WoodWard’s redevelopment

$6.95 nov/11 v.56 n.11

You painstakingly consider the utility, look and feel of your design. Choosing the right insulation/air

barrier is as important as any other decision you make. Our closed-cell insulation/air barrier provides

trusted long-term performance and enhances the durability of the building. WALLTITEECO fits

into any curve or corner you imagine, ensuring that you have a well sealed building envelope, giving

your design the high performing insulation it deserves. Learn how WALLTITEECO can enhance

your next plan at www.walltiteeco.com or call toll-free 1-866-474-3538.

WALLTITE ECO is a registered trade-mark of BASF Canada Inc. ECOLOGO is a trade-mark of Environment Canada; GREENGUARD Indoor Air Quality Certified is a registered trade-mark, and GREENGUARD Children and Schools is a service mark, of their respective owners; all used by BASF Canada Inc. with permission. © BASF Canada Inc.

WALLTITE ECO® insulation/air barrier fits perfectly into almost every space you design.

Plan to use PurPle.

2631-3E

april 2011

waltitE

consumEr ad

canadian architEct

gaylE

•

9" x 11.25"

280 %

________________

________________

_________________

___________________

2631-3E-A-Can_Architect_adB.indd 1 11-04-12 9:51 AM

Wire

Mes

h B

uild

ing

Env

elop

e, A

uror

a G

O T

rans

it S

tati

on, A

uror

a, O

ntar

io

NO

RR

Lim

ited

, Arc

hite

cts,

Eng

inee

rs, P

lann

ers

CANADA

UN

IQU

E •

TRA

NSP

ARE

NT

• G

REEN

Weavin

g Ideas

.net

www.w

eaving

idea

s.ne

tG

reg

Bry

son

1-80

0-32

5-59

93 E

xt. 1

257

gre

g@

wea

ving

idea

s.ne

t

Integrated design. Energy optimization. Fabrication. Construction.Discover proven solutions and a unique approach with Murox® high performance buildings. Use tomorrow’s technology to build performance today.

Canam, a world of solutions to support your creations!

Murox® High Performance Buildings

Better DesignBetter Buildings

Bak

ers

atW

ork

Offi

ce F

urn

itu

re, C

amb

rid

ge,

ON

1-866-466-8769www.canam.ws/murox

Montreal • Quebec City • Toronto • Calgary • Boston A division of Canam Group

Customized Solutions and Service

November 2011, v.56 N.11

Contents

11/11 Canadian arChiteCt 5

The NaTioNal Review of DesigN aND PRacTice/The JouRNal of RecoRD of aRchiTecTuRe caNaDa | Raic

LWPA

C

PAu

L W

ArC

ho

L

Ger

ry K

oPe

LoW

ed W

hit

e

15 Winnipeg airport expansion SPAtiAL riChNeSS, trANSPAreNCy ANd LiGht defiNe the NeW JAmeS ArmStroNG riCh-

ArdSoN iNterNAtioNAL AirPort termiNAL iN WiNNiPeG—the reSuLt of A JoiNt veNture betWeeN StANteC ArChiteCture ANd PeLLi CLArKe PeLLi ArChiteCtS. text herb eNNS

22 WoodWard’s redevelopment AN ASSeSSmeNt iS mAde At the oNe-yeAr mArK of heNriquez PArtNerS ArChiteCtS’

WoodWArd’S redeveLoPmeNt iN vANCouver’S troubLed doWNtoWN eAStSide NeiGhbourhood. text AdeLe Weder

29 laneWay housing LANeWAy houSiNG iS oNe of mANy viAbLe oPtioNS iN PurSuiNG iNCreASed deNSity

iN vANCouver’S SuburbAN NeiGhbourhoodS. text mAttheW SouLeS

9 neWs CentreforInteractiveResearchonSus-

tainabilityopensattheUniversityofBrit-ishColumbia;NorthAmericanwinnersofthe2011HolcimAwardscompetitionareannounced.

33 teChniCal JessicaWoolliamsexaminestheprogress

ofbuildingsinCanadawithnet-zeroenvironmentalimpact.

37 intervieW IanChodikoffinterviewsWinnipeg-based

architectsJohannaHurmeandSasaRadu-lovicontheprocessbehindMigrating Landscapes,theCanadianentrytothe2012VeniceBiennaleinArchitecture.

41 Calendar Modernism in Miniature: Points of Viewatthe

CanadianCentreforArchitectureinMont-real;ConstructCanada2011inToronto.

42 BaCkpage BrendanCormierprovidesaglimpseinto

theworkof2011SobeyArtAwardwinnersDanielYoungandChristianGiroux,whosesculpturesembodyexplorationsintomassproduction,modularfabrication,urbandevelopmentanddigitalmodelling.

Cover the WoodWArd’S redeveLoPmeNt iN vANCouver’S doWNtoWN eAStSide by heNriquez PArtNerS ArChiteCtS. Photo by PAuL WArChoL.

We acknoWledge the financial support of the government of canada through the canada periodical

fund (cpf) for our publishing activities.

­­EditorIan ChodIkoff, OAA, FRAIC

AssociAtE­EditorLesLIe Jen, MRAIC

EditoriAl­AdvisorsJohn MCMInn, AADIpl.MarCo PoLo, OAA, FRAIC

contributing­EditorsGavIn affLeCk, OAQ, MRAICherbert enns, MAA, MRAICdouGLas MaCLeod, nCARb

rEgionAl­corrEspondEntshalifax ChrIstIne MaCy, OAA regina bernard fLaMan, SAAmontreal davId theodore calgary davId a. down, AAAWinnipeg herbert enns, MAA vancouver adeLe weder

publishErtoM arkeLL 416-510-6806

AssociAtE­publishErGreG PaLIouras 416-510-6808

circulAtion­MAnAgErbeata oLeChnowICz 416-442-5600 ext. 3543

custoMEr­sErvicEMaLkIt Chana 416-442-5600 ext. 3539

productionJessICa Jubb

grAphic­dEsignsue wILLIaMson

vicE­prEsidEnt­of­cAnAdiAn­publishingaLex PaPanou

prEsidEnt­of­businEss­inforMAtion­groupbruCe CreIGhton

hEAd­officE80 vaLLeybrook dr, toronto, on M3b 2s9telephone 416-510-6845facsimile 416-510-5140e-mail edItors@CanadIanarChIteCt.CoMWeb site www.CanadIanarChIteCt.CoM

Canadian architect is published monthly by bIG Magazines LP, a div. of Glacier bIG holdings Company Ltd., a leading Cana dian information company with interests in daily and community news papers and business-to-business information services.

the editors have made every reasonable effort to provide accurate and authoritative information, but they assume no liability for the accuracy or com-pleteness of the text, or its fitness for any particular purpose.

subscription rates Canada: $53.95 plus applicable taxes for one year; $85.95 plus applicable taxes for two years (hst – #809751274rt0001). Price per single copy: $6.95. students (prepaid with student Id, includes taxes): $34.97 for one year. usa: $103.95 us for one year. all other foreign: $123.95 us per year.

us office of publication: 2424 niagara falls blvd, niagara falls, ny 14304-5709. Periodicals Postage Paid at niagara falls, ny. usPs #009-192. us postmaster: send address changes to Canadian architect, Po box 1118, niagara falls, ny 14304.

return undeliverable Canadian addresses to: Circulation dept., Canadian architect, 80 valleybrook dr, toronto, on Canada M3b 2s9.

Postmaster: please forward forms 29b and 67b to 80 valleybrook dr, toronto, on Canada M3b 2s9. Printed in Canada. all rights reserved. the contents of this publication may not be re produced either in part or in full without the consent of the copyright owner.

from time to time we make our subscription list available to select companies and organizations whose product or service may interest you. If you do not wish your contact information to be made available, please contact us via one of the following methods:

telephone 1-800-668-2374facsimile 416-442-2191e-mail privacyofficer@businessinformationgroup.camail Privacy officer, business Information Group, 80 valleybrook dr, toronto, on Canada M3b 2s9

member of the canadian business pressmember of the audit bureau of circulationspublications mail agreement #40069240issn 1923-3353 (online)issn 0008-2872 (print)

6 cAnAdiAn­ArchitEct 11/11

arC

hIt

eCts

aLLIa

nC

e

Ian ChodIkoff ichodikoff@cAnAdiAnArchitEct.coM

AbovE the new three-tower ICe deveLoP-Ment In toronto by arChIteCtsaLLIanCe wILL offer a CoMPLex MIx of ProGraM, ContrIbutInG to a vIbrant street LIfe.

tall buildings. After all, here is a city defined by its point towers and whose planning culture seeks to balance land intensification, views of nearby snow-capped mountains, and street-scape-friendly ground-oriented development—whether it be townhouses or retail frontage. Re-cently completed tall buildings, such as the Woodward’s redevelopment (see p.22) prove their worth in coordinating impossibly complex mixed-use programming that introduces the di-versity of city life within a singular high-rise de-velopment. Cities like Halifax have had a more difficult time—both within City Hall and with regular citizens—in accepting tall buildings in the downtown core, despite the establishment of view corridors and the desire to keep jobs and residents from migrating out to the suburbs.

Tall buildings have proven useful in triggering significant neighbourhood renewal, yet their success must be measured in conjunction with other factors, such as economic revitalization and social diversification. Montreal, Calgary and Winnipeg have each measured their approaches to urban revitalization in this way, to varying de-grees of success. For example, the City of Calgary deployed Canada’s first tax-increment financing model to borrow money based on future revenues derived from property taxes to redevelop the East Village neighbourhood—a large portion which will include the soon to be completed 60-storey Bow Tower designed by Foster + Partners. And then there are the suburban municipalities like Mississauga, Burnaby and Surrey that are experi-encing faster growth than their neighbours—the hegemonic cities of Toronto and Vancouver. Mis-sissauga has become the sixth-largest municipal-ity in Canada, and the many towers built around its central shopping core over the past 10-15 years have resulted in an ongoing attempt to cre-ate an intensely populated “downtown.” Nobody is counting the number of storeys on the Abso-lute (Marilyn Monroe) Towers in Mississauga, but the 50- and 56-storey condo buildings are intended to spur urban intensification in this largely sprawling metropolis.

Taken in the context of what’s occurring across the country, the responses by the three firms currently exhibiting at Toronto’s Harbourfront are interesting. Although they rightly understand the need to intensify our cities, accommodate population growth, enliven the street, incorpor-ate a sophisticated multi-use program mix, and increase the energy efficiency of buildings, they fail to emphasize the catalytic potential of tall buildings as tools for socially and economically dynamic urban revitalization. We need to expand our scope when considering the greater value of tall buildings. That is some tall order.

At Toronto’s Harbourfront Centre, a current architecture exhibition entitled Too Tall? explores the merits of tall buildings. Three Toronto firms—architectsAlliance, Kuwabara Payne McKenna Blumberg Architects (KPMB) and RAW Design—have each developed unique installations examining important issues of height, density and sustainability with respect to the future of Toronto’s towers.

architectsAlliance chose to answer the exhi bi-tion’s seminal question of “too tall?” simply with “not at all.” Their response addresses the fact that the Greater Toronto Area is likely to absorb another 1.5 million souls by 2020. Based on the realities of affordability and increased demand for housing, they argue that many more towers will need to be built in Toronto’s downtown core and inner suburbs for years to come.

RAW responds to the central question of height with “tall not sprawl.” For RAW, the most polemical firm to emerge in Toronto in recent years, intensification is a more important con-sideration than building height since high-density buildings are land-use-efficient, and ideally promote energy-efficient cities.

And lastly, KPMB’s response to the exhi bi-tion’s challenge is more provocative: are we building tall enough? In their view, we shouldn’t be thinking about limiting the heights of build-ings, but instead must focus more carefully on context, scale, sustainability, innovative program mix, and last but not least, design excellence. All three firms make interesting arguments, but per-haps the biggest critique of the exhibition relates to its premise. Clearly, the success of a tall build-ing depends on a variety of factors—only one of which relates to height.

The definition of an appropriate height for tall buildings is being debated in nearly every Cana-dian city. Vancouver may in fact have the best system of controls and understanding regarding

viEwpoint

GPC_GEN_M1_1023_CanArch_R1.indd 7-5-2011 12:22 PMSaved at NonePrinted At Client GA PacificMedia Type MagazineLive 8” x 10.25”Trim 9” x 11.25”Bleed 9.25” x 11.5”Job Title DensGlass PrintPubs Canadian ArchitectAd Code None

DEPARTMENT:

APPROVAL:

Addl. Notes: None

Art Director Copywriter Acct. Manager Studio Artist Proofreader Traffic Production

© 2011 Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC. All rights reserved. BUILDING REPUTATIONS TOGETHER, DENSGLASS, the color GOLD, and the Georgia-Pacific logo are trademarks owned by or licensed to Georgia-Pacific Gypsum LLC.

Georgia-Pacific’s DensGlass Sheathing has been standing strong for over 25 years. That’s nearly 20 years longer than our next closest competitor. Choose the #1 architecturally specified fibreglass mat gypsum product.

For a GP architectural specialist call 1-800-387-6823 or visit densglass.com.

