/Chynoweth to implement a fully functioning interlocking using existing infrastructure where possible.





Reduced maintenance costs and equipment failures due to increased system reliability.



VTA Local$0.440

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5337$2.720

VTA Local$0.680

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 24 of 63

Passenger Facilities

37. ADA Upgrades at Facilities-$3.2 million

Project Scope

This project will modify, construct and mitigate ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act) non-compliant items at various VTA facilities.





None



38. Bus Stop Improvement Program-$1.442 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation funds the continued implementation of bus stop improvements systemwide for improved passenger safety, comfort and access. Planned improvements include new and replacement shelters, lighting, access improvements including safe sidewalk connections, passenger information signs and security.





Annual maintenance of new shelters estimated at $50,000.



Federal-5307

$2.560

VTA Local$0.640

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2016 Measure B$1.300

State-Lifeline$0.142

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 25 of 63

39. Light Rail Platform CCTV Replacement-$0.557 million

Project Scope

This project will replace CCTV equipment at four to six Light Rail Station platforms.





Estimated annual savings of $18,000 initially due to reduced number of maintenance calls for newer equipment.



40. Light Rail Platform Public Address System Upgrade-$2.77 million

Project Scope

This project will replace existing equipment on older Public Address (PA) systems such as power lines, amplifiers, preamp/mixers; upgrade PA maintenance telephones; and augment, test and commission the PA system on all stations.





Estimated net annual saving of $139,000 due to reduced maintenance costs for new equipment.



Federal-5337$0.446

VTA Local$0.111

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5337

$2.216

VTA Local$0.554

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 26 of 63

41. Light Rail Station Rehabilitation FY 20-$0.97 million

Project Scope

This project will provide rehabilitation and repair for various light rail stations including repainting, crack sealing, light pole replacement, tactile warning band replacement, concrete repair, etc.





None


Anticipated Completion Date-February 2022

42. North San Jose Transportation Improvements-$3.0 million

Project Scope

This project will plan, design and construct eligible transit projects in North San Jose using developer fees collected by the City of San Jose.





Annual maintenance of various improvements estimated at $5,000.



Federal-5337$0.776

VTA Local$0.194

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Other-San Jose$3.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 27 of 63

43. Pedestrian Backgates at Light Rail Crossings-$8.2 million

Project Scope

This project will install pedestrian gates at several crossings along the Guadalupe and Tasman West light rail corridors to enhance safety at pedestrian crossings.





None



44. Rehabilitation of Light Rail System Elevators and Escalators-$9.3 million

Project Scope

This project will repair and rehabilitate elevators and escalators at various locations along the light rail system.






Anticipated savings from reduction in ongoing maintenance costs.



Federal-5337$6.560

VTA Local$1.640

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5337$7.440

VTA Local$1.860

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 28 of 63

45. San Jose Diridon Station Plan-$10.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will complete funding required for the planning, environmental clearance and preliminary engineering of the San Jose Diridon Station Multimodal Transportation Center.





Development of a new station will have operating and maintenance cost impacts on the entities involved in the project. Determination of how the station will be managed, funded and governed is part of the project scope.



46. Transit Center Park and Ride Rehabilitation FY20-$2.0 million

Project Scope

This project will provide for refurbishment and repair of maintenance issues at transit centers and park and ride lots throughout the VTA service area.





Potential maintenance savings associated with keeping assets in a state of good repair.



2016 Measure B

$2.500Other-Partners

$7.500

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-5307$1.600

VTA Local$0.400

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 29 of 63

Information Systems & Technology

47. Advanced Cyber Security-$0.4 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation provides funding to complete development of a cyber security program including software, hardware, network monitoring tools, anti-malware tools, consulting/audit/testing services, training, and development/update of policies and procedures to mitigate risk.





Ongoing maintenance and support for security technologies, amount to be determined.



48. Bus Yard Vehicle Management Solution-$2.266 million

Project Scope

This project will design and implement an advanced yard management solution to locate vehicles anywhere in the yard real time. The solution provides 24x7 tracking, even when vehicles and onboard systems are powered down, reports on vehicle inventory, pullout performance, and vehicle movement in the yard.







Operation efficiency savings are anticipated due to elimination of manual tracking of vehicles.



VTA Local$0.400

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$2.266

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 30 of 63

49. Chatbot Interactive Virtual Agent-$0.207 million

Project Scope

This project would design and build an interactive virtual agent, commonly known as a “Chatbot”. This software can efficiently help VTA customers and potentially other audiences with basic needs 24/7/365 and in multiple languages.







Annual maintenance costs estimated at $26,000 offset by savings from operational efficiencies.



50. Disaster Recovery Cloud-$0.5 million

Project Scope

This project will secure a Cloud Disaster Recovery site to replicate VTA’s production servers enabling VTA computer systems to function during a major emergency or disaster.





Annual maintenance costs estimated at $100,000.



