Click here to load reader

CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY OF ......dermatomyositis and polymyositis,13,17,19,24 Wegener's granulomatosis,16 skin sclerosis in diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis, 23 and

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Service Line: Rapid Response Service

    Version: 1.0

    Publication Date: November 3, 2017

    Report Length: 12 Pages

    CADTH RAPID RESPONSE REPORT: SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS

    Off-Label Use of Intravenous Immunoglobulin for Dermatological Conditions: Clinical Effectiveness

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 2

    Authors: Michelle Clark, Sarah Visintini

    Cite As: Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions: Clinical Ef f ectiveness . Ottawa: CADTH; 2017 Nov . (CADTH rapid

    response report: summary of abstracts).

    Acknowledgments:

    Disclaimer: The inf ormation in this document is intended to help Canadian health care decision-makers, health care prof essionals, health sy stems leaders,

    and policy -makers make well-inf ormed decisions and thereby improv e the quality of health care serv ices. While patients and others may access this document,

    the document is made av ailable f or inf ormational purposes only and no representations or warranties are made with respect to its f itness f or any particular

    purpose. The inf ormation in this document should not be used as a substitute f or prof essional medical adv ice or as a substitute f or the application of cl inical

    judgment in respect of the care of a particular patient or other prof essional judgment in any decision-making process. The Canadian Agency f or Drugs and

    Technologies in Health (CADTH) does not endorse any inf ormation, drugs, therapies, treatments, products, processes, or serv ic es.

    While care has been taken to ensure that the inf ormation prepared by CADTH in this document is acc urate, complete, and up-to-date as at the applicable date

    the material was f irst published by CADTH, CADTH does not make any guarantees to that ef f ect. CADTH does not guarantee and is not responsible f or the

    quality , currency , propriety , accuracy, or reasonableness of any statements, information, or conclusions contained in any third-party materials used in preparing

    this document. The v iews and opinions of third parties published in this document do not necessarily state or ref lect those of CADTH.

    CADTH is not responsible f or any errors, omissions, injury , loss, or damage arising f rom or relating to the use (or misuse) of any inf ormation, statements, or

    conclusions contained in or implied by the contents of this document or any of the source materials.

    This document may contain links to third-party websites. CADTH does not hav e control ov er the content of such sites. Use of third-party sites is gov erned by

    the third-party website owners’ own terms and conditions set out f or such sites. CADTH does not make any guarantee with respect to any inf ormation

    contained on such third-party sites and CADTH is not responsible f or any injury , loss, or damage suf f ered as a result of using such third-party sites. CADTH

    has no responsibility f or the collection, use, and disc losure of personal inf ormation by third-party sites.

    Subject to the af orementioned limitations, the v iews expressed herein are those of CADTH and do not necessarily represent the v iews of Canada’s f ederal,

    prov incial, or territorial gov ernments or any third party supplier of inf ormation.

    This document is prepared and intended f or use in the context of the Canadian health care sy stem. The use of this document outside of Canada is done so at

    the user’s own risk.

    This disclaimer and any questions or matters of any nature arising f rom or relating to the content or use (or misuse) of this document will be gov erned by and

    interpreted in accordance with the laws of the Prov ince of Ontario and the laws of Canada applicable therein, and all proceedings shall be subject to the

    exclusiv e jurisdiction of the courts of the Prov ince of Ontario, Canada.

    The copy right and other intellectual property rights in this document are owned by CADTH and its licensors. These rights are protected by the Canadian

    Copyright Act and other national and international laws and agreements. Users are permitted to make copies of this document f or non-commercial purposes

    only , prov ided it is not modif ied when reproduced and appropriate credit is giv en to CADTH and its licensors.

    About CADTH: CADTH is an independent, not-f or-prof it organization responsible f or prov iding Canada’s health care decision-makers with objectiv e ev idence

    to help make inf ormed decisions about the optimal use of drugs, medical dev ices, diagnostics, and procedures in our health care sy stem.

    Funding: CADTH receiv es f unding f rom Canada’s f ederal, prov incial, and territorial gov ernments, with the exception of Quebec.

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 3

    Research Question

    What is the clinical effectiveness of the off-label use of intravenous or subcutaneous

    immunoglobulin for the treatment of dermatological conditions?