DensGlass.® Because your name stays on every BuilDinG you DesiGn.

http://www.marvincanada.com

11/11­­canadian architect­9

news

Projects

the centre for interactive research on sustainability opens at the University of British columbia.Built in response to the global challenge of creat-ing a more sustainable society, the Centre for Interactive Research on Sustainability (CIRS) is one of the most innovative and high-perform-ance buildings constructed in North America today, demonstrating leading-edge green build-ing design technologies, products and systems. CIRS is a state-of-the-art “living lab” in which researchers from leading academic institutions worldwide can conduct interactive research on and assess current and future building systems and technologies. Partners from private and pub-lic sectors share the facility, working with CIRS researchers to ensure that the study conducted is connected to real-world needs of the community, industry and policy-makers. The outcome of re-search, product and policy development mani-fested from CIRS will play a fundamental role in accelerating the path to sustainability. Designed to exceed LEED Platinum and Living Building Challenge standards, CIRS is one of the few com-mercial buildings constructed primarily of certi-fied wood and beetle-killed wood (currently BC’s largest source of carbon emissions). Its wood structure locks in more than 500 tonnes of car-bon, offsetting the GHG emissions that resulted from the use of other non-renewable construc-tion materials in the building. Other net-positive qualities include reducing UBC’s carbon emis-sions, powering itself and a neighbouring build-ing with renewable and waste energy, and pro-viding water for inhabitants with rainwater while waste water is treated onsite. This 5,700-square-metre facility houses highly flexible classrooms, laboratories and office space in addition to lec-ture theatres, a public atrium, exhibition spaces and a café. Every workspace is daylit, naturally ventilated, with temperature and air under indi-vidual control. The CIRS project is almost 10 years in the making. Peter Busby, principal architect on the project, credits Dr John Robin-son, the champion of UBC’s Sustainability Initia-tive, for his patience, persistence and persever-ance seeing the project through to completion. www.sustain.ubc.ca/hubs/cirs

awards

north american winners of 2011 holcim awards competition announced. The results of this year’s awards program show that people-focused designs are at the heart of sustainable construction. The Holcim Awards Gold 2011 for North America and $100,000 US

was awarded to the Arctic Food Network (AFN), a regional food-gathering nodes and logistics infrastructure for the scattered Inuit commun-ities in Northern Canada. The project—by Lateral Office/InfraNet Lab based in Toronto and Princeton, New Jersey—enables better distribu-tion of local foods, serves as a series of bases for the reinforcement of traditional hunting, and also establishes new foundations for a sustain-able, more independent economy. Holcim Awards Silver went to a two-level zero-energy-certified school building design to be constructed on multiple campuses throughout Los Angeles. The project, led by architects Swift Lee Office of Los Angeles, uses off-the-shelf components and modular panels to create a pre-fabricated system that features a double-layered façade for solar, acoustic and environmental control, and achieves a climate-responsive solution for each site. Hol-cim Awards Bronze was presented to Julie Snow Architects of Minneapolis for a border control station on the US frontier to Canada at Van Buren, Maine. The approach meets a range of stringent regulations for safety, operation and durability, sets zero-net-energy and water- saving targets, yet is a highly aesthetic structure marking the national frontier.www.holcimawards.org/nam

winners of the 2011 toronto Urban design awards announced.Every other year, the City of Toronto holds Urban Design Awards to acknowledge the significant contribution that architects, landscape architects, urban designers, artists, design students, and city builders make to the look and liveability of our city. This year saw an impressive 129 submissions

containing a variety of built projects, visions and master plans, and student works, from which 23 projects were selected for Awards of Excellence and Honourable Mentions. In the Elements cat-egory, an Award of Excellence was given to Salva-tion Army Harbour Lightbox, and an Honourable Mention distinguished the Sherbourne Common Pavilion. In the Private Buildings in Context (Low Scale) category, the Shops of Summerhill earned an Award of Excellence, while three Honourable Mentions were given to the Dacre Crescent Resi-dence, the Regent Park Townhouses, and Rich-mond Town Manors. In the Private Buildings in Context (Mid-Rise) category, the 60 Richmond Housing Co-op netted an Award of Excellence, while the Printing Factory Lofts and the Robert Watson Lofts each received an Honourable Men-tion. In the Private Buildings in Context (Tall Commercial) category, two Awards of Excellence were given to Telus House Toronto and the RBC Centre. In the Private Buildings in Context (Tall Residential) category, One Cole and the Thomp-son Hotel and Residences received Awards of Excellence. In the Public Buildings in Context category, only the TIFF Bell Lightbox won an Award of Excellence. In the Small Open Spaces category, an Award of Excellence distinguished the West Toronto Railpath, while the Nathan Phil-lips Square Revitalization—Podium Roof Garden received an Honourable Mention. In the Large Places or Neighbourhood Designs category, Can-ada’s Sugar Beach was recognized with an Award

aBoVe­The­CenTre­for­InTeraCTIve­researCh­on­susTaInabIlITy­aT­The­unIversITy­of­brITIsh­ColumbIa­puTs­susTaInabIlITy­on­dIsplay­To­eduCaTe­and­InspIre.

perk

Ins+

WIll

­Can

ada

050TH51 9 6 1 - 2 0 1 1

PROGRAMS & SERVICES• Pre-Qualification of Roofing Contractors• Roofing Material/Membrane Evaluation• Roofer Training Programs• Inspector Certification• Roofing Application Standards Manual• Safety Training Programs• 5, 10, & 15 Year Workmanship Warranty

REPRESENTING ALBERTA’SROOFING INDUSTRY SINCE 1961

ALBERTA ROOFING CONTRACTORS ASSOCIATION2380 Pegasus Road N.E. Calgary, Alberta T2E 8G8Toll Free (in Alberta) 1-800-382-8515 403-250-7055www.arcaonline.ca

10­canadian architect­11/11

director of sustainable urban design think tank CityLAB. The Best Overall Entry for 2011 was The Palms in Venice, California by Daly Genik Archi-tects, which also took the top award in the Resi-dential category. In the Institutional category, the winner was the HKW Building at RWTH Aachen University in Germany by iParch, Imagine Envel-ope Façade Consulting. The three finalists were: the Centre for Justice Leadership at Humber Col-lege in Toronto by Gow Hastings Architects; the Artscape Wychwood Barns in Canada by du Toit Architects Ltd; and the Percy Gee Building at the University of Leicester in England by Shepheard Epstein Hunter. In the Commercial/Industrial category, five finalists were acknowledged with honourable mentions: King and King Headquar-ters in Syracuse, New York by King and King Architects for Community Benefits; 21 Queen Street in Auckland by Peddle Thorp Aitken Archi-tects for Resource Efficiency; Ergo Tower in Milan by Aste and Finzi Architetti for Reproducibility; First Canadian Place in Toronto by B+H Archi-tects, Moed de Armas and Shannon for Innovative Technology; and the Orange Cube in Lyon by Jakob + MacFarlane for Aesthetics and Commun-ity Benefits. The Zero foot print Re-Skinning Awards showcase newly evolving re-skinning design technologies and present new ways of

thinking about environmental sustainability. They also jump-start the discussion around how we might retrofit entire cities in order to massively reduce our collective environmental footprint. www.reskinningawards.com

2011 heritage toronto awards recipients announced.Heritage Toronto has announced the recipients of the 37th Annual Heritage Toronto Awards. The Awards celebrate outstanding contributions by in-dividuals and community organizations, as well as industry professionals and associations, in pro-moting and conserving Toronto’s history and heritage landmarks. This year, nominations were solicited from the public in four categories: the William Greer Architectural Conservation and Craftsmanship Award; Book; Media; and Com-munity Heritage. Independent juries reviewed the nominations and recommended the award recipi-ents. Heritage Toronto also presented its Special Achievement Award to the late heritage developer and champion Paul Oberman. The William Greer Architectural Conservation and Craftsmanship category honours owners who have undertaken projects to restore or adapt buildings or structures that have been in existence for 40 years or more. In addition to the quality of craftsmanship, appro-

of Excellence. In the Visions and Master Plans category, two Awards of Excellence distinguished the Fort York Pedestrian and Cycle Bridge and a study of Toronto’s Avenues and Mid-Rise Build-ings. The OCAD University Capital Master Plan and the Parkway Forest Re urban ization received Honourable Mentions. Lastly, in the Student Projects category, an Award of Excellence was won by Feed Toronto: Growing the Hydrofields, while an Honourable Mention recognized MaMmaL: A Mobile Media Lab for Regent Park Focus.www.toronto.ca/tuda/

winners and finalists of the 2011 Zerofoot-print re-skinning awards revealed.The winners of the 2011 Zerofootprint Re-Skin-ning Awards were recently announced at the US Green Building Council’s Greenbuild Inter-national Conference and Expo, showcasing excel-lence in holistic retrofitting projects from around the world. Winners were chosen by a jury of ex-perts in architecture, design, and engineering: Canadian architect John Patkau; Edward Mazria, Architecture 2030 Challenge founder; Thomas Auer, energy-efficient building design expert; Michael Ra, Front Inc. founding partner; Michelle Addington, Yale architecture professor; and Dana Cuff, UCLA architecture professor and founding

Unlimited selection

MATERIAL EXTERIOR GRADEBUILDING PANELS

HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATES

800.228.2238www.abetlaminati.com

HIGH PRESSURE LAMINATES

800.228.2238www.abetlaminati.com

MEG AD 4.5x13 4/11.indd 1 4/13/11 6:32 PM

priateness of materials, and the use of sound conservation principles, the jury considers how well the project meets current needs while maintaining the in-tegrity of the original design vision. Two Awards of Excellence were given to the John Street Roundhouse at 255 Bremner Boulevard by the IBI Group, and to the Seventh Post Office at 10 Toronto Street by Goldsmith, Borgal & Com-pany and Roth Knibb Architects. The Shops of Summerhill at 1095-1103 Yonge Street by AUDAXarchitecture Inc. with Goldsmith, Borgal & Company earned an Award of Merit, while two Honourable Mentions were given to the Pease Foundry Building at 211 Laird Drive by Goldsmith, Borgal & Company and to the Robert Watson Lofts at 363-369 Sorauren Avenue by Kohn Part-nership Architects. For a full list of winners, please visit the website.www.heritagetoronto.org

what’s new

isabella stewart Gardner Museum announces 2012 Fellowship in Landscape studies.The Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston is seeking a talented land-scape designer to hold the inaugural Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Fellowship in Landscape Studies in 2012. The bi-annual three-month resi-dential fellowship will recognize emerging design talent and focus on the role of landscape design in the contemporary city. The Fellowship will offer designers peer-reviewed recognition of design innovation and a supportive environment to develop the disciplinary and professional capacity for sus-tained inquiry into topics of contemporary urban landscape. The Museum invites applications from talented designers at or near the beginning of their careers in a range of disciplines, who are working on the design of public landscapes. Landscape architects and designers from a range of de-sign professions will be considered including architecture, engineering, urban design and planning, as well as horticultural and garden arts candi-dates who can demonstrate a significant engagement with the landscape medium. The selected candidate will receive a residency from June 1, 2012 to August 31, 2012 including a monthly stipend of $5,000 and an apartment/studio space in the new museum wing designed by Pritzker Prize-winning architect Renzo Piano. The Fellowship Jury is comprised of: Julie Barg-mann, University of Virginia; Alan Berger, Massachusetts Institute of Tech-nology; Anita Berrizbeitia, Harvard University; Julia Czerniak, Syracuse University; Walter Hood, University of California, Berkeley; Anuradha Mathur, University of Pennsylvania; Jane Wolff, University of Toronto; and Charles Waldheim, Charles Waldheim/Urban Agency, Consulting Curator of Landscape, ISGM. The deadline for receipt of applications is December 15, 2011, and finalists will be announced on January 19, 2012. The winner will be announced on February 9, 2012. www.gardnermuseum.org/landscape/fellowship

architecture canada | raic launches new services portal.Architecture Canada | RAIC has launched its new online services portal. Featuring many functionality and usability improvements, the new portal includes a modern and updated store and dedicated events registration sec-tion. All membership records have been moved to the new system, and each member will receive an e-mail consisting of a new username and password to access the new site, and the new web address. As with the previous sys-tem, logging in allows members to change their membership information, purchase products at member rates, and access exclusive third-party dis-counts. Additional features will be added to the services portal in an on-going fashion, including mobile access for personal handheld devices and smartphones, and an online form-based application process to replace the current PDF membership forms.www.raic.org

1.800.871.8876www.hambro.ws/architects

Our concrete floor system Offers yOu:

economical solution fire ratings uLC/uL Long spans Composite design engineered system sTC 57 Bulkheading eliminated

WHy NOT CHOOse

solUtIon?A ProVen

2011Board Members

PresidentStuart Howard, FRAIC

1st Vice-President and President-ElectDavid Craddock, FRAIC

2nd Vice-President and TreasurerPaul E. Frank, FRAIC

Immediate Past PresidentRanjit (Randy) K. Dhar, PP/FRAIC

Regional Directors

Wayne De Angelis, FRAIC (British Columbia/Yukon)

Wayne Guy, FRAIC (Alberta/NWT)

Charles Olfert, MRAIC (Saskatchewan/Manitoba)

Leslie Klein, FRAIC (Ontario Southwest)

Allan Teramura, MRAIC (Ontario North and East/Nunavut)

Jean-Pierre Pelletier, FIRAC (Quebec)

Paul E. Frank, FRAIC (Atlantic)

Chancellor of College of FellowsBarry Johns , FRAIC

Council of Canadian University Schools of Architecture (CCUSA)Kendra Schank Smith, MRAIC

Director Representing Intern ArchitectsW. Steve Boulton, MRAIC

Executive DirectorJim McKee

EditorSylvie Powell

Architecture Canada | RAIC330-55 Murray St. Ottawa ON K1N 5M3 Tel.: 613-241-3600 Fax: 613-241-5750 E-mail: info@raic.org

www.raic.org

MASThEAD PhoTo: LANGuAGE TECHNOLOGIES RE-SEARCH CENTRE AT uNIvERSITy OF QuEBEC IN OuTA-OuAIS | MENKèS SHOONER DAGENAIS LETOuRNEux ARCHITECTS / FORTIN CORRIvEAu SALvAIL ARCHITEC-TuRE + DESIGN | PHOTO: MICHEL BRuNELLE

ISSuE 33.3AuTuMN/WINTER 2011

The Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Architects with Archi-tecture Canada | RAIC is calling members to the rock for its annual Festival of Architecture being held June 12-16, 2012.

Themed Deep Roots in a New Energy City and held at the Delta St. John’s Hotel and Conference Centre, the event will feature Ted

Cullinan, hon. FRAIC, during the annual Fellows Convocation speaking about his world renowned firm Edward Cullinan Architects in London, England, and how its practice as a co- operative offers an unusual flexibility to respond effectively to the client’s demands.

Acclaimed local artists Mary Pratt, hon. FRAIC, and Christopher Pratt C.C., hon. FRAIC, will also be honoured during the four-day event, which will no doubt highlight local hos-pitality along with tours of the province’s truly unique architecture.

Watch www.raic.org for registration information.

