32
Lori Hoagland Associate Professor and Soil Microbial Ecologist Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture Purdue University

Biofertilizers and biostimulants · Humus theory: need regular additions of organic matter to the soil to maintain fertility and crop yield Focus shifted in the 1800’s - Carl

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Lori Hoagland

    Associate Professor and Soil Microbial Ecologist

    Department of Horticulture and Landscape Architecture

    Purdue University

  • History in ag. Different types Factors affecting

    efficacy Research trial Considerations

    for use

  • Humus theory: need regular additions of organic matter to the soil to maintain fertility and crop yield

    Focus shifted in the 1800’s - Carl Sprengel (1787-1859), Sir Humphrey Davy (1778-1829), and Justus von Liebig (1803-1873) refuted humus theory and shifted focus to individual chemical elements

    Haber-Bosch process (early 1900’s) -inorganic nitrogen fertilizer

    Aristotle (384-322 BCE)

  • Sir Albert Howard (1873 – 1947) “the father of organic farming”- learned about importance of organic

    matter studying composting in India- “the health of the soil, plant, animal

    and man is one and indivisible”

    Rudolf Steiner (1861-1925)

    Lord Northbourne (1896-1982)

    Lady Eve Balfour (1898-1990)

    Jerome Irving Rodale (1898-1971)

    Masanobu Fukuoka (1913-2008)

    (Brady and Weil, 2002)

    Loss of soil organic matter over time

  • Substance containing living microorganisms which, when applied to seeds, plant surfaces, or soil, colonize the rhizosphere or the interior of the plant and promotes growth by increasing the supply or availability of primary nutrients to the host plant (Vessey, 2003)

    No legal definitions for the term ‘biofertiliser’ in US

  • Replace soil nutrients (i.e. by biological N2 fixation)

    Make nutrients more available to plants (i.e. by solubilization of nutrients)

    Increase plant access to nutrients (i.e. by increasing the volume of soil accessed by the root system)

    (Vacheron et al., 2013)

  • Soil bacteria that fix atmostphere nitrogen once established inside plant roots or stems

    Martinus Beijerinck58 million years ago

    Discovered in 1888

    Inoculants

  • Symbiotic association of the mycelium of a fungus, with roots of certain plants in which the hyphae form a closely woven mass around the rootlets or penetrate the cells of the root

    Fungus root- >90% of all land plants- Wide host range and cosmopolitan

    distribution worldwide 400 million years ago

  • Root-colonizing bacteria that form symbiotic relationships with many plants

    Rhizobacteria with PGP-activity include strains belonging to genera Bacillus, Pseudomonas, Azospirillum, Azotobacter, Alcaligens, Arthobacter, Agrobacterium, Burkholderia, Comamonas, Pantoea, Rhizobium

    (Farag et al., 2013)

  • Crop

    EnvironmentMicrobial inoculum

    CultivarGrowth stage

    Climate conditionsSoil typeCultural practices

    Microbial strain/sPropagule concentrationFormulation

  • • Azospirrilumbrasilience

    • 20 historic and modern wheat varieties

    • Field (2 locations) and greenhouse trials

    • Treated & untreated controls

    • Replicated and randomized trials

    2006-2009

  • Initial results at field site A in year one were impressive -> (10-20% yield and protein gains)

    Yield protein benefits varied by location

    Benefits varied by yearUninoculatedInoculated

    AverageRainfall

    OrganicMatter

    InorganicN

    Location inches (%) (lbs/ac)A 9.8 2.37 18.6B 20.4 3.49 28.7

  • Benefits varied by wheat variety

    In some cases, the inoculant had severe negative effects

    UninoculatedInoculated(Hoagland et al., 2008)

    02468

    101214161820

    Mads

    en

    Xerph

    aElt

    anFin

    ch

    Masa

    mi

    Goldc

    oin Alba

    Hood

    Floren

    ceAli

    cel

    Hatto

    n

    Baue

    rmeis

    ter

    Buch

    anan

    Finley

    WA7

    976

    Fultz

    Thom

    e

    Golde

    nCr

    Delm

    ar

    Turke

    y

    Cultivar

    Incr

    ease

    in y

    ield

    (bu/

    ac)

