69
By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS IN CONSTRUCTION

By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

ByAssoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ

Gaziantep UniversityDepartment of Civil Engineering

CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS IN CONSTRUCTION

Page 2: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

2 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

TOPICS

Formulating AlternativesPW of Equal-Life AlternativesPW of Different-Life alternativesFuture Worth AnalysisCapitalized Cost AnalysisIndependent projectsPayback Period

CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS

Page 3: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

3 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.1 FORMULATING MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE ALTERNATIVES

Viable firms/organizations have the capability to generate potential beneficial projects for potential investmentTwo types of investment categories Mutually Exclusive Set Independent Project Set

Page 4: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

4 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.1 FORMULATING MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE ALTERNATIVES

Mutually Exclusive set is where a candidate set of alternatives exist (more than one)Objective: Pick one and only one from the set.Once selected, the remaining alternatives are excluded.

Page 5: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

5 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.1 INDEPENDENT PROJECT SET

Given a set of alternatives (more than one)The objective is to: Select the best possible combination of

projects from the set that will optimize a given criteria.

Subjects to constraints More difficult problem than the

mutually exclusive approach

Page 6: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

6 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.1 FORMULATING MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE ALTERNATIVES

Mutually exclusive alternatives compete with each other.Independent alternatives may or may not compete with each otherThe independent project selection problem deals with constraints and may require a mathematical programming or bundling technique to evaluate.

Page 7: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

7 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.1 Type of Alternatives

Alternative’s CF are classified as revenue-based or cost-basedRevenue/Cost – the alternatives consist of cash inflow and cash outflows Select the alternative with the

maximum economic value

Service – the alternatives consist mainly of cost elements Select the alternative with the

minimum economic value (min. cost alternative)

Page 8: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

8 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.1 Evaluating Alternatives

Part of Engineering Economy is the selection and execution of the best alternative from among a set of feasible alternativesAlternatives must be generated from within the organization One of the roles of engineers!

Page 9: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

9 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.1 Evaluating Alternatives

In part, the role of the engineer to properly evaluate alternatives from a technical and economic viewMust generate a set of feasible alternatives to solve a specific problem/concern

Page 10: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

10 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.1 Alternatives

Problem

DoNothing

Alt.1

Alt.2

Alt.m

Analysis

Selection

Execution

If there are m investment proposals, we can form up to 2m mutually exclusive alternatives.This includes DN option.

Page 11: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

11 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.1 Alternatives: The Selected Alternative

Problem Alt.Selected

Execution

Audit and Track

Selection is dependent upon the data, life, discount rate, and assumptions made.

Page 12: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

12 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 Present Worth Approach Equal-Lifes

Simple – Transform all of the current and future estimated cash flow back to a point in time (time t = 0)

Have to have a discount rate before the analysis in started

Result is in equivalent dollars now!

Page 13: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

13 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 THE PRESENT WORTH METHOD

At an interest rate usually equal to or greater than the Organization’s established MARR.

A process of obtaining the equivalent worth of future cash flows to some point in time

– called the Present Worth

Page 14: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

14 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 THE PRESENT WORTH METHOD

P(i%) = P(+) – P(-).

P(i%) = P( + cash flows) + P( - cash flows)

OR, . . .

Page 15: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

15 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 THE PRESENT WORTH METHOD

If P(i%) > 0 then the project is deemed acceptable.

If P(i%) < 0 the project is usually rejected.

If P(i%) = 0 Present worth of costs = Present worth of revenues – Indifferent!

Page 16: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

16 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 THE PRESENT WORTH METHOD

If the present worth of a project turns out to = “0,” that means the project earned exactly the discount rate that was used to discount the cash flows!

The interest rate that causes a cash flow’s NPV to equal “0” is called the Rate of Return of the cash flow!

Page 17: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

17 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 THE PRESENT WORTH METHOD

A positive present worth is a dollar amount of "profit" over the minimum amount required by the investors (owners).

For P(i%) > 0, the following holds true:

Page 18: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

18 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 THE PRESENT WORTH METHOD – Depends upon the Discount Rate Used

The present worth is purely a function of the MARR (the discount rate one uses).If one changes the discount rate, a different present worth will result.

Page 19: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

19 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 THE PRESENT WORTH METHOD

For P(i%) > 0, the following holds true:

Acceptance or rejection of a project is a function of the timing and magnitude of the project's cash flows, and the choice of the discount rate.