In time for this fall the first two courses opened for registration as on-line offerings through the RAIC Centre for Architecture at Athabasca university: Professional Practice in Canada, and Professional Practice Management.

Meanwhile, Syllabus National Office in vancouver continues to offer a full slate of courses for students enrolled in the Syllabus program – 200 students were registered this fall.

Additional courses will be introduced through the RAIC Centre for Architecture at Athabasca as these are completed-work is already well-advanced on a num-ber of technical courses.

Architecture Canada | RAIC is committed to remaining directly involved in overseeing the operations of the design studios as well as the in-office experience component of the program. RAIC will also continue to issue the RAIC Professional Diploma in Architecture for Syllabus Graduates, who can then seek certifica-tion from the CACB and licensure from their provincial/territorial regulator.

Students will effectively be remaining within the same program, while transitioning to register through the RAIC Centre for Architecture for the updated on-line courses as these are completed and open for registration.

Syllabus Update Architecture Canada | RAIC launches new Services Portal

Check out Architecture Canada’s new on-line Services Portal featuring many improvements, including a modern and updated Store and a dedicated Events Registration section.

RAIC members have received an email with a new access username and password allowing access to Membership information, the ability to purchase prod-ucts at Member Discounts, and access to exclusive third-party discounts.

Festival of Architecture 2012 – a date set in stone

Downtown St. John’s | photo: Courtesy of Newfoundland and Labrador Tourism

Conseil d’administrationde 2011

PrésidentStuart Howard, FRAIC

Premier vice-président et président éluDavid Craddock, FRAIC

Deuxième vice-président et trésorierPaul E. Frank, FRAIC

Président sortant de chargeRanjit (Randy) K. Dhar, PP/FRAIC

Administrateurs régionaux

Wayne De Angelis, FRAIC (Colombie-Britannique/Yukon)

Wayne Guy, FRAIC (Alberta/T.N.-O.)

Charles Olfert, MRAIC (Saskatchewan/Manitoba)

Leslie Klein, FRAIC (Sud et Ouest de l’Ontario)

Allan Teramura, MRAIC (Est et Nord de l’Ontario/Nunavut)

Jean-Pierre Pelletier, FIRAC (Québec)

Paul E. Frank, FRAIC (Atlantique)

Chancelier du Collège des fellowsBarry Johns, FRAIC

Conseil canadien des écoles universitaires d’architecture (CCÉUA)Kendra Schank Smith, MRAIC

Conseiller représentant les stagiairesW. Steve Boulton, MRAIC

Directeur généralJim McKee

Rédactrice en chefSylvie Powell

Architecture Canada | IRAC55, rue Murray, bureau 330 Ottawa (Ontario) K1N 5M3 Tél. : 613-241-3600 Téléc. : 613-241-5750 Courriel : info@raic.org

www.raic.org

PhoTo En CARToUChE DE TITRE : CENTRE DE RECHERCHE EN TECHNOLOGIES LANGAGIèRES DE L’uNIvERSITé Du QuéBEC EN OuTAOuAIS | MENKèS SHOONER DAGENAIS LETOuRNEux ARCHITECTES / FORTIN CORRIvEAu SALvAIL ARCHITECTuRE + DESIGN | PHOTO : MICHEL BRuNELLE

NuMéRO 33.3 AuTOMNE/HIvER 2011

La Newfoundland and Labrador Association of Architects, de concert avec Architecture Canada | IRAC, invite les membres à se rendre à St. John’s pour le Festival d’architecture qui aura lieu du 12 au 16 juin 2012.

Sous le thème Des assises solides pour la ville des énergies nouvelles, l’événement se tiendra à l’hôtel et centre des congrès Delta St. John’s. Ted Cullinan, hon. FRAIC, du cabinet de renommée internationale, Edward Cullinan Architects, établi à Londres, en Angle terre, prononcera une allocution dans le cadre de la cérémonie d’intronisation des fellows. Il expliquera comment le modèle co opératif lui offre une sou-plesse toute particulière pour répondre efficacement aux demandes des clients

un hommage sera également rendu aux artistes locaux bien connus, Mary Pratt, hon. FRAIC, et Christopher Pratt C.C., hon. FRAIC. Nul doute que les délégués seront en-chantés de l’hospitalité des Terre-neuviens et qu’ils appré-cieront l’architecture vraiment unique de la province.

Consultez le site www.raic.org pour connaître les modalités d’inscription.

À temps pour la session d’automne, l’inscription a été ouverte pour deux cours en ligne offerts par l’entremise du Centre d’architecture de l’IRAC à l’université Atha-basca : pratique professionnelle au Canada et gestion de la pratique professionnelle.

Pendant ce temps, le bureau national du Syllabus, à vancouver, continue d’offrir une gamme complète de cours aux étudiants inscrits dans le programme – 200 étudiants étaient inscrits à la session d’automne.

D’autres cours seront ajoutés au Centre d’architecture de l’IRAC au fur et à mesure qu’ils seront prêts – le travail est déjà bien avancé sur un certain nombre de cours techniques.

Architecture Canada | IRAC entend bien rester directe-ment impliqué dans la supervision des volets « ateliers de conception » et « expérience pratique » du programme. L’IRAC continuera également de délivrer son diplôme professionnel en architecture aux finissants du Syllabus qui pourront dès lors demander la certification du CCCA et s’inscrire auprès d’un ordre provincial ou territorial en vue de l’obtention future d’un permis d’exercice.

Les étudiants déjà inscrits au programme effectueront éventuellement la transition pour s’inscrire par l’entremise du Centre d’architecture de l’IRAC, au fur et à mesure que les nouveaux cours en ligne seront terminés et ouverts à l’inscription.

Compte rendu sur le SyllabusArchitecture Canada | IRAC lance un nouveau portail de services

visitez le nouveau portail de services en ligne d’Architec-ture Canada qui a fait l’objet de plusieurs améliorations. Le centre de commandes a été modernisé et actualisé et une section est dédiée à l’inscription à divers événements.

Les membres de l’IRAC ont reçu un courriel leur fournis-sant un nouveau nom d’utilisateur et un nouveau mot de passe. L’ouverture d’une session leur permet de modifier leurs renseignements, d’acheter des produits en profitant des rabais aux membres et d’avoir accès à des rabais offerts en exclusivité par des tiers.

Festival d’architecture 2012 – une date à retenir

Centre-ville de St. John’s | photo : avec l’aimable auto-risation de Tourisme Terre-Neuve-et-Labrador

YOUR SOLUTIONS ON DISPLAY.

Inspiration. Information. Convenience.All in the palm of your hand.

New nora® on the go apps for the iPad® and iPhone® join our BlackBerry® app to create a library of mobile applications to assist you and bring nora wherever your work leads you. Download the app for your device today.

Follow us @noraflooring

www.nora.com/us/apps13

3230-2133_AppPromo-Ad-caD5a.indd 1 9/8/11 4:11 PM

16 canadian architect 11/11

Winnipeg Jets

the neW James armstrong richardson international airport terminal in Winnipeg is differentiated by spatial richness, transparency and light, providing a vivid interface With the dynamic prairie environment.

proJect Winnipeg James armstrong richard-son international airport, Winnipeg, mani-tobaarchitect stantec architecture, pelli clarke pelli architectstext herb ennsphotos gerry kopeloW

I was lucky enough recently to spend an evening at the Western Canada Aviation Museum (WCAM), enthralled as always by the exotic col-lection of airborne beasts of burden and stories of the legendary aviators who laid the founda-tions of commercial flight in Winnipeg. Well known for its extraordinary bush plane heritage, Winnipeg was an early waypoint for a number of experimental and workhorse aircraft that ush-ered in the era of commercial flight—onto the

prairies, into the bush, and across Canada. Among the many planes and artifacts in the WCAM, the Froebe brothers’ helicopter is one of the more exquisite relics. Built on a farm near Homewood, Manitoba in 1930, it flew before the famed Igor Sikorsky’s helicopter, and is a re-markable story of local ingenuity and invention. A Bristol Freighter CF-WAE with gaping clam-shell doors was purchased by Wardair in the 1960s to haul freight up to the DEW Line Radar

11/11 canadian architect 17

Stations. It guards the entrance to the museum. In the middle of the pack, a Junkers JU-53 CF-ARM (the Flying Boxcar) rests with its most beautiful skin of corrugated aluminum—and em-blazoned on its side is the bold Canadian Airways Limited insignia. This plane and its name are important, as they represent the role of Winnipeg in the history of commercial aviation in Canada.

Winnipeg’s new airport opened on October 30th of this year. A symbol of local ambition, ca-

pability and identity, it will fittingly carry the name of James Armstrong Richardson, in small measure righting a wrong enacted in 1937 by the federal government. In that year, Bill 74—An Act to Establish Trans-Canada Air Lines—essentially stopped James A. Richardson’s fledgeling and vi-sionary Canadian Airways in its tracks by con-scripting transcontinental airline routes for a publicy owned airline—the precursor to Air Can-ada. Shirley Render’s intensely researched book

published in 1999, Double Cross, details the com-plex network of political intrigue, cross-purpos-es, and manoeuvring that unravelled Richard-son’s dream. A bronze statue of Richardson will now grace the departures hall of the new airport in honour of his role as a pioneer of commercial aviation in Canada.

The romance and adventure of flight is a fading vision. Yes, the future is almost always brighter as one glides ever more effortlessly though the airports of the world. But today’s obsessions are seamless check-in routines, loss-free baggage handling, and on-time departures. These have replaced the pioneer aviator’s indifference to comfort as they crisscrossed the vast Canadian hinterland strapped into crudely hewn bundles of engines and ailerons.

To design a building with intimations of flight is challenging in consideration of the enormous logistical, security, and building-quality stan-dards administered by complex consultant rela-tions, and is also hampered by extended con-struction times. Add to these the current thrust towards LEED certification, and the odds of achieving an elegant solution diminish. Renzo Piano and Peter Rice did it at Osaka’s Kansai International Airport, and Norman Foster has accomplished an uncanny sense of lightness in the vast departures and arrivals lounges at the Beijing Airport. But in most cases an airport is utilitarian, and service-based. For the new air-port in Winnipeg, the project is anything but.

New Haven, Connecticut-based architect César Pelli designed the new terminal. He and his team captured the essence of the place, and rendered the ambitions of the clients in space and line—as a gently stretched aluminum-clad wing that can-tilevers well beyond each end of the curved fa-çade. Not all airports rely on metaphors of flight for their form. We are still in the jet age, and progress expressed in aluminum and steel may look like it wants to take off, but it’s all an illu-sion. “Despite what they say, we’re not like birds or even airplanes,” croons singer-songwriter Jim Bryson in his collaboration with Winnipeg band The Weakerthans. Nevertheless, Pelli’s design is inspired less by the technologies of flight and more by the perception of place. The result is a new glass house for Winnipeg that is differenti-ated by spatial richness and transparency and light—a vivid interface with the environment.

First impressions are lasting. A great deal of attention has been paid to the concept of an in-tuitive check-in experience and efficient self-service kiosks to hasten the boarding process. From the departures concourse, views are offered through to the airliners tethered to glass bridges. An arrival sequence that allows the public into

left a soaring Wing-like roof greets visitors arriving at the neW airport.

18 canadian architect 11/11

the baggage-claim area as their friends and relatives descend on a broad staircase preserves the rituals of greeting so familiar to us in the old ter-minal—an endearing departure from the usual checks and balances nor-mally deployed in similar conditions. This is a huge design breakthrough in airport interface transparency.

The presence of commercial enterprise is suppressed—none of the crowded and chaotic Heathrow Airport duty-free boutiques to be seen. A collection of discrete food service kiosks—with many operated by local res-taurateurs—stand in waiting, peripheral to the main spatial attractions, and are largely embedded in the building’s core mass. The entire operation fo-cuses on reducing travel anxiety while the luxurious space gradually dimin-ishes as passengers move into the lounges and transit the glass bridges.

Enormous flexible glass walls give the international departures lounge (generally for American destinations) room for expansion as needs arise. The designers were not able to achieve a single security wall, and late chan-ges allowed for a separate, distinct and autonomous international depar-tures stream—a small slice of the US in Canada.

The Richardson Airport art program emphasizes glass, with commissions by Ione Thorkelson (Incoming), Warren Carther (Aperture), Joel Berman (Inside Ice), and Jacqueline Metz and Nancy Chew (Where the Sky Began/A Map of the Land). Thorkelson has been blowing and casting glass in her stack-wall studio on Winnipeg’s Pembina escarpment for decades. Her interpretations of natur-al forms and animal parts in cast glass are exquisite. For Incoming, she has cast the wings of birds. These are elegantly assembled with a delicate tracery of supporting rods, braces and wires. A stunning array (flock) of the glass mo-biles rises up to the undulating ceiling, meeting currents of wooden air.

Circular perforations—a constellation of skylights—above the double-height baggage-claim area funnel daylight into the core of the building. Ringed with blue LED lights, they are visible from the entrance hall. The north-facing window wall of the departure lounges connects travellers with a truly vast and magnificent prairie vista. Scenes like blue-black winter evening skies and grey thunderclouds tracking in from the north and west will be a constant chromatic presence.

The airport’s planting regimen is largely designed to flourish without watering once the planting has been established. Energy-conservation strategies include a high-performance building envelope, radiant heating and cooling strategies, a common-condenser water loop (energy bus), ex-haust-air heat recovery, heat-recovery chillers, variable-frequency drives on pumps and fans, and daylight harvesting. The perimeter of the concrete floor plate functions as a solar heat sink, and perimeter radiant-floor heat-ing is engaged only when the sun does not heat the floor. A flue-gas recov-ery system is among the components that will generate a level of 95% effi-ciency in the heating plant. Low-VOC products and finishes are matched with high levels of fresh air pre-filtering and high-efficiency electrostatic media filtration. An education program is planned to inform passengers of the environmental life of the building.

An important element to consider is the fact that the new airport is a local enterprise. The Winnipeg Airport Authority was established in 1997 as a community-based non-share capital corporation. There is a lot at stake for Winnipeg—a small city in the midst of a significant economic boom where image-building initiatives are springing up everywhere.

