Upload
wilfrid-bradford
View
216
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
(C)1999 NTT 1
Transfer of TINA Results to Standards Bodies
Transfer of TINA Results to Standards Bodies
TINA2000Paris, France, 13-15 September 2000
TINA Technical Architecture Board Vice Chair
KITAMI, Kenichi KITAMI, Kenichi
OMG Board of DirectorSG11 WP1 Chair
Chair, Technical Assembly of TTC, Japan
NTT Information Sharing Laboratory Group
(C)1999 NTT 2
Objectives of this Presentation
Provide an Overview of TINA Results transferred to Standard BodiesSecure platform to keep TINA SpecificationsEnsure the effectiveness of TINA Technologies
(C)1999 NTT 3
Collaborating Standard Bodies
TINA-C has been contributing to many Leading Standard Bodies. They include:
The Object Management Group: OMG TINA-C has Cross Membership with OMG.
TeleManagement Forum: TMF The International Telecommunication Union-Telecommun
ication Sector: ITU-T Study Group 10: Telecommunication Languages and Software Study Group 11: Signalling
3rd Generation Partnership Project: 3GPP in collaboration with European Telecommunication Standard Institute:ETSI (SPAN3)
(C)1999 NTT 4
Overview of the Achievement: OMG TINA Access Session and Consumer-Retailer RfP Spe
cifications have been reflected to an OMG Standard named as “Telecommunications Service Access and Subscription facility (TSAS)” developed by the Telecom Domain TF. Through the merging process for TSAS, TINA Results has als
o been reflected to the corresponding Parlay Specification.
A White Paper for Open Services Marketplace (OSM) RFI was created reflecting TINA results by the active involvement of TINA-C members.
TINA ODL highlighted the Telecom Requirements for the Object Interfaces, and they are reflected in CORBA Component Model (CCM) approved this year.
(C)1999 NTT 6
Overview of the Achievement: ITU-T
[ Achievements in ITU-T SG10 ] SG10 approved in 1999 the Object Definition
Language as Z.130, based on TINA-C ODL. SG10 will approve DPE Architecture as Z.600, based
on the TINA DPE Architecture this November.
[ Achievements in ITU-T SG11 ] SG11 approved two Supplements covering TINA Busi
ness Model, TINA-C Service Architecture, Ret specification in its Q.1 for “Signalling and Protocol Framework for Evolving Environment (SPFEE)”.
SG11 also approved a Supplement (TRQ.2001) including TINA's "session" definitions and Business Model in its Q.6 for “B-ISDN Signaling Requirements”.
(C)1999 NTT 7
Business model in TRQ.2001 approved by SG11
Network connectivity provider
Retailer
BrokerConsumer Service
provider
Logical reference point designation: LRP-XY (between domain “X” and domain “Y”)
LRP-CC LRP-SS
LRP-NN
LRP-RR
LRP-BB
LRP-SNLRP-RNLRP-NBLRP-CN
LRP-SR
LRP-SB
LRP-CR
LRP-CB
LRP-CS
LRP-RB
TRQ.2001: GENERAL ASPECTS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF UNIFIED SIGNALLING REQUIREMENTS
(C)1999 NTT 8
Overview of the Achievement: 3GPP and TMF
[ Achievements in 3GPP ] 3GPP in cooperation with ETSI SPAN3 approved Ope
n Service Architecture (OSA) containing specification relevant to OMG’s “Telecommunications Service Access and Subscription facility (TSAS)” which is reflecting TINA Access Session and Consumer-Retailer RfP specification.
[ Achievement in TMF ] The collaboration work plan is in preparation,
including mapping between TINA business model and TMF business process, connection mgmt and reference points, and IP control mgmt issues.
(C)1999 NTT 9
Ongoing Activities
OMG will continue to be a center of TINA-based Standard development in many areas including: TINA Service Architecture and Reference Points Specification, Resource Architecture, Computing Architecture and Compliance &Testing framework (CAT).
SG10 will continue to standardize "DPE architecture”. It will also foster the CAT Work with broader scope.
In 3GPP, TINA TSAS was reflected to OSA of Release ‘99. Reflection of TINA SA to Release ‘00 is ongoing.
