Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Bibliography
D J Abell ‘Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know: The Toxics Release Inventory’
(1994) 47 Southern Methodist University Law Review 581.
R Abrams and D H Ward ‘Prospects for Safer Communities: Emergency Response, Community
Right-to-Know, and Prevention of Chemical Accidents’ (1990) 14 Harvard Environmental
Law Review 135.
S H Abramson ‘Confidential Business Information versus the Public’s Right to Disclosure:
Biotechnology Renews the Challenge’ (1986) 34 University of Kansas Law Review 681.
B A Ackerman and R B Stewart ‘Reforming Environmental Law’ (1985) 37 Stanford Law Review
1333.
J H Adler ‘Green Aspects of Printz: The Revival of Federalism and Its Implications for Environ-
mental Law’ (1998) 6 George Mason Law Review 573.
——— ‘Is EPCRA Unconstitutional?’ (1998) 21 Regulation 14.
W L Andreen ‘In Pursuit of NEPA’s Promise: The Role of Executive Oversight in the Implemen-
tation of Environmental Policy’ (1989) 64 Indiana Law Journal 205.
——— ‘Water Quality Today: Has the Clean Water Act Been a Success?’ (2004) 55 Alabama
Law Review 537.
J S Applegate ‘Worst Things First: Risk, Information, and Regulatory Structure in Toxic
Substances Control’ (1992) 9 Yale Journal on Regulation 277.
S Arora and T N Cason ‘Why Do Firms Volunteer to Exceed Environmental Regulations?
Understanding Participation in EPA’s 33/50 Program’ (1996) 72 Land Economics 413.
S Arrhenius ‘On the Influence of Carbonic Acid in the Air upon the Temperature of the Ground’
(1896) 41 London, Edinburgh and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science
[5th Series] 237.
M Asimow and R M Levin State and Federal Administrative Law (3rd edn West, St Paul Minn
2009).
P Bader and F Rahmeier ‘Das RECLAIM-Programm handelbarer Umweltlizenzen’ (1996) 19
Zeitschrift f€ur Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht 43.
D G Baird ‘Common Law Intellectual Property and the Legacy of International News Service v
Associated Press’ (1983) 50 University of Chicago Law Review 411.
G D Bass and A MacLean ‘Enhancing the Public’s Right-to-Know about Environmental Issues’
(1993) 4 Villanova Environmental Law Journal 287.
F M Bator ‘The Anatomy of Market Failure’ in T Cowen (ed), The Theory of Market Failure: ACritical Examination (George Mason University Press, Fairfax Virginia 1988).
W J Baumol ‘On Taxation and the Control of Externalities’ (1972) 62 American Economic
Review 307.
W J Baumol and W E Oates The Theory of Environmental Policy (2nd edn Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge Mass 1998).
D. B€unger, Deficits in EU and US Mandatory Environmental Information Disclosure,DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-22757-8, # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
451
——— ‘The Use of Standards and Prices for Protection of the Environment’ (1971) 73 Swedish
Journal of Economics 42.
J Bebbington, C Larrinaga and J M Moneva ‘Corporate Social Reporting and Reputation Risk
Management’ (2008) 21 Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 337.
J Beer and A Wesseling ‘Die neue Umweltinformationsrichtlinie im Spannungsfeld von
europ€aischer Eigentumsgew€ahrleistung und privatem Informationsinteresse’ (2006) 121
Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 133.
T C Beierle ‘The Benefits and Costs of Disclosing Information about Risks: What Do We Know
about Right-to-Know?’ (2004) 24 Risk Analysis 335.
S Bell and D McGillivray Environmental Law (7th edn Oxford University Press, Oxford, New
York 2008).
R Berger ‘Standing to Sue in Public Actions: Is It a Constitutional Requirement?’ (1969) 78 Yale
Law Journal 816.
L L Bergeson TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act (American Bar Association, Chicago 2000).
N Bernsdorff ‘Artikel 17’ in J Meyer (ed), Charta der Grundrechte der Europ€aischen Union (2ndedn Nomos, Baden-Baden 2006).
R Bifulco ‘Article 42 - Right of Access to Documents’ in W BMock and G Demuro (eds), HumanRights in Europe: Commentary on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union(Carolina Academic Press, Durham NC 2010).
A Bleckmann and M Coen Europarecht: Das Recht der Europ€aischen Union und derEurop€aischen Gemeinschaften (6th rev edn Heymanns, Cologne 1997).
A von Bogdandy ‘Gegenstand, Grundlagen und Grundbegriffe: Grundprinzipien’ in A von
Bogdandy and J Bast (eds), Europ€aisches Verfassungsrecht: Theoretische und dogmatischeGrundz€uge (2nd rev edn Springer, Dordrecht 2009).
S Bogojevic ‘Ending the Honeymoon: Deconstructing Emissions Trading Discourses’ (2009) 21
Journal of Environmental Law 443.
R G Bone ‘A New Look at Trade Secret Law: Doctrine in Search of Justification’ (1998) 86
California Law Review 241.
K-D Borchardt ‘Artikel 263 AEUV’ in C-O Lenz and K-D Borchardt (eds), EU-Vertr€age:Kommentar nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon (5th edn Bundesanzeiger/Linde, Vienna 2010).
M Borowsky ‘Artikel 2’ in J Meyer (ed), Charta der Grundrechte der Europ€aischen Union (2nd
edn Nomos, Baden-Baden 2006).
K Bosselmann The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance (Ashgate,
Aldershot 2008).
E Brandl and H Bungert ‘Constitutional Entrenchment of Environmental Protection: A Compara-
tive Analysis of Experiences Abroad’ (1992) 16 Harvard Environmental Law Review 1.
S Breier ‘Die Organisationsgewalt der Gemeinschaft am Beispiel der Errichtung der Europ€aischenUmweltagentur’ (1995) 17 Natur und Recht 516.
M Brenner ‘} 20 Besondere Einrichtungen’ in H-W Rengeling (ed), Handbuch zum europ€aischenund deutschen Umweltrecht (Allgemeines Umweltrecht: Grundlagen des Umweltrechts in der
Europ€aischen Union, Heymanns, Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Munich 2003).
R Breuer ‘Schutz von Betriebs- und Gesch€aftsgeheimnissen im Umweltrecht’ (1986) 5 Neue
Zeitschrift f€ur Verwaltungsrecht 171.G H Brundtland Our Common Future (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1987).
B Bugaric ‘Openness and Transparency in Public Administration: Challenges for Public Law’
(2004) 22 Wisconsin International Law Journal 483.
M Bullinger ‘Wettbewerbsgerechtigkeit bei pr€aventiver Wirtschaftsaufsicht: Verfassungs-
rechtlicher Schutz des Entwicklungsvorsprungs zulassungspflichtiger neuer Industrieprodukte’
(1978) 31 Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 2173.
D B€unger ‘What’s Up and What’s Next in the Arena of Pollution Control? The New E-PRTR as
a Tool Towards Innovative Climate and Environmental Conservation Approaches’ (2010) 7
Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law 177.
452 Bibliography
G de Burca ‘The Principle of Proportionality and its Application in EC Law’ in A Barav and D A
Wyatt (eds), Yearbook of European Law 1993 (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1994).
——— ‘The Quest for Legitimacy in the European Union’ (1996) 59 Modern Law Review 349.
J R Burcat and A K Hoffman ‘The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of
1986: An Explanation of Title III of SARA’ (1988) 18 Environmental Law Reporter 10007.
T P Burton ‘Access to Environmental Information: The UK Experience of Water Registers’ (1989)
1 Journal of Environmental Law 192.
C Busse ‘Die Geltung der EMRK f€ur Rechtsakte der EU’ (2000) 53 Neue Juristische
Wochenschrift 1074.
M E Butt Die Ausweitung des Rechts auf Umweltinformation durch die Aarhus-Konvention(ibidem, Stuttgart 2001).
——— ‘Erweiterter Zugang zu beh€ordlichen Umweltinformationen: Die neue EG-Umweltinfor-
mationsrichtlinie’ (2003) 22 Neue Zeitschrift f€ur Verwaltungsrecht 1071.C Calliess ‘Artikel 174 EGV’ in C Calliess and M Ruffert (eds), EUV/EGV: Kommentar des
Vertrages €uber die Europ€aische Union und des Vertrages zur Gr€undung der Europ€aischenGemeinschaft (2nd rev edn Luchterhand, Neuwied, Kriftel 2002).
——— ‘Artikel 6 EGV’ in C Calliess and M Ruffert (eds), EUV/EGV: Kommentar des Vertrages€uber die Europ€aische Union und des Vertrages zur Gr€undung der Europ€aischen Gemeinschaft(2nd rev edn Luchterhand, Neuwied, Kriftel 2002).
——— ‘Eigentumsgrundrecht’ in D Ehlers and U Becker (eds), Europ€aische Grundrechte undGrundfreiheiten (3rd rev edn de Gruyter Recht, Berlin 2009).
——— ‘The Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union’ in D Ehlers and U Becker
(eds), European Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (de Gruyter Recht, Berlin 2007).
——— ‘The Fundamental Right to Property’ in D Ehlers and U Becker (eds), European Funda-mental Rights and Freedoms (de Gruyter Recht, Berlin 2007).
C Calliess and T Kingreen ‘Artikel 6 EUV’ in C Calliess and M Ruffert (eds), EUV/EGVKommentar: Das Verfassungsrecht der Europ€aischen Union mit Europ€aischer Grundrech-techarta (3rd edn Beck, Munich 2007).
C-W Canaris and K Larenz Methodenlehre der Rechtswissenschaft (4th edn Springer, Berlin
2009).
I Canor ‘Primus Inter Pares: Who Is the Ultimate Guardian of Fundamental Rights in Europe?’
(2000) 25 European Law Review 3.
R L Carson Silent Spring (Houghton Mifflin, Boston Mass 1962).
D W Case ‘Changing Corporate Behavior through Environmental Management Systems’ (2006)
31 William and Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review 75.
——— ‘Corporate Environmental Law Reporting as Informational Regulation: A Law and
Economics Perspective’ (2005) 76 University of Colorado Law Review 379.
——— ‘Essays on State-of-the-Art Environmental Policy Tools’ (Dissertation Vanderbilt Uni-
versity 2004).
——— ‘The Law and Economics of Environmental Information as Regulation’ (2001) 31
Environmental Law Reporter 10773.
A Celotto ‘Article 21’ in W B Mock and G Demuro (eds), Human Rights in Europe: Commentaryon the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Carolina Academic Press,
Durham NC 2010).
D Chalmers European Union Law: Text and Materials (2nd reprint Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge Mass 2006).
K Chekouras ‘Balancing National Security with a Community’s Right-to-Know: Maintaining
Public Access to Environmental Information through EPCRA’s Non-Preemption Clause’
(2007) 34 Boston College Environmental Affairs Law Review 107.
E Chemerinsky Constitutional Law (Aspen, Gaithersburg 2001).
V Chiappetta ‘Myth, Chameleon or Intellectual Property Olympian? A Normative Framework
Supporting Trade Secret Law’ (1999) 8 George Mason Law Review 69.
D S Chisum Chisum on Patents (Matthew Bender, Newark NJ 2010).
Bibliography 453
S J Christiansen and S H Urquhart ‘The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
of 1986: Analysis and Update’ (1992) 6 Brigham Young University Journal of Public Law 235.
C Clark Population Growth and Land Use (2nd edn Macmillan, London 1977).
S C Clarkson, S C Whitney and J W LaMoreaux (eds) SARA, the Superfund Amendments andReauthorization Act of 1986: The Legislative History (Institute of Law and Public Health
Protection, Environmental Institute for Waste Management Studies, Arlington Virginia 1987).
R H Coase ‘The Institutional Structure of Production’ (1992) 82 American Economic Review 713.
——— ‘The Problem of Social Cost’ (1960) 3 Journal of Law and Economics 1.
M A Cohen ‘Firm Response to Environmental Regulation and Environmental Pressures’ (1997) 18
Managerial and Decision Economics 417.
——— ‘Information as a Policy Instrument in Protecting the Environment: What Have We
Learned?’ (2001) 31 Environmental Law Reporter 10425.
M A Cohen and V Santhakumar ‘Information Disclosure as Environmental Regulation: A Theo-
retical Analysis’ (2007) 37 Environmental and Resource Economics 599.
P P Craig EU Administrative Law (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2006).
P P Craig and G de Burca EU Law: Text, Cases, and Materials (4th edn Oxford University Press,
Oxford 2008).
T Crossen and V Niessen ‘NGO Standing in the European Court of Justice: Does the Aarhus
Regulation Open the Door?’ (2007) 16 Review of European Community and International
Environmental Law 332.
D Crump Cases and Materials on Constitutional Law (5th edn Matthew Bender, Newark NJ
2009).
D M Curtin ‘Betwixt and Between: Democracy and Transparency in the Governance of the
European Union’ in J A Winter and Others (eds), Reforming the Treaty on European Union:The Legal Debate (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 1996).
J H Dales Pollution, Property and Prices: An Essay in Policy-Making and Economics (Universityof Toronto Press, Toronto 1968).
T von Danwitz ‘Der Schutz von Betriebs- und Gesch€aftsgeheimnissen im Recht der Regulier-
ungsverwaltung’ (2005) 120 Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 597.
K C Davis ‘The Information Act: A Preliminary Analysis’ (1967) 34 University of Chicago Law
Review 761.
L DeKoster Locke’s Second Treatise of Civil Government: An Essay Concerning the TrueOriginal, Extent, and End of Civil Government (W B Eerdmans, Grand Rapids Michigan
1978).
M S Dennison RCRA Regulatory Compliance Guide (Noyes, Park Ridge NJ 1993).
N R Desai ‘American Chemistry Council v Johnson: Community Right-to-Know, But About
What? DC Circuit Takes Restrictive View of EPCRA’ (2006) 33 Ecology Law Quarterly 583.
N Dhondt Integration of Environmental Protection into other EC Policies: Legal Theory andPractice (Europa Law Publishing, Groningen 2003).
A Dobson Citizenship and the Environment (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003).
M C Dorf and C F Sabel ‘Constitution of Democratic Experimentalism’ (1998) 98 Columbia Law
Review 267.
C R Drahozal The Supremacy Clause: A Reference Guide to the United States Constitution(Praeger, Westport Conn 2004).
D M Driesen ‘Design, Trading, and Innovation’ in J Freeman and C D Kolstad (eds), Moving toMarkets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Twenty Years of Experience (Oxford
University Press, New York 2007).
——— ‘Does Emissions Trading Encourage Innovation?’ (2003) 33 Environmental Law Reporter
10094.
——— ‘Economic Instruments for Sustainable Development’ in B J Richardson (ed), Environ-mental Law for Sustainability (Hart, Oxford 2006).
——— ‘Is Emission Trading an Economic Incentive Program? Replacing the Command and
Control/Economic Incentive Dichotomy’ (1998) 55 Washington and Lee Law Review 289.
454 Bibliography
——— The Economic Dynamics of Environmental Law (Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Press, Cambridge Mass 2003).
——— ‘What’s Property Got to Do With It?’ (2003) 30 Ecology Law Quarterly 1003.
J S Dryzek The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (2nd edn Oxford University Press,Oxford 2005).
S E Dudley ‘It Is Time to Reevaluate the Toxic Release Inventory’ (2004) 12 Missouri Environ-
mental Law and Policy Review 1.
J Dupuit ‘De la Mesure de l’Utilite des Travaux Publics’ (1844) 8 Annales des Ponts et Chaussees
2nd Series.
K E Durham-Hammer ‘Left to Wonder: Reevaluating, Reforming, and Implementing the Emer-
gency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986’ (2004) 29 Columbia Journal of
Environmental Law 323.
R M Dworkin ‘Comment’ in A Scalia and A Gutmann (eds), A Matter of Interpretation: FederalCourts and the Law (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ 1997).
——— Life’s Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom(Vintage Books, New York 1994).
V Edwards ‘European Court of Justice: Significant Environmental Cases 2003’ (2004) 16 Journal
of Environmental Law 141.
M Eifert ‘Umweltinformation als Regelungsinstrument’ (1994) 47 Die Offentliche Verwaltung
544.
T I Emerson ‘Legal Foundations of the Right-to-Know’ (1976) 54 Washington University Law
Quarterly 1.
——— ‘Toward a General Theory of the First Amendment’ (1963) 72 Yale Law Journal 877.