    Key Findings

    Twenty-one systematic reviews and meta-analyses and five randomized controlled trials

    were identified regarding the clinical effectiveness of the off-label use of intravenous or

    subcutaneous immunoglobulin for the treatment of dermatological conditions.

    Methods

    A limited literature search was conducted on key resources including PubMed, The

    Cochrane Library, University of York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD)

    databases, Canadian and major international health technology agencies, as well as a

    focused Internet search. Methodological filters were applied to limit retrieval to health

    technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and randomized controlled

    trials. Where possible, retrieval was limited to the human population. The search was also

    limited to English language documents published between January 1, 2009 and October

    24, 2017. Internet links were provided, where available.

    Selection Criteria

    One reviewer screened citations and selected studies based on the inclusion criteria

    presented in Table 1.

    Table 1: Selection Criteria

    Population Patients any age with dermatological conditions that are not approved indications for IVIG, including but not limited to:

    Atopic dermatitis/eczema

    Autoimmune bullous diseases

    Dermatomyositis/Polymyositis

    Pemphigus

    Pyoderma gangrenosum

    Stevens-Johnson syndrome

    Systemic sclerosis/scleroderma

    Toxic epidermal necrolysis

    Urticaria

    Intervention Human IVIG or SCIG products, including but not limited to those available in Canada, alone or in combination with corticosteroids or other immunomodulation therapies.

    Comparator Treatment as usual, placebo, no treatment

    Outcomes Clinical benefits and harms

    Study Designs Health technology assessments, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 4

    Results

    Rapid Response reports are organized so that the higher quality evidence is presented first.

    Therefore, health technology assessment reports, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses

    are presented first. These are followed by randomized controlled trials.

    Twenty-one systematic reviews and meta-analyses and five randomized controlled trials

    were identified regarding the clinical effectiveness of the off-label use of intravenous or

    subcutaneous immunoglobulin for the treatment of dermatological conditions. No relevant

    health technology assessments were identified.

    Additional references of potential interest are provided in the appendix.

    Overall Summary of Findings

    Twenty-one systematic reviews and meta-analyses1-21

    and five randomized controlled

    trials22-26

    were identified regarding the clinical effectiveness of the off-label use of

    intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin for the treatment of dermatological

    conditions. The dermatological conditions that were studied included necrobiotic

    xanthogranuloma,1 paraneoplastic dermatomyositis,

    2 Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic

    epidermal necrolysis,3,6,7,9,18,20,21

    drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms,4

    pemphigus,5,8,11,12,14,15,22,26

    Mycoplasma pneumoniae-associated mucocutaneous disease,10

    dermatomyositis and polymyositis,13,17,19,24

    Wegener's granulomatosis,16

    skin sclerosis in

    diffuse cutaneous systemic sclerosis,23

    and moderate to severe childhood atopic

    dermatitis.25

    The results of the studies varied in reference to the effectiveness of

    intravenous immunoglobulin for these conditions. Further details are provided in Table 2.

    Table 2: Summary of Included Studies

    First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’

    Conclusions

    Systematic Reviews

    Miguel (2017)1 Necrobiotic

    xanthogranuloma

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    NR in the abstract High-dose IVIG was

    specified as one

    treatment option

    identified in the review

    but not results or

    conclusions were

    provided in the abstract.

    Zerdes (2017)2 Paraneoplastic

    dermatomyositis

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    NR in the abstract IVIG may be a viable

    alternative treatment for

    cases resistant to

    prednisone.

    Zimmermann (2017)3 SJS/TEN Not specified in the

    abstract

    NR in the abstract There were no

    beneficial findings

    identified regarding the

    use of IVIG for

    SJS/TEN.

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 5

    Table 2: Summary of Included Studies

    First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’

    Conclusions

    Bommersbach (2016)4 DRESS Not specified in the

    abstract

    NR in the abstract IVIG may be a

    promising management

    option for DRESS.

    Cholera (2016)5 Pemphigus vulgaris Not specified in the

    abstract

    NR in the abstract IVIG was reported in

    the literature as a

    treatment option for

    patients who did not

    respond to standard

    treatment.

