Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
This may be the author’s version of a work that was submitted/acceptedfor publication in the following source:
Collet, Christopher, Hine, Damian, & Du Plessis, Karen(2015)Employability skills: perspectives from a knowledge-intensive industry.Education and Training, 57 (5), pp. 532-559.
This file was downloaded from: https://eprints.qut.edu.au/84718/
c© Consult author(s) regarding copyright matters
This work is covered by copyright. Unless the document is being made available under aCreative Commons Licence, you must assume that re-use is limited to personal use andthat permission from the copyright owner must be obtained for all other uses. If the docu-ment is available under a Creative Commons License (or other specified license) then referto the Licence for details of permitted re-use. It is a condition of access that users recog-nise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. If you believe thatthis work infringes copyright please provide details by email to [email protected]
Notice: Please note that this document may not be the Version of Record(i.e. published version) of the work. Author manuscript versions (as Sub-mitted for peer review or as Accepted for publication after peer review) canbe identified by an absence of publisher branding and/or typeset appear-ance. If there is any doubt, please refer to the published source.
https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2014-0076
1
INPRESS:Education+Training,Vol.57,No.5,2015
EmployabilitySkills:PerspectivesfromaKnowledge‐Intensive
Industry.
ChrisCollet1,3,DamianHine2andKarenduPlessis1,2
AustralianLearningandTeachingCouncilTeachingFellow,
1SchoolofBiomedicalSciences,
QueenslandUniversityofTechnology,
Brisbane,Queensland4001Australia
2UQBusinessSchool,
UniversityofQueensland,
St.Lucia,Queensland4072Australia
3CorrespondingAuthor:
ChrisCollet
Address:
SchoolofBiomedicalSciences,
QueenslandUniversityofTechnology,
GPOBox2434,Brisbane,QLD4001Australia
Contactdetails:
E‐mail:‐ [email protected]
Phone:‐ 61‐7‐31385173
Fax:‐ 61‐7‐31381534
Acknowledgements:
ThisprojectwasfundedbyaTeachingFellowshiptoCCfromtheAustralianLearningand
TeachingCouncil.
2
EmployabilitySkills:PerspectivesfromaKnowledgeIntensive
Industry.
ABSTRACT
Purpose:Whiletheglobaleducationdebateremainsfocusedongraduateskillsand
employability,theabsenceofasharedlanguagebetweenstudent,academicandindustry
stakeholdergroupsmeansthatdefiningindustryskillsrequirementsisbothessentialand
difficult.Theaimofthisstudywastoassessgraduateskillsrequirementsinaknowledge
intensiveindustryfromademandperspectiveasdistinctfromacurriculum(supply)
viewpoint.
Design/methodology/approach:Skillsitemswerederivedfromabreadthofdisciplines
acrossacademic,policyandindustryliterature.CEOsandseniormanagersintheinnovation
andcommercialisationindustryweresurveyedregardingperceptionsofskillsingraduates
andskillsindemandbythefirm.Tworoundsofexploratoryfactoranalyseswereundertaken
toexamineemployers’perceptionsoftheskillsgap.
Findings:Firstorderanalysisresolved10broadconstructsthatrepresentcognitive,
interpersonalandintrapersonalskillsdomainsasappliedinthisindustry.Knowledge,
leadershipandinterprofessionalcollaborationfeatureasprominentskills.Secondorder
analysisrevealedemployers’perceptionsofgraduateskillsspecificallycentreon
organisationalfitandorganisationalsuccess.Anover‐archingthemerelatestoperformance
oftheindividualinorganisations.
Researchlimitations/implications:
Ourfindingssuggestthatthediscourseonemployabilityandthedesignofcurriculumneedto
shiftfrominstillinglistsofskillstowardsenablinggraduatestoperforminadiversityof
workplacecontextsandexpectationscentredonorganisationalpurpose.
Originality/value:Incontrasttotheheterogeneousnatureofindustrysurveys,wetargeteda
homogenoussectorthatisrepresentativeofknowledgeintensiveindustries.Thisstudy
contributestothebroaderstakeholderdialogueofthevalueandapplicationofgraduateskills
inthisandotherindustrysectors.
3
INTRODUCTION
Thehighereducationsectorplaysaleadingroleinthetransitiontoknowledge‐based
economiesthroughthesupplyoftechnologicalinnovationandskilledhumancapital(e.g.,
NCIHE,1997;EC,2003;NA,2007).However,concernshavelongbeenvoicedaboutthe
suitabilityofgraduatesforemployment,theapplicabilityoftheirskillstoachanging
economiclandscapeandthesubsequentimpactonproductivitythatarisesfroman
employabilityskillsgap(SCANS,1991;Packer,1993;NCIHE,1997;DETYA,1998;EC,2003;
Leitch,2006).Thedebateovergraduateskillsandemployabilityremainsoneofthecore
elementsofawidereducationdebatethatencompassesthecompoundinginfluencesofthe
globalisationofeducation(Adelman,2009),evolvingworkplacerequirementsandindustry
demographicswroughtbynewtechnologies(Levy,2010;FreyandOsborne,2013),increased
competitionfromrisingeasternmega‐economies(EC,2003;NA,2007)andthecurrent
climateofglobalfinancialinstability(NA,2010).Inthecurrenteconomicclimate,employer
demandscentreonanexpandedskillsset,includingtheapplicationofinterpersonaland
intrapersonalbehaviours,tounderpinthesystemicinnovationrequiredforevenmedium‐
termbusinesscompetitiveness(Stasz,2001;Harvey,2003;Casner‐LottoandBarrington,
2006;Moreland,2007;Finchetal.,2013;SA,2011;NA,2010;CBI,2011;WhitefootandOlson,
2012).
Commentatorshaveplacedtheblameforanemployabilityskillsgapatthefeetofdifferent
stakeholders.Atthenationallevel,Richens(1999)notesthatthestructureofeducation
makesitdifficulttoimplementsystematicchangeevenwhencollaborativeprocessesexist
betweenindustryandeducation.Attheuniversitylevel,highereducationinstitutionshave
failedtoimpartthenecessarybusinessandsoftskillsforgraduateemploymentineconomies
thatareincreasingcomplexandcompetitive(Harvey,2001;Stasz,2001).Atthelevelofthe
curriculum,academicsareuncomfortableteachingskillsbeyondtheirdiscipline‐specific
experience(Barrieetal.,2009;DelaHarpeetal.,2009).Ontheflipside,ithasbeenclaimed
thatemployershavenotcommunicatedtheirskillsrequirementsclearlytothehigher
educationsector(Rosenbergetal.,2012)andthatindustryhasitsownresponsibilitytotrain
graduatesforeachsector(Holmes,2001;Harvey,2001,2005).
Recentreportsalsonotethelackofempiricaldataregardingtherelationshipbetweenskills
andemployment(Masonetal.,2009;PellegrinoandHilton,2012;Rosenbergetal.,2012;
4
Mourshedetal.,2012;Heimleretal.,2012).Graduatesareemployedinnon‐routinework
environments.Thusemploymentandcareertrajectoriesaresimplynotamatterofmatching
skillsrequiredandskillspossessed(Holmes,2001;Harvey,2005;HinchliffeandJolly,2011).
Holmes(2001)paintsthetransitionintotheworkplacefromrecentgraduatetoworthy
employeeasaprocessofdevelopingasharedlanguagebetweenemployeeandemployer
aroundthevalueandapplicationofskillsinthespecificindustry.
PellegrinoandHilton(2012)drawattentiontothelackofasharedmeaningacrossand
betweenstakeholdergroups(academics,industryandstudents)intheirunderstandingof
skills.Inturn,thelackofasharedmeaninghasexacerbatedthelackofengagementamongst
thesegroups(Harvey,2005;PellegrinoandHilton,2012)totheextentthatithasbeen
claimed:“employers,educationprovidersandyouthliveinparalleluniverses”(Mourshedet
al.,2012).Thebiggestchallengerequiringresolutionrelatestothedifferentmeaningsused
byeachstakeholdergrouptodescribeskillsandtheirapplication(PellegrinoandHilton,
2012).Understandinghowskillsaredescribedandappliedinindustryisanimportantstepin
derivingsharedmeaningsbetweenstakeholders.
Tounderstandtheevolvingindustrydemandsaroundgraduateskillsrequiredinan
increasinglyknowledge‐intensiveindustryenvironmentwehavesoughttoassessindustry
expectationsandexperiencesofgraduatesworkinginindustryorganisationsatthefrontof
thetechnologyinnovationcurve.Specifically,ourstudyexaminesperceptionsofthe
employabilityskillsgapthroughtheeyesoftheCEOsandseniormanagersoftheAustralian
innovationandcommercialisationsector.Webreakdownandcontextualisebroadskills
descriptionsintocomponentelementsrelevanttothesectorandapplyaquantitativeand
inductiveexploratoryanalysisoftheperceivedgapbetweenemployers’demandsandwhat
theyseeinnewlyhiredgraduates.Oursurveyexploresskillsinuseattheorganisational
interfaceoftheindividual,theteamandthefirminaknowledge‐intensiveindustryfocused
onbringinginnovationtothemarketplace.Suchinsightsaddtothegreaterskillsdebateby
assessingskillsrequirementsthatwillfilterthroughtootherindustrysectorsovertime.Such
insightsarealsoessentialtothedesignofeducationprogramsinthehighereducationsector
thataddressemployerdemands.
BACKGROUNDTOTHECURRENTGENERICSKILLSFRAMEWORKS
5
Thissectiondoesnotintendtoprovideacomprehensivesurveyofthebroaderemployability
skillsdebateofthelasttwentyyearsbutratherprofilescurrentframeworksandsome
parametersofthedebaterelevanttothispaper.
TheSCANS(1991)reportintheUSlaidthegroundworkforcurrentframeworkswhenit
definedthreefoundationalskills(basicskills,thinkingskills,personalqualities)underpinning
fivecompetencies(useofresources,interpersonalskills,information,systemsand
technology)neededforsolidjobperformance.LordDearingechoedthesesamerequirements
inasubstantialreportthatchangedthelandscapeofhighereducationintheUnitedKingdom
(NCIHE,1997).Fromearlyskillsframeworksthatfocusedprimarilyontechnicalknowledge
andskills,criticalthinkingandcommunication,theSCANSandNCIHEreportsinitiateda
globalshifttowardsincludingskillsinknowledgemanagement,informationliteracy,
teamwork,careermanagementandcitizenshipasessentialforgraduateemployability.
Thecurrentskillsdebatefocusesuponteachingandlearningabroadlydefinedsetof
cognitiveandaffectivecapabilitieslabeledas21stCenturySkillsconsideredtounderpin
careersuccessinknowledgeeconomies.Table1providestherangeofperspectivesamong
skillsframeworksalignedaccordingtothedimensionsadvocatedbyPellegrinoandHilton
(2012)(seebelow).Theexampleshighlightthediversityofapproachesandcommonalities
betweenframeworks.TheglobalAssessmentandTeachingof21stCenturySkills[AT21CS]
projectdefinedfourdomainsofskills:waysofthinking,waysofworking,toolsforworking
andlivingintheworld(Binkleyetal.,2010).InEurope,theOrganisationforEconomic
CooperationandDevelopment[OECD]DefinitionandSelectionofSkillsProgrammedescribes
threeclustersofkeycompetencies(actingautonomously,interactinheterogeneousgroups
andusingtoolsinteractively)thatcanbemobilisedtomeetsocialandeconomicdemandsand
individualgoalsrelatedto21stCenturyworkandliving(OECD,2005).Inthiscontext,the
termcompetencyreferstotheapplicationofknowledgeandskillstomeetcomplexdemands.
BuildingontheConferenceBoardofCanada(CBC,2000)framework,theUnitedKingdom
CommissionforEmploymentandSkills(UKCES)derivedaframeworkthatemphasisesonthe
work‐readinessofgraduates(UKCES,2009).FocusingontheK‐12educationsector,the
Partnershipfor21stCenturySkills[P21CS]emphasizesmasteryofcoresubjectsand
interdisciplinarythemesasunderpinninglearningandinnovationskills,information,media
andtechnologyskills,andlifeandcareerskills(P21CS,2009).
