Click here to load reader
Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Service Line: Rapid Response Service
Version: 1.0
Publication Date: November 3, 2017
Report Length: 12 Pages
CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS
Off-Label Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Dermatological Conditions: Clinical Effectiveness
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 2
Authors: Michelle Clark, Sarah Visintini
Cite As: Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions: Clinical Ef f ectiveness . Ottawa: CADTH; 2017 Nov . (CADTH rapid
response report: summary of abstracts).
Acknowledgments:
Disclaimer: The inf ormation in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care prof essionals, health sy stems leaders,
and policy -makers make well-inf ormed decisions and thereby improv e the quality of health care serv ices. While patients and others may access this document,
the document is made av ailable f or inf ormational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its f itness f or any particular
purpose. The inf ormation in this document should not be used as a substitute f or prof essional medical adv ice or as a substitute f or the application of cl inical
judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other prof essional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency f or Drugs and
Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any inf ormation, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or serv ic es.
While care has been taken to ensure that the inf ormation prepared by CADTH in this document is acc urate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date
the material was f irst published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that ef f ect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible f or the
quality , currency , propriety , accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing
this document. The v iews and opinions of third parties published in this document do not necessarily state or ref lect those of CADTH.
CADTH is not responsible f or any errors, omissions, injury , loss, or damage arising f rom or relating to the use (or misuse) of any inf ormation, statements, or
conclusions contained in or implied by the contents of this document or any of the source materials.
This document may contain links to third-party websites. CADTH does not hav e control ov er the content of such sites. Use of third-party sites is gov erned by
the third-party website owners’ own terms and conditions set out f or such sites. CADTH does not make any guarantee with respect to any inf ormation
contained on such third-party sites and CADTH is not responsible f or any injury , loss, or damage suf f ered as a result of using such third-party sites. CADTH
has no responsibility f or the collection, use, and disc losure of personal inf ormation by third-party sites.
Subject to the af orementioned limitations, the v iews expressed herein are those of CADTH and do not necessarily represent the v iews of Canada’s f ederal,
prov incial, or territorial gov ernments or any third party supplier of inf ormation.
This document is prepared and intended f or use in the context of the Canadian health care sy stem. The use of this document outside of Canada is done so at
the user’s own risk.
This disclaimer and any questions or matters of any nature arising f rom or relating to the content or use (or misuse) of this document will be gov erned by and
interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Prov ince of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein, and all proceedings shall be subject to the
exclusiv e jurisdiction of the courts of the Prov ince of Ontario, Canada.
The copy right and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian
Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document f or non-commercial purposes
only , prov ided it is not modif ied when reproduced and appropriate credit is giv en to CADTH and its licensors.
About CADTH: CADTH is an independent, not-f or-prof it organization responsible f or prov iding Canada’s health care decision-makers with objectiv e ev idence
to help make inf ormed decisions about the optimal use of drugs, medical dev ices, diagnostics, and procedures in our health care sy stem.
Funding: CADTH receiv es f unding f rom Canada’s f ederal, prov incial, and territorial gov ernments, with the exception of Quebec.
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 3
Research Question
What is the clinical effectiveness of the off-label use of intravenous or subcutaneous
immunoglobulin for the treatment of dermatological conditions?
Key Findings
Twenty-one systematic reviews and meta-analyses and five randomized controlled trials
were identified regarding the clinical effectiveness of the off-label use of intravenous or
subcutaneous immunoglobulin for the treatment of dermatological conditions.
Methods
A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including PubMed, The
Cochrane Library, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD)
databases, Canadian and major international health technology agencies, as well as a
focused Internet search. Methodological filters were applied to limit retrieval to health
technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomized controlled
trials. Where possible, retrieval was limited to the human population. The search was also
limited to English language documents published between January 1, 2009 and October
24, 2017. Internet links were provided, where available.
Selection Criteria
One reviewer screened citations and selected studies based on the inclusion criteria
presented in Table 1.
Table 1: Selection Criteria
Population Patients any age with dermatological conditions that are not approved indications for IVIG, including but not limited to:
Atopic dermatitis/eczema
Autoimmune bullous diseases
Dermatomyositis/Polymyositis
Pemphigus
Pyoderma gangrenosum
Stevens-Johnson syndrome
Systemic sclerosis/scleroderma
Toxic epidermal necrolysis
Urticaria
Intervention Human IVIG or SCIG products, including but not limited to those available in Canada, alone or in combination with corticosteroids or other immunomodulation therapies.
