Upload
matthew-ray
View
214
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Terry Surles, DirectorTerry Surles, Director
Technology Systems DivisionTechnology Systems Division
California Energy CommissionCalifornia Energy Commission
November 6, 2001November 6, 2001
Industry Growth ForumIndustry Growth ForumConnecting to the Market:Connecting to the Market:
Navigating the Valley of DeathNavigating the Valley of Death
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
California Must be Prepared to Face the Same Issues as Others Must
Economics Resource Competition New technology market
penetration
Environment Climate change Life cycle analysis
Security Oil, Nuclear materials
Energy Costs Fundamentally Affect our Overall Economy
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
A
g
l]
l
l’
l’
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Coal16%
Large Hydro19%
Nuclear17%
Natural Gas36%
Eligible Renewable
12%
2000 Net Power System
Eligible Renewables
Biomass & Waste- 2.0
Geothermal - 4.6
Small Hydro - 3.0
Solar - 0.4
Wind - 2.0
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Per-capita electricity consumption, 1960–2000
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
Rest of U.S.
California
(DOE and CEC data, compiled 1960–89 by Worldw atch Institute, 1990–2000 by Rocky Mountain Institute; 2000 data are preliminary; 1991–2000 population data not yet renormalized to 2000 Census findings)
California: policy really does workM
Wh
per
pers
on-y
ear
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
43,509 MW
Contribution to ISO Peak DemandAugust 16, 2001 (MW)
Commercial AC
Commercial Lighting
Residential AC
Other
MW
60005000
6000
26,509
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Any R&D Program Must Consider
Near-term realities political attributes: affordable, reliable, safe
Longer-term vision resource competition future regulatory/environmental issues
For both limited budget uncertainties associated with life-cycle costs and
competing technologies and lifestyles
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Carbon Management:An Approach for Integrated Energy Systems R&D
Carbon Management
Efficiency< Btu/GDP
Decarbonization CO2
Btu
SequestrationCO2 atm
CO2 produced
<
<
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Vision Statement
The future electrical system of California will provide a clean, abundant and affordable supply
tailored to the needs of “smart”, efficient customers and will be the best in the nation.
Tailored, clean, abundant, affordable supply
Smart, efficient customers
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
PIER Mission Statement Priorities
California’s Energy Future
Economy:Affordable Solutions
Quality:Reliable and
AvailableEnvironment:Protect and
Enhance
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Attributes for Addressing State Issues
Program Integration
Balanced Technology Portfolio-Temporal-Technology-Risk
TechnologyPartnerships- Universities- Industry- Federal
Focus onCalifornia- Specific to State needs
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Technology Development Continuum - Innovation to Market
PIER Program (CEC)Renewables Prog. (CEC)
DG & Energy Efficiency Prog(CPUC)
CA Mun. Utility Programs
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Investment
Consumer Education Account
$5.4 million (1%)
Existing Account$243 million (45%)
New Account$162 million
(30%)
Emerging Account$54 million (10%)
Customer Credit Account
$75.6 million (14%)
• Existing, New and Emerging Renewables
• Emerging Renewables Buydown Program
• Export Program
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
EXPORTING ENERGY TECHNOLOGY
Data from export brochure; Export Program
• The World Bank estimates that over $30 trillion in investments are required for power generation projects over the next 20 years to meet global electricity demand.
• Developing and industrializing nations throughout the world are improving their electricity resources by investing in and developing new and efficient energy technologies.
• The California energy industry is viewed as a model for technology innovation and implementation.
