BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Assessment Report

Building Details 19022022 Section 1 ‐ Page 1

BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Assessment Report

General information

BRE Assessment reference no BREEAM‐0058‐2544Client name Omega Warrington

Building end useroccupier Plastic OmniumAssessor name Matthew DalleyAssessors role BREEAM Assessor

Assessor organisation Hannan Associates

Building details

Building name Plastic Omnium BuildingBuilding address Omega Warrington South

Warrington

County CheshirePost code WA54AH

Country EnglandBuilding type (main description) Industrial

Building type (sub‐group) Industrial ‐ Warehouse storage distributionBuilding floor area (GIA) m2 23223

Building floor area (NIFA) m2 17417BREEAM scheme New ConstructionBREEAM version 2014 (SD5076)

BREEAM UK 2014 technical manual issue number SD5076 Issue 20Project type New Construction (Fully fitted)

Assessment stage Post Construction (Final as‐built)Location type Smallmedium urban (gt10000 population)

Building services ‐ heating system type Air systemBuilding services ‐ cooling system type Air‐conditioning

Building services ‐ domestic hot water system type Centralised supply and distributionBuilding service ‐ controls Standard controls (timetemperature)

If applicable does this industrial building have a heated or cooled operational area YesDoes water heating contribute less than 10 of the buildings total energy consumption Yes

Commercialindustrial refrigeration and storage systems NoBuilding user transportation systems (lifts andor escalators) Yes

Laboratory functionarea and size category No laboratoryLaboratory containment level No laboratory

Fume cupboard(s) andor other containment devices NoUnregulated water uses present (eg vehicle wash system irrigation) Yes

If applicable will this healthcare building house inpatients Option not applicable to building typeIf applicable does this industrial building have an office area Yes

If applicable does this building contain areas requiring SAP assessment Option not applicable to building typeIf SAP used what proportion of the buildings total floor area (GIA) does it apply to Option not applicable to building type

Project team details

Developer Omega Warrington Ltd (OWL)Principal contractor Bowmer and Kirkland Limited

Architect Chetwoods LimitedProject management Doig and Smith Ltd

Building services Derry Building ServicesBREEAM Accredited Professional

Other project team member 1Other project team member 2Other project team member 3Other project team member 4

BREEAM assessor declaration of assessment accuracy and quality

I Matthew Dalley a qualified BREEAM assessor working on behalf of Hannan Associates confirm that the content of this report is to the best of my knowledge a true and accuratereflection of the performance of the above named building as measured against the assessment criteria and reporting requirements of the BREEAM Scheme Document (SD5076)Furthermore I confirm that this assessment and the information on which it is based has been checked and verified in accordance with BRE Global Ltds UKAS accredited BREEAMoperating procedures for BREEAM assessments and assessors as described in the technical scheme document (SD5076) and associated BREEAM operational documents

BREEAM Assessor Signature Matthew Dalley | MSc BSc (Hons) |Senior Sustainability Consultant |Hannan Associates

Date 25082015

DisclaimerThis report is made on behalf of Hannan Associates By receiving the report and acting on it the client ‐ or any third party relying on it ‐ accepts that no individual is personally liable incontract tort or breach of statutory duty (including negligence)

DisclaimerConflict of Interest ‐ Where an assessor is employed by the same company as a projectdesign team member(s) (eg energy assessor suitably qualified ecologist or clientrepresentative etc) they must identify and manage any potential conflicts of interest and inform BRE Global Ltd as soon as they become aware of such a conflict Where possible thisshould be made clear to BREEAM upon registration of the assessmentBRE Global do prohibit an assessor from verifying compliance with scheme criteria where they themselves have been directly involved in achieving or implementing a compliantsolution ie an assessor cannot assess their own work for example they cannot be the architect on a project and the assessor A current exception to this rule is where the assessor isalso acting as an accredited Sustainability Champion or BREEAM Accredited Professional on the project

Where there is a conflict of interest or potential for one BRE Global Ltd will escalate the assessment report to a more detailed level of quality assurance checking This will be done toreduce the risk to assessors and clients in the event that a certification outcome is challenged Additional levels of monitoring may result in additional charges (FS036) being made tothe licensed organisation that employs the assessor

CopyrightCopyright exists on the BREEAM logo and this may not be used or reproduced for any purpose without the prior written consent of the BRE Global LtdThe BREEAM name and logo are registered trademarks of the Building Research Establishment Limited

Assessment Rating KPIs 19022022 Section 2 ‐ Page 2

BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Assessment Report Rating amp Key Performance Indicators

Overall Building Performance

Building name Plastic Omnium Building

BREEAM rating Very Good

Total Score 5507

Min standards level achieved Excellent level

Building Performance by Environment Section

Environmental SectionNo creditsavailable

No creditsAchieved

creditsachieved

SectionWeighting Section Score

Management 21 14 6667 1200 800

Health amp Wellbeing 17 8 4706 1500 706

Energy 23 11 4783 1500 717

Transport 9 3 3333 900 300

Water 9 7 7778 700 544

Materials 10 5 5000 1350 675

Waste 8 5 6250 850 531

Land Use amp Ecology 10 7 7000 1000 700

Pollution 12 4 3333 1000 333

Innovation 10 2 2000 NA 2

Management Health ampWellbeing

Energy Transport Water Materials Waste Land Use ampEcology

Pollution Innovation

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Section score available Section score achieved


Building Performance by Key Environmental Performance Indicator

Energy (consumptionproduction) Life cycle stage Measurement Intensity Units Total Units

Building operation[1] Use Modelled 9552 kWhm2yr 2218261 kWhyr

Energy production[2] Use Modelled 000 kWhm2yr 0 kWhyr

Construction process[3] Construction Measured INA kWhpound100k INA kWh

Transport[4] Construction Measured INA Litreskm VALUE Litres of fuel

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Building operation[1] Use Modelled 1640 kgCO2eqm2yr 380857 kgCO2eqyr

Embodied[5] Cradle‐to‐grave Measured 3945 kgCO2eqm2 916136 kgCO2eq

Proportion of applicable main building elements that data reported covers 10000

Construction process[3] Construction Measured INA KgCO2eq pound100k INA KgCO2eq

Transport[4] Construction Measured INA KgCO2eq km VALUE KgCO2eq

Direct GHG emissions ‐ Refrigerants[6] Use Modelled INA KgCO2eqkWcoolth INA KgCO2eq

Emissions to outdoor air soil and water

Nitrogen Oxides (NOx)[7] Use Measured 000 mgkWh INA kgyr

Use of freshwater resource

Building operation[8] Use Modelled 1975 m3personyr 39371 m3yr

Construction process[9] Use Measured INA m3pound100k INA m3

Construction waste and recovery

Construction waste[10] Construction Measured 160 m3100m2 372 m3

Construction waste diverted from landfill[10] Construction Measured 7000 260 m3

Demolition waste diverted from landfill[11] ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Demolition waste to disposal[11] ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐

Material for re‐use[12] Construction Measured INA m3100m2 INA m3

Material for recycling[12] Construction Measured INA m3100m2 INA m3

Material for energy recovery[12] Construction Measured INA m3100m2 INA m3

Hazardous waste to disposal[12] Construction Measured INA m3100m2 INA m3

Sourcing of materials

Materials responsibly sourced[13] Construction Measured 000 ‐ ‐

Thermal comfort

Predicted Mean Vote (PMV) Use Modelled ‐05 Index ‐ ‐

Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) Use Modelled 90 ‐ ‐

Indoor Air Quality

Formaldehyde concentration level[14] Use Measured INA microgm3 INA INA

Total volatile organic compound concentration[14] Construction Measured INA microgm3 INA INA

Notes1 Modelled using approved software compliant with the UKs National Calculation Method which in turn is compliant with Article 3 of The Energy Performance of Buildings Directive (EPBD) 200291EC Modelling

includes building energy consumption resulting from the specification of a lsquocontrolledrsquo lsquofixed building servicersquo (as defined in the relevant Approved Document or Guidance produced for each UK territory)

2 The reported impact includes technologies that produce energy (on‐site andor near‐site) as defined by Directive 200928EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 April 2009 on the promotion of theuse of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 200177EC and 200330EC

3 The reported impact includes energy consumption from construction plant equipment and site accommodation This KPI is not assessedreported at the design stage of assessmentcertification

4 The reported impact covers transport of the construction materials that make‐up the main building elements and ground works and landscaping materials (from the factory gate to the site) and construction waste(from the construction gate to waste disposal processing recovery centre gate) Main building elements are defined in the BREEAM 2014 New Construction Technical Guide (SD5076) This KPI is notassessedreported at the design stage of assessmentcertification

5 The reported impact covers the construction materials that make‐up the main building elements (over a 60 year study period) Main building elements are defined in the BREEAM UK New Construction2014 TechnicalGuide (SD5076) The data is quantified using BREs Environmental Profiles Methodology The Environmental Profiles Methodology has been peer reviewed to comply with BS ISO 14040 and represents the ProductCategory Rules for BRE Globalrsquos environmental labelling scheme (EPD ‐ ISO 14025 Type III) for construction products and elements

6 The reported impact is for a 10 year study period The calculation of the Direct Effect Life Cycle CO2eq emissions used by BREEAM is based on the Total Equivalent Warming Impact (TEWI) calculation method for newstationary refrigeration and air conditioning systems as described in Annex B of BS EN 378‐12008

7 The reported impact covers emissions from either one or a combination of space heating cooling and hot water heating (refer to Pol02 Assessment Issue for scope of emissions)

8 The reported impact includes net water consumption from the micro‐components utilised by building occupants for sanitary purposes The impact accounts for water recyclingrainwater collection where used forpermissible non‐potable water demands (For further detail refer to BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Technical Guide (SD5076))

9 The reported impact is net water consumption ie accounts for any water recyclingrainwater collection used to off‐set a potable site demand This KPI is not assessedreported at the design stage ofassessmentcertification

10 The reported impact covers non‐hazardous waste from new construction materials it therefore excludes hazardous and demolition and excavation waste Where assessed and reported at the design stage ofassessment this KPI is based on a target as reported in a compliant Resource Management Plan

11 The reported impact covers non‐hazardous waste from site demolition Where assessed and reported at the design stage at the design stage of assessment this KPI is based on the target demolition waste divertedfrom landfill as reported in a compliant Site Waste Management Plan If no demolition taking place on site this KPI is not applicable

12 Where assessed and reported at the design stage of assessment this KPI is based on a target as reported in a compliant Site Waste Management Plan

13 The reported impact covers the proportion of the key building elements present and assessed by BREEAM that are responsibly sourced Responsibly sourced and key building elements are defined in the BREEAM UKNew Construction 2014 Technical Guide (SD5076)

14 The total volatile organic compound (TVOC) concentration is measured post construction (but pre‐occupancy) over 8 hours Formaldehyde concentration level is measured post construction (but pre‐occupancy)averaged over 30 minutes Both KPIs are measured in accordance with European andor ISO standards (refer to the BREEAM New Construction Technical Manual for relevant standard numbers) At the design stageof assessment no data is available for this KPI as they are both measured once the building has been constructed (but pre‐occupancy) for the purpose of post construction assessment


INA = Indicator Not Assessed This will be the case where either the data required for the KPI is not gatheredmeasured by the buildings project team or not assessedquantified in BREEAM for a particular buildingtype or assessment stage eg energy consumption for construction process at the design stage of assessment‐ = KPI not applicable to building being assessed

Building Performance by Assessment Issue 19022022 Section 3 ‐ Page 5

BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Assessment Report Assessment Issue Scoring

Building name Plastic Omnium BuildingBuilding score () 5507

Building rating Very GoodMinimum standards level achieved Excellent level

MANAGEMENT

Man 01 Project brief and design

No of BREEAM credits available 4 Available contribution to overall score 229

No of BREEAM innovation credits available 0 Minimum standards applicable No

Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedStakeholder consultation (project delivery) No 1 0

Stakeholder consultation (third party) Yes 1 1Sustainabilty champion (design) No 1 0

Sustainabilty champion (monitoring progress) No 1 0

Total BREEAM credits achieved 1Total contribution to overall building score 057Total BREEAM innovation credits achieved 0

Minimum standard(s) level NA

Assessor commentsnotesMan 01 stakeholder consultation not fully validated due to lack of evidnce

Man 02 Life cycle cost and service life planning

No of BREEAM credits available 4 Available contribution to overall score 229No of BREEAM innovation credits available 0 Minimum standards applicable No


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedElemental life cycle cost (LCC) No 2 0

Component level LCC plan No 1 0Capital cost reporting Yes 1 1

Capital cost of the project pound648 poundm2



Assessor commentsnotes


Man 03 Responsible construction practices

No of BREEAM credits available 6 Available contribution to overall score 343No of BREEAM innovation credits available 1 Minimum standards applicable Yes

Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedIs all site timber used in the project legally harvested and traded timber Yes

Environmental Management Yes 1 1Construction stage sustainability champion No 1 0

Considerate construction 2 2 2Monitoring of construction site impact (criterion 8) Yes

Utility consumption (water and energy) Yes 1 1Transport of construction materials and waste Yes 1 1

Exemplary level criteria ‐ considerate construction No 1 0

Key Performance Indicators Construction site energy useEnergy consumption (total) ‐ site processes INA kWh

Energy consumption (intensity) ‐ site processes INA kWhpound100kDistance (total) ‐ materials transport to site INA km

Distance (total) ‐waste transport from site INA kmEnergy consumption (total) ‐ materials transport to site INA Litres of fuelEnergy consumption (total) ‐ waste transport from site INA Litres of fuel

Energy consumption (intensity) ‐ materials transport to site LitreskmEnergy consumption (intensity) ‐ waste transport from site Litreskm

Key Performance Indicators Construction site greenhouse gas emissionsProcess greenhouse gas emissions (total) ‐ site processes INA KgCO2eq

Greenhouse gas emissions (intensity) ‐ site processes INA KgCO2eq pound100kGreenhouse gas emissions (total) ‐ materials transport to site INA KgCO2eqGreenhouse gas emissions (total) ‐ waste transport from site INA KgCO2eq

Greenhouse gas emissions (intensity) ‐ materials transport to site KgCO2eq kmGreenhouse gas emissions (intensity) ‐ waste transport from site KgCO2eq km

Key Performance Indicators Construction site use of freshwater resourcesUse of freshwater resource (total) ‐ site processes INA m3

Use of freshwater resource (intensity) ‐ site processes INA m3pound100k


Minimum standard(s) level Outstanding level




Man 04 Commisioning and handover


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedCommissioning schedule and responsibilities Yes 1 1

Commissioning building services Yes 1 1Commissioning building fabric Yes 1 1

Handover Yes 1 1Has a Building User Guide been developed prior to handover Yes

Total BREEAM credits achieved 4Total contribution to overall building score 229Total BREEAM innovation credits achieved NA



Man 05 Aftercare


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedAftercare support Yes 1 1

Seasonal commissioning Yes 1 1Post occupancy evaluation Yes 1 1

Exemplary level criteria Yes 1 1

Total BREEAM credits achieved 3Total contribution to overall building score 171


Total BREEAM innovation credits achieved 1Minimum standard(s) level Outstanding level



HEALTH amp WELLBEING

Hea 01 Visual Comfort


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedGlare control No 1 0

Daylighting (building type dependant) 0 1 0View out No 1 0

Internal and external lighting levels zoning and controls Yes 1 1Exemplary level daylighting No 1 0




Hea 02 Indoor Air Quality


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedMin sources of air pollution indoor air quality plan Yes 1 1

Ventilation No 1 0VOCs (products) Yes 1 1

VOCs (post‐construction) Yes 1 1Adaptability ‐ potential for natural ventilation No 1 0