6
*****INSERTTABLE1HERE*****
TherelationshipbetweenHEinstitutesandthelabourmarketiscontextspecificatthe
nationallevel(Tomlinson,2012).Thus,nationalgovernmentsandtheiragencieshave
developedandadoptedavarietyofinitiatives,approachesandpolicyinstrumentsthat
encompassskillsdevelopment(deWeert,2011;KottmannanddeWeert,2013)includingthe
benchmarkingofstudentlearningoutcomes(OECD,1999,2011;Jerald,2008).Forexample,
thehighleveldiscourse(e.g.,NCIHE,1997;DES,2003;Leitch,2006;UKCES,2009)informed
interventionistUKgovernmentpolicybysuccessivegovernmentsthatfacilitatedderegulation
oftheeducationmarket,greaterdisseminationofinformationregardingcareerchoices
(www.nationalcareersservice.direct.gov.uk)andincreasedHE‐industrycollaborationto
addresslabourmarketdemands(DBIS,2011,2013).Collaborativeeffortsinskillstraining
encompasssignificantfundingofprojectsaimedatuniversity‐industrypartnerships
(TallantyreandKettle,2011)andprogrammesdirectedtowardsworkplacementsand
employerownershipofskillstrainingpre‐andpost‐graduation(UKCES,2010,2013,2014).
IntheUSA,wherecurriculumcontentisstate‐controlled,theCommonCoreStateStandards
Initiative(www.corestandards.org)hasredesignedtheEnglishandMathscurriculumto
embodyabroaderviewofknowledgeandskillsrequisiteforworkandlife(NRC,2014).In
Australia,governmentpolicyhasfocusedonthevocationaleducationandtrainingsector
throughthedevelopmentofperformancedefinitionsaroundcoreskills(DEEWR,2008)and
workforceplanning(SA,2011;AWPA,2014)tosupportfutureskillsdemandsofthe
manufacturingindustry.IncontrasttotheUK,thenotionoffundingworkplacementsfor
Australianuniversitystudentshaslargelymetwithgovernmentandindustryinactiondueto
highcostandresourceintensity(Lomax‐Smithetal.,2011;AWPA,2014).
Followingformulationofskillsframeworkscametherealisationthattheassessmentofsoft
skillsanddeeperlearningoutcomesarepoorlydevelopedornon‐existentincurriculum
(Koenig,2011;PellegrinoandHilton,2012).Thissawensuingdevelopmentsalsofollowa
tangentialpathwayinthedevelopmentofprotocolsforskillsmeasurement(Binkleyetal.,
2010;OECD,2011;Koenig,2011;Bladesetal.,2012;Kyllonen,2012)andteachereducation
(Solandetal.,2013;NRC,2014).Sucheffortshavebeenattheexpenseofdevelopingmore
robustsecondandthirdgenerationframeworksbasedonempiricalresearch(Pellegrinoand
Hilton,2012;LaiandViering,2012).
7
PellegrinoandHilton(2012)examinedlistsof21stCenturyskillsandfoundcommonalities
theyproposedfittedthreeover‐archingdomainsofcognitive,interpersonalandintrapersonal
competencies(Table1).Theseauthorsacknowledgeforemosttheskillsineachdomain
support,enhanceorimpingeuponskillsintheotherdomainsandthecomplexrelationships
ofskillsremaintobefullyelucidated.LaiandViering(2012)alsonotethatfewrecognised
skillshavea“relativelyrobustandestablishedresearchbasiswithineducationand
psychology”.PellegrinoandHilton(2012)proposethetripartiteframeworkservesasa
startingpointforresearchthatfurtherdefineseachconstructanditsrelationshiptoother
skillsconstructs.Suchresearchisparamountindefiningtherelationshipbetweenskillsand
employment.
Asthedebateevolves,newskillsarebeingproposedasimportantinthe21stCentury,suchas:
actionorientation,leadership,executivefunction,socialinfluence,assertivecommunication
andserviceorientation(PellegrinoandHilton,2012,andreferencestherein).Animportant
elementisthelackofenterprising(orentrepreneurial)skillsingraduatestosupportbusiness
agility(Gibb,2002;Moreland,2007;SA,2011;NIH,2012;WhitefootandOlson,2012).An
entrepreneurialmindset,especiallyingraduatesofthescience‐basedandtechnical
disciplines,isadvocatedinordertobuildfoundationalplatformsforknowledge‐based
economies(EC,2003;NA,2007,2010;NIH,2012).Suchcallsarerecognitionthatskills
underlyingentrepreneurialactivityareimportantforcareersuccessoftheindividual(Gibb,
2002;NIH,2012;WhitefootandOlson,2012)aswellasbusinessgrowththroughinnovation
thatisbothsystemicandsustainable(Christensen,1997;SA,2011).
Itisimportanttonotethatskillsframeworksoftenreflecttheperceptionsofthegroup,
industry,academicorgovernmentconsultancy,developingtheframework.While
commonalitiesareevident,someimportantdifferencesthatimpactoneducationandtraining
forknowledgeintensiveindustriesremaintoberesolved.Table1servestohighlightthe
contrastingviewpointsoftheroleandvalueofskillsasdisplayedinpublishedskills
frameworks.Thevaryingimportanceplaceduponthebodyofdiscipline‐specificknowledgea
graduateshouldknowrepresentsaninterestingcaseinpoint,especiallywhenyouconsider
suchknowledgerepresentsthecornerstoneofuniversitygraduatecapabilitystatements.
8
TheOECD(2005),UKCES(2009)andAT21CS(Binkleyetal.,2010)emphasisebroadlybased
functionalknowledgeandskillsrelevanttopersonal,socialandeconomicwellbeingrather
thananin‐depthsubjectknowledgethatmayneverbeappliedoncegraduated.Inthese
frameworks,knowledgeasrecallofdisciplinefacts(Bloom,1956;AndersonandKrathwohl,
2001)hastransitionedtothegatheringandprocessingofknowledgesuchthattheessenceof
21stCenturyskillsis“whatstudentscandowithknowledgeratherthanwhatunitsof
knowledgetheyhave”(Silva,2008).Theoutcomeofthisperspectivehasknowledge,asa
construct,describedsomewhatnarrowlyasinformationliteracy(definedasevidence‐based
researchandbiasrecognition)andliteracyininformationandcommunicationstechnology
[ICT](AnaniadouandClaro,2009;PellegrinoandHilton,2012).
Otherframeworks,however,featuretheimportanceofdiscipline‐specificknowledge.The
P21skillsframeworkemphasisesa“focusonmasteryofcoreknowledgeandunderstanding
academiccontentathigherlevels”(P21CS,2009).Indeed,empiricalresearchshowscritical
thinking,afundamentalcognitiveskillandessentialgraduateattribute,isadomainspecific
constructthatevolvesasthepersonacquiresdiscipline‐basedknowledge(Kuncel,2011;Lai
andViering,2012).
Employersurveysarealsoequivocalabouttheroleofdiscipline‐specificknowledge.
Technicalskillsrank11thintheNACE(2013)survey;whileanothersurveyhasmathematics
andscienceranked15thand16th,respectively,outof20skills(Casner‐LottoandBarrington,
2006).HarveyandMason(1996)report38%ofemployersconsiderknowledgeoflittleorno
importance,andsuggestashortshelflifeasthecause.Othersurveysreported,however,that
employersfavouredbothabroadrangeofwidelyapplicableskillsandknowledge,andin
depthtechnicalskillsandknowledgeinoneormoredisciplines(Saflund,2007;HRA,2010).
Withintheskillsmix,Saflund(2007)andRosenbergetal.(2012)reportemployercomments
thatitiseasiertoremedyalackoftechnicalknowledgethanadeficiencyinsoftskills.
Pointingtoapartialsolution,theNACE(2013)surveynotesthatemployersimposea
thresholdGPAwhenhiringgraduates,thisimpliesaperformancecriterionfordiscipline
knowledgedespitealowrankingoftechnicalskills.Thus,“employersview21stCenturyskills
asanadditiontocore(discipline)knowledge”(HoustoncitedinHilton,2010)and,implicitly,
graduates’technicalknowledgeisassumed(Saflund,2007).
9
Leadershipisaskillratedasveryimportantbyindustryand,yet,ithasnotfeaturedinskills
frameworks.PellegrinoandHilton(2012)describeleadershipasaninterpersonalskill
encompassingleadership,responsibility,assertivecommunication,self‐presentationand
socialinfluencewithothers.Ontheotherhand,Casner‐LottoandBarrington(2006)provide
industry‐centrictermstodescribetheconceptofleadershipasanappliedskillthat“leverages
thestrengthsofotherstoachievecommongoals”andastheuseof“interpersonalskillsto
coachanddevelopothers”.Leadershipranked10th(outof20skills)with~82%ofindustry
regardingtheskillas‘veryimportant’innewworkforceentrants(Casner‐Lottoand
Barrington,2006).Moreover,NACE(2013)rankedleadershipas2ndonalistofdesired
attributesandreports76%ofindustryseekevidenceofleadershipskillsongraduates’
résumés.MillennialBranding(2012)reportsthat50%ofcompaniesarelookingfor
leadershipskillsinnewgraduates.Anyperceivedleadershipdeficitingraduatesarisesfrom
theirlackoffamiliaritywithbusinessandcorporatecultures(Casner‐LottoandBarrington,
2006).AMcKinseymeta‐surveyofUSindustryreportsthatemployersarealreadyfinding
managementpositionsdifficulttofill(Manyikaetal.,2011),asentimentalsoexpressedinan
Australiansurvey(AIM,2009).Withagenerationalshiftbroughtonbyretirementofthe
babyboomergeneration,theimpactofaleadershipskillsdeficitonorganisationswillbecome
moreovertovertime.
Whilethediversityofstakeholdersinputintotheemployabilityskillsdebateishealthy,the
broadbaseofdiscoursehascontributedtoalackofsharedmeaningacrossandwithin
stakeholdergroups.Inturn,thelackofasharedmeaninghasexacerbatedthelackof
engagementamongstthesegroups(Harvey,2005;PellegrinoandHilton,2012).Thebiggest
challengerequiringresolutionrelatestothedifferentmeaningsusedbyeachstakeholder
grouptodescribeskillsandtheirapplication(PellegrinoandHilton,2012).Understanding
howskillsaredescribedandappliedinindustryisthefirststepinderivingsharedmeanings
betweenstakeholders.
BACKGROUNDTOTHEINNOVATIONANDCOMMERCIALISATIONINDUSTRY
Focusedonbringingcomplexemergenttechnologytothemarketplace,theinnovationand
commercialisationsectorisahighprofileindustrysectorwithsignificantinfluenceonfuture
healthofnationaleconomies(Christensen,1997;Wrightetal.,2007;Meyeretal.,2011).A
conceptualframeworkdisplayingthetypesoforganisationsintheinnovationand
10
commercialisationinfrastructureispresentedinFigure1.Thefigureprovidesanoverviewof
thevaluechainandthediversityofcontributorstothatchain,rangingfromresearchtosales
andmarketing,andincludesfundingagencies,lawyersandbusinessdevelopmentspecialists.
