Burnsville, Eagan, Minnesota 2012 Voters Guide

2012

In this guide you will fi nd questionnaires completed by candidates from all city

and state races within the Sun Thisweek Burnsville/Eagan

coverage area.

Don’t forget to vote on November 6.

In Burnsville, Mayor Elizabeth Kautz is being challenged by Jerry Wil-lenburg. Four candidates are competing for two open council seats: Steve Cherney, Bruce Johnson, Suzanne Nguyen and incumbent Mary Sherry. In Eagan, City Council members Meg Tilley and Cyndee Fields are run-ning unopposed. Information on them is in the A section of today’s Sun Thisweek newspaper. Candidates for legislative seats: Senate District 51 (Republican Ted Daley, incumbent, vs. DFLer Jim Carlson). Senate District 56 (Republican Dan Hall, incumbent, vs. DFLer Leon Thurman). House District 51A (Republican Diane Anderson, incumbent, vs. DFLer Sandra Masin). House District 51B (Republican Doug Wardlow, incumbent, vs. DFLer Laurie Halverson). House District 56A (Republican Pam Myhra, incumbent, vs. DFLer Dave Jensen). House District 56B (Republican Roz Peterson vs. DFLer Will Morgan). Ten candidates are running for four seats on Burnsville-Eagan-Savage District 191 School Board. Their questionnaire responses appear inside the A section of today’s Sun Thisweek newspaper. Also inside the A section are responses from candidates for the District 5 seat on the Dakota County Board of Commissioners: incumbent Liz Work-man and Dave Giles. More election information is at www.burnsville.org, www.cityofeagan.com, and www.sos.state.mn.us.

2B October 26, 2012 Burnsville/Eagan Voters Guide

Burnsville MayorBurnsville MayorElizabeth Kautz (incumbent) Burnsville mayor Age: 65 Address: 12501 Nicollet Ave. No. 406 Occupation: Elected Official – Mayor, city of Burnsville Family: Husband David Kautz (de-ceased Sept. 1, 2010), son Kyle, 37, lives in Portland, Ore., son Kevin, 36, married to Erica and living in Alisa Viejo, Calif. Qualifications: I hold a B.A. from St. Catherine University, an M.A. from Al-fred Adler Institute of Chicago, created the first pastoral ministry at St. John the Baptist Catholic Church in Savage, owned a business, grew the business and sold the business. Seventeen years as mayor, two years on the City Council, serve on many boards of directors, past president of the U.S. Conference of Mayors, chair of the Council of Regents for St. Mary’s Univer-sity. I have earned the trust of many heads of industries, which is important for put-ting Burnsville on decision-makers’ radar screen for business expansion and location. 1) Why are you running for office and why should people vote for you? We are at a critical point inside City Hall. Our police chief is retiring in Decem-ber, our city manager is retiring in April of 2013 and major employers are discuss-ing expansion activities. This requires ex-perience, wisdom, knowledge and trust to ensure the smooth transitions inside City Hall, and employers trust that they have someone with experience as mayor. It is imperative that we continue the excellent direction that the city is headed with a strong financial position. We hold a Aaa bond/credit rating, the best any institu-tion can receive, and we have reduced our debt over 50 percent since I took office. 2) Has the city of Burnsville achieved a proper balance between city services, spending and taxes? What, if any, services do you think should be improved, added or curtailed? The city at this time has achieved the balance between city service, spending and taxes. We live in a very organic envi-ronment; it changes as factors change and we have to address service demands and revenues. Property maintenance is an is-sue we are addressing with fees and not property taxes. Police and fire is always in high demand; we must continue to evalu-ate service delivery yearly and make prop-er adjustments to ensure the safety of our community. Continue to fund our Infra-

structure Trust Fund to ensure we pay for our road reconstruction and rehabilita-tion as we go without adding debt. 3) Has the city taken adequate steps to sustain its vitality as it ages? Do you have any ideas for making sure properties are well-maintained and for promoting devel-opment and redevelopment? We have been proactive ensuring that our community is vital and competitive. We are encouraging property owners to comply with property maintenance regu-lations. We have worked with our citizens to enact fees to address property mainte-nance issues. We are a member of Great-erMSP, an organization that is attract-ing new businesses to our region. We are inviting business leaders to visit our city and experience what we have to offer. We are working with our school district and higher education to ensure that we have the right knowledge base and skill sets that employers need to fill their job re-quirements. 4) More than three years after it opened, has the Burnsville Performing Arts Center proved beneficial to the city? Why or why not? How could it be improved? The Performing Arts Center is a great amenity and asset to our community. It is driving traffic to our hotels, restaurants and retailers. Businesses have a beautiful venue for their corporate meetings and trade shows. Our community is enjoying the performances and events at the center. Each year of building its customer and client base, this new business is outper-forming its business plan. Performers and talent managers are discovering the PAC and liking it. The BPAC Commission is working on improving service delivery and product sales. The management com-pany is balancing dance competitions, performances and numerous other activi-ties at the PAC. 5) Are there other major issues facing the city? How would you address them? The 1,700 acres in the Minnesota River Quadrant is our next frontier for redevelopment. We have set the table by working with property owners to rezone the area. We have achieved enabling leg-islation to enact tax-increment financing. We are working with property owners to correct the soils and make the properties buildable. We live in a competitive envi-ronment. We are proactively extending invitations to business leaders to visit our community to consider our city for their next location. We have built a network of trusting relationships with leaders. Main-taining a continuity of excellence in a po-litical environment is a challenge.

ElizabethKautz

Jerry Willenburg, Burnsville mayor Age: 56 Address: 13101 Thom-as Ave. Occupation: Manager. contract management company Family: Wife Joanna, daughters Ni-cole, 20, and Amber, 17. Qualifications: Community: 2009 program director, “Feeding our Future” sponsored by Sodexo Foundation; ex-ecutive director, BRAVO (Burnsville Restaurant Alliance Volunteer Organi-zation); River Hills Church, Burnsville, former member of the Church Council, former member of the SPPR Commit-tee, former chairperson of the PR/Com-munication Committee. Professional: certified instructor and registered proctor for “ServSafe” National Restaurant Association Edu-cational Foundation; district training coordinator for Sodexo; graduate of the Dale Carnegie Leadership Training for Managers; certified retail manager, School of Retail Management-Sodexo University; SEED member (SEED is the nationwide sustainability program for Sodexo); associate of arts degree in sales and marketing. 1) Why are you running for office and why should people vote for you? I believe that we have projects in our city that have been built but have not been working effectively, with no ap-parent plans to improve performance. I have plans that will grow our residen-tial population and expand our business community thereby expanding our tax base so that there will be less pressure shared by a larger group. My focus will be on fixing the things that are broken, and improving the things that are al-ready good. Our current mayor has been in office for nearly two decades, and I believe that it is time for fresh perspec-tives in our City Hall. 2) Has the city of Burnsville achieved a proper balance between city services, spending and taxes? What, if any, ser-vices do you think should be improved, added or curtailed? For me it is not as much about bal-ance as it is about the things that the city has chosen to spend the taxpayer’s money on. First I believe that the city should be focused on providing the es-sential services that our residents rely upon us for, like police, fire, infrastruc-ture of the city, maintenance of the

streets and so forth. Our city serves us better when it spends our money on the things that serve the entire community and not on special interest projects that have the participation of a small frac-tion of our residents. 3) Has the city taken adequate steps to sustain its vitality as it ages? Do you have any ideas for making sure properties are well-maintained and for promoting devel-opment and redevelopment? We need to find ways to attract new residents to Burnsville, specifi-cally young families that are growing, and looking for a vibrant community to grow with. If we grow our popula-tion with families that are looking to Burnsville for their future, there will be expanded needs that will naturally spark the growth of the development that these young families need. It is critical for the city to encourage devel-opers, professionals, to take an interest in Burnsville and to find ways to sup-port them in their efforts in building and promoting the future of Burnsville. Supporting development is different than trying to control the development, which has been the process for the last decade. 4) More than three years after it opened, has the Burnsville Performing Arts Center proved beneficial to the city? Why or why not? How could it be im-proved? This project continues to cost the city approximately $1.7 million a year in op-erational costs and to maintain the an-nualized debt load. A viable option is to sell the PAC and use the money from the sale to pay down the debt on the facility. This would reduce the debt and interest on that part of the debt, and eliminate the operational losses that exist today. The beauty of this is we will still have it as an asset of the city, but owned by professionals. To simply declare it to be a success does not make it so. 5) Are there other major issues facing the city? How would you address them? According to the 2000 and 2010 cen-suses the population of Burnsville grew by just 79 people. During this same time there were nearly 600 new housing units added in Burnsville. This has saturated the real estate market in Burnsville, which has further driven down our home values in an already difficult economy. We must develop a marketing plan that will promote Burnsville throughout the Twin Cities area to grow our popula-tion. The same must be done to fill the vacant business and retail space that sits empty today.