Page 20: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

20 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 PRESENT WORTH: Special Applications

Present Worth of Equal Lived AlternativesAlternatives with unequal lives: BewareCapitalized Cost AnalysisRequire knowledge of the discount rate before we conduct the analysis

Page 21: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

21 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 PRESENT WORTH: Equal Lives

Present Worth of Equal Lived Alternatives – straightforward

Compute the Present Worth of each alternative and select the best, i.e., smallest if cost and largest if profit.

Page 22: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

22 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 Equal Lives – Straightforward!

Given two or more alternatives with equal lives….

Alt. 1

Alt. 2

Alt. N

N = for all alternative

s

Find PW(i%) for each alternative then compare

Page 23: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

23 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 PRESENT WORTH: Example

Consider: Machine AMachine B

First Cost $2,500 $3,500Annual Operating Cost 900

700Salvage Value 200 350Life 5 years 5 years

i = 10% per year

Which alternative should we select?

Page 24: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

24 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 PRESENT WORTH: Cash Flow Diagram

Which alternative should we select?

0 1 2 3 4 5

$2,500

A = $900

F5=$200MA

0 1 2 3 4 5

$3,500

F5=$350

A = $700

MB

Page 25: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

25 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 PRESENT WORTH: Solving

PA = 2,500 + 900 (P|A, .10, 5) – 200 (P|F, .01, 5)

= 2,500 + 900 (3.7908) - 200 (.6209) = 2,500 + 3,411.72 - 124.18 = $5,788

PB = 3,500 + 700 (P|A, .10, 5) –

350 (P|F, .10, 5) = 3,500 + 2,653.56 - 217.31 = $5,936SELECT MACHINE A: Lower PW cost!

Page 26: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

26 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 Present Worth of Bonds

Often corporations or government obtain investment capital for projects by selling bonds. A good application of PW method is the evaluation of a bond purchase alternative.If PW < 0 at MARR, do-nothing alternative is selected.A bond is similar to an IOU for time periods such as 5, 10, 20 or more years.

Page 27: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

27 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 Present Worth of Bonds

Each bond has a face value V of $100, $1000, $5000 or more that is fully returned to the purchaser when the bond maturity is reached.Additionaly, bond provide the purchaser with periodic interest payments I (bond dividends) using the bond coupon (interest) b, and c, the number of payment periods per year.

Page 28: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

28 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 Bonds – Notation and Example

(Bond face value)(bond coupon rate) V.bI = ------------------------------------------ = ---- number of payments per year c

At the time of purchase, the bond may sell for more or less than face value. Example:

V = $5,000 (face value) b = 4.5% per year paid semiannually c = 10 years

Page 29: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

29 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 PW Bonds – Example – Continued

The interest the firm would pay to the current bondholder is calculated as:

0.045$5,000( ) $5,000(0.0225)

2$112.50 every 6 months

I

I

The bondholder, buys the bond and will receive $112.50 every 6 months for the life of the bond

Page 30: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

30 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 Example 4.2

Ayşe has some extra money, requires safe investment. Her employer is offering to employees a generous 5% discount for 10-year 5000 YTL bonds tat carry a coupon rate of 6% paid semiannually. The expectation is to match her return on other safe investments, which have averaged 6.7% per year compounded semiannually. (This is an effective rate of 6.81% per year).

Should Ayşe buy the bond?

Page 31: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

31 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 Example 4.2 – Cash-Flow Diagram

A = 150

0 1 2 3 4 …. ….. 19 20

P=??

$5,000

i=3.35%

Find the PW(3.35%) of the future cash flows to the potential bond buyer

Page 32: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

32 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.2 Example 4.2 – Solving

I = (5000)(0.06)/2 = 150 YTL every 6 months for a total of n=20 dividend payments.The semiannual MARR is 6.7/2 = 3.35%, and the purchase price now is – 5000(0.95)= -4750 YTL.Using PW evaluation:PW = -4750 + 150(P/A, 3.35%, 20) + 5000(P/F, 3.35%, 20) = - 2.13 YTL <0Effective rate is slightly less than 6.81% per year since PW<0.She sould not buy.

Page 33: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

33 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 Present Worth Analysis of Different-Life Alternatives

In an analysis one cannot effectively compare the PW of one alternative with a study period different from another alternative that does not have the same study period.This is a basic rule!

Page 34: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

34 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 PRESENT WORTH: Unequal Lives

If the alternatives have different lifes, there are 2 ways to use PW analysis to compare alternatives:

A) The lowest common Multiple (LCM)

B) Study period (planning horizon)

Page 35: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

35 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 PRESENT WORTH: Lowest Common Multiple (LCM) of Lives

If the alternatives have different study periods, you find the lowest common life for all of the alternatives in question.Example: {3,4, and 6} years. The lowest common life (LCM) is 12 years.Evaluate all over 12 years for a PW analysis.

