23
Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 1

Maryann PiriePhD candidate

Department of Statistics and School of EnvironmentUniversity of Auckland

Page 2: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

OverviewKey questionData setsDeveloping the methodsConclusions from simulationsApplication to tree-ring

dataset

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 2

Page 3: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

To investigate a possible failure of the uniformitarianism principle in the use of kauri

ring-widths to investigate past climates

Contains rings from the inner of the core, formed when tree was smaller

Contains rings from the outer of cores, formed when tree was larger

3Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo

The key question:

Page 4: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Data

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 4

Page 5: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

MethodsFor a given core we have a series of ring

widths, wijt t = 1, … , T

We may have several cores from the same tree, j = 1, … , Ci – typically Ci = 2

We have many trees, i = 1, … , L

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 5

Page 6: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Method-issue

Assemble series into an array W is an array with elements wijt :

Problem: not all series are the same length

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 6

Page 7: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Method-issue

Tree 1 Tree i

7

wijt = width tree, core, index

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo

Page 8: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Method-issueAssume times Tij are all equal, We have two matrices of time series, X,YWhere X,

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 8

For each time we average

To give:

And, for a similar matrix of time series for Y

Page 9: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Statistical QuestionHow do we formalise

the difference between the two series;

and ? This will be termed the

concordance

These are not stationary series

We do not want to use correlation coefficients

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 9

Page 10: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Method-ideafor the common period m=nProduce bootstrapped

replicates of:

For each time, t sort the averaged bootstrapped time series,

Count the number of bootstrap replicates that overlap at each time, t

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 10

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Picture illustrating bxt, byt and R

Index

valu

e

*

*

*

*

*

*

######

*

*

*

*

*

*

#

#

#

#

#

#

Bxt = 3R = 6

Byt = 6R = 6

Bxt = 5R = 6

Byt = 5R = 6

Page 11: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Concordance, PThe concordance at time, t, can be defined

as:

t lies between 0 and 1The overall concordance of how similar the

two time seriesCombines concordances for all (common)

times.

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 11

Page 12: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Simulated Results – Time series generated from normally distributed white noise

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 12

Average time series for matrix X (black) and Y (red), ~N(0,1)

Time

x.m

aste

r

1860 1880 1900 1920 1940

-0.2

-0.1

0.0

0.1

0.2

Page 13: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 13

5 10 15 20

-0

.4-0

.20

.00

.20

.4

sorted bootstrapped replicated for X (black), and Y (red), for the first 20 series

series index

va

lue

Simulated Results – Time series generated from normally distributed white noise

Page 14: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Simulated Results – Time series generated from normally distributed white noise

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 14

Histogram of prec$x.over.y

prec$x.over.y

Fre

qu

en

cy

0 20 40 60 80 100

02

04

0

Histogram of prec$y.over.x

prec$y.over.x

Fre

qu

en

cy

0 20 40 60 80 100

01

03

0

Page 15: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Simulated Results – Time series generated from normally distributed white noise

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 15

Page 16: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Normally distributed time series - Differences in level

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 16

Page 17: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Normally distributed time series - Difference in scale

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 17

Page 18: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Correlated time series - Differences in level

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 18

Page 19: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Other design issuesSensitivity to sample sizeRagged arrays

Adjust the overlap counts bxt, byt to proportions

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 19

Page 20: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

A case study: Tree ring analysis using kauri from Northern New Zealand

Two subsets: small = 0-20cm from pith, large = 20-200cm from pith

22Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo

Page 21: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Concordance indices

23Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo

Page 22: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

ConclusionConcordance indices are able to identify

periods of similarity/dissimilarity between two matrices of time series

The Concordance tends to zero when there is little or no overlap between matrices of time series

There was a difference detected between the subsets ‘small’ and ‘large’ for Huapai

Suggesting failure of uniformitarianism principle

Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo 25

Page 23: Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo1 Maryann Pirie PhD candidate Department of Statistics and School of Environment University of Auckland

Thank youQuestions/comments

26Biometric Conference 2009, Taupo