JerryWillenberg

Burnsville/EaganVoters Guide October 26, 2012 3B

Burnsville City Council (two open seats)Burnsville City Council (two open seats)Steven Cherney Age: 62 Address: 408 E. 135 St. Occupation: Local busi-ness owner; branch account manager for OneMain Fi-nancial; retired AT&T man-ager of State Government Affairs Family: Married with three children and nine grandchildren Qualifications: I have a master’s degree in public administration, and bachelor’s and associate’s degrees from the University of Nebraska. I have worked in both profit and nonprofit leadership positions, and in gov-ernment and private-sector positions. I have served Burnsville as a planning commission-er, City Council member and in various vol-unteer positions, including Burnsville Fire Muster board member, certified emergency response volunteer, and Minnesota Volun-teer Network member. 1) Why are you running for office and why should people vote for you? I will support efforts to keep city costs low, and I will apply my “out-of-the-box” think-ing to solving issues. Because of my previous experience in appointed and elected posi-tions, I can hit the ground running. My core belief is that government at all levels should focus on providing services and facilities that we otherwise cannot provide for individu-ally: police, fire, roads, sewer, water, etc. I will vote to restrain unnecessary spending, and I will work with and support the other council members in that effort. I will listen to the citi-zens of Burnsville and work on their behalf. 2) Has the city of Burnsville achieved a proper balance between city services, spending and taxes? What, if any, services do you think should be improved, added or curtailed? The current AAA bond rating is an excel-lent measure of the city’s success at balancing the costs and services, city needs, and taxes. I will support efforts to keep costs down and to find new ways to reduce spending. I will lobby to review the costs of city services and to explore privatization options. 3) Has the city taken adequate steps to sustain its vitality as it ages? Do you have any ideas for making sure properties are well-maintained and for promoting development and redevelopment? The fact that Burnsville is landlocked poses challenges, requiring creative ap-proaches to revitalization efforts. I am eager to contribute to those efforts. The city needs to find ways to avoid being an obstacle when property owners want to improve their prop-erties. Zoning laws should be examined so the city can advance a healthy, friendly at-titude toward property improvement. The city should be a facilitator, not an obstacle to

improvement. On other matters, we must ad-dress issues with water treatment and quality. 4) More than three years after it opened, has the Burnsville Performing Arts Center proved beneficial to the city? Why or why not? How could it be improved? The PAC is a perfect example of the gov-ernment using our tax dollars as if it were a private investor, rather than a provider of our basic city needs. And while the PAC does provide a cultural element to Burnsville, it has yet to be a financial advantage to our community. We continue to apply thousands of dollars annually from our general fund balance to offset costs. We need to be active-ly marketing the facility to introduce private enterprise and market-force advantages. 5) Are there other major issues facing the city? How would you address them? Burnsville needs to find ways to attract new families. We need to promote a business-friendly, family-friendly community by being attuned to what taxpayers want, while being strong enough to say “no” to ideas that are not right for the city. I will encourage the council to think “outside the box,” to think creatively about ways to enhance the city’s attractiveness to new families and businesses. I will say “no” to increasing costs to taxpay-ers and “no” to unnecessary government in-trusions. I will say “yes” to ideas that reduce costs, improve services, increase the city’s vi-tality, and promote a cooperative attitude.

Bruce Johnson Age: 47 Address: 2504 Crest-mount Lane Occupation: Account manager Family: Married Qualifications: I have been a member of and have volunteered for Habitat for Humanity, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, the Minnesota Historical So-ciety and the Civil War Trust. Constitution Party of Minnesota congressional district chairman. I have also been treasurer and a volunteer for various campaigns. 1) Why are you running for office and why should people vote for you? I will listen to and work hard for the citi-zens of Burnsville. I have been a Burnsville resident since 1995. I have experience as an operations manager, overseeing a large staff. This involves balancing a budget, hiring em-ployees, processing payroll and daily opera-tions. I am a hard-working individual who believes in fiscal responsibility and account-ability. 2) Has the city of Burnsville achieved a proper balance between city services, spending and taxes? What, if any, services do you think

should be improved, added or curtailed? Mostly it has; we need to cut out waste-ful and unnecessary spending and become more internally efficient. I believe we can re-main at our current service levels with a zero tax increase. We need to create cooperative agreements with surrounding communities to reduce cost by consolidating services. 3) Has the city taken adequate steps to sustain its vitality as it ages? Do you have any ideas for making sure properties are well-maintained and for promoting development and redevelopment? No, we need to set more redevelopment goals for our community. First of all, we need to enforce the existing property codes for maintaining properties in our city. I would support stronger codes to keep the proper-ties maintained. We need to develop more plans for senior housing in our community. I would also support further development of the Minnesota River Quadrant area and the creation of a Burnsville Port Authority along the Minnesota River. 4) More than three years after it opened, has the Burnsville Performing Arts Center proved beneficial to the city? Why or why not? How could it be improved? It has benefited the city by allowing people in our community to see shows and events closer to home and supporting the local community. However, with the contin-ued losses and the taxpayer burden on this facility, we would have to look at an entirely new concept for this facility to work. We need to look at transferring this facility to the private-owner sector, which would have the funds and ability to make the necessary changes to make it work. 5) Are there other major issues facing the city? How would you address them? Building upon our business community and creating more jobs. We need to draw in more businesses to fill the commercial prop-erties that are still vacant in our community. We may need to lift some restrictions and lower fees to attract those businesses to the area. The future of Burnsville is now; we need to move forward with further develop-ment of the Minnesota River Quadrant and future business developments in the commu-nity.

Suzanne Nguyen Age: 50 Address: 14717 White Oak Drive Occupation: Speech/language clinician Family: Husband, Son Nguyen, physician at Park Nicollet Clinic in Burns-ville; daughter, Anna, third-grader at Echo Park Elementary School in Burns-

ville Qualifications: Bachelor of science in speech and hearing science and minor in psychology, University of Minnesota; master of arts in communication disor-ders, University of Minnesota. I have worked for over 15 years as an educator for the Minneapolis Public Schools. I vol-unteer as a coordinator for the Art Ad-venture Program at Echo Park Elemen-tary School. 1) Why are you running for office and why should people vote for you? I decided to run for City Council be-cause it is an excellent opportunity to get involved with our community and to serve the people of Burnsville. My strength is communication. I will seek to listen, un-derstand and respect. I am very positive and I believe in the power of collabora-tive spirit. When we are united, we can be amazing. I love Burnsville and truly believe it is one of the best cities to live and raise families in America. If elected, I will strive to maintain and improve on the quality of life for all citizens of Burnsville. 2) Has the city of Burnsville achieved a proper balance between city services, spending and taxes? What, if any, services do you think should be improved, added or curtailed? Every year the city struggles to find a balance between services, spending and taxes. Burnsville has accomplished this task admirably as reflected by its high-est bond rating of Aaa by Moody. The proposed budget and tax levy for 2013 is fiscally sound. To achieve this balance, our city leaders recommend eliminating the vacant deputy city manager position and postponing payments to emerald ash borer and the parks capital and in-frastructure trust funds. While the effect on these financial maneuvers is negligible short-term, our citizens must realize that eventually funding must resume or we will lose services. 3) Has the city taken adequate steps to sustain its vitality as it ages? Do you have any ideas for making sure properties are well-maintained and for promoting devel-opment and redevelopment? We continue to make improvements to our city to keep it competitive as it ages. An example of this is the redevelopment of downtown Burnsville, also known as Heart of the City. Currently, our city leaders are working on measures to ad-dress property maintenance. The pro-posed plan is to hire inspectors and con-tractors to inspect rental properties and to proactively canvass neighborhoods. The cost will be covered by licensing fee and

StevenCherney

BruceJohnson

SuzanneNguyen

See NGUYEN, 4B


not tax revenue. Finally, we are a member of Greater MSP, which is a private-public partnership, whose mission is to stimulate economic growth and business develop-ment. 4) More than three years after it opened, has the Burnsville Performing Arts Center proved beneficial to the city? Why or why not? How could it be improved? The Burnsville Performing Arts Center continues to improve our economic posi-tion in business development and tour-ism. We are witnessing new buildings be-ing built and others being bought and a continuation of new businesses looking to enter or entering downtown Burnsville. When tourists arrive for dance competi-tions, entertainment, weddings or other special events, our hotels, restaurants and shops all benefit by the BPAC being here. Our quality of life has been enhanced with a wide variety of offerings at the BPAC as well as new amenities and busi-nesses available to us with a revitalized downtown area. 5) Are there other major issues facing the city? How would you address them? Property maintenance is a high priority for 2013 to ensure Burnsville maintains high quality housing and business proper-ties. Also, a new interchange for County Road 5 at Highway 13 is being planned to accommodate increasing traffic demand and to decrease the number of crashes. This is a $45 million project, a burden the city will share with Dakota County. In ad-dition, we are at the initial stage of dis-cussion regarding redevelopment of the Minnesota River Quadrant. Finally, Mn-

DOT proposes to construct sound walls on both the west and east sides of I-35, south of Buck Hill.