Thediversityofcontributorsunderscoresthenetworkednatureoftheinnovationand
commercialisationinfrastructure.Thesectorishighlydependentontechnicalknowledgeand
skills.Successintheindustryisdependentnotjustontheinherentnoveltyandutilityofthe
innovationbutontheabilitytoselltheinnovationinamarketpopulatedwithcompeting
technologiesorservices.Thesectordemandshighlyqualifiedgraduatesrepletewith
technicalmastery(definedassuccessinresearch(MacKinnonetal.,2010))andimbuedwitha
suiteofentrepreneurialandgenericskillsfocusedonacommercialimperative(Murrayand
Hsi,2007a,b,citedinHilton,2008).Furthermore,noonepersonmaymanagethepipeline
fromstarttofinishandthusplayersintheindustrymustalsohaveanappreciationoftheir
roleintheprocessaswellastherolesandapproachesofothercontributingdisciplines.Toa
largedegree,thehumancapitalneedsofthesectorcanbeconsideredattheforefrontof
emergingskillsrequirementsofknowledge‐basedindustries(Wrightetal.,2007;Phanetal.,
2009;Austinetal.,2009).
RESEARCHDESIGNANDMETHODOLOGY
ThenamesoftargetAustralianorganisations,theappropriatepersonnelandtheircontact
details,werecollectedthroughinternetsearchesofgovernmentandprivatedirectoriesof
research,developmentandcommercialisationorganisationsandthroughsearchtermssuch
as‘technologytransfer’,‘researchcommercialisation’,‘technologycommercialisation’,
‘intellectualproperty’andvariationsthereof.Theorganisationstargetedareknowledge‐
intensiveinnovationindustriesandtheadjunctstotheseindustries,andthusmaynotbe
representativeofthecommercialisationpipelinebutratherrepresentativeoftheinnovation
andcommercialisationpipeline(Figure1;Table2).AstheindustryinAustraliaissmall,the
surveywasundertakenbytelephoneinterviewtoimproveresponserates.
*****INSERTFIGURE1HERE*****
*****INSERTTABLE2HERE*****
Alistofskillswasdrawnfromabroadsweepacrossdisciplinesandreportsfromacademic,
industry,governmentandpolicyareas.Sourcesofskillslistsencompassedgenericand
11
specificcompetencesofmultipledisciplineswithintheEuropeanUnionTuningProject
(www.unideusto.org/tuningeu/competences)includingthesocialsciences(business,nursing
andhistory)andnaturalsciences(physics,chemistry,earthsciences);skillsandcompetencies
fromgovernmentandthink‐tankreports(suchasDETYA,1998;DEST,2002,2007);academic
literatureincludingthatcoveringentrepreneurship(suchasGartnerandVesper,1994;Gibb,
2002;McLeish,2002);andthegraduatecapabilitieslistsofanumberofAustralian
universities,werealsopartitionedintoindividualskilltraits.Skillswereanalysedthrough
identificationofoverlappingitemsandcorethemesfromthepublishedlists.Ourfinallistof
skillswasnotmeanttobeexhaustivegiventherapidevolutionofthegenericskillsdebate,
howevertheaimwastoprovidebroadcoverageoftheskillspresentinpublishedlists.
Leveragingtheextensiveexperienceofthetworesearchers,eachskillwasanalysedfor
contextualrelevancewithintheknowledgehierarchyoftheinnovationand
commercialisationindustryandacrossthebroadrepresentationofthevaluechain(Figure1).
Forinstance,informationliteracyisregardedasacoreskill,butwhatdoesthismean?
Definitionsintheliteratureprovidethatinformationliteracyisthecollectionofinformation
fromadiversearrayofsources,oftenusingmoderntechnologies(PellegrinoandHilton,
2012).Inthecontextof(modern)knowledge‐intensiveindustries,informationhasvalue,so
itisnotjustthecollectionofinformationthatisimportant,butalsohowinformationis
evaluated,assimilated,shared,andnewknowledgecreatedandleveragedwithinthefirm.In
thisparticularindustry,whereinnovationleadstoanewproductandintellectualproperty
protectionisanimportantaspectofthebusinessfunction,thedocumentationofthe
informationsourceandaccuratereportingofinformationarealsokeyelementsofthe
innovationprocess.
Asoutlinedinthepreviousparagraph,finalskillsitemswerederivedbasedonmanifestation
of,orrequirementfor,eachspecificskillintheinnovationandcommercialisationcontextand
consideredasgermanetotheindustry(Table4).Incontrasttomostindustrysurveys,the
researchdesignwechoseusedalargernumberofskillsitemsandapplications(>50)rather
thanasmallnumberofskillsitems(<15)toavoidthecompoundingissuesarisingfrom
assumingasharedlanguagethatdescribestheskillandinfersitsapplicationinindustry(see
above).Thisalsoprovidedamuchmorenuanceddataset.
12
Throughthesurveyweaimedtoevaluatethegapbetweentheskillsperceivedasrequiredby
industryandthoseperceivedasevidentingraduatesenteringtheindustry.Thus,eachofthe
61skillsitemsincludedtwoquestions:
Howimportant(IMP)istheskilltoyourorganisation?
Howevident(EVD)istheskillinthegraduatesyouemploy?
ThequestionnairedesignincludedaLikert5‐pointscalewithnoneutralpointtoavoid
courtesybiasonthepartofrespondentsandeliminateambivalence.Thesurveyalsoincluded
questionsthataddressedthedemographicsofrespondents’organisation,andthecredentials
oftherespondentandrecentlyemployedpersonnel.
Fromtheviewpointoftherespondent,therelativeimportanceofanyoneskillinbusiness
activityisevaluatedincomparisontoasuiteofotherskills.Therespondentisexplicitly
awareofthisprocessofthesurveyandrankstheskillsaccordingly.Inreviewingskills
evidentinthegraduate,however,therespondentisnotengagedinacomparativeranking;the
personisexplicitlyprovidingavaluejudgementaboutaperceiveddistancemeasure
(deficiency)thatimplicitlyprovidesanindependentmeasureoftheimportanceoftheskillin
therespondent’sactivities.Forthisreason,itisthedistancebetweenthemeansofIMPand
EVDthatprovidesmeaningfulmeasuresofskillsimportance(i.e.,IMPmeanminusEVDmeanasa
variableinitself),anditisthetestofthisdistancethatisthefocusofthisstudy.Inusingthe
subtractivedifferencebetweenthemeasuresofperceivedimportanceandevidence,wehave
soughttooperationaliseissuesofconcernaroundtheemployabilityskillsgapinthissector.
TheanalysisofresponsesutilisedSPSSv21.Ananalyticaliterativeprogressionwasfollowed
withdatatransformationandinterpretationasfollows:(1)one‐tailedt‐testsofsignificance,
withBonferronicorrectiontoallowforinflatedfamilywiseTypeIerrorrate(for61items,α=
0.00082;Field,2013),onthedifferencebetweenthemeansofIMPandEVD(testingμIMP>
μEVD),(2)testsofsizeeffectusingCohen’sdtest,and(3)classificationoftheIMPmean–
EVDmeanitemsintoconstructs(skillfields)usingfirstorderandsecondorderexploratory
factoranalysis(EFA).Kaiser‐Meyer‐Olkin(KMO)testsandBartlett’sTestofSphericitywere
usedtoevaluatethelinearassociationofitemsincorrelationmatrices.Constructswere
extractedusingprincipalcomponentanalysis(PCA)withPromaxrotation,toallowfor
correlationbetweenvariables,andKaisernormalisation(Field,2013).Internalconsistencyof
constructvaliditywasexaminedusingCronbach’sαcoefficient(Reinard,2006;Field,2013).
13
RESULTS
RespondentCharacteristics
Thesurveyrealised207responsesfromindustrypersonnelataresponserateof45%with
94.2%ofrespondentsrepresentingsenior‐levelmanagement:middle(25.1%)andupper
level(seniormanager:36.7%;CEO32.4%).Foursectorsdominatedtheindustrygroups
makingup88%oftherespondents:healthandcommunityservices(20%),propertyand
businessservices(20%),agriculture,forestryandfishing(22%)andamiscellaneousgroup
(various)(26%).Mining,manufacturing,governmentadministrationanddefence,utilities
andcommunicationserviceswereallatorbelow4%.Themajority(70%)ofindustry
organisationswereunder40yearsofagewith55%lessthan20yearsoldandoverhalfofthe
organisationsemployedupto100employeesandallhadlessthan2000employees.Asone
wouldexpect,thegeographicfocusoftheorganisationswaspredominantlyinternational
(49.8%)ornational(39.6%)withfewhavingaregional(8.2%)orlocal(2.4%)focus.
Thesurveyrespondentsrepresentahighlycredentialedpopulationofindividuals:42%hada
highestqualificationofaPhD,23.5%hadamaster’sdegreeand34%graduatedwitha
bachelor’sdegree(includingHonours).Oftheemployeeshiredbytheorganisationsinthe
lastthreeyears,themajority(83.8%)ofemployeeswererecentgraduates(37.3%)orhad
graduatedlessthanayearbeforehand(14.1%)orwerepreviouslyemployedgraduates
(32.4%).Non‐graduatesaccountedforonly16.2%ofrecentemployees.Alargepercentageof
graduatesemployedhadthehigher‐levelqualificationsofmaster’sdegree(12.9)orPhD
(31.6)and42%hadabachelor’sdegree.Thehighproportionofgraduateswithpost‐
bachelor’sdegrees(44.5%)supportsthenotionofanindustryrequirementforanadvanced
knowledgeandskillsbase.
AnEmployabilitySkillsGap
Atthesimplestlevel,thesurveysoughttotesttheemployers’perceptionsofaskillsgap
betweentheskillsindemand(i.e.,IMP)intheinnovationandcommercialisationsectorand
theskillslevelevidentingraduateemployees.TheaverageIMPmean=3.6comparedwiththe
averageEVDmean=2.78.Foreachofthe61items,theIMPmeanresponsewassignificantly
higherthantheEVDmean(Table3;p/2<0.001;onetailedt‐testwithBonferronicorrection).
Cohen’sdeffectsizesofmediumorlarger(>0.5)wereobtainedfor59itemswithsmallto
medium(0.320and0.456)effectsizesachievedfortwoitems.Thissuggestsasignificantand
14
meaningfulgapisperceivedbetweentheskillsconsideredessentialforindustry
activity/successandthoseevidentinrecentgraduates.
*****INSERTTABLE3HERE*****
DerivationofSkillsConstructsandDescription
TheKMOstatistic(0.924)indicatesthesamplesizeissufficientforthenumberofitemsinour
scalewhiletheBartlett’stest(χ2=8347,df=1830,p<0.001)indicatesthecorrelationmatrix
isnotanidentitymatrix(Field,2013).Togetherthesetwotestsindicateourcorrelation
matrixissuitableforfactoranalysis.Tenconstructs,eachwithEigenvaluesof>1,were
extractedusingfirstorderEFAbasedonIMPmean–EVDmeanforthe61itemsthattogether
explained63.5%ofthevariance(Table3).Cronbachαvaluesexceed0.7forallfactors,
includingfactorswithnine,10and15variables(at0.880,0.905and0.911,respectively),
indicatingahighlevelofinternalreliabilityinthefactoroutcomes.
Table3showsalignmentofskillsitemsineachofthe10extractedconstructsanddescribes
thelabelsappliedtoconstructs:
Knowledge/Learningconstructprojectsanoutcomesfocusrelatingtotheprocessof
individuallearningandalsotheleverageofinformationandknowledgeinan
organisationalsenseinwaysthatcontributetointellectualcapitalandaddvalueto
companies.Anunderstandingofthetechnicaldisciplineandthetwoway
communicationwithspecialistsisparamounttobothunderstandingtheneedsofthe
companyandaccuratelyimpartingknowledgeregardingexternaldevelopments.Such
activitiesareimportantinknowledgeintensiveindustriesformaintainingsustainable
competitiveadvantage(WangandNoe,2010).
EnterpriseLeadershiprecognisesacoalescenceofhigherorderactions,attitudesand
personalitiesthatarenecessarytoprogressnewventures(BassandBass,2008).Inan
organisationalsense,knowledgeofadministrativesystemswouldplayanimportant
roleinachievingpositiveoutcomes.
BusinessFunctionrelatestosystemsthinkingandcomprisesacoreofbusiness
knowledgerelatingtoelementalfunctioningofanybusinessentity.