VTA Local$0.207

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$0.500

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 31 of 63

51. Enterprise Database for Key Performance Indicators-$0.5 million

Project Scope

This project will create an enterprise transit database as a central repository of key performance data used agency-wide for analysis, planning, tracking, measuring, reporting, and decision-making purposes.







Annual maintenance costs estimated at $8,000 offset by savings from operational efficiencies.



52. Geographic Information System (GIS) Program Development-$0.802 million

Project Scope

This project supports the continued development of the VTA GIS Program and its products. These products provide geospatial information and solutions to all VTA divisions and departments, external data feeds, big data management and analysis, open data proliferation, and Congestion Management Member Agencies.





Annual maintenance costs including software subscriptions estimated at $50,000.



VTA Local$0.500

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$0.802

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 32 of 63

53. Network and Gigabit Fiber Upgrade-$1.5 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation provides the remaining funding needed to upgrade VTA’s backbone network to enhance network capacity. It will provide for additional fiber optic installations as well as minor equipment to help augment VTA’s existing wide area network.





Annual increase to maintenance support contract of $80,000.



54. Records Management Program-$2.9 million

Project Scope

This project provides software, hardware, and consulting services needed to deploy an in-depth electronic record management program, including resources to help in the transition of business processes and documents to an Electronic Document Management System (EDMS). This augmentation will build on tools previously implemented to automate other critical, paper centric business processes.





None



Federal-5307$1.200

VTA Local$0.300

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$2.900

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 33 of 63

55. River Oaks Campus Network Cabling-$1.4 million

Project Scope

This project will install a new physical copper wire network (voice, data, video) for portions of the River Oaks Administration campus. The current cabling system is experiencing a 30% failure rate. This effort will allow for deployment of network intensive software or applications and improve network stability and reliability.





Annual savings estimated at $20,000 per year due to decreased need to maintain and troubleshoot old, failing network.



56. SAP HANA Data Platform Implementation-$1.5 million

Project Scope

This project will implement SAP HANA, a business data platform that processes transactions and analytics with built-in advanced analytics and multi-model data processing engines. Deployment of the SAP HANA data platform allows for simplification of technology landscapes, eliminating data preparation and allowing instant access to structured and unstructured data from different sources.





Annual maintenance fees estimated at $145,600.



VTA Local$1.400

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$1.500

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 34 of 63

57. SCADA Hardware, Software and Network Upgrade-$5.559 million

Project Scope

This project will augment, test, and commission all three components of the Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition (SCADA) system: hardware, network equipment, and software. The SCADA system provides safety critical controls for operation of the light rail system. The existing associated hardware and software are at the end of their useful lives. This update is essential for the system to remain operational in the event of a hardware or network equipment failure.





Application software support estimated at $200,000 per year.



58. Server Refresh-$0.8 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation provides the remaining funding needed to replace aging server equipment that has reached the end of its useful life in order to provide maximum uptime and minimize unplanned system outages.





None



Federal-5337$4.447

VTA Local$1.112

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$0.800

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 35 of 63

59. Upgrade Countywide Travel Demand Model-$0.96 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation provides remaining funding needed to complete the development of the new travel demand model to meet the Model Consistency Requirements set for by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC), while improving model accuracy and expanding model functionalities.





None



60. Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Estimation Tool-$0.38 million

Project Scope

This project involves the creation of a “VMT Estimation Tool” (an online, Geographic Information Systems-based tool) to allow VTA and the Congestion Management Member Agencies to estimate Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) for land use projects and plans. This tool is necessary due to the enactment of Senate Bill (SB) 743, which calls for agencies to move away from the use of Level of Service (LOS) and towards the use of VMT in transportation analysis.





None



CMP$0.470

Other-Cities$0.210

VTA Local$0.280

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-STP$0.130

CMP$0.115

Other-Cities$0.135

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 36 of 63

61. VTA Gigabit Network Project-$1.2 million

Project Scope

This project will provide optic fiber installation, network equipment and materials necessary to support the increased needs for new passenger, fare payments, CCTV (closed circuit television), audio, passenger information and other systems being installed throughout VTA's WAN (wide area network) and MAN (metropolitan area network). This budget augmentation will fund the project through completion.





Annual hardware warranty and system support estimated at $120,000.



Miscellaneous

62. Caltrain Capital – Annual Local Match-$10.0 million

Project Scope This project provides funding for VTA’s portion of Caltrain’s Capital program. The contributions from the funding partners (VTA, the City and County of San Francisco, and the San Mateo County Transit District) are primarily used to match state and federal grant funds that are provided to Caltrain.





Operating Budget Impact There is no direct operating costs impact to VTA. Operating and maintenance costs for Caltrain service are incorporated in the Caltrain operating subsidy.



Federal-5307$0.960

VTA Local$0.240

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

State-STA/SGR$9.414

VTA Local$0.586

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 37 of 63

63. Capital Contingency-$4.0 million

Project Scope This appropriation is a placeholder for projects that are not currently anticipated but may arise during the two-year budget cycle. These funds are administered by the Capital Improvement Program Oversight Committee, which is composed of VTA’s Division Chiefs and Directors. Unused Capital Contingency appropriation expires at the end of the two-year budget cycle.