    Huang (2016)6 TEN Not specified in the

    abstract

    Overall mortality =

    24.2%

    Overall mortality of

    adults treated with

    high-dose IVIG =

    11.7%

    The authors concluded

    the evidence did not

    support the use of IVIG,

    including high-dose, for

    the treatment of TEN.

    Ye (2016)7 SJS/TEN Not specified in the

    abstract

    Corticosteroid IVIG

    combination

    significantly reduced

    recovery time

    compared with

    corticosteroid alone

    Beneficial effects

    were greater for those

    treated with high-dose

    IVIG

    IVIG use was

    associated with a

    decrease in mortality

    The authors concluded

    that the combination of

    IVIG and corticosteroid

    may reduce recovery

    time for SJS/TEN.

    Atzmony (2015)8 Pemphigus vulgaris and

    pemphigus foliaceus

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    Adjuvants, including

    IVIG, were found to

    decrease the risk of

    relapse.

    Different adjuvants

    were pooled in the

    analysis

    The authors concluded

    that adjuvant therapies,

    including IVIG, may

    have a role in treating

    pemphigus.

    Barron (2015)9 SJS/TEN Not specified in the

    abstract

    “Meta-regression

    demonstrated a

    strong inverse

    correlation between

    IVIG dosage and

    SMRs.”

    The authors concluded

    that IVIG at doses ≥2

    g/kg may significantly

    reduce mortality in

    these patients.

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 6

    Table 2: Summary of Included Studies

    First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’

    Conclusions

    SMRs did not differ

    significantly between

    studies

    Canavan (2015)10

    Mycoplasma

    pneumoniae-associated

    mucocutaneous

    disease

    All ages NR in the abstract IVIG was identified from

    the literature as a

    treatment option.

    McMillan (2015)11

    Pemphigus vulgaris Not specified in the

    abstract

    NR in the abstract IVIG was identified from

    the literature as a

    treatment option.

    Taylor (2015)12

    Mucous membrane

    pemphigoid

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    NR in the abstract The authors identified

    IVIG as a promising

    intervention for mucous

    membrane pemphigoid.

    Vermaak (2015)13

    Dermatomyositis and

    polymyositis

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    NR in the abstract The authors concluded

    that no specific

    treatment could be

    recommended based

    on the results of the

    review; however, IVIG

    was identified as one

    treatment with improved

    outcomes.

    Zhao (2015)14

    Pemphigus vulgaris Not specified in the

    abstract

    NR in the abstract The authors concluded

    that the available

    evidence was

    incomplete and

    inconclusive. IVIG

    appeared to be a

    promising treatment but

    requires further study

    for confirmation.

    Atzmony (2014)15

    Pemphigus vulgaris and

    pemphigus foliaceus

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    IVIG had more

    favourable short-term

    efficacy versus placeb0

    Further study is

    required before

    treatment

    recommendations can

    be made.

    Fortin (2013)16

    Wegener's

    granulomatosis

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    No significant difference

    was reported in

    mortality, serious

    The authors concluded

    there was not sufficient

    evidence to recommend

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 7

    Table 2: Summary of Included Studies

    First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’

    Conclusions

    adverse events, time to

    relapse, open-label

    rescue therapy, and

    infection rates between

    IVIG and placebo as

    adjuvant treatment.

    IVIG as adjuvant

    treatment.

    Gordon (2012)17

    Dermatomyositis and

    polymyositis

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    Significant improvement

    was reported in muscle

    strength scores over 3

    months in the IVIG

    group,

    The authors concluded

    that the review

    highlighted the need for

    RCTs to assess the

    efficacy of treatments.

    Huang (2012)18

    TEN All ages Overall mortality of

    patients treated with

    IVIG = 19.9%

    Treatment with high-

    dose IVIG resulted in

    significantly lower

    mortality than low-

    dose IVIG

    Pediatric patients had

    significantly lower

    mortality than adults

    The authors concluded

    that the evidence did

    not support the clinical

    benefit of IVIG.

