1
16 Wednesday, May 14 2014 BUSINESS REPORT Opinion & Analysis M ORE than 5 000 power and water professionals from different African utilities and institutions descended on Cape Town yesterday to engage on the challenges that face these two crucial sectors on the continent. Although Africans are quick to dispel the notion that theirs is a dark continent, more than 600 million people are still with- out electricity in sub-Saharan Africa. According to World Bank figures cited by Agnes Dasewicz, the director of USAid’s Private Capital Group for Africa, at the African Utility Week yesterday, businesses on the continent, on average, experience 56 days of power outages a year, translating to a loss of 20 percent of working days yearly. These are not new discussions, they take place every year yet even a country like South Africa, considered to have a more stable grid than most, is able to avert general outages only at the expense of big businesses. As Frans Vreeswijk, the secretary gen- eral and chief executive of the Interna- tional Electrotechnical Commission put it, some countries have enough resources to power the entire continent but they do not have the money to make anything out of those resources, be it rivers for hydro- power plants, gas or solar energy. The planned integrated southern African electrical grid, which is being pi- loted by the region’s power pools, is a note- worthy start but something to take away from Vreeswijk’s remarks yesterday is that we do not need to build big centralised power systems. Isolated small-scale off-grid power generation is gaining momentum around the world. And such systems can be installed in months rather than years. So why is South Africa sceptical of off- grid generation? Ayanda Nakedi, the senior general manager of the renewables business unit at Eskom, spoke about off-grid power that had been rolled out to a few rural commu- nities, but it was not reliable. Its perform- ance showed that it was “electricity for poor people” and people protested against that. They wanted the same quality of power supply provided to people in the urban areas and rightfully deserved that. If there is one thing the engagements at African Utility Week should try to provide a solution to, it is these small areas of con- cern because the bigger problems, bigger power stations and bigger and smarter grids will take years to sort out. Leisure The hotel, gaming and entertainment industry leaders looked a lot like players forming strategies on a chess board. Announcements about who is buying and selling what came trickling down yes- terday from Tsogo Sun, Sun International and Grand Parade Investments (GPI). By the end of the day all three players had made healthy gains on the JSE, led by GPI, whose shares shot up just over 5 per- cent after it sold 70 percent of its GPI Slots business to Sun International. GPI said the opportunity to sell a major- ity stake in a business with 5 000 limited payout machines to Sun International would give GPI Slots a bigger national and international platform. GPI will benefit through the remaining 30 percent stake that it will have in the business. It will also give GPI an opportunity to diversify its capital by deploying the proceeds of the transaction into non- gaming assets. In the other court, Tsogo Sun, which has been making huge investments in the hotel and casino industry, has set a goal to be key player in these sectors. Its strategic move to acquire 40 percent shares in two entities owned jointly by GPI and Sun International does not come as a surprise. The company has recently invested R220 million in the refurbishment and re- launch of the Southern Sun Elangeni and Maharani hotels in Durban. For Sun International, which had earlier planned to cut 1 700 jobs due to muted growth as a result of highly in- debted consumers cutting back on domes- tic travel and gambling, the move is based on a pure strategy. The group’s chief executive Graeme Stephens said the move was consistent with its long-term objectives of increasing inter- est in key strategic assets, streamlining the company’s structure and enabling black empowerment value creation. page 17 Edited by Banele Ginindza. Contributions from Londiwe Buthelezi and Nompumelelo Magwaza. W HAT do you think would be the tenor of global debate if Chinese Presi- dent Xi Jinping, on a tour of South America, were to give speeches at each stop about the threat posed to the region by the US? While visiting Cuba, he would offer promises of “deepening our alliance”. And, at the trip’s end in Mexico, Xi would call that country “freedom’s frontier on this divided peninsula”. Anything of the sort would be greeted by the universal outrage of global com- mentators – and probably by calls for sanc- tions on the part of leading US politicians. But switch China and the US’s places, and this is almost exactly what happened when US President Barack Obama visited Asia late last month. Those words above were his – but directed to the Philip- pines and South Korea, rather than Cuba and Mexico. Indeed, few issues nowadays can avoid being drawn into the ideological sinkhole of Chinese-US competition. But global nervousness goes further than that. In a speech to students in Pennsylvania, Obama recounted that “countries like Germany, China and India – they’re work- ing every day to out-educate our kids so they can out-compete our businesses”. Even the Hollywood press has been abuzz about whether studios are “kow- towing to China” by editing their films in an attempt to enter the lucrative Chinese market. Apart from creating an attitude of fear and mistrust among the next generation of Americans, this kind of narrative pro- motes a dangerous national solipsism. A world where all other countries are either threats or allies and a world that can be either “with us or against us” is an increasingly dangerous place – whether those words are uttered by a sitting Amer- ican president or others. What may be intended as harmless, even cheerful motivation, can