Exemplary level VOCs (products) 0 2 0


Key Performance Indicators Indoor air qualityConcentration levels of formaldehyde INA microgm3

Total volatile organic compound (TVOC) concentration INA microgm3





Hea 03 Safe containment in laboratories Assessment issue not applicable

No of BREEAM credits available NA Available contribution to overall score NANo of BREEAM innovation credits available NA Minimum standards applicable NA

Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedObjective risk assessment of laboratory facilities Yes

Laboratory containment devices and containment areas Yes 0 0Containment level 2 and 3 labs Yes 0 0

Total BREEAM credits achieved NATotal contribution to overall building score NATotal BREEAM innovation credits achieved NA



Hea 04 Thermal comfort


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedThermal modelling Yes 1 1

Adaptability ‐ for a projected climate change scenario No 1 0Thermal zoning and control Yes 1 1

Key Performance Indicators Thermal comfortPredicted Mean Vote (PMV) ‐05

Predicted Percentage Dissatisfied (PPD) 90



Total BREEAM innovation credits achieved NAMinimum standard(s) level NA



Hea 05 Acoustic Performance


Assessment Criteria Credits Credits available Credits achievedAcoustic performance standards and testing requirements 2 3 2




Hea 06 Safety and Security


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedSafe external access No 1 0

Security of site and building No 1 0





Evidnce not provided to fully validate credits at Design Stage


ENERGY

Ene 01 Reduction of energy use and carbon emissions


Ene 01 Calculator

Country of the UK where the building is located EnglandConfirm building regulation and

version usedEngland Part L2A 2013

New Construction (Fully fitted)Building floor area 23223 m2

Improvement FactorNotional building heating and cooling energy demand 5681 MJm2 yr

Actual building heating and cooling energy demand 7996 MJm2 yrNotional building primary energy consumption 11462 kWhm2 yr

Actual building primary energy consumption 9552 kWhm2 yrTarget emission rate (TER) 1980 kgCO2m2 yr

Building emission rate (BER) 1640 kgCO2m2 yrBuilding emission rate improvement over TER 172 00

Heating amp cooling demand energy performance ratio (EPRDEM) 0000 0000Primary consumption energy performance ratio (EPRPC) 0265 0369

CO2 Energy performance ratio (EPRCO2) 0203 0037Overall building energy performance ratio (EPRNC) 0468 0406

Number of BREEAM credits achieved 6 5

Where specified please confirm the energy production from onsite or near site energy generation technologies 0Equivalent of the buildings lsquoregulatedrsquo energy consumption generated by carbon neutral sources and used to meet energy demand from

lsquounregulatedrsquo building systems or processesIs the building designed to be carbon negative

If the building is defined as carbon negative what is the total (modelled) renewablecarbon neutral energy generated and exported


Minimum standard(s) level Excellent level




Ene 02 Energy monitoring


Assessment criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedSub‐metering of major energy consuming systems Yes 1 1

Sub‐metering of high energy load and tenancy areas No 1 0




Ene 03 External lighting


Assessment criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedExternal lighting specification Yes 1 1






Ene 04 Low carbon design


Assessment criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achieved

Passive design analysis No 1 0

Free cooling No 1 0Low and zero carbon technologies No 1 0

KPI ‐ Low andor zero carbon energy generationTotal on‐site andor near‐site LZC energy generation 0 kWhyr




Ene 05 Energy efficient cold storage Assessment issue not applicable


Assessment criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedRefrigeration energy consumption No NA NAIndirect greenhouse gas emissions No NA NA






Ene 06 Energy efficient transportation systems

No of BREEAM credits available 3 Available contribution to overall score 196No of BREEAM innovation credits available 0 Minimum standards applicable NA

Assessment criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedEnergy consumption Yes 1 1

Energy efficient features Yes 2 2




Ene 07 Energy efficient laboratory systems Assessment issue not applicable


Assessment criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedPre‐requisite Criterion 1 of Hea 03 ‐ risk assessment of laboratory facilities Yes

Design specification No 0 0

Best Practice Energy Practices in Laboratories (table 27) Yes 0 NAItem b) Fan power

Item c) Fume cupboard volume flow ratesItem d) Grouping isolation of high filtrationventilation activities

Item e) Energy recovery ‐ heat Item f) Energy recovery ‐ cooling

Item g) Grouping of cooling loads Item h) Free cooling

Item i) Load responsiveness


Item j) CleanroomsItem k) Diversity

Item l) Room air‐change rates





Ene 08 Energy efficient equipment


Assessment criteria Present Major impactRef A Small power and plug in equipment No

Ref B Swimming poolRef C Communal laundry

Ref D Data centreRef E IT‐intensive operation areas Select

Ref F Residential areasRef G Healthcare

Ref H Kitchen and catering facilities

Compliant Credits available Credits achievedSignificant majority contributors BREEAM compliant No 2 0



Assessor commentsnotesCredits not targeted at Design Stage

Ene 09 Drying space Assessment issue not applicable


Assessment criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedResidential internalexternal drying space and fixings NA 0

Total BREEAM credits achieved NA


Total contribution to overall building score NATotal BREEAM innovation credits achieved NA




TRANSPORT

Tra 01 Public Transport Accessibility


Building type category (for purpose of Tra01 issue assessment) Business(officeindustrial)

Business (officeindustrial)

Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedPublic transport accessibility index 000 3 0

Building dedicated bus service No 0



Assessor commentsnotesNo compliant transport nodes within minimum distance

Tra 02 Proximity to Amenities


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedClose proximity and accessible to applicable amenities No 1 0




Assessor commentsnotesNo compliant facilities within minimum distance


Tra 03 Cyclist facilities


Building type category (for purpose of Tra03 issue assessment) Business ‐ (officeIndustrial)Number of compliant cycle storage spaces provided 20

Cyclist facilities provided Showers and changing facilities and lockers

Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedCycle storage spaces Yes 2 2Cyclist facilities Yes

0Total BREEAM credits achieved 2

Total contribution to overall building score 200Total BREEAM innovation credits achieved NA


Assessor commentsnotesOccupancy of 181 persons at anyone time = 18 cycle spaces The development is providing 20 compliant cycle spaces (Ref26)The development includes 11 showers (8 shower rule applies and split between male and female) the changing facilities are appropriately sized for the likelyrequirednumber of users the area includes adequate space and facilities to store clothing and equipment while changing or showering ie lockers and 354 male lockers and 180male lockers The lockers within the compliant changing room

Tra 04 Maximum Car Parking Capacity


Building type category (for purpose of Tra04 issue) Business ‐ (officeIndustrial)Buildings Accessibility Index (sourced from issue Tra01) 0

Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedMaximum parking capacity No 2 0

Total BREEAM credits achieved 0




Assessor commentsnotesCredit not targeted


Tra 05 Travel Plan


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achieved

Transport plan based on site specific travel surveyassessment Yes 1 1




WATER

Wat 01 Water Consumption


Please select the calculation procedure used Standard approach

Standard approach dataWater Consumption from building micro‐components 3172 Lpersonday

Water demand met via greywaterrainwater sources 000 LpersondayTotal net water consumption 1782 Lpersonday

Improvement on baseline performance 4381

Key Performance Indicator ‐ use of freshwater resourceTotal net Water Consumption 1975 m3personyr


Default building occupancy 199347

Alternative approach dataOverall microcomponent performance level achieved

Please select





Wat 02 Water Monitoring


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedWater meter on the mains water supply to the building(s) Yes 1 1

Meteringmonitoring equipment on supply to plantbuilding areas YesPulsed output or other open protocol communication output Yes

Existing BMS connection NA




Wat 03 Water Leak Detection and Prevention


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedLeak detection on buildings mains water supply Yes 1 1

Flow control device to each sanitary areafacility Yes 1 1






Wat 04 Water Efficient Equipment

No of BREEAM credits available 1 Available contribution to overall score 078No of BREEAM innovation credits available No Minimum standards applicable No


Has a meaningful reduction in unregulated water demand been achieved Yes 1 1




MATERIALS

Mat 01 Life Cycle Impacts6


Assessment CriteriaTotal Mat01 credits achieved 2Total Mat01 points achieved 600

Number of building elements assessed 2Exemplary level compliant Yes

Has IMPACT compliant software been used No

Key Performance Indicator ‐ embodied green house gas emissions by elementTotal area ofelement m2

Total impactkgCO2 eq

Area of elementimpact data

relevant to m2

External walls 8087 8936465 8087Windows INA INA INA


Roof 22489 22489 22489Upper floor construction INA INA INA

Internal wall INA INA INAFloor finishescoverings INA INA INA

Key Performance Indicator ‐ embodied green house gas emissions for building (assessed elements only)

Total embodied green house gas emissions for building (by assessed elements) 9161355 kgCO2 eq 3945 kgCO2 eqm2

Proportion of applicable building elements that data reported covers 100





Mat 02 Hard Landscaping and Boundary Protection


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedExternal hard landscaping and boundary protection Yes 1 1




Mat 03 Responsible Sourcing


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedAll timber and timber based products are Legally harvested and trader timber Yes

Is there a documented sustainable procurement plan No 1 0Percentage of available responsible sourcing of materials points achieved 000 3 0

Please confirm the route used to assess Mat03 Please select





Further evidence required to vaildate the credit


Mat 04 Insulation


Assessment Criteria Credits available Credits achievedEmbodied impact ‐ insulation index 300 1 1




Mat 05 Designing for durability and resilience


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedProtecting vulnerable parts of the building from damage Yes 1 1Protecting exposed parts of the building from material degradation Yes





Mat 06 Material efficiency


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedMaterial optimisation measures investigated and implemented at relevant stages No 1 0





WASTE

Wst 01 Construction Waste Management


Assessment Criteria CompliantConstruction resource management plan Yes

Compliant Pre‐demolition audit NADoes the excavation waste meet the exemplary level requirements No

Key Performance Indicators ‐ Construction WasteMeasureunits for the data being reported volume

Non‐hazardous construction waste (excluding demolitionexcavation) 160 m3100m2 Note If data not available then insert INA (ie Indicator not assessed) in the relevant cellTotal non‐hazardous construction waste generated 37157 m3

Non‐hazardous non‐demolition const waste diverted from landfill 7000 Total non‐hazardous non‐demolition const waste diverted from landfill 26010 m3

Total non‐hazardous demolition waste generated Indicator not applicableNon‐hazardous demolition waste diverted from landfill Indicator not applicable

Total non‐hazardous demolition waste to disposal INA Indicator not applicableMaterial for reuse INA m3

Material for recycling INA m3Material for energy recovery INA m3Hazardous waste to disposal INA m3





Wst 02 Recycled Aggregates


Assessment Criteria TotalTotal of high‐grade aggregate that is recycledsecondary aggregate 0

of high‐grade aggregate that is recycledsecondary aggregate ‐ by applicationStructural frame 100

Bitumenhydraulically bound base binder and surface courses 100Building foundations 100

Concrete road surfaces 100Pipe bedding 100

Granular fill and capping 100

Total BREEAM credits achieved 0 0Total contribution to overall building score 000Total BREEAM innovation credits achieved 0 0



Wst 03 Operational Waste


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedSegregation and storage of operational recyclable waste volumes Yes 1 1

Static waste compactor(s) or baler(s) NAVessel(s) for composting suitable organic waste NA






Wst 04 Speculative Floor and Ceiling Finishes Assessment issue not applicable


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedPlease select No NA 0




Wst 05 Adaption to climate change


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedAdaption to climate change ‐ structural and fabric resilience No 1 0

Exemplary level ‐ responding to adaptation to climate change No 1 0





Credit not targeted

Wst 06 Functional adaptability


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedFunctional adaptability No 1 0




LAND USE amp ECOLOGY

LE 01 Site Selection



Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedPreviously occupied land Yes 1 1

Contaminated land Yes 1 1





LE 02 Ecological Value of Site and Protection of Ecological Features


Ecological value of the land defined using A Suitably Qualified Ecologist

Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedLand of low ecological value No 1 0

Protection of ecological features Yes 1 1




LE 03 Mitigating Ecological Impact


Data sourced for calculating the change in ecological value from Suitably Qualified Ecologist site survey of plant species

Assessment CriteriaChange in ecological value ‐865 Plant species richness



Total BREEAM innovation credits achieved NAMinimum standard(s) level Outstanding level



LE 04 Enhancing Site Ecology


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedSuitably Qualified Ecologist appointment (SQE) Yes 2 1

Ecologists report and recommendations YesIncrease in ecological value ‐865 Plant species richness




LE 05 Long Term Impact on Biodiversity


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedSuitably qualified ecologist (SQE) appointed Yes 2 2

Landscape and habitat management plan YesNumber of applicable measures 4

Number of applicable measures implemented 4

Total BREEAM credits achieved 2Total contribution to overall building score 200Total BREEAM innovation credits achieved NA 1





POLLUTION

Pol 01 Impact of Refrigerants


Assessment Criteria Credits available Credits achievedRefrigerant containing systems installed in the assessed building Yes 2 FALSE

BS EN 3782008 and IoR Ammonia Refrigeration Systems CoP (where applicable) NoGlobal Warming Potential of the specified refrigerant(s) 10 or less

Total Direct Effect Life Cycle CO2eq emissions from the system kgCO2eqkW coolth capacityCoolingHeating capacity of the system kW

BREEAM compliant refrigerant leak detection and containment 1 0



Assessor commentsnotesCredit not targetd

Pol 02 NOx Emissions


Assessment CriteriaAre office areas compliant No

NOx emission level ‐ space heating INA mgkWhNOx emission level ‐ cooling INA mgkWh

NOx emission level ‐ water heating mgkWhDoes this building meet BREEAMs definition of a highly insulated building NA

Energy consumption heating and hot water INA kWhm2 yr






Pol 03 Surface Water Run off


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedAnnual probability of flooding Medium 2 1Flood Risk Assessment and ground level of the building and access Yes

Surface water run off ndash peak rate Yes 1 1Surface water run off ndash volume attenuation andor limiting discharge Yes 1 1

Minimising watercourse pollution No 1 0




Pol 04 Reduction of Night Time Light Pollution


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedExternal lighting specification No 1 0





Credit not targetd


Pol 05 Noise Attenuation


Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedNoise‐sensitive areasbuildings within 800m radius of the development Yes 1 1

Noise impact assessment and if applicable noise attenuation measures Yes




INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation

No of BREEAM innovation credits available 10 Available contribution to overall score 1000Minimum standards applicable No

Assessment Criteria Compliant Credits available Credits achievedMan 03 Responsible construction practices No 1 0

Man 05 Aftercare Yes 1 1Hea 01 Visual Comfort No 1 0

Hea 02 Indoor Air Quality No 2 0Ene 01 Reduction of energy use and carbon emissions No 5 0

Wat 01 Water Consumption No 1 0Mat01 Life Cycle Impacts Yes 3 1

Mat03 Responsible Sourcing of Materials No 1 0Wst01 Construction Waste Management No 1 0

Wst02 Recycled Aggregates No 1 0


Wst 05 Adaption to climate change No 1 0

Number of approved innovation credits achieved 0

Total BREEAM innovation credits achieved 2Total contribution to overall building score 200



Assessment References 19022022 Section 4 ‐ Page 57

BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Assessment Report Assessment Validation References


Identifier Assessment Evidence ReferenceAssessmentissue Issue criteria No andor compliance noteAssessors supporting notesinformation

1 10 3429‐141006 Run 3 BRUKL (061014) Ene01 C1 BRUKL document produced by D Green at the Design stage England Approved Document Part L2A 2010Conservation of fuel and power in new buildings other than dwellings 2013 edition ‐ for use in England

2 020 070 Man 04 Commissioning and handover (Building User Guide) from J Robinson toM Dalley(050115)