A transportation hub at its core, it has been decades since Winnipeg has witnessed such a massive retooling of transportation infrastructure. Locat-ed near the airport, the new IKEA alone has required the public purse to fi-nance a significant portion of the $24 million in turning lanes and traffic

left, top to bottom high-performance glazing and exterior solar shading devices are but a feW of the sustainable design com po-nents of the proJect; a lively—bubbly, in fact—ceiling over the luggage carousels brings light and Whimsy to the proJect; a vieW looking back toWards the airport’s expressive roof forms.

11/11 canadian architect 19

signals necessary to service the new home-furnishings store, while both the federal and provincial governments are investing heavily in a complex transport infrastructure hub initiative called Centreport Canada. This sprawling expanse of 81 square kilometres (20,000 acres) directly north of the airport is intended to be a distribution, warehousing, and manufactur-ing hub linked to Richardson International Airport’s 24/7 cargo program. Centreport promises to be a logistics and transfer mega-mall with road, rail, and air threads and arteries extending across the continent and north to Nunavut and the High Arctic. With 15 active cargo airlines and 13 charter air companies, the Richardson International Airport is, and will continue to be, as Gertrude Stein said about America, “...filled with moving.” Trains, planes and automobiles—all are implicated in a rolling-out of the look, feel and function of the advanced 21st-century transport city.

From a standing start of 3.4 million passengers a year, the managers of the new terminal expect traffic to grow to 5 million a year in the near future. A constant flow of passengers—immigrants from the Philippines with their “balikbayan” boxes, NHL players carrying carbon-fibre hockey sticks, and visitors of conscience to the soon to be opened Canadian Museum for Human Rights among them—will grace the expansive pedestrian causeways and lounges in its first few years of operation. The most costly architectural investment in the province’s history points to the prominence of connectiv-ity and communication in this age of globalization and matching commun-ity-driven aspirations for a progressive image. The new terminal has finally landed—surprisingly—in the boomtown milieu of a city that is seemingly out of step with the turbulence of global economic trade winds. The managers of the Winnipeg Airport Authority took an educated gamble in 2004. What

above, left to right open and minimal interiors help mitigate stress for airline passengers; undulating Wooden ceilings provide much levity to the departures and ticketing areas, While a stat-ue of James richardson Watches over travellers. bottom the neW and expansive airport terminal at dusk.

client the Winnipeg airport authorityarchitect team stantec architecture: stanis smith, david essex, John petersmeyer, alfred moreno, kerr lammie, michel samaha, garry steinhilber, ken Wauhkonen, marcus rarog, perry piWniuk, erandi thammita ralalage, lisa ham, ralf lagman, Wanda slaWik, matheWs itty, leif aarestad, mohan tenuWara, myron pasaluko. pelli clarke pelli: fred clarke, mark shoemaker, greg biancardi, florence chan, luciana mello.structural crosier kilgour and partners ltd., halcroW yollesmechanical sms engineering, stantec, smith and andersen, the mitchell partnershipelectrical sms engineering, mulvey and banani internationallighting auerbach glasoW frenchcode lmdg building code consultants ltd.elevator gulay elevator servicesuniversal design design for all inc.Wind and snoW rWdiacoustics daniel lyzun & associates ltd.cost control hanscomb consultants inc.baggage handling marshall macklin monaghansignage apple designsairside marshall macklin monaghangroundside earthtech, snc-lavalinlandscape scatliff miller murraygeneral contractor ellisdonprogram management the airport site redevelopment team (parsons and Wardrop)area 549,000 ft2 program budget $585 mcompletion october 2011

an enormous act of pioneer faith in launching and completing such a mas-sive undertaking—with such elegant and sophisticated results. ca

Herb Enns is the Director of the Experimental Media Research Group and a Profes-sor of Architecture at the University of Manitoba.

0.5424°

FAA

FAA

FAA

FAA

FAA

FAA

FAA

FAA

20 canadian architect 11/11

aBOVe, LeFt tO riGht Brightly lit high-ceilinged corridors convey a sense of spaciousness to the airport facility; a deftly designed exterior fire escape projects from the terminal’s façade.

arriVaLs LeVeL

departures LeVeL

0 50’

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

1012

1314

15

12

12

1212 12

12

8 86

6

5

10

7 11

departures and arrivals hall

domestic concourse and

Baggage claim

international Baggage

claim

transBorder concourse

swing–domestic, inter national arrivals

1

2

3

4

5

6 regional

retail

airline offices

cBp offices

7

8

9

10 cBsa offices

municipal

support

waa offices

11

12

13

security

cBsa pil

open to Below

14

15

16

1

2

6

782

2

77

77

7

777

8

812 12

1212

14

4

124

9

4

5

16

0 500’site pLan

new terminal

immediate parking

administration control tower

existing hotel

possiBle hotel expansion

parking

existing parkade

future parkade

remote airplane parking

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

1 runway

future runway

taxi lanes

services

Buffer area

area for future development

water retention feature/ice skating winter

actc

2

10 11

3

4

5

6

7 89

13

15 16

17

117

17

15

15

14

14

14

14

12

12

12

12

10

6 66

2

12

BUILDING ENVELOPE CONTRACTORSRoofing Systems • Curtain Wall & Glazing • Architectural Metals • Service & Maintenance • Environmental Solutions

PROJECT: Winnipeg James Armstrong Richardson International Airport

PRODUCT: Modified Bituminous Membrance Roofing, Flynn Accumet 2000 Composite Panel Systems, Galvanized Corrugated Metal Cladding Systems, Accu-Steel Standing Metal Roofing and Interior Glazing.

Building Envelope from Coast to Coast. For more information, visit flynn.ca FLYNN CANADA LTD.

22 canadian architect 11/11

poor. In fact, poverty and marginalization would be embedded within the brand, right down to its highly visible public art—a Stan Douglas photo-mural depicting the 1971 clash of police and rebel residents.

One year after its official public opening, and a few months after the opening of the contempor-ary arts school, all of its programming (except for the daycare) is operating more or less at full cap-acity. Woodward’s is finally at a stage where one should begin to assess it with some measure of assurance and objectivity. But the heated discus-sions continue whether its architecture has fa-

turning a cornerthe redevelopment of the WoodWard’s site is proving to be a catalyst in the positive evolution of the beleaguered doWntoWn eastside of vancouver, harmonizing the diverse interests of the community.

project The WoodWard’s redevelopmenT, vancouver, BriTish columBiaarchitect henriquez parTners archiTecTstext adele Wederphotos BoB maTheson, paul Warchol

On paper, Vancouver’s Woodward’s District is not that singular: it’s a mixed-use complex with retail at grade, office and residential on upper floors, with an educational institution affixed to the whole redevelopment. All this, in the heart of the most derelict neighbourhood in Canada—Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside. But that terse description belies the epic architectural and pol-

itical saga that brought it to fruition.Not since Habitat ’67 has an architectural pro-

ject embodied such high hopes for addressing the needs of the marginalized. Moshe Safdie’s con-crete prefab modular experiment was doomed to fail as social housing, but now enjoys a robust afterlife as a stylish condo complex for affluent Montrealers. In Vancouver, the creators of Woodward’s pre-empted that ironic scenario by an audacious concept: the former department store would be transformed into a haven for the marginalized and a stylish condo complex, with a precisely orchestrated cohabitation of rich and

BoB

maT

hes

on

11/11 canadian architect 23

cilitated its larger ambitions. The short answer: hugely so, but not without a craneload of caveats and shortfalls.

The project comprises the bulk of a city block, the former footprint of the city’s legendary 1903 Woodward’s Department Store, bounded by Cor-dova, Hastings and Abbott Streets. Lead architect Gregory Henriquez designed the complex as four main components linked by a common base, but for the purposes of the building code it’s technic-ally a single building. That format allowed him much more flexibility in positioning the com-ponents close to one another, so that market

condos, social housing, office space and art-school studios are very close neighbours.

The City of Vancouver’s Co-Director of Plan-ning at the time, Larry Beasley, helped shape the project too. Following Beasley’s directive, the complex is bisected by a diagonal thoroughfare that is partly covered over the central atrium. The diagonal passage cleaves the buildings into semi-discrete entities, but they remain disarmingly close to one another, so that you can stand in the upper floor of one building and watch the office or domestic banalities that transpire inside an-other.

“I did that on purpose,” said Henriquez in a recent interview at his office. “I believe that real density is living in a city like Tokyo or New York. The problem comes when you expect suburban values in an urban environment.”

That problem seems to be clinging to at least a few of the condo-buyers and observers, who oc-casionally mutter about the continuing presence of booze and drugs in the streets. That’s a bit of a head-scratcher, considering that Bob Rennie’s deft marketing slogan—“Be Bold or Move to Suburbia”—was starkly honest about the neigh-bourhood’s gritty reputation, alchemizing it into a selling point from the dealbreaker it had long been.

The 1993 closing of the original department store had triggered a swift deterioration of the surrounding neighbourhood, with the vacant shell of the building becoming a political hot po-tato and magnet for squatters. Championed by long-time local activist and former city council-lor Jim Green, its resurrection and transforma-tion into a giant, sociologically diverse mixed-use complex was branded as the Downtown East-side’s greatest hope for regeneration. Some fear that the 200 units of social housing—built in ex-change for extra height and density—will not be enough to prevent the exile of the marginalized from the neighbourhood. Others fear the oppos-ite, fervently wishing the area to gentrify as quickly and fully as possible.

Any architect walking into such a fray needs guts and diplomacy more than any other design skill. Henriquez is, overall, a master of this pro-cess: he partnered with an excellent developer (Ian Gillespie of Westbank Projects, allied with the Peterson Investment Group) and crafted strong relationships with not only politicians and bureaucrats but also the marginalized community members who would be most affected by such a project.

In formal terms, the architecture of Wood-ward’s is distinctive but not heart-stopping. Its higher-end units boast the expansive views typ-ical of Vancouver’s window-walled condos. Its much smaller non-market housing units are sur-prisingly attractive in their graceful simplicity, and some of them have marvellous views as well, especially if you value an interesting rooftop over a generic swathe of sea. The project’s detailing, however, is of uneven quality, with a few tenants grumbling about the quality of the interior fin-ishings—in the luxury penthouses as well as in the units on the lower floors. (As one observer remarked: “All that ideological big-talk from

opposite The redevelopmenT—as seen here aT The corner of hasTings and aBBoTT sTreeTs—incorporaTes neW ToWers inTo a hisToric Block in vancouver’s doWn-ToWn easTside. left shooTing a feW hoops inside The covered aTrium.

pau

l W

arc

ho

l

24 canadian architect 11/11

form, yet somehow these oddball design gestures fit in perfectly for this particular redevelopment—a project whose larger ethos is the acceptance of eccentricity, individuality and non-conformity.

Designed by Henriquez and architect David Weir as an abstraction of bo-tanical form, the trellises themselves remain starkly orange and bare. They were supposed to be covered in lush foliage by now, but the strata council apparently never turned on the irrigation system. That’s one lesson the architects failed to heed from Habitat ’67, whose own irrigation system lay neglected and broken: never count on the collective to water their own plants.

The base and inter-tower area house the anchor retail outlets—a grocery store, drugstore and bank—all well-known franchises. The heady program-matic mix includes a coffee shop, bar, community office, Stan Douglas photomural, covered atrium, National Film Board office, federal govern-ment health office, and the complex’s main community anchor, a School for the Contemporary Arts. But the key component at the heart of the project is its public space and 200 units of social housing, an amenity that secured the financially crucial extra height and density for its developer while ensuring a bulwark against wholesale gentrification.

In terms of how it has changed the neighbourhood, broadly speaking, Woodward’s is working out about as well as could be expected. For years in visible and relentless decline, the surrounding neighbourhood is reviving, with small independent retailers and restaurants dotting nearby streets. Yet the marginalized inhabitants—those suffering from a combination of pov-erty, mental illness and drug addiction—seem to be safely ensconced in the neighbourhood and on the sidewalks. While most project managers lure their clients with promises of gentrification, the Woodward’s promoters ac-tually had to reassure the community that wholesale gentrifcation would not happen.

The proficiency of the interior configuration is also, in many ways, a con-sequence of this protracted and fraught birthing process. The Henriquez/Westbank team had already conceived the overall layout and massing of the building when Simon Fraser University was chosen for the four-storey non-residential tower. Proscenium Architecture, in joint venture with CEI Architecture Planning and Interiors, was in turn selected as the designers for SFU’s School for the Contemporary Arts. The arts centre has since been renamed the Goldcorp Centre for the Arts, a further source of consternation to locals, many of whom see the corporate deference as an ironic sell-out to

above The slender profile of The mixed-use ToWer is vieWed along The cordova sTreeT axis. bottom, left to right The covered aTrium; Whimsically designed concreTe supporTs draW inspiraTion from WoodWard’s iconic “W”sign; sTan douglas’s impressive phoTomural enTiTled Abbott & CordovA, 7 August 1971; a con-TexTual vieW of The redevelopmenT WiTh norTh vancouver and The mounTains visiBle in The disTance.

everyone, and in the end it all comes down to countertops.”) Its most visibly distinctive gestures—the steel exoskeleton’s expressionist orange trellises and the inner courtyard’s umbilical concrete staircase (the “stairway to no-where” as Henriquez proudly calls it)—are whimsical additions to the main

pau

l W

arc

ho

lpa

ul

War

ch

ol

BoB

maT

hes

on

11/11 canadian architect 25

the ideals of Woodward’s.The newly opened arts centre is a quantum leap from the broken-down

portables that comprised Simon Fraser’s contemporary arts school before it moved to Woodward’s. But its new incarnation is visually incohesive and logistically problematic in certain ways. To be fair, CEI and Proscenium were handed a more or less pre-designed container that posed a huge chal-lenge for accommodating a multi-disciplinary arts centre. The performance halls and blackout studios had to be stacked vertically, making for rather dark corridors even on the upper floors. Still, the interior design seems un-necessarily fussy, and detached from the character and purpose of the rest of the complex. Hallways are punctuated with pilasters of timber—“an hom-age to the Burnaby Mountain main campus,” says Proscenium principal Kori Chan. This metaphor is unfortunate, given that Burnaby Mountain has been progressively shorn of its forest as the university sells off the slope to condo-builders. Affixed to some hallway walls is a wood-and-polymer framework system to hold end-of-semester artwork, but they seem overly formal for the brash and informal work of students. Chan defends the de-sign as something that will evolve and be embraced more closely as stu-dents, faculty and staff become familiar with the building and how to use it. But, he allows graciously, “I’ll be the first to say it needs editing.”