    **

    * **

    Chart2

    Madsen

    Xerpha

    Eltan

    Finch

    Masami

    Goldcoin

    Alba

    Hood

    Florence

    Alicel

    Hatton

    Bauermeister

    Buchanan

    Finley

    WA7976

    Fultz

    Thome

    GoldenCr

    Delmar

    Turkey

    Cultivar

    Increase in yield (bu/ac)

    4.1646637947

    2.4837200692

    5.6243832417

    6.4650532507

    17.1419169719

    6.0207030657

    14.042345595

    7.4965095533

    2.1360155686

    6.5780777871

    5.3178723252

    17.9019293723

    3.3013145345

    2.6650110679

    16.4156337422

    7.4609437867

    7.2764309037

    9.0407997335

    14.340902716

    4.9044148258

    Sheet1

    Varietydiff

    Madsen4

    Xerpha2

    Eltan6

    Finch6

    Masami17

    Goldcoin6

    Alba14

    Hood7

    Florence2

    Alicel7

    Hatton5

    Bauermeister18

    Buchanan3

    Finley3

    WA797616

    Fultz7

    Thome7

    GoldenCr9

    Delmar14

    Turkey5

    Sheet1

    Cultivar

    Increase in yield (bu/ac)

    Sheet2

    Sheet3

  • Compared 10 commercially available AMF inoculants and lab grown AMF cultures on corn, sorghum, trident maple and sweetbay magnolia

    Results:- most commercial inoculants failed to promote root

    colonization- some inoculants increased plant growth, but more likelydue to non-mycorrhizal ingredients in the products (fertilizers, PGR’s)

    My lab’s experience with commercial AMF inoculants

  • Null Synergism between arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and nitrogen fixation bacteria

    Mycoparassitism of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi by the fungus Trichoderma harzianum(De Jaeger et al., 2010)

    (Bonfante and Anca, 2009) Negative

    Positive (Schütz et al., 2018)

    Mycorrhiza “helper” bacteria

  • Potential opportunity to help supplement fertility needs, particularly in dry environments and soils with low organic matter and high total soil P (Schütz et al., 2018)

    Potential opportunity in greenhouse and vegetable transplants

    Purchase products from reputable companies with independent, replicated research trials

    Purchase fresh inoculants and store them properly

  • Definitions Different types Potential

    mechanisms of action

    Research trials (tomato/pepper)

    Considerations for use

  • First commercial seaweed extracts manufactured 60 years ago (Craigie et al., 2011)

    Schematic representation of effect and mechanisms(s) of activity of seaweed extracts (Sangha et al., 2014)

  • “A material that, when applied to a plant, seed, soil or growing media - in conjunction with established fertilization plans, enhances the

    plant's nutrient use efficiency, or provides other direct or indirect benefits to plant development or stress response.”

    “Products derived from natural or biological sources..”

    Definition in the European Union

    Definition in the United States

    Do not contain nutrients

  • Organic plant biostimulants- Humic substances

    - Protein hydrolysates

    - Seaweed and other plant extracts

    Inorganic plant biostimulants- Silicon

  • A mixture of complex organic compounds having yellow to black color formed by transformations (humification) of organic residues of plants and animals by soil microorganisms

    Humins: not soluble in water at any pH valueHumic acids: not soluble in water under acidic conditions (pH < 2)Fulvic acids: soluble in water under all pH conditions

  • A mixture of organic/inorganic compounds from seaweed biomass using different manufacturing systems such as alkaline or acid hydrolysis or cellular disruption under pressure or fermentation

    Ascophyllum nodosum

    Fucus sp.