Comparator Treatment as usual, placebo, no treatment
Outcomes Clinical benefits and harms
Study Designs Health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 4
Results
Rapid Response reports are organized so that the higher quality evidence is presented first.
Therefore, health technology assessment reports, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses
are presented first. These are followed by randomized controlled trials.
Twenty-one systematic reviews and meta-analyses and five randomized controlled trials
were identified regarding the clinical effectiveness of the off-label use of intravenous or
subcutaneous immunoglobulin for the treatment of dermatological conditions. No relevant
health technology assessments were identified.
Additional references of potential interest are provided in the appendix.
Overall Summary of Findings
Twenty-one systematic reviews and meta-analyses1-21
and five randomized controlled
trials22-26
were identified regarding the clinical effectiveness of the off-label use of
intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin for the treatment of dermatological
conditions. The dermatological conditions that were studied included necrobiotic
xanthogranuloma,1 paraneoplastic dermatomyositis,
2 Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic
epidermal necrolysis,3,6,7,9,18,20,21
drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms,4
pemphigus,5,8,11,12,14,15,22,26
Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated mucocutaneous disease,10
dermatomyositis and polymyositis,13,17,19,24
Wegener's granulomatosis,16
skin sclerosis in
diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis,23
and moderate to severe childhood atopic
dermatitis.25
The results of the studies varied in reference to the effectiveness of
intravenous immunoglobulin for these conditions. Further details are provided in Table 2.
Table 2: Summary of Included Studies
First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’
Conclusions
Systematic Reviews
Miguel (2017)1 Necrobiotic
xanthogranuloma
Not specified in the
abstract
NR in the abstract High-dose IVIG was
specified as one
treatment option
identified in the review
but not results or
conclusions were
provided in the abstract.
Zerdes (2017)2 Paraneoplastic
dermatomyositis
Not specified in the
abstract
NR in the abstract IVIG may be a viable
alternative treatment for
cases resistant to
prednisone.
Zimmermann (2017)3 SJS/TEN Not specified in the
abstract
NR in the abstract There were no
beneficial findings
identified regarding the
use of IVIG for
SJS/TEN.
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 5
Table 2: Summary of Included Studies
First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’
Conclusions
Bommersbach (2016)4 DRESS Not specified in the
abstract
NR in the abstract IVIG may be a
promising management
option for DRESS.
Cholera (2016)5 Pemphigus vulgaris Not specified in the
abstract
NR in the abstract IVIG was reported in
the literature as a
treatment option for
patients who did not
respond to standard
treatment.
Huang (2016)6 TEN Not specified in the
abstract
Overall mortality =
24.2%
Overall mortality of
adults treated with
high-dose IVIG =
11.7%
The authors concluded
the evidence did not
support the use of IVIG,
including high-dose, for
the treatment of TEN.
Ye (2016)7 SJS/TEN Not specified in the
abstract
Corticosteroid IVIG
combination
significantly reduced
recovery time
compared with
corticosteroid alone
Beneficial effects
were greater for those
treated with high-dose
IVIG
IVIG use was
associated with a
decrease in mortality
The authors concluded
that the combination of
IVIG and corticosteroid
may reduce recovery
time for SJS/TEN.
Atzmony (2015)8 Pemphigus vulgaris and
pemphigus foliaceus
Not specified in the
abstract
Adjuvants, including
IVIG, were found to
decrease the risk of
relapse.
Different adjuvants
were pooled in the
analysis
The authors concluded
that adjuvant therapies,
including IVIG, may
have a role in treating
pemphigus.
Barron (2015)9 SJS/TEN Not specified in the
abstract
“Meta-regression
demonstrated a
strong inverse
correlation between
IVIG dosage and
SMRs.”
The authors concluded
that IVIG at doses ≥2
g/kg may significantly
reduce mortality in
these patients.
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 6
Table 2: Summary of Included Studies
First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’
Conclusions
SMRs did not differ
significantly between
studies
Canavan (2015)10
Mycoplasma
pneumoniae-associated
mucocutaneous
disease
All ages NR in the abstract IVIG was identified from
the literature as a
treatment option.
McMillan (2015)11
Pemphigus vulgaris Not specified in the
abstract
NR in the abstract IVIG was identified from
the literature as a
treatment option.