Certain other problems, like the dearth of an effective wayfinding system, might sort themselves out in time. But the most trenchant and hard-to-fix problem with the arts centre is outside, not inside, and it extends to the en-tire building: its lack of interface with the street.

At street level, the crenellated brick wall vaguely suggests the idea of many smaller-scale stores than two or three giant ones, but it’s illusory. There are very few entry and exit points save for the main entry via the courtyard and a discreet door on Hastings Street. This is part of the careful and necessary balance between vitality and security. Just the same, the end result is the kind of streetscape that would have made Jane Jacobs cringe. The chain stores embedded at grade—Nesters, London Drugs and a branch of TD Canada Trust—are of such a large scale and monotony that they pre-clude the kind of flânerie and vendor interface that would make the street self-regulating. As a result, the streetscape along Woodward’s is largely de-void of people—the opposite effect of what was intended.

The presence of big-name commerce does offer undeniable benefits. As the first bank to open in the Downtown Eastside in decades, TD Canada Trust emits a message of calm reassurance. And the franchises, in exchange

above The sTridenT colour and inTricaTe sTeel Trellises of The resi-denTial mixed-use ToWer provide some much-needed viTaliTy To WhaT Was once a relenTlessly Bleak ciTy Block.

BoB

maT

hes

on

pau

l W

arc

ho

l

pau

l W

arc

ho

l

PR

OP

ER

TY

LIN

E

1

26 canadian architect 11/11

east-West cross section

north-south cross section

for tax breaks and other incentives, agreed to hire and train local workers in the area. Each anchor retail outlet has its own backstory, the narrative of which we might never know completely, but which has ultimately figured in the painstaking network of deals that built the project.

In terms of architectural configuration and urban vitality, the securing of high-profile retail anchors presents a problematic trade-off: the building is now circumscribed by an uncanny dead zone, interrupted mainly by the babbling life around the smaller-scale commercial outlets at the Cordova Street entry point. That clever marketing slogan “Be Bold or Move to Sub-urbia” implied a diametric choice, but the placid streetfront franchises sug-gest that maybe Woodward’s is now a certain kind of inner-city suburbia.

Optimistically speaking, much of the structure is malleable enough to evolve and perhaps be reconfigured over the next few decades. Jim Green himself has long cautioned against making a comprehensive evaluation of Woodward’s until at least three years after its 2010 opening. And in any case, some of its original goals are already manifest. The hoop-equipped atrium is attracting spontaneous basketball games; in the adjacent streets, new cafés and businesses are sprouting up alongside the Money Marts and pawn shops—even a new head shop, a sign that the spirit of the neighbour-hood remains unbowed and undaunted.

Perhaps the most potent symbol is the 30’ x 50’ Stan Douglas photomural of the 1971 Gastown riot, which overlooks the atrium-cum-basketball court. Although marred by interior reflections, this art installation provokes gasps of admiration from all social strata. Ascend to the top of Henriquez’s “stair-way to nowhere” and you can see the London Drugs sign reflected in reverse type over the riot scene, bannered between the foot of a woman running from police and the hindquarters of the constable’s horse. One can read it as an unwittingly vulgar metaphor: a corporate logo is chaining the down-trodden to the civic authority. Or it can be read as a hopeful symbol of har-mony: that corporate presence is offering a bridge between the two alienat-ed cultures. But of course, this corporate reflection was never part of the artist’s intention.

The designers of Woodward’s have faced a quixotic task in matchmaking the forces of a market economy with the trenchant needs of the community. The locals continue to debate, at times rather fiercely, about what Wood-ward’s could be or should be. That the debate is ongoing, vibrant and

above, left to right a vieW inTo The exTerior courTyard; The hasT-ings sTreeT forecourT offers a neW semi-proTecTed urBan space in The neighBourhood.

BoB

maT

hes

on

pau

l W

arc

ho

l

1

2

3

45

6

7

8

16

23

19

18

18

4

6

7

8

910

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

7

1 Td canada TrusT Bank 2 ciTy of vancouver non-profiT

space 3 childcare cenTre 4 covered aTrium 5 plaza 6 phs singles non-markeT

housing 7 sfu school for The

conTem porary arTs

8 loading/garBage/recycling cenTre

9 london drugs reTail10 nesTers food markeT11 federal and ciTy of vancouver

office12 affordaBle family non-markeT

housing13 cordova parkade14 W32 markeT housing

15 naTional film Board of canada

16 parking17 2nd sTorey Bridge To parkade18 W2 cafÉ + arTs collecTive19 ciTy of vancouver offices

0 10m

PHS SINGLESNon-market housing typical floor planTypical studio 357 sf

ABBOTT BUILDINGFamily non-market typical floor planTypical three bedroom 1150 sf

Q

W TOWERTypical floor planTypical one bedroom 643 sf

11/11 canadian architect 27

ground floor

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

1112

13

14

15

8

5

77 7

7

cordova street

hastings street

abbo

tt s

tree

t

cam

bie

str

eet

(often) constructive is a testament to how far the neighbourhood has pro-gressed since the 1971 riot days, when blunt force was the civic weapon of choice. The Stan Douglas tableau suggests that the way forward is not to ca-pitulate to the status quo but to stand up to it. The architecture of Wood-ward’s embraces the same values, but its own narrative will unfold and progress, one hopes, in the years to come. ca

client W redevelopmenT group (WesTBank projecTs/peTerson invesTmenT group)community partner phs communiTy services socieTyarchitect team gregory henriquez, peTer Wood, ivo Taller, chrisTian schimerT, jaime dejo, fred mar-koWsky, john cheng, arTour adamoviTch, zhong yan chen, BeTh davies, dallas hong, shaWn lapoinTe, Thomas lee, allan moorey, BeTTy quon, erik roTh, may so, frank sTeBner, michael Toolan, Terry Tremayne, fredy urrego, david Weir, phoeBe Wong, donald laBoissiere, maTheW Bulford, ellen scoBie, noreen Taylor, james Tod, BaBak manavistructural gloTman simpsonmechanical, sustainability, materials handling sTanTec consulTing lTd.electrical nemeTz (s/a) & associaTes lTd.civil ciTiWesT consulTing lTd.environmental—building sfe gloBalenvironmental—site eBa engineering consulTanTs lTd.specialized engineering Ted neWel engineering lTd./j.d. johnson engineering lTd.landscape phillips farevaag smallenBerginteriors—market residential mcfarlane green Biggar archiTecTure + designinteriors—non-market residential henriquez parTners archiTecTssfu interior architects proscenium archiTecTs/cei archiTecTure joinT venTureheritage consultant commonWealTh hisToric managemenTheritage architect jonaThan yardley archiTecTbuilding envelope rdh Building engineering lTd.construction management inTerTech consTrucTion group managers (2005) lTd.residential marketing rennie markeTing sysTemsarea 1,000,000 fT2 budget $330 mcompletion decemBer 2010

above left a hisTorical image of The WoodWard’s deparTmenT sTore in iTs heyday. left an aerial image posiTioning The redevel-opmenT WiThin The conTexT of doWnToWn vancouver.

abbott building—family non-market housing typical three-bedroom 1150 sf

phs singles—non-market housing typical studio 357 sf

abbott building—market housing typical one-bedroom 558 sf

W toWer typical one-bedroom 643 sf

van

co

uve

r pu

Blic

liB

rary

1 Td canada TrusT Bank 2 covered aTrium 3 plaza 4 phs singles non-markeT

housing 5 sfu school for The

conTem porary arTs

6 london drugs reTail 7 reTail 8 nesTers food markeT 9 affordaBle family non-markeT

housing10 cordova parkade11 W32 markeT housing

12 W42 markeT housing13 sTan douglas mural14 2nd sTorey Bridge To parkade15 W2 cafÉ + arTs collecTive

BoB

maT

hes

on

0 10m

0 5m

To le

arn

mor

e ca

ll 1 8

00 2

67 2

149 e

xt 2

128 o

r vi

sit

us o

nlin

e at

ww

w.in

terf

acefl

or.c

a. M

issi

on Z

ero

and

the

Mis

sion

Zer

o lo

go a

re r

egis

tere

d tr

adem

arks

of In

terf

ace,

Inc

.

Work from the illuminating notion that the sky’s the limit.

MAKE YOUR MARK

PRODUCT: Alliteration™ COLOUR: 9724 Mineral/Persimmon

L33LANEWAY HOUSE

Vancouver, BC

11/11­­canadian architect­29

Back to Front

Laneway housing in VancouVer is Fast Becoming a ViaBLe means to increased densiFication in the city’s suBurBan neighBourhoods.

teXt­Matthew­SouleS

In an era increasingly focused on maximizing the spatial efficiency of cities, it is not hard to de-scribe the omnipresence of the single-purpose service lane as anachronistic. Because once an infrastructure and pattern of use is established, it tends to be exceedingly difficult to dislodge. It’s not hard to understand why this is the case. Countless North American cities have innumer-able kilometres of service lanes, a shadow doub-ling of the named and therefore proper streets, devoted to the messy realities of parking, trash collection, and loading and unloading. However, at the outset of the 21st century, this phantom

aBoVe­oliver­lang­created­thiS­drawing­illuStrating­the­Many­potential­laneway­houSeS­in­one­vancouver­neighbour-hood,­including­hiS­l33­laneway­houSe.­Bottom­a­Section­of­lanefab­deSign/build’S­Mendoza­lane­houSe.

lwpac

network of narrow streets is increasingly con-sidered a territory ripe for dual duty, asked to emerge from its singular role as service space to be backed onto, and to become a space in its own right upon which architecture fronts. And through lane-fronting architecture, at least according to some, the possibility of a denser city emerges. Despite much conversation and debate, it remains to be seen what an extensive repurposing of ser-vice lanes would offer the North American city, but to get a sense, Vancouver—the continent’s pre-eminent working laboratory of contemporary urbanism—offers the best glimpse yet.

The city of Vancouver, with just over 640,000 residents within its 115 square kilometres, is al-

ready Canada’s densest city. There are roughly 5,000 people for every square kilometre. How-ever, despite this density, more than three- quarters of the city is zoned for single-family dwellings. Indeed, the vast majority of the city is defined by detached homes with front and rear yards. For such a statistically dense place, it’s re-markably suburban. In effect, very high densities in the relatively small central core outweigh more meagre densities in the rest of the city. The West End, for instance, clocks in at 22,000 people/km2 while tony Shaughnessy comes in at an almost rural 2,000 people/km2. Unlike urban morphol-ogies that more evenly distribute population, like San Francisco or Brooklyn, Vancouver offers a binary system: a compact and super-dense core, sitting within an expansive low-density field.

With the one million extra residents that dem-ographers predict in Metro Vancouver by 2040—combined with the geographic constraints of mountains, ocean and the Agricultural Land Re-

lan

efab

­deS

ign

/bu

ild

30­canadian architect­11/11

serve, increased densification in Vancouver is inevitable and low-density areas offer tantalizing territories of opportunity.

Within this context, Vancouver enacted its July 2009 by-law allowing laneway housing on essentially all single-family lots. Roughly 60,000 parcels are now eligible. Compared to swaths of new condominium towers or the re-development of industrial lands, laneway housing is ostensibly an insignifi-cant agent of densification. However, 60,000 new dwelling units represents a major expansion. If realized, it could absorb a population increase of al-most 20 percent. While zoning that supports some form of lane-fronting secondary dwellings is increasingly common across North America, it is still very much the exception. There is no such zoning in Toronto and Chicago, for instance. And the minority of cities that do permit laneway housing tend to do so only in certain areas or on sites with particular qualities. Edmonton, for example, allows secondary dwelling structures on corner lots as well as those along major arteries. Brent Toderian, Vancouver’s Director of City Planning, knows of no other city that has embraced laneway housing as wholeheartedly as Vancouver. In addition to allowing them throughout the city, Toderian points out that relaxed parking requirements and the con-tinued allowance of secondary suites are both factors that increase the viabil-ity of laneway housing. Considered in combination with the parallel allow-ance for secondary suites, the entire fabric of the city is now zoned for a minimum of three households. The single-family zone is a thing of the past—in effect, if not in name. The extent to which laneway houses will actually be constructed remains to be seen, but it is clear that a significant conceptual shift has occurred in the planning of the city, a major shift toward blanket densification outside the central core. It also represents a seismic shift in the thinking of the lane, a hidden but vast territory of the city.

The by-law is a tightly worded document that permits laneway houses on parcels with a 33’ minimum width. The standard dimension of a Vancouver residential property is 122’ x 33’ while in some areas of the city wider lots prevail. By prescribing an allowable footprint that extends 26 ft2 into the lot, the intent is that laneway housing occupies the footprint that would otherwise be a garage. On the standard lot, the floor area is limited to 500 ft2, plus a required exterior or enclosed parking space. Floor area exclusions enable an extra 125 ft2 if certain conditions are met. A second storey is al-lowed as long as it’s no larger than 60% of the footprint. Prescriptive direc-tives on massing are rationalized as a means to ameliorate privacy concerns and to diminish adverse effects on views and sunlight penetration.

In the two years since the by-law came into effect, about 400 laneway homes have been approved and there are roughly 60 currently in the ap-proval process. Approximately 200 have completed construction. Firms specializing in laneway housing, such as LaneFab and Smallworks, have emerged to cater to a growing demand. Judging from the completed pro-jects, what to make of the architecture and urbanism that the by-law is be-ginning to engender?

Given that most new homes built in the city fall into common historical genres such as Arts and Crafts or Victorian styles, it is not surprising that most laneway homes have followed suit. Various concoctions of gabled and hipped roofs, dormers, eaves, punched fenestration, and clapboard siding are the norm. Whatever one might think of these stylistic preferences, it is clear that in most instances the designers have not grappled with the most fundamental aspect of the laneway house: its small scale. More often than not, these “traditionally styled” laneway homes look busy on the exterior and feel cramped on the interior. It is as if they are attempting to be some-thing they are not—a full-size house—and in the process pack too many moves into a small volume.