TechnicalManagementrecognisesthatcareersinthisindustrybuildonafoundationof
disciplineknowledgeandtechnicalmasterytoincludehigherorderskillsapplication
andleadershipinaprojectcontextthatisclientfocused.
15
TeamWorkerrecognisesasuiteofinward‐focusingskillsthatareimportantindividual
pre‐requisitesthatcontributetotheeffectiveperformanceofateam.
InterprofessionalCollaborationisoutwards‐focusedandrecognisesasuiteofskillsthat
coalescearoundactivecollaborationandcommunicationwithotherprofessionalsin
interdisciplinaryteamenvironments.Thisconstructrecognisestheneedforthefirm
tointeractthroughcomplexrelationshipsinvolvingmultipleentitiesinthevaluechain
(Figure1).
LeadershipAntecedencecomprisesskillsconsideredenterprisinginnatureandthat
contributetotheperformancedynamicsofboththeindividualand,through
communication,thefirm(Gibb,2002).
Improvecomprisesskillsrelatingtolifelonglearning.Theconstructcontainsonlytwo
items,butnonetheless,wasnotdiscardedastheEigenvaluewasabove1,theitemsare
welldefinedandtheconstituentitemsintuitivelycluster.
Progresscomprisesasuiteofskillsthatrecognisestheprocessofpickingapotentially
winningtechnologyandprogressingthetechnologythroughtoaproduct(i.e.,
innovationtransformation)(Wrightetal.,2007,andreferencestherein).
Createreflectsafocusedpracticeoftheindividualtocreatenewknowledge.The
sharingofnewknowledge,however,alignsintheconstructKnowledge/Learning,
whichmayunderscoretheimportanceofknowledgemanagementwithinthefirm.Our
constructsdistinguishbetweenknowledgegathering,filteringandleveragewithinthe
firm(Knowledge/Learning)versusbuildingnewknowledge(Create)andthusreflect
theclassiccognitivecategoriesofEvaluation(orEvaluating)andSynthesis(or
Creating),respectively,asdefinedbyBloom(1956)andAndersonandKrathwohl
(2001).
DerivationandDescriptionofMetaconstructs
Toexaminerelationshipsbetweentheconstructfields,asecondroundofEFAwas
undertakenusingthe10constructsasvariables.TheKMOstatistic(0.917)andBartlett’stest
(χ2=1201,df=45,p<0.001)indicatethematrixisfactorable.Principalcomponentanalysis
realisedtwometaconstructswithEigenvalues>1thatexplain68%ofthetotalvariance
(Table4).While21stCenturyskillsframeworksrecognisethreeclustersofskills:cognitive,
interpersonalandintrapersonal(PellegrinoandHilton,2012),suchdistinctionsappearnotto
berecognisedintheseend‐userdemandresponses.Rather,thetwometaconstructs
16
essentiallyprescribedomainsoffunctionoftheindividualinanorganisationalcontextinthis
specificindustrysector.
*****INSERTTABLE4HERE*****
OrganisationalFitcomprisesskillsconstructsthatrepresenta(basal)scopeandlevelof
knowledgeandskillsrequiredofemployeestoworkinthecurrentandeverchanging
businessstructuresandstrategiesofinnovationandcommercialisationorganisations.When
consideredasawhole,theskillsfieldsthatresolveinthismetaconstructdescribethe
individual’sfitintoanorganisation’sstructure,strategyandculture.Ontheotherhand,the
metaconstructOrganisationalSuccessdescribeshigherorderskillsassociatedwitha
successfulcareerinthesector,reflectingrespondentperceptions,andinevitablysome
respondentbias.Thelattermetaconstructisbasedonexperientiallearning,buildingupon,
ratherthanderivedfrom,explicitinstruction.Graduatesentertheindustrysectoras
technicalexpertsandusuallylearntheirbasicbusinessandmanagementskillsastheyrise
throughtheranksoftheorganisationaswellasgaintheexperientialknowledgeneededto
progressnewtechnologiesintoproducts(Pisano,1994).
DISCUSSIONANDCONCLUSIONS
TheEmployabilitySkillsGap
Aperceptionofadeficiencyingraduateskillsimpliesthatindustryconsidersitcandobetter,
andmaybebeingheldbackbygraduatesinitspursuitofproductivity(Packer,1993).
Conversely,perceptionsthatgraduateskillsexceedrequirementsmeansthatindustrydonot
utilisetheskillsoftheiremployeesandthisrepresentsanunusedcapacitywithinthe
organisation.Insurveyingindustrywithanextendedlistofskillswelookedtoassess
whethergraduatespossessedindividualelementsaroundabroadskilldescription(e.g.,
teamwork,problem‐solving)thatmetindustryexpectations.Inthisknowledgeintensive
industrysector,theperceptionsoftheimportanceofall61skillsitems(asdefinedby
IMPmean)issignificantlyhigher(P<0.001)thanperceivedasevident(EVDmean)ingraduates.
Ourresultsempiricallyconfirmtheconcernsregardingthedeficiencyinskillsbetween
graduateexitandemployerrequirementsthathavebeenvoicedoverthelast20yearsin
policydebateanddescriptivesurveysoftheUS(e.g.,SCANS1991;Casner‐Lottoand
Barrington,2006;Saflund,2007;NACE,2013),UK(HarveyandMason,1996;NCIHE,1997;
17
Harvey,2003;CBI2011)andAustralian(DETYA,1998;DEST,2002,2007;AIM,2009;SA,
2011)workforcecontexts.Beyondthis,ouranalysishascategorisedtheskillssothatthey
canbebetterunderstoodforthepurposeofchangeandredesignofcurriculuminthehigher
educationsector.
SkillsfromaDemandPerspective
Ratherthanascribeimportancetoitemsinalistofskills,wefocusedonthedifference
betweenskillsimportancetotheorganisationandskillsevidentingraduatesasperceivedby
theemployerasameasureoftheemployabilityskillsgap.Asascaledevelopmenttechnique,
thisapproachmirrorsimplementationoftheconsumer‐basedExpectation‐Confirmation
Model(PoisterandClaytonThomas,2011)andtheuseofSERVQUALinresearchingservice
quality(Ladhari,2009).Inourscalewearenotconsideringtheindividualgraduatebut
rathertheexperientialperceptionofwhatgraduatesasacohortbringtotheorganisationand
whatskillsareimportanttoeachorganisation.Thus,ourresultsreflectaninterpretationof
skillsbyahighlycredentialedandsuccessfulbusinesscohortinanindustrythatleverages
knowledgeandinnovationforcommercialoutcomesandliesattheforefrontofinnovation
andtechnologymanagement.Bypopulatingthesurveywithanextendedlistofskills
contextualisedfortheindustry,wehavesoughttoovercomethelimitationsofanassumed
language(Mourshedetal.,2012;PellegrinoandHilton,2012).Ourstudydoesnotpre‐empt
thecomplexrelationshipsbetweenskills(PellegrinoandHilton,2012;LaiandViering,2012)
butseekstodrawrelationshipsaroundinterpretationthroughexploratoryfactoranalysis.
OfthetenskillsconstructsderivedfromfirstorderEFA,eightmaptothethreebroadclusters
recognisedbyPellegrinoandHilton(2012):cognitivecompetencies(Knowledge/Learning,
Create,BusinessFunction,TechnicalManagement,Progress),interpersonalcompetencies
(Interprofessionalism)andintrapersonalcompetencies(TeamWorker,Improve)(Table1).In
contrast,twoconstructscontainelementsthatspancompetencydomains.Leadership
Antecedencefeaturesbothinterpersonalandintrapersonalskillsandrecognisesthatcareers
inthissectorrequirehighmotivationaldriversandwell‐developedcommunicationskills.
EnterpriseLeadershipcontainselementsthatspanallthreedomainsofcompetencyand
recognisesthatsuccessfulnewventuresareattheheartofthisindustrysector.Both
constructsfeaturetraitsconsideredentrepreneurialorenterprising(GartnerandVesper,
1994;LumpkinandDess,1996;Gibb,2002).Althoughthesectorisconsideredhighly
entrepreneurial,‘entrepreneurship’asaconstructwasnotresolved.Theseoutcomesmay
18
reflectapervasivenessofenterprisingbehavioursacrossthesectorratherthan
entrepreneurshipperse‐beingentrepreneurialisalesserrequirementthanbeingan
entrepreneur(Gibb,2002).
Ourexploratoryfactoranalysisalsoprovidesforfurtherdiscussionofthreeelementsofthe
employabilityskillsdebatearoundknowledge,teamwork/collaborationandleadership.
Furthermore,andnotsurprisinglyfromanindustryviewpoint,ourskillsconstructsand
metaconstructsinferanemphasisonoutcomesandperformanceratherthanpresenta
processorientedviewcharacteristicofcurriculum.
TheRoleandValueofKnowledge
KnowledgeasdefinedinthenarrowsenseasinformationliteracyandICTliteracy(Silva,
2008;PellegrinoandHilton,2012)orinthebroadfunctionalsensewithinthecontextof
everydaytasks(OECD,2005;Binkleyetal.,2010)seemsinadequatewhenweconsiderour
constructs.Incontrasttotheequivocalroleofcontentknowledgethatfeaturesinthe
employabilityskillsdiscourse,discipline‐specificknowledgederivedfromexplicittraining
featuresintwoofourconstructs:KnowledgeandTechnicalManagement.Technical
knowledgeservesasbothaprerequisiteforindividualandfirm‐centredlearninginthe
cognitiveprocessofinformationevaluation,synthesisanddisseminationaswellasthe
applicationofcriticalthinkingskills(Knowledge).Buildinguponthebaseofdiscipline
knowledgeandtechnicalmastery,successfulcareersinthisindustryincludehigherorder
skillsofleadershipandmanagementthatarederivedexperientially(TechnicalManagement).
Leadersinthesectorareusuallyhighlycredentialedandtheindustryfocusisonthe
applicationof,andvalue‐addingto,deepknowledgeofatechnicaldisciplinetowards
developingaviablecommercialproductforthemarketplace.Suchanoutcomesupportsthe
notionthatdisciplinaryknowledgeisbothvaluedbyindustryandassumedforgraduates
(Saflund,2007;Hilton2010).
Ontheotherhand,theimportanceofexperientialknowledgeintheinnovationand
commercialisationsectorisacknowledgedbyresolutionoftwoconstructs:BusinessFunction
andProgress.BusinessFunctioncoversrequisiteknowledgeforunderstandingandeffecting
commercialoperations.Progressrelates,atfirstglance,toknowledgerequisiteforcareer
successinthespecificindustrysectorsurveyed,howeveritcanbearguedthattheskills
constructappliestoanyknowledge‐intensivesectorseekingsustainabilitythroughsystemic
19
innovation(Christensen,1997;Wrightetal.,2007).ItisalsonotsurprisingthatBusiness
FunctionandProgressresolveinthemetaconstructOrganisationalSuccessinthissector.Ata
seniormanagementlevel,organisationaltransformationandviabilityisdependenton
businesssystemsthinkingandtheexperientiallearningderivedfromplotting
commercialisationpathwaysforcomplextechnologicalinnovation(Pisano,1994).
TeamworkversusInterprofessionalCollaboration
Ourconstructshighlightadistinctionbetweenthetraditionaldescriptionsofteamwork
versuscollaboration.Teamworkisatopiccentraltoskillsframeworksanddescriptionsoften
include‘abilitytoworkingroups’,‘workingtogetherforcollaborativelearning’and‘division
oflabour’(LaiandViering,2012,andreferencestherein).Theelementscoalescinginthe
constructTeamWorkerrepresentintrapersonalskillsthatcontributetotheeffective
performanceofateam.OurconstructInterprofessionalCollaboration,however,comprises
interpersonalskillsandextendsbeyondteamworktoencompassaninterdisciplinary
environmentthatincludesinteractingwithothers,professionalsandnon‐professionalsalike,
whichfacilitatespositiveorganisationaloutcomes.Theconstructalsoindicatesaservice
orientationthatiscentraltothisindustrysectorwherecomplextechnologicalinnovationhas
tobedemystifiedandsoldtonon‐expertssuchasventurecapitalistsandotherinvestors,
lawyers,financialmanagersandend‐users.Resolutionofaconstructemphasising
interprofessionalcollaborationismostlikelydrivenbythecomplexrelationshipsand
diversifiednatureoftheorganisationsoperatingalongthevaluechainoftheindustrysector
wherealliances,andlicencingisparamount,andnegotiationisamajorbusinesstoolfor
royalties,annuitiesandreturns.Together,theconstructsrepresenttwosidesofthesame
coin.