    Wang (2012)19

    Polymyositis or

    dermatomyositis

    Adult patients IVIG + corticosteroid

    significantly improved

    muscle strength and

    decreased serum

    creatine kinase versus

    placebo

    The authors concluded

    that IVIG was an

    effective and relatively

    safe treatment for

    patients with

    polymyositis or

    dermatomyositis

    Del Pozzo-Magana

    (2011)20

    SJS/TEN Children IVIG + steroids

    had similar results as

    dressing and support

    treatment alone

    longer time to achieve

    remission

    associated with more

    complications and

    deaths

    The authors concluded

    that IVIG + steroids

    improved outcomes but

    the results were

    variable between the

    identified studies.

    Roujeau (2011)21

    SJS/TEN Not specified in the

    abstract

    Pooled mortality ratio =

    0.82

    The authors concluded

    that neither

    corticosteroids nor IVIG

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 8

    Table 2: Summary of Included Studies

    First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’

    Conclusions

    resulted in any

    important reduction in

    the risk of mortality.

    Randomized Controlled Trials

    Amagai (2017)22

    Bullous pemphigoid Patients who failed

    prednisolone

    Age not specified in the

    abstract

    DAS15 was 12.5

    points lower in the

    IVIG group versus

    placebo

    The authors concluded

    that IVIG was

    therapeutically

    beneficial for patients

    with bullous pemphigoid

    who were resistant to

    steroids.

    Takehara (2013)23

    Skin sclerosis in diffuse

    cutaneous systemic

    sclerosis

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    There was no

    significant difference

    observed in MRSS

    between IVIG and

    placebo groups

    The authors indicated

    that the primary

    endpoint was not met

    but they still considered

    that repeated IVIG may

    be effective for skin

    sclerosis in diffuse

    cutaneous systemic

    sclerosis.

    Miyasaka (2012)24

    Polymyositis and

    dermatomyositis

    resistant to

    corticosteroids

    Not specified in the

    abstract

    Significant

    improvements in

    manual muscle test

    score, serum creatine

    kinase level, and

    activities of daily living

    score were observed in

    both groups

    The authors concluded

    that IVIG therapy with

    polyethylene glycol-

    treated human IgG

    could be used with the

    same precautions as

    other IVIG therapy.

    Jee (2011)25

    Moderate to severe

    childhood atopic

    dermatitis

    Children Disease severity index

    was significantly

    reduced in the IVIG

    group at 3 months

    The authors concluded

    that IVIG may improve

    symptoms at 3 months

    of use but the

    improvement may not

    be sustained beyond 6

    months.

    Amagai (2009)26

    Pemphigus vulgaris or

    pemphigus foliaceus

    Patients who failed

    prednisolone

    Age not specified in the

    abstract

    Disease activity and

    enzyme-linked

    immunosorbent assay

    scores were

    significantly lower in

    the high-dose IVIG

    The authors concluded

    that high-dose IVIG was

    effective and safe for

    patients with pemphigus

    who were resistant to

    steroid treatment.

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 9

    Table 2: Summary of Included Studies

    First Author, Year Indication Population Results Authors’

    Conclusions

    group

    There was no

    difference in safety

    between 400mg/kg,

    200 mg/kg or placebo

    doses

    DAS15 = disease activity score on day 15DRESS = drug rash w ith eosinophilia and systemic symptoms; IVIG = intravenous immunoglobulin; MRSS

    = modif ied Rodnan skin thickness score; NR = not reported; SJS = Stevens-Johnson syndrome; SMR = standardized mortality ratio; TEN = toxic

    epidermal necrolysis

    References Summarized

    Health Technology Assessments

    No literature identified.

    Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses

    Miguel D, Lukacs J, Illing T, Elsner P. Treatment of necrobiotic xanthogranuloma - a 1.

    systematic review. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Feb;31(2):221-35.

    PubMed: PM27436448

    Zerdes I, Tolia M, Nikolaou M, Tsoukalas N, Velentza L, Hajiioannou J, et al. How can 2.

    we effectively address the paraneoplastic dermatomyositis: diagnosis, risk factors and

    treatment options. J BUON. 2017 Jul;22(4):1073-80.

    PubMed: PM28952230

    Zimmermann S, Sekula P, Venhoff M, Motschall E, Knaus J, Schumacher M, et al. 3.

    Systemic immunomodulating therapies for Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic

    epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Dermatol. 2017

    Jun 1;153(6):514-22.

    PubMed: PM28329382

    Bommersbach TJ, Lapid MI, Leung JG, Cunningham JL, Rum mans TA, Kung S. 4.