As architects increasingly tackle the design of laneway housing, one can expect greater refinement in regards to scale. One recently completed structure that falls into this category is Brian Billingsley’s own laneway house on Vancouver’s West Side. Granted, Billingsley’s lot is 56’ wide, and therefore afforded him more space to work with, but it is nevertheless a

south eLeVation—tyner Lane house

toP­the­tyner­lane­houSe­deSigned­by­brian­billingSley­of­forM-line­architecture+urbaniSM.­aBoVe­a­conStruction­crew­inStallS­pre-fabricated­SectionS­for­one­of­lanefab­deSign/build’S­lane-way­houSeS.

forM

line­

arc

hit

ectu

re­+

­urb

anSi

Mla

nef

ab­d

eSig

n/b

uild

11/11­­canadian architect­31

site PLan—LaneFaB housing’s mcgiLL street Laneway house

toP right­SMallworkS­StudioS­produced­thiS­conteMporary­lane-way­houSe­which­containS­475­Square­feet­of­living­Space.­BeLow­a­few­vignetteS­illuStrating­a­nuMber­of­coMpact­inter-iorS­deSigned­by­SMallworkS­StudioS.

simple design that succinctly manages its small floor area to maximum ef-fect, and in doing so, shapes its peripheral exterior space. The wide site en-abled Billingsley to separate a two-car garage from the laneway house. This separation offers an interstitial space that functions as a private exterior courtyard. The plan of the laneway house proper avoids any unnecessary distortions, instead favouring a clean tripartite arrangement. A rectangular bar condenses all service spaces into one central strip of bathroom, closets, washer/dryer and mechanical. An open living and cooking space sits on the south side of the central strip while the bedroom sits to the north. These two main living and sleeping rooms occupy different positions along the strip in relation to the exterior space. The bedroom is pushed to the west to make room for an existing tree, while the living and kitchen space slides to the east in order to establish the courtyard. The result is an exceedingly simple and unencumbered space that makes the most of its small floor area while shaping the exterior spaces around it.

Another project that offers a provocative picture of an emerging typology is Lang Wilson Practice in Architecture Culture’s L33 project in Point Grey. As the project’s name suggests, LWPAC’s scheme sits on a 33’-wide lot and is therefore more prototypical. On this size of lot, it is impossible to achieve the maximum allowable floor area without incorporating two levels. LWPAC have unpacked the by-law in a meticulous manner to find opportunities for perceptually enlarging the space without exceeding strict floor area limita-tions. The result is a faceted, angular geometry in which walls incline be-yond the footprint and a double-height ceiling slopes down over the main living volume. A crystal-like form emerges from a rigorous by-law analysis. It is an approach like this that pursues the potential for new form that is unique to the parameters of laneway housing in order to animate lanes in a manner that is distinct from the more traditional frontages of the city.

If the rate of completion over the first two years more or less continues, it will take many decades for the city to build out its 60,000 lots. This pace will be vastly outstripped by the 30,000 new residents the region is ex-pected to absorb each year. Clearly, laneway housing is not a sufficient solu-tion—not even close. This might be worrisome if it were the only densifica-tion strategy being pursued. It isn’t. It would seem then that the greatest potential of laneway housing is not so much in the realm of densification, but rather to offer a heightened metropolitan experience to largely sub-urban areas of the city that are resistant to change. The foregrounding of the lane could offer an experiential thickening of the city at large. From this vantage point, the first crop of laneway housing doesn’t offer as much as it could. How future projects enrich the lane by truly treating it as a front through direct engagement so that the space of the lane fully enters the foreground of the city remains the as-of-yet unrealized potential of Van-couver’s by-law. ca

Matthew Soules is the Director of Matthew Soules Architecture (MSA) and an Assistant Professor at the School of Architecture and Landscape Architecture at the University of British Columbia.

SMal

lwo

rkS­

Stu

dio

S

SMal

lwo

rkS­

Stu

dio

S

SMal

lwo

rkS­

Stu

dio

S

SMal

lwo

rkS­

Stu

dio

S

Benefits Fewer installation steps

Membrane factory-laminatedto gypsum board under idealconditions

Perfect solution for installationbelow −5°C

Anchoring installation diagramprinted on each board

Self-sealing screws

Highly UV-resistant

Can help your project earnLEED® credits

2 products in 1Air/vapour barrier for walls + exterior-grade gypsum board

SOPRASEALXPRESS GSCREWS

C

M

Y

CM

MY

CY

CMY

K

SOPREMA_Pub Sopraseal XpressG.pdf 1 11-10-06 3:22 PM

1 877 667-2321norbecarchitectural.com

Marrying creativity with the environment.

Norex® is the most innovative architectural panel

in its category.

Norex®

PaNel with PolyisocyaNurate core

1 2 34 5 6 7

89

®

32 canadian architect 11/11

11/11­­canadian architect­33

technical

Buildings that give Back

An­exAminAtion­of­buildings­thAt­hAve­A­net-zero­environmentAl­impAct­indicAtes­thAt­progress­is­much­slower,­but­more­pro-found­thAn­whAt­one­might­hAve­expected.

teXt­JessicA­woolliAms

Since sustainable development was defined by the Brundtland Commis-sion’s report Our Common Future in 1987, tens if not hundreds of thousands of “green” buildings and communities—of various shades and types—have been built around the world. Green buildings and sustainable communities are not going away. In fact, many of the leaders in the industry appear to be narrowing their sights on a new set of goals: buildings and communities that aim for either no negative impact—or a positive impact—on planetary ecosystems.

It used to be that simply having a LEED-certified building or another of the certification systems in existence around the world was enough to claim the mantle of industry leadership. This is clearly no longer the case. With the GreenLife Business Centre, Canada’s first net-energy-positive office building breaking ground in Milton, Ontario last February—no doubt spurred by Ontario’s Feed-In Tariff program (FIT) that encourages onsite production of renewable energy—there is evidence that the bar of sustain-able design is being raised. The trend includes:• The roughly 100 residential net-zero-energy (NZE) projects and 20 com-mercial NZE projects built in North America (with perhaps the same num-ber set to break ground over the next year).• Four Living Buildings certified and at least 80 more registered in North America.1 • Numerous governments in Canada and the US are not only setting both

ed­white

policy goals and regulatory requirements towards net-zero energy as a goal for buildings and communities but also net-zero water, waste and toxics, etc.• Voluntary efforts such as Metro Vancouver’s Zero Waste Challenge and Seattle’s efforts to identify regulatory pathways for Seattle-area projects pursuing net-zero water strategies, which builds on Seattle City Council’s 2009 Living Building Pilot Program Ordinance.• Mandates such as California’s upcoming requirements that all new resi-dential construction be “zero-net energy” starting in 2020; commercial construction by 2030.

This article gives a very brief overview of this emerging industry direc-tion, asking where did it come from, where is it now, and where is it going?

Where did this come From?The rise of net-zero or positive-impact buildings and communities over the last decade has been the result of many things. First, scientists and their allies are doing a better job of communi cating an increasingly clear understanding of troubling human impacts on global ecosystems. Secondly, international standards and programs that move the construction of buildings and com-munities as close as possible to zero environmental impact are slowly having

aBOve­designed­by­cei­Architecture­plAnning­And­interiors,­the­recently­opened­okAnAgAn­college­centre­of­excellence­is­­setting­its­sights­on­becoming­A­net-zero-energy­building­­And­pArt­of­the­living­building­chAllenge.­the­new­fAcility­is­expected­to­use­65­kilowAtt-hours­of­energy­per­squAre­metre­per­yeAr,­positioning­the­building­As­one­of­the­most­energy-efficient­in­north­AmericA.

34­canadian architect­11/11

some influence on North America. These influences are too numerous to list but on the energy front, they include the German Feed-In Tariff (FIT) system that encourages the development of renewables by requiring utilities to pay increased prices for them. This tariff system inspired other FIT systems around the world. Secondly, other influences include the passive-house stan-dard where tens of thousands of buildings have proven that massive energy efficiencies are both possible and affordable. Thirdly, a general movement towards low- and zero- or positive-energy building laws across the EU, in-cluding France, where all public buildings must be energy-positive by 2020.

Not just limited to Europe, net-zero buildings and communities are pop-ping up throughout Asia and Africa. The developing world may in fact emerge as a leader in off-grid and low- or no-impact buildings and neigh-bourhoods for two simple reasons. Firstly, the existing infrastructure in most developing countries is completely inadequate and unreliable. Sec-ondly, there is often neither the time nor investment capital to build large infrastructure projects to support the urban development that is in demand. “Just as many African and Asian nations have leaped right over the wired telephone phase and completely embraced the mobile phone, they may also skip right over central power, water and wastewater utilities and adopt decentralized models. This is a powerful incentive to develop small, incre-mental, self-reliant local utilities and zero-net buildings,” says David Rousseau, a BC-based building design and community-sustainability con-sultant working internationally.

In terms of water use—in addition to the work going on with Washington and Oregon state authorities interested in enabling the Living Building Challenge discussed above—Australia, Asia and Africa are beginning to de-sign and build projects aiming for net-zero water. Simon Fraser University Professor Meg Holden’s research in Melbourne, Australia focuses on the sustainability plans for urban waterfront redevelopment projects: “Both Melbourne and Sydney compete for recognition as the hub of sustainable building excellence in the southern hemisphere.” When asked about the differences between those Australian projects and leading projects in Can-ada, she notes: “The signature waterfront redevelopment projects in both cities—Melbourne’s Docklands and Barangaroo in Sydney—have plans to go further in water conservation and recycling than Vancouver’s Olympic Village. Ground has not yet been broken on Barangaroo but the commercial buildings in Melbourne’s Docklands include technologies such as black-water recycling, where as the Olympic Village doesn’t even recycle their greywater. Barangaroo’s goal is to be water-positive: the ability to process and return clean water to downtown Sydney. However, Holden warns that “the infrastructure for going beyond the precinct scale in this way, and who will pay for it and make it work remains unclear. We may be facing the same overall impulse toward sustainable neighbourhoods as the Australians, but the different political, cultural, and governance facets of managing the tran-sition make comparing leading international performance difficult.”

In understanding the reasons for the rise of net-zero or positive-impact buildings and communities over the last decade, another major impact is the coalitions between business, non-governmental organizations and others that have resulted in market-based standards such as LEED (in North America and around the world), BREAM (in the UK, parts of the EU and Asia), and Green Star (in Australia, New Zealand and South Africa). Policymakers and clients have been using these standards to require a high-er standard, and are therefore eager to signal the next level of leadership. In this context, the Living Building Challenge (LBC) has emerged as the only standard that offers a way of pushing buildings not just to net-zero- environmental-impact design, but also performance, as the certification is not awarded until at least a year’s worth of performance data proves the building is living up to its design goals. Given that the LBC was authored by Cana dian-born Jason F. McLennan—who is also the CEO of the Cascadia Green Building Council, it seems appropriate to begin to answer the ques-tion of “where is it now” using a list of recent projects in British Columbia.

tOP­the­lArgest­ArrAy­of­photovoltAic­solAr­pAnels­in­western­cAnAdA­generAtes­electricity­for­the­okAnAgAn­college­cen-tre­of­excellence.­Middle­designed­by­perkins+will­cAnAdA,­the­recently­opened­vAndusen­botAnicAl­gArden­visitor­centre­in­vAncouver­is­designed­to­be­net-zero­energy,­with­All­energy­needs­supplied­by­on-site­renewAble­sources,­such­As­solAr­photovoltAic­pAnels.­nAturAl­ventilAtion­is­Assisted­by­A­solAr­“heAt­sink”­integrAted­with­An­operAble­glAzed­oculus­in­the­centre­of­the­fAcility.­aBOve­photovoltAics­plAced­Atop­the­net-zero-energy­building­in­vAncouver’s­olympic­villAge.

ed­w

hit

epe

rkin

s+w

ill­c

AnAd

Ac

ity­

of­

vAn

co

uve

r

11/11­­canadian architect­35

BC is a great example of how quickly this new in-dustry focus is emerging: note that all of these projects were built in or after 2008.

Where is it now? completed net-Zero-energy and net-Zero-impact Buildings and communities in and near British columbiaThe sidebar on the right provides an overview of some of the better-known projects aspiring for net zero—either in terms of energy, water or net- zero-energy impact (NZEI). The list of projects only includes those that are either built, nearly complete (such as the Simon Fraser University childcare project, and Burnaby’s Harmony House—a Canada Mortgage and Housing Corpor-ation (CMHC) Equilibrium project), or under construction (such as Seattle’s Cascadia Center and the ongoing 2030 District). The chart doesn’t include a number of recent projects such as the Whistler Passive House that was in fact not aim-ing for net-zero energy, or Seattle’s 2030 District which is aiming for net-zero carbon by 2030. It also doesn’t include: just off the map in Port-land—but still definitely in Cascadia—many net-zero-energy projects, some of which are still in design, and several of which are occupied al-ready, including the 15 involved in the Energy Trust of Oregon’s Path to Net Zero pilot project, of which three to four will be complete this year. Also not included are many more projects in BC and surrounding areas that are in design and slated for construction—for instance, larger com-mercial renovation projects such as the Old Van-couver Stock Exchange Building Development (aiming for LEED Platinum and the LBC).

Probably the most critical caveat about many of the recently listed projects pertains to building performance. Only those projects listed on the chart that are aiming for the LBC are actually aiming for net-zero environmental impact. Many others are striving for multiple environmental goals—such as zHome—with rigorous perform-ance in water and other areas, and all of CMHC’s Equilibrium projects, but none set their sights on reaching zero impact in all areas. Second, the LBC remains the only way to actually ensure per-formance of a net-zero-impact building. Even then, there are exceptions for market realities that mean many of the projects built to this stan-dard will not actually be neutral with respect to the environment; they will still have an impact. For example, the definition of net-zero energy now allowed by the LBC allows for some flexibil-ity to accommodate market realities that will not exist in the future. Currently, a project is still al-lowed to take in grid-sourced electrical energy and balance the equation by returning heat. However, this exception and the many others within the LBC will be eliminated over time as market realities adjust.