be turned, almost accidentally, on its head – and become the spark for a generation’s worth of misunderstanding and mistrust. Hardly the goal of political leadership. Asia’s political leaders have been little better. They are far from acting in a harmo- nious fashion, mired as they are in their own petty squabbles. The new “game” in Asia reads like a football World Cup schedule: Japan versus South Korea, South Korea versus China, China versus Vietnam – and North Korea versus everyone else. Asian leaders should know better. Their populations need them to focus on equi- table and sustainable growth. Instead, far too many politicians seem stuck in the past, brooding over wars that ended 70 years ago. The cliché is that Asian nations have long histories and long memories, which gives them wisdom. But the opposite can just as easily be true. An obsession with a perverse interpretation of history prevents co-operation on the real chal- lenges of the future. Small wonder then that many, both within and without Asia, have clung to the notion, eagerly seized on by the US, that America has to step in and “fix” the region. But this is a dangerous idea. One needs to look only at the Middle East to see what kinds of disasters such thinking can cause. Nor is the seemingly placid state of Europe today something that Asia should aspire to, and not just for the obvious reason that a huge amount of blood was spilt in the interim. What many too often forget is that the reason Europe is so seemingly peaceful is because western European nations have essentially forfeited any notion of an inde- pendent foreign policy. In crisis after crisis, they have listened to the US’s luring calls and become totally subservient. Europe, as many Europeans tacitly recognise, has become a tool in the global exercise of American power. One need only look at a map of US over- seas bases to know who is really calling the shots globally. What is needed is not just an American and a European pivot to Asia, but a Russ- ian pivot to Asia, an African pivot and – most of all – an Asian pivot to Asia. Asia will undoubtedly become the world’s most important region. In the early stages of this century, it will have both the world’s largest economy, China, and its most populous nation, India. The future of such a continent should not be determined by any one group, certainly not the American political class. They stand out because they are simul- taneously the most ill informed about the region – and, curiously, the most prone to believing they alone have a right to shape its history. Co-operation, rather than rivalry, on Asian politics will be in everyone’s best in- terests. Progress on that vital issue cannot – and should not – come from outside. It is short-sighted of China’s neigh- bours to antagonise what will inevitably become the region’s most powerful politi- cal, economic and military force. But it is just as short-sighted of China to promote any vicious form of national- ism as a means to distract from domestic dissatisfaction or challenges. China is here to stay. Constant obsess- ing about regional conflicts, by whichever “camp”, poses the very real danger of be- coming a self-fulfilling prophecy. More than this, the real problems of the 21st century – those to do with scarce re- sources, climate change, rising populations and technological over-reach – need to be solved with the help of the entire world, not by squabbling groups of short-term allies. China, in its well-understood self- interest, should be at the centre of these efforts – possibly even leading them. For this, it will need the consent and co-opera- tion of its neighbours. The latter should not fall victim to the “western” folly of treating it like a pariah, largely because it has a very different but actually quite well-functioning political system. The Chinese, in turn, need to step up to the plate and validate their claims of a “peaceful rise”. They must start to compro- mise. If they do not, they risk living up to frequent accusations of bullying made against them. In the end, only a series of mutually agreed regional rules can prevent a race to the bottom. To the victor the spoils? Any- body who seriously believes that notion, even for a moment, has no idea of the last- ing damage that could be created in the struggle for control of a small group of uninhabited islands. Chandran Nair is the founder of the Global Institute For Tomorrow in Hong Kong. Follow the Globalist on Twitter: @theGlobalist F EW central bankers have had as much success in so short a period as India’s Raghuram Rajan. Eight months ago, when Rajan took over as head of the Reserve Bank of India, the rupee was in a free fall, specula- tors were betting on a debt crisis, and econ- omists buzzed about India being the first Bric (Brazil, Russia, India and China) nation to have its credit rating cut to junk. Today, India’s central bank is back to battling more conventional foes such as inflation, not financial Armageddon, thanks to Rajan’s decisive moves to stop capital from fleeing the economy. But Rajan is about to confront an even bigger challenge: India’s dysfunctional politics. On Friday, India’s 1.2billion peo- ple will get a new government. Elections that began on April 7 are widely expected to deliver Narendra Modi’s Bharatiya Janata Party to power. Markets are rallying amid expectations he will cut red tape, attack corruption, and reduce the crushing poverty that leaves 800 million people living on less than $2 (R21) a day. Since 2001, Modi has served as chief minister of the western state of Gujarat, where growth significantly out- paced the national average in 11 of the past 12 years for which data are available. Voters want Modi to replicate that per- formance across the nation. Yet as Modi will learn early on, enacting change in a region of 60 million people that was famed for entrepreneurship and industriousness well before he came along is one thing; doing it in corrupt, inefficient and ossified New Delhi is another. As