Bill & Melinda Gates Initiatives on Partnering for Global Regulatory Pathways Efficiency Vincent Ahonkhai MD, FAAP October 4, 2012 CPTR 2012 Workshop

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • Slide 1
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Initiatives on Partnering for Global Regulatory Pathways Efficiency Vincent Ahonkhai MD, FAAP October 4, 2012 CPTR 2012 Workshop
  • Slide 2
  • Every person deserves the chance to live a healthy, productive life.
  • Slide 3
  • All lives have equal value Our Belief
  • Slide 4
  • How We Make a Difference Focus We focus on traditionally neglected areas that have the greatest potential for impact. Amplify We amplify the effectiveness of proven tools through delivery and distribution. Innovate Where tools do not exist, we invest in innovation and research. Target We target a limited number of long-term priorities and solutions. Complement We strive to complement, not replace, the roles of other players.
  • Slide 5
  • 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | Pre-registration activities Registration Post-marketing activities 5 High level product development pathway Selected critical regulatory activities Reg. by SRA or local NRA WHO prequalification Clinical trial authorization GMP compliance NRA & sponsor interactions / guidance Dossier prep / filing(s) Reg. strategy / pathway selection Safety surveillance / pharmacovigilance Licensure commitment studies (phase 4) Product quality monitoring / anti- counterfeiting Target NRA registration LMIC NRAs need more technical expertise to accelerate these activities We define the regulatory landscape through three categories of activity
  • Slide 6
  • Our focus is to save lives by expanding and providing speedier access to global health products 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 6 Within foundation, provide regulatory service across the Global Health spectrum Prioritize external customer support according to global regional national model Ensure products efficiently and effectively follow the appropriate regulatory pathway with internal GH support but with partners and/or grantees in the lead Currently, PDPs and other partners regulatory capacity and abilities vary widely Develop and license new, low-cost products Prequalify these products Register products in countries of delivery Aid in the development, approval, and delivery of vaccines, drugs and other health technologies which includes decreasing the time required to get product to the populations that need Driven by currently lengthy approval times impacted the delivery of priority products (i.e., licensure, WHO prequalificationn, country registration) Our mission We use two principles as our guide......for performing key activities
  • Slide 7
  • Pre-registration: Global health technology coalition (GHTC) 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 7 A group of more than 30 non-profit organizations working together to educate US policymakers about the need for US government policies to advance the development of new global health products GHTC members strongly believe that an expanded role for the FDA in global health can contribute to accelerated availability of products for NTDs and other diseases of poverty
  • Slide 8
  • Pre-registration: Building resources to support clinical trial authorization 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 8 Objective to build collective knowledge amongst researchers and reviewers......by connecting them through the Global Health Trials website Website developed by a collaboration between many research organizations Focus is on connecting those working on clinical trials in resource limited settings Houses reference and training materials for researchers and reviewers Encourages information sharing between researchers Open access and free
  • Slide 9
  • Pre-registration: History of the African Vaccine Regulatory Forum (AVAREF) 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 9 Jan. '05: Network approach to reg.of clinical trials proposed at NRA workshop organized by WHO 2005/2006: Dev. of model reg. procedures for countries to adapt/ adopt 2005200620072008......2012 2006: Joint reviews of CTAs, joint GCP inspection of phase II trial of Men. A. vaccine using model proc. Sept. '06: Birth of AVAREF (Accra), managed by HQ/AFRO Recognition of the strength of networking by regulators led to the creation of AVAREF in September '06 2007-current: Annual meetings Key activities: Joint Review of RTS,S CTA, GCP inspections Dev. & adoption of ACCTD PACTA Project Est. African Registry PACTR Currently underway: Formalization and expansion of network Secretariat in WHO/AFRO Newsletter & Virtual community Potential to expand scope to incl. medicines
  • Slide 10
  • Botswana Burkina Faso Cameroon Central Africa Republic Ethiopia Kenya Gabon Gambia Ghana Malawi Mali Mozambique Nigeria Rwanda Senegal Sierra Leone South Africa Tanzania Uganda Zambia Zimbabwe Pre-registration: AVAREF member countries
  • Slide 11
  • Kenya 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 11 SRA (e.g., FDA, EMA) WHO PQ NRAs (e.g., East Africa) SRA / LMIC NRA Regional NRA WHO PQ Registration: Current problems and potential solutions LMIC 1 NRA (e.g., India, China) WHO PQ NRAs Cause of Registration DelaysEfforts Underway to Reduce Delays Sequential review processParallel reviews Slow WHO PQ approvalsStrengthen/fund WHO PQ capacity; increase use of Article 58 2 PQ delayed for LMIC NRA productsTechnical assistance/funds to LMIC NRAs (India/China) Numerous NRA approvals required (countries statutory mandate) Regional harmonization (e.g., 1 approval covers 5 countries in East Africa) 1 2 3 4 1 4 3 2 Product Registration Timeline Registration & Product Delivery 1. LMIC (low- and middle-income country) NRAs are those emerging economies that are now playing or will play a major role in low-cost vaccine manufacturing. 2. Article-58 is a new regulatory pathway set up by the EMA and WHO to provide an EMA opinion and simultaneous WHO prequalification for products intended for use in non-European markets (i.e., low-income countries) Today Future OR Article 58 2