Taylor (2015)12
Mucous membrane
pemphigoid
Not specified in the
abstract
NR in the abstract The authors identified
IVIG as a promising
intervention for mucous
membrane pemphigoid.
Vermaak (2015)13
Dermatomyositis and
polymyositis
Not specified in the
abstract
NR in the abstract The authors concluded
that no specific
treatment could be
recommended based
on the results of the
review; however, IVIG
was identified as one
treatment with improved
outcomes.
Zhao (2015)14
Pemphigus vulgaris Not specified in the
abstract
NR in the abstract The authors concluded
that the available
evidence was
incomplete and
inconclusive. IVIG
appeared to be a
promising treatment but
requires further study
for confirmation.
Atzmony (2014)15
Pemphigus vulgaris and
pemphigus foliaceus
Not specified in the
abstract
IVIG had more
favourable short-term
efficacy versus placeb0
Further study is
required before
treatment
recommendations can
be made.
Fortin (2013)16
Wegener's
granulomatosis
Not specified in the
abstract
No significant difference
was reported in
mortality, serious
The authors concluded
there was not sufficient
evidence to recommend
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 7
Table 2: Summary of Included Studies
First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’
Conclusions
adverse events, time to
relapse, open-label
rescue therapy, and
infection rates between
IVIG and placebo as
adjuvant treatment.
IVIG as adjuvant
treatment.
Gordon (2012)17
Dermatomyositis and
polymyositis
Not specified in the
abstract
Significant improvement
was reported in muscle
strength scores over 3
months in the IVIG
group,
The authors concluded
that the review
highlighted the need for
RCTs to assess the
efficacy of treatments.
Huang (2012)18
TEN All ages Overall mortality of
patients treated with
IVIG = 19.9%
Treatment with high-
dose IVIG resulted in
significantly lower
mortality than low-
dose IVIG
Pediatric patients had
significantly lower
mortality than adults
The authors concluded
that the evidence did
not support the clinical
benefit of IVIG.
Wang (2012)19
Polymyositis or
dermatomyositis
Adult patients IVIG + corticosteroid
significantly improved
muscle strength and
decreased serum
creatine kinase versus
placebo
The authors concluded
that IVIG was an
effective and relatively
safe treatment for
patients with
polymyositis or
dermatomyositis
Del Pozzo-Magana
(2011)20
SJS/TEN Children IVIG + steroids
had similar results as
dressing and support
treatment alone
longer time to achieve
remission
associated with more
complications and
deaths
The authors concluded
that IVIG + steroids
improved outcomes but
the results were
variable between the
identified studies.
Roujeau (2011)21
SJS/TEN Not specified in the
abstract
Pooled mortality ratio =
0.82
The authors concluded
that neither
corticosteroids nor IVIG
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 8
Table 2: Summary of Included Studies
First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’
Conclusions
resulted in any
important reduction in
the risk of mortality.
Randomized Controlled Trials
Amagai (2017)22
Bullous pemphigoid Patients who failed
prednisolone
Age not specified in the
abstract
DAS15 was 12.5
points lower in the
IVIG group versus
placebo
The authors concluded
that IVIG was
therapeutically
beneficial for patients
with bullous pemphigoid
who were resistant to
steroids.
Takehara (2013)23
Skin sclerosis in diffuse
cutaneous systemic
sclerosis
Not specified in the
abstract
There was no
significant difference
observed in MRSS
between IVIG and
placebo groups
The authors indicated
that the primary
endpoint was not met
but they still considered
that repeated IVIG may
be effective for skin
sclerosis in diffuse
cutaneous systemic
sclerosis.
Miyasaka (2012)24
Polymyositis and
dermatomyositis
resistant to
corticosteroids
Not specified in the
abstract
Significant
improvements in
manual muscle test
score, serum creatine
kinase level, and
activities of daily living
score were observed in
both groups
The authors concluded
that IVIG therapy with
polyethylene glycol-
treated human IgG
could be used with the
same precautions as
other IVIG therapy.
Jee (2011)25
Moderate to severe
childhood atopic
dermatitis
Children Disease severity index
was significantly
reduced in the IVIG
group at 3 months
The authors concluded
that IVIG may improve
symptoms at 3 months
of use but the
improvement may not
be sustained beyond 6
months.
Amagai (2009)26
Pemphigus vulgaris or
pemphigus foliaceus
Patients who failed
prednisolone
Age not specified in the
abstract
Disease activity and
enzyme-linked
immunosorbent assay
scores were
significantly lower in
the high-dose IVIG
The authors concluded
that high-dose IVIG was
effective and safe for
patients with pemphigus
who were resistant to
steroid treatment.