the magnitude of the task becomes clear and vested interests dig in, expect Modi to do what so many governments before have done: put pressure on the central bank to boost growth. Rajan should brace for unprecedented criticism that the Reserve Bank is not doing enough to support the nation. He should stand firm against the poli- tics of expediency and focus on establish- ing a foundation for sustainable growth. The most important contribution Rajan can make is getting India’s inflation rate well below the growth rate. Consumer prices rose at a rate of 8.59 percent last month, the fastest pace among the biggest emerging markets. The economy is expanding at barely half that rate: roughly 4.7 percent, near last year’s 4.5 percent, which was the slowest since 2003. That right there explains so many of India’s vulnerabilities. Rajan has raised borrowing costs three times to 8 percent. The moves were partly aimed at stabilising the rupee after it plunged to record lows. But Rajan is also trying to rid the $1.8 trillion economy of the chronic inflation that exacerbates poverty, damages competitiveness and inhibits foreign direct investment. Since taking over as the central bank’s governor in September, Rajan has had reasonably free rein to shore up India’s financial system. With crisis in the air, politicians were all too happy to defer to the central bank. But inevitably, Rajan and his team will find themselves in an uncom- fortable spotlight. Expectations are high for Modi. Businesses and households alike will be looking for fast dividends that will be very hard to deliver. The changes India needs will be noth- ing less than explosive for the country’s leadership. Any moves to root out corrup- tion, make the government more account- able and reduce the barriers to everything from trade to investment will require epic battles with entrenched interests. So will any effort to reduce government debt or narrow the current account deficit. It will not be long before the pre-election hype about Modi taking his “Gujarat model” nationwide meets governing reali- ties, dragging down his approval ratings. The quickest way to calm the masses will be the central bank’s compliance. But Rajan must resist the torrent of criticism sure to come his way. Giving in would not just fan fresh infla- tion – it would also remove the urgency for the government to internationalise an economy that risks getting left behind as China races forward. Rajan has the gravitas to push back. The University of Chicago economist did India proud when he headed up the International Monetary Fund’s (IMF’s) research team from 2003 to 2007. Prominent economists such as Colum- bia University’s Jagdish Bhagwati think Rajan is an obvious choice to replace IMF head Christine Lagarde someday, boosting India’s global clout. For now, though, Rajan faces what may be the toughest job in global economics. Instead of becoming Modi’s monetary lackey, Rajan should speak truth to power the way central bankers in the US and EU did once upon a time. Rajan is just the man to play the honest broker role New Delhi has lacked during the past decade. If he can turn the tables and prod Modi to alter the mechanics of India’s economy, Rajan will be remembered as one of his- tory’s greatest reformers, and the world economy will be a better place. William Pesek is a Bloomberg columnist. India’s central bank head to face fresh challenge as political pressure looms A TAXI driver has become an overnight celebrity in China after he found a huge bundle of cash in the back of his taxi and promptly returned it to its rightful owner. Zhao Lei found 170 000 yuan (R285 000) in a paper bag on the back seat of his taxi after taking a young couple to a car dealership in Harbin, in the north-eastern province of Heilongjiang. Instead of keeping the huge haul – probably three times his annual salary – he handed it to the company he works for. The firm contacted the passen- gers and returned the money. The delighted couple, who said they had been carrying the cash so they could pay for a new car, tried to offer Zhao 10 000 yuan as a reward for his honesty, but he refused to accept the cash. “It is what I have to do,” the driver said after news of his deed came to light. “Anyone who lost such a big amount of money will go crazy. I won’t take advantage of that.” Taxi drivers in China earn less than 5 000 yuan a month for work- ing punishing 14-hour shifts, six days a week. The story of Zhao’s selfless- ness is likely to be held up as an example of community spirit by the Chinese media, in contrast to a wave of stories demonstrating the increasing individualism of society. In 2011, a little girl who was run over by two cars was seen on camera bleeding to death while nearly 20 passers-by simply ignored her plight. – Daily Mail ❚❚ DILBERT ❚❚ DIARY Big players blind to real value of small-scale off-grid power Asia co-operation will do the world a whole lot of good BUSINESS WATCH What is needed is not just an American and a European pivot to Asia, but a Russian pivot to Asia, an African pivot and – most of all – an Asian pivot to Asia. IN MY OPINION Selfless taxi driver keeps Chinese idealism on the road HONEST BROKER William Pesek You can write, fax or e-mail a letter to: The Editor, Business Report, PO Box 1014, Johannesburg 2000 Fax: (011) 838-2693 e-mail: [email protected] Include daytime telephone numbers and full address. Pseudonyms are not acceptable. The editor reserves the right to edit or reject letters DIRECT ENQUIRES TO: JHB NEWSDESK 011 633 2484 You can send feedback, complaints or suggestions to: e-mail: [email protected] ❚❚ CONTACT Chandran Nair ❚❚ QUOTE OF THE DAY Your words have power! They can be tools that build or weapons that destroy… your choice. – Tony Gaskin, American life coach, motivational speaker and author Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, right, and US President Barack Obama. Co-operation between countries, not demonisation, is the way forward, the writer argues. PHOTO: AP

