Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
California Association for Institutional Research CAIR - Conference Fall 2019 Monterey, CA
Tools for Analyzing Instructional Costs Drivers in Academic Departments by
Differentiated Carnegie & Governance Groups
Tom Eleuterio, Higher Education Consortia Institutional Research & Effectiveness
Delaware Cost Study Data & Research
Two decade study, focused at the academic discipline level, of faculty instructional workload and costs, sponsored research and public service from over 700 four-year, public and private non-profit higher education institutions
“The National Study of Instructional Cost & Productivity”, conducted annually by the Higher Education Consortia at University of Delaware. Results reported here from a grant for public policy research by the Smith Richardson Foundation
Research collaboration with the Education Policy Initiative Dr. Kevin Stange, University of Michigan and Dr. Steven Hemelt University of North Carolina- Chapel Hill
Three Motivations to Use Delaware Cost Study Data
• Student View: College prices ↑ 36% between 2008 and 2018 (College Board, 2018) − Student and parents now pay for >50% of costs (Desrochers & Hurlburt, 2016) − Concerns about access, persistence, indebtedness and value as an investment
• Administrative View: Improved understanding of cost differences by field, trends, and cost drivers is key tool for tempering future cost growth via intentional management
• Policy View: Better understating of costs à fuller picture of effects of policies such as financial aid, free college, and incentives to major in specific fields Example: High cost of instructing engineering majors is an important social and monetary cost of increasing STEM majors; a factor that is often ignored in policies promoting the tying of funding to high-earning occupations (Altonji & Zimmerman, 2017)
Many discussions of the cost of higher education only focus on the cost of tuition, state financing or federal financial aid. Few examinations of the cost of instruction that include differences in the cost of instruction across a range of academic disciplines have informed the larger conversation.
Top Concerns for College Presidents
“Presidents overwhelmingly believe the public’s skepticism is based on misunderstandings about colleges’ wealth, how much they charge (and spend) and the overall purpose of higher education.”
Top three concerns for senior leadership are all related to finances: budget and financial management (68%), fundraising (47%), and enrollment management (38%).
Our Study Sample • Process of constructing weights honed our sample; Identified outliers,
missing data patterns
• We focus a subset of 20 disciplines in the study 2000-2015
Cross-section (2013 – 2105): 7,245 obs → 3,307 programs →256 institutions
− Panel (2000-2015): 32,496 obs → 6,443 program, → 486 institutions
• Supplemented by IPEDS, OK Salary Survey, other sources
• Focus on 20 programs (CIP4 codes) using English (CIP 23.0101) as a reference for the other 19.
Questions and Analyses
1) What are the differentiated cost differences measured by direct instructional expenses (DIE) across selected fields of study?
2) What drivers account for cost differences by field? Decompose level and trend differences into 4 candidate drivers:
(A) Personnel costs per FTE instructor (B) Non-personnel costs (C) Faculty workload (D)Class size
3) Simulate four cost drivers by substituting those for English as an index
Cost per Student Credit Hour Weighted to Control for Institutional Size & Governance
Our Cross-section Study Focus
• Selected largely based on size, coverage, policy relevance
10,054
18,001
26,572
2,436
4,763
1,528
1,913
4,371
1,485
Computer/Info Sciences 3,729 1,493
Economics 7,034
Education 6,790 9,360
Electrical Engineering 4,388 2,638
English 13,466
Fine and Studio Arts 7,479
History 10,030
Mathematics 4,917 1,423
Mechanical Engineering 6,562 1,672
Nursing
Philosophy 1,950
Physics 1,560
Political Science 12,022
Psychology
Sociology 9,943
911
997
Avg. number of degrees produced each year during 2012 to 2015
Accounting 12,144
Biology 17,904
Business 20,980
Chemistry 4,577
Communication 17,565
DegreeType Doctors Masters Bachelors
0K 2K 4K 6K 8K 10K 12K 14K 16K 18K 20K 22K 24K 26K 28K 30K 32K
Avg. Number of Degrees by Type
Average of Number of Degrees by Type for each Cip4. Color shows details about DegreeType. The marks are labeled by average of Number of Degrees by Type. The view is filtered on DegreeType and Cip4. The DegreeType filter has multiple members selected. The Cip4 filter has multiple members selected.