A Epiney ‘Die prim€arrechtlichen Grundlagen der EG-Umweltpolitik: Geltendes Prim€arrecht undPerspektive der Verfassung’ in P-C M€uller-Graff, E Pache and D H Scheuing (eds), DieEurop€aische Gemeinschaft in der internationalen Umweltpolitik (1st edn Nomos, Baden-
Baden 2006).
——— ‘Environmental Principles’ in R Macrory (ed), Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environ-mental Law: A High Level of Protection? (Europa Law Publishing, Groningen 2006).
——— Umweltrecht in der Europ€aischen Union: Prim€arrechtliche Grundlagen.Gemeinschaftliches Sekund€arrecht (2nd edn Heymanns, Cologne 2005).
——— ‘Umweltrechtliche Querschnittsklausel und freier Warenverkehr: Die Einbeziehung
umweltpolitischer Belange €uber die Beschr€ankung der Grundfreiheit’ (1995) 17 Natur und
Recht 497.
A Epiney and A Furrer ‘Umweltschutz nach Maastricht: Ein Europa der drei Geschwindigkeiten?’
(1992) 26 Europarecht 369.
R A Epstein ‘The Constitutional Protection of Trade Secrets under the Takings Clause’ (2004) 71
University of Chicago Law Review 57.
——— ‘The Utilitarian Foundations of Natural Law’ (1989) 12 Harvard Journal of Law and
Public Policy 713.
A N de Estella The EU Principle of Subsidiarity and its Critique (Oxford University Press, Oxford,New York 2002).
J P Eurick ‘The Constitutional Right to a Healthy Environment: Enforcing Environmental
Protection through State and Federal Constitutions’ (2001) 11 International Legal Perspectives
185.
U Everling ‘Umweltschutz durch Gemeinschaftsrecht in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH’ in P
Behrens and H-J Koch (eds), Umweltschutz in der Europ€aischen Gemeinschaft:Spannungsfelder zwischen nationalem Recht und europ€aischem Gemeinschaftsrecht (1st ednNomos, Baden-Baden 1991).
M Everson ‘Independent Agencies: Hierarchy Beaters?’ (1995) 1 European Law Journal 180.
E M Falkenberry ‘The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act: A Tool for
Toxic Release Reduction in the 90’s’ (1995) 3 Buffalo Environmental Law Journal 1.
Bibliography 455
A Farmer ‘Revising IPPC: Incremental Change Rather than a Radical Overhaul of EU Industrial
Emissions Policy’ (2008) 10 Environmental Law Review 258.
J L Fernandez ‘State Constitutions, Environmental Rights Provisions, and the Doctrine of Self-
Execution: A Political Question?’ (1993) 17 Harvard Environmental Law Review 333.
S d Ferreira ‘The Fundamental Right of Access to Environmental Information in the EC: A Critical
Analysis of WWF-EPO v Council’ (2007) 19 Journal of Environmental Law 399.
R W Findley, D A Farber and J Freeman Cases and Materials on Environmental Law (6th edn
West, St Paul Minn 2003).
K J Finto ‘Regulation by Information through EPCRA’ (1990) 4 Natural Resources and Environ-
ment 13.
K Fischer and T Fetzer ‘Zul€assigkeit einer europ€aischen Chemikalienagentur mit Entscheidungs-
befugnissen’ (2003) 1 Zeitschrift f€ur Europ€aisches Umwelt- und Planungsrecht 50.
E Fisher ‘The European Union in the Age of Accountability’ (2004) 24 Oxford Journal of Legal
Studies 495.
J Fleischer ‘Die europ€aischen Agenturen als Diener vieler Herren? Zur Steuerung und Rolle von
EU-Agenturen’ in W Jann and M D€ohler (eds), Agencies in Westeuropa (Verlag f€ur Sozialwis-senschaften, Wiesbaden 2007).
W A Fletcher ‘The Structure of Standing’ (1988) 98 Yale Law Journal 221.
C Fombrun and C van Riel ‘The Reputational Landscape’ (1997) 1 Corporate Reputation Review 5.
S F€orster ‘Das Umweltmanagementsystem nach EMAS in der Praxis der Umweltverwaltung: ein
zukunftsf€ahiges Modernisierungs- und Nachhaltigkeitsinstrument?’ (2004) 15 Zeitschrift f€urUmweltrecht 25.
J Foulon, P Lanoie and B Laplante ‘Incentives for Pollution Control: Regulation or Information?’
(2002) 44 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 169.
J Freeman and C D Kolstad (eds) Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons fromTwenty Years of Experience (Oxford University Press, New York 2007).
——— ‘Prescriptive Environmental Regulation versus Market-Based Incentives’ in J Freeman
and C D Kolstad (eds),Moving to Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from TwentyYears of Experience (Oxford University Press, New York 2007).
J Freeman and A Vermeule ‘Massachusetts v EPA: From Politics to Expertise’ in D J Hutchinson,
D A Strauss and G R Stone (eds), Supreme Court Review (University of Chicago Press,
Chicago 2007).
M J Fried and M J van Damme ‘Environmental Protection in a Constitutional Setting’ (1995) 68
Temple Law Review 1369.
L Friesen ‘The Social Welfare Implications of Industry Self-Auditing’ (2006) 51 Journal of
Environmental Economics and Management 280.
M Fritsch Marktversagen und Wirtschaftspolitik: Mikro€okonomische Grundlagen staatlichenHandelns (8th rev edn Vahlen, Munich 2011).
M F€uhr Sanierung von Industrieanlagen: Am Beispiel des Anderungsgenehmigungsverfahrensnach } 15 BImSchG (1st edn Werner, Dusseldorf 1989).
M F€uhr and S Merenyi ‘Mind the Gap: Interface Problems between EC Chemicals Law and
Sectoral Environmental Legislation’ (2006) 15 Review of European Community and Interna-
tional Environmental Law 281.
A Fung and D O’Rourke ‘Reinventing Environmental Regulation from the Grassroots Up:
Explaining and Expanding the Success of the Toxics Release Inventory’ (2000) 25 Environ-
mental Management 115.
D Gartenstein-Ross ‘An Analysis of the Rights-Based Justification for Federal Intervention in
Environmental Regulation’ (2003) 14 Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 185.
B Gebers (ed) Environmental Control of Products and Substances: Legal Concepts in Europe andthe United States (Lang, Frankfurt on the Main 1994).
M Gerrard and J MGross Amending CERCLA: The Post-SARA Amendments to the ComprehensiveEnvironmental Response, Compensation, And Liability Act (American Bar Association,
Chicago 2006).
456 Bibliography
J M Gleason and B A Johnson ‘Environmental Law Across Borders’ (1995) 10 Journal of
Environmental Law and Litigation 67.
E S Goodstein Economics and the Environment (5th edn Wiley, Hoboken NJ 2008).
C Grabenwarter Europ€aische Menschenrechtskonvention: Ein Studienbuch (4th edn Beck, Munich
2009).
F P Grad and J A Mintz Environmental Law (4th edn Lexis, New York 2000).
A Graser ‘Artikel 21 GRC’ in J Schwarze (ed), EU-Kommentar (2nd edn Nomos, Baden-Baden
2009).
P L Gray EPCRA: Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act (American Bar
Association, Chicago 2002).
K Green ‘An Analysis of the Supreme Court’s Resolution of the Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act Citizen Suite Debate’ (1999) 26 Boston College Environmen-
tal Affairs Law Review 387.
M S Greve The Demise of Environmentalism in American Law (American Enterprise Institute
Press, Washington DC 1996).
M R Grossman ‘Protecting Health, Environment and Agriculture: Authorisation of Genetically
Modified Crops and Food in the United States and the European Union’ (2009) 14 Deakin Law
Review 257.
G M Guess and P G Farnham Cases in Public Policy Analysis (2nd edn Georgetown University
Press, Washington DC 2000).
E Gurlit ‘Akteneinsicht in den Vereinigten Staaten’ in GWinter (ed), Offentlichkeit von Umweltin-formationen: Europ€aische und nordamerikanische Rechte und Erfahrungen (1st edn Nomos,
Baden-Baden 1990).
——— ‘Europa auf dem Weg zur gl€asernen Verwaltung? Zum Vorschlag der Kommission f€ureine Richtlinie €uber den freien Zugang zu Informationen €uber die Umwelt’ (1989) 22
Zeitschrift f€ur Rechtspolitik 253.
S G Hadden A Citizen’s Right-to-Know: Risk Communication and Public Policy (Westview Press,
Boulder 1989).
R B Haemer ‘Reform of the Toxic Substances Control Act: Achieving Balance in the Regulation
of Toxic Substances’ (1999) 6 Environmental Lawyer 99.
R W Hahn ‘Economic Prescriptions for Environmental Problems: How the Patient Followed the
Doctor’s Orders’ (1989) 3 Journal of Economic Perspectives 95.
——— In Defense of the Economic Analysis of Regulation (American Enterprise Institute Press,
Washington DC 2005).
R W Hahn and G L Hester ‘Marketable Permits: Lessons for Theory and Practice’ (1989) 16
Ecology Law Quarterly 361.
——— ‘Where Did All the Markets Go? An Analysis of EPA’s Emissions Trading Program’
(1989) 6 Yale Journal on Regulation 109.
R W Hahn and A M McGartland ‘The Political Economy of Instrument Choice: An Examination
of the US Role in Implementing the Montreal Protocol’ (1988) 83 Northwestern University
Law Review 592.
R W Hahn and R N Stavins ‘Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection: Integrating
Theory and Practice’ (1992) 82 American Economic Review 464.
——— ‘Incentive-Based Environmental Regulation: A New Era from an Old Idea’ (1991) 18
Ecology Law Quarterly 1.
W Hahn Offenbarungspflichten im Umweltschutzrecht (Heymanns, Cologne, Berlin, Bonn,
Munich 1984).
K Hailbronner ‘Stand und Perspektiven der EG-Umweltgesetzgebung’ in C Calliess and B
Wegener (eds), Europ€aisches Umweltrecht als Chance: Die Umweltpolitik der EG und dieEinflussm€oglichkeiten der Umweltverb€ande (Blottner, Taunusstein 1992).
J T Hamilton ‘Pollution as News: Media and Stock Market Reactions to the Toxics Release
Inventory Data’ (1995) 28 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 98.
Bibliography 457
——— Regulation through Revelation: The Origin, Politics, and Impacts of the Toxics ReleaseInventory Program (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, New York 2005).
K Hansmann ‘} 27 BImSchG’ in R von Landmann and G Rohmer (eds), Umweltrecht: Kommentar(Beck, Munich 1991, Loose-Leaf, Supplemental Set 45, 2005).
G Hardin ‘The Tragedy of the Commons’ (1968) 162 Science 1243.
C Harlow ‘Francovich and the Problem of the Disobedient State’ (1996) 2 European Law Journal
199.
——— ‘Towards a Theory of Access for the European Court of Justice’ in A Barav and D AWyatt
(eds), Yearbook of European Law 1992 (Oxford University Press, Oxford 1993).
K Harrison ‘Talking with the Donkey: Cooperative Approaches to Environmental Protection’
(1998) 2 Journal of Industrial Ecology 51.
A Hartung Geheimnisschutz und Whistleblowing im deutschen und englischen Recht (VDM
Verlag Dr M€uller, Saarbr€ucken 2006).
J Heliskoski and P Leino ‘Darkness at the Break of Noon: The Case Law on Regulation No 1049/
2001 on Access to Documents’ (2006) 43 Common Market Law Review 735.
G Hermes ‘Instrumentenmix im Energieumweltrecht’ in M F€uhr, R Wahl and P von Wilmowsky
(eds), Umweltrecht und Umweltwissenschaft: Festschrift f€ur Eckard Rehbinder (E Schmidt,
Berlin 2007).
K Hesse Grundz€uge des Verfassungsrechts der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (20th reprinted edn
M€uller, Heidelberg 1999).
J R Hicks ‘The Four Consumer’s Surpluses’ (1943) 11 Review of Economic Studies 31.
M Hilf Die Organisationsstruktur der Europ€aischen Gemeinschaften: rechtliche Gestaltungsm€o-glichkeiten und Grenzen (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1982).
M Hilf and F Schorkopf ‘Artikel 6 EUV’ in E Grabitz and M Hilf (eds), Das Recht derEurop€aischen Union: Kommentar (Beck, Munich 1994, Loose-Leaf, Supplemental Set 40,
October 2009).
M Hofmeister ‘Das neue Europ€aische Schadstofffreisetzungs- und -verbringungsregister’ (2006)
11 Immissionsschutz 116.
S H€olscheidt ‘Artikel 21’ in J Meyer (ed), Charta der Grundrechte der Europ€aischen Union (2nd
edn Nomos, Baden-Baden 2006).
P M Huber ‘} 19 Grundlagen und Organe (Art. 4 EGV)’ in H-W Rengeling (ed), Handbuch zumeurop€aischen und deutschen Umweltrecht (Allgemeines Umweltrecht: Grundlagen des
Umweltrechts in der Europ€aischen Union, Heymanns, Cologne, Berlin, Bonn, Munich 2003).
A B Jaffe and Others ‘Environmental Regulation and the Competitiveness of US Manufacturing:
What Does the Evidence Tell Us?’ (1995) 33 Journal of Economic Literature 132.
L L Jaffe ‘Standing to Secure Judicial Review: Private Actions’ (1961) 75 Harvard Law
Review 255.
——— ‘Standing to Secure Judicial Review: Public Actions’ (1961) 74 Harvard Law Review
1265.
J H Jans and H H Vedder European Environmental Law (3rd edn Europa Law Publishing,
Groningen 2008).
H D Jarass Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetz (BImSchG): Kommentar (Beck, Munich 2010).
T Jefferson ‘Letter to I McPherson from August 13, 1813’ in P S Foner (ed), Basic Writings ofThomas Jefferson (Willey Book, New York 1944).
J Jendroska ‘Public Information and Participation in EC Environmental Law’ in R Macrory (ed),
Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law: A High Level of Protection? (Europa Law
Publishing, Groningen 2006).
E John ‘Access to Environmental Information: Limitations of the UK Radioactive Substances
Registers’ (1995) 7 Journal of Environmental Law 11.
N J Johnson ‘EPCRA’s Collision with Federalism’ (1994) 27 Indiana Law Review 549.
A Johnston ‘Free Allocation of Allowances under the EU Emissions Trading Scheme: Legal
Issues’ (2006) 6 Climate Policy 115.
458 Bibliography
A Jordan and Others ‘European Governance and the Transfer of New Environmental Policy
Instruments (NEPIs) in the European Union’ (2003) 81 Public Administration 555.
WKahl ‘Stellung und Aufgaben von Umweltagenturen - eine rechtsvergleichende Typologie’ in U
di Fabio, P Marburger and M Schr€oder (eds), Jahrbuch des Umwelt- und Technikrechts(Decker, Heidelberg 1996).
——— Umweltprinzip und Gemeinschaftsrecht: Eine Untersuchung zur Rechtsidee des‘bestm€oglichen Umweltschutzes’ im EWG-Vertrag (C F M€uller, Heidelberg 1993).
A K€aller ‘Artikel 37 GRC’ in J Schwarze (ed), EU-Kommentar (2nd edn Nomos, Baden-Baden
2009).
——— ‘Artikel 6 EGV’ in J Schwarze (ed), EU-Kommentar (2nd edn Nomos, Baden-Baden
2009).
B C Karkkainen ‘Bottlenecks and Baselines: Tackling Information Deficits in Environmental
Regulation’ (2008) 86 Texas Law Review 1409.
——— ‘Framing Rules: Breaking the Information Bottleneck’ (2008) 17 New York University
Environmental Law Journal 75.
——— ‘Information as Environmental Regulation: TRI and Performance Benchmarking, Precur-
sor to a New Paradigm?’ (2001) 89 Georgetown Law Journal 257.
——— ‘Information-Forcing Environmental Regulation’ (2006) 33 Florida State University Law
Review 861.
——— ‘Toward a Smarter NEPA: Monitoring and Managing Government’s Environmental
Performance’ (2002) 102 Columbia Law Review 903.
——— ‘Whither NEPA?’ (2004) 12 New York University Environmental Law Journal 333.
B C Karkkainen, A Fung and C F Sabel ‘After Backyard Environmentalism: Toward a
Performace-Based Regime of Environmental Regulation’ (2000) 44 American Behavioral
Scientist 690.
A Keessen ‘Reducing the Judicial Deficit in Multilevel Environmental Regulation: The Example
of Plant Protection Products’ (2007) 16 European Energy and Environmental Law Review 26.
