Bus 411

DAY 18

Agenda

A Philosophy of education Grading in this Class Quick way to an A Dell Computer Case study Team work

Send me your presentation at least 30 min prior to class

All presentation will be uploaded to class slides directory for further use and evaluation .

teams Team 1

J. Harbison N. Lozier M. Martin

Team 2 C. Brusig C. Pennine T. Nhundu J. Jalbert

Team 3 K. Beaulieu M. Doucette D. Lemon

Timeline March 23

Team 1 Case Study Two Dell Computer Case study team work

March 26-30 Spring Break April 3

Team 2 Case Study Three PepsiCo Case study team work

April 6 Team 3 Case Study Four Molson Coors

Brewing Company Case study team work

April 10 First round scores received Team 1 Case Study Five Hershey

Foods Corporation Case study team work

April 13 (Friday the 13th)

Team 2 Case Study Six Kellogg Company

Case study team work

April 17 Team 3 Case Study Seven Freddo (Ice

Cream Co.) Case study team work

April 20 Second round Scores received Team 1 Case Study 19 JetBlue Airlines Case study team work

April 24 Team 2 Case Study 20 AirTran Airways Case study team work

April 27 Team 3 Case Study 21 USA Truck Case study team work

Last 3 cases are student choice May1 and 4

May 8 in Class Final exam

Grading in this class All assessment guides/rubrics for all assignments and exams were determined prior to the

class starting. Most of the assessment metrics are documented in the syllabus. All grades are posted in WebCT Grade calculation (from Syllabus)

Mid Term Exam (Chapter 1-9) 15% Final Exam (Chaps 1-9 and Cases) 25% Assignments (5 @ 5%) 25% Case Presentations 25% Pre-professional Conduct 10%

If you want to know what you current grade is GO to WebCT and DO the math Midterm Grades were reported Feb 21 (you got them a month later)

(Assignment 1+2+3)/3 = Midterm grade Any of you that were missing anything received a midterm warning

Grading in ALL of my class is objective and dispassionate Assessment ALLWAYS supports the grade assigned

A 90 - 100 % B 80 - 89 % C 70 - 79 % D 60 - 69 % F 0 - 59 %

A Philosophy of Education Secondary Education

Bloom level 1 (mostly) with some level 2 exposure

100 level course Bloom level 1 & 2

200 level course Bloom level 2 & 3 & 4

300 level course Bloom level 3 & 4 & 5

400 level course (and graduate school) Bloom 4 & 5 & 6

The practice of Strategic Management is at Bloom level 4, 5 & 6 Chapter 1-9 was Bloom 2, 3, 4 & 5; so was the midterm My job is to get you to those higher level of cognitive ability Case Study analysis exposes you to level 4, 5 & 6 cognitive abilities Final will be be level 2-6

The business management program is beginning to use Bloom taxonomy which is one of the most widely accepted models for student outcome assessment in higher education. The eCommerce program is based on Blooms taxonomy from the very beginning

Bribe List (2007) 2007 BMW M6 1947 HD FLH “knucklehead” 2007 Ford Shelby Cobra GT500 2007 Audi R8 Redneck Engineering Chopper

“curves frame” Waltz HardCore Chopper 1950 Buick RoadMaster Convertible

Case Presentation AnalysisCompany: Date:

Presenting Team Members:Place comments after each rating. Ratings (circle the appropriate numbers).

CONTENT Poor Below Average

Average AboveAverage

Superior

1. Mission and Vision Statement 1 2 3 4 5

2. Thoroughness, accuracy, and depth of external analysis

1 2 3 4 5

3. Thoroughness, accuracy, and depth of internal analysis

1 2 3 4 5

4. Identification and evaluation of alternative strategies using matrices

1 2 3 4 5

5. Quality, quantity, feasibility, and relevance of recommendations

1 2 3 4 5

6. Justification and support for recommendations 1 2 3 4 5

DELIVERY

1. Organization of presentation 1 2 3 4 5

2. Professionalism of presentation 1 2 3 4 53. Use of visuals and color 1 2 3 4 5

4. Communication skills of team 1 2 3 4 5

5. Use of time (40 min presentation) 1 2 3 4 5

6. Handling of questions (up to 10 minutes) 1 2 3 4 5

OVERALL EVALUATION: 1 2 3 4 5

Numeric Score = 40 + (Avg * 12)

Peer Review for Case studies

Put your name and your team members’ names in the spaces provided, one name at the top of each column.

Names:

Ratings:

On time for all group meetings:

Helped keep the group cohesive:

Number of useful ideas contributed:

Quantity of work done:

Quality of work done:

+ + + +

Add Total Scores Here:

In rating yourself and your team members, use a one- to five-point scale, where 5 = superior, 4 = above average, 3 = average, 2 = below average, and 1 = really weak. Add the scores to obtain a total score for yourself and the other group members. Put any comments you like on the bottom or back of this page. Fold this sheet when you complete the ratings below. If you receive a poor rating on this evaluation, your final case average will be lowered one letter grade. A superior rating may add points to the final case average.