Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Briefing of MnGeo Digital Cadastral Data Committee
Briefing of MnGeo Digital Cadastral Data Committee
December 3, 2010December 3, 2010
Randall Johnson, MetroGIS Staff Coordinator
and QPV Study Administrative Coordinator
Randall Johnson, MetroGIS Staff Coordinator
and QPV Study Administrative Coordinator
Measuring Public Value Creation of Measuring Public Value Creation of
Geospatial Commons Geospatial Commons ((QPV StudyQPV Study))
Measuring Public Value Creation of Measuring Public Value Creation of Geospatial Commons Geospatial Commons
((QPV StudyQPV Study))
Today’s TopicsToday’s TopicsToday’s TopicsToday’s Topics Quantifying Public Value (QPV) StudyQuantifying Public Value (QPV) Study Quantifying Public Value (QPV) StudyQuantifying Public Value (QPV) Study
• Objective, Value, and ImportanceObjective, Value, and Importance
• Sponsors and RolesSponsors and Roles
• Support TeamSupport Team
• Scope and Major Components Scope and Major Components
• Progress UpdateProgress Update
ObjectiveObjective
““Develop a trusted methodology capable of Develop a trusted methodology capable of quantitatively measuring public value created quantitatively measuring public value created
when organizations actively participate in when organizations actively participate in geospatial commons” geospatial commons”
ClarificationClarification: This is a research project, involving broad goals : This is a research project, involving broad goals with County, MetroGIS stakeholders, and U.S. NSDI activities, with County, MetroGIS stakeholders, and U.S. NSDI activities,
relevancy to Hennepin relevancy to Hennepin withwith the sole outcome of assessing the sole outcome of assessing ROI approaches for SDIs and developing a prototype methodROI approaches for SDIs and developing a prototype method
Value - Hennepin County Value - Hennepin County CommunityCommunity
““
• Discover opportunities for Hennepin County to improve its Discover opportunities for Hennepin County to improve its internal ROI internal ROI
• Discover strengths and weaknesses of the GITA-ROI approach Discover strengths and weaknesses of the GITA-ROI approach ((using Hennepin County as a testbed)using Hennepin County as a testbed)
• Better understand potential costs and benefits of cross-Better understand potential costs and benefits of cross- sector sector collaboration collaboration
• Establish a means to quantify public value (…Establish a means to quantify public value (…use of geospatial use of geospatial technology for parcelstechnology for parcels))
• Provide policy makers with a tool to readily compare ROI Provide policy makers with a tool to readily compare ROI analysis against to their respective operationsanalysis against to their respective operations
Value anticipated to be realized by stakeholders Value anticipated to be realized by stakeholders from this Quantify Public Value (QPV) study: from this Quantify Public Value (QPV) study:
Importance - Metro Area Importance - Metro Area and Beyond and Beyond
““quantify value created through collaborative solutions to quantify value created through collaborative solutions to shared geospatial needs in a manner that policy makers can shared geospatial needs in a manner that policy makers can
readily compare against to their respective operationsreadily compare against to their respective operations” ”
The vision of a US National Spatial Data The vision of a US National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI) dates back to 1994….Infrastructure (NSDI) dates back to 1994….