• N/A

Operating Budget Impact Potential impact on operating cost is dependent on nature of identified activities.



64. Community-Based Transportation Plans-$0.3 million

Project Scope

This project will complete Community-Based Transportation Plans for Santa Clara County as required by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission (MTC) for all Congestion Management Agencies (CMAs). These studies will improve access and mobility for low-income communities and engage residents and community organizations in conducting the analysis and shaping the recommendations.





None



Other-TBD$2.000

VTA Local$2.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%Federal-STP

$0.300

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 38 of 63

65. Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans-$1.0 million

Project Scope

This project will study key congested corridors in Santa Clara Valley to produce a comprehensive multimodal corridor plan. The program is designed to reduce congestion by identifying improvements while preserving the character of the local community. The state requires that local agencies develop corridor plans to be eligible for funding through the Solutions for Congested Corridor Program.





None



66. Facility and Fleet Plan-$0.715 million

Project Scope

This project would develop a facility and fleet plan outlining the roadmap for future fleet purchases and facility needs in light of state policies that require VTA to modernize its fleet to be in line with California Air Resources Board (CARB) requirements by 2030.





None



Federal-TBD$0.250

State-TBD$0.250

CMP$0.500

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

VTA Local$0.715

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 39 of 63

67. FAST Program Implementation-$6.244 million

Project Scope

This project will implement transit signal priority, bus stop balancing and other speed-related improvements in frequent transit corridors to improve travel times and reduce operating costs.





Estimates indicate that an increase in average speed of one mile-per-hour would reduce annual operating costs by over $15M per year.



68. Santa Clara Great America Intermodal Station Master Plan-$0.75 million

Project Scope

This project will study potential designs to upgrade the existing Santa Clara Great America Intermodal Station to a multi-level, urban-style station that would serve the new growth and transportation demand proposed by City Place, Levi’s Stadium and future development in the city of Santa Clara.







None



VTA Local$3.400

State-LCTOP$2.844

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Other-Santa Clara$0.750

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 40 of 63

69. South County Rail Study-$0.75 million

Project Scope

This project will study potential options for enhanced South Santa Clara County heavy rail service in relation to the potential service expansion as part of the 2016 Measure B program.





None



70. State Route 85 Transit Guideway Preliminary Engineering-$2.365 million

Project Scope

This project will fund preliminary engineering for the investment decision identified by the SR 85 Transit Guideway Study. This will include refined corridor definition, potential station locations, updated capital and operating cost estimates, and ridership projections.






Updated operating cost estimates would be determined as part of the project scope.




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 Measure B$2.365

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 41 of 63

71. VA Pilot Smart Shuttle-$3.375 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation provides the remaining funding needed for this five-year pilot project. The goal of the project is to develop a “Comprehensive Autonomous Shuttle System” featuring on-demand or pre-scheduled service for all types of passengers in and around the Palo Alto Hospital area using a connected autonomous shuttle and pre-identified Smart Stop locations.





None



Federal-IDEA$2.700

VTA Local$0.675

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a

Page 42 of 63

SECTION 2

2000 Measure A Program

8.a

FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-2000 Measure A Program

Page 43 of 63


Project

Funding Source

Tota

l

20

16

M

eas

ure

B

20

00

M

eas

ure

A

1. SVRT Project Development After FY09 150,000 563,500 713,500

SVRT Program Total 150,000 563,500 713,500

2. Eastridge to BART Regional Connector 0 129,700 129,700

Light Rail Program Total 0 129,700 129,700

3. Capitalized Interest and Other Bond Costs 0 60,485 60,485

Measure A Programwide Total 0 60,485 60,485

Grand Total 150,000 753,685 903,685

8.a


Page 44 of 63

SVRT Program

1. SVRT Project Development After FY09-$713.5 million

Project Scope

This project provides BART Silicon Valley program management as well as work specific to Phase II of the BART Silicon Valley. Phase II work to be undertaken in the two-year period includes engineering, right-of-way and advance utility relocation efforts, long lead construction, and procurement items.






Ongoing operating and maintenance costs are currently under negotiation with BART. These expenditures will be funded by BART fare revenues and the 2008 Measure B one-eighth sales tax.

Estimated Total Project Cost-$4.78 billion


Light Rail Program

2. Eastridge to BART Regional Connector-$129.7 million

Project Scope

This project will construct a light rail extension from Alum Rock to the Eastridge Transit Center with a continuous elevated guideway. The extension will include LRT stations at Story Road (aerial) and Eastridge (at-grade).






Operating and maintenance costs are estimated at $2-$3 million annually depending on service frequency.



2000 Measure A$563.500

2016 Measure B$150.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2000 Measure A$129.700

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 45 of 63

Measure A Programwide

3. Capitalized Interest and Other Bond Costs-$60.485 million

Project Scope

This project represents the capitalized portion of interest and debt related ancillary charges that arise from the issuance of sales tax revenue bonds, the proceeds of which fund a portion of various 2000 Measure A capital projects.