Snapshot 2013 -2015: Cost Differences by Field
0.74
0.630.60
0.310.26
0.23 0.21 0.200.16
0.110.07
0.00
-0.02-0.05
-0.09 -0.11-0.18 -0.18
-0.22-0.25
-.4-.2
0.2
.4.6
.8%
diff fr
om En
glish
Electrical Engineering
Nursing
Mechanical Engineering
Education
Fine/Studio Arts
Biz Admin/Mgmt/Operations
Computer/Info Scie
nces
AccountingPhysics
ChemistryBiology
English
Poli Sci/G
overnment
EconomicsHisto
ry
Comm/Media Studies
Psychology
Sociology
Philosophy
Mathematics
Similar Stories Emerge …
-.50
.51
-.50
.51
-.50
.51
-.50
.51
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5
Accounting Biology Biz Admin/Mgmt/Operations Chemistry Comm/Media Studies
Computer/Info Sciences Economics Education Electrical Engineering Fine/Studio Arts
History Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Nursing Philosophy
Physics Poli Sci/Government Psychology Sociology
% d
iff re
lativ
e to
Eng
lish
1: Actual difference; 2: Equate other exp; 3: Equate salary; 4: Equate workload; 5: Equate class size
Trends in Faculty Mix
0.2
.4.6
.80
.2.4
.6.8
0.2
.4.6
.80
.2.4
.6.8
2000 2005 2010 2015 2000 2005 2010 2015 2000 2005 2010 2015 2000 2005 2010 2015 2000 2005 2010 2015
Accounting Biology Biz Admin/Mgmt/Operations Chemistry Comm/Media Studies
Computer/Info Sciences Economics Education Electrical Engineering English
Fine/Studio Arts History Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Nursing
Philosophy Physics Poli Sci/Government Psychology Sociology
Tenure/TT Other Supplemental
Teaching assistants
% F
acul
ty s
hare
Year
Weighted by SCH*IPW
Impact on Public Opinion and Policy
https://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-it-costs-colleges-far-more-to-educate-a-physicist-or-teacher-than-an-english-major-2019-02-13?mod=jillian-berman
2000 - 2015
Cost per student credit hour summarizes four basic cost drivers related to instruction
Workload based on fall semester teaching activity excluding lab sections
Class size is the ratio of fall semester student credit hours divided by three per class section
Salaries are expressed in 2015 dollars using CPI-U
Other than personnel expenses in support of instruction generally range between 3% and 10% of the total direct
instructional expenditures
Snapshot 2013 -2015: Cost Differences by Field
0.74
0.630.60
0.310.26
0.23 0.21 0.200.16
0.110.07
0.00
-0.02-0.05
-0.09 -0.11-0.18 -0.18
-0.22-0.25
-.4-.2
0.2
.4.6
.8%
diff fr
om En
glish
Electrical Engineering
Nursing
Mechanical Engineering
Education
Fine/Studio Arts
Biz Admin/Mgmt/Operations
Computer/Info Scie
nces
AccountingPhysics
ChemistryBiology
English
Poli Sci/G
overnment
EconomicsHisto
ry
Comm/Media Studies
Psychology
Sociology
Philosophy
Mathematics
Snapshot 2013 -2015: Cost Differences by Carnegie Class and Institutional Governance
-.4-.2
0.2
.4.6
.81
% dif
f from
Englis
h
Electrical Engineering
Nursing
Mechanical Engineering
Education
Fine/Studio Arts
Accounting
Chemistry
Biz Admin/Mgmt/Operations
PhysicsBiology
Computer/Info Scie
nces
Poli Sci/G
overnment
Economics
Sociology
Comm/Media StudiesEnglish
History
Mathematics
Psychology
Philosophy
Pri research Pri comprehensive Pri bacc
Pub research Pub comprehensive Pub bacc
Differentiated Cost Differences by Carnegie Class and Institutional Governance Magnifies Percentage Gaps ( 2013 – 2015)
Privately Governed Research Institutions Have Largest Differences in High Cost Disciplines
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80
100
Percentage Different from English by Carnegie and Governance
Private Research Public Research
Publicly Governed Comprehensive Institutions Have Largest Differences in High Cost Disciplines
-40
-20
0
20
40
60
80Percentage in Cost For English for Comprehensive Institutions
Private Comprehensive Public Comprehensive
How does the cost driver analysis differ for undergraduate focused institutions?