Big players blind to real value of small-scale off-grid powerAfrican electrical grid, which is being pi-loted by the region’s power pools, is a note-worthy start but something to

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    0

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Big players blind to real value of small-scale off-grid powerAfrican electrical grid, which is being pi-loted by the region’s power pools, is a note-worthy start but something to

16 Wednesday, May 14 2014 BUSINESS REPORT

Opinion&Analysis

MORE than 5 000 power andwater professionals fromdifferent African utilitiesand institutions descendedon Cape Town yesterday to

engage on the challenges that face thesetwo crucial sectors on the continent.

Although Africans are quick to dispelthe notion that theirs is a dark continent,more than 600 million people are still with-out electricity in sub-Saharan Africa.

According to World Bank figures cited

by Agnes Dasewicz, the director of USAid’sPrivate Capital Group for Africa, at theAfrican Utility Week yesterday, businesseson the continent, on average, experience 56days of power outages a year, translating toa loss of 20 percent of working days yearly.

These are not new discussions, theytake place every year yet even a countrylike South Africa, considered to have amore stable grid than most, is able to avertgeneral outages only at the expense of bigbusinesses.

As Frans Vreeswijk, the secretary gen-eral and chief executive of the Interna-tional Electrotechnical Commission put it,some countries have enough resources topower the entire continent but they do nothave the money to make anything out ofthose resources, be it rivers for hydro-power plants, gas or solar energy.

The planned integrated southernAfrican electrical grid, which is being pi-loted by the region’s power pools, is a note-worthy start but something to take awayfrom Vreeswijk’s remarks yesterday is thatwe do not need to build big centralisedpower systems. Isolated small-scale off-gridpower generation is gaining momentumaround the world. And such systems can beinstalled in months rather than years.

So why is South Africa sceptical of off-grid generation?

Ayanda Nakedi, the senior generalmanager of the renewables business unitat Eskom, spoke about off-grid power thathad been rolled out to a few rural commu-nities, but it was not reliable. Its perform-ance showed that it was “electricity forpoor people” and people protested againstthat. They wanted the same quality of

power supply provided to people in theurban areas and rightfully deserved that.

If there is one thing the engagements atAfrican Utility Week should try to providea solution to, it is these small areas of con-cern because the bigger problems, biggerpower stations and bigger and smartergrids will take years to sort out.

LeisureThe hotel, gaming and entertainmentindustry leaders looked a lot like playersforming strategies on a chess board.

Announcements about who is buyingand selling what came trickling down yes-terday from Tsogo Sun, Sun Internationaland Grand Parade Investments (GPI).

By the end of the day all three playershad made healthy gains on the JSE, led by

GPI, whose shares shot up just over 5 per-cent after it sold 70 percent of its GPI Slotsbusiness to Sun International.