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 9
Table 2: Summary of Included Studies
First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’
Conclusions
group
There was no
difference in safety
between 400mg/kg,
200 mg/kg or placebo
doses
DAS15 = disease activity score on day 15DRESS = drug rash w ith eosinophilia and systemic symptoms; IVIG = intravenous immunoglobulin; MRSS
= modif ied Rodnan skin thickness score; NR = not reported; SJS = Stevens-Johnson syndrome; SMR = standardized mortality ratio; TEN = toxic
epidermal necrolysis
References Summarized
Health Technology Assessments
No literature identified.
Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
Miguel D, Lukacs J, Illing T, Elsner P. Treatment of necrobiotic xanthogranuloma - a 1.
systematic review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):221-35.
PubMed: PM27436448
Zerdes I, Tolia M, Nikolaou M, Tsoukalas N, Velentza L, Hajiioannou J, et al. How can 2.
we effectively address the paraneoplastic dermatomyositis: diagnosis, risk factors and
treatment options. J BUON. 2017 Jul;22(4):1073-80.
PubMed: PM28952230
Zimmermann S, Sekula P, Venhoff M, Motschall E, Knaus J, Schumacher M, et al. 3.
Systemic immunomodulating therapies for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic
epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2017
Jun 1;153(6):514-22.
PubMed: PM28329382
Bommersbach TJ, Lapid MI, Leung JG, Cunningham JL, Rum mans TA, Kung S. 4.
Management of psychotropic drug-induced DRESS syndrome: a systematic review.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Jun;91(6):787-801.
PubMed: PM27126302
Cholera M, Chainani-Wu N. Management of pemphigus vulgaris. Adv Ther [Internet]. 5.
2016 Jun [cited 2017 Nov 3];33(6):910-58. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920839
PubMed: PM27287854
Huang YC, Chien YN, Chen YT, Li YC, Chen TJ. Intravenous immunoglobulin for the 6.
treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. G Ital
Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Oct;151(5):515-24.
PubMed: PM27248150
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27436448http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28952230http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28329382http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126302http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920839http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287854http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27248150
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 10
Ye LP, Zhang C, Zhu QX. The effect of intravenous immunoglobulin combined with 7.
corticosteroid on the progression of Stevens -Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal
necrolysis: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Nov
3];11(11):e0167120. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5130247
PubMed: PM27902746
Atzmony L, Hodak E, Leshem YA, Rosenbaum O, Gdalevich M, Anhalt GJ, et al. The 8.
role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am
Acad Dermatol. 2015 Aug;73(2):264-71.
PubMed: PM26088689
Barron SJ, Del Vecchio MT, Aronoff SC. Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of 9.
Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a meta-analysis with meta-
regression of observational studies. Int J Dermatol. 2015 Jan;54(1):108-15.
PubMed: PM24697283
Canavan TN, Mathes EF, Frieden I, Shinkai K. Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash 10.
and mucositis as a syndrome distinct from Stevens -Johnson syndrome and erythema
multiforme: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Feb;72(2):239-45.
PubMed: PM25592340
McMillan R, Taylor J, Shephard M, Ahmed R, Carrozzo M, Setterfield J, et al. World 11.
Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: a systematic review of the treatment of mucocutaneous
pemphigus vulgaris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Aug;120(2):132-
42.
PubMed: PM25934414
Taylor J, McMillan R, Shephard M, Setterfield J, Ahmed R, Carrozzo M, et al. World 12.
Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: a systematic review of the treatment of mucous
membrane pemphigoid. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015
Aug;120(2):161-71.
PubMed: PM25953640
Vermaak E, Tansley SL, McHugh NJ. The evidence for immunotherapy in 13.
dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol. 2015
Dec;34(12):2089-95.
PubMed: PM26299472
Zhao CY, Murrell DF. Pemphigus vulgaris: an evidence-based treatment update. Drugs. 14.
2015 Feb;75(3):271-84.
PubMed: PM25655250
Atzmony L, Hodak E, Gdalevich M, Rosenbaum O, Mimouni D. Treatment of pemphigus 15.
vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin
Dermatol. 2014 Dec;15(6):503-15.