J A Keithline ‘Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Citizen Suits: Should the
Supreme Court extend Gwaltney?’ (1997) 54 Washington and Lee Law Review 1.
P W Kennedy, B Laplante and J Maxwell ‘Pollution Policy: The Role for Publicly Provided
Information’ (1994) 26 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 31.
N O Keohane, R L Revesz and R N Stavins ‘The Choice of Regulatory Instruments in Environ-
mental Policy’ (1998) 22 Harvard Environmental Law Review 313.
D Kerret and G M Gray ‘What Do We Learn from Emissions Reporting? Analytical
Considerations and Comparison of Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers in the United
States, Canada, England, and Australia’ (2007) 27 Risk Analysis 203.
J Kerry and J Lieberman ‘American Power Act Bill Will Secure America’s Energy, Climate
Future’ (12 May 2010) Press Release.
M Khanna, W R Quimio and D Bojilova ‘Toxics Release Information: A Policy Tool for
Environmental Protection’ (1998) 36 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
243.
C J Kimber ‘A Comparison of Environmental Federalism in the United States and the European
Union’ (1995) 54 Maryland Law Review 1658.
T Kingreen ‘Artikel 6 EUV’ in C Calliess and M Ruffert (eds), EUV/EGV: Kommentar desVertrages €uber die Europ€aische Union und des Vertrages zur Gr€undung der Europ€aischenGemeinschaft (2nd rev edn Luchterhand, Neuwied, Kriftel 2002).
M T Kirsch ‘Upholding the Public Trust in State Constitutions’ (1997) 46 Duke Law Journal 1169.
P R Kleindorfer and E W Orts ‘Informational Regulation of Environmental Risks’ (1998) 18 Risk
Analysis 155.
W Kl€ober Risikomanagement im Chemikalienrecht: Ein Rechtsvergleich des US-amerikanischenToxic Substances Control Act und des deutschen Chemikaliengesetzes (Kovac, Hamburg
2003).
M Kloepfer Informationsrecht (Beck, Munich 2002).
Bibliography 459
——— ‘Umweltrecht als Informationsrecht’ (2005) 25 Umwelt und Planungsrecht 41.
C Koch ‘Locus Standi of Private Applicants under the EU Constitution: Preserving Gaps in the
Protection of Individuals’ Right to an Effective Remedy’ (2005) 30 European Law Review
511.
H K€ohler ‘} 17’ in W Hefermehl, H K€ohler and J Bornkamm (eds), Gesetz gegen den unlauterenWettbewerb (29th rev edn Beck, Munich 2011).
S Konar ‘Three Essays in Corporate Environmental Performance’ (Dissertation Vanderbilt Uni-
versity 1996).
S Konar and M A Cohen ‘Information as Regulation: the Effect of Community Right-to-Know
Laws on Toxic Emissions’ (1997) 32 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
109.
M E Kraft, M Stephan and T D Abel Coming Clean: Information Disclosure and EnvironmentalPerformance (Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge Mass 2011).
L Kr€amer ‘Defizite im Vollzug des EG-Umweltrechts und ihre Ursachen’ in G L€ubbe-Wolff (ed),
Der Vollzug des europ€aischen Umweltrechts (E Schmidt, Berlin 1996).
——— ‘Environmental Protection and Article 30 of EEC Treaty’ (1993) 30 CommonMarket Law
Review 111.
——— Europ€aisches Umweltrecht in der Rechtsprechung des EuGH: Dargestellt anhand von 50Urteilen (Verlag Osterreich, Vienna 2002).
——— ‘The Roots of Divergence: A European Perspective’ in N J Vig and M G Faure (eds),
Green Giants? Environmental Policies of the United States and the European Union(Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, Cambridge Mass 2004).
——— ‘Thirty Years of EC Environmental Law: Perspectives and Prospectives’ in L Kr€amer (ed),
European Environmental Law (Ashgate, Aldershot 2003).
J K€uhling Die Kommunikationsfreiheit als europ€aisches Gemeinschaftsgrundrecht (Duncker undHumblot, Berlin 1999).
P Kunzlik ‘Access to the Commission’s Documents in Environmental Cases - Confidentiality and
Public Confidence: World Wildlife Fund for Nature v The Commission of the European
Communities’ (1997) 9 Journal of Environmental Law 321.
A Kuper and J Kuper The Social Science Encyclopedia (2nd edn Routledge, London 2003).
J M Kuszaj The EPCRA Compliance Manual: Interpreting and Implementing the EmergencyPlanning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986 (American Bar Association, Chicago
1997).
K-H Ladeur ‘Die Europ€aische Umweltagentur und die Perspektiven eines europ€aischen Netzwerksder Umweltagenturen’ (1997) 19 Natur und Recht 8.
K R LaMotte, D MWilliamson and L A Hopkins ‘Emissions Trading in the US: Legal Issues’ in D
A Freestone (ed), Legal Aspects of Carbon Trading: Kyoto, Copenhagen and Beyond (Oxford
University Press, Oxford 2009).
M K Landy, M J Roberts and S R Thomas The Environmental Protection Agency: Asking theWrong Questions (expanded edn Oxford University Press, New York 1994).
R J Lazarus ‘Counting Votes and Discounting Holdings in the Supreme Court’s Takings Cases’
(1997) 38 William and Mary Law Review 1099.
——— The Making of Environmental Law (University of Chicago Press, Chicago 2006).
B Ledewitz ‘Establishing a Federal Constitutional Right to a Healthy Environment in US and in
our Prosperity’ (1998) 68 Mississippi Law Journal 565.
——— ‘The Challenge of, and Judicial Response to, Environmental Provisions in State
Constitutions’ (1991) 4 Emerging Issues in State Constitutional Law 33.
M Lee EU Environmental Law: Challenges, Change and Decision-Making (Hart, Oxford 2005).
——— ‘The Changing Aims of Environmental Liability’ (2002) 14 Environmental Law and
Management 189.
C Leifer Das europ€aische Umweltmanagementsystem EMAS als Element gesellschaftlicherSelbstregulierung (Mohr, T€ubingen 2007).
460 Bibliography
M A Lemley ‘Property, Intellectual Property, and Free Riding’ (2005) 83 Texas Law Review
1031.
——— ‘The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights’ (2008) 61 Stanford Law
Review 311.
K Lenaerts ‘In the Union We Trust: Trust-Enhancing Principles of Community Law’ (2004) 41
Common Market Law Review 317.
——— ‘Regulating the Regulatory Process: Delegation of Powers in the European Community’
(1993) 18 European Law Review 23.
M Leschke ‘} 6 Regulierungstheorie aus €okonomischer Sicht’ in M Fehling and M Ruffert (eds),
Regulierungsrecht (Mohr, T€ubingen 2010).
C J Lewis ‘When Is a Trade Secret Not So Secret: The Deficiencies of 40 CFR Part 2, Subpart B’
(2000) 30 Environmental Law 143.
C A Lewis and J M Thunder Federal Chemical Regulation: TSCA, EPCRA and the PollutionPrevention Act (Bureau of National Affairs, Washington DC 1997).
O Lieberknecht ‘Die Behandlung von Gesch€aftsgeheimnissen im deutschen und EG- Recht’
(1988) 38 Wirtschaft und Wettbewerb 833.
J J Lisa ‘EPA Administrative Enforcement Actions: An Introduction to the Consolidated Rules of
Practice’ (2005) 24 Temple Journal of Science, Technology and Environmental Law 1.
D M Lohmann ‘The Uncertain Future of Citizen Suits Under EPCRA: Can Citizens Sue for Past
Violations of the Statute’s Reporting Requirements?’ (1997) 30 Loyola of Los Angeles Law
Review 1667.
L Lowenstein ‘Financial Transparency and Corporate Governance: You Manage What You
Measure’ (1996) 96 Columbia Law Review 1335.
G L€ubbe-Wolff ‘Instrumente des Umweltrechts: Leistungsf€ahigkeit und Leistungsgrenzen’ (2001)20 Neue Zeitschrift f€ur Verwaltungsrecht 481.
A Lucarelli ‘Article 17 - Right to Property’ in W B Mock and G Demuro (eds), Human Rights inEurope: Commentary on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Carolina
Academic Press, Durham NC 2010).
——— ‘Article 37 - Environmental Protection’ in W BMock and G Demuro (eds), Human Rightsin Europe: Commentary on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union(Carolina Academic Press, Durham NC 2010).
N Luhmann ‘Funktionale Methode und juristische Entscheidung’ (1969) 94 Archiv des€offentlichen Rechts 1.
R Lukes and E Hauck ‘Geheimnisschutz bei der Kommission der Europ€aischen Gemeinschaften’
(1984) 30 Recht der Internationalen Wirtschaft 665.
R Lukes, K Vieweg and E Hauck Schutz von Betriebs- und Gesch€aftsgeheimnissen inausgew€ahlten EG-Staaten: Grundlagen und Grenzen der beh€ordlichen Verwendung (Duncker
und Humblot, Berlin 1986).
M L Lyndon ‘Information Economics and Chemical Toxicity: Designing Laws to Produce and Use
Data’ (1989) 87 Michigan Law Review 1795.
F M Lynn and J D Kartez ‘Environmental Democracy in Action: The Toxics Release Inventory’
(1994) 18 Environmental Management 511.
K E MacDonald ‘The European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register: A Case Study of Bosnia-
Herzegovina’ (2008) 10 European Journal of Law Reform 21.
R Macrory ‘Regulating in a Risky Environment’ (2001) 54 Current Legal Problems 619.
J Madison ‘Letter to W T Barry from August 4, 1822’ in G Hunt (ed), The Writings of JamesMadison (Correspondence 1819–1836, G P Putnam’s Sons, New York 1900–1910).
S Magiera ‘Artikel 42’ in J Meyer (ed), Charta der Grundrechte der Europ€aischen Union (2nd ednNomos, Baden-Baden 2006).
G Majone ‘Delegation of Regulatory Powers in a Mixed Polity’ (2002) 8 European Law Journal
319.
——— ‘Europe’s Democratic Deficit: The Question of Standards’ (1998) 4 European Law
Journal 5.
Bibliography 461
——— ‘Independence vs. Accountability? Non-Majoritarian Institutions and Democratic
Governments in Europe’ (2007) Working Paper No 94/3
——— ‘The European Community Between Social Policy and Social Regulation’ (1993) 31
Journal of Common Market Studies 153.
——— ‘The New European Agencies: Regulation by Information’ (1997) 4 Journal of European
Public Policy 262.
L A Malone and W M Tabb Environmental Law, Policy, and Practice (Thomson/West, St Paul
Minn 2007).
T Marauhn ‘Freedom of Expression, Freedom of Assembly and Association’ in D Ehlers and U
Becker (eds), European Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (de Gruyter Recht, Berlin 2007).
S de Marchi and J T Hamilton ‘Assessing the Accuracy of Self-Reported Data: An Evaluation of
the Toxics Release Inventory’ (2006) 32 Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 57.
A Marshall Principles of Economics (8th edn published 1920 Macmillan, London 1890).
A Meiklejohn ‘The First Amendment Is an Absolute’ in P B Kurland (ed), Supreme Court Review(University of Chicago Press, Chicago 1961).
P S Menell ‘Tailoring Legal Protection for Computer Software’ (1987) 39 Stanford Law Review
1329.
F I Michelman ‘Property as a Constitutional Right’ (1981) 38 Washington and Lee Law Review
1097.
——— ‘Property, Utility, and Fairness: Comments on the Ethical Foundations of ‘Just Compen-
sation’ Law’ (1967) 80 Harvard Law Review 1165.
R M Milgrim and E E Bensen Milgrim on Trade Secrets (Matthew Bender, Newark NJ 2009).
H J Mittelstaedt ‘Vollzugsverbesserung durch Steuerung zur Selbststeuerung? Das Beispiel der
Oko-Audit-Verordnung’ in G L€ubbe-Wolff (ed), Der Vollzug des europ€aischen Umweltrechts(E Schmidt, Berlin 1996).
A B Morrison ‘Balancing Access to Government-Controlled Information’ (2006) 14 Journal of
Law and Policy 115.
T E Nathan and C G Miller ‘Are Toxics Release Inventory Reductions Real?’ (1998) 32 Environ-
mental Science and Technology 368A.
R G Newell and K Rogers ‘Leaded Gasoline in the United States: The Breakthrough of Permit
Trading’ in W Harrington, R D Morgenstern and T Sterner (eds), Choosing EnvironmentalPolicy: Comparing Instruments and Outcomes in the United States and Europe (Resources forthe Future, Washington DC 2004).
C Nieß-Mache ‘Auskunftsrechte und Auskunftspflichten gegen€uber Dritten bei Abwasser-
leitungen’ (1987) 7 Umwelt und Planungsrecht 130.
M B Nimmer and D Nimmer Nimmer on Copyright (Matthew Bender, Newark NJ 2009).
M Olivetti ‘Article 2 - Right to Life’ in W BMock and G Demuro (eds), Human Rights in Europe:Commentary on the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union (Carolina Aca-
demic Press, Durham NC 2010).
T O’Riordan (ed) Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle (Cameron May, London 2001).
E E Orth Ein Grundrecht auf Umweltschutz in Europa? Eine rechtsdogmatische Einordnung desArt. 37 GRC (Lang, Frankfurt on the Main 2007).
E W Orts ‘Reflexive Environmental Law’ (1995) 89 Northwestern University Law Review 1227.
M Pallemaerts ‘EC Chemicals Legislation: A Horizontal Perspektive’ in R Macrory (ed),
Reflections on 30 Years of EU Environmental Law: A High Level of Protection? (Europa
Law Publishing, Groningen 2006).
P Park Energy Law and the Environment (Taylor and Francis, London 2002).
——— ‘Implementation of the European Union Emissions-Trading Scheme in the United King-
dom: Some Lessons to be Learned’ in O K Fauchald and J Werksman (eds), Yearbook ofInternational Environmental Law 2005 (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2007).
——— ‘The EU Emissions Trading Directive’ in M M Roggenkamp and U Hammer (eds),
European Energy Law Report II (Intensia, Antwerp 2005).
462 Bibliography
——— ‘The Implementation of the Flexible Mechanisms of the Kyoto Protocol in the United
Kingdom’ (2006) International Energy Law and Taxation Review 156.
——— ‘The UK Greenhouse Gas Emissions Trading Scheme: A Brave New World or the Result
of Hurried Thinking?’ (2001) 13 Environmental Law and Management 292.
W F Pedersen ‘Regulation and Information Disclosure: Parallel Universes and Beyond’ (2001) 25
Harvard Environmental Law Review 151.
S Peers ‘From Maastricht to Laeken: The Political Agenda of Openness and Transparency in the
European Union’ in V Deckmyn (ed), Increasing Transparency in the European Union?Conference Proceedings (European Institute of Public Administration, Maastricht 2002).
——— ‘The New Regulation on Access to Documents: A Critical Analysis’ in P Eeckhout and T
Tridimas (eds), Yearbook of European Law 2002 (Oxford University Press, Oxford 2003).
M Peeters ‘Emissions Trading as a New Dimension to European Environmental Law: The Political
Agreement of the European Council on Greenhouse Gas Allowance Trading’ (2003) 12
European Environmental Law Review 82.
I Pernice ‘Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Treaty of Amsterdam: European Constitution-
Making Revisited’ (1999) 36 Common Market Law Review 703.
A S Pfaff and C W Sanchirico ‘Environmental Self-Auditing: Setting the Proper Incentives for
Discovery and Correction of Environmental Harm’ (2000) 16 Journal of Law, Economics and
Organization 189.
B U Pfister Pr€aventiveingriffe in die Meinungs- und Pressefreiheit: Eine Darstellung deramerikanischen Doctrine of Prior Restraint und der bundesgerichtlichen Rechtsprechung zuPr€aventiveingriffen in die Meinungs- und Pressefreiheit (Lang, Bern, Frankfurt on the Main,
New York 1986).
N Philippi ‘Divergenzen im Grundrechtsschutz zwischen EuGH und EGMR’ (2000) 3 Zeitschrift
f€ur europarechtliche Studien 97.
M J Phillips ‘The Progressiveness of the Lochner Court’ (1998) 75 Denver University Law Review
453.
A C Pigou The Economics of Welfare (4th edn Macmillan, London 1932).
R H Platt ‘Toward Constitutional Recognition of the Environment’ (1970) 56 American Bar
Association Journal 1061.