Mary Sherry (incumbent) Age: 72 Address: 1504 Chateaulin Lane Occupation: Retired owner of an economic development research business. Burnsville City Council member Family: Three married children; four grandchildren Qualifications: B.A., Dominican Univer-sity, River Forest, Ill; MBA, University of St. Thomas, St. Paul; 25 years in economic development. A 36-year resident of Burns-ville. Served in many volunteer capacities in schools, and the community, including the Heart of the City Steering Committee. Past member of Mary, Mother of the Church Fi-nance and Personnel Council. Board mem-ber of the Burnsville Community Foun-dation. Served two terms on Burnsville’s Planning Commission. Dakota Communi-cations Center (911) board member. Metro Cities Housing and Economic Development Committee member. League of Minnesota Cities Strengthening Local Economies Com-mittee member. Burnsville City Council member since 2009. 1) Why are you running for office and why should people vote for you? I am running to ensure an effective, col-laborative City Council. When I took office in 2009, the combative tone changed. I am

able to take a firm stand on what I believe is right, yet I respect others’ opinions — coun-cil members’ and citizens’ alike. Further-more, I do my homework. At each council regular meeting, we vote on items that affect the lives of Burnsville’s citizens and set its course for the future. My record shows I ask questions of staff, of applicants, visit sites and do whatever necessary to make an in-formed, fact-based, common sense decision for the common good. 2) Has the city of Burnsville achieved a proper balance between city services, spending and taxes? What, if any, services do you think should be improved, added or curtailed? The balance is good … for now. Balanc-ing requires constant fine tuning, however. Council relies heavily on information pre-sented by staff, and the five-year planning helps anticipate needs before they get out of control and upset the balance. The unexpect-ed will always arise, but when basic services are adequately funded, the surprises can be managed. The city’s age, as well as an eco-nomic downturn, compounded by troubles in the housing market, have led to deterio-ration of many residential properties. The revised property maintenance code will help. But it must be enforced. I want to make sure that gets the necessary funding. 3) Has the city taken adequate steps to sustain its vitality as it ages? Do you have any ideas for making sure properties are well-maintained and for promoting development and redevelopment? Updated sign and liquor ordinances and a revised property code are recent measures the city has taken to sustain its vitality and strengthen business. The new interchange at Highway 13 and County Road 5 will make the Minnesota River Quadrant develop-

ment a reality. Full development will involve many small decisions that will guide us to the goal of the highest and best use of that land. We must be flexible so existing businesses can thrive in the interim. At the same time we must hold property owners accountable when they create hardships for our residents and tarnish the city image. 4) More than three years after it opened, has the Burnsville Performing Arts Center proved beneficial to the city? Why or why not? How could it be improved? The BPAC is not a bad thing. It is a beauti-ful building, and the management is doing a good job in booking many events — large and small, ranging from entertainment to dance competitions to business meetings. The cost of running it is still higher than I would like, but the BPAC Commission is do-ing an outstanding job of addressing these costs and finding ways to increase revenues to the city. As a rental facility, the BPAC’s limitations are clearly drawn. The challenge is to make the facility run as efficiently as possible and draw patrons from outside our city limits. 5) Are there other major issues facing the city? How would you address them? A major concern I have is the transition in leadership of the city staff. This staff is creative, competent and caring. The cul-ture is extraordinary, and Burnsville’s citi-zens should be proud of the tremendous productivity of these public servants. In 2009, when the budget was hammered by falling property values, the staff found ways to do more with less. That mentality continues to this day. To the extent that it can, the next council must encourage this culture as the leaders in this organization retire.

NGUYEN, from 3B

Senate District 51Senate District 51Jim Carlson, DFL, Senate District 51 Age: 65 Address: 1247 Carlson Lake Lane, Eagan Occupation: Retired 3M engineer Family: Wife Gayle Carlson, Ger-man teacher; adult daughter Lindsay Carlson, attorney in Los Angeles; adult son Dave Carlson, software engineer Qualifications: Registered engineer (me-chanical), Minnesota. Thirty years in tech-nical and management positions in two Fortune 500 companies gaining manufactur-ing, project engineering, capital equipment and International manufacturing experi-ence. Retired in 2002 and served from 2007 to 2011 in the Minnesota Senate. Served on the Senate Education Policy Committee; the Business, Industry and Jobs Committee; the Energy, Utilities, Technology and Commu-

nications Committee; the State and Local Government Operations and Oversight Committee, and vice chair of the Transportation Policy and Finance Committees. Also served on the Subcommittee for Workforce Development, and on the subcom-mittees for Transit, Gaming, and Air-ways, Waterways and Railways. 1) An August report from the Min-

nesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts? The total 2014-2015 deficit is far greater than $1.1 billion. The Legislature took $2.7 billion from 2012-2013 school funding to fund other spending, without a plan to pay it back. They drained reserve funds and “pawned” future tobacco revenues to fund current obligations. The “balanced budget” postponed education spending into the next

biennium. The now-estimated $4.5 billion 2014-2015 deficit is not solvable with cuts. We must address the last 10 years of tricks and gimmicks that has severely hurt Minne-sota. It will take a mix of reforms and new revenue to fix the structural imbalance and honestly address debts. 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a dis-cussion on tax reform in the 2013 session. What if any reforms do you support? I support the governor’s plans to institute a fairer taxation system. His idea is to re-quire those who have benefited greatly from our healthy, educated, trained and prosper-ous workforce, to contribute back at a fair rate in order to sustain the capabilities of following generations. Undoing the 10 years of damage caused by continuously spending more than revenues will take more than one session to accomplish. History demonstrates that Minnesota has built an excellent climate for employment and business growth, but

our infrastructure is deteriorating and inad-equate, and our excellent education system has been eroded by unfocused efforts. 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state? The present Legislature squandered a unique opportunity to put people back to work at the lowest cost and highest return possible. During the 2011-2012 session, in-terest rates were at historic lows and con-struction contractors were bidding low just to keep their doors open. A bonding bill re-quires no upfront budget cash and builds du-rable assets such as roads, bridges, schools, water systems and, of course, stadiums. Min-nesota is rated far below surrounding states in debt per capita and has bonding capacity that could be employed to stimulate jobs,

JimCarlson

MarySherry

See CARLSON, 5B


Ted Daley, incumbent, Republican, Senate District 51 Age: 46 Address: 1662 Oakbrooke Cir-cle, Eagan Occupation: CPA Family: wife- Dawn; four chil-dren Qualifications: Married, four children; small-business owner; certified public ac-countant (CPA); West Point graduate, MBA-University of St. Thomas; Iraq and Gulf War veteran; senior economic ad-viser, Provincial Reconstruction Team in Iraq; Lieutenant Colonel, Army Reserve; Certified Fraud Examiner; Jobs & Eco-nomic Growth Committee member, vice-chairman State Government and Veter-ans, Pensions and Sunset Commission member, and K-12 Education Commit-tee member; EAA basketball, soccer and track coach; member, St. John Neumann Church; Cubmaster, Deerwood Elemen-tary. Working in a bi-partisan manner I authored 11 bills that were signed into law in my first term. 1) An August report from the Minneso-ta Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts? This biennium we turned the nearly $5.2 billion deficit left by my opponent and the previous Legislature into a $1.3 billion surplus, according to Minnesota Management and Budget. This surplus can be used, in part, to cover much of the deficit in the next bi-ennium. With a $2 billion, or 6 percent, increase in revenue expected in the next biennium, we can reduce the projected 9 percent growth in spending. We will then be able to focus on priorities like educa-tion and paying back the school shift that

was used by both the current Leg-islature and my opponent and the prior Legislature. 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is propos-ing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 session. What if any reforms do you support? There are some excellent op-portunities for simplifying the tax code to make things easier for

hardworking Minnesota families and businesses. Over the past few decades, the increased complexity of our tax code has made us less competitive in the glob-al economy so simplifying it would help us increase job opportunities here. We should look for revenue-neutral, struc-tural reforms to lower overall tax rates for our families and job creators by reducing the number of exemptions, deductions and credits. We must prioritize spending, reduce government waste and balance the budget without further burdening the tax-payers of Minnesota. 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job cre-ation in the state? The first rule should be that govern-ment does no harm. When he was in the Legislature, my opponent authored a bill to require all Minnesotans to buy a gov-ernment run health plan. Besides taking away your choice of plans, this bill would have eliminated thousands of local jobs at Blue Cross/Blue Shield, Delta Dental and other employers. We need to create a busi-ness climate that encourages job growth in order to help small businesses be more competitive with other states and interna-tionally. My CPA and business experience help me to evaluate the practical impact on business of various government pro-posals. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why