PubMed: PM25403548
Fortin PM, Tejani AM, Bassett K, Musini VM. Intravenous immunoglobulin as adjuvant 16.
therapy for Wegener's granulomatosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
[Internet] 2013 [cited 2017 Nov 3]; 1: CD007057. Available from:
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007057.pub3/full
Gordon PA, Winer JB, Hoogendijk JE, Choy EH. Immunosuppressant and 17.
immunomodulatory treatment for dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Cochrane
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5130247http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27902746http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088689http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24697283http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25592340http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25934414http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25953640http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26299472http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25655250http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25403548http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007057.pub3/full
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 11
Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;(8):CD003643.
PubMed: PM22895935
Huang YC, Li YC, Chen TJ. The efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin for the 18.
treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J
Dermatol. 2012 Aug;167(2):424-32.
PubMed: PM22458671
Wang DX, Shu XM, Tian XL, Chen F, Zu N, Ma L, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin 19.
therapy in adult patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis: a systematic literature
review. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 May;31(5):801-6.
PubMed: PM22274797
Del Pozzo-Magana BR, Lazo-Langner A, Carleton B, Castro-Pastrana LI, Rieder MJ. A 20.
systematic review of treatment of drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic
epidermal necrolysis in children. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2011;18:e121-e133.
PubMed: PM21467603
Roujeau JC, Bastuji-Garin S. Systematic review of treatments for Stevens -Johnson 21.
syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis using the SCORTEN score as a tool for
evaluating mortality. Ther Adv Drug Saf [Internet]. 2011 Jun [cited 2017 Nov 3];2(3):87-
94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110817
PubMed: PM25083204
Randomized Controlled Trials
Amagai M, Ikeda S, Hashimoto T, Mizuashi M, Fujisawa A, Ihn H, et al. A randomized 22.
double-blind trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for bullous pemphigoid. J Dermatol Sci.
2017 Feb;85(2):77-84.
PubMed: PM27876358
Takehara K, Ihn H, Sato S. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: 23.
intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic
sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;31(2 Suppl 76):151-6.
PubMed: PM23910617
Miyasaka N, Hara M, Koike T, Saito E, Yamada M, Tanaka Y, et al. Effects of 24.
intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in Japanese patients with polymyositis and
dermatomyositis resistant to corticosteroids: a randomized double-blind placebo-
controlled trial. Mod Rheumatol [Internet]. 2012 Jun [cited 2017 Nov 3];22(3):382-93.
Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375426
PubMed: PM21971943
Jee SJ, Kim JH, Baek HS, Lee HB, Oh JW. Long-term efficacy of intravenous 25.
immunoglobulin therapy for moderate to severe childhood atopic dermatitis. Allergy
Asthma Immunol Res [Internet]. 2011 Apr [cited 2017 Nov 3];3(2):89-95. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062801
PubMed: PM21461247
Amagai M, Ikeda S, Shimizu H, Iizuka H, Hanada K, Aiba S, et al. A randomized 26.
double-blind trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for pemphigus. J Am Acad Dermatol.
2009 Apr;60(4):595-603.
PubMed: PM19293008
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22895935http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22458671http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22274797http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21467603http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110817http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25083204http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27876358http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23910617http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375426http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21971943http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062801http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21461247http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19293008
SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 12
Appendix — Further Information
Systematic Reviews of Case Studies or Case Series
Song H, Lahood N, Mostaghimi A. Intravenous immunoglobulin as adjunct therapy for 27.
refractory pyoderma gangrenosum: systematic review of cases and case s eries. Br J
Dermatol. 2017 Jul 25.
PubMed: PM28742926
Callander J, Robson Y, Ingram J, Piguet V. Treatment of clinically amyopathic 28.
dermatomyositis in adults: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2016 May 11.
PubMed: PM27167896
Case Studies and Case Series
Gaitanis G, Spyridonos P, Patmanidis K, Koulouras V, Nakos G, Tzaphlidou M, et al. 29.
Treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis with the combination of infliximab and high-dose
intravenous immunoglobulin. Dermatology. 2012;224(2):134-9.
PubMed: PM22572593
Cruz MJ, Mota A, Baudrier T, Gil-da-Costa MJ, Azevedo F. Stevens-Johnson syndrome 30.
associated with cytomegalovirus infection in a child with ependymoma. J Dermatol Case
Rep [Internet]. 2010 Apr 11 [cited 2017 Nov 3];4(1):11-4. Available from:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157806
PubMed: PM21886739
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28742926http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167896http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22572593http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157806http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21886739