Man04 C10 The letter from the Principal contractor confirms that a building user guide will be produced prior to handoverfor distribution to the building occupiers and premises managers

3 030 Man 03 Responsible construction practices (Environmental management) from JRobinson to M Dalley (150115)

Man03 C1 2 3 The letter from the Principal contractor confirms that All timber and timber‐based products used on the projectis Legally harvested and traded timber they operate an ISO 14001 environmental management system (EMS)covering their main operations and implement best practice pollution prevention policies and procedures on‐site in accordance with Pollution Prevention Guidelines Working at construction and demolition‐sites PPG6

4 040 Man 03 Responsible Con (Monitoring of construction‐site Impacts) from J Robinson toM Dalley (150115)

Man03 C8‐17 The letter from the Principal contractor confirms that Chris Wootton will be responsible for monitoringrecording and reporting energy water and transport consumption data resulting from all constructionprocesses To ensure the robust collection of information and has the appropriate authority responsibility andaccess to the data required

The letter confirms that the Principal contractor willbull Monitor and record data on principal constructors and subcontractors energy consumption in kWh (andwhere relevant litres of fuel used) as a result of the use of construction plant equipment (mobile and fixed)and site accommodationbull Report the total carbon dioxide emissions (total kgCO2project value) from the construction process

bull Monitor and record data on principal constructors and subcontractors potable water consumption (m3)arising from the use of construction plant equipment (mobile and fixed) and site accommodationbull Using the collated data report the total net water consumption (m3) ie consumption minus any recycledwater use from the construction process

Monitor and record data on transport movements and impacts resulting from delivery of the majority ofconstruction materials to site and construction waste from site As a minimum this must covera Transport of materials from the factory gate to the building site including any transport intermediatestorage and distributionb Scope of this monitoring must cover the following as a minimumi Materials used in major building elements (ie those defined in BREEAM issue Mat 01 Life cycle impacts)including insulation materialsii Ground works and landscaping materialsc Transport of construction waste from the construction gate to waste disposal processingrecovery centregate Scope of this monitoring must cover the construction waste groups outlined in the projects wastemanagement plan

Using the collated data report separately for materials and waste the total fuel consumption (litres) and totalcarbon dioxide emissions (kgCO2 eq) plus total distance travelled (km)

5 050 Man 04 Commissioning and Handover (Commissioning) from J Robinson to M Dalley(150115)

Man04 C1‐6 The letter confirms that commitment that as Principal Contractors for Project Pepe Bowmer and Kirkland Ltdwill comply with all the relevant sections as outlined within credit Man 04 Commissioning and HandoverWhere detailed documentary evidence is not available this letter will provide the BREEAM Assessor with thespecific undertaking completed by Bowmer and Kirkland Ltd

The following commitments are listedOne credit ‐ Commissioning and testing schedule and responsibilitiesbull The commissioning manager is confirmed as Chris Wooton Site Manager Bowmer and Kirkland Ltd John isan appropriate project team member(s) who has been appointed to monitor and programme pre‐commissioning commissioning and where necessary re‐commissioning on behalf of the client bull they confirmcommissioning will be carried out in line with current Building Regulations and BSRIACIBSE guidelines(whichever the more onerous) As necessary the following commissioning codes have been utilised whereapplicable as a whole or in part‐

BSRIA Commissioning Guides Commissioning HVAC Systems Guidance on the division of responsibilities (TM1881) Commissioning of Air Systems (BG 492013) Pre‐Commission Cleaning of Pipework Systems (BG292012) Commissioning Water Systems (BG 22010) Commissioning Job Book ‐ A framework for managing thecommissioning process (BG 112010) CIBSE Commissioning Codes Set of Seven Codes (2003)CIBSE Commissioning Code A Air Distribution Systems (1996 confirmed 2006) ISBN 9780900953736 CIBSECommissioning Code B Boilers ISBN 9781903287293 CIBSE Commissioning Code C Automatic Controls ISBN9781903287132 CIBSE Commissioning Code L Lighting (SLL Commissioning Code L) ISBN 9781903287323CIBSE Commissioning Code M Commissioning Management ISBN 9781903287330 CIBSE Commissioning CodeR Refrigerating Systems ISBN 9781903287286 CIBSE Commissioning Code W Water Distribution SystemsISBN 9781906846152

Bowmer and Kirkland Ltd account for the commissioning programme responsibilities and requirements withinthe main programme of works

One credit ‐ Commissioning building servicesWe confirm Bowmer and Kirkland Ltd have appointed Mark Smith from Derry Building Services as the specialistcommissioning manager for complex systems such asbull Air conditioning Mechanical ventilation displacement ventilation complex passive ventilation BMS and therenewable techs including renewables and Air Source Heat Pumps

The letter confirms the specialist commissioning manager was appointed during the design stage of the projectand was responsible for the followingbull Design input commission ability design reviews bull Commissioning management input to constructionprogramming bull Commissioning management input during installation stages (to be confirmed during theconstruction phase) bull Management of commissioning performance testing and handoverpost‐handoverstages (to be confirmed during the construction phase) Air conditioning

The draft Mamp E commissioning schedule identifies the commissioning programme responsibilities andrequirements for both standard and specialist commissioning requirements


Man05 C3 One credit ‐ Seasonal commissioningThe letter confirms that Bowmer and Kirkland Ltd have a commitment to carry out seasonal commissioningand employ appropriate specialist commissioning sub‐contractors The commitment has been validated by theContractrsquos Manager at Bowmer and Kirkland Ltd The scope of the seasonal commissioning responsibilitiesinvolves all energy systems installed within the building The following is outlinedbull A commitment to carry out seasonal commissioning responsibilities over a minimum 12 month period oncethe building becomes occupied This will include testing of all building services under full load conditions ieheating equipment in mid‐winter coolingventilation equipment in mid‐summer and under part loadconditions (springautumn)bull Where applicable testing will be carried out during periods of extreme (high or low) occupancybull Interviews will be carried out with building occupants (where they are affected by complex services) toidentify problems or concerns regarding the effectiveness of the systemsbull Re‐commissioning of systems (following any work needed to serve revised loads) and incorporating anyrevisions in operating procedures into the OampM manuals will be completedbull Review thermal comfort ventilation and lighting at three six and nine month intervals after initialoccupation either by measurement or occupant feedbackbull Take all reasonable steps to re‐commission systems following the review to take account of deficienciesidentified and incorporate any relevant revisions in operating procedures into the OampM manuals

7 070 Man 04 Comm amp Handover (Testing amp Inspecting Building Fabric) (160115) Man04 C7 8 9 The letter from the principal contractor confirm that they will employ a Suitably Qualified Professional inaccordance with the appropriate standard to undertake a thermographic survey as well as an airtightness testand inspection

The integrity of the building fabric including continuity of insulation avoidance of thermal bridging and airleakage paths will be quality assured through the completion of this post construction testing and inspection

Any defects identified in the thermographic survey or the airtightness testing reports will be rectified prior tobuilding handover and close out Any remedial work will meet the required performance characteristics for thebuildingelement

8 80 BampK ISO 14001 Ceritificate (140212) Man03 C2 Compliant BampK ISO 14001 Certificate9 090 Ene 06 Energy efficient transportation systems letter from J Robinson to M Dalley and

Lift traffic analysis and confirmation letter from Andy Edwards to M Dalley (150115)Ene06 C1 2 3 The letter from the Principal contractor contains the lift analysis data as follows

The lift study provided by the lift specialist confirms that the optimum number and size of lifts (includingcounter‐balancing ratio) has been determined following a review of at least two types of system (for eachtransportation type required) and an arrangement of systems (eg for lifts hydraulic traction MRL)The report forms an analysis of the four energy‐efficient features and identifies the three that offer thegreatest potential energy savings as variable frequency drives energy saving lighting and stand‐by‐mode Thereport confirms that due to the low level nature of the building the system will not perform efficientlyThe lift strategy confirms that the Schindler 3300 has the lowest energy consumptionThe Lift traffic demand or analysis of the transportation demand and usage patterns for the building has beencarried out by the design team to determine the optimum number and size of lifts

10 100 RE Pepe BREEAM Man 03 C3 from J Robinson to M Dalley (110215) Man03 C3 The email from the Principal Contractor contains a completed copy of the Pollution Prevention GuidelinesWorking at construction and demolition‐sites PPG6 for the PEPE site11 110 PPG6 (110215) Man03 C3 A completed copy of the Pollution Prevention Guidelines Working at construction and demolition‐sites PPG6for the PEPE site12 120 List of Stakeholders (010903) Man01 C4 5 6 A list of the stakeholders consulted

13 Consultation Plan (010903) Man01 C4 5 6 A consultation plan setting out the process and the scope of the consultation14 Consultation Date (010903) Man01 C4 5 6 A consultation plan with dates setting out the process and the scope of the consultation15 Consultation Report (010903) Man01 C4 5 6 Consultation report minutes from consultation meetings issues raised and section highlighting consultation

feedback and subsequent actions16 Community Pages Archive ‐ Omega (120315) Man01 C4 5 6 Website for community engagement for the OMEGA Warrington site including tweets news and link toconsultation17 Public Consultation Feedback website ‐ Omega Man01 C4 5 6 Website for community engagement for the OMEGA Warrington site including specific Public consultationdetails and feedback18 Newsletter ‐ Omega (120315) Man01 C4 5 6 Omega Warrington Newsletter with details of consultation and feedback given to the community detailingremaining meetings with contact details etc

19 Omega‐Community‐Newsletter‐3‐Winter‐2014‐(141114) Man01 C4 5 6 Omega Warrington Newsletter with details of consultation20 OmegaConsultationPanels‐v2 (120315) Man01 C4 5 6 Omega South Public consultation panels used to detail the proposed sites including details of how to get

involved with and steer the design21 Omega‐Newsletter‐Summer‐2013 (120315) Man01 C4 5 6 Omega Warrington Newsletter with details of consultation22 Omega‐Newsletter‐Winter‐2014 (120315) Man01 C4 5 6 Omega Warrington Newsletter with details of consultation23 Omega‐Zone‐7‐Consultation‐Statement (120315) Man01 C4 5 6 Full consultation report and response to the proposals to zone 7 which includes the Utopia development The

report confirms that a number of stakeholder presentations and meetings were held with the OmegaPartnership Group parish councils David Mowatt MP and Whittlehall Ward Themes and issues raised in themeetings are included within the lsquoteamrsquos response to issues raisedrsquo table provided in section 4 Section 4summaries the major themes arising from the consultation process and includes the feedback and confirmsthat the findings of the consultation influences the design and therefore must have been held before key andfinal design decisions were made The report also contains a breakdown of issues raised and confirms that theminimum consultation content has been included as follows1 Functionality Build Quality and Impact (including aesthetics) ‐ New buildings should be below tree lines ndash likeOmega North almost are ‐Concern about more large warehouses like ASDA creating an eyesore2 Provision of appropriate internal and external facilities (for future building occupants and visitorsusers)Concerns about loss of green space even with Green Heart ‐ Support for cycle paths and retaining of greenspaces ‐ Green Heart could provide an area for allotment to get the community involved in the site3 Management and operational implicationsRoundabouts in Burtonwood are not big enough to accommodate traffic increase4 Maintenance resources implicationsNeed for greater reassurance that shift patterns of HGV traffic will be proactively managed outside of rush hourperiods5 Impacts on the local community eg Local traffictransport impactConcerns about Burtonwood Road roundabout capacity ‐ even with a change to intelligent traffic lights6 Opportunities for shared use of facilities and infrastructure with the communityappropriate stakeholders ifrelevantappropriate to building typeGreen Heart could provide an area for allotment to get the community involved in the site7 Compliance with statuary (nationallocal) consultation requirementsLocal Development Framework (LDF)

24 Omega South Consulatation Photos (120315) Man01 C4 5 6 Consultation photos provided to support the above evidence25 250 Project Pepe Responsibilities Matrix (120114) Man01 C1‐3 The responsibilities matrix for Project Pepe confirms at RIBA Stage 2 the project delivery stakeholders have

identified and defined their roles responsibilities and contributions for each of the key phases of projectdelivery ie Concept Design Developed Design Construction Commissioning and HandoverIn‐Use occupation The matrix defines their roles and responsibilities for each key phase of the project thefollowing must be considered a End user requirements b Aims of the design and design strategy c Particularinstallation and construction requirementslimitations d Occupiers budget and technical expertise inmaintaining any proposed systems e Maintainability and adaptability of the proposals f Requirements for theproduction of project and end user documentation g Requirements for commissioning training and aftercaresupport

26 260 3793‐135‐01 Typical cyclemotorcycle and smoking shelter‐A1 (100215) Tra03 C1 The architects drawing for Pepe confirms that a cycle store has been included which is located within 10m ofthe entrance to the building and viewable The store contains 20 compliant spaces Cycles can be securedwithin spaces in rack(s)The cycle spaces are covered overhead and the cycle racks (Sheffield type) are fixed to apermanent structure (hardstanding) the distance between each cycle rack and cycle racks and otherobstructions eg a wall allows for appropriate access to the cycle storage space to enable bikes to be easilystored and accessed

27 270 3793‐140‐08 External Protection Plan (170215) Mat05 C1 The drawing provided by Chetwoods architects confirms that there is provision for the protection against orprevention from any potential vehicular collision where vehicular parking and manoeuvring occurs within 1mof the external building faccedilade for all car parking areas and within 2m for all delivery areasThe drawing also identifies the inclusion of internal bollards located internally next to the docking points

28 280 HEA 01 Lighting Strategy 090315 Hea01 C7 8 910 11

The lighting strategy document from Derry building services confirms that as designers and installers of theElectrical installations confirm that‐

Internal Lighting All fluorescent and compact fluorescent lamps are fitted with high frequency ballastsInternal lighting in all relevant areas of the building has been designed to provide an illuminance (lux) levelappropriate to the tasks undertaken accounting for building user concentration and comfort levels This hasbeen demonstrated through lighting calculations which are in accordance with the SLL Code for Lighting 2012For areas where computer screens are regularly used the lighting design complies with CIBSE Lighting Guide 7sections 33 46 47 48 and 49

External Lighting All external lighting located within the construction zone has been designed to provideilluminance levels that enable users to perform outdoor visual tasks efficiently and accurately especially duringthe night The external lighting provided has been selected in accordance with BS 5489‐12013 Lighting of roadsand public amenity areas and BS EN 12464‐22014 Light and lighting ‐ Lighting of work places ndash Part 2 Outdoorwork places

Zoning and Occupant Control Internal lighting is zoned to allow for occupant control in accordance with thecriteria for relevant areas presentwithin the building

29 290 317‐TS‐E‐005 Rev 0 ‐ Lighting Controls (120315) Hea01 C7 8 910 12

The lighting controls strategy confirms that 5 handheld programming devices will be provided at handover toallow the tenant to make simple control modifications to each stand‐alone lighting control sensor The reportconfirm that in Office Areas and Meeting Rooms automatic absence detection and daylight linked constantlevel dimming with manual override will be included as follows bull In office areas zones of no more than fourworkplaces ndash or where the final layout is not known zones of 40sqm grids will be required bull Workstationsadjacent to windows atria and other building areas will be separately zoned and controlledThe report confirms that in the Reception area an automatic absence detection and daylight linked constantlevel dimming with manual override will be includedAdditionally the report confirms that the Toilet Changing and General Store Areas will include automaticpresence detection with adjustable lsquooffrsquo time delayAll circulation Corridors amp Staircases will include automatic presence detection with adjustable lsquooffrsquo time delayAll Plant Rooms Risers and Ancillary areas will be design with manual switching to the following rooms withinthe ancillary area bull Raw Materials bull Compressed air room bull TBGT bull Paint mixing bull Paint store bull Air lockbull Transformer bull Osmosis bull Maintenance bull Cooling water pumps