    Management of psychotropic drug-induced DRESS syndrome: a systematic review.

    Mayo Clin Proc. 2016 Jun;91(6):787-801.

    PubMed: PM27126302

    Cholera M, Chainani-Wu N. Management of pemphigus vulgaris. Adv Ther [Internet]. 5.

    2016 Jun [cited 2017 Nov 3];33(6):910-58. Available from:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920839

    PubMed: PM27287854

    Huang YC, Chien YN, Chen YT, Li YC, Chen TJ. Intravenous immunoglobulin for the 6.

    treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. G Ital

    Dermatol Venereol. 2016 Oct;151(5):515-24.

    PubMed: PM27248150

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27436448http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28952230http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28329382http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27126302http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4920839http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27287854http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27248150

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 10

    Ye LP, Zhang C, Zhu QX. The effect of intravenous immunoglobulin combined with 7.

    corticosteroid on the progression of Stevens -Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal

    necrolysis: a meta-analysis. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 Nov

    3];11(11):e0167120. Available from:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5130247

    PubMed: PM27902746

    Atzmony L, Hodak E, Leshem YA, Rosenbaum O, Gdalevich M, Anhalt GJ, et al. The 8.

    role of adjuvant therapy in pemphigus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am

    Acad Dermatol. 2015 Aug;73(2):264-71.

    PubMed: PM26088689

    Barron SJ, Del Vecchio MT, Aronoff SC. Intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of 9.

    Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis: a meta-analysis with meta-

    regression of observational studies. Int J Dermatol. 2015 Jan;54(1):108-15.

    PubMed: PM24697283

    Canavan TN, Mathes EF, Frieden I, Shinkai K. Mycoplasma pneumoniae-induced rash 10.

    and mucositis as a syndrome distinct from Stevens -Johnson syndrome and erythema

    multiforme: a systematic review. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Feb;72(2):239-45.

    PubMed: PM25592340

    McMillan R, Taylor J, Shephard M, Ahmed R, Carrozzo M, Setterfield J, et al. World 11.

    Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: a systematic review of the treatment of mucocutaneous

    pemphigus vulgaris. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015 Aug;120(2):132-

    42.

    PubMed: PM25934414

    Taylor J, McMillan R, Shephard M, Setterfield J, Ahmed R, Carrozzo M, et al. World 12.

    Workshop on Oral Medicine VI: a systematic review of the treatment of mucous

    membrane pemphigoid. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015

    Aug;120(2):161-71.

    PubMed: PM25953640

    Vermaak E, Tansley SL, McHugh NJ. The evidence for immunotherapy in 13.

    dermatomyositis and polymyositis: a systematic review. Clin Rheumatol. 2015

    Dec;34(12):2089-95.

    PubMed: PM26299472

    Zhao CY, Murrell DF. Pemphigus vulgaris: an evidence-based treatment update. Drugs. 14.

    2015 Feb;75(3):271-84.

    PubMed: PM25655250

    Atzmony L, Hodak E, Gdalevich M, Rosenbaum O, Mimouni D. Treatment of pemphigus 15.

    vulgaris and pemphigus foliaceus: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin

    Dermatol. 2014 Dec;15(6):503-15.

    PubMed: PM25403548

    Fortin PM, Tejani AM, Bassett K, Musini VM. Intravenous immunoglobulin as adjuvant 16.

    therapy for Wegener's granulomatosis. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

    [Internet] 2013 [cited 2017 Nov 3]; 1: CD007057. Available from:

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007057.pub3/full

    Gordon PA, Winer JB, Hoogendijk JE, Choy EH. Immunosuppressant and 17.

    immunomodulatory treatment for dermatomyositis and polymyositis. Cochrane

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5130247http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27902746http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26088689http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24697283http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25592340http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25934414http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25953640http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26299472http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25655250http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25403548http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/14651858.CD007057.pub3/full

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 11

    Database Syst Rev. 2012 Aug 15;(8):CD003643.

    PubMed: PM22895935

    Huang YC, Li YC, Chen TJ. The efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin for the 18.

    treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J

    Dermatol. 2012 Aug;167(2):424-32.