Is it fair to focus on BC as a snapshot of this

new industry direction, or is this movement a regional trend that is destined to pass? BC is, of course, the province with a carbon tax, and where Rich Coleman, former Minister of Housing and Social Development in the province, stated in a talk to the building industry in May 2010 that “By 2020, my challenge to you is to be building housing that is net zero for greenhouse gas emis-sions with superior airtightness and insulation that will enable net-zero-energy performance through the addition of renewable energy gener-ation such as solar panels.” BC is also the region where the LBC was born. For these reasons, it may seem an outlier in Canada, rather than a bellwether. However, some industry experts are predicting less of a rise in strict net-zero projects in BC than in Ontario, where the Feed-In Tariff and growing solar industry will potentially enable more financially sustainable net-zero-energy projects sooner. Due to BC’s historic leadership in birthing the Canada Green Building Council and adopting LEED over a decade ago, it seems quite natural that BC will remain a leader in this emerging industry.

Predicting the Future?Jason McLennan is in a hurry to build the future that he wants. “We are thrilled with the uptake of the challenge and how it has changed the nature of the discussion about what’s possible. There are projects popping up everywhere and it’s really gratifying. I believe we are closing in on 100 pro-jects worldwide. This does not count all the projects pursuing it that haven’t registered, or projects that are using it as a framework or tool for thinking about the issues. And so, the actual number of projects we are affecting is much greater. Every time a project gets built, it has a huge ripple effect in terms of changing percep-tions and other impacts.”

What about all those who claim that this is fi-nancially impossible? James S. Emery, a partner at Iredale Group Architecture in Vancouver, is working on the old Vancouver Stock Exchange Building development in downtown Vancouver: “We are pursuing partial LBC certification through the Water Petal and LEED Platinum cer-tification processes. The LBC forces one in a high-density urban core to look beyond the prop-erty boundaries when pursuing the Energy Petal. Unfortunately, there are no non-combustible re-newable district energy sources in Vancouver.2 As such, it is currently impossible and will likely remain this way in the foreseeable future for a project such as ours to achieve full LBC certifica-tion.” While a downtown high-rise renovation may be impossible, other project types are not. Dale Mikkelsen, Director of Development at SFU Community Trust, speaks about their UniverCity Childcare Centre that is aiming for the LBC: “The project is currently tracking against locally

available price benchmarks for stand-alone childcare facilities at 10 to 15 percent below deliv-ery cost of a turnkey LEED Silver facility.”

Thomas Mueller, President and CEO of the Canada Green Building Council, says that “We need to look at buildings that perform at a much higher level. That is the future and we need to start it now. From the realities of the market per-spective—net zero may not always make sense today but from the realities of climate change, net zero is our future, so it doesn’t make sense to ignore it.”

Net-zero-environmental-impact buildings and communities are seen by some to be finan-cial or physical impossibilities, and by others to be necessary if we are to sustain humanity on this small planet. Either way, it is worth keeping your eye on this trend, as I predict it will get a lot more attention in the years to come. ca

With over a decade of experience in sustainable policy, planning and education, Jessica Woolliams has a passion for making change towards environ-mental and social sustainability at the level of buildings, institutions and communities. For more information, see www.jessicawoolliams.com.

1 The Living Building Challenge “defines the most ad-vanced measure of sustainability in the built environment possible today and acts to diminish the gap between cur-rent limits and ideal solutions,” according to the Inter-national Living Future Institute within which the standard is housed. There are buildings aiming for net-zero energy, water, GHG, toxins, etc.

2 The Living Building Challenge does not allow combustion of any kind.

recent net-Zero-energy Projects•  Drake Landing Solar Community, Okotoks, Alberta 

(2007)•  Baird Residence, Vancouver Island, BC—Living 

Building Petal Certified (2008)•  Riverdale NetZero Project, Edmonton, Alberta 

(2008)•  Avalon’s Discovery 3 House, Alberta (2008)•  Avalon’s Discovery 4 House, Alberta (2010)•  Lopez Community Land Trust Workforce Homes, 

Lopez Island, Washington (2009)•  Green Dream House, Kamloops, BC—1 of 14 

across Canada (2010)•  Net-Zero Residence, Smithers, BC (2009)•  West House, Vancouver, BC (2010)•  Net-Zero-Energy Building at Olympic Village,  

Vancouver, BC (2010)•  zHome, Issaquah, Washington—first net-zero- 

energy development and education centre (2011)•  CMHC Harmony House, Burnaby, BC (2011)

net-Zero-energy Projects aiming for living Building challenge•  CIRS, University of British Columbia (2011)•  Okanagan College Centre of Excellence, Penticton, 

BC (2011)•  Bertschi School, Seattle, Washington (2010)•  Simon Fraser UniverCity’s Childcare Project (2011)•  VanDusen Botanical Garden Visitor Centre,  

Vancouver, BC (2011)•  Cascadia Center, Seattle, Washington (2012)

Energy

Indoor Climate Environment

Health & Comfort

A beacon for sustainable design

Green lighthouse Is one of the six Model Home 2020 projects the VELUX Group is working on. We are working hard today on solutions for tomorrow through collaboration on innovative structures with an ideal balance of energy efficiency, architectural quality, a healthy indoor climate and optimal daylight conditions.

Green Lighthouse has won numerous awards for its sustainable and visionary design. For more details, visit velux.com/modelhome2020.

velux.ca VELUX Canada Inc.

Cdn Arch Jan 2011 Ad Final.indd 1 1/21/11 3:27 PM

11/11­­canadian architect­37

interview

Migrating Landscapes

An­interview­with­two­of­the­orgAnizers­of­CAnAdA’s­exhibition­At­the­2012­veniCe­biennAle­in­ArChiteCture­reveAls­some­of­their­thoughts­on­identity­And­the­evolv-ing­Culture­of­design­emerging­from­the­Current­generAtion­of­young­ArChiteCts.

interviewer­iAn­Chodikoff

Migrating Landscapes will be Canada’s representa-tive at the 2012 Venice Biennale in Architecture. The project was initiated by Sasa Radulovic and Johanne Hurme of Winnipeg-based firm 5468796 Architecture Inc. and University of Manitoba architecture professor Jae-Sung Chon. To develop this highly collaborative and inclusive exhibition project, these energetic individuals have established Migrating Landscapes Organizer (MLO), an entity that will evolve into a forum for young Canadian architects and designers to “in-vestigate, provoke, document and expose the unique manifestations of cultural memory that overlay contemporary Canadian architecture cul-ture.” Radulovic, Hurme and Chon are all immi-grants to Canada from the former Yugoslavia,

aBOve­imAges­of­some­of­the­120­entries­reCeived­by­the­orgAnizers­for­CAnAdA’s­offiCiAl­entry­to­the­2012­veniCe­bien-nAle­in­ArChiteCture.

Finland and South Korea respectively. Their own cultural backgrounds have influenced their out-look on architecture; accordingly, Migrating Landscapes will incorporate a collection of their own experiences relating to cultural memory, as well as those of the architects and designers se-lected to participate in the exhibition. MLO has already begun a fundraising campaign, and Can-adian Architect intends to follow the unique evo-lution of MLO right up until the exhibition’s opening in Venice next summer. The following discussion is an excerpt from a recent interview with Radulovic (SR) and Hurme (JH) about their project, their intentions and some of the ideas behind MLO.

MLO seeks to establish a series of condi-tions for a project that is unusually inclu-sive while highly purposeful to influence a diverse and progressive design culture. can you describe your vision for this project?

sr It is very hard to include a singular vision for the project. We would like to raise the level of

architecture in Canada through increased public engagement and exhibitions so that our profes-sion can put its best foot forward in Venice. Our fundraising and preparations seem to be going well because we are getting interest from young architects, and we are receiving interest from the various members of the juries established across Canada [who will be selecting a final roster of de-signers whose work will travel to Venice]. We have been very fortunate to convince architecture firms to provide financial assistance through do-nations, although much more money still needs to be raised. The project essentially involves mi-gration, the accepting nature of our country, and how we can speak to this through architecture.

what will the future of canadian diversity look like? how can showcasing young designers’ work influenced by their cultur-

VANCOUVERNOV 3-27 2011MUSEUM OF VANCOUVERRC: Linus Lam

Jury:Omer ArbelPeter CardewGermaine Koh Chris MacDonaldLeslie van Duzer

CALGARYDEC 7-17 2011ALBERTA COLLEGE OF ART + DESIGNRC: Kate Thompson

Jury:Marc BoutinCatherine HamelShafraaz KabaMatthew NorthKatherine Wagner

SASKATOONJAN 19-FEB 11 2012MENDEL ART GALLERYRC: Daniel Reeves

Jury:Jim SiemensJeanna SouthDouglas Tastad

WINNIPEGFEB 2-29 2012THE FORKSRC: MLO

Jury:Étienne Gaboury Wanda KoopDavid PennerKaren ShanskiRalph Stern

TORONTOFEB 6-24 2012BROOKFIELD PLACERC: Darcie Watson

Jury:An Te LiuMichael MoxamChris Pommer Brigitte Shim Lisa Rochon

MONTREALJAN 18-FEB 24 2012PARISIAN LAUNDRYRC: Katrine Rivard + Karolina Jazterbezka

Jury:Michael Jemtrud Marie-Josée LacroixAnnie LebelRémi MorencyPierre Thibault

HALIFAXJAN 9-27 2012DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITYRC: Brian Lilley

Jury:Susan FitzgeraldOmar GandhiBarbara LounderRobert Mellin

VENICE ITALYAUG - NOV 2012VENICE BIENNALE

NATIONAL FINALMAR 15-APR 29 2012WINNIPEG ART GALLERY

Regional Entries selected for Venice

Jury:Eleanor BondIan ChodikoffAnne CormierBruce KuwabaraJohn Patkau

MIGRATING LANDSCAPES NATIONAL COMPETITION J U R Y + E X H I B I T I O N S C H E D U L E

RC : Regional Coordinator

38 canadian architect 11/11

al backgrounds enhance the future of can-adian architecture?

Sr We are definitely searching for a pattern. One of the important distinctions to make is that if we were doing this kind of project in Germany or Finland, it would be more about representing the national pride of those countries, whereas in Canada, the pattern is more about representing a national modesty or acceptance of others.

What has been your reaction when dis-cussing your project with the older genera-tion of architects?

Sr All but one or two that we have contacted thus far were immediately interested in our project. Engaging the architects has proven to be a posi-tive experience. The project has certainly become a collection of stories, and our job is to curate it into a series of coherent statements. The most compelling example was when we met with Bruce Kuwabara, who spoke of his experiences at previ-ous Venice Biennales. He encouraged us to ques-tion, to not be afraid, and to expose ideas.

Jh The process of including the whole [design] community has helped shape the project, which has become richer through a series of conversa-tions. This process has also helped expand our ideas about what the project should be.

is the project about architecture, or is it about culture? if it is about architecture, shouldn’t we be encouraging architects to assert their cultural backgrounds which can then shape their designs? if it is about

culture, then how can definitions of com-munity vary from one architect to another?

Sr At a recent Pecha Kucha night in Winnipeg, Johanna chose not to speak about our own archi-tecture, but about the concept of the “yard” and what the definition means in Europe versus Canada. In Europe, the yard is shared by the resi-dents of a number of buildings while in Canada, the only shared community space seems to be the parking lot. Each of our projects contains an ele-ment of public space, and this has certainly in-fluenced the design of our projects—the idea of the shared space has affected the ways in which we develop our own approach to design.

Many of us effectively continue to migrate–we might work in Barcelona one week, then Shanghai the next. how can we respond to these different cultures and practice responsibly without abandoning our cultural backgrounds?

Jh This is the kind of global issue that we want to tackle in our project. Having been educated in Manitoba and then returning to Finland for a school term, I realized that I was already Canad-ianized as far as my approach to architecture was concerned. The way in which we think about architecture in Canada is very different from the Finnish mentality. The Finnish architecture pro-fession thinks intuitively about form and there are many unwritten rules about pursuing a much more open-ended architecture.

What about issues of architectural educa-tion in canada today? in what ways can

architectural education improve for the next generation of architectural designers who come from diverse backgrounds?

Sr The best education is achieved through learn-ing from each other, as opposed to education that is served to you. Rick Haldenby [Director of the School of Architecture at the University of Water-loo] told us that he has noticed a tremendous change in students’ ethnic backgrounds, where today’s architecture schools are 80% comprised of visible minorities. Maybe we can work harder on trying to get the best out of our global student population while becoming more accepting and immersive so that students don’t have to be en-trenched in Western civilization.

Jh At the same time, we have to prepare our stu-dents for the practical world with practical know-ledge while teaching them to be fearless about innovation and experimentation. Practically speaking, this is difficult because it takes so long to get on your feet in this profession. By the time you feel confident, you have already been con-verted, so you must never forget that there are new ways to practice and achieve your ideas in the world.

clearly, the fundraising effort for Migrating Landscapes is not about promoting your firm, but it is about promoting a sense of collegiality and innovation in the profes-sion.

Jh This is our message. If everyone can share ideas, we all benefit. I grew up in an environment where I was taught to believe that our profession is about guarding your own ideas, yet I later dis-covered this isn’t true. As long as you open up and welcome an inclusive project, you will bene-fit tenfold.

Sr For some established architecture firms in Canada, to donate money to this project is sig-nificant for no other reason than to stimulate ideas, proving that there is a collegial spirit in this country. The discussion is always about a project, and it is always about a personal story. This is exactly what we wanted–to remove our-selves from the equation. How we get there will certainly help us gain a better idea and under-standing of our diverse Canadian identity. ca

For more information on Migrating Landscapes, or to support Canada’s official entry for the 2010 Venice Biennale in Architecture, please visit www.migratinglandscapes.ca.