GPI said the opportunity to sell a major-ity stake in a business with 5 000 limitedpayout machines to Sun Internationalwould give GPI Slots a bigger national andinternational platform. GPI will benefitthrough the remaining 30 percent stakethat it will have in the business.

It will also give GPI an opportunity todiversify its capital by deploying theproceeds of the transaction into non-gaming assets.

In the other court, Tsogo Sun, whichhas been making huge investments in thehotel and casino industry, has set a goal tobe key player in these sectors. Its strategicmove to acquire 40 percent shares in twoentities owned jointly by GPI and Sun

International does not come as a surprise. The company has recently invested

R220 million in the refurbishment and re-launch of the Southern Sun Elangeni andMaharani hotels in Durban.

For Sun International, which hadearlier planned to cut 1 700 jobs due tomuted growth as a result of highly in-debted consumers cutting back on domes-tic travel and gambling, the move is basedon a pure strategy.

The group’s chief executive GraemeStephens said the move was consistent withits long-term objectives of increasing inter-est in key strategic assets, streamlining thecompany’s structure and enabling blackempowerment value creation. page 17

Edited by Banele Ginindza. Contributions fromLondiwe Buthelezi and Nompumelelo Magwaza.

WHAT do you think wouldbe the tenor of globaldebate if Chinese Presi-dent Xi Jinping, on a tourof South America, were to

give speeches at each stop about the threatposed to the region by the US?

While visiting Cuba, he would offerpromises of “deepening our alliance”.And, at the trip’s end in Mexico, Xi wouldcall that country “freedom’s frontier onthis divided peninsula”.

Anything of the sort would be greetedby the universal outrage of global com-mentators – and probably by calls for sanc-tions on the part of leading US politicians.

But switch China and the US’s places,and this is almost exactly what happenedwhen US President Barack Obama visitedAsia late last month. Those words above were his – but directed to the Philip-pines and South Korea, rather than Cubaand Mexico.

Indeed, few issues nowadays can avoidbeing drawn into the ideological sinkholeof Chinese-US competition. But globalnervousness goes further than that.

In a speech to students in Pennsylvania,Obama recounted that “countries likeGermany, China and India – they’re work-ing every day to out-educate our kids sothey can out-compete our businesses”.

Even the Hollywood press has beenabuzz about whether studios are “kow-towing to China” by editing their films in anattempt to enter the lucrative Chinesemarket.

Apart from creating an attitude of fearand mistrust among the next generation ofAmericans, this kind of narrative pro-motes a dangerous national solipsism.

A world where all other countries areeither threats or allies and a world that canbe either “with us or against us” is anincreasingly dangerous place – whetherthose words are uttered by a sitting Amer-ican president or others.

What may be intended as harmless,even cheerful motivation, can be turned,almost accidentally, on its head – andbecome the spark for a generation’s worthof misunderstanding and mistrust. Hardlythe goal of political leadership.

Asia’s political leaders have been littlebetter. They are far from acting in a harmo-nious fashion, mired as they are in theirown petty squabbles.

The new “game” in Asia reads like afootball World Cup schedule: Japan versus

South Korea, South Korea versus China,China versus Vietnam – and North Koreaversus everyone else.

Asian leaders should know better. Theirpopulations need them to focus on equi-table and sustainable growth. Instead, fartoo many politicians seem stuck in thepast, brooding over wars that ended 70years ago.

The cliché is that Asian nations havelong histories and long memories, whichgives them wisdom. But the opposite canjust as easily be true. An obsession with aperverse interpretation of historyprevents co-operation on the real chal-lenges of the future.

Small wonder then that many, bothwithin and without Asia, have clung to thenotion, eagerly seized on by the US, thatAmerica has to step in and “fix” the region.But this is a dangerous idea.

One needs to look only at the MiddleEast to see what kinds of disasters suchthinking can cause.

Nor is the seemingly placid state ofEurope today something that Asia shouldaspire to, and not just for the obviousreason that a huge amount of blood wasspilt in the interim.

What many too often forget is that thereason Europe is so seemingly peaceful isbecause western European nations haveessentially forfeited any notion of an inde-pendent foreign policy. In crisis after crisis,they have listened to the US’s luring callsand become totally subservient.

Europe, as many Europeans tacitlyrecognise, has become a tool in the globalexercise of American power.

One need only look at a map of US over-seas bases to know who is really calling theshots globally.

What is needed is not just an Americanand a European pivot to Asia, but a Russ-ian pivot to Asia, an African pivot and –most of all – an Asian pivot to Asia.