TedDaley

businesses and economic development. The Legislature should immediately consider a bonding bill. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support? Increasing the formula is not as critical as returning funding payments to the agreed-to 90-10 level. Our global competitors know very well that an investment in educating their populations has a high return. The 2011-12 Legislature took $2.7 billion of K-12 school funds to fund other expenditures. In real terms, formula-funding has not kept up with inflation and Minnesota has dropped to levels that threaten the preparedness of our future workforce. Achievement statistics of

high-income families demonstrate the high quality of Minnesota’s classroom experi-ence. The achievement gap demonstrates the overwhelming negative influences external to the classroom that must be addressed. 5) How should Minnesota address its un-met transportation needs in the future? A good transportation system for people and products is a major building block for Minnesota’s economy. The advocacy group, Transportation Alliance, has identified a more than $30 billion shortfall in transporta-tion funding in the next 20 years. The cost of delay is to lose Minnesota’s standing as hav-ing an effective transportation system that is accessible and safe. New federal legislation, signed July 6, 2012, will provide a number of new initiatives to support transportation infrastructure based on state participation. Minnesota has lagged other states on user-

funding of transportation needs tied to fuel use and reaching average is a reasonable goal. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? We agree that returning military and vet-erans deserve far better treatment than they are presently being provided. We agree that some of the most important influencers in a young person’s education experience are their teachers. We disagree that teachers are the cause of the education gap. We disagree that a school must wait for a layoff to re-move poor teachers. Administrators have three-year probationary period to evaluate new teachers and decide if they should be re-hired as tenured teachers. Just as in business-es, administrators have the responsibility to build a case and terminate a tenured teacher for cause.

7) What are other issues of importance to you and what can the Legislature do to ad-dress them? Having already mentioned education and transportation; affordable health care access is another very high priority for individuals and businesses. Under the Minnesota in-surance model, small businesses are paying more for health care than large businesses due to larger risk pools and discounts from providers. Detaching health coverage par-tially or completely from employers would boost small business successes and lead to leveling the playing field for entrepreneurs starting their own businesses. Affordable high education is an impor-tant goal the state needs to address. Student debt, higher education dropout rates and the need for workers in specifically-trained tech-nologies, must be addressed.

CARLSON, from 4B

or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support? Despite the $5.2 billion deficit last session, we were successful in providing a $200 per pupil increase in funding to our schools. This demonstrated our com-mitment to education, which I hope to continue next session. While funding is important, we also need to focus on ac-countability to ensure those dollars are well spent and effective for our kids. I worked on bi-partisan reform efforts with fellow legislators and Governor Day-ton and his staff resulting in the first bill (Teacher Basic Skills Exam) signed into law in 2012 for which I was the chief Sen-ate author. 5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the future? We should address our transporta-tion needs based on performance-based solutions which are best value: high ben-efit options with a low cost. A local ex-ample of this is the Cedar Avenue Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) system. An assistant county engineer agreed this was the best choice for the Cedar Avenue Transitway as a means to reduce congested roadways with fewer community impacts and lower

costs as well as shorter implementation timelines. It also provides the flexibility needed adjust to changing ridership and evolving public needs. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? A quality education for all of our chil-dren is important to everyone. Strong schools today help create a strong econo-my tomorrow. 7) What are other issues of importance to you and what can the Legislature do to address them? My priority and focus since day one has been Minnesota jobs and our econo-my. It remains my top priority. We must continue to reduce government waste and balance the budget without further bur-dening the taxpayers of Minnesota. We need to stay the course and not go back to the same tax and spend pattern that built the record budget deficit created by my opponent. We need to continue re-sponsible budgeting practices that don’t automatically increase welfare programs, which in turn threaten to crowd out prior-ities like education. We should stop mak-ing promises we can’t keep with money we don’t have.

Re-elect

Mary SherryBurnsville City Council

Common Sense for the Common GoodPaid for by the Mary Sherry for Council Committee, 1504 Chateaulin Ln. Burnsville, MN 55337


Sandra Masin, DFL, House District 51A Age: Not provided Address: 1795 Carnelian Lane, Eagan,MN 55122 Occupation: Sales Family: Three children: Rob, Lau-ra, and Randy. Three grandchildren. Qualifications: Minnesota House of Rep-resentatives, 2007-2010; District 191 Com-munications Committee; Dakota County Fair Board; Dakota City Board of Directors; Eagan City Council; University of Minneso-ta Center for Transportation Studies’ Advi-sory Committee; Suburban Transit Author-ity, member and chair; Minnesota Valley Transit Authority, member and chair; Eagan Parks Commission 1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts?

I would work together with my col-leagues and the governor to support a balanced approach to solving our state’s structural budget problems. We should first identify strategic budget cuts and reforms to make government more efficient and save taxpayer dollars. These budget cuts should protect core government functions like education, roads and

bridges. Then we should identify ways to in-crease revenue while making our tax system fairer. Currently, middle class Minnesotans are bearing a larger portion of the tax bur-den than others. All Minnesotans should pay their fair share to get our state budget on a solid footing again. 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a dis-cussion on tax reform in the 2013 session. What if any reforms do you support? I agree with Governor Dayton that tax re-form is necessary. Over the last several years, middle class families have seen their property taxes skyrocket. In addition, the Legislature eliminated the Market Value Homestead Credit in 2011 which will impact the aver-

age homeowner’s property taxes by $202. It is important for our state’s future economic growth that our tax system is fairer and that includes lowering property taxes. 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state? As a former small business owner I know firsthand what small businesses need from our state to grow and thrive which is why I support tax incentives for entrepreneurs to grow their businesses and succeed. In ad-dition, we need to put more money in the pockets of middle-class Minnesotans which is why I will continue to champion policies that will lead to job growth, increasing sala-ries and wages, and lower property taxes. I will create jobs through wise investments in the critical public infrastructure that busi-nesses need to compete in the global econo-my. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support?

As the mother of three Burnsville High School graduates and grandmother of two elementary school students, I know educa-tion is a critical issue for our community and state’s future. In order for our students to be competitive in the global economy they must be well-prepared. That is why I stood up against Republican plans to cut money from our public schools, colleges and univer-sities. I support Governor Dayton’s plan to increase funding for our schools every year. 5) How should Minnesota address its un-met transportation needs in the future? During my tenure as a city council mem-ber, I served as chair of the Minnesota Valley Transit Authority and as chair to the Sub-urban Transit Association. I continued this work in the Legislature where I worked to en-act a transportation act to fund Minnesota’s long-neglected system of roads, bridges and transit including much needed investments on I-35W and Cedar Avenue. It is critical that the state continue to partner with the lo-cal and federal government to invest in our

SandraMasin

House District 51AHouse District 51ADiane Anderson, incumbent, Republican, House District 51A Age: 52 Address: 4295 Eagle Crest Drive, Ea-gan Occupation: Small business owner Family: married, two children Qualifications: Elected state represen-tative 2010; bachelor of science, housing, University of Minnesota; in St. Paul fo-cused on health and human services is-sues to help people with mental illness, chemical dependency, and homelessness; worked on commerce issues and judicial and family law reform. Citizen advocate at the Minnesota legislature for 21 years. 1) An August report from the Minneso-ta Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts? When I am re-elected, I will continue the work we have done to keep moving our state in the right direction. My policies of less government spending without raising taxes is what has produced real results. We did a great job solving the state budget

deficit. The previous Legislature left us with a $6 billion deficit and in the February forecast we had a $1.2 billion surplus. We did not raise taxes, we reduced spending, and the revenues were higher than projected. Let’s not slow down our economic momentum by returning to the failed policies of the past. 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing

a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 ses-sion. What if any reforms do you support? What we need to do is enact business tax reforms. We had two great tax bills that the governor vetoed last session which would have created many jobs in Minnesota. We need to make our state competitive, so businesses will grow here and start their businesses here. If we re-duce taxes for businesses, it will create more jobs and produce more revenue for Minnesota. I do not support raising tax-es. We need people to keep more of their hard earned money so they can spend it. 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job cre-ation in the state? The economy in Minnesota has im-proved since I took office. During the four years before I was elected, when the Democrats were in the majority of the Legislature, the unemployment rate went up. In the last two years since I took of-fice, the unemployment rate in Dakota

County went down from 8 percent to 5 percent and the number of jobs created in Dakota County has increased. In order to do this, we reduced government spending and enacted permit reforms to help busi-nesses get started in Minnesota. We need to reform our business taxes to create more jobs. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education fund-ing or policy reform you support? This is an easy question to answer since I just supported a substantial increase to the funding formula in the last budget, even though we faced a $6.2 billion bud-get deficit. I believe we need to have quali-ty education and our local schools need to receive fair funding from the state. School District 196 had deep cuts the past three years and this year ISD 196 balanced its budget without making any cuts. I sup-port increasing the state’s per-pupil fund-ing. I increased the state funding for K-12 education by providing $100 more per pu-pil, compensatory funding, and literacy aid. 5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the future? We need to have cost-effective transit that moves people and alleviates conges-tion. We should renew the infrastructure and provide money for roads and bridges. We need to reform the distribution for-mula for how the money is allocated to

the road projects. We need to invest public dollars where it does the most good. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? I think we both agree that we need to pay back the education shift. We have both voted in favor of borrowing money from the schools and we did it to resolve the budget. Since we had a budget surplus last year, part of that money went to pay back the education shift automatically. I also voted in favor of a bill that would have given our schools $430 million, to pay back even more of the shift, however, Governor Dayton vetoed the bill. 7) What are other issues of importance to you and what can the Legislature do to address them? My primary goal will be to improve Minnesota’s business climate. To help the economy, I will support less government, fewer government regulations, and permit reform. I support growing private sector jobs. I am endorsed by the business orga-nizations and have a 100 percent voting record with the chamber organizations. The reforms we did are helping to create jobs and the unemployment rate in Min-nesota has improved. We do not need to make the state more uncompetitive by raising taxes. I will advocate for fiscal ac-countability, by holding the line on taxes and prioritizing spending. My website is: dianeandersonforhouse.com.

