Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    1/99

    Methodology for a NewMicroeconomicsThe Critical Foundations

    LAWRENCE A. BOLAND

    Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

    Lawrence A. Boland, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1998

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    2/99

    To my students from Milwaukee to Lawrence A. Boland, 1986, 1987, 1993, 1998Vancouver who question and criticize when

    First published by Allen and Unwin, Inc. 1986.

    they cannot understand.The 1993 version was reset and reprinted at Simon Fraser University. Thiselectronics version was published 1998.All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted orreproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic,mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafterinvented, including photcopying and recording, or in anyinformation storage or retrieval system, without permission inwriting from the author.

    Publication data for 1986 and 1987 editions:

    British Library Cataloguing in Publication DataBoland, Lawrence A.

    Methodology for a new microeconomics: the critical foundations.1. Microeconomics

    I. Title338.5 HB 172

    ISBN 0-04-330407-9 (paperback)ISBN 0-04-330351-X (hardcover)

    Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication DataBoland, Lawrence A.

    Methodology for a new microeconomics. Bibliography: p.Includes index.1. Microeconomics. I. Title1985 HB172.B545 338.5 85-6085

    ISBN 0-04-330351-X (hardcover)

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    3/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    4/99

    Lawrence A. Boland

    Acknowledgements

    I wish to thank Tereasa Chudy, Shyam Kamath, Donna Wilson, IreneGordon, David Hammes, Chris Jensen, Judy Alexander, GeoffreyNewman and Zane Spindler for the many criticisms and suggestionsoffered after reading the first draft. I also appreciate the learnedassistance provided by John Heaney, Ken Collins and Terry Heaps withregard to chapters 5 and 6. Students in my undergraduate

    microeconomic theory seminar deserve special praise for their criticismsof my presentations of the ideas in this book.

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    5/99

    Lawrence A. Boland

    Preface

    Secondary roads are preferred.... It was some years agothat [we] first began to catch on these roads.... [T]heseroads are truly different from the main ones. The wholepace of life and personality of the people who live alongthem are different. Theyre not going anywhere. Theyrenot too busy to be courteous. The hereness and nowness of things is something they know all about. Its the others,the ones who moved to the cities years ago and their lostoffspring, who have all but forgotten it. The discovery wasa real find.

    Ive wondered why it took us so long to catch on. Wesaw it and yet we didnt see it. Or rather we were trainednot to see it. Conned, perhaps, into thinking that the realaction was metropolitan and all this was just boringhinterland. It was a puzzling thing. The truth knocks onthe door and you say, Go away, Im looking for the truth,and so it goes away. Puzzling.

    Robert Pirsig [1974, pp. 45]

    Over the last twenty-five years an ever widening gap has appearedbetween what we teach economics undergraduates and what we expectgraduate students to understand. The gap is due entirely to our graduatetheory classes since the microeconomics we teach our undergraduateshas not changed significantly from what we taught in the late 1940s.Today the gap between what we teach at these two levels is such that itamounts to a contradiction.

    Graduate microeconomic theory is considered a new microeco-nomics. Graduate students are supposed to be concerned with thedisequilibrium foundations of equilibrium economics rather than withthe static descriptions of a market where demand equals supply. The oldmicroeconomics that we teach undergraduates is concerned with only asimple appreciation of the virtues of a world governed by a marketsystem that is, an appreciation that if everyone were guided by marketdetermined prices and were satisfied by making their decisionsindependently, we would have an equilibrium which is the best of all

    possible worlds. While graduate students are supposed to understanddisequilibrium economics, undergraduate students are supposed to be

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    6/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    7/99

    Lawrence A. Boland

    Introduction

    ON THE FOUNDATIONS OF COMPARATIVE STATICS

    We have now to examine the general relations of demandand supply; especially those which are connected with thatadjustment of price, by which they are maintained inequilibrium. This term is in common use and may beused for the present without special explanation. But thereare many difficulties connected with it, which can only behandled gradually.

    Alfred Marshall [1920/64, p. 269]

    It may seem discouraging that brilliant mathematicaleconomists are able to prove little more than they assumein this area, but there may be a methodological problemthat inhibits progress. No sooner is a mathematician letloose on non-market-clearing problems than he attemptsto prove the existence of a static equilibrium in which

    there is no incentive for an agent to change prices.Perhaps the fixation on equilibrium is a crucial handicap.Robert J. Gordon [1981, p. 514]

    One sometimes has the impression that there are only twogroups of economists: those who do not understand adifference equation; and those who understand nothingelse.