    PubMed: PM22458671

    Wang DX, Shu XM, Tian XL, Chen F, Zu N, Ma L, et al. Intravenous immunoglobulin 19.

    therapy in adult patients with polymyositis/dermatomyositis: a systematic literature

    review. Clin Rheumatol. 2012 May;31(5):801-6.

    PubMed: PM22274797

    Del Pozzo-Magana BR, Lazo-Langner A, Carleton B, Castro-Pastrana LI, Rieder MJ. A 20.

    systematic review of treatment of drug-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome and toxic

    epidermal necrolysis in children. J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2011;18:e121-e133.

    PubMed: PM21467603

    Roujeau JC, Bastuji-Garin S. Systematic review of treatments for Stevens -Johnson 21.

    syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis using the SCORTEN score as a tool for

    evaluating mortality. Ther Adv Drug Saf [Internet]. 2011 Jun [cited 2017 Nov 3];2(3):87-

    94. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110817

    PubMed: PM25083204

    Randomized Controlled Trials

    Amagai M, Ikeda S, Hashimoto T, Mizuashi M, Fujisawa A, Ihn H, et al. A randomized 22.

    double-blind trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for bullous pemphigoid. J Dermatol Sci.

    2017 Feb;85(2):77-84.

    PubMed: PM27876358

    Takehara K, Ihn H, Sato S. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial: 23.

    intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in patients with diffuse cutaneous systemic

    sclerosis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013 Mar;31(2 Suppl 76):151-6.

    PubMed: PM23910617

    Miyasaka N, Hara M, Koike T, Saito E, Yamada M, Tanaka Y, et al. Effects of 24.

    intravenous immunoglobulin therapy in Japanese patients with polymyositis and

    dermatomyositis resistant to corticosteroids: a randomized double-blind placebo-

    controlled trial. Mod Rheumatol [Internet]. 2012 Jun [cited 2017 Nov 3];22(3):382-93.

    Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375426

    PubMed: PM21971943

    Jee SJ, Kim JH, Baek HS, Lee HB, Oh JW. Long-term efficacy of intravenous 25.

    immunoglobulin therapy for moderate to severe childhood atopic dermatitis. Allergy

    Asthma Immunol Res [Internet]. 2011 Apr [cited 2017 Nov 3];3(2):89-95. Available from:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062801

    PubMed: PM21461247

    Amagai M, Ikeda S, Shimizu H, Iizuka H, Hanada K, Aiba S, et al. A randomized 26.

    double-blind trial of intravenous immunoglobulin for pemphigus. J Am Acad Dermatol.

    2009 Apr;60(4):595-603.

    PubMed: PM19293008

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22895935http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22458671http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22274797http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21467603http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4110817http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25083204http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27876358http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23910617http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3375426http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21971943http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3062801http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21461247http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19293008

  • SUMMARY OF ABSTRACTS Of f -Label Use of Intrav enous Immunoglobulin f or Dermatological Conditions 12

    Appendix — Further Information

    Systematic Reviews of Case Studies or Case Series

    Song H, Lahood N, Mostaghimi A. Intravenous immunoglobulin as adjunct therapy for 27.

    refractory pyoderma gangrenosum: systematic review of cases and case s eries. Br J

    Dermatol. 2017 Jul 25.

    PubMed: PM28742926

    Callander J, Robson Y, Ingram J, Piguet V. Treatment of clinically amyopathic 28.

    dermatomyositis in adults: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol. 2016 May 11.

    PubMed: PM27167896

    Case Studies and Case Series

    Gaitanis G, Spyridonos P, Patmanidis K, Koulouras V, Nakos G, Tzaphlidou M, et al. 29.

    Treatment of toxic epidermal necrolysis with the combination of infliximab and high-dose

    intravenous immunoglobulin. Dermatology. 2012;224(2):134-9.

    PubMed: PM22572593

    Cruz MJ, Mota A, Baudrier T, Gil-da-Costa MJ, Azevedo F. Stevens-Johnson syndrome 30.

    associated with cytomegalovirus infection in a child with ependymoma. J Dermatol Case

    Rep [Internet]. 2010 Apr 11 [cited 2017 Nov 3];4(1):11-4. Available from:

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157806

    PubMed: PM21886739

    http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28742926http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27167896http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22572593http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157806http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21886739