Page 36: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

36 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 PRESENT WORTH: Example Unequal Lives

EXAMPLEMachine A

Machine BFirst Cost $11,000 $18,000Annual Operating Cost 3,500

3,100Salvage Value 1,000 2,000Life 6 years 9 years

i = 15% per year

Note: Where costs dominate a problem it is customary to assign a positive value to cost and negative to inflows

Page 37: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

37 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 PRESENT WORTH: Example Unequal Lives

A common mistake is to compute the

present worth of the 6-year project and compare it to the

present worth of the 9-year project.NO! NO! NO!

Page 38: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

38 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 PRESENT WORTH: Unequal Lives

i = 15% per year

0 1 2 3 4 5 6

$11,000

F6=$1,000

A 1-6

=$3,500

Machine A

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

F6=$2,000

A 1-9

=$3,100

$18,000

Machine B

LCM(6,9) = 18 year study period will apply for present worth

Page 39: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

39 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 Unequal Lives: 2 Alternatives

i = 15% per year

Machine A

LCM(6,9) = 18 year study period will apply for present worth

Cycle 1 for A Cycle 2 for A Cycle 3 for A

6 years

6 years

6 years

Cycle 1 for B Cycle 2 for B

18 years

9 years 9 yearsMachine B

Page 40: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

40 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 Example: Unequal Lives Solving

LCM = 18 years

Calculate the present worth of a 6-year cycle for A

PA = 11,000 + 3,500 (P|A, .15, 6) –

1,000 (P|F, .15, 6) = 11,000 + 3,500 (3.7845) – 1,000 (.4323) = $23,813, which occurs at time 0, 6 and 12

Page 41: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

41 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 Example: Unequal Lives

PA= 23,813+23,813 (P|F, .15, 6)+

23,813 (P|F, .15, 12) = 23,813 + 10,294 + 4,451 = 38,558

0 6 12 18

$23,813 $23,813 $23,813

Machine A

Page 42: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

42 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 Unequal Lives Example: Machine B

Calculate the Present Worth of a 9-year cycle for B

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9

F6=$2,000

A 1-9

=$3,100

$18,000

Page 43: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

43 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 9-Year Cycle for B

Calculate the Present Worth of a 9-year cycle for B

PB = 18,000+3,100(P|A, .15, 9) – 1,000(P|F, .15, 9) = 18,000 + 3,100(4.7716) -

1,000(.2843) = $32,508 which occurs at time 0 and

9

Page 44: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

44 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 Alternative B – 2 Cycles

PB = 32,508 + 32,508 (P|F, .15, 9)

= 32,508 + 32,508(.2843)

PB = $41,750

Choose Machine A

0 9 18

$32,508 $32,508

Machine A: PW =$38,558

Page 45: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

45 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 Unequal Lives – Assumed Study Period

Study Period Approach Assume alternative: 1 with a 5-year life Alternative: 2 with a 7-year life

Alt-1: N = 5 yrs

Alt-2: N= 7 yrs

LCM = 35 yrs

Could assume a study period of, say, 5 years.

Page 46: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

46 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.3 Unequal Lives – Assumed Study Period

Assume a 5-yr. Study periodEstimate a salvage value for the 7-year project at the end of t = 5Truncate the 7-yr project to 5 years

Alt-1: N = 5 yrs

Alt-2: N= 7 yrs

Now, evaluate both over 5 years using the PW method!

Page 47: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

47 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

FUTURE WORTH APPROACH

FW(i%) is an extension of the present worth methodCompound all cash flows forward in time to some specified time period using (F/P), (F/A),… factors or,Given P, the F = P(1+i)N

Page 48: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

48 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

Applications of Future Worth

Projects that do not come on line until the end of the investment period Commercial Buildings Marine Vessels Power Generation Facilities Public Works Projects

Key – long time periods involving construction activities

Page 49: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

49 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

Life Cycle Costs (LCC)

Extension of the Present Worth methodUsed for projects over their entire life span where cost estimates are employedUsed for: Buildings (new construction or

purchase) New Product Lines Commercial aircraft New automobile models Defense systems

Page 50: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

50 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

Life Cycle: Two General Phases

TIME

Cost-$

Acquisition Phase

Operation Phase

Cumulative Life Cycle Costs

Page 51: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

51 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST ANALYSIS

CAPITALIZED COST- the present worth of a project that lasts forever.Government ProjectsRoads, Dams, Bridges (projects that possess perpetual life)Infinite analysis period

Page 52: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

52 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 Derivation for Capitalized Cost

Start with the closed form for the P/A factor

Next, let N approach infinity and divide the numerator and denominator by (1+i)N

(1 ) 1

(1 )

N

N

iP A

i i

Page 53: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

53 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 Derivation - Continued

Dividing by (1+i)N yields

Now, let n approach infinity and the right hand side reduces to….