None

Estimated Total Project Cost-N/A


2000 Measure A$60.485

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a

Page 46 of 63

SECTION 3

VTP Highway Program

8.a

FY20 & FY21 Proposed Capital Projects v2-VTP Highway Program

Page 47 of 63


Project

Funding Source

Tota

l

Fed

eral

Stat

e

20

16

M

eas

ure

B

Oth

er

1. Calaveras Boulevard Near-term Improvements 0 0 1,800 200 2,000

2. Freeway Performance Initiative Phase 2 2,000 0 0 0 2,000

3. I-280 Foothill Expressway Ramp Improvements 0 0 800 0 800

4. I-280 HOV: Magdalena Ave to San Mateo County Line 0 0 1,800 200 2,000

5. I-280 Soundwalls 0 2,000 0 0 2,000

6. I-280/Saratoga Ave Interchange Improvements 0 0 1,800 200 2,000

7. I-280/Winchester Boulevard Interchange Improvements 0 0 8,000 0 8,000

8. I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Improvements 0 0 2,600 0 2,600

9. I-680 Sound Walls 0 1,000 0 0 1,000

10. I-680/Alum Rock/McKee Interchange Improvements 0 0 1,800 200 2,000

11. Noise Reduction Program on SR 85 0 100 7,525 0 7,625

12. SR 17/SR 9 Interchange Improvements 0 0 3,600 400 4,000

13. SR 237 Westbound On-Ramp at Middlefield Road 0 0 34,000 5,500 39,500

14. SR 237/Great America Pkwy WB Off-Ramp Improvements 0 0 1,500 0 1,500

15. SR 237/US 101/Mathilda Ave Landscaping Project 0 0 3,000 0 3,000

16. US 101 De La Cruz/Trimble Interchange Improvements 0 0 50,600 0 50,600

17. US 101 San Antonio/Charleston/Rengstorff Ramp Impvmt 0 0 1,800 200 2,000

18. US 101/I-880 Interchange Improvement Feasibility Study 0 0 0 1,500 1,500

19. US 101/SR 25 Interchange Improvements 0 0 55,000 0 55,000

Highways Total 2,000 3,100 175,625 8,400 189,125

20. Lawrence Expressway Grade Separation 0 0 22,500 2,500 25,000

Expressways Total 0 0 22,500 2,500 25,000

8.a


Page 48 of 63

Project

Funding Source

Tota

l

Fed

eral

Stat

e

20

16

M

eas

ure

B

Oth

er

21. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - Electronic Toll System (ETS) 0 0 0 22,000 22,000

22. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - US 101 Phase 5 0 5,000 0 0 5,000

23. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - US 101/SR 85 Phase 4 0 2,300 0 7,700 10,000

Express Lanes Total 0 7,300 0 29,700 37,000

24. Bicycle Superhighway Feasibility and Alternatives Analysis 0 0 480 1,520 2,000

25. Countywide Bike and Ped Education/Encouragement Program 0 0 500 0 500

26. King Road Ped Safety and Transit Access Improvements 0 2,816 0 0 2,816

Bicycle & Pedestrian Total 0 2,816 980 1,520 5,316

27. Bascom Complete Streets Project 5,137 0 5,137 0 10,274

28. Story-Keyes Complete Streets Project 0 0 7,668 0 7,668

29. Tasman Corridor Complete Streets Project 828 0 7,452 0 8,280

Complete Streets Total 5,965 0 20,257 0 26,222

Grand Total 7,965 13,216 219,362 42,120 282,663

Note: Totals may not be precise due to independent rounding.

8.a


Page 49 of 63

Highways

1. Calaveras Boulevard Near-term Improvements-$2.0 million

Project Scope

This project will construct High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) bypass lanes at the westbound SR 237 on-ramp from McCarthy Boulevard and at the westbound SR 237 on-ramp from Calaveras Boulevard in Milpitas.





None



2. Freeway Performance Initiative Phase 2-$2.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation funds future phases of work on MTC’s Freeway Performance Initiative program designed to maximize efficiency of the existing highways using technology. The project’s purpose is to prepare plans and construct improvements to implement technologies that provide for better surveillance of traffic conditions.





None




Other-Milpitas$0.200

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Federal-FPI$2.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 50 of 63

3. I-280 Foothill Expressway Ramp Improvements-$0.8 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation completes funding needed to add one new off-ramp lane, retaining walls, new lighting, and related improvements at the northbound I-280 off-ramp to Foothill Expressway in Los Altos.





None



4. I-280 HOV: Magdalena Ave to San Mateo County Line-$2.0 million

Project Scope

This project will construct a new High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV)/Express Lane on I-280 between Magdalena Avenue and the San Mateo County Line. The requested budget is for the Project Initiation Document only.