Ourresultsmakethedistinctionbetweenbringingknowledgetoateamorfirm(i.e.,
multidisciplinarity)andlearninginprofessionalcontextsthatleadstointerdisciplinarity.
Interprofessionalismisdefinedasanapproachtoworkinginteamsthatemphasiseshighly
collaborativeproblemsolvingwheredifferentprofessionslearnwith,fromandabouteach
othertoimproveoutcomes(Barr,1997;Bromage,2009).Consideredanimportantaspectof
healthcaretrainingsincethe1950s,interprofessionalismhasalsobeenrecognisedasa
phenomenonrelevanttooneofthemostinterdisciplinaryofknowledge‐intensiveindustries,
biotechnology(MacKinnonetal.,2010).Inthishightechnologysector,wheretheproduct
developmentpipelinecantypicallystretchto15years,innovationandcommercialisation
20
requirescontributionfromavarietyofprofessionsincludingscientists,technicalexperts,
engineers,intellectualpropertylawyers,businessconsultants,venturecapitalistsand
entrepreneurialmanagers(Figure1).Inthemedicalandalliedhealthprofessions,theterm
interprofessionalismencompassesbothknowledgeacquisitionandleverage,and
collaborationbetweenprofessionstoimproveoutcomes(e.g.,Hammicketal.,2007).Inour
study,however,skillsrelatingtoacquiring,applyingandleveraginginformationand
knowledgeinthisindustrysectoralignwithinotherconstructs.Thus,theperceptionsofthe
innovationandcommercialisationindustrysupportadivideinactualorganisationalpractice
betweentheroleandapplicationofknowledgeandinterprofessionalism(asadaptive
behaviours)toachievepositiveoutcomes.Ineffect,theconceptsofteamworkand
interprofessionalismaremorerobustthanisusuallyconceptualisedincurriculum(Hammick
etal.,2007;Riebeetal.,2010)astheyaregivenmeaningandpurposeinaction.
Leadership
Althoughleadershiphasonlyrecentlyfeaturedinskillsframeworks,keyleadershipskills
featureinourconstructs:LeadershipAntecedence,EnterpriseLeadershipandTechnical
Management.Suchconstructsareintuitiveforanindustrysectorchargedwithbringing
technologicalinnovationthroughR&Dandcommercialisationtothemarketplace.The
importanceofleadershipalsoemergesfromthesecondorderEFAwherefourskills
constructscoalescetoformthemetaconstructOrganisationalSuccessthatrepresents
leadershipandexperienceasenablersofsuccessofboththeorganisationandtheindividual.
TheelementsinOrganisationalSuccessrepresenthigherorderappliedskillsinmanagement,
evaluationandprogressionofintellectualcapitalandorganisations.Theemphasison
leadershipinoursurveyoutcomesundoubtedlyreflectsboththedemographyoftheindustry
respondentsasseniorlevelmanagers,whohavealreadybeenselectedbasedontheirown
leadershipskills.Nonetheless,theemphasisonleadershipskillsinourresultshighlightsa
dimensionofincreasingimportanceinthecurrentskillsdebateasorganisationslearnto
harnesstheeducationandskillsofemployeestoachievetheirownorganisationalgoals.
GraduateSkillsDeficienciesTranslateasIndustryRequirementsforPerformance
Overall,ourexploratoryanalysissuggeststhattheindustry’sperceptionofskillsfavoursan
outcomesfocusdrivenbythecommercialimperativeratherthantheprocessorientation
oftencharacteristicofcurriculum.TheoutcomesfocusisreinforcedinsecondorderEFA
wheretheskillsconstructsderivedfromfirstorderanalysiscoalesceintwometaconstructs
21
thatcentreonorganisationalpurpose.Theshiftofunderstandingskillsfromaprocess
(curriculum)perspectivetoanoutcomesfocusaroundorganisationalfitandsuccessalso
suggestsindividualperformanceisacorethemeinknowledge‐intensivebusinessesoperating
inaglobalisedeconomywherecapacitytodriveinnovationisthemajorcompetitive
advantage.Indeed,performanceemergesasaninherentthemeintheskillsclassification
derivedinthisstudy.Whiletheacademicdiscoursefocusesonmeans,theindustryfocusis
moreeconomicallypragmatic,placingemphasisonindividualperformancetoaddressthe
commercialimperative(i.e.,focusedonends).HinchliffeandJolly(2011)alsoreportthat
employersperceiveperformance,interpretedasdeliveryandresults,asakeycomponentof
graduatetransitionintotheworkforce.Inthisregard,(applied)performanceinthe
workplaceisdistinctfromacademiccapacityinHEIenvironments.
Implications
Ourstudyprovidesinsightintothevalueofskillsandtheirapplicationfromtheperspectiveof
thefirm.Thebroaderstakeholderunderstandingofasharedlanguagecanassistgraduate
employabilityoutcomes(PellegrinoandHilton,2012;Mourshedetal.,2012).Incontrastto
theheterogeneousnatureofmostindustrysurveys,wesampledahomogeneousindustry,the
innovationandcommercialisationsector,andassuchtheskillsrequirementsand
interpretationsrepresentanarrowrangeofresponses.However,theimportanceoffit,
successandperformancedirectlyreflectthoseconcernswitnessedinindustrysurveys
regardingemployabilityskillsrequirements(Harvey,2003,2005;Casner‐Lottoand
Barrington,2006;Saflund,2007;NACE,2013)andwhereindustryhasvoicedconcernsin
thinktankreports(e.g.,Hilton,2008,2010;PellegrinoandHilton,2012).Thusthe
imperativesoftheinnovationandcommercialisationindustrycouldbeconsidered
representativeofknowledge‐intensiveindustriesingeneral(PellegrinoandHilton,2012;
Mourshedetal.,2012).
Intheinnovationandcommercialisationsector,employersviewgraduateskillsfromthe
perspectiveoforganisationalfit.Fitinthiscontextisdependentonthecognitive(knowledge)
andpersonalskillsthatsupportthecompetitivenessandmarketadvantageofthefirm.In
turn,organisationalfitpromotesthesuccessoftheindividualandthefirm.Thus,discourse
aroundemployabilityshouldshiftfrominstilling(listsof)skillsperseinstudentstoenabling
graduatestoperform,competentlyandeffectively,post‐universitytomeetadiversityof
workplacecontextsandcommercialexpectationscentredonorganisationalpurpose.
22
Intransitiontocareers,workintegratedlearninghasassistedinpromotingindustryfocused
learningenvironmentstostudents(Peggetal.,2012).Howeverourfindingssuggestmore
needstobedonetonarrowtheskillsgapandteachtheemployabilityskillstocreatethe
industryreadygraduatesdemandedbyknowledge‐intensiveindustries.Skillssuchas
leadership(Peggetal.,2012),interprofessionalcollaboration(Taajamaaetal.,2014),systems
thinking(Remington‐Doucetteetal.,2012),informationleverage(WrigleyandBucolo,2011)
andserviceorientation(SwapandWayland,2013)areoftenlearnedfromtheviewpointof
isolatedsubjectsorco‐curricularactivitieswithsuchskillspoorlyintegratedintothe
mainstreamcurriculum.Forknowledge‐intensiveindustries,however,wearguethatall
graduatesalsorequireanunderstandingofthecommercialimperative.
Howthencancurriculumberedesignedtoaddresstheaddedskillsperspectivespointedtoby
thisstudy?Currentprogramscannotaffordtosacrificedisciplinaryknowledge,ascore
technicalknowledgeremainstheparamountconsiderationofemployersinsuchindustries.
Thedemandfortechnicalknowledgeislikelytoincreaseasthemergingofdistinctdisciplines
–theconvergenceparadigm–continuestoaccelerateandfuelinnovationandindustrial
evolution(MIT,2011).Ratherthanfluencyinonediscipline,knowledge‐intensiveindustries
willbeseekingtechnicalknowledgeinmultipledisciplinestoaddresscomplex‐problem
solvinganddecision‐makingprocesses.Thissentimenthasalreadybeenrecordedinasurvey
offirmsoperatingintheITsectorintheBostonregion(Saflund,2007).Soensuringtechnical
knowledge(frommultipledisciplines)iscoupledwithskillsfocusedonthecommercial
imperativewillinevitably“over‐inflate”degreesincreasingthetimespanrequiredtodeliver
suchdegrees(seeColletandWyatt,2005).
Themotivationforthisstudywastoanalyseacuttingedgeindustrythatoperatesinadvance
ofmostmainstreamindustries.Thereisnotatemplateformanaginginthisindustry.Forthe
specificsoftheinnovationandcommercialisationindustrysector,ourstudyalsohighlightsa
careerandorganisationalprogressionfromscience(discovery)throughtechnology
(application)tomanagement(implementation)thatisrarelysupportedbyanintegrated
educationprocess.Inthetransitionfromdiscoverytoimplementation,managementprovides
anextensiontothescienceandtechnologyunderpinningtheorganisationratherthanasan
add‐onactivity(LiyanangeandPoon,2003;Phanetal.,2009;Austinetal.,2009).Freyand
Osborne(2013)believethattheglobalshifttoknowledge‐intensiveandtechnology‐rich
23
industrieswillrequireemployeeswhoarebothhighlyskilledtechniciansaswellascreative
businessmanagers.Comprehensive,integratedcurriculaarerequiredwheretargeted
businessconcepts,processesandtoolsareembeddedintechnology‐baseddisciplinesto
preparestudentsforcommercialrealities.Suchcurriculashouldbemainstream,ratherthan
boutiqueofferingsinHEIs(forexamplesseeColletandWyatt,2005;Barretal.,2009;
Thursbyetal.,2009).Suchskillsimpartedingraduateswouldbeeasilytransferredinto
differentworkplacecontextsandfacilitatesmoothertransitionintotheworkplace.This
instillationisalsoavalidroleforbusinessschoolstoplayintheiruniversities.
Roos(2014)arguesthatbusinessstudentsneedtolearnaboutscienceandtechnologyasthis
iswheremuchofinnovationoccurs.Businesseducationneedstobridgethedividebetween
naturalandsocialsciences.Similarly,facultiesofscienceandtechnologyneedtosearchfor
anddiscoverthevalueofthecommercialimperative,toevolvetowardsamiddleground.If
thecurriculumredesignsuggesteddoesgainmomentum,wewillseeintegrativeMBA
programscognisantoftheunderpinningscience,technologyandpathwaysto
commercialisationincreasinglytaketheirplacealongsidecurrentstand‐aloneMBAprograms.
Insummary,ourdemandsideviewofgraduateskillsprovidesataxonomyofskills.However,
listsremainjustlistsuntiltherelationshipsbetweenitemsareestablished(Pellegrinoand
Hilton,2012).Theconnectionsbetweenskillsneedtobedrawntounderstandthedrivers
thatcreatethefunctionalgraduateasawhole.Ourstudyhasbeguntoteaseoutthe
connectionsbetweenskillsandexploretherelationshipsbetweenskills,organisationalfitand
performance,intermsoftheindividualandthefirminacompetitivemarketplace.Yetmore
progresstowardsclosingthegapneedstobemade.Itisnotthatemployershavefailedto
articulatetheirdemandsclearlytothehighereducationsector(Rosenbergetal.,2012)as
employershaverespondedadinfinitumtosurveysdominatedbysimplelists(LaiandViering,
2012).Thefailuretogeneratethesecondandthirdgenerationskillsframeworksthatare
empiricallymeaningful,widelyacceptedandvalidatedinindustrysettingspresentsamissed
opportunitytodateforthegraduatesofhighereducation.Goodpolicyreliesonrobust,
evidentiallysupportedguidancetocoordinateandassistallstakeholders–students,industry
andHEIs–simultaneously.