11

(1 )NiP A

i

Page 54: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

54 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 Derivation - Continued

1 AP A

i i

Or,

CC(i%) = A/i

Page 55: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

55 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST

Assume you are called on to maintain a cemetery site forever if the interest rate = 4% and $50/year is required to maintain the site.

Find the PW of an infinite annuity flow

1 2 3 4 5 ..

N=inf.

A=$50/yr

P = ?

…………………..

Page 56: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

56 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST

P0 = $50[1/0.04]

P0 = $50[25] = $1,250.00

Invest $1,250 into an account that earns 4% per year will yield $50 of interest forever if the fund is not touched and the i-rate stays constant.

Page 57: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

57 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST: Endowments

Assume a wealthy donor wants to endow a chair in an engineering department.

The fund should supply the department with $200,000 per year for a deserving faculty member.

How much will the donor have to come up with to fund this chair if the interest rate = 8%/yr.

Page 58: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

58 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST: Endowed Chair

The department needs $200,000 per year.

P = $200,000/0.08 = $2,500,000

If $2,500,000 is invested at 8% then the interest per year = $200,000

The $200,000 is transferred to the department, but the principal sum stays in the investment to continue to generate the required $200,000

Page 59: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

59 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

EXAMPLECalculate the Capitalized Cost of a project that has an initial cost of $150,000. The annual operating cost is $8,000 for the first 4 years and $5000 thereafter. There is an recurring $15,000 maintenance cost each 15 years. Interest is 15% per year.

4.4 Capitalized Cost Example

Page 60: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

60 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

$4,000

0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 15 30 ………

$150,000

$8,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000 $15,000

“i”=15%/YR

N=

How much $$ at t = 0 is required to fund this project?

The capitalized cost is the total amount of $ at t = 0, when invested at the interest rate, will provide annual interest that covers the future needs of the project.

4.4 Cash Flow Diagram

Page 61: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

61 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST - Example Continued

1. Consider $4,000 of the $8,000 cost for the first four years to be a one-time cost, leaving a $4,000 annual operating cost forever.P0= 150,000 + 4,000 (P|A, .15, 4) =

$161,420

2.855

Page 62: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

62 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST - Continued

Recurring annual cost is $4,000 plus the equivalent annual of the 15,000 end-of-cycle cost.

…….0 15 30 45 60 ……..

Take any 15-year period and find the equivalent annuity for that period using the F/A factor.

Page 63: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

63 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST: One Cycle

Take any 15-year period and find the equivalent annuity for that period using the F/A factor

$15,000

A for a 15-year period

0 15 30 45 60 ……..

…….

Page 64: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

64 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST

2. Recurring annual cost is $4,000 plus the equivalent annual of the 15,000 end-of-cycle cost.

A= 4,000 + 15,000 (A|F, .15, 15)

= 4,000 + 15000 (.0210) = $5,315

Recurring costs = $5,315/i = 5,315/0.15 =$35,443/yr

Page 65: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

65 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.4 CAPITALIZED COST

Capitalized Cost = 161,420 + 5315/.15

= $196,853Thus, if one invests $196,853 at time t = 0, then the interest at 15% will supply the end-of-year cash flow to fund the project so long as the principal sum is not reduced or the interest rate changes (drops).

Page 66: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

Another ExampleA wealthy businessman wants to start a permanent fund for supporting research directed toward sustainability. The donor plans to give equal amounts of money for each of the next 5 years, plus one now(i.e six donations) so that $100,000 per year can be withdrawn each year forever, beginning in year 6. If the fund earns interest at a rate of 8% per year, how much money must be donated each time?

66 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

Page 67: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

67 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

4.6 USING EXCEL FOR PW ANALYSIS

General format to determine the PW is;

PW = P – PV (i%,n,A,F)When different-life alternatives are evaluated using LCM; develop NPV functionPW = P + NPV(i%,year_1_CF_cell:last_year_CF_cell)

Page 68: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

68 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

Summary: Present Worth

• PW represents a family of methods

• Annual worth

• Future Worth

• Capitalized Cost

• Life-cycle cost analysis – application

• Bond Problems – application

Page 69: By Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ahmet ÖZTAŞ Gaziantep University Department of Civil Engineering CHP IV-PRESENT WORTH ANALYSIS CE 533 - ECONOMIC DECISION ANALYSIS

69 / 68CE533 - PW Analysis

End of Chapter 4