Asia will undoubtedly become theworld’s most important region. In the earlystages of this century, it will have both theworld’s largest economy, China, and itsmost populous nation, India.

The future of such a continent shouldnot be determined by any one group,certainly not the American political class.They stand out because they are simul-taneously the most ill informed about theregion – and, curiously, the most prone tobelieving they alone have a right to shapeits history.

Co-operation, rather than rivalry, onAsian politics will be in everyone’s best in-terests. Progress on that vital issue cannot

– and should not – come from outside.It is short-sighted of China’s neigh-

bours to antagonise what will inevitablybecome the region’s most powerful politi-cal, economic and military force.

But it is just as short-sighted of Chinato promote any vicious form of national-ism as a means to distract from domesticdissatisfaction or challenges.

China is here to stay. Constant obsess-ing about regional conflicts, by whichever“camp”, poses the very real danger of be-coming a self-fulfilling prophecy.

More than this, the real problems of the21st century – those to do with scarce re-sources, climate change, rising populations

and technological over-reach – need to besolved with the help of the entire world, notby squabbling groups of short-term allies.

China, in its well-understood self-interest, should be at the centre of theseefforts – possibly even leading them. Forthis, it will need the consent and co-opera-tion of its neighbours.

The latter should not fall victim to the“western” folly of treating it like a pariah,largely because it has a very different butactually quite well-functioning politicalsystem.

The Chinese, in turn, need to step up tothe plate and validate their claims of a“peaceful rise”. They must start to compro-mise. If they do not, they risk living up tofrequent accusations of bullying madeagainst them.

In the end, only a series of mutuallyagreed regional rules can prevent a race tothe bottom. To the victor the spoils? Any-body who seriously believes that notion,even for a moment, has no idea of the last-ing damage that could be created in thestruggle for control of a small group ofuninhabited islands.

Chandran Nair is the founder of the GlobalInstitute For Tomorrow in Hong Kong. Follow theGlobalist on Twitter: @theGlobalist

FEW central bankers have had asmuch success in so short a periodas India’s Raghuram Rajan. Eightmonths ago, when Rajan took overas head of the Reserve Bank of

India, the rupee was in a free fall, specula-tors were betting on a debt crisis, and econ-omists buzzed about India being the firstBric (Brazil, Russia, India and China)nation to have its credit rating cut to junk.

Today, India’s central bank is back tobattling more conventional foes such asinflation, not financial Armageddon,thanks to Rajan’s decisive moves to stopcapital from fleeing the economy.

But Rajan is about to confront an evenbigger challenge: India’s dysfunctionalpolitics. On Friday, India’s 1.2 billion peo-ple will get a new government. Electionsthat began on April 7 are widely expectedto deliver Narendra Modi’s BharatiyaJanata Party to power.

Markets are rallying amid expectationshe will cut red tape, attack corruption, andreduce the crushing poverty that leaves800 million people living on less than $2(R21) a day. Since 2001, Modi has served aschief minister of the western state ofGujarat, where growth significantly out-paced the national average in 11 of the past12 years for which data are available.

Voters want Modi to replicate that per-formance across the nation. Yet as Modiwill learn early on, enacting change in aregion of 60 million people that was famedfor entrepreneurship and industriousnesswell before he came along is one thing;doing it in corrupt, inefficient and ossifiedNew Delhi is another.

As the magnitude of the task becomesclear and vested interests dig in, expectModi to do what so many governmentsbefore have done: put pressure on thecentral bank to boost growth. Rajan shouldbrace for unprecedented criticism that theReserve Bank is not doing enough tosupport the nation.

He should stand firm against the poli-tics of expediency and focus on establish-ing a foundation for sustainable growth.The most important contribution Rajancan make is getting India’s inflation ratewell below the growth rate.

Consumer prices rose at a rate of8.59 percent last month, the fastest paceamong the biggest emerging markets. Theeconomy is expanding at barely half thatrate: roughly 4.7 percent, near last year’s4.5 percent, which was the slowest since2003. That right there explains so many ofIndia’s vulnerabilities.

Rajan has raised borrowing costs threetimes to 8 percent. The moves were partly

aimed at stabilising the rupee after itplunged to record lows. But Rajan is alsotrying to rid the $1.8 trillion economy ofthe chronic inflation that exacerbatespoverty, damages competitiveness andinhibits foreign direct investment.