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Instructional Cost Percentage Different from English Sorted by Carnegie Baccalaureate Groups
Private bacc Public Bacc
Seven disciplines have costs above English for both publicly and privately governed institutions
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Nursing Physics Education Fine/Studio Arts Biology Computer/Info Sciences Chemistry
Instructional Cost Percentage Different from English Sorted by Carnegie Baccalaureate Groups
Private bacc Public Bacc
Five disciplines show higher costs than English in publicly controlled institutions with the opposite in privately controlled
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Poli Sci/Government Biz. Admin/Mgmt/Operations Economics Accounting Comm/Media Solutions
Instructional Cost Percentage Different from English Sorted by Carnegie Baccalaureate Groups
Private bacc Public Bacc
Five disciplines are less expensive than English for both privately and publicly governed institutions
History Mathematics Philososphy Sociology PsychologyPrivate bacc -16 -20 -30 -30 -36Public Bacc -17 -22 -5 -28 -17
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Private bacc Public Bacc
4 ratios help to determine if an academic department has adequate resources
• How does class size measure as student credit hours per FTE instructor compare with similar programs?
• How does workload for regular instructional faculty compare with departmental peer benchmarks?
• What percent of instructional costs are for non-personnel expenses compared to discipline-focused averages?
• What level of compensation ( salaries and benefits) is provided as reflected in cost per student credit hour?
1) USE ENGLISH AS AN INDEX BY FIRST COMPUTING THE COST PER STUDENT CREDIT HOUR (SCH) IN THE TARGET DISCIPLINE AS A PERCENTAGE OF THE COST PER SCH FOR ENGLISH AT THE SAME INSTITUTION. 2) COMPUTE A SIMILAR INDEXED PERCENT FOR THE SPECIFIC TARGET DEPARTMENT OTHER THAN ENGLISH USING THE COST PER STUDENT CREDIT HOUR WITH THE AVERAGE FOR ENGLISH IN THE CARNEGIE AND GOVERNANCE GROUP. 3) COMPUTE THE DIFFERENCE OF THE INDEXED PERCENTAGES FOR A THE TARGET DEPARTMENT AND ENGLISH TO OBTAIN THE STANDARDIZED PERCENT ABOVE OR BELOW THE COST PER SCH TO TEACH ENGLISH.
Identify cost differences with respect to English then examine how the four cost drivers contribute to the total
Case Study: When English is set equal to ( within 1%) in cost to the average for small BAS, privately governed institutions. Art is 161% more expensive per SCH than English at the at other small privately governed institutions. The four cost drivers will reveal why.
Our case study art department pays salaries and benefits that are 14%
higher than the Carnegie & governance group average
The art department spends 5% more on instructional materials and other non-personnel items than similar departments
The art department teaches almost 30% fewer class sections than art departments in the same Carnegie and governance group; this is approximately one fewer class per FTE instructional faculty member
The art department teaches a small percent more student credit hours per faculty than the group
Use the web portal to benchmark with three-year averages
Table 3 standard cost study teaching ratio comparisons in the web portal provide complementary information
Three year averages in the web portal or peer group reporting provide context and comparisons
Class sections comparisons with a three year average
The number of class section for tenure / tenure track FTE is 0.74 sections smaller than the three year average
Table 4 Cost ratio three year averages in web portal reveal differences in cost per student credit hour and personnel % of DIE