    Laminaria digitata

    Ecklonia maxima

    CarbohydratesMineralsPhenolicsAmino acidsVitaminsPhytohormones

  • Leather wastes

    Fish wastes

    Feather wastes

    Plant biomass

    Carbohydrates

    Minerals

    Phenolics

    Mixtures of polypeptides, oligopeptides and amino acids that are manufactured from protein sources using partial chemical and/or enzymatic hydrolysis

  • • Increase germination

    • Improve nutrient uptake

    • Improve nutrient-use efficiency

    • Increase tolerance to and recovery from abiotic stresses (salt, water, heat, heavy metals)

  • (Brown and Saa, 2015 FIPS)

    Plant stresses• Cold• Waterlogging• Drought• Salt• Heavy metals• Heat• Pathogens• Insect pests

    Nutrients, Water Sunlight

    Yield and quality

    Agricultural biologicals

    Genetically determine biomass partitioning

    Yield lossNutrients, Water Sunlight Yield and quality

    Yield loss due to stress

    Yield lossNutrients, Water

    Sunlight Yield and quality

    Yield loss due to stress

  • • Trichoderma species -> two product formulations and untreated control

    • Two tomato varieties

    • Field trial

    • Replicated and randomized trials

    2011

  • Increased tomato transplant size in the greenhouse

    Increased transplant survival and RS+WP1 increased biomass

    * * *

    * indicates significant difference from the control

  • • Trichoderma virensand protein hydrolysate, alone and in combination

    • Untreated control

    • Infected soil

    • Greenhouse trial

    • Replicated and randomized trials

    2017

  • 0

    0.1

    0.2

    0.3

    0.4

    0.5

    0.6

    0.7

    0.8

    control Seed Phdrencg Seet trt,

    bb

    Seed treatment

    Seed trt.+ drenchPHdrenchControl

    g r

    oot

    Pepper root biomass (P

  • Potential opportunity to help plants acquire nutrients in low-quality ordegraded soils Potential opportunity to help plants

    tolerate abiotic and biotic stressPurchase products from reputable

    companies with independent, replicated research trials

  • What are your experiences using biofertilizer and biostimulantproducts?

    Questions?

  • Bonfante, P., Anca, I.A., 2009. Plants, mycorrhizal fungi, and bacteria: a network of interactions. Annual Reviews of Microbiology 63:363-83.

    Craigie, J.S., 2010. Seaweed extract stimuli in plant science and agriculture. Journal of Applied Phycology 23(3): 371-393.

    De Jaeger, N., Declerck, S., and de la Providencia I.E., 2010. Mycoparasitism of arbuscularmycorrhizal fungi: a pathway for the entry of saprotrophic fungi into roots. FEMS Microbial Ecology 73(2):312-22.

    Hoagland, L., Murphy, K., Carpenter-Boggs, L., Jones, S., 2008. Improving nutrient uptake in wheat through cultivar specific interaction with Azospirillum. Second ScientificConference of the International Society for Organic Agricultural Research (ISOFAR), Modena, Italy. pp. 526-565

    Schutz, L., Gatttinger, A., Meier, M., Muller, A., Bolter, T., Mader, P, Mathimaran, N., (2018). Improving crop yield and nutrient use efficiency via biofertilization – A global meta-analysis. Frontiers in Plant Science 2204

    Vessey, 2003. Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as fertilizers. Plant and Soil 255(2): 571-586.

    Biofertilizers and biostimulantsBiofertilizersLong History in agricultureEfforts to recouple fertility and soil healthBiofertilzers todayMechanisms of action RhizobiaMycorrhizal fungirhizobacteriaFactors affecting biofertilizer efficacyN-fixing inoculant trials in wheatresultsResults & conclusionsPerformance of mycorrhizal products marketed for woody landscape plants (Wiseman et al., 2009)Microbial consortiumsConclusions and Important considerations for biofertilizersbiostimulantshistoryBiostimulants todayTypes of productsHumic substancesSeaweed extractsProtein hydrolysatesApplications & Mechanisms of actionSlide Number 25Managing transplant stress in tomatoesSlide Number 27Mitigating Phytophthora capsici stress in pepper ResultsConclusions and important considerations for biostimulantsquestionscitations