DianeAnderson

See MASIN, 9B


House District 51BHouse District 51BLaurie Halverson, DFL, District 51B Age: 43 Address: 680 Brockton Curve, Eagan Occupation: Stay at home mom Family: My husband Jason and I have a 4-year-old son, Kai. Qualifications: I graduated with a degree in political science from the College of St. Catherine and attended the Humphrey Institute for Public Affairs at the University of Minnesota. I previously led grassroots and civic en-gagement efforts at Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Minnesota in Eagan. I am an active community volunteer and currently serve as the chair of the Eagan Parks and Recreation Commission and as a director at the Eagan Foundation. 1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts? When Minnesotans are asked, they con-sistently support a balanced approach to budgeting. It is time to confront the fiscal challenges we face by making hard but re-sponsible choices. That’s why I was disap-

pointed when my opponent voted to take money from our schools as yet another budgeting gimmick. We can-not continue to borrow from our future to balance the state budget. With a mix of spending cuts and a fair approach to new revenue generation we can pro-tect the things Minnesotans value most without placing additional burden on middle class Minnesotans.

2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a dis-cussion on tax reform in the 2013 session. What if any reforms do you support? I am a proponent of advancing tax re-form in the 2013 session that will create a fairer and simpler tax code. Broadening the sales tax base and lowering the property tax rate are among the options I would consider to help balance the budget and modern-ize the tax system. I also support lowering property taxes to support small and medium sized business. 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state? Eagan families have had to absorb some tough job losses at some of the large employ-ers that have kept this community growing. However, businesses are continuing to invest in Eagan by expanding new jobs in our com-

munity. It is a priority for me to continue to bring good paying jobs into our communi-ties, and I believe we can support job growth by modernizing the tax system and lowering property taxes that burden our small and medium sized businesses. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support? I believe every student must have access to quality education. Investment in education creates a strong and educated workforce in the future. The quality of education is one of the things that has made Minnesota a great state to live and work but we will fall behind if we do not provide the funding our schools need to provide the best education possible for each student. I support funding reforms that will be used to equip teachers and class-rooms with the tools to meet state education goals. I will work closely with teachers and school districts to look at reforms that make sense for Minnesota. 5) How should Minnesota address its un-met transportation needs in the future? If we take a balanced approach to state budgeting with a mix of spending cuts and new revenue, we can start to catch up on the state’s transportation needs. The quality of our state’s transportation infrastructure is

a critical business, safety and quality of life issue. As we look for solutions, we need to be open to all options – roads, bridges and transit – so that we can find the most cost-effective option. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? My opponent talks about freedom. I also support our fundamental freedoms – for families, individuals and consumers to make their own choices about their lives. 7) What are other issues of importance to you and what can the Legislature do to ad-dress them? I want to go to the Capitol to address the issues that matter to my community. In ad-dition to jobs and education, voters are con-cerned about health care. All Minnesotans deserve access to quality, affordable health care. Working collaboratively, the public and private sectors can find ways to ensure every Minnesotan has access to health care. This will ensure most efficient use of health care resources and provide the best outcomes. The next Legislature must establish a Minne-sota-based health care insurance exchange, which is supported by the state’s business community. We also need to further establish our state’s leadership position in health care by adopting payment reform that preserves access while controlling costs.

LaurieHalverson

HELPED TURN A $5.1

BILLION STATE BUDGET

DEFICIT INTO A $1.2 BILLION

SURPLUSPrepared and paid for by DALEY for SENATE Committee | 3422 Denmark Ave | Eagan, MN 55123

VOTE NOV. 6 FOR:


Senate District 56Senate District 56Dan Hall, incumbent, Republican, Senate District 56 Age: 60 Address: 12936 Portland Ave, Burnsville Occupation: State senator Family: Happily married for 38 years, eight children, seven grandchil-dren Qualifications: two years as state senator, vice chair of environment and natural resources committee; priorities are faith, family and freedom; attend-ed Augsburg College (All-American in hockey); school principal, Minne-apolis YMCA director; founder and CEO of nonprofit Midwest Chaplains;

minister (since 1982); Burnsville Police and Fire chaplain (19 years); youth sports coach (15 years); Open Arms food shelf volunteer coordinator (10 years); youth hockey camp volunteer (24 years); YMCA Youth in Govern-ment volunteer adviser; lifelong Minnesotan; Burnsville resident (since 1991).

1) An August report from the Min-nesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts? The deficit needs to be closed with a combination of spending cuts and growth. My plan is to continue policy changes that will help businesses in Minnesota increase performance, re-

sulting in more jobs and a boost in rev-enue. In the past two years, we took a $6 billion deficit and brought it to a $1 billion surplus. And, we can do much more in the next two years! 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 ses-sion. What if any reforms do you sup-port? Should the governor’s proposals in-clude enhancing businesses and reduc-ing tax burdens, I would undoubtedly support it. Should he propose a $6 bil-lion tax increase, it would not receive my support. Minnesota is already one of the highest taxed states in the na-tion. Higher taxes are not the answer. Minnesota needs lower rates, a broader tax base, and a corporate tax structure that encourages building new business-es and expanding existing businesses.

3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state? We have worked hard to provide tax relief for businesses, decrease overregu-lation and grow the private sector. As we continue to work in these areas we will measure legislation by whether it will help or hurt job growth and cre-ate a positive economic environment in Minnesota. This will make our state an attractive location for investors and venture capitalists to start or expand their businesses. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of edu-cation funding or policy reform you sup-

DanHall

Doug Wardlow, incumbent, Republican, House District 51B Age: 34 Address: 1338 Easter Lane, Ea-gan Occupation: Attorney, business litigation Family: My wife Jenny and I have a 2-year old son, Winston, and a 5-month-old daughter, Annabelle Qualifications: It has been a privi-lege and honor to represent my home-town at the Capitol for the last two years. I grew up in Eagan, attended ISD 196 schools, graduated from Ea-gan High School, and am now raising my family with my wife, Jenny, in Ea-gan. I attended college and law school at Georgetown University. I am an at-torney in private practice with a small law firm, so I understand the law as well as the challenges faced by small businesses. After law school, I clerked for the Minnesota Supreme Court, giv-ing me experiential knowledge of con-stitutional law. As State Representative, I have served on the Taxes Committee, the Property and Local Taxes Division, the Civil Law Committee, and the Ju-diciary Policy and Finance Committee, as well as the Joint House-Senate Sub-committee on Claims. 1) An August report from the Min-nesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts?