LeFt The exhibiTion schedule leading up To nexT year’s opening in Venice.

www.hgcengineering.com

Noise, Vibrationand AcousticsConsulting Engineers• Architectural Acoustics• Building Noise and

Vibration Control

HOWE GASTMEIER CHAPNIK LIMITED

Mississauga, Ontario

P: 905-826-4044F: 905-826-4940

Turn roof tops intobeautiful & usefuldecks with the

Envirospec IncorporatedPhone (905) 271-3441Fax (905) 271-7552

Paver Pedestal System

Visit us atwww.envirospecinc.com

Designed &

Manufacture

d

in Canada

Southlake Regional Health Centre W.S. Tyler Canada’s MULTI-BARRETTE 8301 and 8124 woven wire mesh clads three elevations of the parking structure at the Southlake Regional Health Centre in Newmarket, Ontario. The mesh allows harmful emissions to escape naturally, while at the same time makes parked cars less visible from the road. To establish a unique optical connection between the pedes-trian bridge and the parking garage, the MULTI-BARRETTE 8301 mesh forms the edge of the bridge canopy. Visit www.weavingideas.net to learn more.

SOPRASEAL XPRESS GSOPRASEAL XPRESS G is an air/ vapour barrier for walls that is factory-laminated to an exterior-grade gypsum board. Light and easy to cut, it can be quickly installed using fewer steps than other products. The anchoring installation diagram printed on each board speeds up installation even more. Visit www.soprema.ca for more infor-mation.

MAPEI™ Mortars Deliver What You NeedDeciding which mortar to use is based on a number of things, including tile size, type of jobsite conditions and application. MAPEI’s complete family of Ultraflex mortars answer any needs you may have, including solutions for rapid-setting requirements and large-format tile. For details on all the Ultra­flex mortars, visit us at www.mapei.com.

nora on the go Mobile Apps Offer Versatility and Conveniencenora systems, Inc., manufacturer of commercial rubber flooring, introduces new nora on the go mobile apps for iPad® and iPhone® to join their existing BlackBerry® app. You can use nora’s mobile apps to explore flooring instal-lations, review product information and order samples, wherever your work takes you. The free apps are available through iTunes and BlackBerry App World. Please visit www.nora.com/us/apps26 for more information.

Easi-Lite™ Lightweight Gypsum Board Makes Installation and Handling Easier Up to 30 percent lighter than standard gypsum boards, Easi-Lite can be used for both interior ceilings and walls in residential and commercial applica-tions. The lightweight design makes the wallboard easier to transport, stock on the jobsite and install, reducing muscle strain and fatigue. Easi-Lite features a uniform high-strength, sag-resistant gypsum core, achieving the same high performance standards of a traditional gypsum board. CertainTeed Corp. 800-233-8990 www.certainteed.com

PCLGraphicsLtd.Th e Pa r t n e r Yo u Wa n t

PCL GraphicsCustom Print Fabricator Specializing in Environmental GraphicsProduction and Installation services

www.pclgraphics.com

The Partner you Want

1 800 268 7744

Magazine ads press 4X2.375.pdf 2 11-10-13 4:03 PM

11/11­­CANADIAN ARCHItECt­39

PRODuCt SHOWCASE PROfESSIONAL DIRECtORY

ACO Drain for Emergency facilitiesEmergency facilities need to be ready for action 24 hours a day! ACO Drain trench drain systems are used in hundreds of such facilities across Canada to help keep the buildings and equipment in the best possible shape and ready for intervention.Call us today to discuss your project!(877)226-4255www.acocan.ca

Murox® High Performance BuildingsMurox® invites you to discover a high performance building system that is the most efficient design-build solution on the market today for the construction of commercial, industrial and institutional structures. Unique advantages: –A fast-track construction solution – An integrated, energy-optimized solution – A profitable and environmentally- responsible business solution

Contact our architectural solutions ex-perts at 1-877-499-6049. www.canam.ws/murox

Accumet Composite Wall PanelsFlynn Canada’s Accumet modular wall cladding system uses state-of-the-art aluminum composite material and con-cealed framing to create an extremely strong, flat surface that eliminates dimp ling, buckling, and oil-canning. Accumet’s pressure-equalized rain-screen design with dry vented joints controls moisture drainage. Fabricated with corrosion-resistant materials, Accumet looks attractive — with mini-mal maintenance — for years to come. Visit www.flynn.ca

PERMACONNoble Architectural SeriesMODERN – VERSAtILE – DuRABLE – LEED BENEfItSFor more than 20 years, Noble Architectural Series has acquired a strong reputation for its high quality and durability. Select among the various choices to achieve endless design alternatives. Our product offers various colour options, finishes and dimensions. As an added advantage, Noble Architectural Series offers LEED benefits.PERMACONPRO.CA

VELuX introduces the Next Generation of Skylights!VELUX introduces the No Leak Sky-light™: • Simplified installation with our patented deck seal • Assured water tightness with 3 layers of pro tection • Enhanced aesthetics with a sleeker lower frame and new exterior grey colour • “Pick­&­Click” brackets for quick and easy blind installation • Smart home radio frequency remote controls • Energy efficiency with the latest LoE3 glazing • Warranty — 20 years on seal failure and 10 years on parts and labour.

Hambro® D500: A smart structural floor solution When evaluating your next multi-unit residential or commercial construction project, factor in the many benefits of Hambro’s proven structural floor system that offers: an economical and efficient solution, longer spans, con struc tion flexibility, high fire resistance, and outstanding acoustical properties. Hambro’s system fits perfectly with a variety of wall types: masonry, steel frame, metal stud, pre-cast walls, ICF blocks and wood walls. Contact us to see how. 1-800-871-8876 www.hambro.ws/architects

PRODuCt SHOWCASE

40­CANADIAN ARCHItECt­11/11

11/11­­canadian architect­41

calendar

For­more­inFormation­about­these,­and­additional­list-ings­oF­Canadian­and­inter-national­events,­please­visitwww.canadianarchitect.com

Modernism in Miniature: Points of ViewSeptember 22, 2011-January 8, 2012 This exhibition at the Canadian Centre for Architecture explores the encounter between photography and architectural model-making between 1920-1960, focusing on model photography as a distinctive genre. Comprising nearly 50 objects from the CCA collection, the show includes photographs of work by Mies van der Rohe, Le Corbusier, Carlo Mollino, J.J.P. Oud, Oscar Niemeyer and László Moholy-Nagy.www.cca.qc.ca

John Fulker: Images of ArchitectureNovember 16, 2011-January 14, 2012 Taking place at the West Vancouver Museum, this exhibition showcases John Fulker’s compelling architec-tural photographs, which first ap-peared in publications featuring modern design in the early 1960s. In North America, a burgeoning postwar building boom saw a flour-

ishing period of innovative Mod-ernist architecture, particularly on the West Coast, and demand for photographers grew alongside it. http://westvancouvermuseum.ca

didier Faustino lectureNovember 21, 2011 Paris-based ar-chitect Didier Faustino lectures at 6:00pm at the National Gallery in Ottawa.www1.carleton.ca/architecture/forum-lecture-series-2

Unbuilt toronto 2: More of the city that Might have BeenNovember 23, 2011 Mark Osbaldeston delivers an illustrated lecture at 7:00pm at the Royal Ontario Mu-seum in Toronto, based on his newly published book, a sequel to Unbuilt Toronto, which continues to explore never-realized building projects in and around Toronto from the city’s founding to the 21st century.

Peter Maccallum lectureNovember 24, 2011 Award-winning

Toronto documentary photographer Peter MacCallum lectures at 6:30pm at the Ryerson University Depart-ment of Architectural Science in Toronto.

construct canada 2011November 30-December 2, 2011 Con-struct Canada is the country’s largest annual building design and construction show, and is held at the Metro Toronto Convention Centre. Attendees can expect a var-iety of exhibits, seminars, technical demonstrations and networking opportunities, including a strong lineup of 450 speakers along with the International Architectural Round table.www.constructcanada.com richard t.t. Forman lectureDecember 1, 2011 Richard T.T. For-man of the Graduate School of De-sign at Harvard University delivers this lecture at 7:00pm at the Uni ver-sity of Calgary’s downtown campus.www.ucalgary.ca/evds

toronto: Built and UnbuiltDecember 12, 2011 This panel dis cus-sion takes place at 7:30pm at Fort York in Toronto, and features auth-or, critic and journalist John Bent-ley Mays; lawyer Mark Os bal des ton, author of Unbuilt Toronto and Unbuilt Toronto 2; and architect Phil Good-fellow, co-author of A Guidebook to Contemporary Architecture in Toronto. www.openbooktoronto.com/events/parler_fort_series_2

Michael Sorkin lectureJanuary 5, 2012 Michael Sorkin of CUNY & Michael Sorkin Studio in New York delivers the William Lyon Somerville Visiting Lecture-ship at 7:00pm at the University of Calgary’s downtown campus.www.ucalgary.ca/evds

Name Title

Company

Address

City Prov. Postalcode

Tel. Fax

E-mail

Signature Date

OCheque(payabletoCanadian Architect)OVisaOAMEXOMCNo Exp.date

Nameoncard

ww

w.c

anad

iana

rchi

tect

.com

80 Valleybrook Dr, Toronto, ON M3B 2S9

Pleasemailorfaxyourorderto416-510-6875

Subscribe/Renew Today!

To order on-line go to www.canadianarchitect.com Inquiries at circulation@canadianarchitect.com

OYes!Iwouldliketosubscribe/renewtoCanadian Architect

O1year $53.95 (+GST/HST/QST) O1yearU.S.$103.95 (US funds)O2years $85.95 (+GST/HST/QST) O1yearInternational$123.95 (US funds)

Type of business:

ORegisteredArchitect OProfessionalEngineersOInteriorDesigner OStudentofArchitecture/DesignOSpecificationWriter OLandscapeArchitectODeveloper/Builder OArchitecturalTechnologistOGraduate/Intern/Arch/ArchAsstOOther(pleasespecify)______________________________

42 canadian architect 11/11

Backpage

Sculpting conventionS

Artists DAniel Young AnD ChristiAn giroux, winners of the 2011 sobeY Art AwArD, hAve muCh to offer ArChiteCts with their unique perspeCtives on the CitY, urbAn spACes, AnD builDing sYstems.

teXt brenDAn Cormierphoto CherYl o’brien

In October, sculptors Daniel Young and Christian Giroux were awarded the Sobey Art Award—Can-ada’s pre-eminent award for contemporary Cana dian art. While sculpture remains the foun-dation of their discipline, the duo’s recent work has explored issues relevant to architectural practice—issues relating to mass production, modular fabrication, urban development, and digital modelling.

For example, Reticulated Gambol is an inter-active pavilion structure for Lee Centre Park in Scarborough, which comments on the serial production of outdoor play objects. The piece consists of a reconfiguration of standard play-ground equipment into a grid formation. The new configuration and singular blue colour em-phasizes both the modularity and repetition of

aBove Reticulated Gambol, An interACtive pAvilion struCture for lee Centre pArk in sCArborough, ontArio, Comments on the seriAl proDuCtion of outDoor plAY objeCts.

parts—recalling the mass-produced nature of play equipment in the city. The grid configura-tion also suggests the idea of a system that can be continually expanded, echoing early Modernist manifestos such as Le Corbusier’s Ville Radieuse, but also the “city frameworks” by radical archi-tects of the ’60s, such as Constant Nieuwenhuys’s New Babylon. Aside from this, the so-called pavil-ion remains a successful and well-used play-ground, demonstrating how a sculptural inter-vention can act as a commentary on an object as well as a functional object in and of itself.

Every Building, or Site, that a Building Permit was issued for a New Building in Toronto in 2006, is a 35-mm film work that does exactly what its title suggests. The 13-minute film loop cycles through every building and site in the city where a build-ing permit was issued. The austerity of the meth-ods—a single tripod-mounted shot that lasts eight seconds before the next building or site is fea-tured—has a profound effect on the viewer. One is able to slowly pick up on recurring themes and patterns in the new buildings being projected. Not only does one get a succinct overview of what was built in that year, but also a clear image of the

building conventions, mass-produced materials, and aesthetic trends wrapped up in these build-ings, which ultimately contribute to the look and feel of the city.

The relationship between architecture and sculpture has a long and rich history. However, while the two professions have traditionally traded notes on formal aesthetics, Young and Giroux’s work points to an exchange founded on the processes and conventions behind the archi-tecture itself. While Young and Giroux have clearly drawn inspiration from modern building practices to produce their artwork, it is not rid ic-ulous to suggest that architects could equally draw inspiration from Young and Giroux. ca

Brendan Cormier is a writer and co-founder of the Toronto-based urban design/research collective Department of Unusual Certainties.

PPG Industries, Inc., Glass Business & Discovery Center, 400 Guys Run Road, Pittsburgh, PA 15024 www.ppgideascapes.com

New Solarban® R100 solar control, low-e glass. A better glass for a better environment.

Clean lines. Clean look. Clean conscience. It’s a lot to expect from an ordinary piece of glass. Then again, Solarban® R100 solar control, low-e glass is about as far from ordinary as you get – thanks to a Solar Heat Gain Coefficient of .23 and a neutral-reflective appearance that lets your building put its best face forward. And you’ll really be surprised by the extraordinary energy savings you can expect with Solarban R100 glass. To get your copy of the white paper, go to ppgideascapes.com/SBr100.

Solarban, IdeaScapes, PPG and the PPG logo are trademarks owned by PPG Industries Ohio, Inc. | Cradle to Cradle CertifiedCM is a certification mark of MBDC.

5404-6_PPG-TreeHugger-Single_CanadianArch.indd 1 4/7/11 10:53 AM

w w w . p r o d e m a . c o mMany more examples at :

Request a catalogue at: w w w . p r o d e m a . c o m / r e q u e s t / c a n a d a

Prodema Head Office and Plant

Bº. San Miguel, s/n • 20250 Legorreta - Gipuzkoa (SPAIN) • T.: (+34) 943 80 70 00 • F.: (+34) 943 80 71 30 • E.: prodema@prodema.com

• Leaders in Wood Composites for 100+ Years

• PEFC Certified (Chain of Custody Forest Certification)

• ISO 14001 Environmental Management System

• LEED Qualifier

• Promotes Healthy Buildings

• Maintenance-Free

Sustainable Architectureat a Stunning Price

A Commitment to Forest Sustainability.

Prodema Canada

SOUNDS SOLUTIONS 6817 Steeles Ave. West Toronto, Ontario M9V 4R9 • T.: 800 667 2776 • E.: mail@soundsolutions.ca