None




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


Other-TBD$0.200

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 51 of 63

5. I-280 Soundwalls-$2.0 million

Project Scope

This project will construct soundwalls along I-280 between Los Gatos Creek and Bird Avenue in San Jose. The requested budget is for the Project Approval/Environmental Document and Plans, Specifications, and Estimates phases of the project.





None



6. I-280/Saratoga Ave Interchange Improvements-$2.0 million

Project Scope

This project will modify the I-280/Saratoga Avenue interchange to improve operations for local and freeway traffic including adding bicycle and pedestrian facilities on Saratoga Avenue in San Jose. The requested budget will fund the Project Initiation Document including related preliminary engineering efforts.





None



State-STIP$2.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%



0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 52 of 63

7. I-280/Winchester Boulevard Interchange Improvements-$8.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide funds for the completion of Project Approval/Environmental Documents and the final design, plans, specifications and estimate in order to construct improvements near the I-280/Winchester Boulevard Interchange in San Jose.





None

Estimated Total Project Cost-$90 million


8. I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange Improvements-$2.6 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide funds for the completion of Project Approval/Environmental Documents and final design for the I-280/Wolfe Road Interchange improvements in Cupertino.





None




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 53 of 63

9. I-680 Sound Walls-$1.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will complete the funding needed to construct sound walls along I-680 between Capitol Expressway and Mueller Avenue in San Jose.





None


Anticipated Completion Date-August 2021

10. I-680/Alum Rock/McKee Interchange Improvements-$2.0 million

Project Scope

This project will modify the I-680/Alum Rock Avenue/McKee Road interchange to improve operations for local and freeway traffic. It will also add bicycle and pedestrian facilities on the Alum Rock Avenue and McKee Road overcrossings. The requested budget will fund the Project Initiation Document including related preliminary engineering efforts.





None



State-STIP$1.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%



0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 54 of 63

11. Noise Reduction Program on SR 85-$7.625 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will address noise reduction along the SR 85 corridor including the preliminary engineering and project environmental documents process, and noise reduction pilot project design and construction.





None



12. SR 17/SR 9 Interchange Improvements-$4.0 million

Project Scope

The project proposes to modify the SR 17 /SR 9 interchange to relieve congestion and improve traffic operations on the freeway and local roadways. Scope includes modifying existing on- and off-ramps and local intersections and upgrading bicycle/pedestrian facilities at this interchange. The requested budget will fund completion of the Project Initiation Document and Project Approval/Environmental Document.





None




State-TBD$0.100

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% 2016 Measure B$3.600

Other-Los Gatos$0.400

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 55 of 63

13. SR 237 Westbound On-Ramp at Middlefield Road-$39.5 million

Project Scope

This project will address local traffic operations and bicycle/pedestrian accommodations by construction of a loop on-ramp from northbound Middlefield Road to westbound SR 237 in Mountain View. The requested funds are for the Project Approval/Environmental Document (PA/ED) phase of the project and right-of-way acquisitions.





None



14. SR 237/Great America Pkwy WB Off-Ramp Improvements-$1.5 million

Project Scope

This project will modify the westbound SR 237 off-ramp to Great America Parkway in Santa Clara to improve operations including modifications to local intersections and upgrades to bicycle/pedestrian facilities as necessary. The requested budget is for completion of the Project Initiation Document.





None



2016 Measure B$34.000

Other-Mountain View

$5.500

75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100%


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 56 of 63

15. SR 237/US 101/Mathilda Ave Landscaping Project-$3.0 million

Project Scope

This project provides for completion of plans, specification and estimate, right of way, and construction to complete the landscape contract for the US 101/SR 237 Mathilda project in Sunnyvale.





Ongoing maintenance costs will be the responsibility of the City of Sunnyvale and Caltrans.



16. US 101 De La Cruz/Trimble Interchange Improvements-$50.6 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation funds completion of final design, right-of-way, and construction for improvements in the vicinity of the US 101/Trimble Road Interchange in San Jose.





None




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2016 Measure B$50.600

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 57 of 63

17. US 101 San Antonio/Charleston/Rengstorff Ramp Improvements-$2.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide funds for the completion of Project Initiation Documents and Project Approval/Environmental Documents for US 101 southbound improvements at the San Antonio Road and Charleston Road/Rengstorff Avenue ramps in Palo Alto and Mountain View.





None



18. US 101/I-880 Interchange Improvement Feasibility Study-$1.5 million

Project Scope

This project will fund a feasibility study for improvements to the US 101/I-880 interchange. The project proposes to develop geometric alternatives to improve freeway to freeway operations, reduce the US 101 and I-880 corridor congestion, and improve local street circulation within the North San Jose area.





None




Other-City$0.200

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Other-TBD$1.500

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 58 of 63

19. US 101/SR 25 Interchange Improvements-$55.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation provides the remaining funding needed for completion of right-of-way and construction phases for reconstruction of the US 101/SR 25 Interchange and additional ramp lanes in Gilroy.