BUTBUT progress to realize this vision has been limited, in progress to realize this vision has been limited, in large part, because a trusted means is lacking to: large part, because a trusted means is lacking to:
……An Outcome Sought via this Study…An Outcome Sought via this Study…
Study Sponsors and RolesStudy Sponsors and Roles
• 1000 Friends of Minnesota 1000 Friends of Minnesota ––Contacts for InterviewsContacts for Interviews
• Hennepin County Hennepin County – – Subject of ROI StudySubject of ROI Study
• MetroGISMetroGIS – – Project ManagementProject Management
• Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Council – – Manage Grant FundsManage Grant Funds
• Federal Geographic Data Committee - Federal Geographic Data Committee - FundingFunding
Support TeamSupport Team
Francis Harvey, Research Coordinator Francis Harvey, Research Coordinator
Randall Johnson, Administrative Coordinator Randall Johnson, Administrative Coordinator
Gary Swenson, Hennepin County Contact Gary Swenson, Hennepin County Contact
Danielle Scarfe and Molly Managan with W4Sight, LCC , Danielle Scarfe and Molly Managan with W4Sight, LCC , Lead support for Tasks 1 and 3Lead support for Tasks 1 and 3
Scientific Advisors Scientific Advisors – 10-12 experts on Spatial Data – 10-12 experts on Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI) from U.S. and abroadInfrastructure (SDI) from U.S. and abroad
General Advisors General Advisors – 10-12 Individuals with expertise and – 10-12 Individuals with expertise and organizational affiliations important to the success of organizational affiliations important to the success of the studythe study
ScopeScope
The study scope is limited, recognizing the The study scope is limited, recognizing the proof of concept/prototyping nature, to:proof of concept/prototyping nature, to:
Major Components: Major Components: Internal and Community Focuses Internal and Community Focuses
• The data producer’s operations (Hennepin County)The data producer’s operations (Hennepin County)
• Operations of organizations that serve the area Operations of organizations that serve the area comprising Hennepin County (comprising Hennepin County (taxpayer’s value taxpayer’s value perspectiveperspective) )
Measure public value creation potential Measure public value creation potential through of use of geospatial technology to through of use of geospatial technology to
produce and use parcel data…produce and use parcel data…
For support of:For support of:
Design and Timing Design and Timing
1. Jun to Aug. 20101. Jun to Aug. 2010: Conduct GITA ROI Analysis for : Conduct GITA ROI Analysis for Hennepin County internal operations Hennepin County internal operations
2. Sept. to Dec2. Sept. to Dec..: Define Extended ROI Methodology – : Define Extended ROI Methodology – Those enhancements to the base ROI needed to Those enhancements to the base ROI needed to account for a geospatial commons environment account for a geospatial commons environment [aka - Quantify Public Value (QPV) Methodology V1] [aka - Quantify Public Value (QPV) Methodology V1]
3. Jan. to Mar. 20113. Jan. to Mar. 2011: Apply QPV V1 Methodology to a : Apply QPV V1 Methodology to a range of non-public and public entities that serve the range of non-public and public entities that serve the geographic extent of Hennepin County geographic extent of Hennepin County
4. Apr4. Apr..: Refine QPV Methodology for application : Refine QPV Methodology for application elsewhere [aka - QPV Methodology V2] elsewhere [aka - QPV Methodology V2]
5. May-Jun5. May-Jun..: Draft Final Project Report: Draft Final Project Report
This study involves the following major tasks: This study involves the following major tasks:
Interviewees –Task 1 Interviewees –Task 1 Representatives of all Hennepin County Representatives of all Hennepin County
operations that operations that produceproduce and/or and/or useuse parcel data parcel data. .
Ten individuals, representing the following county Ten individuals, representing the following county departments participateddepartments participated::
Interviewees – Task 3Interviewees – Task 3Representatives of a variety of non-profit, for-Representatives of a variety of non-profit, for-
profit, utility, and government interests:profit, utility, and government interests:
1) Whose operations do/could benefit from access to parcel 1) Whose operations do/could benefit from access to parcel data produced by Hennepin County data produced by Hennepin County
AND AND
2)2) Who believe their value added data/web service/ Who believe their value added data/web service/ applications do/could improve the cost - effectiveness of:applications do/could improve the cost - effectiveness of:
a)a) Hennepin County operations Hennepin County operations
AND/OR AND/OR
b)b) Operations of one or more taxing jurisdictions that serve Operations of one or more taxing jurisdictions that serve Hennepin County’s citizens. Hennepin County’s citizens.