• Since 1988, $400 million in energy export sales has resulted from the program’s assistance to California companies.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Lighting Advances: The Berkeley Lamp
Increased lighting quality Energy savings- 30-50% Low glare - computer Unique control features Up or down lighting Lots of light 450 W worth of
incandescent and halogen lighting for 150 W
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
PowerLight• PowerLight achieved a 57% reduction in manufacturing costs of the PowerGuard and opened an 18,000 ft2 automated tile manufacturing facility in Berkeley
•PowerLight is the U.S. leader in BIPV with PowerGuard
• 2/29/00 - PowerLight installed the largest roof-integrated, thin-film solar electric system in North America a 10,000 ft2 installation at the Port of Cape Charles, Virginia
• The PowerGuard system are joined by a tongue-and-groove design that requires no roof penetration or adhesive, thus eliminating leakage and related maintenance
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
PowerLight Corporation Building-Integrated PV Roof System
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
The Wind Turbine Company
Design, develop and demonstrate a utility-scale wind turbine
Horizontal axis, two-blade, downwind design
Prototype developed for PIER and tested at NREL rated at 250 kW
Commercial prototype demonstration sited at the Fairmont Reservoir in LADWP territory for a 500 kW - scaled up to 750 kW - wind turbine demonstration to begin in October 2001
Goal is to produce electricity $0.035 cents per kWh per 100 unit wind farms with wind resources 15 mph.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Alzeta Gas Turbine Semi-Radiant Burner (GTSB)
• PIER is helping develop low- or no- emission electric production methods, including gas turbines for use in DG
•Alzeta’s GTSB combustors successfully demonstrated simultaneous readings 2 ppm emissions of NOx, CO and unburned hydrocarbon on gaseous fuels during prototype testing.
• Goal is to lower cost of emission reduction by $100/kW for smaller facilities
•Alzeta has paid $24,464 to date in royalty repayment to the PIER Program based on direct sales and licensing of the product
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Catalytica Energy SystemsXonon Catalytic Combustion
Ultra-low NOx < 3 ppm provides pollution prevention vs. exhaust cleanup
Addresses forecast that 90% of proposed new capacity in U.S. by 2020 (390 GW) will be gas fired
Commercialization agreement with Kawasaki (>50% of small turbine market) currently offering Xonon-equipped 1.4 MW turbine
Commercial Xenon modules shipped 3Q 2001; 4Q 2001 VA hospital installation
GE (50% of world turbine market) launch order for up to six Xonon-equipped 10 MW turbines
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Kalina Cycle Canoga Park Facility
• Kalina Cycle uses working fluid of 70% ammonia and 30% water
• Ammonia has much lower boiling point than water and spins the steam turbine at lower temperatures
• 3.2 MW plant at Canoga Park, CA
• GE has purchased exclusive license to use Kalina in their combined-cycle gas turbine systems worldwide
• $505,000 royalties received from Exergy, Inc.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Real Time Transmission Line Monitoring/Rating• tension monitoring
increases transmission capabilities by 15-30%
• highly accurate - measures line sagging to within 1-3 inches
• increased safety - provides the actual real time rating and provides alarms of impending clearance violations
• system 1-3 were built for utilities in Virginia, Colorado and Finland
• 200th system was sold on 8/4/00. The systems are in use on five continents by 70 utilities.
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
High Performance Fume Hood
• reduces airflow and energy requirements by 30-50%
• flow reduction from each hood cuts energy costs by $1000/yr
• maintains or enhances worker safety
• ASHRAE standard test achieved containment with 70% flow reduction
• with 30,000 hoods in state, the new Hood could save about 360 million kWh/yr, totaling nearly $30 million
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
California Energy Commission Thoughts on Market Connectedness
R&D, with the wrong set of attributes, will fail on a commercial basis
Attributes must include factors for successfully reaching the marketplace
Even technologically mature products need governmental support due to market failures
environmental externalities of fossil fuel-based energy technologies are not reflected in the market price
unbalanced distribution of energy subsidies
CEC supports existing, new and emerging renewables through production incentives, capital cost buydowns, and rebates to customers
Venture capital can catalyze movement into marketplace
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Conclusion: Still an Open Question as to Our Success
Need near-term successes to establish variability of program
Must establish substantive collaborations with other funding agencies
Must establish long-term relationships with successful performers
Better linkage between existing state programs is mandatory
Interaction with venture capital community critical to our future success
CALIFORNIA ENERGY COMMISSION
Will California Lead Change?
OLD Electricity by nuclear,
gas, coal-by-wire, hydroelectric
No choice to consumers - tax mentality
Laissez-faire
NEW Base load central
stations with reliance on distributed generation - “Community systems”
Choice of supplier and technology
Government catalyzes true paradigm shift