None



Expressways

20. Lawrence Expressway Grade Separation-$25.0 million

Project Scope

This project proposes to improve traffic operations by constructing grade separation intersections along Lawrence Expressway at Reed Avenue/Monroe Street, Kifer Road, and Arques Avenue in Santa Clara. The requested funds are for the completion of the Preliminary Engineering and Project Approval/Environmental Document.





None



2016 Measure B$55.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

2016 Measure B$22.500

Other-SC County$2.500

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 59 of 63

Express Lanes

21. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - Electronic Toll System (ETS)-$22.0 million

Project Scope

This project will develop and implement an Electronic Toll System (ETS) to support the US 101/SR 85 Express Lanes projects.






Ongoing operating and maintenance costs will be funded from future toll revenues.



22. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - US 101 Phase 5-$5.0 million

Project Scope

This project will implement a roadway pricing system on US 101 by converting the existing carpool lane to an Express Lane on US 101 (between the SR 237 and I-880 interchanges) and add a second Express Lane to create a dual Express Lanes system within this segment of US 101. The requested funds are for the final civil design and right-of-way services.









Other-Financing$22.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

State-STIP$5.000

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 60 of 63

23. Silicon Valley Express Lanes - US 101/SR 85 Phase 4-$10.0 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation will provide the remaining funds needed for construction to convert the existing carpool lanes to Express Lanes on SR 85 from the US 101/SR 85 interchange in South San Jose to SR 87, including the existing US 101/SR 85 direct High-Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) to HOV connector ramps and the approaches to and from US 101.










24. Bicycle Superhighway Feasibility and Alternatives Analysis-$2.0 million

Project Scope

This project will fund a feasibility study and alternative analysis for a continuous high-quality, low-stress protected bikeway between Palo Alto and East San Jose. The plan will ultimately identify a list of improvements that increase transportation options for the corridor, including connection to existing and planned bike trails and to the Berryessa/North San Jose BART station.





None



State-STIP$2.300

Other-Financing$7.700

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%2016 Measure B

$0.480Other-City$0.200

Other-TBD1.12

Other-LPR0.2

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 61 of 63

25. Countywide Bike and Ped Education/ Encouragement Program-$0.5 million

Project Scope

This project will deliver up to five countywide education and encouragement programs. VTA, in collaboration with the Santa Clara County Public Health Department will provide countywide support and direct services to encourage walking and bicycling, and to educate all roadway users on safe, responsible, and respectful driving, walking, and bicycling.





None



26. King Road Ped Safety and Transit Access Improvements-$2.816 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation completes funding required to construct pedestrian safety improvements recommended in VTA’s Countywide Pedestrian Access to Transit Plan and San Jose’s Vision Zero Plan along a 4.5-mile stretch of King Road in East San Jose.





None




0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

State-Active Transportation

$2.816

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 62 of 63

Complete Streets

27. Bascom Complete Streets Project-$10.274 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation funds environmental clearance, right-of-way, and 100% design to improve transit, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure along the Bascom corridor from I-880 to SR 85.







None



28. Story-Keyes Complete Streets Project-$7.668 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation funds final design, engineering and environmental clearance of improvements to transit, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure along the Story-Keyes corridor from Willow Street/SR 87 to Story Road/Capitol Expressway.





None




Federal-TBD$5.137

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%


0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a


Page 63 of 63

29. Tasman Corridor Complete Streets Project-$8.280 million

Project Scope

This project augmentation funds the next phase of improvements to transit, bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure along the Tasman corridor from Tasman/Fair Oaks to Great Mall Parkway/Montague Expressway. The planned activities in the two-year period include environmental clearance, right-of-way, and 100% design.





None




Federal-TBD$0.828

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

8.a

Ranking Project # Project Name

2 33 Rail Replacement and Rehabilitation FY20

3 67 FAST Program Implementation

4 32 OCS Rehabilitation and Replacement FY20

5 4 Electric Bus Procurement

6 31 Light Rail Crossovers and Switches FY20

7 28 Bridge and Structures Repairs FY20

8 11 Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion

9 45 San Jose Diridon Station Plan

10 44 Rehabilitation of Light Rail System Elevators and Escalators

11 12 Expansion of Bus Yard Electric Capacity for Bus Chargers

12 29 Bridge Repair/Hamilton Structure Stabilization

13 36 Upgrade Ohlone/Chynoweth Interlocking

14 30 Downtown San Jose Safety/Speed Improvements

15 41 Light Rail Station Rehabilitation FY 20

16 13 Facilities Equipment Replacement Project

17 42 North San Jose Transportation Improvements

18 57 SCADA Hardware, Software and Network Upgrade

19 38 Bus Stop Improvement Program

20 40 Light Rail Platform Public Address System Upgrade

21 6 Non-Revenue Vehicle Replacement Program

22 2 Bus CCTV Replacement

23 46 Transit Center Park and Ride Rehabilitation FY20

25 62 Caltrain Capital - Annual Local Match

26 35 Union Pacific Culvert Replacement

27 17 Guadalupe Train Wash Replacement

28 7 Cerone Boiler Replacement

29 55 River Oaks Campus Network Cabling

31 39 Light Rail Platform CCTV Replacement

33 48 Bus Yard Vehicle Management Solution

34 65 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans

35 61 VTA Gigabit Network Project

36 1 Bus and Light Rail Vehicle Mobile Router Replacement

37 37 ADA Upgrades at Facilities

38 58 Server Refresh

39 66 Facility and Fleet Plan

40 14 Fuel Dispenser Replacement

41 5 Paratransit Fleet Program FY20

42 8 Cerone Emergency Generator Replacement

44 9 Cerone Energy Storage System

VTA Transit FundProposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 ProjectsBy Ranking (Unconstrained Review)