Since taking over as the central bank’sgovernor in September, Rajan has hadreasonably free rein to shore up India’sfinancial system. With crisis in the air,politicians were all too happy to defer tothe central bank. But inevitably, Rajan andhis team will find themselves in an uncom-fortable spotlight. Expectations are highfor Modi. Businesses and households alikewill be looking for fast dividends that willbe very hard to deliver.

The changes India needs will be noth-ing less than explosive for the country’sleadership. Any moves to root out corrup-tion, make the government more account-able and reduce the barriers to everythingfrom trade to investment will require epicbattles with entrenched interests.

So will any effort to reduce governmentdebt or narrow the current account deficit.It will not be long before the pre-electionhype about Modi taking his “Gujaratmodel” nationwide meets governing reali-ties, dragging down his approval ratings.The quickest way to calm the masses willbe the central bank’s compliance. ButRajan must resist the torrent of criticismsure to come his way.

Giving in would not just fan fresh infla-tion – it would also remove the urgency forthe government to internationalise aneconomy that risks getting left behind asChina races forward. Rajan has thegravitas to push back.

The University of Chicago economistdid India proud when he headed up theInternational Monetary Fund’s (IMF’s)research team from 2003 to 2007.

Prominent economists such as Colum-bia University’s Jagdish Bhagwati thinkRajan is an obvious choice to replace IMFhead Christine Lagarde someday, boostingIndia’s global clout.

For now, though, Rajan faces what maybe the toughest job in global economics.Instead of becoming Modi’s monetarylackey, Rajan should speak truth to powerthe way central bankers in the US and EUdid once upon a time. Rajan is just the manto play the honest broker role New Delhihas lacked during the past decade.

If he can turn the tables and prod Modito alter the mechanics of India’s economy,Rajan will be remembered as one of his-tory’s greatest reformers, and the worldeconomy will be a better place.

William Pesek is a Bloomberg columnist.

India’s central bank headto face fresh challenge aspolitical pressure looms

A TAXI driver has become anovernight celebrity in China afterhe found a huge bundle of cash inthe back of his taxi and promptlyreturned it to its rightful owner.

Zhao Lei found 170 000 yuan(R285 000) in a paper bag on theback seat of his taxi after takinga young couple to a car dealershipin Harbin, in the north-easternprovince of Heilongjiang.

Instead of keeping the hugehaul – probably three times hisannual salary – he handed it tothe company he works for.

The firm contacted the passen-gers and returned the money.

The delighted couple, who saidthey had been carrying the cashso they could pay for a new car,tried to offer Zhao 10 000 yuan asa reward for his honesty, but herefused to accept the cash.

“It is what I have to do,” thedriver said after news of his deedcame to light.

“Anyone who lost such a bigamount of money will go crazy. Iwon’t take advantage of that.”

Taxi drivers in China earn less

than 5 000 yuan a month for work-ing punishing 14-hour shifts, sixdays a week.

The story of Zhao’s selfless-ness is likely to be held up as anexample of community spirit bythe Chinese media, in contrast toa wave of stories demonstratingthe increasing individualism ofsociety.

In 2011, a little girl who wasrun over by two cars was seen oncamera bleeding to death whilenearly 20 passers-by simplyignored her plight. – Daily Mail

❚❚ DILBERT ❚❚ DIARY

Big players blind to real value of small-scale off-grid power

Asia co-operationwill do the world awhole lot of good

BUSINESS WATCH

What is needed is not just an American and aEuropean pivot to Asia,buta Russian pivot to Asia,anAfrican pivot and – most ofall – an Asian pivot to Asia.

IN MYOPINION

Selfless taxi driver keeps Chinese idealism on the road

HONESTBROKER

William Pesek

You can write, fax or e-mail a letter to:The Editor, Business Report, PO Box1014, Johannesburg 2000Fax: (011) 838-2693e-mail: [email protected] daytime telephone numbers and full address.Pseudonyms are not acceptable.The editor reserves the right to edit or reject lettersDIRECT ENQUIRES TO:JHB NEWSDESK 011 633 2484You can send feedback, complaints orsuggestions to:e-mail: [email protected]

❚❚ CONTACT

Chandran Nair

❚❚QUOTE OF THE DAYYour words have power! They can be tools that build or weapons thatdestroy… your choice. – Tony Gaskin, American life coach, motivational speaker and author

Japanese Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, right, and US President Barack Obama. Co-operationbetween countries, not demonisation, is the way forward, the writer argues. PHOTO: AP