Minnesota Management and Budget projects that general fund revenues will increase by approximately $2 billion for the 2014-15 biennium over the cur-rent biennium at current tax rates. What’s more, revenues for the current biennium are exceed-ing expectations. If we simply hold spending flat (no cuts), nat-

urally increasing revenues will generate a surplus of over $2.6 billion – money we can use to repay the school shift and implement tax reform to improve Min-nesota’s business and jobs climate. Fis-cal responsibility works. 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 ses-sion. What if any reforms do you sup-port? Minnesota individuals and business-es pay some of the highest taxes in the nation. This discourages individuals from starting businesses in our state, discourages businesses from expand-ing in our state, and drives businesses to relocate to other states. To generate private-sector job creation and lasting prosperity, I support reforming Minne-sota’s individual income tax by signifi-cantly lowering rates while eliminating special tax preferences. We should also phase-out double-taxation of business income and business property. 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state? Government does not create pros-perity. Minnesotans do. Government should set the conditions for a vibrant

economy and then get out of the way. In addition to improving Minnesota’s individual and business tax climate as discussed in my previous answer, I support reducing the burden of regu-lations, permitting and licensing on job creators. We need to make sure we are investing wisely and sufficiently in education so that our workforce can compete in an increasingly global mar-ketplace. And we need to pass lawsuit reform – including the two bills I chief-authored last session. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of edu-cation funding or policy reform you sup-port? The funding formula is unfair to suburban schools. Last session, we addressed this problem by increasing funding for Eagan and other suburban schools. Consequently, ISD 196 will balance its budget without any cuts for the first time in three years. This is a good start. Going forward, we need to reward excellent schools and teachers with increased funding and pay; keep decisions close to parents and teachers; and focus funding in the classroom. Most importantly, we must attract and retain the best and brightest teachers, because an excellent teacher is the most important factor in a child’s education. 5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the fu-ture? Minnesota should prioritize invest-ment in roads and bridges to meet the demands of our growing population and economy. In addition, we should

work to ensure that MSP remains a vi-tal, international hub airport by mak-ing it as easy as possible for airlines including Delta to expand their opera-tions there. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? My opponent and I agree on the ultimate goal — a vibrant, prosper-ous Minnesota. We disagree on how to get there, because we have very dif-ferent ideas about government. In my view, we cannot overcome challenges with more government spending or more government programs or control. Rather, to build lasting prosperity, we need a limited government that focuses on core functions — law enforcement, education, and providing a safety net, for example. To unleash the job-creat-ing power of free enterprise, we need a government that trusts each of us to pursue our dreams, build our families, and help our neighbors in need. 7) What are other issues of impor-tance to you and what can the Legisla-ture do to address them? Last session, we passed caps on property-tax increases. Unfortunately, the measure was vetoed. I believe it is important to enact such limits in order to encourage fiscal responsibility in lo-cal government. Also, I support reform-ing and limiting the rule-making pro-cess. Too much authority is delegated to unelected executive-branch officials and away from elected representatives who are accountable to the people. Rule-making reform is also necessary to rein-in the size of government and control spending.

DougWardlow

See HALL, 9B


Leon Thurman, DFL, Senate District 56 Age: 71 Address: 1621 W. 140th St., Burns-ville Occupation: Education consul-tant, specialist voice educator, The Leon Thurman Voice Center Family: Eligible bachelor Qualifications: Lived in Minnesota 35 years; Burnsville 22 years. Small business owner. Lifelong teacher. Ed.D. (Doctor of Education degree, music major, theatre mi-nor), University of Illinois, 1977. Teacher for public schools and universities, private colleges, University of Minnesota Medi-cal Center. Founder/founding faculty, The VoiceCare Network and its international continuing teacher-education courses, 1982-present. Post-doctoral study: neurosci-ence of learning/teaching and verbal/non-verbal communication; published education author and consultant. Elected chair, Pre-cinct 17, old DFL Senate District 40, 2010, re-elected 2012. Elected alternate delegate to DFL State Convention, 2010; chair, nomina-tions committee, new DFL Senate District 56; elected delegate to DFL State Conven-tion, 2012. 1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office says a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts? No. Two ways to resolve deficits: cut spending, increase revenue. I’m for both, but no cuts that hurt children and vulnerable people. Cut-spending-only is the Republican way; cut environment protection, Medicaid, health care and other aid for low-income and disabled people, and school funding. Min-nesota’s economy is expanding, now, thus increasing revenue. I will work with Republi-cans who will work with DFLers to balance our budget, end the budget deficits we’ve had, and replenish our rainy day fund. No more gridlock! 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a dis-

cussion on tax reform in the 2013 ses-sion. What if any reforms do you sup-port? I support: Comprehensive review of the Minnesota Tax Code to iden-tify options for simplification and equitable taxes for all income earners, then negotiations. One income tax increase of at least 2 percent on in-dividuals after their first $500,000 of

income. Eliminating tax breaks for wealthy people and large corporations unless they are tied to incentives for settling and/or ex-panding in Minnesota, and providing living-wage jobs. Reporting of all yearly individual and corporate income, regardless of where it originated or where it is deposited, to be subject to Minnesota taxes, credits, and de-ductions (no tax havens). 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state? Jobs are created by increased ‘demand’ for products/services. Optimal demand hap-pens when lots of people have living-wage jobs and know where to buy products and services they need or want. Businesses want to locate where demand will likely be high, well-educated/trained workers are available, shipping is easy, health care is affordable, and quality of life is high. The Legislature can appropriate funds for programs that provide incentives for businesses to start up, locate, and/or expand in Minnesota, with incentives tied to living-wage job-creation goals. Min-nesota Investment Fund does that. Minne-sota Trade Office helps businesses find mar-kets worldwide (eliminated by Republicans!). 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support? The public school per-pupil funding for-mula desperately needs thoughtful restruc-turing so that the needs of Minnesota’s 337 school districts are more clarified and more clearly targeted. The formula’s language also needs to be more understandable. I believe that this process will support a need for in-

LeonThurman

port? I supported an increase in pupil funding two years ago, and I will con-tinue to do whatever it takes to give our Minnesota students the best education we can. However, it takes more than money to achieve excellence in educa-tion. It also takes the commitment and accountability of teachers, parents and students working to achieve a common goal. 5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the fu-

ture? Continuing to maintain and improve our roads and bridges should be a top priority. Distribution of transportation funding needs to be transparent to en-sure light rail and other mass transit used by a relatively small portion of the population is not overly subsidized at the expense of work which benefits the large majority of Minnesotans. We are always exploring innovative financing solutions to Minnesota’s transporta-tion needs. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on?

I believe that my opponent and I share the same goals of having the best education for our students, the safest state possible and a free market econo-my. We want to see more jobs and busi-nesses prosper in Minnesota. How we do that is where the differences between us lie. I believe that the government does not make jobs, but can hinder or help companies by giving them the freedom to expand and enhance their companies without placing on them the undue pressures of high taxation or overregulation. 7) What are other issues of impor-

tance to you and what can the Legisla-ture do to address them? The everyday life of my constituents can be very hard and filled with un-necessary burdens. I want to provide a culture of freedom, where people can express themselves and be in a com-munity that gives instead of takes. The government should help to provide a more peaceful society, whether it’s in business, or everyday life of our fami-lies. I believe in working hard, playing fair, doing the right thing and expect-ing the best of myself and others.

HALL, from 8B

creased school funding that can result in even more effective learning, teaching, admin-istration, and student health. One specific funding reform would be automatic annual inflation-rate increases in the formula. A spe-cific program/funding reform would be sig-nificant human counseling for children and their families, not just career counseling, and schoolwide emotional intelligence and empa-thy education. 5) How should Minnesota address its un-met transportation needs in the future? Immediate transportation need is updat-ing/repair of roads and bridges. Current bond interest rates are very low. The Legisla-ture needs to provide budgetary bonding au-thority ASAP to meet this urgent need. The Minnesota Department of Transportation has a comprehensive Statewide Multimodal Transportation Plan (includes plans for fu-ture rail transit along the I-35W corridor), and related 20-year State Highway Invest-ment Plan. The Metropolitan Council has a comprehensive transportation plan for the metro area that extends to the year 2030. The I-35W Solutions Alliance has been a leader in meeting the transportation needs of the cities through which I-35W passes. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? We agree: marriage benefits society, vot-ing should be fraud-free. We disagree: He be-

lieves marriage is a sacred religious rite that commits one man/one woman to each other. In state government, marriage is a legal com-mitment (a contract) between any two citi-zens who love each other and want a stable relationship. It confers legal responsibilities/privileges and requires a state-issued license. The extent of voter fraud is almost zero. He wants to prevent it with expensive/unneces-sary voter IDs. I see Republican intent to suppress voting among communities that typically vote DFL. Constitutional amend-ments that limit these freedoms and liberties are ludicrous. 7) What are other issues of importance to you and what can the Legislature do to address them? Affordable health care for all Minneso-tans is crucial. Legislature needs to support Gov. Dayton’s development of Minnesota’s health insurance exchange to effect the provi-sions of the Patient Protection and Afford-able Care Act. As the state’s finances stabilize and grow, funding is desperately needed for homeless, disabled, mentally ill, and abused people. We’ve got to get a fist-grip on the physical and mental abuse of women and children, and on the abduction and traffick-ing of Minnesota’s children for sexual exploi-tation. “… the test of a civilization is the way that it cares for its (vulnerable) members.” Pearl S. Buck

transportation infrastructure through transit options like the I-35W Bus Rapid Transit and roads such as the upgrades to Cedar Av-enue. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? Mental health is an issue that needs much more attention, so I appreciate the fact that my opponent spent time working in that area. 7) What are other issues of importance to you and what can the Legislature do to ad-dress them?

The current Legislature’s unwillingness to work together to address important is-sues facing Minnesota like growing jobs and educating a 21st century workforce led to the longest government shutdown in America’s history and is a limiting our state’s ability for future economic growth. With middle class families struggling to get by, Rep. Diane An-derson should not have borrowed $2.4 bil-lion from our students or voted to increase property taxes by $1.3 billion. If elected, I will work with my colleagues to pass a bal-anced budget on time while making sure we are investing in education, growing jobs and lowering property taxes.

MASIN, from 6B


House District 56AHouse District 56A

low; Minnesota Excellence in Public Service Series, fellow; certified public accountant, inactive license; University of St. Thomas, Bachelor of Arts in Business Administra-tion; BHS 1975 graduate. 1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office say a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts?

When I first took office two years ago, MMB forecasted a $6.2 billion 2012/13 bi-ennium state budget deficit. After balancing the 2012/13 budget, with no new taxes and many long-term reforms, MMB’s February 2012 forecast showed a cumulative $1.2 bil-lion surplus for 2012/13. That same report forecast a $2 billion (6 percent) increase in state revenues and a $3 billion (9 percent) in-

Pam Myhra, incumbent, Republican, House District 56A Age: 55 Address: 13220 Elm Lane, Burns-ville Occupation: First-term represen-

tative; certified public accountant, inactive license; teacher, retired Family: Married 31 years to Chuck, three adult children Qualifications: First-term repre-sentative, Capital Investment, Edu-cation Finance, Education Reform, and Tax committee member; Na-tional Conference of State Legisla-tures’ Early Learning Program, fel-

PanMyhra

Dave Jensen, DFL, House District 56A Age: 55 Address: 4993 Credit River Drive, Savage Occupation: Geriatric nurse practitioner, clinical supervisor Family: Married 27 years to wife, Michele; 20-year-old twins – son Sam, daughter Mara Qualifications: I feel that my 30 years of experience in the health care profession have given me the listening and problem-solving skills that I feel would be useful to be an effective legis-lator. 1) An August report from the Min-nesota Budget and Management Office say a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts? Absolutely not! All options for balancing the budget must be on the table. We need to spend smart. Every program must be evaluated. If it is not adequately achieving its desired goals, it should be tweaked so it will achieve those goals as inexpensively as possible. If goals have been met or the program is not capable of achieving its goals, it should be phased out. I would pre-fer that the state government establish

goals and allow the counties to work within their population to develop specific rules and a game plan for how to facilitate. 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is propos-ing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 session. What if any re-forms do you support? Our tax system is too compli-cated. We need to simplify the

tax code and reduce loopholes. The re-duction of loopholes should be focused on keeping money earned in Minnesota to stay in the state. 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state? There are many investors sitting on money here in our state. They are un-certain about the future. I feel strongly that if the Minnesota Legislature ad-opted the Minnesota Health Plan it would greatly reduce this uncertainty. Health care costs are rising at an ex-ponential rate. The Minnesota Health Plan would markedly reduce rates and provide 100 percent coverage for all Minnesotans that would be affordable, portable and not dependent on employ-ment. Businesses would have predict-able health care costs, a more produc-tive work force and reduced worker’s compensation insurance rates. If every-

one has insurance, that will significant-ly reduce litigation. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of edu-cation funding or policy reform you sup-port? I think our current funding formula is insufficient. It seems that the 2001 Funding Reform really did not go to education, but instead went primarily to property tax relief. Not that I am op-posed to property tax relief. I am op-posed to shell games and accounting gimmicks. I am in favor of honest leg-islation that gets money to the schools. I support local control of education monies. This must not be put off. Every year of delay will condemn more to a lifetime of increased risk of poverty, in-creased incarceration rates and a drain on our economy. 5) How should Minnesota address its unmet transportation needs in the fu-ture? Where do we want to be in 20-30 years? I still believe that any Metro-politan area that wants to be successful must have a state-of-the-art transpor-tation system. A system that not only gets its products rapidly and efficiently from one place to another, but also its workers and consumers. Anyone going from Savage/Burnsville to Minneapo-

lis or St. Paul between 6:30-8:30 a.m. can tell you this is not efficient. Gov-ernment can encourage and fund mass transit via a gas tax increase. Painful as this is, it would decrease congestion and 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? I too would have voted against the stadium funding. The NFL is a multi-million dollar industry that could have helped fund this stadium. Money could have been spent much more wisely on infrastructure needs. The funding mechanism is also suspect. 7) What are other issues of impor-tance to you and what can the Legisla-ture do to address them? We cannot solve our budget woes until we address the cost of health care and its inaccessibility for too many Minnesotans. Again I propose the Minnesota Health Plan that stud-ies have shown will decrease the cost of health care for the state of Minnesota and produce a savings of 9 percent. Currently, 32 percent of our budget is spent on health and human services (Coalition of MN Businesses) yet we still have far too many people without medical coverage. We currently have a hodgepodge system that is uncoor-dinated, leaving many people seeking their primary medical care at the local emergency room.

DaveJensen

See MYHRA, 11B

Re-elect

Mary SherryBurnsville City Council

Common Sense for the Common GoodPaid for by the Mary Sherry for Council Committee, 1504 Chateaulin Ln. Burnsville, MN 55337

B R U C E

J O H N S O N

BURNSVILLE CITY COUNCIL

November 6thPrepared & Paid for by Bruce Johnson for City Council Volunteers✔


House District 56BHouse District 56BRoz Peterson, Republican, House District 56B Age: 47 Address: 12295 162nd St. W., Lakeville Occupation: Cerron Commercial Properties, Realtor; small business owner and real estate investor Family: Husband Tim (25 years), two children Qualifications: 2009 Business Person of the Year, CAC Spirit of Caring Award, Ho-sanna! member, former Snyder Drug (Lakev-ille, Savage, Cannon Falls & Northfield) owner, ISD 194 Board of Education vice chair; strategic plan and magnet schools task force, Minnesota School Boards Association director, Dakota County Regional Chamber chair, Minnesota State High School League director; executive & eligibility commit-tee, Lakeville Chamber past president and foundation chair, Big Three Board director (Cities, Counties and Schools), Downtown Lakeville Business Association, Community Education Advisory Council, former Girl Scout leader and Hope for Tomorrow men-tor. Education: Gustavus Adolphus College, B.A. business management and psychology cum laude 1) An August report from the Minnesota Budget and Management Office say a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts? No, for the simple fact that our current revenues are increasing faster than what

Management and Budget forecasted back in February. According to their July economic update, the state’s reve-nue has increased $336 million above what was projected, led by greater revenue generated by our corporate taxes. This shows that when our econ-omy is working better, however slight it may be, our fiscal picture improves. By stimulating our economy and get-

ting people working again, our revenues will be sufficient. We must still, however, reign in the spending side of the equation. 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a dis-cussion on tax reform in the 2013 session. What if any reforms do you support? Our tax system is overly complicated and oppressive. Many Minnesotans, both indi-viduals and businesses, do not realize many of the deductions and credits they qualify for. We must reduce the confusion for aver-age Minnesotans and businesses who cannot afford high priced accountants to sort out their fiscal pictures. Many people file their taxes on their own, and we owe it to them to create a system that leaves the money in their hands and not first filtered through govern-ment’s hands. 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state? Government must create a better atmo-sphere for business. The nonpartisan Tax Foundation ranked Minnesota 45th in Busi-ness Tax Climate because businesses are over taxed in Minnesota. For example, in addi-tion to the local property taxes individuals pay, businesses must also pay a property tax

to the state. This is $800-plus million annu-ally in revenue that could be used toward ex-pansion, hiring new employees, or increased wages for current employees. Mind you, these are not just the big corporations that pay this, but also local small businesses. We must allow businesses to retain their revenue which stimulates job creation. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support? I support paying back the money that was borrowed our schools. We need to look at all the different funding formulas and address unfunded mandates that take money away from the general fund. A free public educa-tion for our children is in our state constitu-tion and critical to produce a highly educat-ed workforce. It is best to look at education systemically, from early childhood to post secondary. I support more flexibility and less bureaucracy at the local level to help drive in-novation and creative ways to adapt our edu-cational system for the 21st century student. 5) How should Minnesota address its un-met transportation needs in the future? Our main emphasis should be to move people and goods in the most efficient way possible. I-35 is a critical interstate freeway. The daily bottleneck at the river crossing needs solutions. Common sense environ-mental permitting and eliminating antiquat-ed laws will reduce the costs and shrink bureaucracies in MnDOT that enforce cur-rent requirements. MnDOT needs authority within existing funding to expedite conges-tion relief projects in the metropolitan area. Metropolitan transit governance reform is

needed, which includes more transit plan-ning involvement by local elected officials, who are accountable to the citizens, rather than unelected bureaucrats. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? We both want to improve our schools, help small businesses grow to improve our economy and strengthen the middle class. Taxes are too complicated and there are too many outdated laws. There are several unfunded mandates at the city, county and school level that make the current status quo unsustainable with the current funding. We both agree that constitutional amendments are a poor way to legislate. We don’t want gridlock at the state Legislature or see anoth-er state shut down. It is time for everyone to work together to solve our problems without sacrificing principles and stop playing party politics. 7) What are other issues of importance to you and what can the Legislature do to ad-dress them? My top priorities are growing private sec-tor jobs and the economy, providing qual-ity education to our children and healthcare that is affordable. We can foster job growth by keeping the tax burden low and streamlin-ing regulations. By allowing more flexibility at the local level, we can innovate and cre-ate new ways to deliver core government ser-vices. It is also important to keep freedom of choice for our people and protect them from an ever growing, over reaching government. I am prepared to be a servant leader as your representative and ask you to vote Roz Peter-son for State House 56B.