Page 1 of 2

8.b

Ranking Project # Project Name

VTA Transit FundProposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 ProjectsBy Ranking (Unconstrained Review)

45 56 SAP HANA Data Platform Implementation

46 25 Replace Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) at Guadalupe

47 23 Replace Fire Alarm Systems at Guadalupe and Chaboya

49 18 HVAC Replacement Program FY20

50 26 Roofing Management Program FY20

51 19 LED Exterior Lighting Replacement

52 59 Upgrade Countywide Travel Demand Model

55 52 Geographic Information System (GIS) Program Development

56 71 VA Pilot Smart Shuttle

57 43 Pedestrian Backgates at Light Rail Crossings

58 53 Network and Gigabit Fiber Upgrade

61 24 Replace Roll-up Doors at Guadalupe Division

62 22 Pavement Management Program FY20

64 50 Disaster Recovery Cloud

66 47 Advanced Cyber Security

67 64 Community-Based Transportation Plans

68 27 Way, Power, and Signals Storage Building


70 34 Track Intrusion Abatement FY20

73 20 Painting Management Program FY20

75 51 Enterprise Database for Key Performance Indicators

77 69 South County Rail Study

78 54 Records Management Program

79 49 Chatbot Interactive Virtual Agent

80 68 Santa Clara Great America Intermodal Station Master Plan

81 16 Guadalupe Steam Rack Improvements

84 60 Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Estimation Tool

85 15 Guadalupe Entrance Security Improvement Project

87 10 Chaboya Yard Well Removal

98 3 Cameras for VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles

Not Ranked* 70 State Route 85 Transit Guideway Preliminary Engineering

* Project initially submitted under a different Program and was moved to the VTA Transit

Fund after the rating process was completed. Project is 100% funded by 2016 Measure B.