In the Injection bay and Warehouse Areas automatic presence detection with adjustable lsquodimrsquo time delay andconstant level daylight linked dimming with manual override (minimum lsquodimrsquo level 10 adjustable) will beincluded Any adjacent luminaires to be supplied from alternate Phases Control circuits L1‐L2‐L3 (Eachadjacent lighting bus‐bar will be on alternate phases) The report confirms that the lighting controls in this areawill be zoned as follows bull Injection Bay bull Warehouse Bay 1 bullWarehouse Bay 2 bull Warehouse Bay 3 bullWarehouse Bay 4

Finally Canopies will be switched via photocell and time clock arrangement

30 300 317‐E‐110 Rev B ‐ Drivers Lighting And Emergency Lighting Layout (110315) Hea01 C7 8 910 12

The drawing confirm that the Driving Area lighting has been designed to separate the office area the toilet andshower areas The office area has both PIR and manual switching however due to the lack of seating layout andits size being below 40sqm the requirement for workplace zoning is not applicable

31 310 317‐E‐120 Rev A ‐ Ground Floor Office Lighting And Emergency Lighting Layout(110315)

Hea01 C7 8 910 12

The Ground floor layout corroborates Ref 28amp29 and confirms that the Office Areas Meeting and trainingrooms have automatic absence detection and daylight linked constant level dimming with manual overrideThe use of smart controls to enable manual control of each light fitting covers the zoning requirements in theseareas ie zones of no more than four workplaces workstations adjacent to windowsatria and other buildingareas separately zoned and controlled and teaching space or demonstration area or whiteboard or displayscreen The drawing confirms that toilets changing and General Store Areas will include automatic presencedetection with adjustable lsquooffrsquo time delayThe reception area has an automatic absence detection and daylight linked constant level dimming withmanual override switch located behind the reception desk for staff only controlAll circulation Corridors amp Staircases are separately controlled and include automatic presence detectionThe canteen space doesnt have a servery area and thus does not require separate zoning


32 320 317‐E‐121 Rev A ‐ First Floor Office Lighting And Emergency Lighting Layout (110315) Hea01 C7 8 910 12

The First floor layout corroborates Ref 28amp29 and confirms that the Office Areas conference war and bigbubble rooms have automatic absence detection and daylight linked constant level dimming with manualoverride The use of smart controls to enable manual control of each light fitting or the minimum 40sqm areacovers the zoning requirements in these areas ie zones of no more than four workplaces workstationsadjacent to windowsatria and other building areas separately zoned and controlled and teaching space ordemonstration area or whiteboard or display screen The drawing confirms that toilets changing and GeneralStore Areas will include automatic presence detection with adjustable lsquooffrsquo time delay All circulation Corridorsamp Staircases are separately controlled and include automatic presence detection

33 330 317‐E‐500 Rev A External Lighting Layout (110315) Ene03 C3 The external lighting drawing confirms that all external light fittings are automatically controlled for preventionof operation during daylight hours and presence detection in areas of intermittent pedestrian traffic34 340 Project Pepe FRA for BRREAM (First Issue) (130315) Pol03 C2 amp 4‐14 The site‐specific flood risk assessment (FRA) confirms the Omega South Project Pepe development is situatedin a flood zone that is defined as having a low annual probability of flooding in accordance with current bestpractice national planning guidance ie in accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) andBREEAM New Construction Technical Manual 2014 The FRA takes all current and future sources of floodinginto consideration including Fluvial Tidal Surface Water Groundwater Sewers Reservoirs canals and otherartificial sources The pre‐development risk from all sources of flooding except of surface water is low Severallocalised low spots along the northern and eastern boundaries of the site experience surface water pondingduring the 1 in 100 year storm event which means these areas are at a medium risk of surface water floodingThe Project Pepe Site is situated in an area that is defined as having a low annual probability of flooding

The FRA Report Also contains evidence for the Surface Water Run‐off credits and confirms the following Thedrainage strategy provides for attenuation storage in the form of a detention basin which limits discharge intothe watercourse on the western boundary of the site to no more than the existing greenfield run‐off rateThe report confirms that the attenuation storage has been sized to retain run‐off for up to the 1 in 100 yearstorm event plus a 20 allowance for climate change and that the surface water infrastructure within thewider Omega South development excluding highway drainage within the demise of the carriageway will bemaintained privately by an appointed management companyThe Microdrainage model showing that the post development run‐off volume is greater than that existingvolume for the 1 in 100 year 6 hour event however the existing geology within the site means that the use ofinfiltration SUDS features is not viable on this development consequently the The designed surface waterdrainage network ensures that the post development peak rate of run‐off from the Project Pepe Site is reducedto the limiting discharge rate of the mean annual flow rate (QBar) of 275 lsec which is greater than the 1 in 1year greenfield run‐off rate (2390 lsec) and the 20 lsecha rate (1082 lsec)

35 350 23 0 Mat 03 PEPE Responsible sourcing of materials Letter from the principalcontractor (190515)

Mat03 C1 The letter from the principal contractor confirms that the all timber used on site will be sourced in accordancewith the UK the UK Government Timber Procurement Policy in line with the requirements for Legally harvestedand traded timber The letter also confirms that the contractor commits to score

36 350 Appendix E BREEAM 2014 Guidance Note GN15 (130315) Pol03 C4 ‐ 14 The signed and completed Guidance Note GN15 relating drainage reports to BREEAM has been extracted fromREF 340 the required surface run‐off calculations are included in Ref 340 Appendices of the report includingsite plans and flood risk plans

Section A has been completed by myself and the rest of the document completed and signed off by AlexanderGriffin The completed document confirms in Section B Assessment Information that building is being assessedindependently where the run‐off is being dealt with on a building by building basis (ie each building has itsown dedicated sub‐catchment that serves only that building)Site area = 541haImpermeable area of the site pre‐development = 0haImpermeable area of the site post development = 468haThe report confirms that the highways are being adopted and that the building(s) will be located beside existinghighways already adopted

Section C ‐ Pre‐RequisiteThe report confirms that Alexander Griffin is appropriate consultant as defined by BREEAMSection DFIRST CREDIT Peak Rate of Run‐offPre‐development peak rate of run‐off for the 1 year return period event = 2390lsPost‐development peak rate of run‐off for the 1 year return period event = 1690ls (the figure uis below pre‐development above)Pre‐development peak rate of run‐off for the 100 year return period event = 5713lsPost‐development peak rate of run‐off for the 100 year return period event = 2600ls (the figure uis below pre‐development above)The report provides the following brief explanation describing how the peak rate will be reduced as followsHydrobrake installed downstream of detention basin to reduce peak rate of run off to pre‐development levelsThe report confirms that the post development peak rate of run‐off calculations include an allowance forclimate change in accordance with current best practice planning guidelinesThe report confirms that the assessed project is located on a greenfield site and is less than 50 ha therefore run‐off rate calculations have been carried out in accordance with the IH Report 124 lsquoFlood estimation for smallcatchmentsrsquo (Marshall and Bayliss 1994) The pro‐rata method on the size of catchment detailed in table 42 ofthe SuDS manual has been usedSECOND CREDIT Volume of Run‐offThe report confirms that flooding of property will not occur in the event of local drainage system failure(caused by extreme rainfall or lack of maintenance)The report confirms that the following post development volume of run‐off calculations include an allowancefor climate change in accordance with current best practice planning guidelinesThe report also confirms that the following volume of run‐off calculations are for the 100 year event of 6 hourdurationPre‐development volume of run‐off = 85406m2Post development volume of run‐off caused by the new development prior to mitigation = 3336879m2The additional predicted volume of rainwater caused by the new development prior to mitigation =3251473m2As the figure above is is greater than zero the engineer has provided a brief explanation describing how theyhave reduced the additional volume discharged from the developed site The underlying ground conditionsprevent reduction in additional volume discharged from the developed siteThe report clarifies that additional volume of run‐off discharged from the site remains as above (due to the ) =3251473m2it has not been possible to reduce all of the additional volume by infiltration or other SuDS techniques thevolume of run‐off should be discharged in accordance with one of the following rates of run‐off whichever isthe higher as follows The peak discharge rate has been reduced to the sitersquos estimated mean annual flood flowrate (Qbar) 2750ls

37 370 RE Project Pepe ‐ Flood Risk Assessment from Sandy Griffin to M Dalley (190315) Pol03 C13 The email from the drainage flood risk specialist and designers on the development confirms that the OmegaSouth (Zone 7) Management Company Limited will be responsible for surface water infrastructure within thewider Omega South development which is administrated by Colliers38 380 317‐ energy monitoring pepe (090315) Ene02 C1‐4 The report by Derry Building Services as designers and installers of the Mechanical amp Electrical installationsconfirms that energy metering systems are installed that enable at least 90 of the estimated annual energyconsumption of each fuel to be assigned to the various end‐use categories of energy consuming systems Theenergy consuming systems in buildings with a total useful floor area greater than 1000m2 are metered usingan appropriate energy monitoring and management system Additionally the report end energy consuminguses are identifiable to the building users for example through labelling or data outputs



39 390 317‐E‐001 ‐ Metering Schematic Rev 0 pepe (260115) Ene02 C1‐4 The schematic provides a detailed description of the electrical metering strategy for the entire developmentand confirms that the power and lighting have been submetered within the development the lift has beenmetered external lighting the plant equipment within the Operational area including paint robots andoperation equipment and the HVAC Plant Boards The schematic confirms that the office areas and operationalareas are separately metered

40 400 PM750 power meter data sheet pepe (190315) Ene02 C1‐4 The manufacturers data sheets provided by Derry (see Ref 38 for details) confirms that the energy sub‐metersare of the type with pulsed

41 410 PM5110 power meter data sheet 2 pepe (190315) Ene02 C1‐4 The manufacturers data sheets provided by Derry (see Ref 38 for details) confirms that the energy sub‐metersare of the type with pulsed

42 420 317‐BREEAM‐ENE 03 External Lighting Rev 0 (130315) Ene03 C2‐3 The Derry Building Services report confirms that as designers and installers of the Electrical installations theaverage initial luminous efficacy of the external light fittings within the construction zone is not less than 60luminaire lumens per circuit Watt Additionally the report confirms that all external light fittings areautomatically controlled for prevention of operation during daylight hours with presence detection in areas ofintermittent pedestrian traffic

43 430 317‐E‐500 Rev A External Lighting Layout (130315) Ene03 C2‐3 The external lighting drawing confirms that all external light fittings are automatically controlled for preventionof operation during daylight hours and presence detection in areas of intermittent pedestrian traffic44 440 317‐TS‐E‐012 Rev A ‐ External Lighting (130315) Ene03 C2‐3 The external lighting technical submission document contains an external lighting drawing produced by DerryKingfisher page 18 confirms the following lighting strategyKaos 1 ‐ (23qty 9500Lm = 218500) (23qty 1137Lm) = 8355 LmW 792 = 6617 LmWAludra ‐ (28qty 14000Lm = 392000) (28qty 1685Lm) = 8308 LmW 730 = 6065 LmWAludra ‐ (15qty 28300Lm = 424500) (15qty 2775Lm) = 10198 LmW 730 = 6617 LmWKaos 1 ‐ (2qty 1400 Lm = 2800) (2qty 1685Lm) = 8309 LmW 792 = 6580 LmWAludra LED ‐ (8qty 9486Lm = 75888) (8qty 100Lm) = 9488 LmW 1000 = 9488 LmW

45 450 project pepe SBD application email from A Jordan to A Williams (130315) Hea06 C11 The email confirms that an application has been made for SBD to the Suitably Qualified Security Specialist(SQSS) Andy Williams of Cheshire police46 460 3793‐SBD application (1303150) Hea06 C11 The SBD application form confirms that the consultation has been sought the Suitably Qualified SecuritySpecialist (SQSS)47 470 RE breeam Mat05 project pepe email from A jordan to M Dalley (170315) Mat05 C1b Email from the architect contains Sketch layout attached showing protection to exposed corners in the Officesand wall rail to the canteen from internal vehiculartrolley movement within 1m of the internal building fabric48 480 3557‐internal protection (170315) Mat05 C1b The internal protection drawing identifies the location and inclusion of corner protection and walls rails in thecanteen area49 490 317‐E‐120 Rev A ‐ Ground Floor Office Lighting And Emergency Lighting Layout

(110315)Tra03 C3 The drawings confirms that the development will include 11 showers (8 shower rule applies and split between

male and female) the changing facilities are appropriately sized for the likelyrequired number of users thearea includes adequate space and facilities to store clothing and equipment while changing or showering ielockers and 354 male lockers and 180 male lockers The lockers within the compliant changing room

50 500 Pepe BREEAM Training Schedule email from Jim Robinson to M Dalley (260315) Man04 C11 The email from the Principal Contractor contains a draft training schedule for the development (see Ref 510)

51 510 Draft Training Schedule (2603105) Man04 C11 The training schedule has been designed the for building occupier premises managers and is timedappropriately around handover and proposed occupation plans which includes the following content as aminimumThe buildingrsquos design intentIntroduction to and demonstration of installed systems and key features particularly building managementsystems controls and their interfacesInduction to the Building User Guide and other relevant building documentation eg design data technicalguides maintenance strategy operations and maintenance (OampM) manual commissioning records log booketc

52 520 3429 Pepe Omega ‐ LZC Feasibility Study from A Carrington to M Dalley (310315) Ene04 C7 The email from the Mech designer and Low Carbon Consultant A Carrington contains an LZC feasibility studyand confirms that it has been carried out by the completion of the Concept Design stage (RIBA Stage 2)53 530 3429‐141015‐AC‐LZC Feasibility Study rev0 (151014) Ene04 C7 The LZC report confirms the energy generated from LZC energy source per year the carbon dioxide savingsfrom LZC energy source per year life cycle cost of the potential specification accounting for payback localplanning criteria including land use and noise feasibility of exporting heatelectricity from the systemavailable grants all technologies appropriate to the site and energy demand of the development reasons forexcluding other technologies and the potential for connection to local community energy schemes

The report confirms that the offices which represent approximately 90 of the total enclosed area will beheated and cooled using air source heat pumps which will provide a renewable energy content ofapproximately 125 of the base development load

The report confirm that PV is also considered to be a suitable form of technology however the costs associatedwith its incorporation to achieve the 10 saving would make the development unviable

The development has been future proofed to allow a photovoltaic array to be installed on the roof should therebe a desire from the future tenant to achieve further carbon and energy savings In order to exceed the 10energy from on‐site renewable energy via the use of photovoltaics an area of 760m2 of the roof area has beenallocated as suitable for use by a future tenant to install photovoltaics

54 540 317 Pepe MampE Draft Commissioning POW (081214) Man04 C1 Project Pepe Draft MampE Commissioning Programme of Works identifies the timescales and systems to becommissioned including specialist equipment

55 550 Project Pepe ‐ draft commissioning programme (260315) Man05 C3 The programme confirms that seasonal commissioning activities will be completed over a minimum 12‐monthperiod including winter spring summer and autumn commissioning56 560 20150317‐BampK‐Wst01 Construction Waste Letter from J Robinson to M Dalley

(170315)Wst02 C1‐5 The letter from the principal contractor provides a commitment to reducing our non‐hazardous construction

waste (excluding demolition and excavation waste) generated by the buildingrsquos design and construction anddedicated off‐site manufacture fabrication to bull lt 34 m3 of waste OR lt 32 tonnes of waste per 100m2 ofgross internal floor areaThey also commit to ensuring that bull 70 by volume (or 80 by tonnage) of non‐demolition waste will bediverted from landfill AND 80 by volume (or 90 by tonnage) of demolition waste will be diverted fromlandfill

Final the letter commits BampK to produce a Resource Management Plan (RMP) covering the non‐hazardouswaste related to on‐site construction and dedicated off‐site manufacture or fabrication (including demolitionand excavation waste) generated by the buildingrsquos design and construction



57 570 20150317‐BampK‐LE02 Ecological Letter from J Robinson to M Dalley (170315) LE02 C2 3 The letter from the principal contractor confirms that BampK commit adequately protect all existing features ofecological value within the assessment zone from damage during clearance site preparation and constructionactivities in line with BS42020 2013 and that such protection measures will be constructed by a suitablyqualified ecologist prior to any preliminary site construction activities

58 580 Omega Pepe BREEAM 2014 Guide Note (270315) LE02 C3 The Guidance Note GN13 Relating ecologistrsquos report to BREEAM completed by the SQE (see REF 630) confirmsthat there are featuresareas of ecological value that fall within or surround the construction zone or siteboundary area The report provides the following description the site is bordered by a small area ofbroadleaved woodland to the north‐west semi‐improved grassland with scattered trees to the north and eastand damp grassland to the southFinally the report confirms that the principal contractor constructed ecological protection measures inaccordance with the ecologists recommendationsprior to any preliminary site construction or preparation works (eg clearing of the site or erection oftemporary site facilities)

59 590 20150317‐BampK‐Hea 02 Indoor Air Quality Letter from J Robinson to M Dalley(170315)

Hea02 C8‐12 The letter confirms that commitment that as Principal Contractors for Project Pepe Bowmer and Kirkland Ltdto carry out the following post construction (but pre‐occupancy) Formaldehyde and VOC testing to ensure thelevels outlined below are achieved bull Post construction (but pre‐occupancy) Formaldehyde measuredconcentration levels of less than or equal to 100μgm3 averaged over 30 minutes (WHO guidelines for indoorair quality Selected pollutants 2010) bull Total volatile organic compound (TVOC) concentration of less than300μgover 8 hours in line with the Building Regulation requirements

If levels are found to exceed these limits BampK confirm that measures will be undertaken in accordance with theIndoor Air Quality Plan to reduce the TVOC and formaldehyde levels to within the above limits

The letter confirms that the testing and measurement of the above pollutants will be in accordance with thefollowing standards where relevant a BS ISO 16000‐4 2011 Diffusive sampling of formaldehyde in air b BS ISO16000‐6 2011 VOCs in air by active sampling c BS EN ISO 16017‐2 2003 VOCs ‐ Indoor ambient and workplaceair by passive sampling d BS ISO 16000‐3 2011 formaldehyde and other carbonyls in air by pumped sampling

60 600 BampK Monitoring Mechanisms (190315) Man03 C10 13 16 The zip folder contains a series of monitoring and recording data sheets utilised by the principal contractor andprovided as examples of the methodology used to record site utility consumption61 610 SWMP Project Pepe (010415) Wst01 all The SWMP provided by the Principal Contractor has been provided as the Resource Management Plan (RMP)for the development which has been developed covering the non‐hazardous waste related to on‐siteconstruction and dedicated off‐site manufacture or fabrication (including demolition and excavation waste)generated by the buildingrsquos design and construction The SWMP has been written in line with the best practiceconstruction waste management plan

62 620 Poject pepe ‐ occupancy levels from J Robinson to M Dalley (0315) Tra03 all The email from the principal contractor confirms that the development will have an occupancy pattern ofOffice ndash 61 working 0800 ndash 1800 Monday to Friday and a warehouse shift of 120 people Consequently thetotal users at anyone time would be 181

63 630 Omega Pepe BREEAM 2014 Guide Note (270315) LE03 C1 The guidance note GN13 Relating ecologistrsquos report to BREEAM completed by Camilla Winder the SQE confirmsthat she hold a degree in ecology and related subjects as follows BSc Ecology (Hons) 2‐1 University of Sheffield1996 MSc Soil Science University of Aberdeen 1999 MPhil Plant amp Soil Science University of Aberdeen 2002and is a practising ecologist with a minimum of 3 years relevant experience within the last 5 years as follows2011‐present Senior Ecologist Ecology Practice 2008‐2010 RSPB Lapwing Project Officer South Wales 2007Grassland Survey Officer Gwent Wildlife Trust 2005‐2006 Ecologist Cheshire Ecological Services 2004Ecologist Wardell Armstrong Camila is bound by a professional code of conduct and subject to peer review Fullmember MCIEEM (Chartered Institute for Ecology amp Environmental Management)The report confirms that the ecologist is able to provide the following information about the site for its pre‐construction and post‐construction state including the broad habitat type(s) and an estimate of the number offloral species present per broad habitat type (based on appropriate census techniques andconfirmed planting regimes) The Ecologists provides the following statement on these issues The sitecomprises an extensive area of neutraldamp semi‐improved species‐poor grassland comprising tufted hairgrass hard rush soft rush cocks foot Yorkshire fog false oatgrass and others with scattered mature scruband trees comprising predominantly hawthorn sessile oak silver birch grey willow and goat willow The widerOmega South site comprises arable and improved grassland with scattered scrub trees and patches of marshygrassland There are recent industrial developments to the north and south The M62 forms the northernboundary of the Omega South development the surrounding area to the west comprises similar arable andimproved grassland to the south residential developments and to the north industrial developments andmanaged farmland

The report further identifies the site details before and after development and provides calculation of theEcological Value of the Site Before and after Development including the Broad habitat type Area of broadhabitat type (m2) Average total tax on richness (see BREEAM issue LE 03 for definition) and Average totaltaxon richness x Area of broad habitat type

These details have been entered into the LE0304 calc see REF 640

64 640 BREEAM_2014_LE03_LE04_Calculator (130415) LE03 C1 The completed BREEAM_2014_LE03_LE04_Calculator tool based on the information provided by the SQE inReference 630 confirms that the development achieves a change in ecological value of ‐865 for the site whichis less than zero but equal to or greater than minus nine plant species ie a minimal change Consequently Onecredit can be awarded

65 650 Omega Pepe BREEAM 2014 Guide Note (270315) LE04 C1 2 3 The guidance note completed by the SQE (see Ref 630) confirms that the client developer has required theecologist to provide advice and make recommendations for enhancing site ecology and the ecologist wasappointed to give this advice before the completion of the Preparation and Brief Stage of the project RIBAStage 1 or equivalent The note provides the following brief statement outlining the advice recommendationsgiven on enhancing the ecological value of the site these recommendations are included in the wider OmegaSouth Ecological Assessment report Omega South Ecological Protection Plan for Construction Omega SouthCondition Discharge 25 amp 28 and Omega South Habitat Management Plan Although theses reports cover thewider Omega South site in relation to Project Pepe this will include planting of native woodland and groundflora and native hedgerows Across the wider Omega South site habitat enhancements will also include nativewetland and grassland habitats and additional woodland and hedgerow planting Nest boxes for birds and batson will be provided on building eaves

The report further identifies the site details before and after development and provides calculation of theEcological Value of the Site Before and after Development including the Broad habitat type Area of broadhabitat type (m2) Average total tax on richness and Average total taxon richness x Area of broad habitat type


66 660 BREEAM_2014_LE03_LE04_Calculator (130415) LE04 C1 2 3 The completed BREEAM_2014_LE03_LE04_Calculator tool based on the information provided by the SQE inReference 650 confirms that the development will achieve one credit based on the implementation of thegeneral recommendations of the Ecology Report for enhancement and protection of site ecology have been orwill be implemented

67 670 Omega Pepe BREEAM 2014 Guide Note (270315) LE05 The guidance note completed by the SQE (see Ref 630) confirms that the ecologist was appointed prior tocommencement of development work activities on site and the developer given the ecologist the responsibilityto confirm whether all relevant current EU and UK legislation relating to protection and enhancement ofecology has been complied with during the design and construction process and provides the following detailson all relevant current EU and UK legislation that relates to the site All breeding bird habitat was removedoutside of the bird breeding season To avoidminimise disturbance to bats felling of trees was carried outduring late autumnearly spring and any trees with potential to support bats were inspected prior to felling tocheck for presence of bats Trees with hollow limb sections were soft felled to allow any bats undetected toescape over 24hours before wood was removedThe guidance note confirms that the developer client requested that the ecologist produce an appropriatelandscape and habitat management plan covering atleast the first 5 years after project completion in accordance with BS 420202013 and the SQE has provided thefollowing brief outline of the management plan A plan is in preparation (Omega South Habitat ManagementPlan‐Ecology Practice) which will include habitat management recommendations for hedgerows trees andgrassland habitats within the Project Pepe site boundary as well as guidance on management of newly createdwoodland and hedgerows grassland wetland and pond habitats across the Omega South site These willinclude recommendations to maximise opportunities for wildlife through planting native species and timing ofworks etc re creation of new habitats and good practice habitat managementThe guidance confirms that the developer has required that the ecologist to provide recommendations andadvice to minimise detrimental impacts on sitebiodiversity and the SQE has described the following recommendation included guidance re timing of tree andvegetation removal to minimise disturbance to bats breeding birds and brown hare An ecological clerk ofworks has been present since works commenced (December 2014) and during continued works (March 2015)The responsibilities of the ecologist to the developer include providing advice and recommendations for theprotection of ecological features and the SQE has described the following recommendation include selectionof suitable native species for landscape planting schemes to create new woodland hedgerow and grasslandhabitat on the Pepe site as well as creation of more extensive new habitat areas within the Omega Southdevelopment An ecological clerk of works has visited site at start (December 2014) and during works (March205) to ensure ecological features are protectedThe ecologistrsquos responsibilities to the developer include providing advice on the creation of a new ecologicallyvaluable habitat which is appropriate to the local area and is either nationally regionally or locally importantor supports nationally regionally or locally important biodiversity and the SQE has described the followingrecommendation include native hedgerows and broadleaved tree planting wild flower grassland andwetlandmarshy grassland in open swales detention basins These will contribute to targets for Habitat ActionPlans within the Cheshire BAP for Woodland Parkland Ponds HedgerowsThe ecologistrsquos responsibilities to the developer include providing advice and recommendations on when siteworks are to be avoided so as to minimise the disturbance to wildlife and the SQE has described the followingrecommendation a schedule for development works in relation to ecological constraints An ecological clerk ofworks has been present at start of construction phase (December 2014) and during works (March 2015 amp on‐going) to ensure ecological features are protected Timing of works has been an important feature determiningconstruction schedules eg relating to vegetation removal etc



68 680 Remediation Strategy and MMP (4) signed RAL (271114) LE01 C2 3 The Remediation Strategy and implementation plan (MMP) report completed by Rebecca Colvin contaminatedland specialist confirms that the site has asbestos containing materials at the site and provides the concentration levels in section 222 The report confirms that encapsulation is appropriate for these materialsbeneath a covering layer or offsite disposal as a waste material

The report also confirms that elevated levels of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) and carbazole have been detected atseparate locations at the site and that remediation options for the treatment of these organic contaminants ina clay soil are limited to excavation and disposal encapsulation stabilisation or bioremediation methods andprovides the con centration levels in section 222 Encapsulation is appropriate for these materials as it willblock the pathways available The use of this material in public open space below a minimum 450mm clean soilcover layer to prevent incidental exposure and dust generation should be sufficient to reduce the risk to levelssuitable for use

The report contains site plans location documents remediation strategy drawings and location and footprint(m2) of proposed development and temporary works

69 690 Rebecca Colvin CV (170415) LE01 C2 3 The CV confirms that Rebecca Colvin meets the definition of a contaminated land specialist Rebecca is a SeniorGeo‐Environmental Consultant for WSP in the Land Restoration and Ground Engineering team With a degreein BSc Geography MSc Environmental Science Policy and Management and 4 years experience within thesectored

70 700 Pepe ‐ historic land useage (160415) LE01 C1 The development is contained within the existing Burtonwood RAF USAF base which was decommissioned in1966 (less than 50 years ago) The storage bunkers were removed in late 2008 and early 2009 The Pepebuilding and site is 100 located within land that was previously developed for storage bunkers and associatedfixed surface infrastructure

71 710 86913_1_MSR_161721 (020415) Man03 C7 The compliant CCS scheme report confirms that the development achieves a score of 35 and score of 7 in eachof the five sections72 720 Hea 02 Indoor Air Quality Plan (150414) Hea02 C1 The indoor air quality plan has been produced with the objective of facilitating a process that leads to designspecification and installation decisions and actions that minimise indoor air pollution during occupation of thebuilding The indoor air quality plan considers the following a Removal of contaminant sources b Dilution andcontrol of contaminant sources c Procedures for pre‐occupancy flush out d Third party testing and analysis eMaintaining indoor air quality in‐use

73 730 Man 05 Aftercare ‐ Aftercare support from Jim Robertson to M Dalley (120415) Man05 C1‐2 The letter from the principal contractor confirms as Principal Contractors for Project Pepe Bowmer andKirkland Ltd will put in place the required operational infrastructure and resources to provide aftercaresupport to the building occupier(s) which includes the following as a minimum a A meeting programmed tooccur between the aftercare teamindividual and the building occupiermanagement (prior to initialoccupation or as soon as possible thereafter) to i Introduce the aftercare team or individual to the aftercaresupport available including the Building User Guide (where existing) and training schedulecontent ii Presentkey information about the building including the design intent and how to use the building to ensure itoperates as efficiently and effectively as possible b On‐site facilities management training to include awalkabout of the building and introduction to and familiarisation with the building systems their controls andhow to operate them in accordance with the design intent and operational demands c Initial aftercare supportprovision for at least the first month of building occupation eg on‐site attendance on a weekly basis tosupport building users and management (this could be more or less frequent depending on the complexity ofthe building and building operations) d Longer term aftercare support provision for occupants for at least thefirst 12 months from occupation eg a helpline nominated individual or other appropriate system to supportbuilding usersmanagement

There will be operational infrastructure and resources in place to co‐ordinate the collection and monitoring ofenergy and water consumption data for a minimum of 12 months once the building is occupied This will bedone to facilitate analysis of discrepancies between actual and predicted performance with a view to adjustingsystems andor user behaviours accordingly

74 740 Man 05 Aftercare (post occupancy evaluation (120415) Man05 C4 The letter from the principal contractor confirm that they will carry out a post occupancy evaluation (POE)exercise one year after initial building occupation This is done to gain in‐use performance feedback frombuilding users to inform operational processes including re‐commissioning activities and maintain or improveproductivity health safety and comfort The POE is carried out by an independent third party (see Man 01Project brief and design ndash Relevant definitions) and needs to covera A review of the design intent andconstruction process (review of design procurement construction and handover processes) b Feedback froma wide range of building users including Facilities Management on the design and environmental conditions ofthe building covering i Internal environmental conditions (light noise temperature air quality) ii Controloperation and maintenance iii Facilities and amenities iv Access and layout v Other relevant issues viSustainability performance (energywater consumption performance of any sustainable features ortechnologies eg materials renewable energy rainwater harvesting etc)

75 750 project pepe breeam mat01‐04 email from A Jordan to M Dalley (140415) Mat01 C1‐3 Email provided by the architect constrains a simplified materials spreadsheet (Ref760) which identifies thematerials used within the development76 760 3793‐Materials Mat 01 02 03 and 04 (140415) Mat01 C1‐3 The Materials simplified spreadsheet provided by the architect identifies the Building Category Materialmanufacturer and brand Material Type (Detailed Description) Area (m2) Green Guide Element NumberSpecification References Green Guide rating for the External walls and Roof as per the Industrial requirementsHowever the spreadsheet is incomplete in terms of the Green Guide element number and GG rating for 2materials (architect to update and a bespoke ratings have been requested from the BRE)

77 770 BREEAM_UK_NC_2014_Mat01_Calculator_v00 (2004105) Mat01 C1‐3 The Mat 01 calc tool has been completed based on the spreadsheet provided by the architect see Ref 760 andRef 118 119 120The completed Mat 01 calc tool confirms that the number of elements assessed are 2Total life cycle Grfeen House Gas emissions 31425465 kgCO2 for 100 of the total area of all applicableelements600 Mat 01 points achieved2 Mat 01 standard BREEAM credits1 Mat 01 Innovation credits

78 780 project pepe breeam mat01‐04 email from A Jordan to M Dalley (140415) Mat02 C1 Email provided by A Jordan confirms that the attached mat spreadsheet has originated form the architect andreflects the building spec see Ref 79 for details

79 790 3793‐Materials Mat 01 02 03 and 04 (140415) Mat02 C1 The spreadsheet confirms that the buildings hard landscaping and boundary protection are made up of thefollowingCar ParkBlock paviors heavy duty Marshalls Keyblock = 1040sqm = BPathsBlock paviors heavy duty Marshalls Keyblock = 553sqm = ACar ParkTarmacadam = 6330sqm = ABoundary ProtectionCLD Exampla = 1658sqm = AThe total A or A+ rated area = 89



80 800 project pepe breeam mat01‐04 email from A Jordan to M Dalley (140415) Mat04 C1 2 The email from the architect contains the materials spreadsheet Ref 81081 810 3793‐Materials Mat 01 02 03 and 04 (140415) Mat04 C1 2 The Materials simplified spreadsheet provided by the architect identifies the Building Category Material

manufacturer and brand Material Type (Detailed Description) Area (m2) Green Guide Element Number Areaof Insulation Insulation Thickness Volume of Insulation Thermal Conductivity wmk Specification Referencesand Green Guide rating for all of the architectural insulation within the development The details of thisspreadsheet have been input into the official BRE calc tool ref 800

82 800 BREEAM_UK_NC_2014_Mat04_Calculator_v00 (200415) Mat04 C1 2 The BRE calculator tool has been fully completed by the BREEAM Assessor with the information provided by thedesign team and can confirm that a score of 3 has been achieved and 1 credit have been awarded (Ref 154onwards for further info)

83 830 Project Pepe BREEAM Update from T Rush to M Dalley (170415) Wat01 all The email from the mech engineer identifies the water consuming features within the development andconfirms the Wat 01 calc tool (updated from 2011 to 2014) sanitary fittings flow restrictors and a BREEAMsubmission document (see Ref 84 ‐ 87)

84 840 bristan flow regulators (170415) Wat01 all The manufacturers data sheets identify the flow restrictors utilised on the Bristan flow limiters for both tapsand showers as per those identified in Ref 86085 850 317‐M‐TS‐308 ‐ Sanitaryware (170415) Wat01 all The technical submission from DBS the proposed sanitaryware and fittings sanitaryware schedule positions ofthe proposed sanitaryware and fittings can be found on the mechanical services layout drawings The infocontained have been incorporated into the Wat 01 calc tool

86 860 317‐BREEAM‐WAT 01 Water Consumption (170415) Wat01 all The water consumption document confirms that flow restrictors (Ref840) will be applied on the followingfittings Bristan ECOTAP 4 down to 4lmin Bristan ECOTAP 5 down to 5lmin Bristan ECOTAP 6 down to6lmin

87 870 BREEAM_UK_NC_2014_Wat01_Calculator_v10 (170415) Wat01 all The completed Wat 01 calc tool updated based on the info provided by the Mech engineer confirms that thedevelopment achieves 3 credits (data has been input into the scoring reporting tool)88 880 Project Pepe BREEAM Update (170415) Wat02 all The email from the mech engineer identifies the water meter details in the following references

89 890 317‐BREEAM‐WAT 02 Water Monitoring (170415) Wat02 all BREEAM technical statement regarding meters90 900 317‐M‐004 Rev A ‐ Offices Domestic Services Schematic (170415) Wat02 C1 The schematic confirms that there is a BMS water meter on the incoming supply and the DHW flow

91 910 317‐M‐200 Rev A ‐ Ground Floor Offices Domestic Services (170415) Wat03 C2 The ground floor drawings show the location of the domestic services WC blocks and confirms that solenoidvalves have been incorporated into all toilet blocks and single disabled toilets and controlled via PIR92 920 317‐M‐201 Rev A ‐ First Floor Offices Domestic Services (170415) Wat03 C2 The first floor drawings show the location of the domestic services WC blocks and confirms that solenoidvalves have been incorporated into all toilet blocks and single disabled toilets and controlled via PIR

93 930 317‐M‐202 Rev A ‐ Drivers Domestic Services (170415) Wat03 C2 The Drivers Welfare drawings show the location of the domestic services WC blocks and confirms that solenoidvalves have been incorporated into all toilet blocks and single disabled toilets and controlled via PIR94 940 317‐M‐203 ‐ Warehouse Domestic Services (170415) Wat03 C2 Drawing shows the location of the domestic services WC blocks and solenoid valves

95 950 317‐M‐004 Rev A ‐ Offices Domestic Services Schematic (170415) Wat03 C2 The schematic confirms the location of the domestic services WC blocks and solenoid valves96 960 Project Pepe BREEAM Update from Tom Rush to M Dalley (170415) Wat04 C12 The email from the Mech engineer confirms that there is no irrigation systems are to be installed97 970 4112 Project Pepe Warrington DesOps Rev C (220415) Wat03 C1 The description of BMS Operation for Project Pepe ‐ Warrington Water confirms the Leak Detection systems

will be included on the boundary incoming water meter will be monitored for an abnormally high flow rate Itwill be derived from the boundary water flow meter pulse rate Should the flow rate be greater than the highflow rate setpoint (UA) for a period of 5 minutes (UA) then the alarm will be generated on the BMS system Analarm will also operate (visualaudible) The main water meter will be monitored for an abnormally high flowrate It will be derived from the main water flow meter pulse rate Should the flow rate be greater than the highflow rate setpoint (UA) for a period of 5 minutes (UA) then the alarm will be generated on the BMS system Analarm will also operate (visualaudible) The DHWS water meter will be monitored for an abnormally high flowrate It will be derived from the DHWS water flow meter pulse rate Should the flow rate be greater than thehigh flow rate setpoint (UA) for a period of 5 minutes (UA) then the alarm will be generated on the BMSsystem An alarm will also operate (visualaudible)The boundary incomer flow rate will be compared to the main water flow rate In normal operation the ratesshould be approximately equal If the value differs by 10 (UA) for a period greater than 30 mins (UA) then analarm will be generated on the BMS system An alarm will also operate (visualaudible)The water usage of boundary incoming water meter is compared with the main water meter on a daily basis Ifthere is a discrepancy of more than 10 (UA) between the two meters then an alarm will be generated on theBMS system An alarm will also operate (visualaudible)

98 980 ThePepe ‐ExtractfromContractSumAnalysis(191114)

Man04 C7 8 9 The Contract Sum Analysis sheet confirms that air thermographic testing has been included in the project andbudgeted for99 990 LE 01 Contaminated Land from Jim Robinson to M Dalley (060515) LE01 C2 3 The letter from the principal contractor confirms that the remediation strategy and implementation plan willbe followed as recommended by the contaminated land specialist in order that the site is made safe and freefrom risk



100 1000 LE05 Long term impact on Biodiversity from Jim Robinson to M Dalley (060515) LE05 C2 3 The letter from the principal contractor confirms that a landscape and habitat management plan appropriateto the site will be produced covering at least the first five years after project completion This will be handedover to the building occupants at the point of building handover and will include guidance on bull Managementof any protected features on site bull Management of any new existing or enhanced habitats bull A reference tothe current or future site level or local Biodiversity Action Plan

The management plan will include guidelines for ground maintenance to ensure that ground maintenance staffpursue a maintenance routine that is favourable to any biodiversity on site as this will help facilitate potentialfuture involvement of building users in the management of and engagement with site biodiversity

The letter confirms that they have appointed a Suitably Qualified Ecologist (SQE) prior to commencement ofactivities on site The SQE has confirmed within their report the action required to ensure that all relevant UKand EU legislation relating to the protection and enhancement of ecology at the site is complied with

The letter confirms that they have nominated Andy Clayton as the Biodiversity Champion with the authority toinfluence site activities and ensure that detrimental impacts on site biodiversity are minimised in line with therecommendations of the Suitably Qualified Ecologist

The letter confirms that they will train the site workforce on how to protect site ecology during the projectSpecific training will be carried out for the entire site workforce to ensure they are aware of how to avoiddamaging site ecology during operations on‐site Training will be based on the findings and recommendationsfor protection of ecological features highlighted within a report prepared by a Suitably Qualified Ecologist

The letter confirms that they will record and will continue to record actions taken to protect biodiversity andmonitor their effectiveness throughout key stages of the construction process We will make such recordsavailable where publicly requested

The letter confirms that they have programmed site works to minimise disturbance to wildlife and protect floraandor fauna habitats on site We have produced a clear plan detailing how activities will be timed to avoid anyimpact on site biodiversity in line with the recommendations of the Suitably Qualified Ecologist

101 1010 RE_ Project Pepe BREEAM Update Wat 04 ‐ Outlook Web Access Light from CamillaWinder to M Dalley (070515)

Wat04 C1‐2 The email from the Ecologist who chose the planting regime confirms that statement 1 (External landscapingand planting relies solely on precipitation during all seasons of the year) is most relevant there is norequirement for pro‐active management regarding ecology on the site

102 1020 3793‐125‐05 Fencing Details (300315) Mat02 C1 The drawing identifies the inclusion of 18 M WELD MESH SECURITY FENCE in line with the evidence providedby the architect in Ref 780 amp 790

103 1030 3793‐141‐07 External finishes plan (140415) Mat02 C1 The external finishes drawing identifies the inclusion of 6 types of external hardlandscaping in line with theevidence provided in Ref 790The access or approach roads and designated vehicle manoeuvring areas (Concrete) have been excluded as perthe BREEAM requirements104 1040 RE Project Pepe BREEAM Update ‐ email 1 from Tom Rush to M Dalley (170415) Hea04 C1 The email from the Mech engineer contains the AM11 document identified in Ref 1050

105 1050 AM 11‐Full (170415) Hea04 C1 The full dynamic thermal analysis system used is HEVACOMP Bentley Hevacomp Simulator V8i The documentconfirms that the BEEM software is AM11 compliant and utilises Energy Plus which enables full dynamicsimulation

106 1060 317‐M‐TS‐304 Rev C ‐ VRF amp AC (160415) Hea04 C3 The document confirms that all occupied spaces are in accordance with the criteria set out in CIBSE Guide AEnvironmental Design tables107 1070 RE Project Pepe amp Utopia ‐ Flood Risk Assessment ‐ BREEAM from A Griffin to M

Dalley (110515)Pol03 C3b The email from the flood structural engineer confirm that the design of both Project Pepe and Project Utopia

as well as the wider Omega South site reflects WSPrsquos recommendations in its Flood Risk Assessmentdocuments For example where surface water flooding has been identified as a risk based on the sitersquostopographical form flood control and surface water management techniques (SUDS and overland flowpathways) have been incorporated into the design to manage the risk of flooding associated with this sourceThe design adopts the hierarchy risk‐based approach for managing flood risk within a development as outlinedin section 5 of BS 85332011

108 10804112ProjectPepeWarringtonDesOpsRev D(050515)

Wat03 C1 The updated BMS document confirms in section 4104 Water Leak Detection All water leak detectionsetpoints are user adjustable (UA) to suit the buildings water consumption criteria If any of the water leakalarms are activated then an audiblevisual alarm will be operated to indicate thisWhere applicable the system will account for false alarms created by large water consuming plant such aschillers etcThe boundary incoming water meter will be monitored for an abnormally continuous low or high flow rate Itwill be derived from the boundary water flow meter pulse rate Should the continuous flow rate differ from thecontinuous flow rate setpoint of 10 (UA) for a period of 5 minutes (UA) then an alarm will be generated onthe BMS system Should the flow rate be greater than the high flow rate setpoint (UA) for a period of 5 minutes(UA) then an alarm will be generated on the BMS system Should the flow rate be lower than the low flow ratesetpoint (UA) for a period of 5 minutes (UA) then an alarm will be generated on the BMS system

The main water meter will be monitored for an abnormally continuous low or high flow rate It will be derivedfrom the main water flow meter pulse rateShould the continuous flow rate differ from the continuous flow rate setpoint of 10 (UA) for a period of 5minutes (UA) then an alarm will be generated on the BMS system Should the flow rate be greater than thehigh flow rate setpoint (UA) for a period of 5 minutes (UA) then an alarm will be generated on the BMS systemShould the flow rate be lower than the low flow rate setpoint (UA) for a period of 5 minutes (UA) then an alarmwill be generated on the BMS system

The DHWS water meter will be monitored for an abnormally continuous low or high flow rate It will bederived from the DHWS water flow meter pulse rateShould the continuous flow rate differ from the continuous flow rate setpoint of 10 (UA) for a period of 5minutes (UA) then an alarm will be generated on the BMS system Should the flow rate be greater than thehigh flow rate setpoint (UA) for a period of 5 minutes (UA) then an alarm will be generated on the BMS systemShould the flow rate be lower than the low flow rate setpoint (UA) for a period of 5 minutes (UA) then an alarmwill be generated on the BMS system

The boundary incomer flow rate will be compared to the main water flow rate In normal operation the ratesshould be approximately equal If the value differs by 10 (UA) for a period greater than 30 mins (UA) then analarm will be generated on the BMS system

The water usage of boundary incoming water meter is compared with the main water meter on a daily basis Ifthere is a discrepancy of more than 10 (UA) between the two meters then an alarm will be generated on theBMS system

109 1090 317‐M‐004 Rev A ‐ Offices Domestic Services Schematic (170415) Wat03 C1 The domestic water schematic identifies the inclusion of water meters connected to the BMS as per Ref 1080110 1100 BREEAM PEPE ‐ Hea 02 Air Quality Minimising Sources of External Pollution from C

Collins to M Dalley (190515)Hea02 C6‐7 The letter from the principal contractor confirms a commitment to specify and utilise materials that are in

accordance with the followingAll decorative paints and varnishes have met the requirements of the criteria in Table ‐ 18At least five of the seven remaining product categories listed in Table ‐ 18 meet the testing requirements andemission levels criteria for volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions

111 1110 317‐BREEAM‐WAT02 Rev A ‐ Water Monitoring (210515) Wat02 all The technical submission from DBS includes schematics (Ref1120) BMS operation description and watermeters technical information (Ref 1130)112 1120 317‐M‐005 Rev B ‐ Drivers Domestic Services Schematic (170415) Wat02 C1 The schematic confirms that a BMS Monitored water sub meter has been included on the incoming MCWS inthe dirvers office

113 1130 BOSS New Cold amp Hot Water Meters (Pulsed) (210515) Wat02 C3‐4 The technical sheet identifies the pulsed output water meter114 1140 Project pepe ‐ Hea 04 from Tom Rush to M Dalley (270515) Hea04 C4 The email from BDS the MampE engineer confirms that all room design temperatures are in accordance with

CIBSE Guide A Table 15 and has attached predicted PMV amp PMD based on the design temperatures (see Ref1150)

115 1150 PMV amp PMD (270515) Hea04 C4 The Pepe CBE Thermal Comfort Tool out‐put confirms that the development has a PMV or ‐046 and a PPPD of9

116 1160 3793‐105‐03 Site Setting out sht 4 of 4‐105 (050515) Wst03 C1‐2 The drawing identifies the location of the recycling and refuse area with recyclable waste signage located closeto the main building and accessible to the building occupants



117 1170 3793‐110‐05 Site key plan (080415) Wst03 C1‐2 The site plan identifies the location of the compactor area of around 185m2118 1180 Pepe breeam A Jordan to M Dalley (270515) Mat01 C1 2 3 Email provided by the architect constrains a simplified materials spreadsheet (Ref1190) which identifies the

materials used within the development119 1190 3793‐rev02 Materials Mat 01 02 03 and 04 (270515) Mat01 C1 2 3 The updated simplified materials spreadsheet contains all of the outstanding info except for the Rodeca GG

element number which has been requested from the BRE120 1200 Rodeca Polycarbonate Green Guide rating (290515) Mat01 C1 2 3 BRE Green Guide calculator output for the Bespoke material confirms that Rodeca Polycarbonate cladding has

an A+ rating121 1210 Post occupancy evaluation (180515) Man05 C4 5 The building occupier (Plastic Omnium) commits to carry out a post occupancy evaluation (POE) exercise one

year after initial building occupation This is done to gain in‐use performance feedback from building users toinform operational processes including re‐commissioning activities and maintain or improve productivityhealth safety and comfort The POE is carried out by an independent third party (see Man 01 Project brief anddesign ndash Relevant definitions) and needs to covera A review of the design intent and construction process (review of design procurement construction andhandover processes)b Feedback from a wide range of building users including Facilities Management on the design andenvironmental conditions of the building covering i Internal environmental conditions (light noisetemperature air quality) ii Control operation and maintenance iii Facilities and amenities iv Access andlayout v Other relevant issues vi Sustainability performance (energywater consumption performance of anysustainable features or technologies eg materials renewable energy rainwater harvesting etc)Additionally the building occupier also makes a commitment to carry out the appropriate dissemination ofinformation on the buildingrsquos post occupancy performance This is done to share good practice and lessonslearned and inform changes in user behaviour building operational processes and procedures and systemcontrols

122 1220 169‐01 South Omega ecological assessment FINAL (111013) LE04 The ecology report provided and verified by the SQE was completed prior to any works starting site (2013) Thereport has been superseded transposed into the BREEAM compliant Guidance Note GN13 (Ref 650) Thereport highlights the survey methods provides details of the sites drawings photographic evidence of the siteand ecology the report highlights the proposals for the site and the ecological mitigation strategyThe Ecological Assessment based on survey completed in October 2013 as per (REF65) The report has beenreviewed and verified by Camilla Smith (Suitably Qualified Ecologist) The report confirms in Section 221 thata habitat survey was carried out in June 2013 across the entire site and a Tree Survey was also carried out inSeptember 2013 The report also confirms that a survey for bats was carried out during June 2013 2 visits tothe site one in April and one in June 2013 where undertaken to survey breeding birds 6 pond surveys (greatcrested newt survey) reptile survey was carried out during June 2013

123 1230 project pepe breeam wst01 from A Jordan to M Dalley (030615) Wst03 1C The email provided by the architect has attached the waste estimates for Pepe124 1240 pepe Waste Estimations (030615) Wst03 1C The waste estimates predicted volumes of waste that will arise from dailyweekly operational activities and

occupancy rates125 1250 317‐Breeam HEA 04 Compliance Report Rev C (200715) Hea04 C1 2 3C10 11

The report confirms that dynamic simulation model (DSM) has been created using Hevacomp Design SimulationVE version 2501316 The software is capable of complex dynamic simulation in accordance with CIBSE AM11Building Energy and Environmental Modelling Heat Loss and Heat Gain calculations have been carried oututilising Hevacomp thermal modelling software Design Simulation VE version 2501316 in accordance withCIBSE AM11 Building Energy and Environmental ModellingThe model has been utilized to demonstrate that the building design and services strategy can deliver thermalcomfort levels in occupied spaces in accordance with the criteria set out in CIBSE Guide A Environmental DesignThe modelling demonstrates that the building design and services strategy can deliver thermal comfort levels inoccupied spaces in accordance with the criteria set out in CIBSE Guide A for office type buildingThe building will comply with all requirements in terms of ldquotime out of rangerdquo metric against fully airconditioned building in CIBSE Guide A for office type buildingThe offices are fully Air Conditioned buildings and are awarded 0 TOR as per the BREEAM FAQ relating to thisissueThe report highlights the thermal modelling analysis (above) has informed the temperature control strategy forthe building and itrsquos users and confirms that the strategy for proposed heating cooling system addresseszones within the building and how the building services could efficiently and appropriately heat or cool theseareas and specifically identifies the different requirements for the central core of a building compared with theexternal perimeter adjacent to the windowsThe report confirms that the VRF systems and electrically heated areas have been designed to operateindependently of one another The internal none heated lobby staircase and cleaners type areas have beendeigned to heat and cool based on the ambient temperatures imposed by the surrounding system typesConsequently these areas will be temperature controlled in by proxy In line with the thermal modellinganalysis the heating to areas not provided with VRV units have been provided with electric panel heaters toeither offset room heat losses or provide frost protection as required The Warehouse area of the developmenthas been provided with a warm air heating system distributed from a gas fired AHU via galvanised mild steelductwork within the Warehouse space itself Destratification fans are provided at high level in the Warehouseto aid the distribution of warm air throughout the spaceAdditionally the report confirms that the amount of occupant control required for the development has beendeigned in accordance with the end user (Plastic Omnium) in line with their current facilities and projectedoccupancy type patterns and room functions

The report confirms that the controls have been designed to enable both occupant amp automatic control withthe provision of centralized control It has been determined that manual override for automatic systemsthough not required have been included in a single head up display and accessible to the buildings FM

The offices heating and comfort cooling systems are designed based on a Mitsubishi VRV unit systemIndividual offices are provided with their own VRV units to operate as single zones Larger Open Plan Officeshave been sub‐divided into perimeter and internal zones with at least one fan coil unit serving each zone Anorientation factor has been considered to allow separate zoning across the different office facades as indicatedon the zone drawings below

The VRF systems Warehouse warm air and electrically heated areas have been designed to operateindependently of one another

126 1260 317‐M‐006 Rev C ‐ Gas System Schematic (030615) Ene02 C1‐4 The gas metering schematic confirms that the gas fired DHW generators have been gas sub metered with BMSmonitoringAdditionally the schematic confirms that the gas supply to the Process equipment has been submtered andconnected to the BMs to enable future connectionFinally the gas supply to the warehouse AHU have been separately submetered to enable monitoring ofwarehouse heating

127 1270 317‐M‐TS‐317 ‐ Electric Water Heaters (110515) Ene02 C1‐4 The tech sub confirms that some of the DHW will be provided by electric water heaters however these do notrequire metering as per the BRE FAQ Small point of use water heaters can be excluded from the sub‐metering requirements

128 1280 Project Pepe ‐ Metering from Chris Lee to M Dalley (110615) Wat02 C1‐4 The email from the mech engineer confirms that the OsmosisProcess Water Meter has been included andconnected to the BMS (see Ref 1290)

129 1290 4112 Project Pepe Warrington DesOps Rev E (110615) Wat02 C1‐4 The BMS description document identifies the OsmosisProcess Water Meter has been included and connectedto the BMS

130 1300 317‐E‐001 ‐ Metering Schematic Rev C (120515) Ene02 C1‐4 The schematic confirms that the Pump House and external condensers are submetered to enable monitoring ofpumps and heatingcooling



131 1310 4112 Project Pepe Warrington DesOps Rev F (120615) Ene02 C1‐4 Section 410 identifies that the utility and energy metering is provided by the BMS system A dedicatedmonitoring targeting and display solution is provided (SIPe B‐log) The SIPe system provides live data about theenergy consumption and allows for targeting different areas of the energy network for improvement Thesection continues to describe the exact metering network and various components as per the evidencepreviously provided

132 1320 Hea 02 VOC BREEAM NC 2014 from C Collins to M Dalley (010615) Hea02 C6 7 The letter from the Principal contractor confirms that all decorative paints and varnishes have met therequirements listed in the Table 18 and at least five of the eight remaining product categories listed in Table 18have met the testing requirements and emission levels for Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) emissions againstthe relevant standards identified within this table Where five or less products are specified within the buildingall will meet the requirements in order to achieve this credit

133 1330 Pol 05 Reduction of Noise Pollution from C Collins to M Dalley (200715) Pol05 C1‐5 The letter from the design team will appoint a Suitably Qualified Acoustician (SQA) to carry out a postconstruction noise assessment in compliance with BS 7445 (see standards below) to enable Pepe todemonstrate that noise levels from the proposed building (as measured in the locality of the nearest or mostexposed noise‐sensitive development) results in a difference of no greater than +5dB during the day (0700hrsto 2300hrs) and +3dB at night (2300hrs to 0700hrs) compared to the back‐ground noise level Where the noisesource(s) from the Pepe is greater than the levels outlined above we install sufficient measures to attenuatethe noise at source (in accordance with the recommendations of the SQArsquos report) to a level where it willcomply with the criteria above and BS 82331999 bull BS 74451 Description and measurement of environmentalnoise Part 1 Guide to quantities and procedures British Standards Institute 2003 bull BS 74452 Description andmeasurement of environmental noise Part 2 Guide to the acquisition of data pertinent to land use BritishStandards Institute 1991 bull BS 74453 Description and measurement of environmental noise Part 3 Guide toapplication to noise limits British Standards Institute 1991 bull BS 8233 Sound insulation and noise reduction forbuildings Code of practice British Standards Institute 1999

134 1340 Pol 05 Acoustic Sensative Map (220715) Pol05 C1 The map identifies the location of the proposed development and confirms that there are noise sensativebuildings within 800m of the development

135 1350 317‐M‐008 Rev 0 ‐ MCWS System Schematic (200715) Wat02 C1 2 3 The schematic confirms that a BMS Monitored water meter has been included on the incoming MCWSDistribution to Office Accommodation to Osmosis and to the Drivers Welfare

136 1360 BOSS New Cold amp Hot Water Meters (Pulsed) (130214) Wat02 C1 2 3 The pulsed output water meter provided by Chris Lee Mechanical Design Engineer confirms that the proposedwater meter is compliant

137 1370 pepe mat 01‐04 from A Jordan to M Dalley (310715) Mat02 C1 The email from the architect confirms that the development achieves an area of A amp A+ rated of 80 Theemail contains a revised materials document which confirms that the development achieves the required (see Ref 138)

138 1380 3793‐rev03 Materials Mat 01 02 03 and 04 (310715) Mat02 C1 The spreadsheet confirms that the buildings hard landscaping and boundary protection are made up of thefollowingCar Park Block paviors heavy duty Marshalls Keyblock = 1040sqm = BPaths Block paviors heavy duty Marshalls Keyblock = 553sqm = ACar Park Tarmacadam = 6330sqm = ARoadstone granite Mot Type 1 = 1500 = EGravel 20mm pipe bedding gravel = 1619 = ABoundary Protection CLD Exampla = 1658sqm = AThe total A or A+ rated area = 80

139 1390 317 Mechancial Servcies Drawings (310715) Hea04 C10 11 The technical package provided by MampE engineer contains the heating and cooling layouts and providesevidence of the proposed heating cooling system strategy within the development are in line with thestrategy for proposed heatingcooling system ref 1250

140 1400 RE Project Pepe ‐ Breeam ‐ DBS Response from Tom Rush to M Dalley (030815) Ene02 C1‐4 Email from the MampE Design Manager has been provided to confirm the authenticity of Ref 141



141 1410 141317 Project Pepe ‐ Estimating the annual energy consumption (03015) Ene02 C1‐4 The energy consumption calculations provided by the MampE engineers confirm the kwh consumption per system(a Space heating b Domestic hot water heating c Humidification d Cooling e Ventilation ie fans (major) fPumps g Lighting h Small power i Renewable or low carbon systems (separately) j Controls k Other majorenergy) per fuel type (gas elec oil bio‐mass) and their percentage contribution to fuel type

The calcs highlight in green the fuel type which is over 10 for a given fuel type

142 1420 POE 084 001 31OCT14 LE03 all The Landscape General Arrangement plan identifies the proposed planting and ecology plan for the site


144 1440 Man 05 Aftercare ‐ Aftercare Ex support letter from Ellie Levens to M Dalley(150715)

Man05 6 The letter from the tenant building user (Plastic Omnium) confirms that they will put in place operationalinfrastructure and resources in place to coordinate the following activities at quarterly intervals for the firstthree years of building occupationa Collection of occupant satisfaction energy consumption and water consumption datab Analysis of the data to check the building is performing as expected and make any necessary adjustments tosystems controls or to inform building user behavioursc Setting targets for reducing water and energy consumption and monitor progress towards thesed Feedback any lsquolessons learnedrsquo to the design team and developer for use in future projectse Provision of the actual annual building energy water consumption and occupant satisfaction data to BRE

145 1450 3793‐vulnerabilty drawing (170815) Mat05 C1a The drawing signed and dated by the architect identifies the high pedestrian traffic areas

146 1460 RE_ Pepe_BREEAM_Man 02 ‐ Matthew Dalley from F Dunlop to M Dalley (210815) Man02 C5 The Email from the project manager confirms that the development has a capital cost of pound64806 for thebuilding in pounds per square metre (poundkm2 )

147 1470 169‐01 South Omega ecological assessment FINAL (111013) LE03 C1 2 The ecology report provided and verified by the SQE was completed prior to any works starting site (2013) Thereport has been superseded transposed into the BREEAM compliant Guidance Note GN13 (Ref 630) Thereport highlights the survey methods provides details of the sites drawings photographic evidence of the siteand ecology the report highlights the proposals for the site and the ecological mitigation strategyThe Ecological Assessment based on survey completed in October 2013 as per REF63 The report has beenreviewed and verified by Camilla Smith (Suitably Qualified Ecologist) The report confirms in Section 221 thata habitat survey was carried out in June 2013 across the entire site and a Tree Survey was also carried out inSeptember 2013 The report also confirms that a survey for bats was carried out during June 2013 2 visits tothe site one in April and one in June 2013 where undertaken to survey breeding birds 6 pond surveys (greatcrested newt survey) reptile survey was carried out during June 2013

148 1480 RE Pepe BREEAM from Camilla Winder to M Dalley (130415) LE03 C1 2 The email provides written confirmation that the site survey was undertaken by Camillia however the base ofthe report (Ref 129135) was produced by Andrew Arnott who is the Principal Ecologist at Ecology PracticeThe email confirms that Camillia read and reviewed the report and can confirm that I have found it to1 represent sound industry practice2 report and recommend correctly truthfully and objectively3 be appropriate given the local site conditions and scope of works proposed4 avoid invalid biased and exaggerated statements

149 1490 3793‐vulnerabilty drawing A (190815) Mat05 C12abc The drawing signed and dated by the architect identifies the high pedestrian traffic areas the areas of potentialdamage from internal trolley movement and the areas at risk from external vehicles These vulnerabilities arereflected in the number and type of measures included to minimise the effects of such movements



150 1500 Pepe_Omega Warrington Travel Plan Draft v2 (220714) Tra05 C1 2 3 The Project Pepe travel plan has been developed as part of the feasibility and design stages and has beendeveloped in conjunction with Plastic Omnium the occupier The travel plan includes a package of measures toencourage the use of sustainable modes of transport and movement of people and goods during the buildingsoperation and use The travel plan also contains details of the site specific travel assessment which covers theminimum content and goes significantly beyond it The travel plan identifies a number of physical andmanagement measures including cycle spaces lockers showers and car share schemes

151 1510 WA001 Travel Plan Letter from Ellie Levens to M Dalley (230715) Tra05 C4 The letter from the future occupier confirms that they have been involved in the development of the travelplan and confirm that the travel plan will be implemented post construction and be supported by the buildingrsquosmanagement in operation

152 1520 3793‐110‐05 Site key plan (080415) Tra05 C3 The site plan shows the inclusion of separated car parking disabled parking links to the public realm cyclestorage and specific pedestrian access

153 1530 3793‐135‐01 Typical cyclemotorcycle and smoking shelter‐A1 (100215) Tra05 C3 The drawing shows the location number and type of the proposed cycle storage facilities154 1540 317‐Project Pepe ‐ Thermal Insulation Calculation (050515) Mat04 C1 2 The insulation spreadsheet provided by the MampE team at DBS identifies the type quantity and thermal

conductivity of all building services insulation used within the building The details have been input into the BREofficial calc tool Ref 800

155 1550 KingspanKooltherm (230815) Mat04 C1 2 The technical submission insulation zip contains manufacturers literature and correspondence from Kingspanregarding Kingspan Kooltherm insulation and confirms that the closest Green Guide rating element number915320079 and an A+ rating

156 1560 Trimo Insulation (230815) Mat04 C1 2 The technical submission insulation zip contains manufacturers literature for Trimoterm A12T1 insulation andconfirms that it has a Green Guide rating element number 815320011 and an A rating

157 1570 Insulation Drawings (240815) Mat04 All The drawing zip folder contains drawings of the development and section drawings which identify the locationand type of insulation The domestic services and ventilation layouts correspond to the volumes area andlayouts of buildings services insulation

158 1580 Isover ClimoCover_roll Insulation (230815) Mat04 C1 2 The technical insulation zip contains manufacturers literature confirms that CLIMCOVER Roll Alu1 Strongcorresponds to the BRE Global Green Guide online generic specification lsquoGlass wool insulation ‐ density 32kgmsup3rsquo ref 815320003 which achieves a summary rating of A+ within Domestic Health Industrial CommercialRetail Education

159 1590 CA Insulation (230815) Mat04 C1 2 The technical submission insulation zip contains manufacturers literature for CA insulation and confirms thatthe All CABP roof and wall cladding systems are insulated using Therma‐quilt with a Green Guide ratingelement number 815320001 and an A+ rating

160 1600 project pepe breeam Wst 03 from A Jordan to M Dalley (130815) Wst03 C1 The email from the architect confirms that recycling labels will be included in the development including glasspaper metal etc and confirms that specific bins will be includedThe email also confirms that a dedicated area has been allocated for a future compactor however this is notyet required

161 1610 3793‐Protecting exposed parts of the building from material degradation (220815) Mat05 2 a b c Chetwoods architects have provided a tabulated document which identifies the applicable building elementsincluding Foundation substructure lowest floor retaining walls External walls Roof balconies Glazingwindows skylight External doors Railingsbalusters Staircaseramps and Hard landscaping and has listed thespecific material degradation effects in response to the proposed environmental factor(s) which effect theseelements

162 1620 Design and specification measures in place to limit these degradation effects (240815) Mat05 2a b c Chetwoods have produced a secondary document which confirms the design and specification measures inplace to limit these degradation effects The tabulated document identifies the applicable building elementsincluding Foundation substructure lowest floor retaining walls External walls Roof balconies Glazingwindows skylight External doors Railingsbalusters Staircaseramps and Hard landscaping and has listed thespecific material degradation measures and details of materials (to limit material degradation due toenvironmental factors) in response to the proposed environmental factor(s) which effect these elements Theedocument corresponds to the proposed specific material degradation effects listed in Ref 161 It has beennoted that the materials correspond to those highlighted throughout the Materials section



163 1630 Manufacturers Literature (240815) Mat05 2a b c The manufacturers literature has been provided by the architect to identify the materials and theircorresponding measures to limit material degradation due to environmental factors The literature confirmsthat CA products have a 40 year durability guarantee Rodeca polycarbonate sheets Temp resistant ‐ 40C to115C etc

164 1640 Plastic Omnium‐Environmental Noise Report (200515) Pol05 all The Acoustic report confirms that the nearest noise sanative buildings are housing on the far side of LingleyGreen Avenue more than 500 m to the south The report confirms that the noise impact assessment has beencarried out in compliance with BS 7445 and the following noise levels determinedThe existing background noise levels at the nearest or most exposed noise‐sensitive development to theproposed development The lowest background noise level recorded was 39 dBThe rating noise level resulting from the new noise source cumulative specific noise levels of 38 and 32 dB at240 m and 530 m distances respectivelyThe assessment based on worst case scenario of higher source noise levels and ignoring atmosphericabsorption shows that the combined noise from activities within the proposed new building is calculated to be2 dB above and 5 dB below the measured background noise levels at the receptors 240 m and 530 m distancerespectively As a result this is a clear lsquoindication of the specific sound source having a low impactrsquo hence it isclear that typical injection moulding and painting activities within the proposed new building will not cause anadverse impact As a result no mitigation is necessaryThe report confirms in Section 11 Conclusion that no mitigation is necessary

165 1650 Re Acoustic engineer certificates of competency from Dr Sogoo to M Dalley (240815) Pol05 all The Acoustician Dr H S Sagoo has provided an email clarifying that his report (Ref164) sound survey and theassessment meets the requirements of the standards you mentioned as followsBS 74451 Description and measurement of environmental noise Part 1 Guide to quantities and proceduresBritish Standards Institute 2003BS 74452 Description and measurement of environmental noise Part 2 Guide to the acquisition of datapertinent to land use British Standards Institute 1991BS 74453 Description and measurement of environmental noise Part 3 Guide to application to noise limitsBritish Standards Institute 1991

166 1660 Dr Sogoo Certificates (240815) Pol05 all The certificates confirms that Dr Sagoo has a PHD and Degree completed a Sound Research Lab course inEnvironmental Acoustics at the Sound Research Laboratories and in 1996 has completed the Institute ofAcoustics professional Acoustics and Noise Control Diploma and finally Dr Sagoo has been elected a member ofthe Institute of Acoustics Ltd since 1989



167 1670 70012125_Project Pepe_Breeam Acoustics_WSP_150602_ii (150602) Hea05 C1 2 The acoustic report confirms that at the design stage of assessment BREEAM permits the use of calculationsrather than measurement for the determination of the rating noise level provided that the method adopted isdescribed in the report In this case the method used is that provided in BS41422014 At this stage of theproject there is not sufficient information available in order to be able to accurately predict the noise levelsfrom the site Therefore the above criteria will be adopted and as the design progresses WSP will workalongside the wider design team to ensure that the proposals are capable of achieving the criteriaThe report identifies the required minimum sound insulation performance for partitions determined inaccordance with the acoustic privacy requirements of BREEAM credit Hea 05 the performance requirementsacoustically sensitive rooms which would benefit from a level of acoustic privacy For the purposes of thisassessment the following spaces have been considered to be acoustically sensitive 1048774 Training 1048774 Meeting rooms1048774 Cellular offices 1048774 Conference room 1048774 Bubble 1048774 War room

The report identifies proposed acoustic performance construction types to enable the required Indoor ambientnoise levels to comply with the design ranges given in BS 8233 2014 to be achieved The proposed compliantconstruction types have been shown in the mark up drawings in appendix A and provides a typical constructiontypes has been provided in Table 5‐1

The building does not have areas used for speech thus it does not need to comply with the relevantreverberation times criteria In this case the credit available for reverberation can be awarded by default if theabove recommendations are implemented and the building complies with the indoor ambient noise level andsound insulation criteria

Finally the report confirms that the key details of the design are not available at this stage and therefore thisreport is an interim report which outlines the required design standards to be achieved by the developmentThis interim design report will be updated as the design progresses in order to provide the design team withsufficient design information in order to ensure the design is capable of meeting the requirements

168 1680 Nick A CV (240815) Hea05 C1 2 The CV confirms that Nick is an Acoustic Consultant for WSP Acoustics and has over nine yearsrsquo experience inthe monitoring modelling and assessing of both Environmental noise and vibration Architectural Acousticsand In this time experience has been gained across a number of different sectors including healthcareresidential industrial commercial and retail Nick holds an Acoustics amp Noise Control Post Graduate Diplomafrom Salford University The CV identifies a number of activities jobs and assessments that proves his relevantexperience and expertise in the field of acoustics including noise assessment with computer modelling andseveral bespoke noise control measures The CV also confirms that Nick is a member of Member of theInstituteof Acoustics MIOA

169 1690 RE Pepe ‐ BREEAM from Nick Adamson to M Dalley (240815) Hea05 C1 2 The email from the acoustician confirms the noise survey and assessment complies with BS7445 (1‐3)

170 1700 Pepe ‐ BREEAM ‐ Acoustics from J Robinson to M Dalley (190515) Hea05 C1 2 The email from the main contractor confirms that they will achieve the required levels utilising the constructiontechniques and partition types as per the report

171 1710 Members Search _ The Association of Noise Consultants (240815) Hea05 C1 2 The Association of Noise Consultants (ANC) Registration Scheme website confirms that WSP is registered withANC as a compliant test body

172 1720 Mat 01 Drawings (240815) Mat01 all The drawings and sections provide details of the proposed construction which match the evidence provided bythe design team

173 1730 169‐01 Omega South Ecological Protection Plan (211214) LE05 C3 The ecological protection plan provided by the ecologist confirms when works son site should take place tominimise impacts on sites ecology including tree felling window between September and November hedgerowremoval between Sep‐Feb and orchid removal Nov‐Feb

174 1740 Project Pepe ‐ contract programme ‐(191114) LE05 C3 The Contractor programme confirms that all site works including clearanceearthworks will begin on the 17thNovember Orchid translocation 19th November in line with the Ecological protection plan

175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200

Insert further rows if required


BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Assessment Report Version Control

Version Release Date Description of changesadditions made to the BREEAM Assessment Scoring and Reporting ToolCurrent Version

700 05052015

Hea 02 ‐ Made credits independentHea 02 ‐ Exemplary lever criteria is made not available when VOC emission levels (product) criteria are not metEne 01 ‐ Slightly amended calculation when SAP is selectedEne 04 ‐ The issue is made applicable for industrial buildings with no office areas where Hea 04 issue is not applicableTra 03 ‐ Amended drop down list for cyclist facilities providedPol 02 ‐ The available contribution to overall score was not correct when Industrial building type was selected It has been fixedWat 01 ‐ Exemplary level criteria is made available for Shell and core projects

Previous Versions

600 20022015

Unprotected Assessment References tabAdded the current issue number of the BREEAM UK 2014 technical manual to the drop down listMan 05 ‐ Fixed error with the Total BREEAM credits achieved calculationMan 05 ‐ Assessors box note has been unlockedHea 01 ‐ Removed NA from Internal and external lighting levels zoning and controls credits when Shell only and Shell and Core typeis selected Added a note that clarifies that for Shell only and Shell and Core only criteria 10 and 13 External lighting applyEne 01 ‐ Amended mistake for the calculation of the minimum standard for buildings modelled using SAP and SBEM When the creditsachieved for SBEM were 5 the minimum standard was shown as not achievedEne 01 ‐ Amended units of measurementsEne 07 ‐ Amended the number of credits available when the laboratory area accounts for less than ldquo10 of buildings Gross InternalFloor AreardquoWat 01 ‐ Amended phrase Building compliant with Wat 01 criteria 7 to Building compliant with Wat 01 criterion 6 when Healthcareor Prison buildings are selected in the Assessment detals tabPol 02 ‐ Fixed error with water heating NOx applicabilityPol 02 ‐ Fixed error where the credits were awarded by default when cells were emptyInnovation ‐ The Innovation table was not awarding the credit correctly and some issues were not filtered out where shell only or shelland core project type were selected The table has been amended

500 07112014 Fixed error with calculating Health amp Wellbeing section in Assessment Rating amp KPIs tab when Hea04 is NA

400 10102014

Hea01 Internal lighting zoning and occupant control credit made NA for shell only and shell and core projectsRemoved VOCs credits dependance on first Hea02 credit (Indoor air quality plan)Fixed error with Ene01 calculation for non‐domestic buildings in ScotlandFixed scoring for Ene08 and Wst02Improved user functionality of Assessment References tab allowing cells to be formatted and rows to be inserted and deleted

300 11082014

Fixed error with the applicability of Ene07 Hea03 and Ene09Fixed error with the awarding of the credit in Wat04Fixed error in Assessment rating tab incorrectly calculating credits awarded for issue Wst05Included dependancy in awarding credits in Man01 and Ene04Fixed conditional formatting for Ene08

200 11072014

Bugs in calculating BREEAM rating and minimum standards fixedWeightings for Shell and Core project type fixedImproved item regarding unregulated water systems in Assessment Details tabEne01 calculator updated Now includes translators for domestic buildings in Scotland and Northern IrelandIncluded space to report on KPIs for Hea 04 and Ene 01Mat03 data entry requirements updatedFixed various bugs regarding calculations applicability and conditional formatting issues (particularly for shell and core projects) forassessment issues Man02 Man04 Man05 Hea02 Hea03 Hea05 Ene02 Ene07 Wat02 Wat03 Mat03 Mat05 Wst01 Wst05 Pol01Pol02 and Pol05Other minor formatting changes made

100 29052014Bugs fixed with the Ene01 calculator which resulted in error when calculating the number of BREEAM credits achieved and Ene09

000 27052014 New Release New Construction 2014


Description of changesadditions made to the BREEAM Assessment Scoring and Reporting Tool



Fixed error with calculating Health amp Wellbeing section in Assessment Rating amp KPIs tab when Hea04 is NA




Bugs fixed with the Ene01 calculator which resulted in error when calculating the number of BREEAM credits achieved and Ene09

New Release New Construction 2014


BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Assessment Report Rating amp Key Performance Indicators

Overall Building Performance


BREEAM rating Very Good

Total Score 5507

Min standards level achieved Excellent level

Building Performance by Environment Section

Environmental SectionNo creditsavailable

No creditsAchieved

creditsachieved

SectionWeighting Section Score

Management 21 14 6667 1200 800

Health amp Wellbeing 17 8 4706 1500 706

Energy 23 11 4783 1500 717

Transport 9 3 3333 900 300

Water 9 7 7778 700 544

Materials 10 5 5000 1350 675

Waste 8 5 6250 850 531

Land Use amp Ecology 10 7 7000 1000 700

Pollution 12 4 3333 1000 333

Innovation 10 2 2000 NA 2

Management Health ampWellbeing

Energy Transport Water Materials Waste Land Use ampEcology

Pollution Innovation

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Section score available Section score achieved































Thermal comfort



Indoor Air Quality
























MANAGEMENT

















































Man 05 Aftercare


































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014












































Thermal comfort



Indoor Air Quality
























MANAGEMENT

















































Man 05 Aftercare


































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014




















MANAGEMENT

















































Man 05 Aftercare


































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014


















MANAGEMENT

















































Man 05 Aftercare


































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014



















































Man 05 Aftercare


































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014












































Man 05 Aftercare


































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014
























Man 05 Aftercare


































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014























Man 05 Aftercare


































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014










































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014







































































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014























































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014

















































ENERGY



Ene 01 Calculator






























































































TRANSPORT





































Tra 05 Travel Plan







WATER











Please select





























MATERIALS









relevant to m2





























Mat 04 Insulation




















WASTE
















































Credit not targeted



















































POLLUTION




































Credit not targetd









INNOVATION

Inn 01 Innovation



































































Hea01 C7 8 910 12

































































































































































































175176



177178179180181182183184185186187188189190191192193194195196197198199200





700 05052015


Previous Versions

600 20022015



400 10102014


300 11082014


200 11072014














Documents

BREEAM UK New Construction 2014 Assessment Report