RozPeterson

crease in spending for the 2014/15 biennium, hence the $1 billion projected budget deficit for 2014/15. Whatever the MMB’s next fore-cast (due the end of November) projects, I am committed to living within our means and holding down taxes. 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a dis-cussion on tax reform in the 2013 session. What if any reforms do you support? Recently, the governor stated, “This un-willingness to pay taxes and seeing it as a threat to our freedom and liberty … is go-ing to be the death of this country if it’s not corrected.” In contrast, I believe tax reform should lessen the burden on individuals, families, and businesses, not increase it. The Tax Foundation ranks Minnesota as having one of the worst business tax climates in the U.S. I will prioritize the phase-out of state business property taxes because of their re-gressive nature, and will seek to eliminate the up-front assessment of sales tax on business capital equipment purchases.

3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job creation in the state? As I have been door-knocking my House district, many business owners have shared with me their frustration with the regulatory and reporting requirements in Minnesota. They have expressed their frustration with the slow permitting process and aggressive tax rules. Many are trying to just keep from closing their doors. The best way to spur job growth is to reduce government regulatory interference and the regressive tax burden on employers. My candidacy is endorsed by both the Minnesota Chamber Leadership Fund PAC and the National Federation of Independent Business-Minnesota SAFE Trust because of my pro-jobs work during my first-term in office. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education funding or policy reform you support? I believe the state’s first priority should

be paying back funds borrowed from the schools. Last spring I co-authored House File 2083 to pay back all the funds borrowed during the 2011/12 legislative session. The bill passed the Legislature and was presented to the governor. Unfortunately, the governor vetoed the bill. As in my first-term, I will continue to advocate for transparency, ac-countability, and efficiency in public educa-tion, while focusing on literacy, grading of schools, effective evaluation of both teachers and programs, and advancements in digital learning. 5) How should Minnesota address its un-met transportation needs in the future? I believe our limited transportation dol-lars should be spent on roads and bridges where individuals and businesses have the greatest level of flexibility to meet their transportation needs. Concerning public transportation, I support methods that can adapt to our mobile and ever-relocating pop-ulation. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on?

At the recent Burnsville Chamber of Commerce forum, which is being re-broad-cast on cable Channel 16, my opponent agreed with me that it is important to main-tain Minnesota’s roads and bridges. 7) What are other issues of importance to you and what can the Legislature do to ad-dress them? I believe in reducing the size and reach of government, unleashing the potential of our economy by reducing burdensome regulation and taxes on business, protecting innocent human life, and our freedom of speech, reli-gion, and right to keep and bear arms. I have been endorsed by the Minnesota Chamber Leadership Fund PAC, the National Fed-eration of Independent Business-Minnesota SAFE Trust, the Minnesota Citizens Con-cerned for Life State PAC, and the National Rifle Association (NRA) – Political Victory Fund. I have also received the National Fed-eration of Independent Business - Guardian of Small Business Award.

MYHRA, from 10B


Will Morgan, DFL, House District 56B Age: 45 Address: 409 Oakland Lane, Burnsville Occupation: Physics and chemis-try teacher, Burnsville High School Family: Wife, Denise; three boys: Jack (6), Sam (5), Charlie, (2) Qualifications: B.A., physics, Carleton College, Northfield; M.A., education, St. Mary’s University of Minnesota, Winona; 22 years teaching experience, Burnsville High School. Board member of CDLC, Prince of Peace Church, Burnsville. Mem-ber, Grace Lutheran Church, Apple Valley. Former state legislator: elected 2006, re-elected 2008. 1) An August report from the Minne-sota Budget and Management Office say a $1.1 billion general fund deficit is projected for the 2014-15 biennium. Should the entire amount be closed with spending cuts? We must not forget this doesn’t include the cost of paying back the $2.4 billion the current Legislature borrowed from schools. That increases the projected deficit to $3.5 billion. We should look first to seek savings through greater efficiencies, cutting waste-ful spending and ending programs that no longer serve their purpose. Then we must look at every line of the budget, prioritize what must be done and make sure our

choices minimize harm to individu-als, families and our fragile econom-ic recovery. My preference would be a bi-partisan solution that ends the perpetual cycle of borrowing and budget shortfalls. 2) Gov. Mark Dayton is proposing a discussion on tax reform in the 2013 session. What if any reforms do you support?

We should look at property taxes, fiscal disparities and restoring the renter’s rebate. Governor Pawlenty put together a com-mission of stakeholders from the business community, elected officials, labor groups and economic think tanks several years ago. I’m sure any serious look at tax reform will consider their recommendations. Any changes should help to make our tax sys-tem fit better in the 21st century economy without damaging our fragile economic re-covery. 3) The Minnesota unemployment rate was at 5.9 percent as of August 2012. What can the Legislature do to improve job cre-ation in the state? We have to listen to small business own-ers who will be the drivers of a more ro-bust recovery. I’m hearing they need relief from government red tape and unnecessary, outdated regulations. Changes to our tax code should be sure to keep the competitive needs of Minnesota businesses in mind. Those changes should help in the short

term. Medium and long-term steps would include investments in transportation and high-speed internet infrastructure as well as maintaining an excellent education system to prepare a top-notch workforce to com-pete globally in our 21st century economy. 4) Would you support an increase to the state’s per-pupil funding formula? Why or why not? Are there areas of education fund-ing or policy reform you support? Local school districts are struggling with class sizes and have been forced to make horrible choices to reduce budgets (e.g., increasing class sizes, closing schools and considering four-day school weeks). A funding increase will be part of efforts to improve our local schools. We must always be working to improve how we deliver edu-cation on the policy side as well. The sta-tus quo is never good enough for our kids. Improved teacher training and giving local districts more flexibility to provide men-torship and professional collaboration be-tween experienced and new teachers would be a good start. 5) How should Minnesota address its un-met transportation needs in the future? Congestion relief improves quality of life and reduces the cost of commerce. We regularly use bonding to improve roads and transit, and have given county commission-ers the authority to impose additional sales taxes to pay for regional improvements. In-vestments in transportation infrastructure

and expanding transit options have helped reduce congestion along the two major cor-ridors serving the south metro. We must continue to seek partnerships with all levels of government and listen to the needs of individuals and businesses to continue to improve our system as the metro area con-tinues to grow over the next 20-30 years. 6) What issue or issues might you agree with your opponent on? I am certain my opponent and I agree on the importance of small businesses in growing our economy. I am just as certain we agree on the need to reduce red tape and unnecessary regulations on businesses in order to make our recovery robust and pro-vide greater prosperity for all. 7) What are other issues of importance to you and what can the Legislature do to ad-dress them? Four years ago Minnesota voters ap-proved the Legacy Amendment to support clean water, the arts, parks and trails and protect our outdoor heritage. Even though the constitutional language approved by the voters was fairly clear, there have been attempts by some legislators to divert those new funds for other purposes. Voters did not create a slush fund for anybody’s pet projects! If elected, I will work to make sure those funds remain dedicated to the purpose approved by the voters. We must protect our legacy!

WillMorgan

★ Will work hard and represent alltaxpayers fairly

★ He will meet with ourtaxpayers & listen

★ Believes everyone’svoice is important

★ Will work towardinnovative and newideas that will helplocal governmentwork together andkeep costs down

★ Will work together asone to make ourcommunities better forthe next generations

Let’s keep DAKOTA COUNTY as a GREAT PLACE to LIVE, WORK & PLAY!

Dave Giles hasa common

senseapproach!

Prepared and paid for by Dave Giles for County Commissioner, 2110 Alcana Lane, Burnsville 612-685-5863

About Dave Giles:★ Lifelong resident of Burnsville and Dakota County★ Married to Shari for 32 years and has 4 children★ Lifelong member of St. John the Baptist Catholic

Church & 36 years with the Knights of Columbus★ 30 years experience working at the municipal &

county levels★ Small business

owner for over30 years

★ Professionalfirefighter andparamedic forthe BurnsvilleFire Departmentfor over 20 years

STATE REPRESENTATIVE

ELECT

ROZP E T E R S O N

Vote Roz Peterson November 6thwww.rozpeterson.com

Paid and prepared for by “Elect Roz Peterson” Committee 12295 162nd St. W., Lakeville, MN 55044 952-892-1782

Documents

Burnsville, Eagan, Minnesota 2012 Voters Guide