(C)1999 NTT 10
Ongoing Activities (continued) SG11 proposed “API/Object Interface” as a new
Question. It will foster the following activities: Creation of Roadmap on related activities/results TINA-related activities/results will be contributed to the SG11
Nov./Dec. 2000 meeting It will refer the work of 3GPP OSA+ ETSI SPAN3
IETF is developing standards influenced by TINA results: TINA Business Model is identified beneficial for the
work done within e.g. IETF Policy Framework WG. Activity on Network Information Model based on the
TINA NRIM has also been initiated. TMF is developing standards covering Service
Management and DPE
(C)1999 NTT 11
OngoingOngoingActivitiesActivities
IETF<Policy Framework>
IETF<Policy Framework>
SG11 <API/OI> SG11
<API/OI>
Major Ongoing Activities (1/2)
TINABusiness
Model
TINA Service
Architecture
SG11 <Q.1 Supplement>
<TRQ2001>
OMG
<OSM>
OMG
<OSM>
OMG<TDTF TSAS>
Parlay<API>
HarmonizationthroughMerged Submission Process
3GPP/ETSI <OSA>
3GPP/ETSI <OSA>
TINA Reference
Points
(C)1999 NTT 12
OMG<TDTF> OMG<TDTF>
TMF<DPE> TMF<DPE>
TMF <Service Management>
TMF <Service Management>
OngoingOngoingActivitiesActivities
Major Ongoing Activities (2/2)
Computing Architecture/
DPE
TINA Network Resource
Architecture including IPNW mgmt
SG10 <Z.600> SG10
<Z.600>
OMG<CCM>
SG10 <Z.130>TINA ODLTINA ODL
(C)1999 NTT 13
New Question K: “API/Object Interface (OI) and Architecture for Signalling” proposed by SG11
Provide a cohesive Signaling Architecture for: Importing the results on API/OI of activities outside of SG11 Developing specific APIs/OI not being covered by outside activities
Provide a Roadmap capturing the tasks and the results of all API/Object Interface-related activities outside of the ITU-T
Define API/Object interface based specifications for those areas where urgent need is identified: This may include a possible reference to all or part of
the results of other standardization bodies in a co-operative way, if appropriate.
What new Recommendations, new Supplements and what enhancements to existing Recommendations and Supplements are required in order to:
(C)1999 NTT 14
Coverage of TINA Results by Standard Bodies
IN-TINA Adaptation
TINA Network Resource Archi-tecture including IPCM works
TINA ResultsCompliance and Testing FWTINA Business Model
TINA Service Architecture
Existing Results
EC
TINA Reference Point
Computing Arch./DPE
TINA ODL
Standard BodiesOngoing [SG10, OMG (Test SIG), ETSI MTS]
OMG, SG11 (Q.1, Q.6), Ongoing [IETF]
3GPP (OSA), Ongoing [SG11]
Ongoing [OMG (TDTF, ECDF, ADSS)]
Ongoing [OMG (TDTF OSM),TMF,
SG11 (API/OI)]
OMG (TSAS), SG11 (Q.1), 3GPP (OSA) +ETSI SPAN3
SG10 [ Z.600 ]Ongoing [OMG (TDTF, ORB/OS), TMF (ACT)] SG10 [ Z.130 ]Ongoing [ETSI SPAN3, SG11]
(C)1999 NTT 15
Conclusion
Wide-spread TINA Technologies have been serving as a basis for the creation of a number of new standards by leading bodies including OMG and ITU-T.
A number of activities are still going on to develop new standards based on TINA Results. Emerging new standards include those for 3rd generation mobile communication systems by 3GPP and TMF for Telecommunication Management.
One can conclude that TINA-C results have contributed significantly to laying the foundation for the Info-communication Networking Architecture and have been successfully transferred to appropriate standard bodies.
Wide-spread TINA Technologies have been serving as a basis for the creation of a number of new standards by leading bodies including OMG and ITU-T.
A number of activities are still going on to develop new standards based on TINA Results. Emerging new standards include those for 3rd generation mobile communication systems by 3GPP and TMF for Telecommunication Management.
One can conclude that TINA-C results have contributed significantly to laying the foundation for the Info-communication Networking Architecture and have been successfully transferred to appropriate standard bodies.
(C)1999 NTT 16
My personal conclusion
OMG: Marcel Mampaey, Mike Schenk, Hendrik Berndt
SG10: Anastasius Gavras, Tolga Yalcinkaya SG11: Hidetsugu Kobayashi, Rolfe Buhrke,
Kenichi Kitami 3GPP: Chelo Abarca TMF: Takeo Hamada IETF: Leif Byström
OMG: Marcel Mampaey, Mike Schenk, Hendrik Berndt
SG10: Anastasius Gavras, Tolga Yalcinkaya SG11: Hidetsugu Kobayashi, Rolfe Buhrke,
Kenichi Kitami 3GPP: Chelo Abarca TMF: Takeo Hamada IETF: Leif Byström
Standards are, in reality, driven by individuals. Achievements introduced have been made by a number of dedicated contributors including:
Standards are, in reality, driven by individuals. Achievements introduced have been made by a number of dedicated contributors including: