Upload
deirdre-pitts
View
233
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
BOTSWANA FANRPAN NODE:
National Workshop for Node Revitalisation
24 August 2007, Gaborone, Botswana THE NEED FOR NETWORKING AT
NATIONAL LEVEL
Lindiwe Majele Sibanda [email protected]
Outline of Presentation
FANRPAN Mandate-Constitution Challenges Facing Southern Africa The Need for Networks FANRPAN 1997-2007 FANRPAN 2007-2015 The FANRPAN Node Acknowledgements
To promote appropriate agricultural and natural resources policy in order to reduce poverty, increase food security and enhance sustainable agricultural development in the SADC region.
Focus: Improving policy research, analysis and formulation on key SADC priority
themes Developing human and institutional capacity for coordinated policy
dialogue among all stakeholders Improving policy decision making by enhancing the generation,
exchange and use of policy-related information
Members: Farmers, Government, Researchers, Private sector in 12 southern African countries
FANRPAN created in 1997, registered in 2002
Development Targets
Continental Commitments MDGs –vision 2015
NEPAD CAADP- 6% annual growth and 10% national budget for agriculture
Regional Economic Communities Activated
SADC timetable -Free Trade Area-2008, Customs Union- 2010 Common Market by 2015
COMESA’s Agricultural Plan
2006, Abuja Declaration from 8 to 50kg fertilizer/ha
Players in the Business of Policy Analysis-
SUPPLIER- ECONOMISTS / SOCIO-ECONOMISTS?????
CLIENT-Policy Maker, Connector, Farmer????
WHO USES YOUR PRODUCTS?
WHAT ARE YOU DOING ABOUT CUSTOMER CARE?
Stakeholders in Policy-Making
Stakeholders are “those who must be satisfied with the policies or those who gain or lose something from a given policy”.
Policy makers Legal professionals and politicians, farmer
organizations Researchers, technicians, policy analysts and media,
professionals, agri-business Activist groups , Ordinary citizens People with experience, influence and expertise
Monitoring and Evaluation
Agenda Setting
DecisionMaking
Policy Implementation
Policy Formulation
Policy Processes
Civil Society
DonorsCabinet
Parliament
Ministries
Private Sector
Source: John Young, Networking for impact. Experience from CTA supported regional agricultural policy networks, 2007
Evidence
Experience & Expertise
Judgement
Resources
Values and Policy
Context
Habits & Tradition
Lobbyists & Pressure Groups
Pragmatics & Contingencies
Networks influencing policy making
Source: Phil Davies Impact to Insight Meeting, ODI, 2005
Southern Africa- is a challenging environment
The dual mandate-poverty reduction and economic growth
Dual economy- smallholder and large scale farmers
Weak Private sector (farmers and agribusiness)
Suspicion and antagonism between the state and non state actors
Disparity in economic status between countries
Trade liberalization and social protection
Unsustainable use and inequitable access to natural resources
Southern African Research and Networking Environment Renewed opportunities for strengthening agricultural policy formation
African Economic Research Consortium (AERC) Southern Africa Trade Policy Research Network (SATPRN) Southern Africa Regional Poverty Network (SARPN) Famine Early Warning Systems Network (FEWSNET) The Regional Strategic Analysis and Knowledge Support Systems (Re-
SAKSS) Regional networks on natural resources conservation and commodities:
Southern Africa Root Crops Research Network (SARRNET) and the Soil Fertility Network, WATERNET
FANRPAN-2002 African Association of Agricultural Economists-2004 SADC-MAPP (2007)
The translation of academic research into policy analysis, recommendations leading to adoption is a critical weakness
Various stakeholders want to contribute to this process- the HOW is a challenge
The need for capacity building is mandatory and not an option:
Strengthening the DEMAND SIDE & SUPPLY SIDE
Challenges/Gaps in policy processes
The niche for FANRPAN
Linking the Policy SUPPLY to the DEMAND side (business unusual-as backgrounds are diverse)
Partnerships for stakeholders on a journey-avoid extractive engagements
FANRPAN- an all inclusive dialogue platform that brings government, policy analysts, farmers and private sector to work together in policy development
Regional Approach allows learning between countries
FANRPAN 2007-2015 Strategic Plan
VISION A food secure southern Africa free from hunger and poverty
MISSION WHAT-To promote evidence based policy development in the
Food Agriculture and Natural Resources sector