Funding SourceFunding Source
A $50,000 NSDI CAP Grant was awarded in April A $50,000 NSDI CAP Grant was awarded in April 2010 for this study. These funds support2010 for this study. These funds support: :
• Training on GITA’s ROI methodology. Training on GITA’s ROI methodology.
• W4Sight, LLC to conduct interviews and W4Sight, LLC to conduct interviews and report report findings in a series of ROI worksheets.findings in a series of ROI worksheets.
• Stipends to recognized experts on Spatial Data Stipends to recognized experts on Spatial Data Infrastructures (SDI) to advise the study.Infrastructures (SDI) to advise the study.
• Forums and webinars to obtain input from SDI Forums and webinars to obtain input from SDI and ROI experts across the country and abroad.and ROI experts across the country and abroad.
StatusStatus
• First round of interviews with Hennepin County First round of interviews with Hennepin County staff completed July 19-21. staff completed July 19-21.
• Recognized that Recognized that datadata needed to complete the ROI needed to complete the ROI worksheets developed by GITA worksheets developed by GITA not availablenot available..
• Sought and received permission from FGDC to Sought and received permission from FGDC to continue study using home-grown method.continue study using home-grown method.
Task 1Task 1: :
Task 2:Task 2:
• The international scientific advisory team met The international scientific advisory team met 12/1 via Web to craft QPV methodology.12/1 via Web to craft QPV methodology.
• Local advisory team to meet on 12/15 to refine Local advisory team to meet on 12/15 to refine the proposed QPV methodology.the proposed QPV methodology.
StatusStatus
Task 3:Task 3:• Interviews tentatively planned for late January Interviews tentatively planned for late January
• Interview individuals representing wide variety of Interview individuals representing wide variety of organizations that can/are creating public value organizations that can/are creating public value
as a result of access to parcel data produced by as a result of access to parcel data produced by Hennepin Hennepin County.County.
• April to June & July to September 2010April to June & July to September 2010 quarterly quarterly project reportsproject reports
• Available on project website at Available on project website at http://sdiqpv.net/sdiqpv/Project_Updates http://sdiqpv.net/sdiqpv/Project_Updates Project_Updates.html Project_Updates.html
Project Reports Submitted to FGDC:Project Reports Submitted to FGDC:
Questions /Information Questions /Information
Project websiteProject website: : http://sdiqpv.net/sdiqpv/Welcome.htmlhttp://sdiqpv.net/sdiqpv/Welcome.html
Francis Harvey Francis Harvey ([email protected]) ([email protected]) Study Research Coordinator Study Research Coordinator
Randall Johnson Randall Johnson ([email protected] )([email protected] )Study Administrative Coordinator Study Administrative Coordinator
Gary Swenson Gary Swenson ([email protected]) ([email protected]) Hennepin County Hennepin County
“…“…institutionalized, networked geographic institutionalized, networked geographic
information systems…information systems…”**”**
“…“…institutionalized, networked geographic institutionalized, networked geographic
information systems…information systems…”**”**
What is an SDI? What is an SDI? (Spatial Data Infrastructure)(Spatial Data Infrastructure)
What is an SDI? What is an SDI? (Spatial Data Infrastructure)(Spatial Data Infrastructure)
****January 2009January 2009 interview with Professor Francis Harvey, University of MNinterview with Professor Francis Harvey, University of MN
What is an SDI? What is an SDI? (Spatial Data Infrastructure)(Spatial Data Infrastructure)
What is an SDI? What is an SDI? (Spatial Data Infrastructure)(Spatial Data Infrastructure)
Climate
Public Safety
Community Development
Human Services
Natural Resources
Transportation
Telecommunications
Education
Public Works
1. Framework Data-Web Services-Apps.
2. Meeting Cross-Sector Business
Information Needs
1. Framework Data-Web Services-Apps.
2. Meeting Cross-Sector Business
Information Needs
Other
Finance / Real Estate