    Joseph Schumpeter [1954, p. 1168]

    This book is a methodological examination of neoclassical economictheory. It is primarily concerned with one fundamental analytical tool of neoclassical economics namely, the idea of an economy being in acomplete state of equilibrium. There seems to be widespread agreementthat what is taught in traditional textbooks about equilibrium falls farshort of providing an adequate methodological foundation for itsunquestioned use as a basis for explaining the behavior of individualconsumers and producers. Recent efforts to repair neoclassicalequilibrium models have unfortunately been directed at identifying ad

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    8/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    9/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    10/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    11/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    12/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    13/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    14/99

    Lawrence A. Boland

    1The State of Equilibrium as anOptimum

    It has long been held on philosophical grounds that productmust be a homogeneous function of the first order of allthe variables, and that if this is not so, it must be eitherbecause of indivisibility or because not all [inputs] havebeen taken into account. With regard to the first point, it isclear that labeling the absence of homogeneity as due toindivisibility changes nothing and merely affirms by theimplication that indivisibility does exist, the absence of homogeneity.

    With respect to the second point, ... [it] is a scientifi-

    cally meaningless assertion that doubling all [inputs] mustdouble product. ... [T]he statement is meaningless becauseit could never be refuted, in the sense that nohypothetically conceivable experiment could ever con-trovert the principle enunciated. This is so because if product did not double, one could always conclude thatsome factor was scarce.

    I suggest that ... inputs ... be confined to denote mea-surable quantitative economic goods or services. Theproduction function must be associated with a particularinstitution (accounting, decision-making, etc.), and must be

    drawn up as of any unique circumstances pertaining to thisunit....

    So defined, the production function need not be homo-geneous of the first order. If really homogeneous,marginal costs would always be constant. It is indicativeof the lack of integration ... that many writers assume U-shaped [average] cost curves in the same breath withhomogeneity of the production function.

    Paul Samuelson [1947/65, pp. 845]

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    15/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    16/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    17/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    18/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    19/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    20/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    21/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    22/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    23/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    24/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    25/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    26/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    27/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    28/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    29/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    30/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    31/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    32/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    33/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    34/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    35/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    36/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    37/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    38/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    39/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    40/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    41/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    42/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    43/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    44/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    45/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    46/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    47/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    48/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    49/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    50/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    51/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    52/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    53/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    54/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    55/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    56/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    57/99

    Lawrence A. Boland

    errors that could endanger later efforts to put men on the Moon. In otherwords, the first attempt was a mechanical success but a scientific failure.

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    58/99

    wo ds, t e st atte pt was a ec a ca success but a sc e t c a u e.Since disequilibrium is a state where at least one decision-maker is

    making errors, and since some of those errors may be part of a process of learning, it would be grossly misleading to base our understanding of

    7disequilibrium economics on dynamic tools such as optimal controltheory and dynamic programming. While they may be appropriatetechniques for well defined mechanical engineering problems, they arenot obviously relevant for the questions of equilibrium processes where,as Hayek argues, learning from ones errors plays a central role. Equilibrium vs Equilibrium

    Processes

    In modern Austrian economics ... we find the problem of knowledge to be a matter of fundamental concern. In 1937Professor Hayek divided the subject matter of economicsinto the pure logic of choice and the enquiry into thedissemination of knowledge. In 1946, in criticizing mostmodern theories of market forms, he pointed out thatcompetition is a process, not a state of affairs, and that itreflects continuous changes in the pattern of knowledge.

    Ludwig M. Lachmann [1976, p. 55]

    When Professor Hayek, ... in presenting Economics andKnowledge, suggested that the most important task of economics as an empirical science consists in explaininghow men come to acquire knowledge of the datagoverning the markets in which they operate, ... the wholeproblem was stated in equilibrium terms. ... After what hashappened in economics in the last 30 years we are todayinclined to look askance at the whole notion of equilibrium, and even more so at the Hayekian version of 1936 in which we were told It can hardly mean anythingbut that, under certain conditions, the knowledge andintentions of the different members of society are supposedto come more and more into agreement.... But even if wediscard the equilibrium terms in which the problem wasfirst stated, it nevertheless remains. In a stationary world... time will in the long run, hammer logic into brains andteach its human pupils what they must do to achievesuccess and stave off failure. Why this should be so in achanging world is by no means clear.

    Ludwig M. Lachmann [1982, pp. 6356]

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    59/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    60/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    61/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    62/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    63/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    64/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    65/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    66/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    67/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    68/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    69/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    70/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    71/99

    Lawrence A. Boland

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    72/99

    Part IV

    Avenues for a New Microeconomics of Non-equilibria

    Lawrence A. Boland

    9

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    73/99

    9 Ad Hoc Theorizing about PriceDynamics: A Slippery Slope

    [I]t cannot be denied that there is something

    scandalous in the spectacle of so many peoplerefining the analyses of economic states which theygive no reason to suppose will ever, or have ever,come about. It probably is also dangerous.