  • Slide 12
  • 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | Initial focus Regional registration platforms Common requirements / guidelines / format Joint assessments / inspections Streamlined decision processes Work sharing / pooling of resources Accelerated registration......initially for licensed drugs (generics)...extending to other product categories (NCEs, vaccines, diagnostics/devices) extending to other regulatory functions over time (clinical trials, safety surveillance, etc.) 12 Registration: African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization Collaboration for increased access to safe, effective, quality products AMRH Complements existing regional harmonization efforts (ASEAN, PANDRH, etc.) Is a joint effort formalized in 2009 and launched in East Africa in early 2012 Includes African countries (regulatory authorities) and regional groups (RECs); WHO; NEPAD; Gates Foundation; DFID, World Bank; many others Aims to improve the fragmented system of product registration in Africa by focusing on regions within the continent (e.g., East Africa, West Africa) Proposes to harmonize and streamline the registration process for regulators and manufacturers, leading to increased and timely access to products Creates a platform on which to build African regulatory capacity by region Pilot in East Africa (EAC) Launched March 2012
  • Slide 13
  • 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 13 1. The East African Community (EAC) membership consists of Kenya, Tanzania, Uganda, Rwanda, and Burundi 4. AMRH is the African Medicines Regulatory Harmonization initiative that is backed by the foundation, DFID, the AU, WHO, World Bank, and others. Registration: Pilot approach to harmonized registration Joint review/assessment led to faster registration in East Africa Community (EAC 1 ) AMRH 2 : Regionalized Registration (multiple countries) Products Abacavir (ARV) Amikacin (second-line TB drug) One common product dossier submitted Single joint assessment by team from WHO and NRA Officials from the region (Kenya/Tanz./Uganda) AMRH would speed the introduction of priority drugs and vaccines in all participating African countries ActivityMonths Assessment and PQ decision completed:< 9 Independent country licensure post-PQ: Additional work looks at country risk/benefit (e.g., storage, admin, genetic factors, etc.) 2-6 Total time to PQ/approval in pilot countries:
  • Slide 14
  • 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | Registration: Foundation and WHO partnership is focused on improving prequalification (PQ) 14 Implement recommended reform Uniform policy across all PQ programs vaccines, medicines, devices/diagnostics Increased efficiency (reduced time; more parallel processing) Concrete steps toward self-sustainability Address deficiencies in the diagnostics PQ program Develop international quality standards Improve program management and leadership support Increase efficiency to reduce delays/complexity
  • Slide 15
  • Post-marketing: Safety surveillance working group Developing solutions for post-market monitoring in low resource environments 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 15 Industry Academic experts Regulators/ WHO Other GH organizations Foundation sponsored forum seeking to identify practical, scalable strategies for improving safety surveillance of drugs and vaccines in LMICs 1 Number of GH products entering LMICs expected to increase Historic focus on market entry of products vs. pharmacovigilance Resultant lack of funding mechanisms for safety surveillance 1. LMIC = Low and middle-income countries This newly formed group will be publishing a white paper on safety surveillance strategy in early 2013 Donor organizations
  • Slide 16
  • The importance of successful partnering Case study: Meningitis A vaccine development MVP Core Team Tetanus toxoid Process Development Manufacturing Men A Polysaccharide Conjugation method Target price US$
  • Pharmacovigilance studies conducted before introduction of vaccine to the broader population Solicited advice from WHO Global Advisory Committee on Vaccine Safety Pharmacovigilance studies done in Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger (1.2 million vaccinated in Sept 2010) Single dose in 1 to 29 year olds in catch up vaccination campaigns to rapidly induce herd immunity Burkina Faso, Mali and Niger introductions (Dec 2010) were well received with very high coverage (>90 percent) Pharmacovigilance studies Vaccine introduction
  • Slide 19
  • YearCasesDeathsCFR No. epid. district % Men A % Pneumo 20053,62674620.6111.649.5 200619,1341,6748.73484.69.4 200726,8781,9237.24391.17.1 200810,4011,06710.32079.219.3 20094,72362913.3330.166.7 20106,73294914.11224.947.5 Introduction of MenAfriVac in December 2010 2011 (wk 16) 2,27438917.021.073.5 Table: Meningitis cases, deaths and case fatality ratio with percent distribution of group A meningococcal and pneumococcal isolates: burkina faso, 2005-2011 Data shows dramatic decrease in incidence and fatality
  • Slide 20
  • Early success expected to translate into long-term benefits Dramatic reduction in reported meningitis cases including epidemic districts in 2011 Virtual disappearance of meningitis due to Group A Neisseria meningitidis As a result a higher fraction of pneumococcal CSF isolates Stable fraction of non Group A meningococcal isolates in 2011
  • Slide 21
  • 2011 Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation | 21 Questions?