F Pocchiari, V Silano and G A Zapponi ‘The Seveso Accident and its Aftermath’ in P R
Kleindorfer and H C Kunreuther (eds), Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks: From Sevesoto Bhopal and Beyond (Springer, Berlin 1987).
J H Pooley, M A Lemley and P J Toren ‘Understanding the Economic Espionage Act of 1996’
(1997) 5 Texas Intellectual Property Law Journal 177.
M E Porter and C van der Linde ‘Towards a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness
Relationship’ (1995) 9 Journal of Economic Perspectives 97.
R A Posner Economic Analysis of Law (7th edn Aspen, New York 2007).
J S Pritchard ‘A Closer Look at Title III of SARA: Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-
Know Act of 1986’ (1988) 6 Pace Environmental Law Review 203.
E Rabel ‘Aufgabe und Notwendigkeit der Rechtsvergleichung’ in H G Leser (ed), Ernst Rabel:Gesammelte Aufs€atze (Arbeiten zur Rechtsvergleichung und zur Rechtsvereinheitlichung
1919–1954, Mohr, T€ubingen 1967).
R G Rabinowitz ‘The Applicability of the Freedom of Information Act’s Disclosure Requirements
to Intellectual Property’ (1982) 57 Notre Dame Lawyer 561.
M J Radin ‘Property and Personhood’ (1982) 34 Stanford Law Review 957.
F Ragolle ‘Access to Justice for Private Applicants in the Community Legal Order: Recent (R)
evolutions’ (2003) 28 European Law Review 90.
M Rebentisch ‘Probleme des Geheimnisschutzes im Rahmen der Emissionserkl€arung’ (1980) 33Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 99.
E Rehbinder ‘Market-Based Incentives for Environmental Protection’ in R L Revesz, P Sands and
R B Stewart (eds), Environmental Law, the Economy and Sustainable Development: The
Bibliography 463
United States, the European Union, and the International Community (Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge Mass 2000).
H-W Rengeling ‘Die wirtschaftsbezogenen Grundrechte in der Europ€aischen Grundrechtecharta’
(2004) 119 Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 453.
——— ‘Eine Europ€aische Charta der Grundrechte’ in J Ipsen and E Schmidt-Jortzig (eds), Recht -Staat - Gemeinwohl: Festschrift f€ur Dietrich Rauschning (Heymanns, Cologne 2001).
——— ‘Europ€aisches Chemikalien- und Stoffrecht: Entwicklungen zur Umgestaltung des
deutschen Rechts’ (2005) 120 Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 393.
——— Umgestaltung des deutschen Chemikalienrechts durch europ€aische Chemikalienpolitik:Neunte Osnabr€ucker Gespr€ache zum Deutschen und Europ€aischen Umweltrecht am 27./28.Februar 2003 (Heymanns, Cologne 2003).
H-W Rengeling and P Szczekalla Grundrechte in der Europ€aischen Union: Charta derGrundrechte und allgemeine Rechtsgrunds€atze (Heymanns, Cologne 2004).
K Rennings ‘Redefining Innovation: Eco-Innovation Research and the Contribution from Ecolog-
ical Economics’ (2000) 32 Ecological Economics 319.
R L Revesz ‘The Race to the Bottom and Federal Environmental Regulation: A Response to
Critics’ (1997) 82 Minnesota Law Review 535.
R L Revesz, P Sands and R B Stewart (eds) Environmental Law, the Economy and SustainableDevelopment: The United States, the European Union, and the International Community(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Mass 2000).
M Rheinstein and R v Borries Einf€uhrung in die Rechtsvergleichung (2nd edn Beck, Munich
1987).
B J Richardson Environmental Regulation through Financial Organisations: ComparativePerspectives on the Industrialised Nations (Kluwer Law International, The Hague 2002).
W Richler ‘Schutz von Betriebs- und Gesch€aftsgeheimnissen im Umweltrecht’ (Dissertation
Universit€at Regensburg 1989).
E Riedel ‘Artikel 37’ in J Meyer (ed), Charta der Grundrechte der Europ€aischen Union (2nd edn
Nomos, Baden-Baden 2006).
J Rietbergen-McCracken ‘Introduction’ in J Rietbergen-McCracken and H Abaza (eds), EconomicInstruments for Environmental Management: A Worldwide Compendium of Case Studies(Earthscan, London 2000).
M Risch ‘Why Do We have Trade Secrets?’ (2007) 11 Marquette Intellectual Property Law
Review 1.
D Robinson ‘Regulatory Evolution in Pollution Control’ in T Jewell and J Steele (eds), Law inEnvironmental Decision-Making: National, European, and International Perspectives (1st
edn Clarendon Press, Oxford 1998).
M R€ockinghausen ‘Das neue Schadstoffregister PRTR: Ein weiterer Baustein im Konzept der
informierten Offentlichkeit’ (2009) 19 Zeitschrift f€ur Umweltrecht 19.
S R€ockseisen ‘Kriterien zur Beurteilung der Leistungsf€ahigkeit umweltpolitischer Instrumente’ in
M Kotulla, H Ristau and U Smeddinck (eds), Umweltrecht und Umweltpolitik (Physica,
Heidelberg 1998).
B J Rodger and AMacCulloch Competition Law and Policy in the EC and UK (4th edn Routledge,
London 2009).
A Roßnagel ‘} 10’ in H-J Koch, D H Scheuing and E Pache (eds), Gemeinschaftskommentar zumBundesimmissionsschutzgesetz (1st edn Luchterhand, Neuwied 2008).
A Roßnagel, J Sanden and S Benz ‘Die Bewertung der Leistungsf€ahigkeit umweltrechtlicher
Instrumente’ (2007) 27 Umwelt- und Planungsrecht 361.
J Rowan-Robinson and Others ‘Public Access to Environmental Information: A Means to What
End?’ (1996) 8 Journal of Environmental Law 19.
M Ruffert ‘} 7 Begriff’ in M Fehling and M Ruffert (eds), Regulierungsrecht (Mohr, T€ubingen2010).
——— ‘The Right to Pursue a Freely Chosen Occupation’ in D Ehlers and U Becker (eds),
European Fundamental Rights and Freedoms (de Gruyter Recht, Berlin 2007).
464 Bibliography
C S Russell Applying Economics to the Environment (Oxford University Press, New York 2001).
A Ryall ‘EIA and Public Participation: Determining the Limits of Member State Discretion’
(2007) 19 Journal of Environmental Law 247.
K Saarinen ‘A Method to Improve the International Comparability of Emission Data from
Industrial Installations’ (2003) 6 Environmental Science and Policy 355.
W M Sage ‘Regulating through Information: Disclosure Laws and American Health Care’ (1999)
99 Columbia Law Review 1701.
P Samuelson ‘Information as Property: Do Ruckelshaus and Carpenter Signal a Changing Direc-
tion in Intellectual Property Law’ (1989) 38 Catholic University Law Review 365.
P A Samuelson ‘The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure’ (1954) 36 Review of Economics and
Statistics 387.
P H Sand ‘Information Disclosure as an Instrument of Environmental Governance’ (2003) 63
Zeitschrift f€ur ausl€andisches €offentliches Recht und V€olkerrecht 487.P Sands Principles of International Environmental Law (2nd edn Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge 2009).
R Sannwald ‘Artikel 20a’ in B Schmidt-Bleibtreu, H Hofmann and H B Brockmeyer (eds),
Kommentar zum Grundgesetz (11th edn Heymanns, Cologne 2008).
J L Sax Defending the Environment: A Strategy for Citizen Action (Knopf, New York 1971).
——— ‘Takings and the Police Power’ (1964) 74 Yale Law Journal 36.
A Scalia ‘Common-Law Courts in a Civil Law System: The Role of United States Federal Courts
in Interpreting the Constitution and Laws’ in A Scalia and A Gutmann (eds), A Matter ofInterpretation: Federal Courts and the Law (Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ 1997).
——— ‘The Doctrine of Standing as an Essential Element of the Separation of Powers’ (1983) 17
Suffolk University Law Review 881.
A B Schatz ‘Regulating Greenhouse Gases by Mandatory Information Disclosure’ (2008) 26
Virginia Environmental Law Journal 335.
A Scheidler ‘Der Anspruch auf Zugang zu Umweltinformationen: Zur Neufassung des Umweltin-
formationsgesetzes’ (2006) 26 Umwelt und Planungsrecht 13.
T Schilling Rang und Geltung von Normen in gestuften Rechtsordnungen (Arno Spitz, Berlin 1994).S Schlacke, C Schrader and T Bunge Informationsrechte, Offentlichkeitsbeteiligung und
Rechtsschutz im Umweltrecht: Aarhus-Handbuch (E Schmidt, Berlin 2010).
T Schomerus ‘Abgaben als Instrument des Klimaschutzes’ (2010) 86 Zeitschrift f€ur Z€olle und
Verbrauchsteuern 141.
——— ‘Pathways to Energy Sustainability: New Instruments for Promoting Energy Efficiency’ in
M Rodi (ed), The Paradigm Shift towards Energy Sustainability: Climate Change, Innovationand the Optimal Instrument Mix (Lexxion, Berlin 2010).
——— ‘Rechtliche Instrumente zur Verbesserung der Energienutzung’ (2009) 28 Neue Zeitschrift
f€ur Verwaltungsrecht 418.T Schomerus and S Clausen ‘Informationspflichten Privater nach dem neuen Umweltinforma-
tionsgesetz am Beispiel der Exportkreditversicherung’ (2005) 16 Zeitschrift f€ur Umweltrecht
575.
T Schomerus and U Tolkmitt ‘Bahnunternehmen als informationspflichtige Stellen nach
britischem und deutschem Umweltinformationsrecht’ (2009) 19 Zeitschrift f€ur Umweltrecht
188.
M Schr€oder ‘} 9 Umweltschutz als Gemeinschaftsziel und Grunds€atze des Umweltschutzes’ in H-
W Rengeling (ed), Handbuch zum europ€aischen und deutschen Umweltrecht (Allgemeines
Umweltrecht: Grundlagen des Umweltrechts in der Europ€aischen Union, Heymanns, Cologne,
Berlin, Bonn, Munich 2003).
——— ‘Der Schutz von Betriebs- und Gesch€aftsgeheimnissen im Umweltschutzrecht’ (1985) 5
Umwelt und Planungsrecht 394.
——— ‘Die Ber€ucksichtigung der Interessen der Wirtschaft bei der Gestaltung und Umsetzung
der Umweltinformationsrichtlinie der Europ€aischen Gemeinschaft’ (1991) 155 Zeitschrift f€urdas gesamte Handelsrecht und Wirtschaftsrecht 471.
Bibliography 465
M von Schwanenfl€ugel ‘Das Offentlichkeitsprinzip des EG-Umweltrechts’ (1991) 106 Deutsches
Verwaltungsblatt 93.
J Schwarze ‘Artikel 17 GRC’ in J Schwarze (ed), EU-Kommentar (2nd edn Nomos, Baden-Baden
2009).
A W Scott The Law of Trusts (3rd edn Little Brown and Co, Boston Mass, Toronto 1967).
J Scott ‘Permissibility of Citizen Suits Under EPCRA for Wholly Past Violations in the Seventh
Circuit: Citizens for a Better Environment v Steel Co’ (1997) 4 Wisconsin Environmental Law
Journal 215.
J Scott EC Environmental Law (Longman, London 1998).
K Segerson and T Tietenberg ‘The Structure of Penalties in Environmental Enforcement: An
Economic Analysis’ (1992) 23 Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 179.
R W Shavelson ‘EPCRA, Citizen Suits and the Sixth Circuit’s Assault on the Public’s Right-to-
Know’ (1995) 2 Albany Law Environmental Outlook 29.
D L Shelton ‘Environmental Rights in the European Community’ (1993) 16 Hastings International
and Comparative Law Review 557.
P Shrivastava Bhopal: Anatomy of a Crisis (Ballinger, Cambridge Mass 1987).
H Siebert Economics of the Environment: Theory and Policy (7th edn Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg2008).
J P Siemer Das Coase-Theorem: Inhalt, Aussagewert und Bedeutung f€ur die €okonomische Analysedes Rechts (LIT Verlag, Minster, Hamburg 1999).
J B Skjaerseth and J Wettestad EU Emissions Trading: Initiation, Decision-Making and Imple-mentation (Ashgate, Hampshire 2008).
M M Slotboom ‘Participation of NGOs before the WTO and EC Tribunals: Which Court Is the
Better Friend?’ (2006) 5 World Trade Review 69.
A Smith The Wealth of Nations (Modern Library, New York 1937).
C Sobotta Transparenz in den Rechtsetzungsverfahren der Europ€aischen Union: Stand undPerspektiven des Gemeinschaftsrechts unter besonderer Ber€ucksichtigung des Grundrechtesauf Zugang zu Informationen (1st edn Nomos, Baden-Baden 2001).
A Stadler Der Schutz des Unternehmensgeheimnisses im deutschen und US-amerikanischenZivilprozeß und im Rechtshilfeverfahren (Mohr, T€ubingen 1989).
R N Stavins ‘A Meaningful US Cap-And-Trade System to Address Climate Change’ (2008) 32
Harvard Environmental Law Review 293.
——— ‘Addressing Climate Change With a Comprehensive US Cap-and-Trade System’ (2008)
24 Oxford Review of Economic Policy 298.
——— ‘Market-Based Environmental Policies’ in P R Portney and R N Stavins (eds), PublicPolicies for Environmental Protection (2nd edn Resources for the Future, Washington DC
2000).
——— ‘Market-Based Environmental Policies: What Can We Learn from US Experience (and
Related Research)?’ in J Freeman and C D Kolstad (eds),Moving to Markets in EnvironmentalRegulation: Lessons from Twenty Years of Experience (Oxford University Press, New York
2007).
M L Stearns ‘From Lujan to Laidlaw: A Preliminary Model of Environmental Standing’ (2001) 11
Duke Environmental Law and Policy Forum 321.
S Stec and S Casey-Lefkowitz The Aarhus Convention: An Implementation Guide (United
Nations, New York 2000).
N Stern The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review (Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge Mass 2007).
T Sterner and G K€ohlin ‘Environmental Taxes in Europe’ (2003) 3 Public Finance and Manage-
ment 117.
P Stewart ‘Or Of the Press’ (1975) 26 Hastings Law Journal 631.
R B Stewart ‘A New Generation of Environmental Regulation?’ (2001) 29 Capital University Law
Review 21.
466 Bibliography
——— ‘Economic Incentives for Environmental Protection: Opportunities and Obstacles’ in R L
Revesz, P Sands and R B Stewart (eds), Environmental Law, the Economy and SustainableDevelopment: The United States, the European Union, and the International Community(Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Mass 2000).
——— ‘Environmental Quality as a National Good in a Federal State’ (1997) 1997 University of
Chicago Legal Forum 199.
——— ‘Regulation, Innovation, and Administrative Law: A Conceptual Framework’ (1981) 69
California Law Review 1256.
G J Stigler ‘The Economics of Information’ (1961) 69 Journal of Political Economy 213.
——— ‘Two Notes on the Coase Theorem’ (1989) 99 Yale Law Journal 631.
J E Stiglitz Economics of the Public Sector (2nd edn Norton, New York 1988).
——— ‘Knowledge as a Global Public Good’ in I Kaul, I Grunberg and M A Stern (eds), GlobalPublic Goods: International Cooperation in the 21st Century (Oxford University Press, Oxford1999).
R Streinz Bundesverfassungsgerichtlicher Grundrechtsschutz und Europ€aischesGemeinschaftsrecht: Die €Uberpr€ufung grundrechtsbeschr€ankender deutscher Begr€undungs-und Vollzugsakte von Europ€aischem Gemeinschaftsrecht durch das Bundesverfassungsgericht(1st edn Nomos, Baden-Baden 1989).
K M Sullivan and G Gunther Constitutional Law (16th edn Foundation Press, New York 2007).
C R Sunstein ‘Informational Regulation and Informational Standing: Akins and Beyond’ (1999)
147 University of Pennsylvania Law Review 613.
——— ‘Informing America: Risk, Disclosure, and the First Amendment’ (1993) 20 Florida State
University Law Review 653.
——— Laws of Fear: Beyond the Precautionary Principle (4th printing Cambridge University
Press, Cambridge Mass 2008).
——— ‘What’s Standing after Lujan? Of Citizen Suits, “Injuries,” and Article III’ (1992) 91
Michigan Law Review 163.