24
REFERENCES
Adelman,C.(2009),“TheBolognaprocessforUSeyes:Re‐learninghighereducationintheage
ofconvergence”,InstituteforHigherEducationPolicy,Washington,DC,availableat:
www.ihep.org/assets/files/EYESFINAL.pdf(accessed16thJune2014).
Ananiadou,K.andClaro,M.(2009),“21stCenturyskillsandcompetenciesforthenew
millenniumlearnersinOECDcountries”,OECDWorkingPapersNo41,OECDPublishing,
Paris.
Anderson,L.W.andKrathwohl,D.(Eds.),(2001),ATaxonomyforLearning,Teachingand
Assessing:ArevisionsofBloom’staxonomyofeducationalobjectives,Longmans,New
York.
Austin,R.D.,Nolan,R.L.andO’Donnell,S.(2009),“Thetechnologymanager’sjourney:An
extendednarrativeapproachtoeducatingtechnicalleaders”,AcademyofManagement
LearningandEducation,Vol.8,No.3,pp.337‐355.
AustralianInstituteofManagement(AIM).(2009),“Australia’sworkforceskillsgap”,
AustralianInstituteofManagement–Qld&NT,availableat:
www.aimqld.com.au/research/documents/AustraliasWorkforceSkillsGap09.pdf
(accessed16thJune2014).
AustralianWorkforceandProductivityAgency(AWPA).(2014),“ManufacturingWorkforce
Study”,AustralianWorkforceandProductivityAgency,Canberra.
Barr,H.(1997),“Interprofessionaleducation:Adefinition”,CentreforAdvancementof
InterprofessionalEducationBulletin,No.13,p19.
BarrS.H.,Baker,T.,Markham,S.K.andKingonA.I.(2009),“Bridgingthevalleyofdeath:
Lessonslearnedfrom14yearsofcommercialisationoftechnologyeducation”,Academy
ofManagementLearningandEducation,Vol.8,No3,pp.370‐388.
Barrie,S.,Hughes,C.andSmith,C.(2009),“Thenationalgraduateattributesproject:
Integrationandassessmentofgraduateattributesinthecurriculum.FinalReport”,
AustralianLearningandTeachingCouncil,Sydney.
Bass,B.andBass,R.(2008),TheBassHandbookofLeadership:Theory,Research,and
ManagerialApplications,FreePress,NewYork.
Binkley,M.,Erstad,O.,Herman,J.,Raizan,S.,Ripley,M.andRumble,M.(2010),“Defining21st
Centuryskills.Assessment&Teaching21stCenturySkills”,availableat:
http://atc21s.org/index.php/resources/white‐papers/#item1(accessed16thJune
2014).
25
Blades,R.,Fauth,B.andGibb,J.(2012),“Measuringemployabilityskills”,NationalChildren’s
Bureau,London.
Bloom,B.S.(Ed.).(1956),TaxonomyofEducationObjectives:Theclassificationofeducational
goals:HandbookI,cognitivedomain,Longmans,NewYork.
Bromage,A.(2009),“Interprofessionaleducation”,
http://highereducationresources.atspace.com/interprofessional.htm(accessed16th
June2014).
Casner‐Lotto,J.andBarrington,L.(2006),“Aretheyreallyreadytowork?Employers’
perspectivesonthebasicknowledgeandappliedskillsofnewentrantstothe21st
CenturyU.S.workforce”,availableat:
www.p21.org/storage/documents/FINAL_REPORT_PDF09‐29‐06.pdf(accessed16th
June2014).
ConfederationofBritishIndustry(CBI).(2011),‘Workingtowardsyourfuture:Makingthe
mostofyourtimeinhighereducation”,ConfederationofBritishIndustry,availableat:
www.cbi.org.uk(accessed16thJune2014).
ConferenceBoardofCanada(CBC).(2000),“Employabilityskills2000+”,ConferenceBoardof
Canada,availableat:www.conferenceboard.ca/Libraries/educ_public/esp2000.sflb
(accessed24thOctober2014).
Christensen,C.M.(1997),TheInnovator’sDilemma.HarvardBusinessSchoolPress,Boston.
Collet,C.andWyatt,D.(2005),“Bioneering–teachingbiotechnologyentrepreneurshipatthe
undergraduatelevel”,Education+Training,Vol.47,pp.408‐421.
DelaHarpe,B.,Radloff,A.,Scoufis,M.,Dalton,H.,Thomas,J.,Lawson,A.,David,C.andGirardi,
A.(2009),“TheB‐factorproject:Understandingacademicstaffbeliefsaboutgraduate
attributes.FinalReport”,AustralianLearningandTeachingCouncil,Sydney.
DeWeert,E.(2011),“Perspectivesonhighereducationandthelabourmarket:Reviewof
internationalpolicydevelopments”,CentreforHigherEducationPolicyStudies,
UniversityofTwente,Enschede,TheNetherlands.
DepartmentofBusiness,InnovationandSkills(DBIS).(2011),“Newchallenges,newchances–
Furthereducationandskillsreform:Buildingaworldclassskillssystem“,DBIS,London.
DepartmentofBusiness,InnovationandSkills(DBIS).(2013),“Rigourandresponsivenessin
skills”,DBIS,London.
DepartmentofEducation,EmploymentandWorkplaceRelations(DEEWR).(2008),
“Australiancoreskillsframework”,DEEWR,Canberra.
DepartmentofEducation,ScienceandTraining(DEST).(2002),“Employabilityskillsforthe
26
future”,DEST,Canberra.
DepartmentofEducation,ScienceandTraining(DEST).(2007),“Graduateemployability
skills”,DEST,Canberra.
DepartmentofEducation,TrainingandYouthAffairs(DETYA).(1998),“Learningforlife:
Reviewofhighereducationfinancingandpolicy”,DETYA,Canberra.
DepartmentforEmploymentandSkills(DES).(2003),“21stCenturyskills:Realisingour
potential–individuals,employers,nation”,DES,London.
EuropeanCommission(EC).(2003),“GreenPaper:EntrepreneurshipinEurope”,EC,Brussels.
Field,A.(2013),DiscoveringstatisticsusingSPSS,4thed.SagePublications,London,pp.372‐
373.
Finch,D.J.,Hamilton,L.K.,Baldwin,R.andZehner,M.(2013),“Anexploratorystudyoffactors
affectingundergraduateemployability”,Education+Training,Vol.55,pp.681‐704.
Frey,C.B.andOsborne,M.A.(2013),“Thefutureofemployment:Howsusceptiblearejobsto
computerisation”,OxfordMartinProgrammeontheImpactsofFutureTechnology,
OxfordUniversity,Oxford,availableat:
http://www.oxfordmartin.ox.ac.uk/downloads/academic/The_Future_of_Employment.
pdf(accessed16thJune2014).
Gartner,W.B.andVesper,K.H.(1994),Experimentsinentrepreneurshipeducation:Successes
andfailures.JournalofBusinessVenturing,Vol.9,No.3,pp.179‐187.
Gibb,A.(2002),“Inpursuitofanew‘enterprise’and‘entrepreneurship’paradigmfor
learning:creativedestruction,newvalues,newwaysofdoingthingsandnew
combinationsofknowledge”,InternationalJournalofManagementReviews,Vol.4,No.3,
pp.233‐269.
Hammick,M.,Freeth,D.,Koppel,I.,Reeves,S.andBarr,H.(2007),“Abestevidencesystematic
reviewofinterprofessionaleducation:BEMEguideno.9”,MedicalTeacher,Vol.29,No.
8,pp.735‐751.
Harvey,L.(2001),“Definingandmeasuringemployability”,QualityinHigherEducation,Vol.7,
No.2,pp.97–109.
Harvey,L.(2003),“Transitionsfromhighereducationtowork”,EnhancingStudent
EmployabilityCo‐ordinationTeam,availableat:
www.qualityresearchinternational.com/esecttools/esectpubs/harveytransitions.pdf
(accessed16thJune2014).
Harvey,L.(2005),“Embeddingandintegratingemployability”NewDirectionsforInstitutional
Research,Vol.128,Winter,pp.13‐28.
27
Harvey,L.andMason,S.(1996),“Aqualitygraduate”,inTait,J.andKnight,P.(Eds.),The
ManagementofIndependentLearning,KoganPage/SEDA,London,pp.13‐28.
Heimler,R.,Rosenberg,S.andMorote,E‐S.(2012),“Predictingcareeradvancementwith
structuralequationmodeling”,Education+Training,Vol.54,pp.85‐94.
Hilton,M.(2008),“Researchonfutureskillsdemands:Aworkshopsummary”,National
AcademiesPress,Washington.
Hilton,M.(2010),“Exploringtheintersectionofscienceeducationand21stCenturyskills”,
NationalAcademiesPress,Washington.
Hinchliffe,G.W.andJolly,A.(2011),“Graduateidentityandemployability”,BritishEducational
ResearchJournal,Vol.37,No.4,pp.563‐584
Holmes,L.(2001),“Reconsideringgraduateemployability:Thegraduateidentityapproach”,
QualityinHigherEducation,Vol.7,No.2,pp.111‐119.
HartResearchAssociates/AssociationofAmericanCollegesandUniversities(HRA).(2010),
“Raisingthebar:Employers’viewsoncollegelearninginthewakeoftheeconomic
downturn”,HRA,Washington,DC,availableat:
www.aacu.org/leap/documents/2009_EmployerSurvey.pdf(accessed16thJune2014).
Jerald,C.D.(2008),“Benchmarkingforsuccess:EnsuringU.S.studentsreceiveaworld‐class
education“,NationalGovernorsAssociation,Washington,DC.
Koenig,J.A.(2011),“Assessing21stCenturyskills:Summaryofaworkshop”,National
ResearchCouncil,Washington,DC.
Kottmann,A.anddeWeert,E.(2013),“Highereducationandthelabourmarket:International
policyframeworksforregulatinggraduateemployability”,CentreforHigherEducation
PolicyStudies,Enschede,TheNetherlands,availableat:
www.government.nl/documents‐and‐publications/reports/2013/02/01/higher‐
education‐and‐the‐labour‐market.html(accessed24thOctober2014).
Kuncel,N.(2011).“Measurementandmeaningofcriticalthinking”,NRCWorkshopon
Assessmentof21stCenturySkills,Washington,DC,availableat:www7.national‐
academies.org/bota/21st_Century_Workshop_Kuncel_Paper.pdf(accessed9thJanuary
2013).
Kyllonen,P.C.(2012),“Measurementof21stCenturyskillswithintheCommonCoreState
Standards”,EducationTestingService,availableat:
www.k12center.org/rsc/pdf/session5‐kyllonen‐paper‐tea2012.pdf(accessed24th
October2014).
Ladhari,R.(2009),“AreviewoftwentyyearsofSERVQUALresearch”,InternationalJournalof
28
QualityandServiceScience,Vol.1,No.2,pp.172‐198.
Lai,E.R.andViering,M.(2012),“Assessing21stCenturyskills:Integratingresearchfindings”,
NationalCouncilonMeasurementinEducation,availableat:
http://researchnetwork.pearson.com/wp‐
content/uploads/Assessing_21st_Century_Skills_NCME.pdf(accessed16thJune2014).
Leitch,S.(2006),“Prosperityforallintheglobaleconomy–worldclassskills.FinalReport”,
HMTreasury,London.
Levy,F.(2010),“Howtechnologychangesdemandsforhumanskills”,OECDEducation
WorkingPapers,No45.OECDPublishing,Paris.