    Frank H. Hahn [1970, pp. 12]

    Let us now return to where we began, the theoretical problem presentedby Arrow [1959]. In this chapter we wish to apply what we have learnedso far to a critical evaluation of research programs based on Arrows

    theoretical challenge. Recall that he said that our microeconomic theoryexplains an individuals behavior by presuming the individual is a pricetaker while at the same time presuming that the individual facesequilibrium prices. At best, our microeconomic theory is incomplete; atworst, it is a contradiction. If we wish to complete the theory of thebehavior of all individuals who are presumed to be equilibrium-pricetakers, we need to explain the process by which prices are adjusted totheir equilibrium values.

    The most common explanation of price adjustment is based on thetheory of an imperfectly competitive firm. An imperfectly competitive

    firm is thought to be facing a downward sloping demand curve whichrefers to the demand at many prices rather than just one price.Explaining prices using such a firm begs the question of how a firmknows the entire demand curve it faces [see also Clower, 1959]. A feweconomic theorists have interpreted this correctly to be a matter of learning methodology [e.g. Gordon and Hynes, 1970] along the linessuggested by Hayek [1937/48]. Unfortunately, most economic theoristshave viewed Arrows problem as one of deciding what to assume whenbuilding a mathematical model of the market equilibrium [e.g. Hey,1981; Fisher, 1981].

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    74/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    75/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    76/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    77/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    78/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    79/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    80/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    81/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    82/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    83/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    84/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    85/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    86/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    87/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    88/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    89/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    90/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    91/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    92/99

    Lawrence A. BolandNames index

    Alchian, A. 1401, 172 Grandmont, J. 63, 174

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    93/99

    , , , ,Alexander, J. 176 Grossman, H. 6, 174Allen, R. 48, 73, 178 Grossman, S. 174Aristotle 69Arrow, K. 67, 10, 20, 25, 34, 36, 59, 61, Hahn, F. 29, 34, 64, 104, 111, 133, 1367,

    64, 104, 110, 117, 129, 133, 138, 146, 142, 174172 Hanson, N. 123, 174

    Barro, R. 6, 172 Hayek, F. 34, 59, 93, 97107, 11011,Batra, R. 83, 172 11617, 120, 129, 133, 140, 150, 164,Baumol, W. 36, 172 166, 172, 1745Becker, G. 17, 172 Hey, J. 118, 1234, 133, 156, 175

    Bell, D. 172, 174 Hicks, J. 25, 47, 55, 73, 75, 107, 147,Bennassy, J. 63, 172 1501, 155, 175Bhm-Bawerk, E. 32 Hirsch, A. 128, 175Boland, L. xv, xvi, 9, 1617, 19, 223, 59, Hitchcock, A. 118, 175

    745, 119, 123, 1278, 138, 154, 1634, Hollis, M. 38, 175166, 168, 1726, Hoover, K. 128, 175

    Boyer, C. 69, 87, 173 Houthakker, H. 47, 175 Hurwitz, L. 175Caldwell, B. 128, 173 Hynes, A. 7, 110, 117, 120, 133, 139, 174Chetty, V. 125, 173Chipman, J. 76, 78, 83, 1735 Infeld, L. 17, 174Clower, R. 5, 30, 345, 64, 108, 133, 138, Intriligator, M. 99101, 175

    173Coase, R. 32, 34, 146, 173 Kaldor, N. 144, 175 Keynes, J.M. 5, 30, 345, 59, 129, 1445,Devany, A. 40, 173 14752, 1545, 15960, 1667, 1725,Dorfman, R. 99100, 173 177Drazen, A. 63, 145, 173 Kline, M. 69, 87, 175Drze, J. 63, 173 Koopmans, T. 24, 61, 1046, 117, 175 Kristol, I. 172, 174Einstein, A. 17, 174

    Lachmann, L. 1034, 175Fels, R. 128, 1734 Lancaster, K. 33, 143, 175Fisher, F. 39, 57, 64, 93, 956, 104, 107, Latsis, S. 16, 155, 175

    110, 117, 133, 1357, 142, 147, 156, Leamer, E. 125, 175174 Leibniz, G. 6970, 73Frazer, W. 175 Leijonhufvud, A. 144, 175Friedman, B. 122, 174 Lester, R. 59, 1756Friedman, M. 111, 127, 1724, 1767 Lloyd, C. 76, 173, 176Frisch, R. 80, 174 Loasby, B. 146, 176Frydman, R. 123, 174

    Machlup, F. 59, 176Gordon, D. 7, 235, 110, 117, 120, 133, 139, de Marchi, N. 128, 175

    174 Marshall, A. 1, 35, 31, 43, 57, 96, 146, 176Gordon, R. 1, 142, 174 Modigliani, F. 176

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    94/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    95/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    96/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    97/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    98/99

  • 8/13/2019 Boland. Methodology for a New Microeconomics The Critical Foundations.pdf

    99/99