J Taeger Die Offenbarung von Betriebs- und Gesch€aftsgeheimnissen (1st edn Nomos, Baden-
Baden 1988).
G Taistra ‘Die Porter-Hypothese zur Umweltpolitik’ (2001) 24 Zeitschrift f€ur Umweltpolitik und
Umweltrecht 241.
T P Terrell and J S Smith ‘Publicity, Liberty, and Intellectual Property: A Conceptual and
Economic Analysis of the Inheritability Issue’ (1985) 34 Emory Law Journal 1.
C B Thanawalla Complying with TSCA Inventory Requirements: A Guide with Step-by-StepProcesses for Chemical Manufacturers, Processors, and Importers (Wiley-Interscience, New
York 2002).
H Thumann ‘Beh€ordenauskunft €uber Emissionen und emissionsbegrenzende Auflagen im Rahmen
des Bundes-Immissionsschutzgesetzes’ (Dissertation Universit€at Regensburg 1991).
D Thym ‘In the Name of Sovereign Statehood: A Critical Introduction to the Lisbon Judgment of
the German Constitutional Court’ (2009) 46 Common Market Law Review 1795.
T Tietenberg ‘Design Lessons from Existing Air Pollution Control Systems: The United States’ in
S S Hanna and MMunasinghe (eds), Property Rights in a Social and Ecological Context: CaseStudies and Design Applications (The World Bank, Washington DC 1995).
——— ‘Disclosure Strategies for Pollution Control’ (1998) 11 Environmental and Resource
Economics 587.
——— Emissions Trading: An Exercise in Reforming Pollution Policy (Resources for the Future,Washington DC 1985).
——— Emissions Trading: Principles and Practice (2nd edn Resources for the Future,
Washington DC 2006).
——— ‘Tradable Permits in Principle and Practice’ in J Freeman and C D Kolstad (eds), Movingto Markets in Environmental Regulation: Lessons from Twenty Years of Experience (Oxford
University Press, New York 2007).
Bibliography 467
T Tietenberg and L Lewis Environmental and Natural Resource Economics (8th edn Pearson,
Boston Mass 2009).
A Topol and R Snow Superfund Law and Procedure (West, St Paul Minn 1992).
L H Tribe American Constitutional Law (2nd edn Foundation Press, Mineola NY 1988).
A Turiaux Zugangsrechte zu Umweltinformationen nach der EG-Richtlinie 90/313 und demdeutschen Verwaltungsrecht (Lang, Frankfurt on the Main 1995).
F J Turner The Frontier in American History (Henry Holt and Company, New York 1920).
J A Usher ‘Direct and Individual Concern: An Effective Remedy or a Conventional Solution?’
(2003) 28 European Law Review 575.
M P Vandenbergh ‘Climate Change: The China Problem’ (2008) 81 Southern California Law
Review 905.
M P Vandenbergh and A C Steinemann ‘The Carbon-Neutral Individual’ (2007) 82 New York
University Law Review 1673.
D Vandermeersch ‘The Single European Act and the Environmental Policy of the EEC’ (1987) 12
European Law Review 407.
D C Vladeck ‘Information Access: Surveying the Current Legal Landscape of Federal Right-to-
Know Laws’ (2008) 86 Texas Law Review 1787.
N Vogel ‘PG and E Settles Last Chromium 6 Case’ Los Angeles Times (4 April 2008).
P V van Vormizeele ‘Artikel 2 GRC’ in J Schwarze (ed), EU-Kommentar (2nd edn Nomos, Baden-
Baden 2009).
——— ‘Artikel 42 GRC’ in J Schwarze (ed), EU-Kommentar (2nd edn Nomos, Baden-Baden
2009).
K Warner and Others In Search of Shelter: Mapping the Effects of Climate Change on HumanMigration and Displacement (CARE, Bonn, Berlin 2009).
E P Weber Pluralism by the Rules: Conflict and Cooperation in Environmental Regulation(Georgetown University Press, Washington DC 1998).
R S Weeks ‘The Bumpy Road to Community Preparedness: The Emergency Planning and
Community Right-to-Know Act’ (1998) 4 Environmental Lawyer 827.
G Weigmann ‘Okologie und Umweltforschung’ in M J€anicke, U E Simonis and G Weigmann
(eds), Wissen f€ur die Umwelt (de Gruyter Recht, Berlin 1986).
J H Weiler ‘The Transformation of Europe’ (1991) 100 Yale Law Journal 2403.
B A Weintraub ‘Access to Information’ in M Gerrard and S R Foster (eds), Law of EnvironmentalJustice: Theories and Procedures to Address Disproportionate Risks (American Bar Associa-
tion, Chicago 2008).
D A Westbrook ‘Environmental Policy in the European Community: Observations on the Euro-
pean Environment Agency’ (1991) 15 Harvard Environmental Law Review 257.
D Wheeler and T Tietenberg ‘Empowering the Community: Information Strategies for Pollution
Control’ in H Folmer and Others (eds), Frontiers of Environmental Economics (Edward Elgar,Cheltenham, Northampton Mass 2001).
B Wiegand ‘Bestm€oglicher Umweltschutz als Aufgabe der Europ€aischen Gemeinschaften: Zur
Bedeutung des Gemeinschaftszieles Umweltschutz f€ur die Europ€aische Integration’ (1993)
108 Deutsches Verwaltungsblatt 533.
T A Wilkins ‘Mootness Doctrine and the Post-Compliance Pursuit of Civil Penalties in Environ-
mental Citizen Suits’ (1993) 17 Harvard Environmental Law Review 389.
R Winkler Die Grundrechte der Europ€aischen Union: System und allgemeine Grundrechtslehren(Springer, Vienna 2006).
S Winkler Der Beitritt der Europ€aischen Gemeinschaften zur Europ€aischen Menschenrechts-konvention (1st edn Nomos, Baden-Baden 2000).
G Winter ‘Akteneinsichtsrechte in Frankreich’ (1989) 9 Umwelt und Planungsrecht 81.
——— ‘Kompetenzen der Europ€aischen Gemeinschaft im Verwaltungsvollzug’ in G L€ubbe-Wolff (ed), Der Vollzug des europ€aischen Umweltrechts (E Schmidt, Berlin 1996).
——— ‘Umweltrechtliche Prinzipien des Gemeinschaftsrechts’ (2003) 13 Zeitschrift f€urUmweltrecht 137.
468 Bibliography
G Winter and E Gurlit ‘Zusammenfassender Bericht’ in G Winter (ed), Offentlichkeit vonUmweltinformationen: Europ€aische und nordamerikanische Rechte und Erfahrungen (1st
edn Nomos, Baden-Baden 1990).
S L Winter ‘The Metaphor of Standing and the Problem of Self-Governance’ (1988) 40 Stanford
Law Review 1371.
Wissenschaftlicher Beirat der Bundesregierung Globale Umweltver€anderungen Kassensturz f€urden Weltklimavertrag - Der Budgetansatz: Sondergutachten 2009 (1st edn Wissenschaftlicher
Beirat der Bundesregierung, Berlin 2009).
S M Wolf ‘Fear and Loathing about the Public Right-to-Know: The Surprising Success of the
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act’ (1996) 11 Journal of Land Use and
Environmental Law 218.
H-M Wolffgang ‘Artikel 6 EUV’ in C-O Lenz and K-D Borchardt (eds), EU-Vertr€age:Kommentar nach dem Vertrag von Lissabon (5th edn Bundesanzeiger/Linde, Vienna 2010).
H-P Zils Die Wertigkeit des Umweltschutzes in Beziehung zu anderen Aufgaben der Europ€aischenGemeinschaft: Untersuchungen zur Anwendung der Querschnittsklausel Art. 130r Abs. 2 Satz2 EWGV im Gemeinschaftsrecht (Decker, Heidelberg 1994).
M Zuleeg ‘Vorbehaltene Kompetenzen der Mitgliedstaaten der Europ€aischen Gemeinschaft auf
dem Gebiete des Umweltschutzes’ (1987) 6 Neue Zeitschrift f€ur Verwaltungsrecht 280.K Zweigert and H K€otz Einf€uhrung in die Rechtsvergleichung: Auf dem Gebiete des Privatrechts
(3rd rev edn Mohr, T€ubingen 1996).
Bibliography 469
Table of Cases
Bundesverfassungsgericht Bananenmarktordnung BVerfGE 102, 147.
——— Lissabon BVerfGE 123, 267.
——— Maastricht BVerfGE 89, 155.
——— Solange I BVerfGE 37, 271.
——— Solange II BVerfGE 73, 339.
Court of Appeals 3M Co v Browner 17 F 3d 1453 (DC Circuit 1994).
——— A L Laboratories Inc v EPA 826 F 2d 1123 (DC Circuit 1987).
——— American Chemistry Council v Johnson 406 F 3d 738 (DC Circuit 2005).
——— Anderson v Department of Health and Human Services 907 F 2d 936 (10th Circuit 1990).
——— Atlantic States Legal Foundation Inc v United Musical Instruments USA Inc 61 F 3d 473
(6th Circuit 1995).
——— Calvert Cliffs’ Coordinating Committee Inc v US Atomic Energy Commission 449 F 2d
1109 (DC Circuit 1971).
——— Campbell v Civil Service Commission 539 F 2d 58 (10th Circuit 1976).
——— Citizens for a Better Environment v Steel Co 90 F 3d 1237 (7th Circuit 1996).
——— Critical Mass Energy Project v Nuclear Regulatory Commission 975 F 2d 871 (DC Circuit
1992).
——— Davis v Department of Justice 460 F 3d 92 (DC Circuit 2006).
——— E I Du Pont de Nemours and Co Inc v Christopher 431 F 2d 1012 (5th Circuit 1970).
——— Evans v Department of Transportation 446 F 2d 821 (5th Circuit 1971).
——— Fiduccia v Department of Justice 185 F 3d 1035 (9th Circuit 1999).
——— Founding Church of Scientology v Bell 603 F 2d 945 (DC Circuit 1979).
——— Frankel v Securities and Exchange Commission 460 F 2d 813 (2nd Circuit 1972).
——— In Re Uniservices Inc 517 F 2d 492 (7th Circuit 1975).
——— Inner City Press/Community on the Move v Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System(II) 463 F 3d 239 (2nd Circuit 2006).
——— Learning Curve Toys Inc v PlayWood Toys Inc 342 F 3d 714 (7th Circuit 2003).
——— McClellan Ecological Seepage Situation v Carlucci 835 F 2d 1282 (9th Circuit 1987).
——— McGehee v Casey 718 F 2d 1137 (DC Circuit 1983).
——— Metallurgical Industries Inc v Fourtek Inc 790 F 2d 1195 (5th Circuit 1986).
——— Moore v Ford Motor Co (II) 43 F 2d 685 (2nd Circuit 1930).
——— National Labor Relations Board v Clement Brothers Company 407 F 2d 1027 (5th Circuit
1969).
——— National Parks and Conservation Association v Morton 498 F 2d 765 (DC Circuit 1974).
——— Natural Resources Defense Council v EPA (I) 478 F 2d 875 (1st Circuit 1973).
——— Natural Resources Defense Council v EPA (II) 494 F 2d 519 (2nd Circuit 1974).
D. B€unger, Deficits in EU and US Mandatory Environmental Information Disclosure,DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-22757-8, # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
471
——— Office of Communication of United Church of Christ v Federal Communications Commis-sion (I) 359 F 2d 994 (DC Circuit 1966).
——— Office of Communication of United Church of Christ v Federal Communications Commis-sion (II) 425 F 2d 543 (DC Circuit 1969).
——— Open America v Watergate Special Prosecution Force 547 F 2d 605 (DC Circuit 1976).
——— Painton and Co v Bourns Inc 442 F 2d 216 (2nd Circuit 1971).
——— Passaic Valley Sewerage Commissioners v US Department of Labor 992 F 2d 474 (3rd
Circuit 1993).
——— Public Citizen Health Research Group v FDA 704 F 2d 1280 (DC Circuit 1983).
——— Rohm and Haas Co v Adco Chemical Co 689 F 2d 424 (3rd Circuit 1982).
——— School District of City of Allentown v Marshall 657 F 2d 16 (3rd Circuit 1981).
——— Sheldon v Metro-Goldwyn Pictures Corp 81 F 2d 49 (2nd Circuit 1936).
——— Spector Motor Service Inc v Walsh 139 F 2d 809 (2nd Circuit 1944).
——— Stop H-3 Association v Dole 870 F 2d 1419 (9th Circuit 1989).
——— Troy Corp v Browner 120 F 3d 277 (DC Circuit 1997).
——— United Steelworkers of America v Thorne G Auchter 763 F 2d 728 (3rd Circuit 1985).
——— Vaughn v Rosen 484 F 2d 820 (DC Circuit 1973).
——— Willy v Coastal Corp 855 F 2d 1160 (5th Circuit 1988).
Court of Chancery Newbery v James 35 ER 1011 (1817).
Court of Claims Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp v United States 157 F Supp 939 (1958).
Court of First Instance, Case T-309/97 Bavarian Lager Company Ltd v Commission (I) [1999]ECR II-3217.
———, Case T-194/04 Bavarian Lager Company Ltd v Commission (II) [2007] ECR II-4523.
———, Case T-194/94 Carvel and Guardian Newspaper Ltd v Council [1995] ECR II-2765.
———, Case T-120/10 (Action brought on 8 March 2010) ClientEarth v Commission [2010] OJ C134/42 (Application).
———, Case T-168/02 IFAW v Commission [2004] ECR II-4135.
———, Case T-92/98 Interporc GmbH v Commission (I) [1999] ECR II-3521.
———, Case T-177/01 Jego-Quere and Cie SA v Commission [2002] ECR II-2365.
———, Case T-123/99 JT’s Corp Ltd v Commission [2000] ECR II-3269.
———, Case T-211/00 Kuijer v Council [2002] ECR II-485.
———, Case T-403/05 MyTravel Group Plc v Commission [2008] ECR II-2027.
———, Case T-191/99 Petrie and Others v Commission [2001] ECR II-3677.
———, Joined Cases T-110, 150 and 405/03 Sison v Council (I) [2005] ECR II-1429.
———, Case T-585/93 Stichting Greenpeace Council (Greenpeace International) and Others vCommission (I) [1995] ECR II-2205.
———, Case T-174/95 Svenska Journalistf€orbundet v Council [1998] ECR II-2289.
———, Case T-178/05 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland v Commission[2005] ECR II-4807.
———, Case T-2/03 Verein f€ur Konsumenteninformation v Commission [2005] ECR II-1121.
———, Case T-396/09 (Action brought on 6 October 2009) Vereniging Milieudefensie andStichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht v Commission (I) [2009] OJ C 297/28
(Application).
———, Case T-396/09 (Order of the President of the General Court of 17 December 2009)
Vereniging Milieudefensie and Stichting Stop Luchtverontreiniging Utrecht v Commission (II)[2010] OJ C 37/38.
———, Case T-264/04 WWF European Policy Programme v Council [2007] ECR II-911.
———, Case T-105/95 WWF UK (World Wide Fund for Nature) v Commission [1997] ECR II-
313.
Court of Human Rights Cantoni v France Application No 17862/91, Judgment of 15 November
1996.
——— Guerra and Others v Italy Application No 14967/89, Judgment of 19 February 1998.
472 Table of Cases
——— Matthews v The United Kingdom Application No 24833/94, Judgment of 18 February
1999.
Court of Justice, Case 145/83 Adams v Commission (I) [1985] ECR 3595.
———, Case 53/84 Adams v Commission (II) [1985] ECR 3595.
———, Case 53/85 Akzo Chemie BV and Akzo Chemie UK Ltd v Commission [1986] ECR 1965.
———, Case 33/88 Allue and Coonan v Universita degli studi di Venezia [1989] ECR 1591.
———, Joined Cases C-259, 331 and 332/91 Allue and Others v Universita degli studi di Venezia[1993] ECR I-4309.
———, Case 59/83 Biovilac v EEC [1984] ECR 4057.
———, Case 179/84 Bozzetti v Invernizzi [1985] ECR 2301.
———, Case C-340/06 Commission v Austria [2007] ECR I-105.
———, Case C-300/89 Commission v Council (Directive on Titanium Dioxide) [1991] ECR I-
2867.
———, Case C-155/91 Commission v Council (Directive on Waste) [1993] ECR 939.
———, Case 302/86 Commission v Denmark [1988] ECR 4607.
———, Case C-233/00 Commission v France [2003] ECR I-6625.