Page 2 of 2

8.b

Project # Ranking Project Name

1 36 Bus and Light Rail Vehicle Mobile Router Replacement

2 22 Bus CCTV Replacement

3 98 Cameras for VTA ACCESS Paratransit Vehicles

4 5 Electric Bus Procurement

5 41 Paratransit Fleet Program FY20

6 21 Non-Revenue Vehicle Replacement Program

7 28 Cerone Boiler Replacement

8 42 Cerone Emergency Generator Replacement

9 44 Cerone Energy Storage System

10 87 Chaboya Yard Well Removal

11 8 Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion

12 11 Expansion of Bus Yard Electric Capacity for Bus Chargers

13 16 Facilities Equipment Replacement Project

14 40 Fuel Dispenser Replacement

15 85 Guadalupe Entrance Security Improvement Project

16 81 Guadalupe Steam Rack Improvements

17 27 Guadalupe Train Wash Replacement

18 49 HVAC Replacement Program FY20

19 51 LED Exterior Lighting Replacement

20 73 Painting Management Program FY20



23 47 Replace Fire Alarm Systems at Guadalupe and Chaboya

24 61 Replace Roll-up Doors at Guadalupe Division

25 46 Replace Uninterruptible Power Supplies (UPS) at Guadalupe

26 50 Roofing Management Program FY20

27 68 Way, Power, and Signals Storage Building

28 7 Bridge and Structures Repairs FY20

29 12 Bridge Repair/Hamilton Structure Stabilization

30 14 Downtown San Jose Safety/Speed Improvements

31 6 Light Rail Crossovers and Switches FY20

32 4 OCS Rehabilitation and Replacement FY20

33 2 Rail Replacement and Rehabilitation FY20

34 70 Track Intrusion Abatement FY20

35 26 Union Pacific Culvert Replacement

36 13 Upgrade Ohlone/Chynoweth Interlocking

37 37 ADA Upgrades at Facilities

VTA Transit FundProposed FY20 & FY21 Projects

Ranking (Unconstrained Review)By Project #

Page 1 of 2

8.c

Project # Ranking Project Name

VTA Transit FundProposed FY20 & FY21 Projects

Ranking (Unconstrained Review)By Project #

38 19 Bus Stop Improvement Program

39 31 Light Rail Platform CCTV Replacement

40 20 Light Rail Platform Public Address System Upgrade

41 15 Light Rail Station Rehabilitation FY 20

42 17 North San Jose Transportation Improvements

43 57 Pedestrian Backgates at Light Rail Crossings

44 10 Rehabilitation of Light Rail System Elevators and Escalators

45 9 San Jose Diridon Station Plan

46 23 Transit Center Park and Ride Rehabilitation FY20

47 66 Advanced Cyber Security

48 33 Bus Yard Vehicle Management Solution

49 79 Chatbot Interactive Virtual Agent

50 64 Disaster Recovery Cloud

51 75 Enterprise Database for Key Performance Indicators

52 55 Geographic Information System (GIS) Program Development

53 58 Network and Gigabit Fiber Upgrade

54 78 Records Management Program

55 29 River Oaks Campus Network Cabling

56 45 SAP HANA Data Platform Implementation

57 18 SCADA Hardware, Software and Network Upgrade

58 38 Server Refresh

59 52 Upgrade Countywide Travel Demand Model

60 84 Vehicle-Miles-Traveled (VMT) Estimation Tool

61 35 VTA Gigabit Network Project

62 25 Caltrain Capital - Annual Local Match

64 67 Community-Based Transportation Plans

65 34 Comprehensive Multimodal Corridor Plans

66 39 Facility and Fleet Plan

67 3 FAST Program Implementation

68 80 Santa Clara Great America Intermodal Station Master Plan

69 77 South County Rail Study

70 Not Ranked* State Route 85 Transit Guideway Preliminary Engineering

71 56 VA Pilot Smart Shuttle

* Project initially submitted under a different Program and was moved to the VTA Transit

Fund after the rating process was completed. Project is 100% funded by 2016 Measure B.

Page 2 of 2

8.c

Proposed FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget

Capital Program Committee Meeting

March 28, 2019

Agenda Item #8

Changes Since February WorkshopVTA Transit Fund

2

• Project #67 (FAST Program Implementation) increased $2.844 million to reflect additional grant funding.

• Grant funding mix updated• Project #4 (Electric Bus Procurement)

• Project #9 (Cerone Energy Storage System)

• Project #11 (Electric Buses Charging Station Expansion)

• Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (LCTOP) funding

category correction (Federal to State)

Updated Proposed VTA Transit Fund FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget

3

CategoryAmount

(In millions)

# of

Projects

Revenue Vehicles & Equipment $37.0 5

Non-Revenue Vehicles $2.4 1

Operating Facilities & Equipment $32.7 21

Light Rail Way, Power, & Signal $52.9 9

Passenger Facilities $41.4 10

Information Systems & Technology $20.9 15

Miscellaneous $29.5 10

Total $216.8 71

Note: Totals may not be precise due to independent rounding

Updated Proposed VTA Transit Fund FY20 & FY21 Capital Budget by Funding Source

4

$99.6M--46%Federal Grants

$35.4M--16%State Grants

$6.9M--3%2016 Measure B

$14.7M--7%Other

$60.1M--28%VTA Local

Note: Totals and percentages may not be precise due to independent rounding

Updated Proposed VTP Highway ProgramFY20 & FY21 Capital Budget by Category

5

CategoryAmount

(In millions)

# of

Projects

Highway $189.1 19

Expressway $25.0 1

Express Lanes $37.0 3

Bike/Ped $5.3 3

Complete Streets $26.2 3

Total $282.7 29

Note: Totals may not be precise due to independent rounding

Next Steps

6

TodayCPC Recommendation of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021

Capital Budget

AprilProposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial Budget presented at

Board Workshop

MayCommunity Review of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial

Budget

MayAdvisory Committee Review of Proposed FY 2020 & FY 2021

Biennial Budget

JuneBoard of Directors Adoption of FY 2020 & FY 2021 Biennial

Budget

Capital Program Committee (CPC)

Committee Work Plan

Doc ID Short TitleCPC

3/28

Board

4/6

Board

5/2

CPC

5/23

Board

6/6

CPC

8/22

Board

9/5

CPC

11/30

Board

12/6

Potential

Future

Items

6946 Process and Controls for Capital Program I

6894 FY20/FY21 2016 Measure B Program Funding Proposal A

6945 Reaffirm/Provide New Policy Direction on Remaining

Measure A Projects

A

6942 Proposed FY20 & FY 21 Capital Budget A A

6805 Policy on Expansion Projects Operating Costs Provision A A

6937 VTA Grant Funding Process for Capital Projects I

Preview of Potential Capital Project Scoring Criteria Matrix D*

2000 Measure A Semi-Annual Report I I

VTP Highway Program Semi-Annual Report I I

2016 Measure B Semi-Annual Report I * I *

Update CPC Charter and Responsibilities In Admin Code

and Board Rules of Procedure

A

Recommended Evaluation Process and Criteria for Staff

Scoring of Proposed Projects

A

6622 Next Steps in Innovating the Way Silicon Valley Moves D

6623 Potential Value of Dedicated VTA Innovation Fund D

6624 What Does It Mean for VTA to be "Transportation Authority" D

LEGEND:

A = Action Item D = Discussion I = Information Item

P = Presentation V = Verbal Report * = Proposed

Revised: 3/25/2019

baltao_e

Text Box

10