Liyanage,S.andPoon,P.S(2003),“Technologyandinnovationmanagementlearninginthe
knowledgeeconomy”,JournalofManagementDevelopment,Vol.22,pp.579‐602.
Lomax‐Smith,J.,Watson,L.andWebster,B.(2011),“Highereducationbasefundingreview–
Finalreport”,DepartmentofEducation,EmploymentandWorkplaceRelations,
Canberra
Lumpkin,G.T.andDess,G.G.(1996),Clarifyingtheentrepreneurialorientationconstructand
linkingittoperformance.AcademyofManagementReview,Vol.21,No.1,pp.135‐172.
MacKinnon,P.,Rifkin,W.,Hine,D.andBarnard,R.(2010),"Complexityandmasteryin
shapinginterdisciplinarity",inTight,M.(Ed.)InterdisciplinaryHigherEducation:
PerspectivesandPracticalities,JAIElsevier/EmeraldGroup,Bingley,UK,pp.29‐53.
Manyika,J.,Lund,S.,Auguste,B.,Mendonca,L.,Welsh,T.andRamaswamy,S.(2011),“An
economythatworks:JobcreationandAmerica’sfuture”.McKinseyGlobalInstitute,
availableat:
www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/research/labor_markets/an_economy_that_works_fo
r_us_job_creation(accessed16thJune2014).
Mason,G.,Williams,G.andCranmer,S.(2009),“Employabilityskillsinitiativesinhigher
education:whateffectsdotheyhaveongraduatelabourmarketoutcomes?”Education
Economics,Vol.17,No.1,pp.1‐30.
MassachusettsInstituteofTechnology(MIT)(2011),“Thethirdrevolution:Theconvergence
ofthelifesciences,physicalsciences,andengineering”,MIT,Washington,DC,available
at:www.convergencerevolution.net/#!history/c1lw3(accessed16June2014).
McLeish,A.(2002),“EmployabilityskillsforAustraliansmallandmediumsizedenterprises”,
DepartmentofEducation,ScienceandTraining,CommonwealthofAustralia,Canberra.
Meyer,A.D.,Aten,K.,Holloway,S.S.,Krause,A.J.andMetzger,M.(2011),“Creatingauniversity
technologycommercialisationprogram:Confrontingconflictsbetweenlearning
29
discoveryandcommercialisation”,InternationalJournalofEntrepreneurshipand
InnovationManagement,Vol.13,No.2,pp179‐198.
MillennialBranding.(2012),“Studyrevealsanemploymentgapbetweenemployersand
students”,Boston,MA,availableat:
http://millennialbranding.com/2012/05/millennial‐branding‐student‐employment‐
gap‐study/(accessed16thJune2014).
Moreland,N.(2007),“Entrepreneurshipandhighereducation:anemployabilityperspective”,
LearningandEmployability,series1,HigherEducationAcademy,Heslington,York..
Mourshed.M.,Farrell,D.andBarton,D.(2012),“Educationtoemployment:Designinga
systemthatworks”.McKinseyCenterforGovernment,availableat:
http://mckinseyonsociety.com/education‐to‐employment/report/(accessed16thJune
2014).
NationalAcademiesofSciences(NA).(2007),“Risingabovethegatheringstorm:Energising
andemployingAmericaforabrightereconomicfuture”,NationalAcademiesPress,
Washington,DC.
NationalAcademiesofSciences(NA).(2010),“Risingabovethegatheringstorm,revisited:
Rapidlyapproachingcategory5”,NationalAcademiesPress,Washington,DC.
NationalAssociationofCollegesandEmployers(NACE).(2013),“JobOutlook2014”,NACE,
Bethlehem,PA,availableat:www.naceweb.org(accessed16thJune2014).
NationalCommitteeofInquiryintoHigherEducation(NCIHE).(1997),“Highereducationin
thelearningsociety”,NCIHE,HerMajesty’sStationaryOffice,London.
NationalInstitutesofHealth(NIH).(2012),“Biomedicalresearchworkforceworkinggroup
draftreport”,NIH,Washington,DC,availableat:http://acd.od.nih.gov/bmw_report.pdf
(accessed16thJune2014).
NationalResearchCouncil(NRC).(2014),“Educationforlifeandwork:Aguidefor
practitioners”,NRC,Washington,DC.
OrganisationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment(OECD).(1999),“Measuring
studentknowledgeandskills:Anewframeworkforassessment”,OECD,Paris.
OrganisationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment(OECD).(2005),“Thedefinitionand
selectionofkeycompetencies:Executivesummary”,OECD,Paris.
OrganisationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment(OECD).(2011),“TowardsanOECD
skillsstrategy”,OECD,Paris.
Partnershipfor21stCenturySkills(P21CS).(2009),“P21frameworkdefinitions”,PC21S,
Washington,DC,availableat:
30
www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf(accessed16thJune
2014).
Packer,A.(1993),“Skillsdeficiencies:Problems,policiesandprospects”,JournalofLabor
Research,Vol14,No.3,pp227‐247.
Pegg.A.,Waldock,J.,Hendy‐Isaac,S.andLawton,R.(2012),“Pedagogyforemployability”,
HigherEducationAcademy,Heslington,York.
Pellegrino,J.W.andHilton,M.L.(2012),“Educationforlifeandwork:Developingtransferable
knowledgeandskillsinthe21stCentury”,NationalAcademiesPress,Washington.
Phan,P.H.,Siegel,D.S.andWright,M.(2009),“Newdevelopmentsinthetechnology
managementeducation:Backgroundissues,programinitiatives,andaresearchagenda”,
AcademyofManagementLearning&Education,Vol.8,No.3,pp.324‐336.
Pisano,G.P.(1994),“Knowledge,integration,andthelocusoflearning:Anempiricalanalysis
ofprocessdevelopment”,StrategicManagementJournal,Vol.15,SpecialEditionWinter
pp.85‐100.
Poister,T.H.andClaytonThomas,J.(2011),“Theeffectofexpectationsandexpectancy
confirmation/disconfirmationonmotorists’satisfactionwithStatehighways”,Journalof
PublicAdministrationResearchandTheory,Vol.21,No.4,pp.601‐618.
Reinard,J.C.(2006),“Communicationresearchstatistics:Exploratoryfactoranalysis”,Sage
ResearchMethodsOnline,ThousandOaks,CA,availableat:
http://srmo.sagepub.com/view/communication‐research‐statistics/n15.xml,(accessed
9thJanuary2013).
Remington‐Doucette,S.M.,HillerConnell,K.Y.,Armstrong,C.M.andMusgrove,S.L.(2013),
“Assessingsustainabilityeducationinatrans‐disciplinaryundergraduatecourse
focusedonreal‐worldproblemsolving:Acasefordisciplinarygrounding”,International
JournalofSustainabilityinHigherEducation,Vol.14,pp.404‐433.
Richens,G.(1999),“PerceptionsofsouthernNevadaemployersregardingimportanceof
SCANSworkplacebasicskills”,AnnualMeetingoftheAssociationforCareerand
TechnicalEducation,OrlandoFL,December12‐15.
Riebe,L.,Roepen,D.,Santarelli,B.andMarchioro,G.(2010),“Teamwork:effectivelyteaching
anemployabilityskill”,Education+Training,Vol.52,No.6/7,pp.528‐539.
Roos,J.(2014),“Therenaissanceweneedinbusinesseducation”,HarvardBusinessReview,
availableat:hbr.org/2014/07/the‐renaissance‐we‐need‐in‐business‐education
(accessed7thJune2015).
Rosenberg,S.,Heimler,R.andMorote,E‐S.(2012),“Basicemployabilityskills:Atriangular
31
designapproach”,Education+Training,Vol.54,No.1,pp.7‐20.
SkillsAustralia(SA).(2011),“Skillsforprosperity:Aroadmapforvocationaleducationand
training”,SA,CommonwealthofAustralia,Canberra.
Saflund,P.(2007)“BATECinformationtechnologyworkforceskillsstudy”.SaflundInstitute/
BostonAreaAdvancedTechnologicalEducationConnections,Boston,MA,availableat:
http://batec.org/about/publications(accessed9thJanuary2013).
Secretary’sCommissiononAchievingNecessarySkills(SCANS).(1991),“Whatworkrequires
ofschools”,SCANS,USDepartmentofLabor,Wasington,DC,availableat:
http://wdr.doleta.gov/SCANS/whatwork/(accessed16thJune2014).
Silva,E.(2008),“Measuringskillsforthe21stCentury”,EducationSectorReports,availableat:
www.educationsector.org/publications/measuring‐skills‐21st‐century(accessed16th
June2014).
Soland,J.,Hamilton,L.S.andStecher,B.M.(2013),“Measuring21stCenturycompetencies:
Guidanceforeducators”,RandCorporation/AsiaSociety,NewYork.
Stasz,C.(2001),“Assessingskillsforwork:twoperspectives”,OxfordEconomicPapers,Vol.
53,No.3,pp.385‐405.
Swap,R.J.andWayland,K.(2013),“Workingacrossdisciplinesandchippingawayatsilos
withSLCE:Aninterdisciplinaryapproachtoeducatingscienceandengineering
students”,InternationalJournalforServiceLearninginEngineering,SpecialEditionFall
2013,pp.120‐136.
Taajamaa,V.,Westerlund,T.,Guo,X.,Mupli,M.,Salantera,S.andSalakoski,T.(2014),
“Interdisciplinaryengineeringeducation–Practicebasedcase”,4thInterdisciplinary
DesignEducationConference,March2014,IEEE,pp31‐37.
Tallantyre,F.andKettle,J.(2011).“Learningfromexperienceinemployerengagement”,
HigherEducationAuthority,Heslington,York.
Thursby,M.C.,Fuller,A.W.andThursby,J.(2009),“Anintegratedapproachtoeducating
professionalsforcareersininnovation”,AcademyofManagementLearningand
Education,Vol.8,No.3,pp.389‐405.
Tomlinson,M.(2012),“Graduateemployability:Areviewofconceptualandempirical
themes”,HigherEducationPolicy,Vol.25,No.4,pp.407‐431.
UKCommissionforEmploymentandSkills(UKCES).(2009),‘Theemployabilitychallenge–
fullreport’,UKCES,London.
UKCommissionforEmploymentandSkills(UKCES).(2010),“Employability:incentivising
improvement”,UKCES,London.
32
UKCommissionforEmploymentandSkills(UKCES).(2013),“Employerownershipofskills:
Buildingthemomentum”,UKCES,London.
UKCommissionforEmploymentandSkills(UKCES).(2014),“Forgingfutures–building
higherlevelskillsthroughuniversityandemployercollaboration”,UKCES,London.
Wang,S.andNoe,R.A.(2010),"Knowledgesharing:Areviewanddirectionsforfuture
research",HumanResourceManagementReview,Vol20,No.2,pp.115‐131.
Whitefoot,K.S.andOlson,S.(2012),“Makingvalue:Integratingmanufacturing,design,and
innovationtothriveinthechangingglobaleconomy”,NationalAcademiesPress,
Washington.
Wright,M.,Hmieleski,K.M.,Siegel,D.S.andEnsley,M.D.(2007),“Theroleofhumancapitalin
technologicalentrepreneurship”,EntrepreneurshipTheoryandPractice,Vol.31,No.6,
pp.791‐806.
Wrigley,C.andBucolo,S.(2011),“Teachingdesign‐ledinnovation:thefutureofindustrial
design”,DesignPrinciplesandPractices,Vol.5,No.2,pp.231‐240.
33
[LegendtoTable1(nextpage)]
Table1:GenericskillsframeworksmappedtothetaxonomyofPellegrinoandHilton(2012).
TheOECD(2005),UKCES(2009),P21CS(2009)andAT21CS(Binkleyetal.,2010)
frameworksaremappedtothethreeclustersofkeycompetenciesdefinedbyPellegrinoand
Hilton(2012)as:cognitive,interpersonalandintrapersonal.