———, Case C-217/97 Commission v Germany [1999] ECR I-5087.
———, Case C-217/97 Commission v Germany, Opinion AG Fennelly [1999] ECR I-5087.
———, Case C-216/05 Commission v Ireland (I) [2006] ECR I-10787.
———, Case C-216/05 Commission v Ireland (I), Opinion AG Stix-Hackl [2006] ECR I-10787.
———, Case C-391/06 Commission v Ireland (II) [2007] ECR I-65.
———, Case C-263/02 P Commission v Jego-Quere and Cie SA [2004] ECR I-3425.
———, Case C-552/07 Commune de Sausheim v Azelvandre [2009] ECR I-987.
———, Case C-552/07 Commune de Sausheim v Azelvandre, Opinion AG Sharpston [2009] ECRI-987.
———, Case 6/64 Costa v ENEL [1964] ECR 585.
———, Case C-353/99 P Council v Hautala [2001] ECR I-9565.
———, Case C-350/88 Delacre v Commission [1990] ECR I-395.
———, Case 25/70 Einfuhr- und Vorratsstelle f€ur Getreide und Futtermittel v K€oster [1970] ECR1161.
———, Case 56/75 Elz v Commission [1976] ECR 1097.
———, Joined Cases 209–215 and 218/78 FEDETAB v Commission [1980] ECR 3125.
———, Joined Cases 6 and 9/90 Francovich and Bonifaci v Italy [1991] ECR I-5357.
———, Case C-280/93 Germany v Council [1994] ECR I-4973.
———, Case C-316/01 Glawischnig v Bundesminister f€ur soziale Sicherheit und Generationen[2003] ECR I-5995.
———, Case 78–70 Grammophon GmbH v Metro GmbH and Co KG [1971] ECR 487.
———, Case 44/79 Hauer v Land Rheinland-Pfalz [1979] ECR 3727.
———, Case 85/76 Hoffmann-La Roche and Co AG v Commission [1979] ECR 461.
———, Case C-186/04 Housieaux v Delegues du Conseil de la Region de Bruxelles-Capitale[2005] ECR I-3299.
———, Case C-186/04 Housieaux v Delegues du Conseil de la Region de Bruxelles-Capitale,Opinion AG Kokott [2005] ECR I-3299.
———, Case 11/70 Internationale Handelsgesellschaft mbH v Einfuhr- und VorratsstelleGetreide [1970] ECR 1125.
———, Case C-41/00 P Interporc GmbH v Commission (II) [2003] ECR I-2125.
———, Case C-353/01 P Mattila v Council and Commission [2004] ECR I-1073.
———, Case C-353/01 P Mattila v Council and Commission, Opinion AG Leger [2004] ECR I-
1073.
———, Case C-321/96 Mecklenburg v Kreis Pinneberg [1998] ECR I-3809.
———, Joined Cases 9 and 10/56 Meroni v High Authority of the European Coal and SteelCommunity [1958] ECR 133, 157.
———, Case C-200/96 Metronome Musik GmbH v Music Point GmbH [1998] ECR I-1953.
Table of Cases 473
———, Case 195/80 Michel v European Parliament [1981] ECR 2861.
———, Case 110/84 Municipality of Hillegom v Hillenius [1985] ECR 3947.
———, Case 136/79 National Panasonic (UK) Limited v Commission [1980] ECR 2033.
———, Case C-58/94 Netherlands v Council [1996] ECR I-2169.
———, Case C-58/94 Netherlands v Council, Opinion AG Tesauro [1996] ECR I-2169.
———, Case 4/73 Nold v Commission [1974] ECR 491.
———, Case 18/57 Nold v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community [1959]
ECR 41.
———, Case 25–62 Plaumann v Commission [1963] ECR 95.
———, Case 240/83 Procureur de la Republique v ADBHU [1985] ECR 531.
———, Case C-293/97 Queen v Standley and Others [1999] ECR I-2603.
———, Case 138/79 Roquette Freres v Council [1980] ECR 3333.
———, Joined Cases 36, 37, 38 and 40/59 Ruhrkolen-Verkaufsgesellschaft and Others v HighAuthority of the European Coal and Steel Community [1960] ECR 423.
———, Case C-284/95 Safety Hi-Tech Srl v S and T Srl [1998] ECR I-4301.
———, Case 265/87 Schr€ader v Hauptzollamt Gronau [1989] ECR 2237.
———, Case 40/64 Sgarlata and Others v Commission [1965] ECR 215.
———, Case C-266/05 P Sison v Council (II) [2007] ECR I-1233.
———, Joined Cases 8-11/66 Societe Anonayme Cimenteries CBR Cementsbedrijven NV andOthers v Commission [1967] ECR 75.
———, Case 230/78 SpA Eridania-Zuccherifici Nazionali v Minister of Agriculture and Forestry[1979] ECR 2749.
———, Case 29/69 Stauder v Ulm [1969] ECR 419.
———, Case C-321/95 P Stichting Greenpeace Council (Greenpeace International) and Others vCommission (II) [1998] ECR I-1651.
———, Case 1/58 Stork v High Authority of the European Coal and Steel Community [1959] ECR17.
———, Case C-64/05 P Sweden and IFAW v Commission [2007] ECR I-11389.
———, Joined Cases C-39 and 52/05 P Sweden and Turco v Council [2008] ECR I-4723.
———, Case C-50/00 P Union de Pequenos Agricultores v Council [2002] ECR I-6677.
———, Case C-50/00 P Union de Pequenos Agricultores v Council, Opinion AG Jacobs [2002]ECR I-6677.
———, Joined Cases 154, 205, 206, 226–228, 263 and 264/78, 39, 31, 83 and 85/79 Valsabbiaand Others v Commission [1980] ECR 907.
———, Case 26/62 Van Gend and Loos v Netherlands Inland Revenue Administration [1963]
ECR 1.
———, Case 300/86 Van Landschoot v Mera NV [1988 ] ECR 3443.
———, Case 5/88 Wachauf v Bundesamt f€ur Ern€ahrung und Forstwirtschaft [1989] ECR 2609.
District Court Appleton v FDA 451 F Supp 2d 129 (DDC 2006).
——— Atlantic States Legal Foundation Inc v Buffalo Envelope 823 F Supp 1065 (WDNY 1993).
——— Atlantic States Legal Foundation Inc v Whiting Roll-Up Door Manufacturing Corp (I) 772F Supp 745 (WDNY 1991).
——— Atlantic States Legal Foundation Inc v Whiting Roll-Up Door Manufacturing Corp (II)1994 US Dist LEXIS 6071 (WDNY 1994).
——— Black Hills Alliance v United States Forest Service 603 F Supp 117 (DSD 1984).
——— Braun v Kelsey-Hayes Co 635 F Supp 75 (ED Pa 1986).
——— Citizens Against Pollution v Ohio Power Co 484 F Supp 2d 800 (SD Ohio 2007).
——— Don’t Waste Arizona Inc v McLane Foods Inc 950 F Supp 972 (D Ariz 1997).
——— Environmental Defense Fund Inc v Corps of Engineers 325 F Supp 728 (ED Ark 1971).
——— Florida Medical Association Inc v Department of Health, Education and Welfare 479 F
Supp 1291 (MD Fla 1979).
——— Freeman v Bureau of Land Management 526 F Supp 2d 1178 (D Or 2007).
——— Idaho Sporting Congress v Computrol Inc 952 F Supp 690 (D Idaho 1996).
474 Table of Cases
——— Inner City Press/Community on the Move v Board of Governors of Federal Reserve System(I) 380 F Supp 2d 211 (SDNY 2005).
——— Kaw Valley Inc v EPA 844 F Supp 705 (D Kan 1994).
——— Mobay Chemical Corp v Costle 517 F Supp 252 (WD Pa 1981).
——— Monsanto Co v Acting Administrator, EPA 564 F Supp 552 (ED Mo 1983).
——— Moore v Ford Motor Co (I) 28 F 2d 529 (SDNY 1928).
——— National Broadcasting Co v Sports Broadcasting Act 836 F Supp 121 (SDNY 1993).
——— Natural Resources Defense Council v US Department of Defense (I) 388 F Supp 2d 1086
(CD Cal 2005).
——— Natural Resources Defense Council v US Department of Defense (II) 442 F Supp 2d 857
(CD Cal 2006).
——— New York Public Interest Research Group v EPA 249 F Supp 2d 327 (SDNY 2003).
——— New York v Johnson Complaint No 1:07 CV 10632 (BSJ) (DCF) (SDNY 2007).
——— Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides v Browner 941 F Supp 197 (DDC 1996).
——— Petrolite Corp v EPA 519 F Supp 966 (DDC 1981).
——— Providence Journal Co v FBI 460 F Supp 778 (DRI 1978).
——— Tanner v Armco Steel Corp 340 F Supp 532 (SD Tex 1972).
——— United States v Reaves 923 F Supp 1530 (MD Fla 1996).
——— Winning Ways Inc v Holloway Sportswear Inc 903 F Supp 1457 (D Kan 1995).
Missouri Court of Appeals Reddi-Wip Inc v Lemay Valve Co 354 SW 2d 913 (Mo App 1962).
New York Court of Appeals Wynehamer v People 13 NY 378 (NY 1856).
Supreme Court Allgeyer v Louisiana 165 US 578 (1897).
——— Armstrong v United States 364 US 40 (1960).
——— Board of Regents of State Colleges v Roth 408 US 564 (1972).
——— Board of Trade of City of Chicago v Christie Grain and Stock Co 198 US 236 (1905).
——— Boston Chamber of Commerce v Boston 217 US 189 (1910).
——— Brown v Board of Education 347 US 483 (1954).
——— Buckhannon Board and Care Home Inc v West Virginia Department of Health and HumanResources 532 US 598 (2001).
——— Calder v Bull 3 US 386 (1798).
——— Carpenter v United States 484 US 19 (1987).
——— Chicago, Burlington and Quincy Railroad Co v Chicago 166 US 226 (1897).
——— Christopher v E I Du Pont de Nemours and Co Inc 400 US 1024 (1971).
——— Chrysler Corp v Brown 441 US 281 (1979).
——— Cincinnati v Vester 281 US 439 (1930).
——— Cruzan v Missouri Department of Health 497 US 261 (1990).
——— Day-Brite Lighting Inc v Missouri 342 US 421 (1952).
——— Department of State v Ray 502 US 164 (1991).
——— Department of State v Washington Post 456 US 595 (1982).
——— Department of the Air Force v Rose 425 US 352 (1976).
——— Dolan v City of Tigard 512 US 374 (1994).
——— Dr Miles Medical Co v John D Park and Sons Co 220 US 373 (1911).
——— Dred Scott v Sandford 60 US 393 (1856).
——— E I Du Pont de Nemours Powder Co v Masland 244 US 100 (1917).
——— EPA v Mink 410 US 73 (1973).
——— Federal Election Commission v Akins 524 US 11 (1998).
——— Ferguson v Skrupa 372 US 726 (1963).
——— Friends of the Earth Inc v Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc 528 US 167 (2000).
——— Graham v John Deere Co 383 US 1 (1966).
——— Gwaltney of Smithfield Ltd v Chesapeake Bay Foundation Inc 484 US 49 (1987).
——— Hallstrom v Tillamook County 493 US 20 (1989).
——— Hawaii Housing Authority v Midkiff 467 US 229 (1984).
——— International News Service v Associated Press 248 US 215 (1918).
Table of Cases 475
——— Kewanee Oil Co v Bicron Corp 416 US 470 (1974).
——— Kirby Forest Industries Inc v United States 467 US 1 (1984).
——— Linda R S v Richard D 410 US 614 (1973).
——— Lingle v Chevron USA Inc 544 US 528 (2005).
——— Lochner v New York 198 US 45 (1905).
——— Loretto v Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp 458 US 419 (1982).
——— Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v Radford 295 US 555 (1935).
——— Lucas v South Carolina Coastal Council 505 US 1003 (1992).
——— Lujan v Defenders of Wildlife 504 US 555 (1992).
——— Lynch v United States 292 US 571 (1934).
——— Massachusetts v EPA 549 US 497 (2007).
——— Missouri Pacific Railway Company v Nebraska 164 US 403 (1896).
——— New York v United States 505 US 144 (1992).
——— Nollan v California Coastal Commission 483 US 825 (1987).
——— O’Reilly v Morse 56 US 62 (1853).
——— Penn Central Transportation Co v New York City 438 US 104 (1978).
——— Pennsylvania Coal Co v Mahon 260 US 393 (1922).
——— Phillips v Washington Legal Foundation 524 US 156 (1998).
——— Printz v United States 521 US 898 (1997).
——— Roe v Wade 410 US 113 (1973).
——— Ruckelshaus v Monsanto Co (I) 464 US 890 (1983).
——— Ruckelshaus v Monsanto Co (II) 467 US 986 (1984).
——— Sierra Club v Morton 405 US 727 (1972).
——— Stanley v Georgia 394 US 557 (1969).
——— Steel Co v Citizens for a Better Environment 523 US 83 (1998).
——— Thompson v Consolidated Gas Utilities Corp 300 US 55 (1937).
——— United States v 564.54 Acres of Land 441 US 506 (1979).
——— United States v Central Eureka Mining Co 357 US 155 (1958).
——— United States v Fuller 409 US 488 (1973).
——— United States v General Motors Corp 323 US 373 (1945).
——— United States v Lopez 514 US 549 (1995).
——— Washington v Glucksberg 521 US 702 (1997).
——— Webb’s Fabulous Pharmacies Inc v Beckwith 449 US 155 (1980).
——— Weinberger v Catholic Action of Hawaii 454 US 139 (1981).
Supreme Court of Chile Pedro Flores v Codelco Judgment of 23 June 1988, translated in (1989)
2 Georgetown International Environmental Law Review 251.
Supreme Court of Kansas Koch Engineering Co Inc v Faulconer 227 Kan 813 (1980).
Supreme Court of Massachusetts Peabody v Norfolk 98 Mass 452 (1868).
——— Vickery v Welch 36 Mass 523 (1837).
Supreme Court of Missouri Harrington v National Outdoor Advertising Co 355 Mo 524 (1946).
——— Luckett v Orange Julep Co 271 Mo 289 (1917).
Supreme Court of Ohio Ohio Chamber of Commerce and Others v State Emergency ResponseCommission 597 NE 2d 487 (1992).
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v Edmunds 526 Pa 374 (1991).
——— Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v National Gettysburg Battlefield Tower Inc 454 Pa 193
(1973).
——— Payne v Kassab 468 Pa 226 (1976).
——— United Artists’ Theater Circuit Inc v City of Philadelphia 535 Pa 370 (1993).
Supreme Court of the Philippines Minors Oposa v Secretary of the Department of Environmentand Natural Resources Judgment of 30 July 1993, reprinted in (1994) 33 International Legal
Materials 173.
476 Table of Cases
Legislation & Documents
J Boyd ‘Water Pollution Taxes: A Good Idea Doomed to Failure?’ (May 2003) Resources for the
Future Discussion Paper No 3–20 <http://www.rff.org/rff/documents/RFF-DP-03-20.pdf>accessed 30 June 2010.
Bundestag, Abgabenordnung, 1 October 2002, BGBl I, 3866; last amended 30 July 2009, BGBl I,
2474.
———, Gesetz gegen den unlauteren Wettbewerb, 3 July 2004, BGBl I, 1414; last amended 29
July 2009, BGBl I, 2413.
———, Gesetz zur Ausf€uhrung des Protokolls €uber Schadstofffreisetzungs- und -verbringungs-
register vom 21. Mai 2003 sowie zur Durchf€uhrung der Verordnung (EG) Nr. 166/2006, 6 June2007, BGBl I, 1002.
———, Umweltinformationsgesetz, 22 December 2004, BGBl I, 3704.
Commission, Amended Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on
Public Access to Environmental Information, COM (2001) 303 final, [2001] OJ C 240E/289.
———, Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the
European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Towards a
Shared Environmental Information System (SEIS), COM (2008) 46 final, 1 February 2008.
———, Communication of 26 March 1997 on Environmental Taxes and Charges in the Single
Market, [1997] OJ C 224/6.
———, Communication on the Legal Nature of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the
European Union, COM (2000) 644 final, 11 October 2000.
———, Communication to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and
Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, On the Road to Sustainable Production:
Progress in Implementing Council Directive 96/61/EC Concerning Integrated Pollution Pre-
vention and Control, COM (2003) 354 final, 19 June 2003.