HOW facilitating linkages and partnerships between government and
civil society building the capacity for policy analysis and policy dialogue in
southern Africa
Institutionalizing FANRPAN as a Recognized Source of Research-Based Policy Analysis for Agriculture and Natural Resources in Southern Africa
Strengths Access to policy makers (Ministers, Permanent Secretaries in key
policy-making ministries, and parliamentarians)
Network of researchers (universities, government and private sector analysts)--can mobilize research teams for regional projects
Strong links to advocacy NGOs at national and regional levels
Links to regional and sub-regional institutions--SADC, COMESA, FARA, NEPAD
International linkages--CGIAR centers, Universities USA and Europe and Networks in other Regions, donors
FANRPAN's Policy Research
Position the Network to be a recognized and pre-eminent supplier of evidence to support to agricultural policy change processes in southern Africa
The success of FANRPAN depends on the quality of its technical analysis
The quality depends on the strength of the national nodes, capacity building programmes, and partnerships
Partnership agreements 17 partnership agreement with some 17 regional and international organisations comprising of CGIARs, Universities Regional economic communities and private sector
FANRPAN Strategic Thrust 2007-2015
Capacity Building
Policy Research
Voice
Policy Dialogues-Voice strategy
POLICY DIALOGUES dissemination of relevant policy information and soliciting inputs from stakeholders
Policy Dialogues incorporate new actors an innovative systems approach that promotes interactions between research, knowledge use and policy development; civil society playing a pivotal role as a connector
Regional Dialogues attract senior policy makers
National Dialogues hosted by CSOs
FANRPAN Strategic OBJECTIVES 2007-15 Promoting regional economic integration
CAADP Pillars 1, 2, 3, 4
Positioning southern Africa for a competitive international trade environment - CAADP Pillar 2
Creating a conducive agricultural policy environment for reducing poverty and vulnerability - CAADP Pillar 3
Promoting Technology adoption, innovation and adaptation - CAADP Pillar 4
FANRPAN Programming Areas & Level of Engagement
Programming Areas1. Food Systems
2. Agricultural Systems
3. Natural Resources and Environment
Engagement in Full Policy Cycle
from collection and generation of data and information, analysis, dialogue, implementation,
monitoring and evaluation of outcomes.
FANRPAN ORGANOGRAM 2007-2015
Members- Country Nodes Board of Governors Regional secretariat Programme Staff Project Staff
CEO
Voice Director Policy Advocacy Director
Administrator
Finance Officer
Programme Administrator
Programme Assistant
Director
Food Systems
Director
Agricultural Systems
Director
Natural Resources
Programme Assistant
Programme Assistant
Programme Assistant
12 FANRPAN Country Nodes
Angola; Botswana; Lesotho; Malawi; Mauritius; Mozambique; Namibia; South Africa; Swaziland; Tanzania; Zambia; Zimbabwe
GECAFS Biosafety
HIV & AIDS
Water Land
FANRPAN Board of Governors
SADC; COMESA; Government; Farmer Organization; Private Sector; Policy Analyst
Secretariat
Programme Staff
Project Staff
What does it take to achieve Development Targets
1. RETOOLING- for RELEVANCE Capacitating specific stakeholder groups to influence policies (economic analysis, policy analysis, policy advisors and policy advocates)
2. SMART PARTNERSHIPS – for Capacity building and linking the message to the messengers – understanding role existing institutions, crafting new ones
3. Strengthening Voice platforms- ride on African oral culture
4. Africans setting national development targets linked to MGDs and CAADP
5. Monitoring and communicating the Impact of what we do
Critical role of nodes
Maintain database of Stakeholders-networks are about people
Strong coordinating institution/platform Active in maintaining interface between policy
supply and policy demand Coordinating Research and dialogue activities Lead Policy dialogues-leading to policy advice
THANK YOU
FANRPAN is most grateful to:
DR H SIGWELEFormer CEO, developed FANRPAN constitution and Strategic plan (2002-7)
PROF I Mazonde and Mr MacalaUniversity of Botswana and Ministry of AgricultureVolunteered time as node coordinators
Dr R TshekoConsultant for Node revitalisation
Funding for this meeting provided by DFID and USAID
FANRPAN Website: www.fanrpan.org
DFID Department for International
Development