Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Best Practices for In-Building & Spot Coverage Solutions
Kenneth Monro
Dekolink Americas, Inc.
936-582-7000
June 13, 2006
NPSTC Meeting
Ontario, CA
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Objective of presentation
1. To share information about market activity relative to in-building wireless solutions
2. To review best practices employed when considering in-building systems
3. To understand hardware options in the process of selecting the right tool for the right job
4. To review technology which enables quality deployments
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
“Coverage Solutions”
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Trends in In-building
• In-building deployments have dramatically grown in number and continue to do so
• Some governmental agencies are mandating coverage in certain public buildings
• “Rogue” (un-coordinated/un-approved) deployments are cause for great concern to all mobile network operators
• Public safety officials are feeling the need to address carrier network coverage from public safety perspective
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
In-Building Best Practices
• Site Survey/Audit• Spectrum analysis
and coordination• System Design and
Engineering• Installation and
Implementation• Record and
Catalogue site specifics
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Site Survey/Audit
• In-building DAS– Number of users in building– Number of users of foreign networks– Density of walls, ceilings– Proximity of windows relative to BTS– Existing signal strength in building– Building Size– Complexity of in building environment
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Examples of in-building systems
Small Buildings
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Examples of in-building systems
Large Buildings
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Examples of in-building systems
Simple Solutions
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Examples of in-building systems
Complex Solutions
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Spectrum Analysis and Coordination
• Whose signals are in spectrum of proposed amplifier system
• How will it effect their system• RFC coordinators provide list of LMR operators• FCC can provide list of licensees of other
spectrum• Prior notice of proposed system is the right thing
to do!• Today’s public safety systems with carriers
spectrum under consideration as well as LMR!
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Donor Link-- No Interference
Public Safety RadioDonor Base Station
Repeater
Repeater Donor AntennaBeamwidth
Repeater CoverageArea
Nextel
PrivateSMR NetworkBase Station
If other SMR BTS’ are outside donor antenna beam, use band selectiveClass B OK as long as coverage provided is non-interfering
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
806 809 816 821 824
851 854 861 866 869
900NON-NEXTEL
NEXTEL
SOME NEXTEL
B / ILT VOLUNTEERS
PHASE 1
NEXTEL
806 809 816 821 824
851 854 861 866 869
900
PHASE 3 NEXTELPUBLICSAFETY
NEXTEL806 809 816 821 824
851 854 861 866 869
900
PHASE 2
PUBLIC SAFETY
Band selective solutions
• Systems should be field re-bandable• Systems should have oscillation prevention technology
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Small Site Coverage
To/From
Cell SiteYagi Antenna
Mini-Repeater
Indoor Coverage
Antenna
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Larger Buildings
Floor 2
Floor 1
Floor 3
Floor 4
Floor 5
Floor 6
5/8" or 7/8" coax
RF Tap + 2 Way Splitter
Antenna
To/FromCell Site
Off AirDirectional Antenna(Yagi)
RepeaterRepeater drives distributed antenna system (DAS) in larger areas
DAS distributes even coverage
Quality systems can self optimize gain and level
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Public Safety RadioDonor Base Station
Repeater
Repeater Donor AntennaBeamwidth
Repeater CoverageArea
Nextel
PrivateSMR NetworkBase Station
If the BTS for other SMR services are within the donor antenna beam width, the uplink may cause interferenceChannel Selective Repeaters eliminate interference problems
Donor Link-- Interference
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
824806 809 816 821
NOISE AND INTERFERENCE
FILTER FILTER FILTER FILTER FILTER FILTER
ISOLATED SIGNAL • INTERFERENCE MITIGATED
DSP (Digital Signal Processing)
Filter Bank
BEFORE
AFTER
Channel Selective Solutions
Channel Selective technology can be used in spectrum challenged environments
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
FCC – High Power Outdoor Coverage Repeaters Must be Class A Should be able to be RE-BANDEDShould have Oscillation prevention technologyHigh Power (50W) is desirable to meet most coverage requirementsMust select only those channels that are licensed to you!Should be capable of remote configuration/re-configuration and alarming as a network elementShould use digital filter technology
Channel Selective Devices
Digital Channel Selective Repeater
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Advantages of Digital Signal Processing
• Filter Sharpness – Extremely tight “skirts” for out of band rejection
• Flexibility and Programmability– No of channels
– Channel locations
– Channel width
– Delay and moderation of delay
– Interference rejection
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
> 50 dB
@50 kHz
Filter Sharpness
10 dB / Div
> 40 dB
@600 kHz
Digital technology creates significantly sharper filters compared to advanced SAW IF filtering
Digital Filter SAW Filter
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Yellow Springs, OH
• Political Rally held in remote area
• Poor coverage due to ravine and surrounding hills
• Temporary coverage requirement
• Solved with Channel Selective repeater
• Additional users included State, County and FBI officials for mission critical communications
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
• Should be treated as outdoor solution
• Very “do-able” with Channel Selectivity
• Leaky coax or DAS
Tunnel Coverage
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Installation and Implementation
•• Antenna SpacingAntenna Spacing•• Proper IsolationProper Isolation•• Proper gain/levelProper gain/level•• Ingress/EgressIngress/Egress•• Cable typesCable types•• Power systemsPower systems•• Lightening ProtectionLightening Protection•• Coax/FiberCoax/Fiber
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
System Design and Engineering
Hardware Selection Process– Repeaters/BDAs
• Inherent Characteristics: – Power– Gain– Noise levels
• Important Features: – High Q filters and Frequency Selectivity– Level/Gain control– Oscillation monitoring/elimination– Software controlled Tuning, Alarming, management
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
System Design and Engineering
Hardware Selection-- Ancillaries
– Donor antennas with high directionality– Cable and Connectors with low loss/Noise– Lightening arrestors at ingress/egress
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
System Design and Engineering
Donor site path– What is signal crossing on it’s way to BTS– What is signal reaching past BTS– Is the signal too strong for application?– Do I need channel selectivity?– How is the network effected by
deployment?
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Installation and Implementation
Case Study: Tier 1 PCS operator, NYC
• Carrier’s customer improperly self installed system• Donor antenna and coverage antenna too close
resulting in not enough isolation• System Oscillated causing spurious emissions• One single RF carrier affected• 200 base stations interrupted• 250,000 calls dropped• Subset of calls were 911
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Impacted Cell Sites
Blue dots = Existing Cell Sites Green Stars = Cells with CRSSIRCTI > 5000
NPTSC Meetings – June 2006Ontario, CA
Record and Catalog site specifics
• Tracking of assets– Product type, power, gain, noise level
• Sharing of data possible– Dekolink is assembling a Process for
spectrum owners and users of equipment to identify locations even when not licensed!
• Reduces possibility of interference and reduces time to mitigate interference