———, Communication to the European Parliament Pursuant to the Second Subparagraph of
Article 251 (2) of the EC Treaty Concerning the Common Position of the Council on the
Adoption of a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Public Access to
Environmental Information, SEC (2002) 103 final, 31 January 2002.
———, Communication to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and
Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions on the Mid-Term Review of the Sixth
Community Environment Action Programme, COM (2007) 225 final, 30 April 2007.
———, Communication Towards a Thematic Strategy on the Prevention and Recycling of Waste,
COM (2003) 301 final, 27 May 2003.
———, Decision 2000/479/EC of 17 July 2000 on the Implementation of a European Pollutant
Emission Register (EPER) According to Article 15 of Council Directive 96/61/EC Concerning
Integrated Pollution Prevention and Control (IPPC), [2000] OJ L 192/36.
D. B€unger, Deficits in EU and US Mandatory Environmental Information Disclosure,DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-22757-8, # Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012
477
———, Decision 80/1332/EEC of 11 December 1980 on Vacuum Interrupters Ltd, [1980] OJ L
383/1.
———, Decision 94/90/EC of 8 February 1994 on Public Access to Commission Documents,
[1994] OJ L 46/58.
———, Draft Interinstitutional Agreement on the Operating Framework for the European Regu-
latory Agencies, COM (2005) 59 final, 25 February 2005.
——— ‘EPER Review Report 2001’ (June 2004).
——— ‘EPER Review Report 2004’ (May 2007) Contract No 70402/2006/440841/MAR/C4.
———, Green Paper on Market-Based Instruments for Environment and Related Policy Purposes,
COM (2007) 140 final, 28 March 2007.
——— Guidance Document for EPER Implementation (Office for Official Publications of the
European Communities, Luxembourg 2000).
——— ‘Guidance Document for the Implementation of the European PRTR’ (31 May 2006)
<http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pollutants/stationary/eper/pdf/en_prtr.pdf> accessed 30
June 2010.
———, Opinion Pursuant to Article 251 (2), Third Subparagraph, Point (c) of the EC Treaty, on
the European Parliament’s Amendments to the Council’s Common Position Regarding the
Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Public Access to
Environmental Information, COM (2002) 498 final, 5 September 2002.
——— ‘Pollution: New European Register Gives Public Access to Information on Emissions from
European Industrial Facilities’ (9 November 2009) Press Release IP/09/1689.
———, Proposal for a Council Decision on the Conclusion, on Behalf of the European Commu-
nity, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers, COM (2004) 635
final, 6 October 2004.
———, Proposal for a Directive Introducing a Tax on Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Energy,
COM (1992) 226 final, 30 June 1992.
———, Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Public Access
to Environmental Information, COM (2000) 402 final, [2000] OJ C 337E/156.
———, Proposal for a Directive on Industrial Emissions, COM (2007) 844 final, 21 December
2007.
———, Proposal for a Directive Restructuring the Community Framework for the Taxation of
Energy Products, COM (1997) 30 final, 12 March 1997.
———, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the
Establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and Amending Council
Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC, COM (2004) 634 final, 7 October 2004.
———, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the
Application of the Provisions of the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public
Participation in Decision-Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to EC
Institutions and Bodies, COM (2003) 622 final, 24 October 2003.
———, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Voluntary
Participation by Organisations in a Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS),
COM (2008) 402 final, 16 June 2008.
———, Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council Regarding
Public Access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents, COM (2008)
229 final, 30 April 2008.
———, Report on the Implementation of the Principles in Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 Regarding
Public Access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents, COM (2004) 45
final, 30 January 2004.
———, Report to the Council and the European Parliament on the Experience Gained in the
Application of Council Directive 90/313/EEC of 7 June 1990, on Freedom of Access to
Information on the Environment, COM (2000) 400 final, 29 June 2000.
———, Report to the Council on the Review of the European Environment Agency (EEA), COM
(2003) 800 final, 22 December 2003.
478 Legislation & Documents
Committee of the Regions, Opinion on the Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and
of the Council on Public Access to Environmental Information, [2001] OJ C 148/9.
Committee on Energy and Commerce ‘The American Clean Energy and Security Act of 2009’ (31
May 2009) Discussion Draft Summary <http://energycommerce.house.gov/Press_111/
20090331/acesa_summary.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
Committee on Environment and Public Works, Print Number 99–169, 99th Congress, 2nd Session
(1986).
Congress, 115 Congressional Record, 91st Congress, 1st Session (1969).
———, 132 Congressional Record, 99th Congress, 2nd Session (1986).
———, Administrative Procedure Act of 1946, Public Law 79–404, 60 Stat 237.
———, An Act to Revise, Codify, and Enact into Positive Law, Title 18 of the United States Code,
Entitled ‘Crimes and Criminal Procedure’, Public Law 80–772, 62 Stat 683, 791; last amended
30 July 2008, Public Law 110–289, 122 Stat 2780.
———, Asset Conservation, Lender Liability, and Deposit Insurance Protection Act of 1996,
Public Law 104–208, 110 Stat 3009.
———, Atomic Energy Act of 1954, Public Law 83–703, 68 Stat 919.
———, Clean Air Act of 1970, Public Law 91–604, 84 Stat 1676.
———, Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980,
Public Law 96–510, 94 Stat 2767.
———, Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2008, Public Law 110–61, 121 Stat 1844.
———, Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act of 1986, Public Law 99–499,
100 Stat 1613, 1728–1758.
———, Endangered Species Act of 1973, Public Law 93–205, 87 Stat 884.
———, Energy Tax Act of 1978, Public Law 95–618, 92 Stat 3174.
———, Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act of 1947, Public Law 80–104, 61 Stat
163; last amended 3 August 1996, Public Law 104–170, 110 Stat 1489.
———, Freedom of Information Act of 1966, Public Law 89–554, 80 Stat 383; last amended 31
December 2007, Public Law 110–175, 121 Stat 2525.
———, National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, Public Law 91–190, 83 Stat 852.
———, Pollution Prevention Act of 1990, Public Law 101–508, 104 Stat 1388.
———, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976, Public Law 94–580, 90 Stat 2795.
———, Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001, Public Law
107–118, 115 Stat 2356.
———, Superfund Recycling Equity Act of 1999, Public Law 106–113, 113 Stat 1536.
———, The Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986, Public Law 99–499, 100
Stat 1613.
———, Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976, Public Law 94–469, 90 Stat 2003.
———, Water Pollution Control Act of 1972, Public Law 92–500, 86 Stat 816.
Congressional Research Service ‘The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act
(EPCRA): A Summary’ (4 March 2009) Report for Congress RL32683.
Council, 2697th Meeting, 15057/05, 2 December 2005.
———, Common Position (EC) 24/2002 Adopted by the Council on 28 January 2002With a View
to Adopting Directive 2002/. . ./EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of . . . onPublic Access to Environmental Information and Repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC,
[2002] OJ C 113 E/1.
———, Decision 1999/468/EC of 28 June 1999 Laying Down the Procedures for the Exercise of
Implementing Powers Conferred on the Commission, [1999] OJ L 184/23.
———, Decision 2000/527/EC of 14 August 2000 Amending Decision 93/731/EC on Public
Access to Council Documents and Council Decision 2000/23/EC on the Improvement of
Information on the Council’s Legislative Activities and the Public Register of Council
Documents, [2000] OJ L 212/9.
———, Decision 2002/358/EC of 25 April 2002 Concerning the Approval, on Behalf of
the European Community, of the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework
Legislation & Documents 479
Convention on Climate Change and the Joint Fulfilment of Commitments Thereunder, [2002]
OJ L 130/1.
———, Decision 2005/370/EC of 17 February 2005 on the Conclusion, on Behalf of the European
Community, of the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-
Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, [2005] OJ L 124/1.
———, Decision 2006/512/EC of 17 July 2006 Amending Decision 1999/468/EC Laying Down
the Procedures for the Exercise of Implementing Powers Conferred on the Commission, [2006]
OJ L 200/11.
———, Decision 2006/61/EC of 2 December 2005 on the Conclusion, on Behalf of the European
Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers, [2006] OJ L
32/54.
———, Decision 93/731/EC of 20 December 1993 on Public Access to Council Documents,
[1993] OJ L 340/43.
———, Directive 2003/96/EC of 27 October 2003 Restructuring the Community Framework for
Taxation of Energy Products and Electricity, [2003] OJ L 283/51.
———, Directive 67/548/EEC of 27 June 1967 on the Approximation of the Laws, Regulations
and Administrative Provisions Relating to the Classification, Packaging and Labelling of
Dangerous Substances, [1967] OJ L 196/1.
———, Directive 75/442/EEC of 15 July 1975 on Waste, [1975] OJ L 194/39.
———, Directive 76/464/EEC of 4 May 1976 on Pollution Caused by Certain Dangerous
Substances Discharged into the Aquatic Environment of the Community, [1976] OJ L 129/23.
———, Directive 84/360/EEC of 28 June 1984 on the Combating of Air Pollution from Industrial
Plants, [1984] OJ L 188/20.
———, Directive 85/337/EEC of 27 June 1985 on the Assessment of the Effects of Certain Public
and Private Projects on the Environment, [1985] OJ L 175/40.
———, Directive 89/369/EEC of 8 June 1989 on the Prevention of Air Pollution from New
Municipal Waste Incineration Plants, [1989] OJ L 163/32.
———, Directive 89/429/EEC of 21 June 1989 on the Reduction of Air Pollution from Existing
Municipal Waste Incineration Plants, [1989] OJ L 203/50.
———, Directive 90/313/EEC of 7 June 1990 on the Freedom of Access to Information on the
Environment, [1990] OJ L 158/56.
———, Directive 91/271/EEC of 21 May 1991 Concerning Urban Waste-Water Treatment,
[1991] OJ L 135/40.
———, Directive 91/689/EEC of 12 December 1991 on Hazardous Waste, [1991] OJ L 377/20.
———, Directive 94/67/EC of 16 December 1994 on the Incineration of Hazardous Waste, [1994]
OJ L 365/34.
———, Directive 96/61/EC of 24 September 1996 Concerning Integrated Pollution Prevention
and Control, [1996] OJ L 257/26.
———, Presidency Conclusions, Bulletin of the European Communities No 4/1990, Dublin, 28
April 1990.
———, Presidency Conclusions, 150/99 REV1, Cologne, 3 and 4 June 1999 <http://www.
consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/kolnen.htm> accessed 30 June
2010.
———, Presidency Conclusions, 200/1/99, Tampere, 15 and 16 October 1999 <http://www.
consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/00200-r1.en9.htm> accessed
30 June 2010.
———, Presidency Conclusions, SN 150/1/98 REV 1, Cardiff, 15 and 16 June 1998<http://www.
consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/54315.pdf> accessed 30 June
2010.
———, Presidency Conclusions, 7652/1/08 REV 1, Brussels, 13 and 14 March 2008 <http://
www.consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/99410.pdf> accessed 30
June 2010.
480 Legislation & Documents
———, Presidency Conclusions, SN 300/96, Florence, 21 and 22 June 1996 <http://www.
consilium.europa.eu/ueDocs/cms_Data/docs/pressData/en/ec/032a0002.htm> accessed 30
June 2010.
———, Regulation (EEC) 1836/93 of 29 June 1993 Allowing Voluntary Participation by
Companies in the Industrial Sector in a Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme,
[1993] OJ L 168/1.
Council and Commission, Code of Conduct 93/730/EC of 6 December 1993 Concerning Public
Access to Council and Commission Documents, [1993] OJ L 340/41.
Council of Europe, Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms
(1998)<http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/005.htm> accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Protocol to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental
Freedoms, 20 March 1952 <http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/009.htm>accessed 30 June 2010.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs ‘Public Access to Environmental Informa-
tion: Experience Gained in the Application of Directive 2003/4/EC’ (London 2009) <http://
www.defra.gov.uk/corporate/policy/opengov/eir/pdf/commission-report-uk.pdf> accessed 30
June 2010.
ECOFYS ‘Initial Assessment of National Allocation Plans for Phase II of the EU Emission
Trading Scheme’ (November 2006) <http://www.ecofys.de/de/veroeffentlichungen/
documents/Ecofys_Summary_InitialNAP2_Assessment.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
Economic and Social Committee, Opinion on the Proposal for a Directive of the European
Parliament and of the Council on Public Access to Environmental Information, [2001] OJ C
116/43.
———, Opinion on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
Concerning the Establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and
Amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC, [2005] OJ C 255/55.
European Chemicals Agency, Decision on the Implementation of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of
the European Parliament and of the Council Regarding Public Access to Documents to
European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents, MB/12/2008 final <http://echa.
europa.eu/doc/about/organisation/mb/mb_12_2008_final_implementing_rules_access_to_-
documents.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
European Environment Agency Air Pollutant Emission Inventory Guidebook 2009 - TechnicalGuidance to Prepare National Emission Inventories: Technical Report No 9 (2009) (Office forOfficial Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg 2009).
——— Application of the Emissions Trading Directive by EU Member States: Technical ReportNo 13 (2008) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg
2008).
——— ‘Budget of the European Environment Agency for the Financial Year 2010’ (19 January
2010) Administrative Document No 1/2010.
——— Eionet Connects (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,
Luxembourg 2004).
——— Europe’s Environment: The Fourth Assessment (Office for Official Publications of the
European Communities, Luxembourg 2007).
———, Implementation Rules for the Application of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001, Adopted by the
Management Board on 22 June 2004 <http://www.eea.europa.eu/about-us/documents/
administrativedocuments/administrativedocuments/implementingrules.html> accessed 30
June 2010.
——— NEC Directive Status Report 2008 - Reporting by the Member States under Directive2001/81/EC on National Emission Ceilings for Certain Atmospheric Pollutants: TechnicalReport No 11 (2009) (Office for Official Publications of the European Communities,
Luxembourg 2009).
European Parliament, Amended Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on
Public Access to Environmental Information (First Reading), [2001] OJ C 343/165.
Legislation & Documents 481
———, Amended Proposal for a European Parliament and Council Directive on Public Access to
Environmental Information (Second Reading), [2003] OJ C 187E/118.
———, Draft Report on the Proposal for a Council Decision on the Conclusion, on Behalf of the
European Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers,
2004/232 (CNS) provisional, 4 April 2005.
———, Legislative Resolution on the Joint Text Approved by the Conciliation Committee for a
European Parliament and Council Directive on Public Access to Environmental Information
and Repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC (Third Reading), P5_TA (2002) 622, [2004] OJ
C 31E/180.
———, Legislative Resolution on the Proposal for a Council Decision on the Conclusion, on
Behalf of the European Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and
Transfer Registers, P6_TA (2005) 285, [2006] OJ C 157 E/382.
———, Legislative Resolution on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of
the Council Concerning the Establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer
Register and Amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (First Reading),
P6_TA (2005) 276, [2006] OJ C 157 E/266.
———, Opinion of the Committee on Fisheries for the Committee on the Environment, Public
Health and Food Safety on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the
Council Concerning the Establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register
and Amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC, 2004/231 (COD), 26 April
2005.
———, Report on the Proposal for a Council Decision on the Conclusion, on Behalf of the
European Community, of the UN-ECE Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers,
A6-170/2005 final, [2006] OJ C 133 E/15.
———, Report on the Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council
Concerning the Establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and
Amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (First Reading), A6-169/2005 final,
[2006] OJ C 133 E/15.
European Parliament and Council, Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 of 18 December
2006 Concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals
(REACH), Establishing a European Chemicals Agency, Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and
Repealing Council Regulation (EEC) 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) 1488/94 as
well as Council Directive 76/769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC,
93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC, [2007] OJ L 136/3.
———, Corrigendum to Regulation (EC) 761/2001 of 19 March 2001 Allowing Voluntary
Participation by Organisation in a Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme
(EMAS), [2002] OJ L 327/10.
———, Decision 1600/2002/EC of 22 July 2002 Laying Down the Sixth Community Environ-
ment Action Programme, [2002] OJ L 242/1.
———, Decision 280/2004/EC of 11 February 2004 Concerning a Mechanism for Monitoring
Community Greenhouse Gas Emissions and for Implementing the Kyoto Protocol, [2004] OJ L
49/1.
———, Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 Establishing a Framework for Community
Action in the Field of Water Policy, [2000] OJ L 327/1.
———, Directive 2000/76/EC of 4 December 2000 on the Incineration of Waste, [2000] OJ L 332/
91.