34
SkillsFrameworks
OECDKeyCompetenciesOECD(2005)
UKCES Employability Skills UKCES (2009)
21stCenturySkillsAT21CS(Binkleyetal.,2010)
Partnershipfor21stCenturySkillsAdaptedfromP21CS(2009)
Transferable21stCenturySkills(Pellegrino&Hilton,2012)
COGNITIVECOMPETENCYCLUSTER
Usetoolsinteractively Uselanguage,symbolsandtext
interactively Useknowledgeandinformation
interactively Usetechnologyinteractively
Thinking and solving problems Creativity, reflecting on & learning from own
actions, prioritising, analysing situations,, developing solutions
Using numbers effectively Measuring, recording measurements,
calculating, estimating quantities, relating numbers to the job
Using language effectively Writing clearly & in a way appropriate to the
context, ordering facts and concepts logically Using IT effectively Operating a computer using basic systems and
learning other applications as necessary, using telephones and other technology to communicate
Understanding the business Understanding how the individual job fits into
the organisation as a whole, Recognising the needs of stakeholders, judging risks, innovating, contributing to the whole organisation
Waysofthinking Creativityandinnovation Criticalthinking,problem
solving,decisionmaking Learningtolearn,metacognitionToolsforworking Informationliteracy ICTliteracy
Coresubjects&21stCenturythemes Coresubjects:English, world languages, arts,
mathematics, economics, science, geography, history, government & civics
21stCenturythemes:literaciesinglobal awareness, finance, economics, business and entrepreneurship, civics, health, environment
Information, media & technology Information literacy
o Access & evaluate information o Use and manage information
Media literacy: analyse & create media ICT literacy: apply technology effectively Learning & innovation skills (1) Creativityandinnovation
o Thinkcreativelyo Workcreativelywithotherso Implementinnovations
Criticalthinking&problemsolvingo Reasoneffectivelyo Usesystemsthinkingo Makejudgements&decisionso Solveproblems
Cognitive Cognitiveprocesses&strategies
o Criticalthinkingo Problemsolvingo Analysis,interpretationo Reason,argumentationo Decisionmakingo Adaptivelearningo Executivefunction
Knowledgeo Informationliteracyo ICTliteracyo Communication–oral,aural,written
Creativityo Creativityo Innovation
INTERPERSONALCOMPETENCYCLUSTER Interactinheterogeneousgroups
Relatewelltoothers Cooperate,workinteams Manageandresolveconflicts
Working together and communicating Cooperating, being assertive, persuading, being
responsible to others, speaking clearly to individuals & groups & listening for a response
Waysofworking Communication Collaboration(teamwork)
Learning & innovation skills (2) Communication & Collaboration
o Communicateclearlyo Collaborate with others
Life&CareerSkills(1) Social & cross cultural skills
o Interacteffectivelywithotherso Workeffectivelyindiverseteams
Leadership & responsibility o Guide&leadotherso Beresponsibletoothers
Interpersonal Teamwork&collaboration
o Communicationo Collaborationo Teamworko Cooperation,coordinationo Interpersonalskillso Empathy/perspectiveo Trusto Serviceorientationo Conflictresolutiono Negotiation
Leadershipo Leadershipo Responsibilityo Assertivecommunicationo Self‐presentationo Socialinfluencewithothers
INTRAPERSONALCOMPETENCYCLUSTER
Actautonomously Actwithinthebigpicture Formandconductlifeplansand
personalprojects Defendandassertrights,
interests,limitsandneeds
Positive Approach Ready to participate make suggestions, accept
new ideas & constructive criticism, take responsibility for outcomes
Self Management Punctuality & time management, fitting dress
& behaviour to context, overcoming challenges and asking for help when necessary
Livingintheworld Citizenship–localandglobal Lifeandcareer Personalandsocial
responsibility–includingculturalawarenessandcompetence
Life&CareerSkills(2) Initiative & self-direction
o Manage goals & time o Work independently o Be self-directed learners
Productivity & accountability o Manage projects o Produce results
Flexibility & adaptability o Adapt to change o Be flexible
Intrapersonal Intellectualopenness
o Flexibility,adaptabilityo Artisticandculturalappreciationo Personalandsocialresponsibilityo Appreciationfordiversityo Continuouslearningo Intellectualinterestandcuriosity
Workethic/Conscientiousnesso Initiative,self‐directiono Responsibility,perserverance,productivityo Selfregulation:forethought,performance,self‐
reflectiono Professionalism,ethicso Integrityo Citizenshipo Careerorientation
Positivecoreselfevaluationo Self:monitoring,evaluation,reinforcemento Physicalandpsychologicalhealth
35
Table2:NumbersoforganisationssurveyedinthedifferentcategoriesrepresentingtheAustralianinnovationandcommercialisationindustryinfrastructure(seealsoFigure1).TypeofOrganisation NumbersurveyedVentureCapital 44R&DConsortium 28R&DFundingAgency 11Commercialisation/TranslationalOrganisation 15ManagementandFinancialConsulting 17GovernmentAgency 7CommercialLaw 9ResearchFacility 8ResearchCentre 25ResearchInstitute 22ResearchOrganisation 21TOTAL 207
36
[LegendforTable3(nextpage)]
Table3:Thetenskillsfieldsconstructs(column1)resolvedbyfirstorderprincipal
componentanalysiswithPromaxrotationandKaisernormalisation.Eachconstructshows
highCronbachα(CA)values(column2)andEigenvalues>1(column2)thattogetherexplain
66%ofthecumulativetotalvariance(column3).Column4describesthealignmentof
individualskillswithhigherorderskillsfieldsconstructswhilecolumns5and6providethe
meansofIMPresponse(Im)anddifferencebetweenthemeansofIMPandEVD(IM‐IE)foreach
skillitem,respectively.Forall61items,one‐tailedt‐testswithBonferronicorrectionshowed
IMPMeantobesignificantlyhigherthanEVDMean(p/2<0.001)(datanotshown).Thesizeeffect
wasdeterminedusingCohen’sdtestand59itemsshoweddvalues(column7)>0.5(medium
tolarge),withtwoitemsreturningdvaluesof0.320and0.456indicatingasmalltomedium
sizeeffect.
.
37
Skill Field Construct
Eigen-value /
CA
% of Var Items IM IM-EM
d value
Factor Load’
#1 Knowledge
20.800 / 0.905 34.098
Evaluate information and data Accurately report information Synthesise information and data Accurately document information from different sources Critically question Communicate effectively with discipline specialists Understand essential concepts relating to the specific discipline Share new knowledge with others Basic general knowledge in technical area Retrieve information from different sources
4.61 4.55 4.51 4.44 4.47 4.32 4.41 4.19 4.11 4.48
1.07 1.03 1.13 0.95 1.13 1.03 0.77 0.79 0.75 0.66
1.302 1.290 1.327 1.142 1.187 1.186 0.928 0.995 0.892 0.880
0.849 0.846 0.845 0.816 0.704 0.662 0.622 0.594 0.532 0.531
#2 Enterprise Leadership
5.327/ 0.911 8.732
Lead a new venture Marshal resources for a new enterprise Identify key people in a venture Gain management support for a new enterprise Inspire others Negotiate Knowledge of administrative systems Form an effective team Willingness to take risks Work effectively in uncertain environments Influence team behaviour to promote positive team outcomes Plan business ventures Recognise an opportunity Work autonomously Adapt to new situations
3.22 3.36 3.64 3.40 3.71 3.73 3.03 3.80 3.30 3.97 3.98 2.97 3.95 3.98 4.17
0.81 0.95 1.08 0.80 0.84 1.20 0.90 1.05 0.60 1.04 0.98 0.83 1.37 0.71 0.88
0.760 0.887 1.035 0.728 0.900 1.220 1.237 1.000 0.624 1.112 1.077 0.756 1.500 0.762 1.039
0.784 0.783 0.773 0.708 0.703 0.680 0.670 0.658 0.657 0.645 0.610 0.599 0.570 0.523 0.458
#3 Business Function
2.067/ 0.839 3.389
Knowledge of accounting Knowledge of financial systems Knowledge of general principles of law relating to business Knowledge of marketing
2.61 3.08 2.86 2.82
0.52 0.81 0.80 0.70
0.456 0.710 0.664 0.690
0.835 0.804 0.781 0.732
#4 Technical Management
1.967/ 0.880 3.225
Manage a project Mentor Reach a timely independent decision Apply knowledge in practice Build positive customer relations Apply discipline knowledge to solution of problems of an unfamiliar nature Apply discipline knowledge to solution of problems of a familiar nature Deep knowledge of a specific discipline
3.98 3.45 3.86 4.35 3.98 4.02 4.17 3.83
1.13 0.86 0.95 1.10 0.90 1.22 0.68 0.59
1.155 0.829 1.025 1.370 0.813 1.338
0.757 0.566
0.760 0.704 0.695 0.693 0.672 0.668
0.661 0.657
#5 Team Worker
1.792/ 0.794 2.937
Behave in a non-judgmental manner Respond positively to feedback Appreciation of cultural diversity Reflect on own performance Interpret team dynamics Awareness of roles and responsibilities of team members
3.99 4.22 3.86 4.20 3.84 4.00
0.69 0.77 0.31 1.01 1.01 0.85
0.743 0.935 0.320 1.167 1.061 0.919
0.763 0.682 0.658 0.623 0.589 0.553
#6 Interprofessional Collaboration
1.594/ 0.845 2.613
Adapt one’s own skills and knowledge to fit with other professionals Work collaboratively with other professions Work in an interdisciplinary team Communicate effectively with non-experts Appreciation of the client's perspective
4.09 4.36 4.25 4.16 4.29
0.90 1.00 0.83 1.17 1.14
1.061 1.158 0.935 1.299 1.165
0.807 0.766 0.698 0.693 0.670
#7 Leadership Antecedence
1.429/ 0.713 2.343
Effective written communication skills Effective oral communication skills Strong action orientation Drive to succeed
4.52 4.45 4.12 4.40
1.34 1.01 0.87 0.65
1.660 1.294 1.070 0.875
0.710 0.694 0.609 0.556
#8 Progress
1.358/ 0.839 2.227
Knowledge of commercialisation pathways Understanding of technology valuation Understand emerging technology and its potential impact Understanding of new product/service development processes
3.25 3.06 3.66 2.99
1.12 0.84 0.77 0.87
1.021 0.709 0.743 0.801
0.788 0.766 0.715 0.708
#9 Improve
1.235/ 0.828 2.024 Responsibility for continuing professional learning
Initiative for continuing professional learning 4.07 4.01
0.52 0.62
0.580 0.680
0.833 0.810
#10 Create
1.195/ 0.794 1.958
Acquire new external knowledge Assimilate new external knowledge with existing knowledge Create new knowledge
4.32 4.36 4.00
0.71 0.83 0.80
0.914 1.089 0.782
0.716 0.610 0.564
Cumulative % of Variance: 63.5
38
Table4:SecondorderEFAresolvedtwometaconstructsthatsuggestorganisationalfitand
organisationalsuccessunderpintheindustryresponsetoskillsrequirements.Column2
providesthederivedEigenvaluesandCronbachα(CA)values.
Metaconstruct Eigenvalue / CA % of Variance SkillsFields Factor
Loading
#1OrganisationalFit
5.558/ 0.635
55.583
KnowledgeInterprofessionalismCreateTeamWorkerLeadershipAntecedenceImprove
0.872 0.792 0.789 0.745 0.734 0.705
#2OrganisationalSuccess
1.272/ 0.678
12.716
EnterpriseLeadershipProgressBusinessFunctionTechnicalManagement
0.895 0.849 0.822 0.816
Cumulative%ofVariance 68.299
39
Figure1:Conceptualframeworkoftheinnovationandcommercialisationindustrydisplayingthe
typesoforganisationsandtheirrelationshiptothepipelineprocess.Abbreviationsused:R&D=
researchanddevelopment,R&d=researchandinitialdevelopment.