10
BioCarbon Fund REDD BioCarbon Fund REDD Projects in Tranche 1 Projects in Tranche 1 February 7, 2008

BioCarbon Fund REDD Projects in Tranche 1 BioCarbon Fund REDD Projects in Tranche 1 February 7, 2008

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

BioCarbon Fund REDD Projects BioCarbon Fund REDD Projects in Tranche 1in Tranche 1

February 7, 2008

Two WindowsTwo Windows

Second Window

Explore “beyond Kyoto”

CDM: Forest management, revegetation, agricultural land management

No carbon credits

First Window

Kyoto-compatible

CDM: Afforestation /Reforestation + Biofuels

Carbon credits to meet Kyoto obligations

The mountainous Pico Bonito National Park hugs the north coast of Honduras near coastal town of La Ceiba, where its buffer zone is the focus of this project

Honduras Pico Bonito Honduras Pico Bonito ProjectProject

Honduras Pico Bonito ProjectHonduras Pico Bonito Project

Reforest/afforest 3153 ha Restore vulnerable landscapes & water catchment areas

through reforestation/afforestation of degraded lands in buffer zone of Pico Bonito National Park, Honduras

Pico Bonito National Park encompasses 265,000 acresPico Bonito National Park encompasses 265,000 acres

Provides vital connectivity to MesoAmerican Biological CorridorProvides vital connectivity to MesoAmerican Biological Corridor

17 upland watersheds and 200 rivers and streams17 upland watersheds and 200 rivers and streams

Home to many threatened and endangered speciesHome to many threatened and endangered species

Park is home to 24,000 people from 82 communitiesPark is home to 24,000 people from 82 communities

Implement small pilot investments at the community level to restore & manage degraded lands

Commercial reforestation for FSC certified timber

Avoided Deforestation ComponentAvoided Deforestation Component

Avoided Deforestation1550 ha Marginal agricultural and clear cutting practices leave landscape

irregularly and disproportionately barren Local deforestation rate of 10% is higher than country’s average rateLocal deforestation rate of 10% is higher than country’s average rate

New imminent threat from encroaching agriculture and deforestation Thin strip of pristine old growth forest (“The Throat”) connects

western section to rest of Park Local landowners threatening to clear-cut forests or sell strategic land located Local landowners threatening to clear-cut forests or sell strategic land located

within this areawithin this area Overlap with Park’s core preservation zone, makes land parcel even more crucial Overlap with Park’s core preservation zone, makes land parcel even more crucial

than the land that is preservedthan the land that is preserved Location of land risks complete destruction if action is not taken quickly!Location of land risks complete destruction if action is not taken quickly!

Roughly 500,000 tCO2e

Location of “The Throat”Location of “The Throat”

Source: Ecologic

Park Division / Elimination Park Division / Elimination of Biological Connectivityof Biological Connectivity

Family is anxious to sell as pending law may question land tenure

Only 600 meters separate family properties, so agricultural frontier could easily advance

Land will be clear-cut or sold to someone who will

San Nicolás Project AreaSan Nicolás Project Area

Colombia San NicolasColombia San Nicolas

Restore abandoned pastures 1,310 ha Establishment of different forestry systems in area

surrounding Medellin – eastern part of Antioquia Silvopastoral systems, agroforestry, and plantations San Nicolas region provides services to 250,000 inhabitants in

9 municipalities Rio Negro supplies drinking water, 33% of country’s electricity,

and water for agriculture Overgrazing and erosion have left only 25% or original area

Maintain and promote remaining forest relics in Valley for Window 2

Avoided deforestation 76,694 tCO2e

Types of Issues to Think AboutTypes of Issues to Think About

National accounting is different from project level accounting

Determining deforestation rate – Honduras Ex Local deforestation rate can be higher than regional or country

rate Valleys and steep slopes in the same project area have very

different deforestation rates

Proving that land would actually have been deforested in the absence of the project

Cost effectiveness of monitoring