———, Directive 2001/80/EC of 23 October 2001 on the Limitation of Emissions of Certain
Pollutants into the Air from Large Combustion Plants, [2001] OJ L 309/1.
———, Directive 2001/81/EC of 23 October 2001 on National Emission Ceilings for Certain
Atmospheric Pollutants, [2001] OJ L 309/22.
———, Directive 2003/4/EC of 28 January 2003 on Public Access to Environmental Information
and Repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC, [2003] OJ L 41/26.
482 Legislation & Documents
———, Directive 2003/87/EC of 13 October 2003 Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas
Emission Allowance Trading Within the Community and Amending Council Directive 96/61/
EC, [2003] OJ L 275/32.
———, Directive 2004/101/EC of 27 October 2004 Amending Directive 2003/87/EC
Establishing a Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Within the Commu-
nity, in Respect of the Kyoto Protocol’s Project Mechanisms, [2004] OJ L 338/18.
———, Directive 2004/35/EC of 21 April 2004 on Environmental Liability With Regard to the
Prevention and Remedying of Environmental Damage, [2004] OJ L 143/56.
———, Directive 2004/48/EC of 29 April 2004 on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property
Rights, [2004] OJ L 195/16.
———, Directive 2006/12/EC of 5 April 2006 on Waste, [2006] OJ L 114/9.
———, Directive 2008/1/EC of 15 January 2008 Concerning Integrated Pollution Prevention and
Control, [2008] OJ L 24/8.
———, Directive 2008/101/EC of 19 November 2008 Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to
Include Aviation Activities in the Scheme for Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading
Within the Community, [2009] OJ L 8/3.
———, Directive 2009/29/EC of 23 April 2009 Amending Directive 2003/87/EC so as to Improve
and Extend the Greenhouse Gas Emission Allowance Trading Scheme of the Community,
[2009] OJ L 140/63.
———, Directive 95/46/EC of 24 October 1995 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to
the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of such Data, [1995] OJ L 281/31.
———, Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on Public Access to Environ-
mental Information and Repealing Council Directive 90/313/EEC: Joint Text Approved by the
Conciliation Committee Provided for in Article 251 (4) of the EC Treaty, PE-CONS 3667/02,
8 November 2002.
———, Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 of 30 May 2001 Regarding Public Access to European
Parliament, Council and Commission Documents, [2001] OJ L 145/43.
———, Regulation (EC) 1367/2006 of 6 September 2006 on the Application of the Provisions of
the Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters to Community Institutions and Bodies, [2006] OJ L
264/13.
———, Regulation (EC) 166/2006 of 18 January 2006 Concerning the Establishment of a
European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and Amending Council Directives 91/689/
EEC and 96/61/EC, [2006] OJ L 33/1.
———, Regulation (EC) 1907/2006 of 18 December 2006 Concerning the Registration, Evalua-
tion, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH), Establishing a European
Chemicals Agency, Amending Directive 1999/45/EC and Repealing Council Regulation
(EEC) 793/93 and Commission Regulation (EC) 1488/94 as well as Council Directive 76/
769/EEC and Commission Directives 91/155/EEC, 93/67/EEC, 93/105/EC and 2000/21/EC,
[2006] OJ L 396/1.
———, Regulation (EC) 401/2009 of 23 April 2009 on the European Environment Agency and
the European Environment Information and Observation Network, [2009] OJ L 126/13.
———, Regulation (EC) 443/2009 of 23 April 2009 Setting Emission Performance Standards for
New Passenger Cars as Part of the Community’s Integrated Approach to Reduce CO2
Emissions from Light-Duty Vehicles, [2009] OJ L 140/1.
———, Regulation (EC) 715/2007 of 20 June 2007 on Type Approval of Motor Vehicles with
Respect to Emissions from Light Passenger and Commercial Vehicles (Euro 5 and Euro 6) and
on Access to Vehicle Repair and Maintenance Information, [2007] OJ L 171/1.
———, Regulation (EC) 761/2001 of 19 March 2001 Allowing Voluntary Participation by
Organisations in a Community Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS), [2001] OJ L
114/1.
European Union, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, [2000] OJ C 364/1.
Legislation & Documents 483
———, Consolidated Versions of the Treaty on European Union (TEU) and the Treaty on the
Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), [2008] OJ C 115/1.
———, Treaty of Maastricht, [1992] OJ C 191/1.
———, Treaty of Nice, [2001] OJ C 80/1.
Government Accountability Office ‘Environmental Right-to-Know: EPA’s Recent Rule Could
Reduce Availability of Toxic Chemical Information Used to Assess Environmental Justice’ (4
October 2007) Document No GAO-08-115T <http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d08115t.pdf>accessed 30 June 2010.
——— ‘Toxic Chemical Releases: EPA Actions Could Reduce Environmental Information
Available to Many Communities’ (November 2007) Document No GAO-08-128 <http://
www.gao.gov/new.items/d08128.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
——— ‘Toxic Chemicals: EPA’s Toxic Release Inventory Is Useful but Can Be Improved’ (June
1991) Document No GAO/RCED-91-121 <http://archive.gao.gov/d20t9/144255.pdf>accessed 30 June 2010.
——— ‘Toxic Substances: Status of EPA’s Efforts to Reduce Toxic Releases’ (September 1994)
Document No GAO/RCED-94-207<http://archive.gao.gov/t2pbat2/152791.pdf> accessed 30
June 2010.
Government of the Netherlands ‘Kilometre Charge for Road Users’ (18 November 2009) Press
Release.
House of Representatives, 1105, 111th Congress (2009).
———, 2454, 111th Congress (2009).
———, Conference Report No 1560, 95th Congress, 2nd Session (1978).
———, Document No 364, 91st Congress, 2nd Session (1970).
———, Document No 366, 91st Congress, 2nd Session (1970).
———, Report No 1497, 89th Congress, 2nd Session (1966).
———, Report No 962, 99th Congress, 2nd Session (1986).
National Research Council Tracking Toxic Substances at Industrial Facilities: Engineering MassBalance versus Materials Accounting (National Academy Press, Washington DC 1990).
Office of the Attorney General of the US, Memorandum from Eric Holder to Heads of
Departments and Agencies, 19 March 2009 <http://www.justice.gov/ag/foia-memo-
march2009.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Memorandum from Janet Reno to Heads of Departments and Agencies, 4 October 1993
<http://www.fas.org/sgp/clinton/reno.html> accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Memorandum from John Ashcroft to Heads of Departments and Agencies, 12 October
2001 <http://www.fas.org/sgp/foia/ashcroft.html> accessed 30 June 2010.
OMBWatch ‘Lessons of Bhopal: 25 Years Later, US Chemical Laws Need Strengthening’ (2009)
10 The Watcher 5.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development Economic Instruments for PollutionControl and Natural Resources Management in OECD Countries: A Survey (Organisation for
Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris 1999).
——— Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers (PRTRS): A Tool for Environmental Policy andSustainable Development; Guidance Manual for Governments (Organisation for Economic
Cooperation and Development, Paris 1996).
——— The Polluter Pays Principle: Definition, Analysis, Implementation (Organisation for
Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris 1975).
A S Pfaff and Others ‘Big Field, Small Potatoes: An Empirical Assessment of EPA’s Self-Audit
Policy’ (2002) Working Paper No 02–2<http://ssrn.com/abstract¼307241> accessed 30 June
2010.
T Schomerus ‘Informationsanspr€uche im Atom- und Strahlenschutzrecht: Endbericht’ (7 October
2010) Document No 3608S70001 <http://doris.bfs.de/jspui/bitstream/urn:nbn:de:0221-
201011233819/3/BfS_2010_3608S70001.pdf> accessed 1 February 2011.
Senate, Report No 1219, 88th Congress, 2nd Session (1964).
———, Report No 334, 95th Congress, 1st Session (1977).
484 Legislation & Documents
———, Report No 813, 89th Congress, 1st Session (1965).
R N Stavins ‘Environmental Economics’ (2007) National Bureau of Economic Research Working
Paper No 13574 <http://www.nber.org/papers/w13574.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
The White House, Executive Order 10501 Safeguarding Official Information in the Interests of the
Defense of the United States, 18 Federal Register 7049 (1953).
———, Executive Order 12856 Federal Compliance With Right-To-Know Laws and Pollution
Prevention Requirements, 58 Federal Register 41981 (1993).
———, Executive Order 13148 Greening the Government Through Leadership in Environmental
Management, 65 Federal Register 24595 (2000).
——— ‘Improving Energy Security, American Competitiveness and Job Creation, and Environ-
mental Protection through a Transformation of our Nation’s Fleet of Cars and Trucks’ (21 May
2010) Presidential Memorandum Regarding Fuel Efficiency Standards.
——— ‘President Obama Announces National Fuel Efficiency Policy’ (19 May 2009) Press
Release.
———, Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986: Statement on Signing HR 2005
Into Law (October 17, 1986), 22 Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents 1407 (1986).
United Nations, Agenda 21, 1992<http://www.un.org/esa/dsd/agenda21> accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, 1972 <http://
www.unep.org/Documents.Multilingual/Default.asp?
DocumentID¼97&ArticleID¼1503&l¼en> accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 1998
<http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/kpeng.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Document No A/CONF.151/26 (Vol
I), 1992 <http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm> accessed 30
June 2010.
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe ‘Analysis of the Costs and Benefits of Pollutant
Release and Transfer Registers’ (11 February 2002) Document No CEP/WG.5/AC.2/2002/4
<http://www.unece.org/env/documents/2002/cep/wg.5/ac.2/cep.wg.5.ac.2.2002.4.e.pdf>accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making and
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters, 25 June 1998 <http://www.unece.org/env/pp/
documents/cep43e.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
———Guidance on Implementation of the Protocol on Pollutant Release and Transfer Registers:To the Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making andAccess to Justice in Environmental Matters (United Nations, Geneva 2008).
United Nations Environment Programme, The Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the
Ozone Layer, 2000 <http://www.unep.org/ozone/pdfs/montreal-protocol2000.pdf> accessed
30 June 2010.
US Environmental Protection Agency Acid Rain and Related Programs: 2007 Progress Report(US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC 2009).
———, Addition of Certain Chemicals; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting; Community Right-
to-Know; Final Rule, 59 Federal Register 61432 (1994).
———, Addition of Facilities in Certain Industry Sectors; Revised Interpretation of Otherwise
Use; Toxic Release Inventory Reporting; Community Right-to-Know; Final Rule, 62 Federal
Register 23834 (1997).
———, Addition of Facilities in Certain Industry Sectors; Toxic Chemical Release Reporting;
Community Right-to-Know; Proposed Rule, 61 Federal Register 33588 (1996).
———, Apex Microtechnology Inc, Docket No EPCRA-09-92-00-07 (1993).
——— ‘Audit Policy Update’ (March 1998) Document No 300-N-98-003 <http://www.epa.gov/
oecaerth/resources/newsletters/incentives/auditupdate/spr1998.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation Adjustment Rule; Final Rule; Correction, 74 Federal
Register 626 (2009).
———, Clean-Fuel Vehicles, 40 Code of Federal Regulations } 88 (2009).
Legislation & Documents 485
———, Consolidated Rules of Practice Governing the Administrative Assessment of Civil
Penalties and the Revocation/Termination or Suspension of Permits, 40 Code of Federal
Regulations } 22 (2010).
———, Control of Air Pollution from Aircraft and Aircraft Engines, 40 Code of Federal
Regulations } 87 (2009).
———, Control of Air Pollution from Marine Compression-Ignition Engines, 40 Code of Federal
Regulations } 94 (2009).
———, Control of Air Pollution from Mobile Sources, 40 Code of Federal Regulations } 85
(2009).
———, Control of Emissions from Locomotives and Locomotive Engines, 40 Code of Federal
Regulations } 92 (2009).
———, Control of Emissions from Marine Spark-Ignition Engines, 40 Code of Federal
Regulations } 91 (2009).
———, Control of Emissions from New and In-Use Highway Vehicles and Engines, 40 Code of
Federal Regulations } 86 (2009).
———, Control of Emissions from New and In-Use Nonroad Compression-Ignition Engines, 40
Code of Federal Regulations } 89 (2009).
———, Control of Emissions from Nonroad Spark-Ignition Engines At or Below 19 Kilowatts, 40
Code of Federal Regulations } 90 (2009).
———, Disclosure of Effluent and Emission Data Obtained under Title III of SARA, The
Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act, Class Determination 4–89 (1989)
<http://www.epa.gov/ogc/documents/4-89.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Endangerment and Cause or Contribute Findings for Greenhouse Gases Under Section
202(a) of the Clean Air Act; Final Rule, 74 Federal Register 66496 (2009).
——— ‘Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishment Report FY 1994’ (1995)
<http://cfpub.epa.gov/compliance/resources/reports/accomplishment/details.cfm> accessed
30 June 2010.
——— ‘Enforcement and Compliance Assurance Accomplishment Report FY 1999’ (2000)
<http://cfpub.epa.gov/compliance/resources/reports/accomplishment/details.cfm> accessed
30 June 2010.
——— ‘Enforcement Response Policy for Section 313 of the Emergency Planning Community
Right-to-Know Act (1986) and Section 6607 of the Pollution Prevention Act (1990)’ (1992,
last amended 2001) <http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/policies/civil/epcra/
epcra313erp.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
——— ‘FY 2010 EPA Budget in Brief’ (May 2009) Administrative Document No EPA-205-S-09-
001.
———, In Re Pease and Curren Inc, Docket No EPCRA-I-90-1008 (1991).
———, Incentives for Self-Policing: Discovery, Disclosure, Correction and Prevention of
Violations, 65 Federal Register 19618 (2000).
———, Mandatory Reporting of Greenhouse Gases; Final Rule, 74 Federal Register 56260
(2009).
———, National Emission Standards For Hazardous Air Pollutants, 40 Code of Federal
Regulations } 61 (2009).
——— ‘Penalty Policy Supplements Pursuant to the 2004 Civil Monetary Penalty Inflation
Adjustment Rule’ (2006) Memorandum <http://www.epa.gov/compliance/resources/
policies/civil/penalty/tscafifraepcra-penaltyadjustmemo060506.pdf> accessed 30 June 2010.
———, Persistent Bioaccumulative Toxic (PBT) Chemicals; Lowering of Reporting Thresholds
for Certain PBT Chemicals; Addition of Certain PBT Chemicals; Community Right-to-Know
Toxic Chemical Reporting; Final Rule, 64 Federal Register 58666 (1999).
———, Position Statement on Environmental Management Systems and ISO 14001 and a
Request for Comments on the Nature of the Data To Be Collected From Environmental
Management System/ISO 14001 Pilots, 63 Federal Register 12094 (1998).
486 Legislation & Documents
———, Proposed Rulemaking To Establish Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission
Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Economy Standards, 74 Federal Register 49454 (2009).
———, Public Information, 40 Code of Federal Regulations } 2 (2009).
———, Riverside Furniture Corp, Docket No EPCRA-88-H-VI-406S (1989).
———, Superfund Programs; Regulations Governing Citizen Suits; Proposed Rules, 54 Federal
Register 3918 (1989).
———, Toxic Chemical Release Reporting: Community Right-to-Know, 40 Code of Federal
Regulations } 372 (2009).
———, Toxic Pollutant Effluent Standards, 40 Code of Federal Regulations } 129 (2009).
———, Toxics Release Inventory Burden Reduction; Final Rule, 71 Federal Register 76932
(2006).
———, Trade Secrecy Claims for Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Informa-
tion: and Trade Secret Disclosures to Health Professionals, 40 Code of Federal Regulations }350 (2009).
———, Trade Secrecy Claims for Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Informa-
tion; and Trade Secret Disclosures to Health Professionals; Final Rule, 53 Federal Register
28772 (1988).
US Environmental Protection Agency and US Department of Transportation, National Highway
Traffic Safety Administration; 40 CFR Parts 85, 86, and 600; 49 CFR Parts 531, 533, 536, et al;
Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Emission Standards and Corporate Average Fuel Econ-
omy Standards; Final Rule, 75 Federal Register 25323 (2010).
Legislation & Documents 487
![Index [assets.cambridge.org]assets.cambridge.org/97811070/16569/index/9781107016569_index.pdfIndex Abell 41, planetary nebula, 17 Abell 63, planetary nebula, 17 Abdurashitov, J. N.,](https://img.pdfslide.us/doc/110x75/5e084650b47fcb33e20e9921/index-abell-41-planetary-nebula-17-abell-63-planetary-nebula-17-abdurashitov.jpg)
